Sie sind auf Seite 1von 17

Out-of-Plane Shear Strength of

Reinforced Concrete Walls and Slabs

Greg Mertz
Carl J Costantino and Associates

October 18, 2016 1


Shear Capacity of Walls and Slabs
Focus on One Way Shear
ACI Beam Equation, Vn= 2 f ' c bd
ACI 318-14 R7.6.3.1
Solid slabs and footings have less stringent minimum shear reinforcement
requirements than beams because there is a possibility of load sharing
between weak and strong areas.
ACI 426
Slab research focuses on punching shear
However, research (Angelakos et al. 2001; Lubell et al. 2004; Brown et al.
2006) has shown that deep, lightly reinforced one-way slabs, particularly if
constructed with high-strength concrete or concrete having a small coarse
aggregate size, may fail at shears less than Vc calculated from Eq.
(22.5.5.1). One-way slabs subjected to concentrated loads are more likely
to exhibit this vulnerability.
Beam tests are used to obtain one-way shear capacity
October 18, 2016 2
DOE-STD-1020 and ASCE 43
Probabilistic Basis
Median Strength Conservatism Ratio
Presumed code ultimate strength
98% Exceedance probability
Additional 1.33 factor of conservatism for low ductility failure modes
2.054 S
Rs=e for Ductile Failure
2.054
Rs=1.33 e for Low Ductility Failure
S

RC Walls and Slabs Out of plane shear


Low ductility failure mode
Code Capacity Vn= 2 f ' c bd , =0.75
Test Capacity V Test 2.054 V Test 2.054
=1.33 e S
=e S

VTest/Vn < 2% Pf Vn Vn

October 18, 2016 3


Concrete Beam Shear Database
without stirrups

Reineck, K.H., Kuchma, D.A., Kim, K.S. and Marx, S., Shear Database for
Reinforced Concrete Members Without Shear Reinforcement, ACI Structural
Journal, V. 100, March-April 2003.
439 Test specimen
Noted Equation 11-3 (2f'c bd) of ACI 318-99 is clearly unsafe
318-08 included modifications to limit beams without shear reinforcement.

Reineck, K.H., Bentz, E.C., Fitik, B., Kuchma, D.A. and Bayrak, O., ACI-
DAFStb Database of Shear Tests on Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams
Without Stirrups, ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, September-October 2013.
784 Test specimen
Noted Equation 11-3 (2f'c bd) of ACI 318-11
when used by itself, is unconservative.
Equation 11-3 becomes increasingly unsafe as members become larger and more lightly
reinforced

October 18, 2016 4


2013 Shear Database
ACI Structural Journal, 110-S72 Data extracted from shear database
September-October 2013

Note:
Extracted data matches ACI Journal

Strength is a function of depth

Members with light longitudinal reinforcing have lower shear strength

October 18, 2016 5


Effect of Reinforcing
on Shear Capacity b
4 foot thick wall c
#11 @ 12, d=44.4, =0.3%, c=2.7 N.A.
2#11 @ 6, d=43, =1.2%, c=10.8 d
Increase reinforcing ratio
Increases depth of compression
zone, c
Reduces tensile strain
Reduce tensile crack width
Increased aggregate interlock
Increases dowel action

October 18, 2016 6


Simple Statistics
Vn=2 f ' c bd

d<12 Inches d<24 Inches


566 Specimen 706 Specimen
29 Failures 53 Failures
Pf=29/566= 5.1% Pf=53/706= 7.5%

October 18, 2016 7


Simple Statistics
Vn=2 f ' c bd

ACI Vn has 98% EP for d<24 inches


ACI Vn does not meet ASCE 43
performance goal for d>10 inches
Can this problem be solved by
additional testing?
115
0.02=
N 784
N =4966 Additional Test w/ o Failure

October 18, 2016 8


Simple Statistics, 1%
Vn=2 f ' c bd

d<12 Inches d<24 Inches


93 Specimen 124 Specimen
22 Failures 36 Failures
Pf=22/93= 24% Pf=36/124= 29%
All Depths, 1%, Pf=69/157= 44%
October 18, 2016 9
2013 Shear Data, Log-Log
Vn=2 f ' c bd

Median = 1.405
= 0.39

Curve fit:
4.39
4.39 e.475 ln (d )
d

October 18, 2016 10


2013 Shear Data with Effective
Depth Transformation
2.8
Vn Mod =( )2 f ' c bd
d

Median = 1.67
= 0.272

Note reduction in

October 18, 2016 11


2013 Shear Data with Effective
Depth Transformation
2.8
Vn Mod =( )2 f ' c bd
d
Shear strength is
proportional to
4
100

October 18, 2016 12


2013 Shear Data with both
d and Transformations
4
2.8 100
Vn Mod =( )2 f ' c bd
d
Simple Statistics:
32/784 samples with
Vtest/VnMod<1,
Pf=4.1%
Was Pf=14.7%
<1%, 6/157
samples with
Vtest/VnMod<1,
Pf=3.8%
Was Pf=44%

October 18, 2016 13


Modified Shear Strength
Vn Mod =2 f ' c bd

4
2.8 100
= , d5 inches
d

October 18, 2016 14


2013 Shear Database
vs Modified Capacity
ACI Shear Capacity Modified Shear Capacity

Data from Modified vs ACI capacity


ACI Structural Journal, 110-S72 Small change in median strength

September-October 2013 Significant reduction in variability

Removes bias with large d and low

October 18, 2016 15


Probability of Failure in Buildings

In-situ concrete strength


In-situ concrete is typically at least 1.2 times the minimum design strength.
Median VTest/VnMod = 1.61 Pf=2.3%

In-situ concrete strength + aging


Aging typically increases concrete strength by a factor of at least 1.2.
Median VTest/VnMod = 1.76 Pf=1%

The modified shear capacity is consistent with DOE-STD-1020 and


ASCE 43
98% Exceedance probability
VnMod includes 1.33 factor of conservatism for low ductility failure modes

October 18, 2016 16


Summary
Out-of-plane shear capacity for slabs and walls
Current ACI capacity does not support DOE-STD-1020
or ASCE 43 performance goals.
Modified capacity supporting performance goals is
proposed.
Path Forward
Owners and owners representative
Regulators and peer reviewers
Engineers

October 18, 2016 17

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen