Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1564
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 08 | Aug -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Objectives:
1. To examine experimentally the behavior of RC
corbel using externally bonded Glass FRP sheets
under monotonic loading.
2. To examine failure pattern of corbel
Fig.2.Design parameter of corbel
Methodology:
The two control unplated corbel (CC) failed at an ultimate
1. Material information and preliminary test.
load. Then take the average load of these corbels as the
There are three types of fiber which is mostly
ultimate load. The corbels failed in conventional ductile
used for confinement. Their name and major
flexure with yielding of the tension steel, followed by
properties are as follows
crushing of the concrete in the compression zone.
Properties of FRP:
Mix Design:
The main properties of Carbon, Aramid and E-Glass
The bureau of Indian Standard, recommended a set of
fibers are given in Table1.
procedure for design of concrete mix, mainly based on the
work done in national laboratories. The mix design
Table 1: Properties of FRP
procedure is covered in IS: 10262:2009. The method given
can be applied for both medium strength and high
Type of fiber strength concrete.
Sr.
Property 2.1. Nomenclature of specimens
No. E-
Carbon Aramid
Glass
The test specimens were divided into five
Tensile Strength 4300 - 3200- 600 - groups including control beam group. Remaining four
1
(MPa) 4900 3600 1800 groups were classified based upon the wrapping
technique, and material used for wrapping.
Modulus of 230 - 124
2 55 - 70
Elasticity (GPa) 240 130 Table.2.Nomenclature of corbel.
3.2 -
3 Strain at failure (%) 1.9 - 2.0 2.5 - 2.8
3.6 Sr.No. Nomenclature Descriptions.
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1565
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 08 | Aug -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
3. Result and Discussion specimen for carbon fibre wrapping, 23.2% for diagonal
wrapping and 9.2%for horizontal wrapping.
The testing of corbel is carried out in College of 4. When corbel was wrapped with glass fibre ultimate load
Engineering Pune consist of The oldest UTM machine was found to be 596.907kN for diagonal wrapping and
Having capacity 1780KN.The readings are in the form of 549.867kN for horizontal wrapping. I.e. Glass fibre
pounds and dial gauge ranges from 0-12.7mm.having list wrapping increases ultimate load compared to control
count 0.01mm and following results are obtained: specimen, 16.3%for diagonal wrapping and 7.1%for
horizontal wrapping.
600
250
200 500
400
Ultimate Load in kN
150
100 300
50 200
0
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0
Deformation in mm
450
400
a. Load carrying capacity of corbels. 350
The graphical discussion on Ultimate load v/s corbels 300
250
concluded following result. 200
1. The control specimen has 513.191kN failure load which 150
is more than first crack load. 100
2. The load capacity is more when corbel is wrapped with 50
0
carbon fibre as compared to glass fiber.
3. When the corbel was wrapped with carbon fiber
ultimate load was found as 632.248kN.for diagonal Corbels
wrapping and 560.476kN for Horizontal wrapping.i.e. The
load carrying capacity is increased compared to control Graph.4.1st Crack Carrying Load v/s Corbels.
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1566
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 08 | Aug -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
300 CC REFERENCES
250 DGFRP
200 DCFRP [1] Grace N. F., Abdel-Sayed G. and Ragheb W. F.,
150
HGFRP
Strengthening of concrete Beams using Innovative
100 ductile Fiber-reinforced Polymer fabric ACI
HCFRP
50 structural Journal, Vol.99, No.5, 2002, Pp-692-700.
0
0 2 4 6 8 [2] Guadagnini M.,CiupalaM.andPilakoutas K. Fiber
Deformation in mm Reinforced Polymers in Concrete Structures Ovidius
University Annals Series: Civil Engineering, Volume 1,
Graph.4.Comparision between CC v/s Corbels. Number 5, 2003, Pp-149-154.