Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Cian McDermott
CST 373: Ethics in Comms & Tech
10/2/2016
Volkswagen: Directing Attention Towards Automotive Fraud
technology. Currently, I am enrolled in CSU Monterey Bay's two-year online program for those
majoring in Computer Science, which started in the Spring of 2016. I had started community
college in 2011 and had been completing many classes that were heavy in programming, math,
and science, to transfer to a university where I could graduate with a Bachelor Science degree,
and become part of the programming field. For this paper, we will be discussing the recent
incident in the past year involving the Volkswagen vehicle manufacturer. Before conducting
research, I had heard how the company had essentially "cheated" on their newer vehicles'
emissions test, making them out to be more eco-friendly than they were in reality. As a result,
they would be suffering from a rather serious lawsuit for false advertising and potentially
endangering the environment. Their irresponsible actions and lack of foresight would
permanently damage the company's reputation, as well as lose the trust of their consumers and
sponsors.
The Germany-based Volkswagen automotive company has a history that goes back into
the days of World War II. Volkswagen, originally called "Gesellschaft zur Vorbereitung des
Deutschen Volkswagens mbH," was established by Nazi Germany as part of Adolf Hitler's
"aim...to create a 'people's car'...costing no more than a motorbike to buy" in a time when very
little German citizens actually owned cars (Bowler, 2015). As a company based in Germany and
founded before the war, it should come to no surprise that, upon World War II, "the firm
McDermott 2
[switched] to making vehicles for the German army, using more than 15,000 slave labourers
from nearby concentration camps. It is a practice that is widespread among German firms during
the war" (Bowler, 2015). Despite this rather bleak footnote on the company's early history, recent
years have made it one of the most respective automotive companies worldwide. Unfortunately,
this scandal may have given it a worse reputation than it could have had for its practices back
then.
For the past few years, in part due to the concerns of global warming, car manufacturers
have been trying to make their vehicles more eco-friendly, such as with Hybrid cars. In order to
vehicles' environmental friendliness with an engine that gives low emission ratings. However, in
September of 2015, it was discovered by the Environmental Protection Agency that "many VW
cars being sold in America had a 'defeat device'...in diesel engines that could detect when they
were being tested, changing the performance accordingly to improve results....Once on the roads,
the engines switched out of this test mode. The result? The engines emitted nitrogen oxide
pollutants up to 40 times above what is allowed in the US" (Hotten, 2015). In addition, VW has
been accused by the EPA of selling "420,000 cars in the US [alone]" on the premise of their low
emission, "modifying software on the 3 litre diesel engine engines fitted to some Porsche and
Audi...which affect at least 10,000 vehicles" (Hotten, 2016). According to an NPR report by
Glinton, the scandal was discovered thanks to a West Virginia University professor; the
researcher, Arvind Thiruvengadam, "[did] real-world testing of diesel vehicles" and was told that
"things were really low on the chassis, but [they didn't] see the same trend on the road" (Glinton,
2015).
McDermott 3
With such drastic results to the investigation being revealed, the general public, in
addition to the EPA, were furious. After the scandal was revealed, the American Volkswagen
chief executive, Michael Horn, admitted that they were at fault, and Chief executive Martin
Winterkorn resigned from his position and was replaced by Matthias Mueller as a result of
"[breaking] the trust of [their] customers and the public" (Hotten, 2016). In addition to the
company setting aside "6.7 [billion]" to cover the cost of recalling the millions of cars released
worldwide, "the EPA has the power to fine a company up to $37,500 for each vehicle that
breaches standards - a maximum fine of about $18 [billion]" (Hatton, 2016). This, however, does
not even cover the fines they will no doubt have to pay as a result of various lawsuits due to their
irresponsible actions.
