Sie sind auf Seite 1von 9

J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285

DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0399-y

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION - HUMAN/ANIMAL TISSUE

Analysis of transforming growth factor b receptor expression


and signaling in higher grade meningiomas
Mahlon D. Johnson Aubie K. Shaw

Mary J. OConnell Fraser J. Sim


Harold L. Moses

Received: 23 June 2010 / Accepted: 31 August 2010 / Published online: 19 September 2010
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Abstract TGF-b receptors (TGF-bRs) inhibit growth of only attenuated TGF-bRIII expression and TGFB growth
many cell types. Loss of TGF-bRs or its signaling com- inhibition may occur in select higher grade meningiomas.
ponents have been found in several human malignancies. Nonetheless, restoring TGF-b inhibition of meningioma
The expression and the role of TGF-bRs in regulating cell proliferation may be an important objective in the
anaplastic meningioma growth has not been studied. Real design of new chemotherapies for these tumors.
time PCR found TGF-b RIII expression significantly lower
in five grade III compared to eight grade I and eight Keywords Meningioma  Anaplastic meningioma 
grade II tumors (P = 0.0481). By western blot analysis, TGF-b receptors  TGF-b  SMAD 3  MAPK
TGF-bRI was detected in the four fetal and adult lepto-
meninges, all 18 grade I, 14 grade II and six grade III
meningiomas. TGF-bRII was detected in none of the lep- Introduction
tomeninges, 55% of grade I, 71% of grade II and weak to
negative in five of six the grade III meningiomas analyzed. The transforming growth factor-bs (TGF-b) represents an
TGF-bRIII immunoreactivity was not detected in the fetal important family of peptides that inhibit proliferation of
meninges but was detected in 94% of grade I, 70% of grade nearly all normal epithelial cells, mesenchymal cells and
II and 67% grade III tumors. Phospho-SMAD 3 and Smad cells from some low grade neoplasias [1, 2]. However, loss
7 were detected in nearly all tumors. TGF-b1 had no effect of TGF-b inhibitory effects is seen in higher grade tumors
on PDGF-BB stimulation of DNA synthesis in six of seven [24]. In many cases, this is due to loss or inactivation of
WHO grade II and the grade III cells. It produced an TGF-b type I receptor (TGF-bRI), TGF-b type II receptor
increase in phosphorylation of SMAD 3 and p38MAPK in (TGF-bRII) or signaling components such as SMAD 2, 3 and
two of four and p44/42MAPK in three of four grade II cells 4 [24]. Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas have not been
showing no change in DNA synthesis after treatment. Thus, evaluated for defects in TGF-bR expression or signaling.
The TGF-b superfamily includes three closely related
25 kDa dimeric, disulfide bonded ligands [1, 5]. TGF-b
M. D. Johnson (&)  M. J. OConnell
effects are largely transduced through binding to the
Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology,
University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave. TGF-b type II receptor (TGF-bRII) that then complexes
Box 626, Rochester, NY 14642, USA with the TGF-b type I receptor phosphorylating and
e-mail: mahlon_johnson@urmc.rochester.edu activating its serine/threonine kinase (TGF-bRI) [6].
TGF-bRIII i.e. betaglycan, is a membrane glycoprotein
F. J. Sim
Center for Translational Neuromedicine, Department of which facilitates TGF-b binding to the TGF-bRII [2]. The
Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, activated TGF-bRI receptor phosphorylates a number of
University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA membrane/cytoplasmic proteins which transduce growth
regulatory signals to the nucleus [6]. Previously, we have
A. K. Shaw  H. L. Moses
Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer shown that TGF-b1, 2 and 3 as well as TGF-b receptors I,
Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA II and III are expressed in human leptomeninges and World

