Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Team Objectives
The team process can be a highly effective, people-building, potential-releasing,
goal-achieving social system that is characterized by:
Listed below are some of the reasons that teams have been successful in many
companies:
. The team procedure allows all team members to communicate and exercise
creative expression.
Team Empowerment
Most power is derived from the organization's management authority. A team is
empowered by virtue of that power that is granted to it by management. A team
charter is a very useful tool for helping a team and management understand just
exactly what the team is empowered to do.
Team members have control over the team's performance and behavior. Control is
one source of power. lnformation is another source of power. To be effective, teams
need information. Teams should be told everything that could possibly help them
to achieve their objectives. They should be aware of financial conditions,
organizational changes, market conditions, etc. Access to resources is a third
source of power. A team's ability to succeed will depend in part on how free it is to
use organizational resources.
Management Support
Management must give more than passive team support. This means that
management, especially mid-management, must be educated to the degree that they
are enthusiastic about the team concept. The implementation of project schedules
and solutions originating from teams should be given precedence. ln order for
teams to be successful, management must recognize that there will be additional
work created by their efforts. Leaders, facilitators and team members should be
thoroughly trained in six sigma and other improvement techniques, as required.
ln spite of the potential benefits, some people are skepticalof the long-term success
of teams. These people point out that the traditional style of management in the
typical American industry carries with it such momentum that the team approach will
have little appreciable long-term effect.
There are reasonable arguments that can be expressed either for or against teams.
The important questions that need answers are: (1) Does the company have the
proper environment in which teams can survive and thrive? and (21 Does
management fully comprehend the value of teamsn to make them work?
Types of Teams
The following types of teams are used by industries throughout the world today:
It should be noted that not all companies, lauded to have effective six sigma
programs, follow the same structure as presented in eitherASQ's CSSBB or CSSGB
BOKs. Many companies use a variety of team arrangements and provide black belt
and master black belt support as necessary.
lmprovement Teams
A group belonging to any department chooses to solve a quality/productivity
problem. lt will continue until a reasonable solution is found and implemented. The
problem may be management selected, but the solution is team directed.
Team membership can be all management, all work area, or a composite of the two.
Usually, the boundaries of the assignment are tightly drawn for project teams or ad
hoc teams. Some task forces may have broader mandates.
This type of team operates with minimal day-to-day direction from management.
Self-directed teams are asked to accomplish objectives within time frames that are
truly stretch objectives. Management must give the team the maximum latitude
possible to achieve their objectives.
Quality Teams
The quality circle approach has been on the decline in the USA for some time. A
variety of quality team nomenclatures have replaced the term "quality circle." The
major reasons forthe shift appearto be two-fold. First, the term "quality circle" has
a strong Japanese connotation. And secondly, most circle projects tend to be
employee selected, while most team efforts are management selected, but team
directed.
Team Stages
Most teams go through four development stages before they become productive:
forming, storming, norming, and performing. These stages can also be cyclical.
lndividuals may be storming with one teammate and performing with another. Bruce
W. Tuckman (1965)38 first identified the four development stages.
Forming
Forming is the beginning of team life. Expectations are unclear. Members test the
water. lnteractions are superficial. This is the honeymoon stage. When a team
forms, its members typically start out by exploring the boundaries of acceptable
group behavior. As each member makes the transition from individual to team
member, each looks to the team leader (or facilitator) for guidance as to his or her
role and responsibilities.
Storming
The second phase consists of conflict and resistance to the group's task and
structure. There are healthy and unhealthy types of storming. Conflict often occurs
in the following major areas: authority issues, vision and values dissonance, and
personality and cultural differences. However, if dealt with appropriately, these
stumbling blocks can be turned into performance later.
This is the most difficult stage for any team to work through. Teams realize how
much work lies ahead and feel overwhelmed. They want the project to move forward
but are not yet expert at team improvement skills. They often cling to their own
opinions, based on personal experience, and resist seeking the opinions of others.
