Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Theatre Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
Stacy Wolf
In act 1, scene 1 of Rodgers and Hammer stein's Oklahoma! (1943), Curly, the cowboy,
and Laurey the farm girl?the musical's principals?sing to each other in alternating
verses, "Don't throw bouquets at me / Don't please my folks too much," and "Don't
praise my charm too much / Don't look so vain with me." To the characters, the duet
Sixty years later, in act 1, scene 1 of Stephen Schwartz and Winnie Holzman's Wicked
(2003), Elphaba, the smart, green-skinned outcast, and Glinda, the popular blond, sing
to each other in alternating lines, "What is this feeling so sudden and new?" / "I felt
the moment I laid eyes on you" / "My pulse is rushing" / "My head is reeling" / "My
face is flushing"; and then in unison, "What is this feeling?" The audience might think
the pair is singing a queer love song until they get to the punch line, and it turns out
that "this feeling" is "loathing!" (146). Schwartz plays with the audience's expectations
in the musical's first duet and renders the song doubly queer: first, the song seems to
defy conventions of genre because it sounds like an actual love song, and second, to
defy conventions of gender because it seems to be a love song between two women in
the resolutely heterosexual form of the musical. When the number turns into a "hate
song" like those early "hypothetical" love duets in musicals such as Carousel (1945;
"If I Loved You") and Guys and Dolls (1950; "I'll Know"), Wicked signals that it will
follow the conventions of mid-twentieth-century musical theatre, but queerly, with
two women as the musical's couple.
Based on Gregory Maguire's 1995 novel, Wicked is both a prequel and sequel to The
Wizard of Oz that recounts how a precocious, green-skinned girl became the Wicked
Witch of the West.4 The musical, whose marketing blurb says, "So much happened
before Dorothy dropped in," follows the unlikely friendship between Elphaba (her name
is based on The Wizard ofOz's author, L. Frank Baum), the smart, political outcast, and
Galinda, the vapid, popular girl who becomes Glinda the Good Witch. Wicked follows
Elphaba from birth to boarding school, where she is sent to care for her disabled sister
Nessarose (who will become the Wicked Witch of the East). There, Elphaba is treated
cruelly because she is outspoken and green until Galinda, her unwilling, accidental
roommate, befriends her and soon drops the "a" from her name (changing Galinda
to Glinda) to show Elphaba how much she has been changed by her new friend. El
3
RichardRodgers and Oscar Hammerstein II, Oklahoma! in Six Plays by Rodgers and Hammerstein
Many fans of the novel find the musical vapid and apolitical. Certainly, the musical downplays the
novel's and reframes the narrative to focus on the women's which
sharp critique of power relationship,
a small part of the original. The changes wrought to the novel call attention to the musical
occupies
version's reliance on formal conventions of musical theatre: that of a developing love story.
5Elysa Gardner, "Something 'Wicked7 Comes to Broadway/7 USA Today (31 October 2003): 9E.
6
Frederick M. Winship, "Broadway's 'Wicked' is an Odd Oz Offshoot," United Press International,
17 November 2003; Charles Isherwood, "More Bothered Than Bewitched by 'Wicked,'" Variety (3 No
vember 2003): 30. Isherwood goes on to say: "Wicked is stridently earnest one minute,
self-mocking
the next, a fantastical allegory about the perils of fascism in one scene, a Nickelodeon about
special
the importance of inner beauty in another."
7Ben Brantley, "There's Trouble in Emerald City," New York Times (31 October 2003): El; http:/ /pro
quest.umi.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/pqdweb?index=0&did=866216942&SrchMode=l&sid=l&Fmt=
10&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=HNP&TS=1188838327&clientId=48776 (accessed
3 September 2007).
8http://www.broadwayworld.com/grossesshow.cfm?show=Wicked (accessed 28 June 2007).
9 a
In addition, its cast album won Grammy and hit Platinum by selling
over a million
copies, and
bootlegged video clips on YouTube get thousands of hits daily. The musical's audience now extends
well those who have seen it in the theatre.
beyond
Wicked's familiar source material also accounts for some of its popularity, as it imagines
the back-story of one of America's most well-known and beloved tales, most familiar in
the now classic film version with Judy Garland. Wicked self-consciously poaches lines
from the movie: for instance, when Nessa asks, "What's in the answers,
punch?" Boq
"Lemons and melons and and Nessa "Oh my!" For her entrance, Glinda,
pears," replies,
who up to look like Billie Burke (the actor who played Glinda in the movie),
ismade
floats down in a steel orb that refers to the bubble inwhich Glinda enters in the movie.
She greets the gathered crowd of the citizens of Oz (and the audience in the theatre)
with cleverness, out-front, "It's to see me, isn't
tongue-in-cheek winking straight good
it?" Set details, such as the iconic yellow-brick road and the fallen Kansas house with
the Wicked Witch of the East's striped stockings and ruby-slippered feet poking out,
nod to the movie as well. By the end of Wicked, we learn how Dorothy's companions
became brainless, heartless, and cowardly, and why the ruby slippers matter to the
Wicked Witch of the West.
