Sie sind auf Seite 1von 51

MECHANICS OF MATERIAL

INTRODUCTION

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 1
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 2
Introduction
Types of Materials Failures in Mechanical and
Structural Design
Limit of Strength and Ductility in Engineering
Materials
Development of New Technology, New Materials and
New Methods of Assessment
Fracture Economy
Design and Materials Selection

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 3
Engineering Design

Performance Economy
Function Cost
Safety
Durability

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 4
stretch twist

compress bend

Deformation

(MECHANICAL) LOAD Material RESPONSE Mechanical Behavior

Load-bearing Material Fracture

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 5
Mechanical Testing Quantitative Data
Design Code, Standard,
Material Selection, Use , and Evaluation

The Basic Concerns


to assure that stress does not exceed the limit a material can withstand
(the Strength of Materials)
to avoid failure due to undue deformation or fracture

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 6
Deformation Failures: A change in the physical dimension or shape of a
component that is sufficient for its function to be lost or impaired.

Fracture Failures: Cracking to the extent that a component is separated


into two or more pieces.

Corrosion: Loss of materials due to chemical action.

Wear: A surface removal due to abrasion or sticking between solid


surfaces that touch.

Erosion: Wear that is caused by a fluid (especially likely if the fluid


contains hard particles).

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 7
Type of Failures

Deformation Fracture

Time-Independent Time-Dependent Static Loading Cyclic Loading

Elastic Brittle High Cycle


Creep
Plastic Ductile Low Cycle
Environment Crack Growth
Rupture Corrosion

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 8
L A
P L

A L
L

E
P 0

e p e
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 9
Normal Shear
x V
L L
P' P b

L x
tan
L b

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 10

Elastic Limit

Proportional Limit

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 11
Elastic Deformation

Proportional Limit


E Coefficient of Proportionality

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 12
E
E = Young Modulus, Elastic Modulus
a measure of stiffness/rigidity of the material

metal
G
twist

polymer

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 13
Plastic Deformation

Ductile Fracture Brittle Fracture

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 14
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 15
Small Elastic and Plastic Deformation as well as
Large Plastic Deformation
can lead to Failure

Large Plastic Deformation always constitute failure.


Small Plastic Deformation may also cause failure.
(e.g. a bent shaft will result in unbalanced rotation vibration or
even early failure of bearing supports)
Small Elastic Deformation may also result in failure (when
deformation is tightly limited).

Buckling is elastic or plastic deformation or combination of


them due to compressive stress, resulting in large changes in
its alignment.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 16
Ideally, a Structural Material should be:
Strong + Ductile = TOUGH

u d

Resilience (Tensile)
Toughness


The area below the curve represents the amount of energy that can be absorbed

Strength: the highest stress reached before fracture


Ductility: the strain at fracture

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 17
Time-Dependent Creep Deformation

A tungsten filament sagging under its own weight.


Deflection is time-dependent that can lead to failure

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 18
Fracture under Static and Impact Loading

Brittle (Fast) Fracture may occur when materials is subjected to


static loading (loading that does not vary or change slowly with
time)

Ductile Fracture is more preferable than Brittle Fracture


Slow Fracture is accompanied by a significant amount of plastic
deformation sometimes with a gradual tearing process.

Impact (very rapidly) loading tend to cause Brittle Fracture.

Ductile materials may be fractured in brittle manner


due to crack/sharp flaw.

The study of crack in solids is Fracture Mechanics

Resistance to Brittle Fracture in the presence of a crack/sharp flaw


is measured by Fracture Toughness (KIC)

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 20
Fracture Toughness Test
Fracture Toughness

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 21
Fracture Toughness vs. Yield Strength

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 22
Stress in Collaboration with Environment may cause Fracture
= Environmental Cracking.
Examples:
Low Strength Steel in NaOH (High pH)
High Strength Steel in H2 or H2S

SCC (Stress Corrosion Cracking) is a specific case when


materials are removed by corrosive action in the presence of
stress.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 23
A stainless steel wire is broken when it is being exposed in a complex
organic environment including molten nylon.
Cracking is inter-granular.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 24
Cyclic (Repeated) Loading may cause failure = Fatigue Fracture.
(High Cycle or Low Cycle Fatigue)

Heat Cycle may also cause fatigue = Thermal Fatigue.

Crack may be initiated during manufacture and service.


Crack growth may result in an Overload Fracture (Ductile/Brittle)

Example:
Rivet holes in a fuselage may crack.
The crack gradually grows during service.

Preventive Action may be done by Inspection and Repair.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 25
Development of a fatigue crack during rotating bending of
a precipitation hardened aluminum alloy.
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 26
Fatigue Failure of a Door Garage Spring

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 27
Combined (>2 types synergistic) effects
may also produce failure

Examples:

Creep + Fatigue Enhanced Effect at High Temperature and


Cyclic Loading. (Steam Turbine in Power Plant and Gas
Turbine in Aircraft Engine).

Wear (due to the small motions between two fitted parts) +


Fatigue (cyclic loading) may collaboratively produce surface
damage followed by cracking Fretting Fatigue (a Gear
fastened on a shaft by shrink fitting or press fitting)

Fatigue + Corrosion Corrosion Fatigue

Environment may degrade the mechanical properties of


materials. Eg. Embrittlement of Polymer (UV Exposure) or
Steel (Neutron Radiation)
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 28
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 29
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 30
NEW PROCESSING AND
MANUFACTURING
METHOD

NEW DESIGN &


TECHNOLOGY NEW MATERIALS

NEW
CHARACTERIZATION
AND EVALUATION
METHOD

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 31
The Economy of Fracture

Crack and Related Problem cost 4% of GNP ($119 Billion)


in the US Economy (Also a typical in European Economy)
(along with Wear and Corrosion it is 10% of GNP)

Fracture Study Extra Design Cost

Product Liability Cost:


1. Repair, Maintenance, Replacement
2. Inspection
3. Recalls, Litigation, Insurance

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 32
Cost of Failure
(% of Total Cost)
Motor vehicle and parts 10
Aircraft and parts 6
Residential construction10% 5
Building construction 2-3
Food and related products 2-3
Fabricated structural products 2-3
Non ferrous metal products 2-3
Petroleum refining 2-3
5%
Structural metal 2-3
Tires and inner6%
tubes 2-3

The major case for motor vehicle and aircraft is Fatigue Cracking
followed by Brittle, Ductile, Environmental, and Creep.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 33
Deformation and fracture are issues of major economic
importance especially in motor vehicles and aircraft.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 34
Design and Materials Selection
Design:
Process of choosing the geometry, materials, and manufacturing
methods and other details need to completely describe a machine,
vehicle, structure, or other engineered items.

Wide ranges of activities and objectives


To assure that the items is capable of performing its intended
function (technical, industrial).
Also, to assure that they are physically possible and economical
to be manufactured, safe, and durable.

Technological Challenge:
1. Improved material
2. More careful design analysis
3. More detailed and accurate information on materials behavior

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 35
Material

Function

Geometry Manufacture

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 36
Iterative and Stepwise of Design

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 38
Safety Factor

To provide a degree of assurance that unexpected events in


service do not cause failure.

Dependent upon failure consequence as well as the


uncertainties of information, assumption and approximation.

X1=1.5-3.0
stress causing failure
X1 higher when uncertainties
stress in service
and consequences are higher

Safety Factor in Stress

= Allowable Stress Design

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 39
for parts subjected to deformation or cracking that gradually progress with time:

failure life
X2 X2=5-20
desired life service
higher when life is more
sensitive to small change

Safety Factor in Life

(load in service) Y load causing failure

In some cases: X1 Y
But Y in advantage can be expanded for difference sources
= Load Factor Design

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 40
Durability

The capacity of an item to survive its intended use for a


suitably long period of time

Good durability minimize cost for maintaining and replacing


items as well as increase safety and sustainability.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 41
Prototype and Component Testing

Testing should be done:


1. At the very early stage: to provide quantitative data for design
2. At the later stage: to verify the design safety and durability
(to deal with assumptions and imperfect knowledge reflected in
many engineering estimates of strength or life)

Model Prototype is employed for


simulated service and durability testing

Critical Component Testing vs. Full Prototype Testing


Full prototype testing is expensive but may not be replaced

Simulation vs. Physical Testing


Results of simulation is as good as assumptions, data, used in the
analysis.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 42
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 43
Strong

E 0
Stiff/Rigid Strong

A measure of the stiffness of A measure of the strength of


the materials under axial materials under axial loading
loading. to withstand plastic
deformation.
In torsional loading (Shear
Stress) is called G In Brittle materials is often
(Modulus of Rigidity) replaced by UTS.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 45
Selection Procedure (Case 1)

Plastic Deformation is not Allowed, Deflection is not Limited

Critical Properties: c 0 or u X = 2-3

Objective: Minimize Mass

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 46
A Systematic Procedure

1. Requirements: L, P, X

2. Geometry Variable: r

3. Material Properties: c &


4. Quantity to Minimize: m

Q f1 L, P, X f 2 , c

Constant for a Given Design Vary with Materials

Once Q is obtained it may be applied to each candidate material

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 47
m r L 2

r 4
M max c1 Iz
4
Iz
M max PL

PLr 4 PL

r 4
4
r 3
4 PLX
r


1
3


c c

X
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 48
2
4 PLX 3

m L

c

4 PX 5 2

m f1 f 2
3

L3 2
c 3
Structural Index
MATERIAL INDEX

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 49
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 50
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 51
PROBLEM SET 1 (NED Prob.3.15)

Consider the beam of circular cross section of the figure below.


As before, the radius r of the cross section may vary with material and
the beam is required to have length L and carry load P. However, in this
case the strength requirement is replaced by a requirement that that the
deflection not exceed a particular value vmax.
(a) Select a material from the Table such that the mass is minimized.
(b) Repeat the selection with cost being minimized
(c) Briefly discuss your results, and suggest one or more materials that
response a reasonable choice where both light weight and cost are
important.

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 55
Deflection is Limited

Critical Properties: E
Objective: Minimize Mass

Q f1 L , P , X f 2 , E

rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 56
rahmat.saptono@ui.ac.id 59

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen