Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. of sessions: 65
Along with the above syllabus the Judiciary interpretation in connection with the
provisions of different applications of procedure will be discussed.
CASE LAWS:
17. Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Flock (India) (P) Ltd., Kanpur, AIR 2000 SC
2484
18. Vithal (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 1891. (The Court cannot
derive jurisdiction apart from the Statute. No amount of waiver or consent can confer
jurisdiction on the Court if it inherently lacks it or if none exists)
19. Swastik Gases Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (2013) 9 SCC 32).
20. Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics (P) Ltd. V. Chand Mal Baradia & Ors., AIR 2005 SC
2161(The Court is bound to determine exclusively jurisdictional issue before granting
relief.)
21. Abdul Rahman V. Prasony Bai & Anr., AIR 2003 SC 718.( explains grounds for
transfer of proceedings)
22. Gyanmati Yadav v. Ram Sagar Yadav, (2013) 14 SCC 621.( inconvenience of a party
cannot be a ground for transfer)
23. Radhakrishna Murthy Vs Special Dy. Collector 2003(4) ALT 576 (sec. 5 of
Limitation Act)
24. AP State Electricity Board Vs Cantonment Board 1976(1) APLJ 269 (claim not made
within 3 years by mistake of the plaintiff. Extension of the period of Limitation
cannot be claimed under sec.17 of Limitation Act)
25. B.K.N. Pillai Vs P. Pillai & Anr. AIR 2000 SC 614 (the Supreme Court observed that
where an amendment is found to be necessary for promoting the ends of justice and
not for defeating the same the application should be allowed)