123
278 J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285

Health Organization (WHO) grade I meningiomas [79]. including 18 grade I, 14 grade II and six grade III menin-
WHO grade I meningioma cells synthesize and release all giomas [27] were obtained primarily from the Cooperative
three (presumably latent) TGF-b isoforms [7]. TGF-b is Human Tissue Network (Philadelphia, PA) or collected at
also present in human CSF that bathes meningiomas [8, 10, URMC with Institutional Review Board approval. Patient
11] and in media conditioned by leptomeningeal cells [8]. and tumor characteristics are listed in Table 1.
In vitro, TGF-b1 reduced basal proliferation in 47% of
meningioma cell cultures from 15 WHO grade I meningi- RNA analysis of TGF-b RI, TGF-b RII and TGF-b
omas [7, 9] and attenuated epidermal growth factor induced RIII, SMAD 7, PAI-1 and HGF in meningioma tumors
proliferation in five of six [9]. Thus, paracrine or autocrine
release of TGF-b1 from leptomeninges or meningioma RNA was isolated from eight WHO grade I, eight WHO
cells may tonically suppress growth of human leptome- grade II and five WHO grade III meningiomas using Trizol
ningeal and WHO grade I meningioma cells by activation reagent (Invitrogen) followed by DNAse (Promega) fol-
of these receptors. TGF-b1 in cerebrospinal fluid also may lowing manufacturer specifications. One microgram of
limit grade I meningioma growth [9]. This raises the pos- total RNA was reverse transcribed to generate cDNA using
sibility that loss of TGF-b inhibitory effects may contribute M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Relative
to progression of meningioma cells. mRNA quantity was determined by real-time PCR using
The main signal effectors for TGF-b are the SMADs 2 and Sybr green quantitation with iCycler instrumentation and
3 [12, 13]. SMAD 3 is activated by TGF-b and regulates cell software (BioRad, Hercules, CA). Plasminogen activator
proliferation [2, 5]. Activation of the TGF-bR II phosphor- inhibitor type 1 gene (PAI-1) and hepatocyte growth factor
ylates the type I receptor cytoplasmic domain which, in turn, (HGF) are two genes activated by TGF-bI [28, 29]. Primer
phosphorylates the carboxyterminal domain of SMAD 2 and sequences are available by contacting the authors. Gene
SMAD 3 resulting in their heteromerization with SMAD 4 in expression was assessed relative to GAPDH gene expres-
the cytoplasm. The activated SMAD 2, 3 and 4 complex sion and analyzed by KruskalWallis non-parametric test-
translocates to the nucleus where they interact with and sta- ing and unpaired t-tests with the software program
bilize transcriptional complexes of numerous transcription GraphPad Prizm v 5.0c.
factors [3, 12, 13]. Loss of SMAD 2, 3 and 4 has been asso-
ciated with several forms of cancer [1, 2]. In WHO grade I Western blots
meningioma cells TGF-b signaling is associated with TGF-b1
phosphorylation of SMAD 2/3 [9]. Nonetheless, the role of Protein from meningiomas was obtained by mechanical
SMAD 2, 3 and 4 in transduction of growth regulatory signals homogenization in RIPA Lysis Buffer (Upstate Biotech-
in WHO grade II and III meningiomas is unknown. nology) with 1:100 Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma)
Under some circumstances, TGF-b utilizes other sig- then frozen at -85C. The tissue slurries were thawed on
naling pathways including the RAF- MAPK/Erk kinase- ice and vortexed vigorously. Solids were removed by
1(MEK-1)-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) centrifugation. Protein concentrations were quantified
pathways [1420] and phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)- using a Bradford assay (BioRad Protein Assay reagent),
protein kinase B/Akt-p70S6K [2124] and p38-JNK then 35 lg protein from each was loaded on 7.5% acryl-
pathways [18, 23]. While these pathways do not appear amide gel then transferred to 0.45 lm nitrocellulose
activated by TGF-b1 in WHO grade I meningiomas, they membrane. The membrane was blocked overnight at 4C in
have been found to be activated by some cytokines in grade 5% milk in TrisCl buffer with Tween 20 then incubated
II and III meningiomas [25, 26]. Nonetheless, their role in with monoclonal antibodies to: TGF-b RI, TGF-b RII,
transducing TGF-b signals in higher grade meningiomas TGF-b RIII, p- SMAD 3, SMAD 7 (all R and D, Minne-
has not been studied. apolis) and Merlin (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly,
In the present study, we evaluated whether grade II or III MA).
meningiomas show a loss of TGF-bRs or alterations in
known TGF-b signaling pathways. Meningioma cell cultures

Primary meningioma cell cultures were established from


Materials and methods seven grade II and one grade III meningiomas as described
previously (Table 2) [30]. For experiments, only early
Meningioma tissue passages i.e. passage 25 were used. For immunocyto-
chemical characterization, meningioma cell cultures were
Frozen normal leptomeninges from four human fetuses and plated onto 4-well microscope slides (Nalgene NUNC Int.,
one adult and tissue from 37 sporadic meningiomas Rochester, NY) for 1 day in supplemented DMEM then

123
J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285 279

Table 1 Leptomeninges and meningiomas for TGF-beta receptor fixed in formalin. Immunocytochemistry was performed
Western blots and/or PCR using a mouse monoclonal antibody against epithelial
Leptomeninges/ Age/ Location Classification Merlin membrane antigen (EMA) (prediluted, DAKO, Carpente-
meningioma gender (Western ria, CA) and in most cases Desmoplakin (1:200, Abcam
blots) Inc. Cambridge Mass) using the avidinbiotin-horseradish
L1 16 week Convexity Normal n.d. peroxidase method. The presence or loss of Neurofibro-
L2 20 week Convexity Normal n.d. matosis-2 gene product Merlin was assessed by western
L3 22 week Convexity Normal ? blot. (Table 3).
L4 23 week Convexity Normal n.d.
L5 Adult Convexity Normal n.d. TGF-b1 effects on meningioma cell proliferation
1 48 F R Sphenoid Meningo I ? and signaling
2 53 F R Convexity Mixed I ?
3 51 F Convexity Meningo I ? Primary cultures from seven grade II and one grade III
4 66 F R Frontal Trans I meningiomas were also plated in 96-well plates, serum
5 71 F R Convexity Meningo I ? deprived overnight then treated with DMEM, or DMEM
6 57 F L Frontal Meningo I with TGF-b1 (10 ng/ml), PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml) or
7 42 M L Frontal Trans I ? PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml) and TGF-b1 (10 ng/ml) for 72 h.
8 46 F Convexity Meningo I ? Cells from four WHO grade II meningiomas were also
9 F R Frontal Fibro I ? treated as above for 24 h. Cells from MC3 and 4 were also
10 56 F Convexity Trans I ? treated with PDGF and 1.0, 5.0 or 10 ng/ml TGF-b1. Cells
11 35 F R Temporal Trans I ? were subsequently analyzed in quadruplicate by CyQUANT
12 70 F Convexity Mixed I Cell Proliferation assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
13 40 F R Parietal Fibro I CyQUANT fluorescence dye binds nucleic acid. Two hun-
14 71 F R frontal Meningo I ?
dred microliters of CyQUANT GR solution was added to
15 50 M Sphenoid Fibro I ?
each well for 5 min at room temperature according to assay
specifications. Fluorescence, measured at an excitation
16 79 F L Sphenoid Meningo I
wavelength of 480 and emission wavelength of 520 nm was
17 38 F R Temporal Meningo I
measured by a plate reader. Differences between treatment
18 67 F Post fossa Trans I
groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-tests (In Stat,
19 85 M L Temporal Trans II ?
Sigma, St. Louis).
20 67 M Frontal Trans II ?
To evaluate TGF-b1 signaling, cells from four WHO
21 73 M Convexity Menino/trans II ?
grade II meningiomas were also treated as above for 4 h
22 97 F Convexity Meningo II ?
then evaluated by Western blot for phosphorylation/acti-
23 14 M Frontal Fibrous II ?
vation of Smad 3, p-38MAPK and p44/42.
24 51 F Rt. Frontal Trans II ?
25 35 F L frontal Fibrous II
26 43 M T4 Trans II ?
Results
27 39 F R frontal Microcystic II ?
28 49 F Sella Meningo II ?
RNA analysis of TGF-b RI, TGF-b RII and TGF-b
29 54 F L1 Spine Fibrous II ?
RIII, SMAD 7, PAI and HGF in meningioma tumors
30 91 F L Frontal Meningo II ?
31 60 F Parasaggital Mixed II
Real-time PCR detected RNA for TGF-b RI, TGF-b RII
32 70 F L Frontal Trans II ?
and TGF-b RIII in eight of eight WHO grade I and eight of
33 26 F Skull base Ana III ?
eight WHO grade II and five of five WHO grade III
34 79 M L Frontal Trans III ?
meningiomas. TGF-b RI was not significantly lower in the
35 70 F Parietal Fibrous III
three grades (P = 0.2573) and was not statistically different
36. 69 M R Frontal Ana III
between grade I and III by t-test (P = 0.2425). TGF-b RII
37. 72 F R temporal Ana III n.a. was not significantly lower in the three grades
38. 74 M R Frontal Ana III ? (P = 0.8728) and was not statistically different between
n.a. not analyzed; n.d. not done grade I and III by t-test (P = 0.4255). TGF-b RIII was

123
280 J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285

Table 2 Sources of
Leptomeninges/ Age/gender Location Classification WHO grade
meningioma cell cultures
meningioma

MC1 79 F Frontal Meningothelial II


MC2 (M26) 51 F R frontal Transitional II
MC3 (M27) 35 F L frontal Fibrous II
MC4 (M28) 43 F T4 Ttransitional II
MC5 (M29) 43 F R Frontal Microcystic II
MC6 74 M Ethmoid Secretory II
MC7 57 F L frontal Transitional II
MC8 11 F Convexity Papillary III

Table 3 Summary of TGF-bR protein, RNA and response to TGF-bI in meningiomas


Grade I meningioma protein Grade II Grade III mRNA differences in
meningioma meningioma grade I and II vs grade III
protein protein meningiomas

TGF-bRI 18/18 14/14 6/6 P = 0.257


TGF-bRII 10/18 11/14 5/6 P = 0.872
TGF-bRIII 17/18 10/14 4/6 P = 0.048
p-SMAD3 18/18 13/14 5/6 n.a.
SMAD7 18/18 14/14 5/6 P = 0.143
Response to TGF-bI Reduced basal proliferation in 7 of 15 (7); No growth No growth
attanuated stimulated proliferation inhibition inhibition
in 5 of 6 (9)
n.a. not analyzed

significantly different (P = 0.0481) and approached sig- SMAD 7 was detected in all grade I, 13 of 14 grade II and 5
nificance between grade I and III by t-test (P = 0.1971) of 6 grade III tumors (Fig. 2).
(Fig. 1). PAI-1 expression was not statistically different Merlin was detected in 11 of 18 (61%) of grade I, 12 of 14
between grade I and III. HGF was also similar between (86%) and 3 of 5 (60%) meningiomas (Table 1), primarily in
groups (P = 0.2724) and between grade I and III by t-tests meningothelial but showed no correlation with the presence
(P = 0.3173). SMAD 7 expression trended lower but was of TGF-bRI, TGF-bRII or TGF-bRIII protein (Table 1).
not significant in the three grades (P = 0.1432) and
between grade I and III by t-test (P = 0.2406). Primary meningioma cell cultures

Western blot analysis of TGF-b RI, TGF-b RII, TGF-b The meningioma cell cultures appeared homogeneous and
RIII, p-SMAD 3, SMAD 7 and Merlin were populated by large polygonal cells with irregular
borders and central round to oval nuclei and nucleoli. By
By Western blot analysis, TGF-bRI was detected in the 16, immunocytochemistry, meningioma cells exhibited exten-
20, 22, 23 week fetal and one adult leptomeningeal sample sive EMA and variable desmoplakin immunostaining in
(not shown), all 18 of 18 WHO grade I meningiomas, 14 of nonconfluent dispersed cells of each meningioma cell
14 grade II and 6 of 6 grade III meningiomas analyzed. culture. By western blot, Merlin was detected in the lep-
TGF-bRII was detected in none of the leptomeningeal tomeningeal and five of seven meningioma cell cultures
samples (not shown), 10 of 18 WHO grade I meningiomas, (MC2, MC5, MC6, MC8 and MC11) evaluated but not in
11 of 14 grade II and weak to negative at 75 kDa in the 5 of MC4 or MC7.
6 grade III meningiomas analyzed. TGF-bRIII was not
detected in the 16, 20, 22, 23 week fetal leptomeninges but TGF-b1 effects on meningioma primary cell culture
was detected in 17 of 18 grade I and 10 of 14 grade II proliferation and signaling
(variable to weak in four) and four of six grade III tumors
(Fig. 2). At 24 h TGF-b1 (10 ng/ml) had no effect on basal cell
Phospho-SMAD 3 was detected in all 18 of 18 grade I, proliferation, based on DNA analysis with CyQUANT, in
13 of 14 grade II and 5 of 6 WHO grade III meningiomas. four of four WHO grade II meningioma cells. TGF-b1 had

123
J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285 281

Fig. 1 RNA analysis of TGF-b


RI, TGF-b RII and TGF-b RIII,
SMAD 7, PAI and HGF in
WHO grade I, II and III
meningiomas. Messenger RNA
concentrations 8 WHO grade I,
8 WHO grade II and 5 WHO
grade III meningiomas relative
to GAPDH were analyzed by
KruskalWallis test (mean and
standard error). TGF-b RIII
mRNA was reduced in WHO
grade III meningiomas
compared to grade I and II
tumors. Plasminogen activator
inhibitor type 1 gene (PAI-1)
and hepatocyte growth factor
(HGF) are two genes activated
by TGF-bI

no effect on PDGF-BB-mediated stimulation of prolifera- Discussion


tion in the four meningiomas.
At 72 h, TGF-b1 (10 ng/ml) had no effect on basal cell Findings from the present study suggest that higher grade
proliferation, based on DNA analysis with CyQUANT, in meningiomas do not exhibit reduced expression of
seven of seven WHO grade II and the WHO grade III TGF-bRI but may, in a limited number of tumor, have
meningioma cells. TGF-b1 significantly reduced PDGF-BB altered TGF-bRIII expression and show attenuated TGF-b1
stimulation of DNA synthesis in the 22 week fetal lepto- growth inhibition. TGF-bRIII mRNA, and in some cases
meninges but had no effect on PDGF-BB stimulation in six TGF-bRIII protein was significantly reduced in WHO
of seven WHO grade II and the WHO grade III meningioma grade III compared to lower grade meningiomas. Because
(Fig. 3, and not shown). TGF-b effects are initiated by binding to the TGF-b type II
By Western blot, TGF-b1 (10 ng/ml) treatment pro- and III receptors, a genetic or epigenetic reduction in the
duced an increase in phosphorylation of SMAD 3 in two of concentration of receptors might result in attenuated
four WHO grade II meningioma cultures which had shown TGF-b growth inhibition permitting less restrained growth
no change in DNA synthesis after treatment. Compared to of higher grade meningiomas. Loss of TGF-bRs has also
controls, TGF-b1 alone or with PDGF-BB also increased been described in numerous other malignancies. Missense
phosphorylation of p38MAPK in two of four and p44/42 or frameshift mutations in the TGF-bRI has been demon-
MAPK in three of four WHO grade II meningioma cell strated in head and neck, esophageal, breast and ovarian
cultures (Fig. 4). carcinomas [2, 3, 3135]. Epigenetic decreased expression

