Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 2 (1988) 359 364 359

Elsevier

S1M00101

Production of butyric acid by batch fermentation of cheese whey


with Clostridium beijerinckii
Shahriar Alam*, David Stevens** and Rakesh Bajpai
Department of Chemical Engineering, b~Tiversityof Missouri- Columbia, Columbia, MO, U.S.A.
Received 22 April 1987
Revised 5 October 1987
Accepted 8 October 1987

Key words." pH strategy; Butyric acid; Cheese whey; Acetone/butanol

SUMMARY

The effect of pH on the fermentation of butyric acid by Clostridium beijerinckii using cheese whey as a
substrate was studied. Maximum concentrations of the acid were produced when the pH was controlled at
5.5. Raising or lowering of pH was found to reduce the total acid formation. This particular strain of C.
beijerinckii produced insignificant amounts of butanol in all the pure culture cases investigated. A compar-
ative study of the fermentation in a synthetic glucose medium and in cheese whey showed the whey to produce
more butyric acid.

INTRODUCTION reasonable alternatives to traditional disposal pro-


cedures [4,26]. The acetone/butanol fermentation
Cheese whey constitutes a major waste disposal has been shown to be economically attractive [15].
problem for the dairy industry throughout the Considering the toxicity of the products of this fer-
world [20], except for places where the industry is mentation [3], cheese whey with its 5-6% lactose
decentralized and local utilization is possible. Part concentration represents the maximum carbohy-
of the whey is presently utilized as a human food drate levels that can be utilized in this system.
source and also for feeding animals. Considerable Butyric acid production by Clostridium species
amounts are processed into lactose and protein in has a significant bearing on acetone/butanol fer-
the U.S.A. Among emerging technologies, alcohol mentation, as the onset of butanol production has
and single-cell-protein production seem to be been associated with the concentration of acids
present in the system [2,10]. An understanding of
physiological factors that govern the acid forma-
* Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, illinois tion is, therefore, important for future industrial
Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
applications. The production of organic acids such
** Present address: Black and Veatch, Kansas City, MO, U.S.A.
Correspondence: R. Bajpai, Department of Chemical Engineer- as butyric, propionic [5] and acetic acids represents
ing, University of Missouri - - Columbia, Columbia, MO 6521 I, another possibility for whey utilization. Though
U.S.A. there have been few organized attempts to maxi-

0169-4146/88/$03.50 9 1988 Society for Industrial Microbiology


360

mize fermentative production of butyric acid [24], fermenter (working volume 6-6.5 liters) was used
the economics of butyric acid is attractive for com- in this study. The broth was agitated at 100 rpm to
mercial production with genetically engineered bac- maintain uniformity and temperature was held con-
teria [8]. It may also be possible to esterify the or- stant at 37~ pH was automatically controlled by
ganic acids with alcohols to produce carboxylic acid addition of 5 N NaOH or 1 N H2SO 4 when desired.
esters that have better properties as fuels than al- A 5% (v/v) actively growing culture was used as
cohols alone [7]. inoculum. The broth was kept anaerobic by flowing
This study involves the production of butyric sterile nitrogen through it before and after inocu-
acid from cheese whey using C. bei/erinckii (for- lation. The flow of nitrogen was stopped once the
merly known as C. butylicum). Specifically, the ob- microorganisms were observed to be growing.
jectives were to investigate the influence of pH on Product analysis. Concentrations of acids (bu-
the metabolism of an industrial strain and identify tyric and acetic) and solvents (acetone, butanol,
conditions for the maximum production of butyric ethanol) in sampled broth were measured by a Var-
acid utilizing cheese whey. ian 1520 gas chromatograph using a flame ioniza-
Published literature dealing with butyric acid tion detector. The gas chromatograph was
fermentation is relatively scarce [24]. A number of equipped with a 183 cm column of teflon-coated
strains of C. be:/erinckii have been investigated in steel (internal diameter 2 mm), packed with 80/t00
recent years for the production of butanol and iso- mesh Chromosorb WAW AT 1000 packing mate-
propanol [12,14]. The reported levels of acid pro- rial (Alltech). The oven temperature was pro-
duction in these studies were always very low. Fer- grammed from 90~ to 160~ at a rate of 10~
mentation of cheese whey by C. acetobutylicum has Detector temperature was maintained at 230~
also been studied, but for solvent production only Lactose concentration in the samples was mea-
[17,18]. It has been shown that considerable sured by the Nelson-Somagi method [23].
amounts of butyric acid could be produced by C.
acetobutylicum under suitable pH conditions using
glucose as substrate [21]. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Batch fermentations were conducted to investi-


