Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Training of neural network for various simulated fault analyzed the impedance of line for different power system
condition using neural network toolbox. frequency and career frequency shown in figure 3.
2.1. Main power system model Table -1: MATLAB Simulink parameter specification of
power system
Figure 1 shows the complete MATLAB simulation model S.N. MATLAB simulation block Parameter specification of MATLAB block
of 25 KV, 60 Hz transmission line having three zone
separated by bus bar. 1 Three-phase source 1,2,3,4 Phase to phase RMS voltage= 25 KV;
Frequency = 50 Hz;
X/R ratio = 2.
transmission line provided with three phase RLC load. Zero sequence resistance per unit length = 0.284
Ohms/km;
4 Three phase fault Fault types = LG, LL, LLG, LLL (AG, BG, CG, ABG,
BCG, ACG, AB, BC, AC, ABC);
\
Fault resistance = 0.001 Ohm;
Fig -2: MATLAB simulation model of zone 2 of main power
Transition time: Fault start time 0.4 sec and fault
system. end time 0.6 sec;
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3016
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3017
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3018
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
4. CONCLUSION
The protection of double circuit line difficult due to self
mutual inductance and mutual inductance effect of
Fig-13: Confusion matrix after successful training of ANN1 transmission line conductor during loading condition. This
for transmission line fault classification mutual inductance affects the protection of transmission line
using distance relay approach due to the over reach and
Figure 13 shows that 93% data are perfectly classify under reach operation of line. For eliminating this difficulty
the fault and remaining fault case data not classify using ANN approach for classification of line and line zone
neural network 1. It means that for remaining 7% data set classification utilized. The proposed approach using ANN
neural network was in confusion state for classify the fault. classify the transmission line fault upto 93% while fault zone
identification done upto 75% only. Also line trap installed at
main protection zone of double circuit line for providing the
protection from high transient surge.
REFERENCES
[1] Aggarwal, R. K., Xuan, Q. Y., Johns, A. T., Li, F., & Bennett,
A. (1999). A novel approach to fault diagnosis in multicircuit
transmission lines using fuzzy ARTmap neural
networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 10(5),
1214-1221.
[2] Dash, P. K., Pradhan, A. K., Panda, G., & Liew, A. C. (2000,
January). Digital protection of power transmission lines in
the presence of series connected FACTS devices. In Power
Fig-14: ROC after successful training of ANN2 for Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000. IEEE(Vol. 3, pp.
transmission line fault zone identification 1967-1972). IEEE.
[3] Eissa, M. M., & Masoud, M. (2001). A novel digital distance
Figure 15 shows that 61.5 % data are perfectly relaying technique for transmission line protection. IEEE
classify the fault zone and remaining fault case data not Transactions on Power Delivery, 16(3), 380-384.
classify using neural network 2. It means that for remaining [4] Gracia, J., Mazon, A. J., & Zamora, I. (2005). Best ANN
48.5 % data set neural network was in confusion state for structures for fault location in single-and double-circuit
classify the fault zone. transmission lines. IEEE transactions on power
delivery, 20(4), 2389-2395.
[5] Jain, A., Thoke, A. S., & Patel, R. N. (2008). Fault
classification of double circuit transmission line using
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3019
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3020