There is one major question relating to the scandal that VW themselves have yet to
answer: what motivation did they have for going so far as to cheat these tests? The simple
answer would be money; according to Shelton from hybridCars.com, "over the last decade,
Volkswagen had been struggling to gain a solid footing in the U.S. diesel market. The perception
that diesel emitted more pollution than gasoline engines, tumultuous diesel fuel prices and the
cost of diesel technology proved challenging to overcome" (Shelton, 2015). Despite this
perception towards diesel fuel, there are companies that do manage to sell such cars thanks to
how they design their diesel engines. All VW had to do was convince the public that their cars
were just as low-emission as the rest, if not more. However, despite their "clean diesel"
advertisement strategy, their sales numbers dropped 22 percent in June 2014, and "the cost of
efficient diesel engines was chipping away at its profits" (Shelton, 2015). As much as they tried
to create a cost-effective method of marketing cleaner vehicles, the fact remains that the
development of more efficient technology takes money. Volkswagen made the assumption that
McDermott 4
they would go under before they managed to create a worthwhile profit from their line of clean
This scandal came to light due to the American EPA's intervention, but how did this
scandal get past the regulators in Europe, where VW's main branch is located? According to the
New York Times, "European regulators are notoriously more lax in their testing" and "the
trickery may not have been illegal in Europe, where auto manufacturers can apparently
determine engine settings for pollution testing, making sure their test cars will pass even if the
cars on the road never would" (The Editorial Board, 2016). If cheating these kinds of tests is
common practice in Europe, then this scandal raises even more outrage at foreign auto industries
as a whole. However, this scandal is based around the emitted nitrogen oxide, which "lead to
respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, smog and acid rain, and cause premature deaths" and
how the auto industry has been lying about them (The Editorial Board, 2016). While these details
should be obvious, "VW and quite possibly other automakers seems unable to understand
that from the publics point of view, the problem was not so much cheating on tests as
concealing the threat that its cars posed to the health of the public" (The Editorial Board, 2016).
One could possibly take away from this is that, due to a lax approach to these environmental
safety tests, European auto makers are more ignorant to how big a concern environmental
pollution is to the general public. Matthias Mueller, Volkswagen's new chief executive, appears
earnest in trying to restore the company's reputation, but so long as VW sees the solution as
compensating their consumers, rather than trying to find a solution to the problem with their
high-emission engines, it may take too long for their reputation to recover.
Although this was a rather damning scandal, VW's emissions test was not the only
automotive scandal in the past year. Outside of Europe, the Japanese company Mitsubishi
McDermott 5
Motors admitted last April that they "had manipulated fuel economy tests affecting hundreds of
thousands of vehicles in Japan" by producing mileage results driving their cars downhill "and the
company admitted the flawed testing goes back a quarter century" (Mullen, 2016). Despite the
results not being as severe, Mitsubishi still "expects to post a net loss of 145 billion yen ($1.4
billion) for the current financial year" in addition to forcing two executives to resign and their
stock prices falling (Mullen, 2016). Although far from the extremely polluting nature of VW's
cars, their poor ethics seem to have brought to light many other cases where car manufacturers
The public's reaction to the scandal has varied over time, both in intensity and the number
of people outraged. One article by the Harvard Business Review points out some analysses on
various Twitter responses related to Volkswagen, like after an article from The Guardian
"revealed that the scandal has affected 1.2 million Volkswagen diesel vehicles," which caused
the number of tweets to increase noticeably (Swaminatha & Mah, 2016). There were several
other instances where related tweets increased around the time of other articles which brought
new information to light. The amount of negative remarks towards Volkswagen was around its
highest at the beginning, around September 29 to October 7; these negative tweets began to
slowly die down until January 4, when "the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint against
the company" (Swaminath & Mah, 2016). If the media does have any bias towards this scandal,
it is definitely a negative one towards Volkswagen, and for good reason. Volkswagen could have
Aside from the media, there are many people, the American E.P.A. and those who
purchased any of Volkswagen's recent vehicles being the biggest among them, who are
concerned about this issue. As stated earlier in this essay, their main concerns regarding this
McDermott 6
scandal lies in the fact that these cars' engines are far from being considered safe from the
environment, given the amount of pollution their engines produce compared to what is
considered legal for vehicles in the United States. Although the American E.P.A. and judicial
system are the most vocal in their disapproval of VW's actions, this scandal has even caused
recalls for their cars in other nations, so this scandal is far from isolated in the U.S. alone. Almost
every major group involved in this scandal are against Volkswagen due to their actions; the one
other group being Volkswagen themselves, who are trying to fix this issue in order to return to
their customers' good graces. However, their missteps in several actions to improve Public
Relations only exacerbated problems. These missteps began with former executive Winterkorn
underplaying their involvement by referring to their cheating as "the mistakes of a few people"
and resigning while claiming "I am not aware of any wrongdoing on my part" (Joshi & Hakim,
2016). Some time later, they tried to appease their customers with $1000 incentives, but then
British executive Willis states that "British VW owners, and those in other European countries,
will not receive such good-will payments" (Joshi & Hakim, 2016). Overall, this scandal has dealt
a serious wound to their reputation, so they are not likely to recover from this for several years,
whether or not they get their act together in regards to appeasing the vocal dissenters.
The three ethical frameworks I will be using to analyze VW's actions will be Self
Interest, Cultural Relativism, and Utilitarianism. The Self Interest Perspective states that a
business has only one responsibility: "to use its resources and engage in activities designed to
increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game...without deception or fraud"
(Cahill). From this perspective, one can clearly define VW's actions as unethical, as they have
committed fraud. They had purposely programmed their cars to appear environmentally friendly
while being tested, in order to hide their product's severe pollution. All the while, the company
McDermott 7
had been advertising their cars as low-emission and environmentally friendly, not only lying to
According to Cultural Relativism, "ethical judgment [is based] on societal norms, or the
law" (Cahill). As stated in the second and third paragraphs of this paper, their cars' engines have
been producing pollutants several times over the U.S.'s legal limit, and as a result, the E.P.A.
exercised their right to fine Volkswagen for their actions. When pressed about the scandal, the
company tried to pass the buck by claiming that using methods like their defeat device are not
strictly illegal in European testing. "A month later, German regulators, however, say the devices
constitute illegal cheating on emissions in Europe, too" (Joshi & Hakim, 2016). Whether or not it
is considered illegal in Europe, the fact remains that they tried to sell polluting machines in
countries that have strict guidelines about how much toxic emissions a vehicle can produce. The
actions of the government agency, as well as the response from the general public, brings very
little doubt that what VW did was unethical based on Cultural Relativism.
So far, these ethical frameworks have deemed Volkswagen's actions as unethical based
on a business and legal perspective. Utilitarianism claims a decision is considered wrong "when
a decision harms the greatest number of people involved" (Cahill). From a broad perspective, the
air pollution caused by their vehicles so far could only harm everyone in the long term. If their
engines produce forty times more pollution than what is considered legal in our country, then
imagine the possible damage if the programming of their engines were not discovered.
According to Roose, a Guardian analysis stated that roughly one million tonnes of nitrogen oxide
would be produced annually worldwide if this scandal was not discovered, and expands on this
to state "Volkswagen introduced as much pollution to the atmosphere as if it had built 25 exact
replicas of Western Europes largest power plant, and let them all run around the clock, invisible
McDermott 8
to regulators and the public" (Roose, 2015). There is no other way to put this other than that
Volkswagen could have caused irreparable damage to our atmosphere if left alone. Even if we do
not consider the long term, there are immediate concerns due to secondhand exposure to the
produced emissions. After all, the nitrogen oxide produced by diesel engines "lead to respiratory
and cardiovascular illnesses, smog and acid rain, and cause premature deaths" (The Editorial
Board, 2016). From my research so far, it is extremely difficult to claim that what Volkswagen
has done can be considered ethical in any way. Analysis from three different perspectives could
not produce any leeway to say that their actions are anywhere close to being in the right.
The Volkswagen emission scandal has drawn attention from everyone for months since
its discovery, and their reputation is sure to suffer in the years to come. The damage to their
reputation is so bad that so far, "the carmaker's shares have fallen by about a third since the
scandal broke" (Hotten, 2016). In addition, this scandal has brought attention to other
manufacturers based in Europe; "Ford, BMW and Renault-Nissan have said they did not use
'defeat devices', while other firms have either not commented or simply stated that they comply
with the law," but Hotten points out that, according to the SMMT (United Kingdom's Society of
Motor Manufacturers and Traders), the emissions testing performed in Europe is "outdated and is
seeking...a new emissions test that embraces new testing technologies and is more representative
of on-road conditions" (Hotten, 2016). If there is anything positive one could say about the
scandal, it is that it seems to have convinced people to step up on regulating protocol on testing.
If this could bring to light other evidence of cheating from other auto companies, it could prevent
future incidents that could speed up global warming or other consequences of air pollution.
It is apparent the reveal that Volkswagen cheated during their cars' emissions test has
affected the automotive industry as a whole. In addition, this scandal will affect Germany's
McDermott 9
economy, because "making quality cars is central to the country's reputation as a manufacturing
and export powerhouse. The auto industry accounts for about 20% of exports, and employs
775,000 people directly" (Thompson & Kottasova, 2015).Although not as drastic a drop as
Volkswagen, other manufacturers' stock values had declined in response to the scandal.
According to CNN Money, "The scandal dragged down shares in other carmakers on fear the
fallout could affect the wider industry. Daimler (DDAIF), the maker of Mercedes-Benz, fell 7%,
while BMW (BAMXY) lost 6%" (Thompson & Kottasova, 2015). Even if they had nothing to do
from VW's mistake. They should take solace in the fact, however, that they are not suffering as
badly as VW itself. Although BMW and Daimler did indeed suffer some fallout, over the period
between July and October of last year, VW's preferred stock only had a positive net gain of
Since the entire auto industry has been pulled into media attention due to this scandal,
they have their own opinions on how Volkswagen should make amends. Although VW's plan to
set aside money in order to recall their vehicles and fix them is a good start, the other companies
believe it would be better to "pour those resources into speedier development of zero
emissions vehicles" (Bjornstad, 2016). It would be more costly on VW's end to do this, but in
the big game, this is better for restoring the company's reputation than their previous plan. In
addition, these companies also believe VW should invest in making sure actual zero-emission
vehicles hit the market within five year, so "it forces VW to do more than they have had to do,
and the air quality benefits all the more" (Bjornstad, 2016). Although the vehicles released
before the discovery of this scandal have already done some damage, VW should focus on
making sure their cars cause no more than they already have. Both these suggestions could surely
McDermott 10
restore VW's reputation, but it is up to the company's executives whether or not they will follow
As far as the company's reputation is concerned, Jake Fisher from Consumer Reports has
said that "no one wants to buy a car from a company that's going to lie to you" and that it brings
doubt into the performance of an actual low-emission car VW could produce: "We have doubts
on whether or not they're going to continue to get the good fuel economy that they get. We have
doubts whether or not they're going to drive as nicely. Will they be slower? Will there be other
problems? Obviously, they made the decision for a reason" (Glinton, 2015). Although this
scandal has damaged their reputation, the company has at least put some effort into fixing their
mistake. "Consumers are willing to forgive in time. It's just, how long will the financial impact
last?...while the rest of the industry enjoys record sales and is innovating and hunkering down for
the next recession, Volkswagen is likely to be trying to fix its self-inflicted wound" (Glinton,
2016). There is no telling how long Volkswagen will bear the stigma of an auto dealer that lied
about being low-emission, but as management should change over time, their efforts, as well as
Thanks to my research into the Volkswagen scandal, I now have a better understanding
of how this scandal was discovered and the ramifications of the company's actions. Overall, my
opinion has stayed the same: the company's actions were unethical and they should be punished
to the furthest extent of the law for potential damage to the environment. As stated earlier, this
scandal has brought to light a lack of integrity in European automotive companies' emissions
test, and calls for renewed testing protocol to make sure similar "cheat devices" are discovered
before being released to the public. In addition, we as consumers should be aware that the trust
McDermott 11
between us and the manufacturers is something they value. If they commit actions that could
cause a loss in trust, it our responsibility to remind them we do not appreciate being lied to.
McDermott 12
References
Bowler, T. (2015). Volkswagen: From the Third Reich to emissions scandal. BBC News.
Retrieved
from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34358783
Cahill, K. "Ethical Frameworks." Date unknown, .pdf file
Editorial Board, The (2016). Beyond the Emissions Test at VW. The New York Times. Retrieved
from
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/opinion/beyond-the-emissions-test-at-vw.html?_r=0
Geiger, F. (2015). Volkswagen's World-Wide Sales Fall on Decline in U.S., South America. The
Wall
Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/volkswagen-sales-fall-
showing-commercial-strain-of-emissions-scandal-1449845910
Glinton, S. (2016.) In 2016, Volkswagen Aims To Repair Its Reputation After Emissions
Scandal.
NPR: KQED Public Radio. Retrieved from
http://www.npr.org/2015/12/31/461568450/in-2016-volkswagen-aims-to-repair-its-
reputation-after-emissions-scandal
Hotten, R. (2015). Volkswagen: The Scandal Explained. BBC News. Retrieved from
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772
Joshi, P. & Hakim, D. (2016). VW's Public Relations Responses and Flubs. The New York
Times.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/26/business/volkswagen-
public-relations-flubs.html
Mullen, J. (2016). Fuel economy scandal drives Mitsubishi Motors to first loss in 8 years. CNN
Roose, K. (2015). The Volkswagen 'Dieselgate' scandal is a new low in corporate malfeasance.
McDermott 13
from http://www.hybridcars.com/what-led-volkswagen-to-use-emission-cheats/
Swaminatha, V. & Mah, S. (2016). What 100,000 Tweets About the Volkswagen Scandal Tell
Us
About Angry Customers. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2016/09/what-100000-tweets-about-the-volkswagen-scandal-tell-us-about-
angry-customers
Thompson, N. & Kottasova, I. (2015). Volkswagen scandal widens. CNN Money. Retrieved
from http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/22/news/vw-recall-diesel/