Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Christy Jacobs
Ben Hill Primary, K-2
School Improvement Team
Summer 2017
Purpose
In order to best determine areas of growth and areas of focus, we must always
go back to data. The purpose of of the data overview is to best determine areas
of growth and areas of weakness in order to make Ben Hill Primary School most
effective for teaching all students.
Data is not about adding more to your plate. Data is about making sure you
have the right things on your plate. -
Student Demographics
2013 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 2014 STUDENT ENROLLMENT
PERCENTAGES PERCENTAGES
Asian Black Hispanic Multiracial White Asian Black Hispanic Multiracial White
Asian Asian
1% 1%
White
38% White
Black
Black 41%
43%
45%
Multiracial
Multiracial Hispanic
3% Hispanic
13% 3% 12%
19.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016
18.80%
Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade
17.20%
16.80%
450 396
13.70%
13.70%
12.50%
12.50%
400
12.30%
12.30%
11.90%
11.90%
PERCENTAGES BY YEAR
336
Number of Students
10.00%
285 292 299 279
299
9.00%
300 247 253 259
8.40%
8.00%
8.00%
7.80%
7.40%
250
6.50%
200
3.20%
150
2.50%
1.90%
1.70%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
100
50
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 MIGRANT SWD LEP EIP SPED ESOL GIFTED
Year SUBGROUP PROGRAMS
2013 DISTRICT NUMBER OF 2014 DISTRICT NUMBER OF
STUDENTS BY GRADE (TOTAL STUDENTS BY GRADE (TOTAL
POPULATION: 3,116 POPULATION: 3,105)
Grade Level
153 8 260
10 193
Grade Level
242 236
8 260 6 230
246 237
6 225 4 231
230 229
4 246 2 253
231
2 247 316
285 K 336
K 396
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Number of Students Number of Students
Grade Level
265 251
8 229 8 217
223 231
6 231 6 221
225 223
4 232 4 246
240 281
2 299 2 259
292 299
K 312 K 279
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Number of Students Number of Students
Student Demographics
2013 STUDENT POPULATION 2014 STUDENT POPULATION
BY GENDER BY GENDER
Total 245 Total 302
Females 126 Females 144
Gender and Total per Grade
50
0
2013 2014 2015 2016
YEAR
Teacher Demographics
NUMBER OF TEACHERS
40
30
Second Grade 1 11
Grade
20
First Grade 2 12
10
Kindergarten 1 13 4 4 4 3
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2013 2014 2015 2016
Number of Teachers YEAR
Teacher Demographics
DEGREE LEVELS OF TEACHING STAFF
2016 2015 2014 2013
2
3
7 Year (Doctorate)
3
3
17
21
Level of Degree
6 Year (Specialists)
21
20
25
24
5 Year (Masters)
23
24
15
12
4 Year (Bachelors)
13
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of Teachers
Student Achievement
CCRPI INDEX
State District School
100 94.1
91.3
88.3 86.3
90
77.8 76
80 73.7 72.7 74.6
69.5 71.7
67.1
70
Percentage Score
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2013 2014 2015 2016
Year
KINDERGARTEN EARLY FIRST GRADE READING STAR
LITERARCY STAR AVERAGES AVERAGES (N=270)
Percentile Ranges
75.00% 0.5
0.8 0.4
Percentile Ranges
SY 13-14
0 Grade Equlivant Percentile Rank Instructional
Age Grade Placement Reading Level
Reporting Factors Reporting Factors
0.8 48.00%
0.6 37.00%
Grade First Grade 0.49
0.4
0.2 2.40%2.50% 2.10%2.30%
0
Kindergarten 0.59
Grade Equlivant Percentile Rank Instructional Estimated Oral
Reading Level Reading Fluency 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Reporting Factors Percentile Range
KINDERGARTEN EARLY
LITERARCY STAR AVERAGES FIRST GRADE READING STAR
Percentile Range
0.6
19.00%
2.00% 0.80% 0.4
2.00%
1.30% 1.20%
0.00% 0.2
SY 14-15
0.00% 0
Age Grade Placement Grade Percentile Instructional Estimated
Equlivant Rank Reading Level Oral Reading
Reporting Factors
Fluency
Reporting Factors
1
88.00% GROWTH PERCENTILE
Percentile Range
Percentile Range
0.1 5.70%6.40% 50.00% 36.00%
Percentile Range
0.05 40.00%
0.02%0.79%
30.00% 19.00%
0
20.00%
Age Grade Placement 2.10%
1.30% 1.40%
10.00%
SY 15-16
Reporting Factors
0.00%
Grade Percentile Instructional Estimated
Equlivant Rank Reading Oral Reading
Level Fluency
Reporting Factors
SECOND GRADE READING STAR
AVERAGES (N= 248 STUDENTS)
Pretest Posttest STAR READING/ EARLY
1
0.9
91.00%
FLUENCY
0.8
MEDIAN STUDENT GROWTH
Percentile Range
0.7
0.6
0.5
54.00% 51.00% PERCENTILE
0.4 34.00%
0.3 Second Grade 0.52
Grade
73.20%
62.50%
65.00%
57.70%
61.90%
72.70%
Kindergarten Fall
37.60%
71.20%
63.90%
72.50%
70.80%
STUDENTS)
70.50%
72.60%
REPORTING FACTORS
94.50%
Kindergarten Spring
4.30%
18.50%
40.60%
10.70%
KINDERGARTEN GRASP (N=269
87.00%
51.80%
50.00%
71.60%
50.60%
54.90%
38.50%
First Grade Fall
68.30%
65.20%
20.20%
REPORTING FACTORS
83.40%
SY 16-17
(N=237 STUDENTS)
First Grade Spring
FIRST GRADE GRASP
54.60%
62.80%
76.90%
95.50%
47.20%
GRASP- Universal Screener
59.90%
51.30%
Second Grade Fall
68.80%
48.00%
89.60%
REPORTING FACTORS
(N=270 STUDENTS)
59.80%
SECOND GRADE GRASP
78.70%
Academic Strengths
u With a focus on Reading and Fluency over the past four years, Ben Hill
Primary has the following Academic Strengths:
u Recognition of Rhyming Words
u Phonemic Awareness
u High Frequency Words- Sight Words
u Letter Recognition
u Letter Sounds
Academic Improvements
u In order to increase the achievement percentages of students performing in
Reading/Language Arts, improvements are needed to the following academic
areas:
u Reading Fluency
u Reading Maze Comprehension
Current State of Achievement
u 50% of students k-2 are performing below reading level as measured by the
STAR, GRASP, and Lexile reports from the past four years. In order to improve
the overall reading fluency and comprehension of the school, Ben Hill Primary
will attempt to meet the reading fluency and comprehension needs of all
students through:
u Resource: will work in small groups with students with disabilities who show
deficiencies in reading. The root causes of the issues seem to be student ability,
parental involvement, and time.
u Small group instruction
u Intervention
u Afterschool
u Volunteers
Questions and Discussions
u In order to better compare the data from the different measurement tools
used over the span of the past four years, a breakdown of the STAR would
need to take place to obtain the overall percentages of the descriptive
measures taken on the GRASP. While the Instructional Reading Level and the
Estimated Oral Reading Fluency provide insight as to the impact on classroom
instruction, further knowledge is required regarding student growth on more
descriptive measures.
u Are additional measures or tools available to assist with a school-wide focus
on increasing reading fluency and comprehension?
u Can the school schedule be adjusted to allow all classrooms a period of
reading instruction first thing in the morning?
u Are classes scheduled access at least three times a week to the library to
check out books and encourage reading at home?