123
282 J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285

Fig. 2 Western blot analysis TGF-b RI, TGF-b RII, TGF-b RIII, 75 KDa bands. TGF-b RIII is expressed as multiple 100 to 200 kDa
p-SMAD 3 and Smad 7 in meningiomas. Frozen tissue from WHO bands. TGF-bRII was detected in 55% of grade I, 71% of grade II and
grade I (a, 19), grade II (b, 2432) and grade III (c, 3338) was weak to negative in the grade III meningiomas analyzed
meningiomas were analyzed. TGF-b RII are expressed as 71 and

in TGF-bRI has been found in gastric carcinoma [2]. effects in meningioma cells with low, but still partially
Inactivating mutations in TGF-bRII, often in tumors with functional receptors. Recently, the extent of SMAD and/or
microsatellite instability, are far more common, being p44/42 MAPK activation by TGF-b1 have been correlated
found in head and neck carcinomas, esophageal, pulmon- with TGF-b RII levels with lower levels favoring activa-
ary, biliary, gastric, colonic and ovarian carcinomas [2, 3, tion of the latter pathway [50]. This raised the possibility
33, 3639]. Loss or downregulation of the TGF-bRIII may that as meningiomas progress and TGF-b RII levels
be the most prevalent receptor changes in malignancies decline, non-SMAD, non-inhibitory pathways regulating
having been identified in neuroblastomas, ovarian, endo- other cell functions may occur.
metrial and prostate carcinoma, renal and non-small cell SMAD 7 is a known inhibitor of TGF-b signaling and
pulmonary cancers [4047]. Loss of TGF-bRIIIs may also part of complex feedback loops regulating TGF-b effects
permit progression of breast cancer [48]. In addition, [2, 3]. Overexpression of SMAD 7, compromising TGF-b
recent, comparative genomic hybridization identified a effects, has been found in thyroid and endometrial carci-
2.3-fold reduction in TGF-bRIII gene copy in high pro- nomas [5153]. Nonetheless, in the present study, SMAD
liferative meningiomas [49]. 7 expression was not increased or significantly different
TGF-b1 had no detectable effect on cell proliferation in between grades of meningiomas and SMAD 7 protein was
six of seven WHO grade II and the grade III meningioma. detected in all of the WHO grade I, II and III tumors. In
In contrast, we have previously found that TGF-b1 pro- contrast, a recent comparative genomic hybridization
duced mild growth inhibition in some WHO grade I [7, 9]. study found a three-fold reduction in SMAD 7 gene
Although it was only possible to culture one WHO grade expression in high grade compared to low grade menin-
III meningioma over a number of years, collectively the giomas [40]. Future studies may clarify the role, if any, of
findings raise the possibility that reduced TGF-b1 growth SMAD7 in modulating TGF-b regulation of meningioma
inhibitory signaling is present in at least some higher grade growth.
tumors. Additional larger studies, may clarify whether a Expression of TGF-bRs, SMAD 7, pSMAD 3 and
loss of TGF-b signaling contributes to anaplasia in phosphorylation of SMAD 3 did not correlate with the
meningiomas. presence or absence of Merlin in any grade of meningio-
TGF-b1 stimulated an increase in p38 phosphorylation mas. Consequently, Merlin may not regulate TGF-bRs or
in two and p44/42 MAPK in three meningioma cell cul- SMAD 3 phosphorylation. The role of NF-2 gene expres-
tures from grade II meningiomas. This raises the possibility sion and Merlin in the pathogenesis of sporadic meningi-
that p38 and/or p44/42 MAPK transduce some TGF-b omas remains uncertain. Moreover, loss of Merlin may not

123
J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285 283

synthesize and secrete all three isoforms of TGF-b [8]. In


combination with TGF-b in CSF, this may exert a chronic
inhibitory or differentiating effect on cells in the lepto-
meninges [8]. Conceivably, this effect continues in nascent,
slow growing foci of meningioma cells and contributes to
the long, minimally symptomatic period in patients
developing these tumors. A reduction in TGF-bRs and/or
sensitivity to TGF-b growth inhibition may occur with
progression [56]. This scenario is seen in astrocytes and
low grade astrocytomas that secrete TGF-b-1 and 2 and are
inhibited by exogenous TGF-b. However, dedifferentiating
astrocytoma cells become progressively resistant to the
growth inhibitory effects of TGF-b as they evolve into
malignant gliomas [57]. Similarly, intestinal epithelium
and benign adenoma cells are also inhibited by TGF-b but
become progressively resistant to TGF-b as adenoma cells
dedifferentiate into carcinomas [5860]. Other studies have
noted loss of sensitivity to TGF-b due to decreased
expression in ovarian or colorectal carcinomas [33, 38] or
mutations in the TGF-bRI genes occurs in primary and
metastatic breast carcinomas [32]. Loss of sensitivity to the
inhibitory effects of TGF-b in meningiomas might also be
downstream from receptor activation via alterations in
SMAD signaling. Moreover, this might be in concert with
other growth factors. For example, activation of mitogenic
EGF receptors (present on meningioma cells) activates
Fig. 3 Effects of TGF-b1 on WHO grade II (a) and grade II (MC5-7)
and III (MC8) meningioma cell proliferation (b). Meningioma cells MAPK/Erk kinase which hyperphosphorylates SMAD 2
were treated with TGF-b1 (10 ng/ml) and or PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml) and 3 preventing their movement into the nucleus and
for 72 h. CyQUANT analysis of DNA measured by fluorescence at TGF-b signaling [48]. EGF also increases SMAD 7 which
480/520 nm. Changes in DNA fluorescence correlates with cell
is inhibitory to SMAD 2/3 signaling [51]. Thus, early in the
proliferation. TGF-b1 failed to suppress basal proliferation in cells
from all 8 higher grade primary meningioma cultures and PDGF development of meningiomas, other factors may slowly
stimulation of proliferation in 6 of 7 WHO grade II and the grade III override any tonic inhibitory effects on meningioma cell
meningioma cells. Bars represent standard errors. * P\ 0.05, proliferation. Studies underway may clarify if, during
** P\ 0.01, *** P\ 0.005, **** P\ 0.001, ***** P\ 0.0005
dedifferentiation, TGF-bs inhibition of meningioma cell
growth is overridden by other signaling or TGF-b
correlate consistently with dedifferentiation and progres- switches from an inhibitory to stimulatory influence.
sion of meningiomas [54, 55]. In summary, this study found only reduced expression of
The role of TGF-b in the pathogenesis of meningiomas TGF-bRIII in a limited number of grade III meningiomas
remains to be established. Normal leptomeninges appear to and reduced sensitivity to TGF-b1 growth inhibition.

Fig. 4 Western blot analysis of TGF-b1 effects on SMAD 3, DNA synthesis after treatment. TGF-b1 also increased phosphoryla-
p38MAPK and p44/42 MAPK phosphorylation/activation in menin- tion of p38MAPK in 2 of 4 compared with controls and phosphor-
gioma cells cultured from WHO grade II meningiomas. TGF-b1 ylation was detected in p44/42 MAPK in 3 of 5. C control, T TGF-b1,
produced a mild increase in phosphorylation of SMAD 3 in 2 of 4 P PDGF-BB
WHO grade II meningioma cultures which had shown no change in