This can lead to hurt feelings and unnecessary disputes. A disciplined use of the
quality improvement process and the proper tools and communication skills can
assist teams members to express their various theories, lower their anxiety levels,
and reduce the urge to assign blame.
Norming
During the third phase, a sense of group cohesion develops. Team members use
more energy on data collection and analysis as they begin to test theories and
identify root causes. Members accept other team members and develop norms for
resolving conflicts, making decisions, and completing assignments. Norming takes
place in three ways. First, as storming is overcome, the team becomes more relaxed
and steady. Conflicts are no longer as frequent and no longer throw the team off
course. Second, norming occurs when the team develops a routine. Scheduled
team meetings give a sense of predictability and orientation. Third, norming is
cultivated through team-building events and activities. Norming is a necessary
transition stage. A team can't perform if it doesn't norm.
This is the payoff stage. The group has developed its relationships, structure, and
purpose. The team begins to tackle the tasks at hand. The team begins to work
effectively and cohesivety. During this stage, the team may still have its ups and
downs. Occasionally, feelings that surfaced during the storming stage may recur.
Refer to Figure 4.12lor a graphical display of the performance of teams as they
advance through the team evolutionary stages.
Performinq
Members:
show maturity
focus on the process
achieve goals
operate smoothly
Norminq
Members:
cooPerate
talk things out
o focus on obiectives
(, have fewer conflicts
E
G
E Storminq
o
L Members:
o have confrontation
0. think individually
are learning roles
have divided loyalties
Forming
Members are:
inexperienced
excited
anxious
proud
Time
Adjourning
At the end of most six sigma projects the team disbands. This step is called
adjourning to rhyme with four other team stages (forming, storming, norming and
performing). Adjourning is also a very common practice for non six sigma
companies in regard to project teams, task forces and ad hoc teams.
The definitions in this portion of the Primer are a combination of the author's
experience and references at the end of this Section.
Black Belts
Six sigma black belts are most effective in full-time process improvement positions.
The term black belt is borrowed from the martial arts, where the black belt is the
expert who coaches and trains others as well as demonstrates a mastery of the art.
ln a similar way, six sigma black belts are individuals who have studied and
demonstrated skill in implementation of the principles, practices, and techniques of
six sigma for maximum cost reduction and profit improvement.
Six sigma black belts typically demonstrate their skill through significant positive
financial impact and customer benefits on multiple projects. Black belts may be
utilized as team leaders responsible for measuring, analyzing, improving and
controlling key processes that influence customer satisfaction and/or productivity
growth. Black belts may also operate as internal consultants, working with a
number of teams at once. They may also be utilized as instructors for problem
solving and statistics classes. Black belts are encouraged to mentor green belt and
black belt candidates.
Executive Sponsors
Executive sponsorship is a key element in an effective black belt program.
Executive leadership sets the direction and priorities for the organization. The
Executive Team is comprised of the leaders that will communicate, lead and direct
the company's overall objectives towards successful and profitable six sigma
deployment. Executives typically receive training that includes a six sigma program
overview, examples of successful deployment and strategies, and tools and methods
for definition, measurement, analysis, improvement, and control.
Champions
Six sigma champions are typically upper level managers that control and allocate
resources to promote process improvements and black belt development.
Champions are trained in the core concepts of six sigma and deployment strategies
used by their organizations. With this training, six sigma champions lead the
implementation of the six sigma program. Ghampions also workwith black belts to
ensure that senior management is aware of the status of six sigma deployment.
Champions ensure that resources are available for training and project completion.
They are involved in all project reviews in their area of influence.
Process Owners
Key processes should have a process owner. A process ownercoordinates process
improvement activities and monitors progress on a regular basis. Process owners
work with black belts to improve the processes for which they are responsible.
Process owners should have basic training in the core statistical tools but will
typically only gain proficiency with those techniques used to improve their individual
processes. ln some organizations, process owners may be six sigma champions or
sponsors.