MATERIALS AND METHODS gate the cellular control of butyric acid fermenta-
tion by this strain of C. beijerinckii. The specific
Microorganisms. Spores of a strain of C. beije> objective was to determine the physiological con-
inckii were supplied by the Bio-diesel Corporation ditions under which the microorganism produces
of Iowa, U.S.A. These were stored at 4~ in rein- maximum concentrations of butyric acid from
forced clostridial medium (Oxoid) with 1% calcium cheese whey.
carbonate added to it. The spores were germinated Uncontrolled pH experiments with unsupple-
by heat-shocking for 1 min at 100~ mented cheese whey (initial pH 6.2) in Hungate
Cheese whey. Acid cheese whey was obtained tubes resulted in butyric acid, acetic acid and bu-
from Mid America Dairy, Kirksville, MO, U.S.A. tanol concentrations of 6.5, 2.3 and 0.8 g/l, respec-
It contained between 50 and 65 g/1 lactose and had tively, after 7 days. Uncontrolled experiments in a
a pH between 4.11 and 4.25. Raw whey was stored fermenter noted a pH drop from 6.5 to 4.5 in 200
frozen in 1 gallon plastic containers. h with similar product concentrations (butyric acid
Media. Unsupplemented heat-sterilized cheese 6.5 g/1 and acetic acid 2.0 g/l). No butanol was ob-
whey was used as fermentation medium. Leung's served in the fermenter.
[16] synthetic medium for C. acetobutylicum was The concentration of hydrogen ions in culture
also used in some experiments. broth is an important variable that influences the
Batch fermentation. A 14 liter New Brunswick relative rates of growth and product formation in
36l

microbial systems. Growth of bacteria has been re- 8 14 I 7O

ported to be optimal under neutral to slightly acidic


conditions. Growth of cells is strongly impaired at TI 12 / <
low pH. On the other hand, induction of solven-
togenesis in solvent-producing microorganisms has 6 [0
/
/
/
9
t~176
--50
I
been correlated with the concentration of undisso- I
J
ciated butyric acid in the system, which increases 5 8 d4o
under acidic conditions [22]. Hence, profiling of pH !

is an important tool in controlling the patterns of \


4LF 6 i 30 9
product formation. Therefore, a number of experi-
ments were conducted with different pH profiles in E
0D E
the fermenter. Figs. 1 to 4 show results of these 20 9'4
experiments. In Fig. 1, the pH of the fermentation D
I
medium was controlled at 5.5 throughout the ex- ! `0
periment. The experiment in Fig. 2 was initiated at
a pH of 6.3 which was allowed to fall naturally to
5.5 and was then controlled at 5.5 + 0.15 for the
Q

0 50 I00 I~0 200 250


io
rest of the experiment. Fig. 3 shows the case where TIME, HF~
the initial pH was maintained at 6.0 + 0.1 for 44 Fig. 2. The time course of substrate utilization and product for-
h, then forced to fall to 5.5, and once again to 5.0 mation by C. beijeHnckii. Initial pH 6.3 and controlled at 5.5
4- 0.15 after 30 b. The symbols are the same as in Fig. 1.
after 6 h. From this time on, the pH was left un-
controlled; it eventually dropped to 4.5 in 150 h.
Fig. 4 represents the case where the initial pH was
6.3 and was allowed to fall to 5.0, where it was con-