123
284 J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285

Although suggestive, the prevalence and impact of these N-terminal kinase activation by transforming growth factor b in
findings remains to be established and defects in TGF-bR negative growth control of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res
57:628633
III may only occur in a subpopulation of meningiomas. 19. Lewis TS, Shapiro PS, Ahn NG (1998) Signal transduction
Nonetheless, restoring or boosting TGF-b inhibition of through MAP Kinase cascades. Adv Cancer Res 74:49139
meningioma cell proliferation may be an important 20. Kawabata M, Imanura T, Miyazono K, Engel ME, Moses HL
objective in the design of new chemotherapies for select (1995) Interaction of the transforming growth factor-b type 1
receptor with farnesyl-protein transferase-a. J Biol Chem
meningiomas. 270:2962829631
21. Higaki M, Shimokado K (1999) PI3K. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol 19:21272132
22. Bakin AV, Tomlinson AK, Bhowmick NA, Moses HL, Arteaga
CL (2000) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function is required for
References transforming growth factor b-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal
transition and cell migration. J Biol Chem 275:3680336810
1. Piel E, Roberts AB (2001) Suppressor and oncogenic roles of 23. Ravanti L, Hakkinen L, Larjava H, Saarialho-Kere U, Foschi M,
transforming growth factor-B and its signaling pathways in Han J, Kahari VM (1999) Induction of collagenase-3 (MMP-13)
tumorigenesis. Adv Cancer Res 83:154 expression in human skip fibroblasts by three-dimensional col-
2. Massague J (2008) TGF-B in cancer. Cell 134:215230 lagen is mediated by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol
3. Levy L, Hill CS (2006) Alterations in components of the Chem 274:3729237300
TGF-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human cancer. 24. Vivanco I, Sawyers CL (2002) The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17:4158 AKT pathway in human cancer. Cell Signal 14:381395
4. Millet C, Zhang YE (2007) Roles of Smad3 in TGF-B signaling 25. Johnson MD, OConnell M, Vito F, Bakos RS (2009) Increased
during carcinogenesis. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 17:281293 STAT-3 and synchronous activation of Raf-1-MEK-1-MAPK,
5. Miyazono K, Kusanagi K, Inoue H (2001) Divergence and con- and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Akt-mTOR pathways in
vergence of TGF-bBMP signaling. J Cell Phys 187:265276 atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. J Neuro-Oncol 92:129135
6. Massaque L (1992) Receptors for the TGF-b family. Cell 26. Johnson MD, OConnell MJ, Pilcher W, Jay Reeder J (2010)
69:10671070 Fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 expression in meningiomas
7. Johnson MD, Federspiel CF, Gold LI, Moses HL (1992) Trans- and promotion of proliferation by activation of the PI3K-Akt
forming growth factor-b and transforming growth factor-b pathway. J Neurosurg 112:934939
receptor expression in human meningioma cells. Am J Pathol 27. Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW et al (2007) Meningiomas.
141:631642 In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds)
8. Johnson MD, Gold LI, Moses HL (1992) Evidence for TGF-b Tumours of the nervous system. WHO Press, Geneva, pp 164172
expression in human leptomeningeal cells and TGF-b-like 28. Matrisian LM, Hogan BL (1990) Growth factor-regulated pro-
activity in human cerebrospinal fluid. Lab Invest 67:360368 teases and extracellular matrix remodeling during mammalian
9. Johnson MD, Okediji E, Woodard A (2004) Transforming growth development. Curr Top Dev Biol 24:219259
factor-b effects on meningioma cell proliferation and signal 29. Fausto N (1991) Growth factors in liver development, regenera-
transduction pathways. J Neurooncol 66:916 tion and carcinogenesis. Prog Growth Factor Res 3:219234
10. Redzic ZB, Preston JE, Duncan JA et al (2005) The choroid 30. Johnson MD, Vito F, OConnell MJ, Pilcher W (2009) Bone
plexus-cerebrospinal fluid system: from development to aging. morphogenetic protein-4 and receptors are expressed in the lep-
Curr Top Dev Biol 71:152 tomeninges and meningiomas and signal via MAPK. J Neuropa-
11. Vawter MP, Dillon-Carter O, Tourtellote WW, Carvey P, Freed thol Exp Neurol 68:11771183
WJ (1996) TGF-beta 1 and TGFbeta 2 concentrations are ele- 31. Knobloch TJ, Lynch MA, Song H et al (2001) Analysis of TGF-b
vated in Parkinsons disease in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid. type I receptor for mutations in polymorphisms in head and neck
Exp Neurol 142:313322 cancers. Mutation Res 479:131139
12. Zhang Y, Feng X-H, Wu RY, Derynk R (1996) Receptor asso- 32. Chen T, Triplett J, Dehner B et al (1998) Transforming growth
ciated Mad homologues synergize as effectors of the TGF-b factor beta type I receptor kinase mutant associated with meta-
response. Nature 383:168172 static breast cancer. Cancer Res 58:48054810
13. Zhang Y, Derynk R (1999) Regulation of Smad signaling by 33. Chen T, Carter D, Garrigue-Antar L et al (2001) Transforming
protein associations and signaling crosstalk. Trend Cell Biol growth factor b type I receptor gene is frequently mutated in
9:274279 ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 61:46794682
14. Mulder KM (2000) Role of Ras and Mapks in TGFB signalling. 34. Jin G, Deng Y, Miao R et al (2008) TGFB1 and TGFBR2
Cytokines Growth Factor Rev 11:2335 functional polymorphisms and risk of esophageal squamous cell
15. Javelaud D, Mauviel A (2005) Cross talk mechanisms between carcinoma: a case-control analysis in the Chinese population.
the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways and Smad sig- J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134:345351
naling downstream of TGF-beta: implications for carcinogenesis. 35. Kretzschmar M (2000) Transforming growth factor-b and breast
Oncogene 24:57425750 cancer: transforming growth factor-b/SMAD signaling defects
16. Yan Z, Winawer S, Friedman E (1994) Two different signal and cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2:107115
transduction pathways can be activated by transforming growth 36. Ohue M, Tomita N, Mondeb et al (1996) Mutations of the
factor b1 in epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 269:1323113237 transforming growth factor receptor type II receptor gene and
17. Mucsi I, Skorecki KL, Goldberg HJ (1996) Extracellular signal- microsatellite instability in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer
regulated kinase and the small GTP-binding protein, Rac, con- 68:203206
tribute to the effects of transforming growth factor-b1 on gene 37. Wang JC, Su CC, Xu JB et al (2007) Novel microdeletion in the
expression. J Biol Chem 271:1656716572 transforming growth factor b type II receptor gene is associated
18. Frey RS, Mulder KM (1997) Involvement of extracellular signal- with giant and large cell variants of nonsmall cell lung carci-
regulated kinase 2 and stress-activated protein kinase/Jun noma. Gene Chromosome Cancer 26:192201