10
Jessica Sternfeld, The Megamusical (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006), 348-50. Sternfeld's
is the first full-length, musicologically oriented study of the megamusical. Other musical theatre
scholars consider Wicked as a but critically, with international markets,
megamusical, ever-expanding
a
endlessly replaceable actors, and message.
superficial See, for example, Barry Singer, Ever After: The
Last Years ofMusical Theatre and Beyond (New York: Applause, 2004). He completed his book before
Wicked but it fits into his categorization of megamusicals. Raymond Knapp, in The American
opened,
Musical and the Performance of Personal Identity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006), pri
faults "the way the show compromises its starkly original source material" (351), which is an
marily
accurate assessment.
more see Steven On on the
On the megamusical generally, also Adler, Broadway: Art and Commerce
Great White Way (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2004); Mark Steyn, Broadway Babies
Say Goodnight: Musicals Then and Now (New York: Routledge, 1999); David Walsh and Len Platt,
Globalization, and the Megamusical," inMusical Theater and American Culture (Westport,
"Modernity,
CT: Praeger, 2003), 157-71. Steyn, like most critics, rejects this subgenre entirely. Walsh and Platfs
account is more measured, and they defend Webber's Evita as an of theatrical spectacle put
example
to sophisticated use.
ideological
11 see Knapp,
On the persistent themes of "idealism and inspiration," The American Musical and the
But Wicked does more than portray women as powerful and as friends; it presents
the story of a queer romance between Elphaba and Glinda. In this way, Wicked makes
a contribution to the archive.
fascinating, perhaps surprising, queer performance
Scholars of musical theatre and film and also gay/lesbian/queer studies?including
John Clum, Alexander Doty, Bruce Kirie, D. A. Miller, David Rom?n, Michael Schiavi,
and myself?have addressed the multiple ways in which musicals signify queerly.14
From feminized men to flamboyant women, from doubly entendred lyrics to Utopian
expressions of emotion, musicals offer interpretive entries for spectators (queer self
and not) who are willing to see and hear resistantly. What sets Wicked apart
identifying
is that it aligns with the musical's "preferred" reading in accordance with musical
theatre's conventions and In this case, one would need to read Wicked
expectations.
the to enunciate a Even the show's con
"against grain" straight interpretation. logo
sists of a drawing of the two witches: Glinda, in profile, white-skinned and wearing a
white dress and hat, whispers conspiratorially, in a stereotypical pose for girlfriends, in
Elphaba's ear. The latter is dressed in black, her skin bright green. Only Glinda's eyes
are visible; she covers her nose and mouth with her hands, while Elphaba's mouth
and nose are visible but the hat hides her eyes?as if both women are necessary to
make a whole face.15
Inwhat follows, Iwant to demonstrate how Elphaba and Glinda are constructed as
a queer couple inWicked's theatrical, musical world. Schwartz and Holzman's deploy
ment of well-hewn and well-known conventions of musical theatre guarantees that the
12 as the
a young woman Wicked also to the many musicals from
By featuring protagonist, responds
the 1940s to the mid-1960s in which the protagonist was a woman. hearkens back to the inde
Elphaba
pendent, smart, strong-willed belting women of earlier musical also sing from a softer side:
theatre who
Ruth in Wonderful Town, Anita in West Side Story, Fanny Brice in Funny Girl, Sally Bowles in Cabaret,
the title divas in Hello, Dolly! and Mame, and Momma Rose in Gypsy. She also resonates with some
of the feisty, forthright women in the musicals of Rodgers and Hammerstein: Nellie in South Pacific,
Anna in The King and I, Carrie in Carousel, and Maria in The Sound ofMusic.
13
Salman Rushdie, The Wizard ofOz (London: British Film Institute, 1992), 42. Another essay (or two)
might trace out the connections and contradictions among Baum's novels, which presented unusually
progressive gender politics and could easily be read as queer, and the various stage versions of the Oz
stories, the film, and Wicked. See Mark Evan Swartz, Oz Before the Rainbow: L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful
Wizard of Oz on Stage and Screen to 1939 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), 2000.
14
See, for example, John M. Clum, Something for the Boys: Musical Theater and Gay Culture (New York:
St. Martin's Press, 1999); Alexander Doty, Making Things Perfectly Queer: Interpreting Mass Culture (Min
neapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993); Bruce Kirie, Unfinished Show Business: Broadway Musicals
as Works-in-Progress (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2006); D. A. Miller, Place for Us:
on the Broadway Musical] MA: Harvard Press, 1998); David Rom?n,
[Essay (Cambridge, University
Performance in America: Contemporary U.S. Culture and the Performing Arts (Durham, NC: Duke Univer
sity Press, 2005); Michael R. Schiavi, "Opening Ancestral Windows: Post-Stonewall Men and Musical
Theatre/' New England Theatre Journal 13 (2002): 77-98; and Stacy Wolf, A Problem Like Maria: Gender
and Sexuality in the American Musical (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002).
15 are
Importantly, I am not arguing that Elphaba and Glinda lesbians, but rather that the musical
tion, was the importance of a serious story to drive the show. Scott McMillin, in The
Musical as Drama, credits them for creating what he calls "the better book," which gave
coherence to the form of the musical.17 This practice marked the subgenre of musical
theatre called the "book musical" (or now, the musical," "classic musi
"golden-age
cal," or "integrated musical"). By the 1950s, audiences and critics of a book musical
would expect that the story would propel the show and the musical numbers grow
out of the situation, that songs would reflect a character, both in the music
naturally
and the lyrics, and that the production's musical numbers and design would convey
an identifiable time and place.
The importance of the story placed the spoken text in an increasingly valued posi
tion in relation to the musical numbers. Thus the relationship between the script (the
libretto, the spoken play text, the book) and the musical numbers preoccupies histo
rians, critics, and artists of musical theatre. When the script and the music became
is, when musicals came to demonstrate a seamless of
"integrated"?that integration
parts, with speech moving imperceptibly into music, drama moving invisibly into a
musical number, everyday (stage) movement moving naturally into dance?theatre
history tells us that the form found its highest achievement. The moment of integration
tends to be assigned to Kern and Hammerstein's Show Boat (1927), or more typically
to Rodgers Oklahoma! (1943). Mark Grant, in The Rise and Pail of
and Hammerstein's
the Broadway Musical, observes that "Kern's melodies?attractive enough to soar yet
earthbound enough to be effectively sung on lyric?once tethered to dramatically
logical scripts, helped invent the modern book musical."18 Artists of the 1950s aimed
for an interdependence between the speech and song, as Leonard Bernstein wrote
in 1959: "The whole growth of our musical comedy can be seen through the growth
of integration, [which] demands that a song come out of the situation in the story
and make sense with the characters."19 Since then, musical theatre critics and
given
historians have analyzed and judged the sophistication of musicals based on their
integrative qualities.20
The tenets established by Rodgers and Hammerstein and their peers during the mid
twentieth century that characterize the book musical include a realist narrative (even in
a fantasy locale); an articulate and self-reflexive book; some kind of social commentary;
and nondiegetic dance numbers. Other conventions, which I'll discuss later in this
essay, include a leading character (especially a woman in Rodgers and Hammerstein)
who is both flawed and admirable; a romance whose development forms the spine of
the story; and a chorus that embodies the community and its values.
18
Mark N. Grant, The Rise and Fall of the Broadway Musical (Boston: Northeastern University Press,
2004), 31. For the purpose of this essay, I use the terms "book musical/' musical/7 and
"golden-age
"mid-twentieth-century musical" interchangeably. The formal quality of integration also became tied
to musical theatre's aspirations to be high art and to expose progressive social messages.
19
Leonard Bernstein, The Joy ofMusic (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1959), 164.
20 as well as the
The periodization and labeling of "the golden-age musical," "integration" narrative,
are in musical theatre historiography, even as I discuss here, recent scholarship
ubiquitous though,
strives to complicate or refute these and formalist Still, most scholars
historiographical assumptions.
view Kern, Hammer stein, or the team of Rodgers and Hammer stein as the key players in the form's
development. See, for example, Geoffrey Block, Enchanted Evenings: The Broadway Musical from Show
Boat to Sondheim (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 8-9; Grant, The Rise and Fall of the Broad
30-34; John Bush Jones, Our Musicals, Ourselves: A Social History
way Musical, of the American Musical
Theatre (Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press, 2003), 123-60; Larry Stempel, "The Musical Play
Expands," American Music 10 (1992): 136-69; Thomas L. Riis and Ann Sears, with William A. Everett,
"The Successors of Rodgers and Hammerstein from the 1940s to the 1960s," in The Cambridge Com
panion to theMusical, ed. William A. Everett and Paul R. Laird (New York: Cambridge University
Press, 2002), 137-66.
21
Raymond Williams, Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
they "accept" the practice of characters suddenly breaking out into song and dance?a
modal shift that the proponents of the integrated musical sought to alleviate.
between the numbers and the spoken scenes, as McMillin
The distinction observes,
marks the very essence of musical theatre, and he would agree that we understand
this convention intuitively. In The Musical as Drama?the first study systematically
to consider the musical as formally and functionally divided?McMillin argues that
songs can come out of the situation and make sense with the given characters without
the musical as a whole being the least bit integrated. In fact, he writes, the model of
to describe musical theatre is an utter misnomer.
integration mid-twentieth-century
Howsoever the Wagnerian total artwork has been valued and naturalized by musical
theatre historians, the very character of musical theatre is Brechtian and depends on
the different and differently operating components of music and speech. Identifying the
two defining practices of musical theatre as repetition and difference, McMillin explains
that repetition?both within musical numbers and between them?allows the musical
as a whole to take on a sound and the audience to
particular encourages anticipate
where a melody will go. Difference refers to the distinction between the book and the
musical numbers. The contrasting performance modes that each entails provide the
narrative and emotional scaffolding for the play. TheMusical as Drama underlines how
theatre artists' repeated use of these tools formed the set of performance conventions
we now as musical theatre.
identify
22
Miller, Place for Us, 3, 57.
23
Ibid., 3.
24
Knapp, The American Musical and the Formation of National Identity, 12-13.
What Virginia Wright Wexman writes about Hollywood films applies to Broadway
musicals also: on and romantic love is a function
"Hollywood's emphasis courtship
of the movies' within American?and indeed world?culture as a commercial
place
... it constitutes a cultural the conventions of which
enterprise. significant practice,
are related to the way we
live."25While the principals in amusical may begin as rivals
(Sarah Brown and Sky Masterson in Guys and Dolls) or as enemies (Eliza Doolittle and
Henry Higgins inMy Fair Lady) or as annoyances to each other (Maria and the Captain
in The Sound ofMusic) or, at best, in mutual misunderstanding (Nellie and Emile in
South Pacific), their differences of background or temperament signal that they will
eventually form a couple. Indeed, the ideological project of musical theatre in the United
States in the mid-twentieth century was to use the heterosexual couple's journey from
enemies to lovers to stand in for the unification of problematic differences inAmerican
culture?between the and the between work and leisure, between us and
city country,
them, between whites and racialized Others.26
Wicked works out its ideological struggle by constructing the two women as a ro
mantic couple within the conventions of musical theatre. Like mid-twentieth-century
musicals, Wicked "fashions amyth out of the American courtship ritual."27 Similarly, it
uses the women's distinctiveness and their ultimate union to do its liberal ideological
work, which here is to value individualism, integrity, and fairness over the desire for
fame and fortune at any cost. The women are constructed in opposites: pretty and ugly,
popular and outcast, dumb and smart, silly and political, femme and butch, white and
"colored." But while inmid-twentieth-century musicals the difference of gender at once
and overdetermines the differences of culture or in
undergirds couple's personality,
Wicked, the two women form a couple of both sameness and difference.
25
Virginia Wright Wexman, Creating the Couple: Love, Marriage, and Hollywood Performance (Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 4.
26
See, for example, Rick Altman, The American Film Musical (Bloomington: Indiana University Press,
1987); Richard Dyer, "The Sound of Music/' Movie 23 (1976-77): 39^9.
27
Altman, The American Film Musical, 27.
28 a
In now-classic article, Teresa De Lauretis argues that different skin color in two women characters
in film positions them as a lesbian couple; see her "Film and the Visible/' in How Do I Look?: Queer
Film and Video, ed. Bad Object-Choices (Seattle: Bay Press, 1991), 223-63.
In addition,
her father and peers' rejection of her is based on apparently understand
able disgust and horror; they judge her skin color not simply as different, but as a
disfigurement. Their moralizing is supported by the illicit circumstances of Elphaba's
conception?her mother's one-night, drug-induced affair (with, we later find out, the
Wizard)?that Glinda narrates in the first few minutes of the musical. At the same
time, the musical presents Elphaba's sister, Nessarose (Nessa), the wheelchair-bound
"tragically beautiful girl." Nessa's existence in the musical puts pressure on Elphaba's
meaning from the other side: the green girl is not disabled, just different. Nessa emerges
as what David Van Leer calls an "unintended Other."30 For a musical like Wicked that
works overtime to send a correct its use of as a
politically message, disability metaphor
for evil is, simply put, an ideological blind spot.31 Nessa begins as a sweet girl, but
eventually becomes the bitter and despotic governor of Oz. She is also desperately
in love with munchkin who loves Glinda?whom Nessa makes her slave-ser
Boq?a
Two potential ways of explaining Elphaba's difference, then, are displaced onto other
characters: the race of the Animals, and Nessa's disability. These gestures are necessary
29
In spite of the musical's effort to distance from the Animals, to many spectators she looks,
Elphaba
acts, and seems to act Jewish, and many women who have played Elphaba
are Jewish.
30
David Van Leer, The Queening of America (New York: Routledge, 1995), 157-201.
31
On the politics of representations of disability, see, for example, Robert McRuer, Crip Theory: Cul
tural Signs ofQueerness and Disability (New York: New York University Press, 2006); Rosemarie Garland
Thomson, "Narratives of Deviance and Delight: Staring at Julia Pastrana, the 'Extraordinary Lady/7' in
a
Beyond the Binary: Reconstructing Cultural Identity in Multicultural Context, ed. Timothy B. Powell (New
Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999), 81-104; Carrie Sandahl, "Ahhh Freak Out! Metaphors
of Disability and Femaleness in Performance," Theatre Topics 9, no. 1 (1999): 11-30.
for the musical to show that Elphaba's green skin makes her neither disabled nor of
a racial minority; she is solely a unique and special individual, the presumed subject
of the audience's identification and attachment. Wicked's producers, not surprisingly,
emphatically stress its universality, asserting that Elphaba's "difference" stands in for
all difference. As producer Mark Platt is frequently quoted as saying, "We all have a
green girl inside of us."
Wicked's script and spoken, visual, and embodied texts ground its fantasy setting in
concerns and the female as a brave individualist.
contemporary represent protagonist
But, as many scholars have noted, the key structuring convention in musical theatre
is the heterosexual romance plot, which the musical numbers follow and develop.
Those numbers follow a crucial order, as they are functional and construct the plot,
and serve not merely as decoration or distraction. Grant observes the importance of
the various components a
of musical, "but," he writes, "everything comes back to the
music."32 McMillin says: "The songs and dances intensify the dramatic number and
give it the special glow of performance."33 Composer Stephen Schwartz notes that in
Wicked, "many of the songs are structured to carry the story of the show."34
The Principals
32
Grant, The Rise and Fall of the Broadway Musical, 7.
33 as Drama, 52.
McMillin, The Musical
34
Stephen Schwartz, "Note from the Composer/' Wicked Piano/Vocal Selections (Milwaukee: Hal
Leonard), 9.
35
Elphaba, in contrast, uses proper grammar when she sings in 'The Wizard and I," "a girl on whom
I can rely." Thanks to Korey Rothman for pointing this out to me.
This song also introduces Glinda's relationship to Elphaba in language that under
lines its queerness. Before she departs, an Ozian asks, "Is it true that you knew her?"
and Glinda replies, "I did know her. That is, our paths did cross?at school. But you
must understand, itwas a long time ago and we were both very young." The first few
lines that explain her relationship to Elphaba suggest that itwas intimate and illicit,
and play out a double entendre from the beginning.