8[- 14 r 70 e ~ ~4 1 To
, I I

7[J 2
i ii
2 60 vl 12 ~eo
J
i
6 IO 50

i I [0 ' ~ ~ 50

5 (98 4O
i _]

4 :_(g
j_8_ so 9 4 j 30@

I Io / i rr
< B ~ E
Es
x0*~0_a: 20@
D
i
2 2 ]Jo 9 i IO

O O _
9
_
50 [00 i50 200
~ 0
250
oL o , 7 0 50 I00 2NO 200 250
o
TIME, I-{R TIME, HR
Fig. I. The time course of substrate utilization and product for- Fig. 3. The time course of substrate utilization and product for-
mation by C. be~jerinckii at a controlled pH of 5.5. Butyric acid mation by C. beijerinckii, pH dropped in stages from 6 to 5.5
(A); acetic acid (O); butanol (A); lactose ([2]); pH (O). and then to 5.0. The symbols are the same as in Fig. 1.
362

8 14 r 70 trolled for the rest of the experiment. For the pur-


pose of comparison, an experiment was also per-
60 formed with a glucose synthetic medium. Here, the
pH was held constant at 5.5 and the initial sugar
BO concentration was 115 g/1. Results of this exper-
6 I O ~ D
iment are shown in Fig. 5.
Cheese whey fermentations were accompanied
140
ai@ by the formation of precipitates; as a result, bio-
mass concentrations could not be monitored. In all
30 0 of the experiments, butyric acid was the major
E product formed, characterizing a 'butyric fermen-
4-'7 q2o 0 tation' [19]. Although this microorganism is capa-
: ble of producing butanol [30], no significant
(8
amounts were formed under these conditions. In all

A
1~ cases, the concentrations of acetic acid and butanol
remained between 1 and 4 g/l and no correlation
O !o
0 BO I00 150 200 250
was observed with the pH of the system. Acetone
TIME ~ HR did not show up in any of these experiments. Such
Fig. 4. The time course of substrate utilization and product for- behavior has been reported in the past both with C.
mation by C. beijerinckii. Initial pH 6.3 and controlled above beijerinckii [9,31] and with C. acetobutylicum [31].
5.0. The symbols are the same as in Fig. 1. Since the objective of this work was to promote
butyric acid production, the reasons for the low
levels of solvents produced were not explored.
Nonetheless, several recent publications throw light
140
upon this aspect in the form of activities of relevant
14
Y enzyme systems and the redox potential of the sys-

12L\ 120 3.0


tem. It has been documented [1,6,11] that enzymes

il
involved in the synthesis of acids, namely phospho-
transacetylase, acetate kinase, phosphotransbutyr-
/~o k IO0_j 2.5 ylase and butyrate kinase, have their highest activ-
@ ity in the acid production phase. On the other hand,
5 80 2.0 the terminal enzymes catalyzing solvent production
(butyraldebyde dehydrogenase and butanol dehy-
0 drogenase) have 70-90-fold higher activity in sol-
4 D 60 O0 i.s U)
<
I D Z vent-producing cells than in the acid-producing
12 0 stage [27,28]. The levels of reduced nucleotides such
O2
n 40 @ ~.o []
as NADH and NADPH have also been shown to
I
play an important role in controlling solvent pro-
' 20 0.~ duction [13] and have been used to control the

i/ 0 2B
TIME
BO
, HFR
75 EO0
io
metabolic flow [25,29]. Since the current strain of
C. be(jerinckii has been shown [30] to be capable of
producing butanol in the presence of Bacillus cer~
eus, which is not a solvent producer, it is suspected
Fig. 5. Profiles of substrate, biomass and products in a con-
that acids were primarily produced here not be-
trolled-pH butyric acid fermentation utilizing C. beijerinckii on
a glucose synthetic medium. Biomass (11); butyric acid (at); cause of a lack of required enzymes to produce sol-
acetic acid (0); glucose (D); pH (O). vents but because of the modulating influence of
363

