Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
* Under section 236(2) for determining the value of shares held by minority
shareholders;
* Under section 260(2)(c) for preparing a valuation report in respect of the
shares and assets in order to arrive at the reserve price for the sale of any
industrial undertaking of the company or for the fixation of the lease rent
or share exchange ratio;
* Section 281(1)(a) provides for valuing assets for submission of report by
Company Liquidator;
* Section 305(2)(d) provides for report on the assets of the company for
declaration of solvency in case of voluntary winding up;
* Section 319(3)(b) for valuing the interest of any dissenting member of the
transferor company who did not vote in favour of the special resolution,
as may be required by the Company Liquidator;
* Section 325(1)(b) states that in winding up of insolvent company for
valuation of annuities and future and contingent liabilities.
Reason for the introduction of the concept
There are international bodies regulating the area of valuation such as
International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC), Valuation Standards of
American Institute of CPAsAmerican Society of Appraisers (ASA), National
Association of Certified Valuation Analysts (NACVA), Institute of Business
Appraisers (IBA) and The Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuers
(CICBV). The need of standardization and regulation in valuation industry is due
to large-scale international and foreign investments made in the industry. Once it
is done asset analysis will be done on common scale and it will simplify
investment process.
For a long time, valuation has been a subject matter of debate and chaos in
India. Substantial number of litigation in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and
buy-backs are about valuation, It became difficult to determine that it is an art or
science due to the element of subjectivity in valuation. There are no specific
standards for valuation of business in India. Because of no specific standards and
professionals appointed for valuation there have always been interference and
interpretation by judiciary.8
There is consensus to some extent among professional valuers with respect to
generally accepted approaches, methods, and procedures when it comes to
valuation of assets of corporations but there are numerous controversies as well
that remain even among the best practitioners. A need was, therefore, felt for
education, training, regulation and standardization of the current practices. The
introduction of the concept of registered valuer in the Companies Act, 2013, will
definitely lead to establishment of Indian Valuation Standards that will enhance
8 Supra Note 5
(JOURNAL) REGISTERED VALUERS UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 59
9 Government of India, Report on Company Law, Ministry of Corporate Affairs: (2006) 1 Comp LJ 26
(Journal).
10 http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-corporate/india-needs-a-council-of-
corporate-valuation-professionals/article1668177.ece
60 COMPANY LAW JOURNAL (2017) 3 Comp LJ
Valuation methods typically fall under one of three basic appraisal approaches: the
asset approach, the market approach, or the income approach.
The asset approach uses appraisal methods that consist of a review of the
individual assets of the company. The most commonly used asset approach method is
called the adjusted book value method. In this method, assets and liabilities are
adjusted to the standard of value, for example fair market value. The major weakness of
this method is that the intangible asset value of a going-concern business is not
measurable. Occasionally, an appraiser may use an asset approach method in
combination with a hybrid-method, the excess earnings method, used to value the
intangible assets of a company.
The market approach uses businesses in the same or similar industry to develop
valuation multiples that can be used to determine a value for the business in question.
Several methods may be usedsome use information from the sale of private
companies, others use the sale of public companies or the price of stock as of the date of
valuation for comparable public companies in the same or similar industry.
The income approach consists of two primary methods: the capitalization of cash
flow method and the discounted cash flow method. These two methods are mutually
exclusive. The basic difference between the two is based on the stability or lack thereof
of expected future income. The most difficult part of the income approach is the
determination of the appropriate discount or capitalization rate to be used. A discount
or capitalization rate measures the risk associated with achieving the projected income
or cash flow.11