123
J Neurooncol (2011) 103:277285 285

38. Xanfei Xu, Pasche B (2007) TGF-B signaling alterations and biological effects of TGF-b. Biochim Biophys Acta
susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Hum Mol Genet 16:R14 1793:11651193
R20 51. Nakano A, Afrakhte M, Moren A, Nakayama T, Christian JL,
39. Howe JR, Roth S, Ringold JC et al (1998) Mutations in the Heuchel R, Itoh S, Kawabata M, Heldin HE, Heldin CH, ten
SMAD4/DPC4 gene in juvenile polyposis. Science 280: Dijke P (1997) Identification of Smad 7 a TGF-b inducible
10861088 antagonist of TGF-b signaling. Nature 389:631635
40. Iolascon L, Giodani A, Borrielo R et al (2000) Reduced expres- 52. Cerutti JM, Ebina KN, Se Matsuo et al (2003) Expression of
sion of transforming growth factor-beta receptor type III in high Smad4 and Smad7 in human thyroid follicular carcinoma cell
stage neuroblastomas. Br J Cancer 82:11711176 lines. J Endocrinol 26:516521
41. Hempel N, How T, Dong SK et al (2007) Loss of betaglycan 53. Dowdy SC, Mariani A, Reinholz MM et al (2005) Overexpres-
expression in ovarian cancer: role in motility and invasion. sion of the TGF-beta antagonist Smad 7 in endometrial cancer.
Cancer 67:52315238 Gynecol Oncol 96:368373
42. Bilandzic S, Chu PG, Farnworth C et al (2009) Loss of beta- 54. Perry A, Gutman DH, Reifenberger G (2004) Molecular patho-
glycan contributes to the malignant properties of human granu- genesis of meningiomas. J Neuro-Oncol 70:183202
losa tumor cells. Mol Endocrinol 23:539548 55. Riemenschneider MJ, Perry A, Reifenberger G (2006) Histolog-
43. Florio P, Ciarmela FM, Reis P et al (2005) Inhibin alpha subunit ical classification and molecular genetics of meningiomas. Lancet
and the inhibin co-receptor betaglycan are downregulated in Neurol 5:10451054
endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 152:277284 56. Johnson MD, Toms S (2005) Mitogenic signal transduction
44. Sharfi N, Hurt EM, Kawasaki BT et al (2007) TGFBR3 loss and pathways in meningiomas: novel targets for meningioma che-
consequences in prostate cancer. Prostate 67:301311 motherapy? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64:10291036
45. Turley RS, Finger EC, Hempel N et al (2007) The type III 57. Jennings MT, Maciunas RJ, Carver R, Bascom CC, Juneau P,
transforming growth factor-beta receptor as a novel tumor sup- Misulis K, Moses HL (1991) TGF-b 1 and TGF-b 2 are potential
pressor gene in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 67:10901098 growth regulators for low grade and malignant gliomas in
46. Copland JA, Luxon A, Ajani T et al (2003) Genomic profiling vitro:evidence in support of an autocrine hypothesis. Int J Cancer
identifies alterations in TGF beta signaling through loss of 49:129139
TGFbeta receptor expression in human renal cell carcinogenesis 58. Fan DS, Chakrabarty C, Seid CW, Bell H, Schackert K, Morik-
and progression. Oncogene 22:80538062 awa K, Fidler IJ (1989) Clonal stimulation or inhibition of human
47. Finger EC, Turley RS, Dong M et al (2008) TGF-beta RIII colon carcinomas and human renal carcinomas mediated by
suppresses non-small cell lung cancer invasiveness and tumori- transforming growth factor-beta 1. Cancer Commun 1:117125
genicity. Carcinogenesis 29:528535 59. Manning AM, Williams AC, Game SM, Paraskeva C (1991)
48. Dong M, How T, Kirkbride KC et al (2007) The type III Differential sensitivity of human colonic adenoma and carcinoma
TGF-beta receptor suppresses breast cancer progression. J Clin cells to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta): conversion
Invest 117:206217 of an adenoma cell line to a tumorigenic phenotype is accom-
49. Carvalho LH, Smirnov I, Baia GS et al (2007) Molecular sig- panied by a reduced response to the inhibitory effects of
natures define two main classes of meningiomas. Mol Cancer TGF-beta. Oncogene 6:14711476
6:6478 60. Matsushita M, Matsuraki K, Date M et al (1999) Down-regula-
50. Rojas A, Padidam M, Cress D, Grady W (2009) TGF-b receptor tion of TGF-b receptors in human colorectal cancer: implications
levels regulate the specificty of siganling pathway activation and for cancer development. Br J Cancer 80:194205

123

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen