Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
QNET - CFD
Application Challenge
Cyclonic Separator
Presented
by
Dr. Michael Slack
Contents
• Introduction
• how it works
• Typical applications
• Relevance to industrial sector
• Complexities of the flow and modelling approach which may be
taken.
• The Application Challenge
• Experimental Test Case
• CFD Modelling Solution Strategies
• Development of best practice
• Boundary conditions
• Validation of turbulence models
• Numerical accuracy
• Comparison with experimental results
• Conclusions and sensitivity discussion (LES findings)
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
The Cyclone
• The cyclone is a separation device that induces swirl rotation in a liquid and
therefore imposes an enhanced radial acceleration on a particulate or liquid
suspension for the purpose of separation or classification. When applied to
liquids they are termed hydrocyclones.
• Uses
• Particle Classifier
• Phase Separation
• Thickener
• Example applications
• Mineral Processing (Sorting course material from fine in grinding circuits)
• Oil Industry (oil water, sand and gas separation)
• Cement Industry (reactor, classifier and dust extraction)
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Overflow
Fine
Vortex Finder
Dust in Slurry In
Inlet
Inlet
Underflow
Coarse
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Advantages
•Easy of use
•High volume throughput
•Simple and Compact mechanical design
•Reliable
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
cl cl cl
Vortex finder
Illustration of how the tangential velocity profile consists of both free
and forced vortex swirl
Inlet
v
= cons tan t
r
Tangential velocity
+ ve
Wall
Apex
0
cl cl cl Radius
•Physical modelling
•Numerical modelling
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Modelling complexities
•Physical
•Large number of influencing parameters
•Numerical
•The elliptic partial differential equations governing fluid flow are
non- linear and when swirl is present strongly coupled.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Modelling Approaches.
• Analytical Modelling
• Improves awareness of the physical mechanics involved but can only be applied to simple geometry's
• Bloor, M.I.G. and Ingham, D.B., 1973, 1986 Leeds University.
• Batchelor, G. K., 1967, An introduction to fluid dynamics, Cambridge University Press, pp. 543-547.
• Numerical modelling
• Allows a wider scope of boundary conditions to be applied and is much more flexible.
• Workers in this field:
F. Boysan 1984
Pericleous, K. A. and Rhodes, N., 1984, 1986.
Davidson, M. R., 1988.
Hargreaves, J. H. and Silvester, R. S., 1990.
Rajamani, R. K. et al., 1990, 1992.
Dyakowski, T. and Williams, R.A., 1993.
Fernando Concha A., 1997.
Slack, M. D. and Wraith A. E., 1997.
Slack, M. D. and F. Boysan. 1998.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Turbulence Modelling
Engineers are not interested in the details of the turbulent motions
but on the mean properties of the flow.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
• Which one ?
• Prandtl Mixing length model
• Treat the N-S Equations as lamina but solve them for a modified turbulent viscosity derived from a
prandtl mixing length model
• Eddy Viscosity Models
• 2-equation k-epsilon model.
• Renormalisation group [RNG] k-epsilon model.
• Second Moment Closure Models
• Uses differential transport equations to solve the stresses at each point in the system, eg. The Reynolds
Stress Model [RSM].
• Large Eddy LES !
• Current state of the art Research level turbulence model. Transient calculation on a fine mesh to solve
the large eddies directly with a sub-grid scale model to represent those eddies smaller than the mesh and
faster than the time step.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Tangential velocity profiles at 0.41 m below the vortex finder predicted using
SKE, RNG and RSM compared with experimental data.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Axial velocity profiles at 0.41 m below the vortex finder predicted using
SKE, RNG and RSM compared with experimental data.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
0.1m 0.103m
0.103m 0.308m
0.32m 0.04m
0.35m
0.38m
0.41m 0.205m
0.82m
0.59m
0.62m
0.66m
0.77m
0.80m
0.074m
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Model Inputs
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Experimental Strategy
•
• LDA tangential and axial Velocity measurements recorded on
radial lines at vertical distances 0.32, 0.38, 0.41, 0.59, 0.62,
0.66, 0.77, 0.8 m from top of cyclone.
• Closest approach to walls 0.00924 m
• Error on peak velocities are estimated to be ± 0.25 m/s
• Experimental results were presented by Ayers et al. 1983,
Theoretical modelling of cyclone performance, Filtech
Conference
Inflow
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Tangential Axial
0 cm
32
35
38
41
59
62
66
35 m/s
14 m/s
77
80 0 0
Tangential and axial profiles predicted at all the experimental axial locations.
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Position 32. Axial & tangential velocity experimental v Predicted .
MDS 16/05/01
–— CFD, ∆ experiment [LDA]
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Position 38. Axial & tangential velocity experimental v Predicted .
MDS 16/05/01
–— CFD, ∆ experiment [LDA]
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Position 59. Axial & tangential velocity experimental v Predicted .
MDS 16/05/01
–— CFD, ∆ experiment [LDA]
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Position 77. Axial & tangential velocity experimental v Predicted .
MDS 16/05/01
–— CFD, ∆ experiment [LDA]
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Conclusions Discussion
A best practice approach for cyclonic flow modelling has
produced.
This documented has been compiled based on modelling
experience in this area.
The RSM turbulence combined with high order
discretisation schemes provides an engineering tool suitable
for this type of flow problem. And can give satisfactory
results on relatively course meshes.
But what about sensitivity to grid density and more
advanced turbulence models ? (LES) ?
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
Problem Description
• Hexahedral mesh of 700,000
cells
• QUICK discretization scheme
• Second-order time marching
scheme
• LES-RNG subgrid model
• Time step = 100 µs
• 4 days of CPU time on an 8-
Processor HP machine
MDS 16/05/01
Application Challenge – Cyclone Separator QNET 2002
LES
Cyclone
Animations
MDS 16/05/01
Velocity magnitude Axial vorticity Velocity vectors
Comparison between the tangential velocity at various stations as predicted by the RSM model, the time averaged LES
results, and the experimental data (∆ Experimental data; RSM model; - - - Time averaged LES results).
MDS 16/05/01