In contrast, Elphaba, from her first appearance, iswhat she seems to be. Her opening
song, "The Wizard and I," explains her character completely. She begins with:
Her number is fast and pulsing with a lightly syncopated accompaniment that gives
it drive, force, and movement. The song seems to hesitate and then build; the singer
conveys the sense of going back, taking a breath, and moving forward again. The
notes move up the scale, as Elphaba begins quietly convincing herself of her value
and then belts with complete confidence, her final note held long and loud. Elphaba's
first song is an "I am/I want" song, a typical form for an early, character-defining
song in a book musical. The number builds gradually verse by verse to become an "I
will/I can" song, very much like "I'm the Greatest Star" from Funny Girl. Schwartz, in
fact, said that he modeled Elphaba on Barbra Streisand as Fanny Brice in Funny Girl.37
The song tells the audience that she is a diva, a and ambi
visionary, independent,
tious?in spirit, the opposite of Glinda?and that she is a vulnerable girl who wants
to be pretty and popular and not green?in appearance, the opposite of Glinda. While
Glinda imitates the film's Good Witch, Elphaba's theme motive?the line, "unlimited,
my future"?contains the exact of notes as Harold Arien's line, "somewhere
sequence
over the rainbow." Here Schwartz subtly positions Elphaba as a Dorothy-like heroine.38
Howsoever Glinda and Elphaba are introduced as opposites, they both sing Elphaba's
signature phrase in several different songs, which signifies Glinda's (eventual) deep
understanding of her friend.
36
On the
typical sincerity of a character's first number, see Lehman Engel, Words with Music: The
Musical Libretto, 2nd ed. (New York: Schirmer Books, 1981 [1972]). All of Glinda's solos as a
Broadway
are sung in a range than her other numbers, how her political role
public figure higher emphasizing
is a performance.
37Marilyn Stasio, "Every Witch Way But Loose," Variety (26 April-6 May 2004).
38
Thanks to Holly Replogle-Wong for pointing this out to me.
forms of expression inmusical theatre (musical theatre scholars observe that a character
who does not sing in a musical is either dispensable or dead), a duet?the performa
tive force of two people singing together onstage?reveals the shape and tenor of the
As in many musicals, the duets trace,
relationship. mid-twentieth-century principals'
in sequence, their characters' developing romance; thus itmatters how frequently and
in what ways characters sing together. For example, in Carousel, Julie and Billy sing,
"If I Loved You"; in Guys and Dolls, Sky and Sarah sing, "I'll Know" and "I've Never
Been in Love Before"; in West Side Story, Maria and Tony sing, "Somewhere" and
name a few. As an oft-noted in South
"Tonight"?to extraordinary, exception, Pacific,
the principals sing no love duets, since Mary Martin refused to sing with the great
opera singer Ezio Pinza because she was intimidated by his voice. Nellie and Emile's
attachment is rendered in consecutive
musically songs?the "soliloquies"?and reprises.
The very need forMartin to explicitly refuse a duet, and Rodgers and Hammer stein's
willingness towrite another musical version of romance, underlines the importance of
the convention of the romantic duet in musical theatre, even by the late 1940s.
In Wicked, the number of duets between the principals is unusually high for any
romantic couple in a musical. The women's relationship, like those of the couples in
mid-twentieth-century musicals, is developed through these songs. Their first duet
(with which I opened this essay), "What Is This Feeling?" is acutely aware of and
plays on the conventions of earlier musical theatre. A musical's first romantic duet
tends to be a song in which the couple tries to express their lack of compatibility, but
since they do it by singing a duet?that is, by singing together as one?their perfor
mance contradicts the very animosity on which they insist. Songs like "People Will Say
We're in Love" from Oklahoma! and "If I Loved You" from Carousel are love songs in
the subjunctive; the lyrics express discord, but the characters' singing together unifies
them. InWicked, after a verse that sets the scene of the two girls each writing home
to family to complain about her roommate, they sing in snappy, alternating lines of
crisp eighth notes:
BOTH: / Unadulterated . . .
Loathing loathing
GLINDA: For your face . . .
ELPHABA: Your voice . . .
GLINDA: Your clothing . . .
BOTH: Let's just say?I loathe it all! (77)
The lyrics describe perfectly the feeling of falling in love, and yet the refrain turns
to their true feeling: "loathing." Although it is not actually a queer love song, the
number's energy and the mutual engagement of the women, who sing much of the
song in unison, link them passionately and set up the audience to be teased by queer
potential throughout the show. The number also underlines how performance moves
across time; we figure out what that song is about as it proceeds. Schwartz noted that
he wrote this song to function like "Ten Minutes Ago" from Cinderella, which is a mu
"approach and avoidance": the actors move close and then back off; they twirl around
each other like magnets. Like many romantic couples inmusical theatre, Elphaba and
Glinda at once hate each other and are irresistibly drawn to each other.
The next key moment in the women's relationship occurs through dance. Inmany
musicals, love is revealed in a dance scene?as in, for example,
golden-age big Rodgers
and Hammer stein's television musical of Cinderella, as well as inMy Fair Lady, West
Side Story, and The Sound ofMusic. InWicked, the number is not a lilting waltz, as it
typically is in a mid-twentieth-century musical a
(or quiet variation of a cha-cha, as
inWest Side Story), but rather is a pulsing pop song. Fiyero, the nominal male interest
in the show, opens the song, but then the chorus (students at Shiz University) and the
women take it over. In the musical's previous scene, Glinda has played a nasty joke
on Elphaba to emphasize her status among the other girls: she gives Elphaba a black
pointy hat and sings that "black is this year's pink" (pink is Glinda's cool, fashionable
color, although the show's overall design ismore green in hue?Elphaba's color40), but
hat is an a gift from her
the actually ugly accessory, grandmother, which Glinda doesn't
want. Since Elphaba has no fashion sense?because she is smart, a stereotype that the
musical invokes and then re-signifies?she accepts the gift to wear to the dance.
The scene
takes place at the Ozdust Ballroom, a disco of sorts where the entire
company, except for Elphaba, is dancing. Elphaba arrives late to the party, wearing
her version of party clothes?a drab dress and mismatched, brown lace-up boots?and
the unstylish hat, and she enters up center stage. All the kids stop dancing, turn to
stare, and start to laugh at her. She realizes immediately that she has been duped and
quickly removes the hat in embarrassment. But then she regains her poise and walks
slowly downstage center. She stops and deliberately puts back on the iconic, pointy
black hat, adding one more ingredient to her coming-into-focus image as the Wicked
Witch of the West. Then, still being watched, she begins to dance slowly, with undu
movements, alone in a of as the chorus fades into the
lating pool light background.
.
Glinda stands downstage right with Fiyero, who says, "Well [. .], she doesn't give a
twee what anyone else thinks." Glinda, though, is both guilt-stricken and attracted to
and after a moment she leaves him to join her. Glinda asks if she
Elphaba's bravery,
can cut in?a line both funny and sweet since Elphaba is dancing alone?and then
imitates movement. The two women dance in a movement
Elphaba's together, writhing
vocabulary completely unlike the rest of the show's choreography. This moment, the
most erotic in the show, looks like the scene inWest Side Story when Maria and Tony
see each other in the gym and everyone else fades into the background. The women
speak their own choreographed language, with Elphaba, the former underdog, leading.
As the song returns to the bright, be-boppy chorus, everyone in the company imitates
the choreography of the two women, and their union is celebrated in a dance that
extends to the whole community.
39
Quoted in Cote, Wicked: The Grimmerie, 77. Many of Schwartz's comments about his process
indicate that he is entirely aware that Wicked's structure is based on a
typical mid-twentieth-century
book musical.
40
Thanks to Korey Rothman for pointing out to me the dominance of green in the musical's de
sign.
Once the women's relationship is established, personal and social conflicts necessar
ensue, since a book musical, while a romantic
ily mid-twentieth-century concerning
couple's formation (which the audience readily anticipates), actually represents onstage
the obstacles to the relationship. As in the musicals of Rodgers and Hammerstein, the
couple's very struggle becomes the musical's content.41 Like Fanny Brice and Nick
Arnstein in Funny Girl, Eliza and Henry Higgins inMy Fair Lady, and Sarah Brown
and Sky Masterson in Guys and Dolls, Glinda and Elphaba are different in kind. In this
theatrical world of schoolgirls, their key difference is their popularity. Once they are
friends, Glinda decides that Elphaba is also her "project" and she sings the bedroom
number, "Popular."
This show-stealing song articulates many of the concerns of girls, and it uses the
trope of girls' bedroom makeover scenes common in films and television shows?as in
the movie Clueless, for example.42 Glinda's exuberant arrogance is both awkward and
sweet, as the number at once announces the elements of popularity and also gently
makes fun of them. She does a bumpy jet? and almost trips into a curtsy; she yodels
the last syllable of "popular"; and she sings multiple internal rhymes, which include
"tender heart" and "tends to start," "makeover" and "take over," "succeed," "lead,"
and "indeed," and and "the way viewed" and shrewd." To
"aptitude" you're "very
force a with "instead of . . . are," she the last
rhyme dreary who-you-were changes
. . . lar." In this
syllable of the frequently repeated word and sings, "Populer way, the
song's humor reveals the machinations of the alpha-girl and disempowers her, but
doesn't dismiss her, since Glinda's interest in her friend is heartfelt and her belief in
the power of popularity is genuine, even ingenuous. Moreover, even though the song is
technically a solo, in performance it requires Elphaba to be there: the address is crucial;
the song features an idea and a response, and Glinda's profound effect on Elphaba
(in spite of her desire not to care about being popular, she in fact does) comprises the
number's drama and emotion. When Elphaba, embarrassed, leaves at the end of the
song, the girls are bonded and friends.
The rest of the musical charts the women's connection through songs that divide
and unite them. "One Short for example, a celebration of their visit
Day," jazzy, bright
to the Emerald City, allows them to lead the ensemble in a homage to cosmopolitan
ism?to the museums, and dress salons?and to "It's all / I think
palaces, sing, green!
we've found the place where we belong!" in an overtly queer anthem: "So I'll be back
for good someday / To make my life and make my way" (155).
Even inWicked's numbers that stress their differences, the women interact musically
as they sing For example, when they go together to meet the Wizard and
together.
understand him for the power-wielding hypocrite that he is, Glinda wants to keep
quiet about the truth, but Elphaba rebels, as she expresses in her biggest number, the
act 1 finale, "Defying Gravity." The song's placement at the end of the act reveals how
the musical privileges Elphaba's values: her independence, determination, and willing
41
Joseph P. Swain, The Broadway Musical: A Critical and Musical Survey, 2nd ed. (Lanham, MD:
Scarecrow Press, 2002), 165-66. Swain attributes the audience's anticipation of heterosexual romantic
closure to "tradition."
42
See Mary Celeste Kearney, "Productive Girls' Bedrooms as Sites of Cultural Production,"
Spaces:
unpublished manuscript (2006).
By the end of the show the two women do part ways, but not before they reconcile
and sing "For Good," the last new song inWicked (that is, the last song that is not a
reprise) that cements their union. In this scene, Elphaba passes her book of spells to
Glinda, who, Elphaba insists, must educate herself and learn to speak the mysterious
and powerful language of magic. They sing, "Who can say if I've been changed for the
better? [...] Because I knew you ... / I have been changed for good" (176). This song,
like their other duets, places their voices in the same register, as if the music insists on
putting them in the same place. Emotionally and musically, the two are intertwined as
they switch between alto and soprano parts, each taking her turn to sing higher than
the other. share the melody and the and each woman's voice crosses
They harmony,
over the other's. Then they sing the last line in unison, ending together on the same,
note.43 The actors are left?a visual on
mid-range placed downstage strong position
stage?with the two women standing face to face, close and holding hands, singing
to each other. The visual image stresses their complementary differences, as Glinda
has blond curls and wears a white, sparkling ball-gown, while Elphaba, invariably
played by a taller actor, is dark, simply attired in a close-fitting though unrevealing
black dress, and, of course, The women to each other with
green-skinned. sing passion,
longing, and appreciation, and they end the number with a teary embrace. Although
Wicked's plot separates the women, the music continues to present them as unified
and as a
couple.
43
On the cast album they finish
on C
sharp; in the published vocal selections, the last note is amiddle
C. Either way, it is a comfortable, middle, solid note to sing.
44See Andrea Most, "'You've Got to Be Carefully The Politics of Race in Rodgers and
Taught':
Hammerstein's South Pacific," Theatre Journal 52 (2000): 307-37.
And here the show ends. Rather than the women finishing the line with "for good,"
the Company comes in after they sing "changed," pulls the women's line to a differ
ent key and concludes on the same powerful chord that ends the musical's opening
ensemble number. This conveys the musical's ambivalence and about
ending anxiety
its subject and meaning. Wicked wants to end on a note of harmony and tenderness
between the two women, who would sing "for good" and end together on middle C
as in the song's first rendition, but instead gives (or gives up?) the last chord of the
show to the dissonance of the community, who sing "wicked."
The ending of Wicked foregrounds how the musical both converses with and revises
other narrative and musical conventions of 1950s musicals, and thus or
reconfigures,
queers, the mid-twentieth-century's Cold War associations of those elements.
Many
musicals' finales, such as "Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin'" from Oklahoma! or "Seventy
Six Trombones" from A Music Man (1957), celebrate the community45 Within the world
of the musical, Wicked's finale also recognizes the community's centrality when the
company sings a reprise of "No One Mourns theWicked," which was the first song in
the show. As the plot comes full circle, though, the community is not idealized, roman
ticized, or even rendered neutral. Unlike the positive vision of American communities
during the Cold War era, the cynical twenty-first-century perspective represents politi
cal leaders as evil and weak and the community as an easily fooled mob. Whether the
ensemble students at Shiz or citizens of Oz, follow the charismatic leader
plays they
(or the popular girl) without question. When the citizens of Oz sing that "the Wicked
Witch is dead" joyfully though in aminor key, the audience sees them for the mindless
crowd that they are. Like almost all of the musicals of Rodgers and Hammerstein's era,
Wicked's finale unifies the community, but with irony and a critical slant.
In contrast to 1950s musicals, inwhich the principals and the ensemble are in sync,
Wicked's ending reveals their lack of correspondence?quite literally, their lack of
harmony. According to the theatrical conventions of mid-twentieth-century musical
theatre, the ensemble-affirming finale is either enabled by or incorporates the mar
riage of the principals. Because the principals stand in for conflicting values within the
community, their (heterosexual) union signifies the community's solidarity.46 Wicked's
45
See Jane Feuer, The Hollywood Musical (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993); McMillin,
The Musical as Drama, 78-101.
46 as the
On the heterosexual couple and the nuclear family symbol of the community in the Cold
War-era United States, see, for example, Elaine Tyler May, Homeward Bound: American Families in
queer "marriage" is private, spoken only between the women and impossible to be
revealed publicly. The principals must permanently separate because the community
refuses to tolerate their union. The audience, however, sees how Glinda, while serving
as the governor of Oz, mourns what she thinks is
Elphaba's death and remains apart
from the group. We have known throughout the show that the "Wicked Witch" is not
wicked, and we sympathize with Elphaba and view the community critically.
This law ordains that, though male and female alike may and indeed must appear on the
musical are not welcome there: the female performer will
stage, they equally always enjoy
the advantage of also being to represent this stage, as its its celebrant, it es
thought sign,
sence, and its glory; while the male tends to be suffered on condition that, by the inferiority
or of his own talents, he assist the enhancement of hers.51
subjection
the Cold War Era (New York: Basic Books, 1988). For the significance of the metaphor of containment
as embodied by the couple and the family, see Bruce McConachie, American Theater in the Culture of
the Cold War: Producing and Contesting Containment, 1947-1962 (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press,
2004).
47
Steyn, Broadway Babies Say Goodnight, 200.
48
Cote, Wicked: The Grimmerie, 46.
49
Miller, Place for Us, 73.
50Wexman, Creating the Couple, 143.
51
Miller, Place for Us, 71.
The relationships among Elphaba, Glinda, and Fiyero are variously triangulated,
with the women always emerging as the real couple. Fiyero and Glinda meet first and
declare themselves "perfect" and "perfect together," which alerts the audience that,
according to the conventions of musicals, they are not a perfect match at all. Rather,
Elphaba?his opposite in temperament and type?is meant to be his mate, since she
sees him for more than he is, and he comes to appreciate her uniqueness also inmuch
the same way that Glinda does. At different points in the show, Elphaba and Glinda
each sing "I'm Not That Girl" and grieve Fiyero's attraction for the other. While the
song sets up a parallel and underlines how both like him and
characterological they
both feel badly when he chooses the other girl (a slightly nauseating and conservative,
male-centered choice in a show that otherwise privileges women and their strength
and autonomy), the doubled performance of the song, like the women's duets, links
them musically. Fiyero may be the common subject, but the women are intimately tied
together through song. He is, as in L. Frank Baum's world of Oz, "the straw man."52
Although the plot informs us that Fiyero and Elphaba are lovers and permanent
partners, the performance itself continually undermines the power of their relation
ship, since their romance is barely represented onstage and therefore not substantiated
musical theatre's conventions of music or dance. Moreover, their one and
through only
duet, "As Long as You're Mine," is a typical pop love song with unspecific lyrics ("Just
for this moment / As long as you're mine / Come be how you want to / And see how
we shine") (170). The number is staged with the actors mid-center stage, kneel
bright
ing and then seated on the floor. For any performance, this location and position are
visually weak. But in a show like Wicked that so values height and verticality?Glinda
makes her entrance and exit by floating in and out on a bubble; Elphaba's biggest
number has her flying up, victorious at the end of act 1; and she even comes up and
out of the floor at the end of the show?placing the heterosexual couple on the floor
diminishes the power and believability of their importance.
When the audience applauds wildly after Wicked's final, powerful chord and an
instantaneous blackout, what is the target of their What is the that
appreciation? story
merits the approval of seven-year-old girls, their mothers and grandmothers? IfWicked
as I've here, a love between two women, has
quite overtly represents, argued story why
there been no on the musical's A few writers have noted the
commentary queerness?
musical's feminism or its less vibrant twin, girl power. Eve Ensler, for example, author
of The Vagina Monologues, praises Wicked as "the story of a complicated relationship
between two women, both of whom, in their way, suggest Everywoman."53
52
Thanks to Ray Knapp for pointing this out to me.
53
in Bruce Weber, "The Wicked New York Times (26 October 2:5.
Quoted Young Witches," 2003):
54
Jonathan Burston, 'The Megamusical: New Forms and Relations in Global Production/' quoted
inWalsh and Platt, "Modernity, Globalization, and the Megamusical/' 157.
The affective power of Wicked?or any musical that succeeds commercially?is what
ultimately touches audiences. D. A. Miller writes that "[t]he stuff of mass culture (as
our first culture) conducts psychic flows with an efficiency that the superior material
of no second, later culture ever comes close to rivaling. It is by way of Shane, not
Sophocles or Freud, that Oedipus stalks our dreams, just as the Beach Boys have a
power of refreshing our memories unknown to Brahms."57 Critics' preoccupation with
spectacle and marketing causes them to miss that the political punch of this musical
what in relation to musical theatre's formal conventions: two
regards happens onstage
women form a primary relationship and sing and dance together; in other words, the
progressive power of the piece is not in the overtly stated politics of the show about
government and leadership, but is rather in the representation and performative power
of a of women Some see them as friends; others as co
pair onstage together.58 may
conspirators; still others as competitors. But if one sees them through the conventions
of musical theatre upon which Wicked is built, they look like a queer couple.
InNew Broadways, Gerald Berkowitz writes: "This point is so important... you have
to the audience," whether this means "an audience what it wanted," or
please giving
guiding "an audience, carefully and gradually, into wanting what was offered."59 Still,
Susan Bennett argues that "entertainment retail might be driven by its commitment to
55
Richard Dyer, "Entertainment and Utopia," in Only Entertainment (New York: Routledge, 1992),
18.
56 on the internet, see Stacy Wolf,
On Wicked's girl fans and their activity "Wicked Divas, Musical
Theater, and Internet Girl Fans," Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies 22, no. 2 65
(2007): 39-71.
57
Miller, Place for Us, 68.
58
See Sally Banes, Dancing Women: Female Bodies on Stage (New York: Routledge, 1998); Carolyn
Abbate, Unsung Voices: Opera and Musical Narrative in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, 1991); Stacy Wolf, "'We'll Always Be Bosom Buddies': Female Duets and the Queering
of Broadway Musical Theatre," GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 12, no. 3 (2006): 351-76.
59 a New Millennium, rev.
Gerald M. Berkowitz, New Broadways: Theatre Across America: Approaching
ed. (New York: Applause, 1997), 235.
sell things, but that does not stop its producers from at least imagining that they can
achieve an effect we have often reserved for accounts of socially or politically moti
vated performance?changing the lives of audiences."60 Rodgers and Hammerstein
and their peers knew this, which is why Broadway musicals were both commercially
successful and politically influential during and since the Cold War. Wicked, by using
the conventions of golden-age musical theatre in the twenty-first century and placing
two women at the center to make, so far, the biggest hit of this century, might simul
taneously please its audience and guide them to want a queer and feminist Broadway
musical theatre.
60
Bennett, "Theatre / Tourism/7 422.