the redox potential in this system. REFERENCES


The concentration o f butyric acid was greater
than 12 g/1 in Figs. 1 and 2. However, the produc- 1 Andersch, W., H. Bahl and G. Gottschalk. 1983. Levels of
tion rate was faster at a constant p H o f 5.5, imply- enzymes involved in acetate, butyrate, acetone, and butanol
formation by Clostridium aeetobutylicum. Eur. J. Appl. Mi-
ing a negative influence o f higher initial pH. This crobioI. Biotechnol. 18: 327-332.
was verified by additional experiments (data not 2 Bahl, H., W. Anders, K. Braun and G. Gottschalk. 1982.
shown) where the p H was controlled above 6.0 and Effect of pH and butyrate concentrations on the production
p o o r p r o d u c t formation was observed. Lower p H of acetone and butanol by Clostridium aeetobutylicum grown
values were also f o u n d to be unfavorable for bu- in continuous culture. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
14:17-20.
tyric acid p r o d u c t i o n (Figs. 3 and 4). F o r this strain, 3 Bajpai, R.K. and E. L. lannotti. 1987. Product inhiNtion.
a p H o f 5.5 appears to be optimal for growth as In: Handbook of Anaerobic Fermentations (Erickson, L.E.
well as for butyric acid production. and D.Y.C. Fung, eds.), Chapter 8, Marcel Dekker, New
A c o m p a r i s o n o f p r o d u c t formation profiles on York.
whey (Fig. 1) with those on glucose synthetic me- 4 Bernstein, S., C.H. Tzeng and D. Sisson. 1979. The com-
mercial fermentation of cheese whey for the production of
dium (Fig. 5) shows that even t h o u g h the growth protein and/or alcohol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Syrup. 7: 1-9.
rate on glucose is considerably higher than that on 5 Bodie, E.A., N. Goodman and R.D. Schwartz. 1987. Pro-
whey, the concentration o f total acids is higher in duction of propionic acid by mixed cultures of Propionibac-
whey. The reason for this discrepancy remains un- terium shermanii and Lactobacillus casei in autoclave steril-
ized whey. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1: 349-353.
clear, although it m a y be related to differences in
6 Duerree, P., A. Kuhn, M. Gottwald and G. Gottschalk.
toxicity o f the organic acids to the transport sys- 1987. Enzymatic investigations of butanol dehydrogenase
tems of the two sugars [32], The total a m o u n t o f and butyraldebyde dehydrogenase in extracts of Clostridiurn
carbohydrates utilized is approximately the same in acetobutylicurn. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 268-272.
both cases (roughly 6%), suggesting that the ad- 7 Dutta, R. 1980. Production of organic acid esters from bio-
mass - novel process and concept. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
verse effects o f the acids on metabolism is the pri-
Symp. 11: 521-532.
m a r y limitation o f this fermentation system. This 8 Flanery, R.J. and A. Steinschneider. 1983. Fermentation
view is supported by a n u m b e r o f observations re- economics in relation to genetic engineering. Biotechnology
ported in the literature [3]. 1: 773.
In conclusion, C. beijerinckii produced the high- 9 George, H.A. and J.S. Chen. 1983. Acidic conditions are not
obligatory for onset of butanol formation by Clostridium
est level o f butyric acid when the p H was main-
beijerinckii (synonym. C. butylicum). Appl. Environ. Micro-
tained at a constant value o f 5.5. A n initial p H o f biol. 46: 321-327.
greater than 6.0 caused a sluggishness in p r o d u c t 10 Gottschalk, G. and J.G. Morris. 1981. The indication of
formation and production was further impaired acetone and butanol production in cultures of CIostridium
when the p H fell below 5.0. This particular strain acetobutylicum by elevated concentrations of acetate and
produced very little butanol when present in pure butyrate. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 12: 385-389.
1i Hartmanis, M.G.N. and S. Gatenbeck. 1984. Intermediary
culture, which is contrary to the findings with metabolism in Clostridium acetobutylicum: levels of enzymes
others o f the same type [9]. In mixed culture with involved in the formation of acetate and butyrate. Appl.
a strain o f B. cereus, it p r o d u c e d substantial Environ. Microbiol. 47: 127~1283.
a m o u n t s o f butanol as well as butyric acid [30]. 12 Jobses, I.M.L. asnd J. A. Rods. I983. Experience with sol-
vent production by CIostridium beijerinckii in continuous
culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25: 1187-1194.
13 Kim, J., R.K. Bajpai and E.L. Iannotti. 1987. Redox poten-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT tial in acetone-butanoI fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
Symp., in press.
This project was supported by a grant from the 14 Krouwel, P.G., W.J. Groot and N.W.F.Kossen. 1983. Con-
Bio-diesel C o r p o r a t i o n o f Iowa, U.S.A. tinuous IBE fermentation by immobilized growing Clostri-
364

dium beijerinckii cells in a stirred tank fermenter. Biotechnol. 23 Nelson, N. 1944. A photometric adaption of the Somagi
Bioeng. 25: 281-299. method for determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 153:
15 Lenz, T. G. and A.R. Moreira. 1980. Economic evaluation 375-380.
of acetone butanol fermentation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. 24 Playne, M.J. 1983. Propionic and butyric acids. In: Compre-
Res. Dev. 19: 478-483. hensive Biotechnology, Vol. 3 (Moo-Young, M., ed.), pp.
16 Leung, J.C.Y. 1982. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the De- 731-754, Pergamon Press, New York.
partment of Nutrition and Food Science, MIT, Cambridge, 25 Rao, G. and R. Mutharasan. 1987. Altered electron flow in
MA, U.S.A. continuous cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum induced
I7 Lindberg, S.C. and A.R. Moreira. 1982. Production of neu- by viologen dyes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53: 1232-1235.
tral solvents from cheese whey. American Chemical Society 26 Ressen, L. and L. Strube. 1978. Complete utilization of whey
National Meeting, Kansas City, U.S.A., September 12-17. for alcohol and methane production. Process Biochem. 3:
18 Maddox, I.S. 1980. Production of n-butanol from whey fil- 21-24.
trate using Clostridium acetobutylicum N.C.I.B. 2951. Bio- 27 Rogers, P. 1986. Genetics and biochemistry of Clostridium
technol. Lett. 2: 493-498. relevant to development of fermentation processes. Adv.
19 McCoy, E., E.B. Fred, W.H. Patterson and E.G. Hastings. Appl. Microbiol. 31: 1-59.
i930. A cultural study of certain anaerobic butyric acid 28 Rogers, P. and W.R. Hansen. 1983. Abstr. Annu. Meet. Am.
forming bacteria. J. Infect. Dis. 46: 118-137. Soc. Microbiol. pp. 239.
20 Meyrath, J. and K. Bayer. 1979. Biomass from Whey. In: 29 Srinivas, S.P. and R. Mutharasan. 1987. Culture fluorescence
Economic Microbiology, Vol. 4 (Rose, A.H., ed.), pp. 207- characteristics and metabolic significance in batch cultures
268, Academic Press, New York. of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol. Lett. 9: 139-142.
21 Monot, F. 1983. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the Institute 30 Stevens, D., S. Alam and R.K. Bajpai. 1987. Fermentation
of the National Polytechnic of Lorraine, University of Nan- of cheese whey by a mixed culture of Clostridium beijerinckii
cy, France. and Bacilus cereus. J. Ind. Microbiol., 3: in press.
22 Monot, F., J.M. Engasser and H. Petitdemange. 1984. Influ- 31 Van de Lek, J.B. 1930, Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the
ence of pH and undissociated acids on the production of Technische Hogeschool, The Netherlands.
acetone and butanol in batch cultures of Clostridium aceto- 32 Van Uden, N. 1985. Ethanol toxicity and ethanol tolerance
butylicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 422-426. in yeasts. Annu. Rep. Ferment. Process. 8: 11-58.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen