Two conventional methods, the nominal stress method and the hot spot stress method,

are examined for the fatigue assessment of a steel box girder bridge while
considering the effect of the modeling options on the estimated fatigue life. Two
analytical models, a simplified global analytical model and a refined local finite
element analytical model, are developed for the evaluation of the stress ranges
induced by a fatigue truck. The field tests are conducted for validating the
analytical models as well as for direct fatigue assessment via an ambient vibration
test. The local modeling options that are examined are the inclusion of the fillet
weld itself in the refined analytical model and the mitigation of the concentrated
stress at the web plate, considering stress dispersion over the width of the
attachment. The fatigue life is estimated for three different nonexceedance
probabilities, considering different partial factors according to the accuracy of
the analysis method as well as the reliability of the estimated fatigue loading for
a specific bridge site. Through a comparative analysis, the potential differences
in estimated fatigue lives according to the assessment methods and the modeling
options are quantitatively discussed.