Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
9.1 Background
T
HE RIVER DAMODAR (in Eastern India) was known for frequent
floods resulting in enormous loss of life and destruction of property.
The river runs 541 km from its origins in the Khamerpet Hills, in the
eastern part of India, to meet the river Hugli. The basin area is 17,506 sq. km
(refer Figure 9.1)*. In comparison, the River Ganges (or the Ganga as it is called in
India), of which the Damodar is a tributary, is over 5,000 km long and has a basin
area about 30 times as much as the Damodar.
The Damodar runs through some of the most mineral-rich regions of India. The
basin provides the country with valuable minerals, such as coal and iron ore.
There is also considerable agriculture in the region, with rice and potatoes being
the major crops. The basin is also probably one of the dirtiest parts of the country.
The levels of dust and smoke in most of the region are unimaginably high. The
chimneys of the hundreds of industrial units vie with the domestic coal-fired chulas
(crude stoves often used for cooking in Indian homes) to make the air dense with
smoke and soot. The many coal washeries empty thick black effluents into the
river at different points in its course.
The River Damodar is entirely rainfed. About 80% of the annual discharge occurs
during the four monsoon months from June to September. This seasonality and
the consequent imbalance in the flow had resulted in frequent flash floods, which
gave the Damodar its epithetriver of sorrow. To tame the violent river, a scheme
similar to the Tennessee Valley Authority Project (TVA) in the USA, was launched
in the 1950s and the Damodar Valley Corporation came into being. The scheme
essentially involved construction of dams along the length of the river, so that the
flow could be better harnessed for agriculture and industry.
*There has been a reorganization of states in India and part of the state of Bihar is now
called Jharkhand.
PUNJAB
Figure 9.1: Location of Damodar River Basin 116
UP HILLS in the South Asian Region
Dehra
Dun
HARYANA a
ng
ga
m
Ra
Delhi Moradabad N C H I N A
E TIBET
P
UTTAR A
Ga
ng PRADESH L Khatmandu
es SIKKIM
RAJASTHAN BHUTAN
Ganges
Ya Ga
al m gha
mb un ra
Cha a BENGAL
G
Kanpur
rG
nd
an
Si ariwa I N D I A
do
k
Poing
CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION
Varanasi
RAJSHAHI
San BIHAR BANGLA
DESH
DA
MO
DA
R
The development in the basin had its advantages and disadvantages. Flooding
became a thing of the past. Many new industries were established. The victims of
this development were the forests and the agricultural operations. As can be seen
from Table 9.1, in one of the primary coal-rich parts of the basin (Dhanbad), the
area under agriculture has come down from 59% in 1925 to just 10% in 1984. The
area under forest cover has decreased from 4.9% in 1925 to 1.25% in 1984.
Significantly, the area under mining has gone up nearly six-fold during the same
period.
Table 9.1: Land Use Pattern in Jharkand Coal Fields (JCF), Dhanbad
The presence of the vast coal mining operations and the proximate availability of
iron ore prompted the setting up of many steel and power plants in the basin area,
which is now home to 6 large thermal power stations, 4 major steel plants, 14 coal
washeries and 3 coke ovens. To illustrate the magnitude of the industrial activity,
it may be mentioned that the region produces 88 million tons of coal annually,
the steel plants have a combined annual production capacity of nearly 7 million
tons, and the 6 coal-based thermal power plants together have a combined capacity
of 3,290 MW.
All these industrial operations draw water from the Damodar and discharge their
untreated effluents into the river.
118 CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION
1971 10,720,485
Source: District Census Book, Government of India, 1971, 1981, 1991. As presented in the
CSME Final Study Report,1998.
[also called Material Flow Analysis (MFA)] provides an overall picture of resource
flows in a given area. Such an understanding of the regional metabolism is
particularly relevant for well defined geographic entities like river basins
(references of MFA studies on river basins and regions in Europe and the USA are
given in the bibliography at the end of the book).
The title of the study was Socio-industrial metabolism of the Damodar Valley
Area. The potential scope of the project was so vast, that to do justice to an area as
large as the Damodar Basin would have taken a few lifetimes. Hence the first task
was to try and set boundaries that were more achievable and such that some
meaningful conclusions could be drawn within the duration of the project, which
was one year.
The study was entrusted to the Centre for Study of Man and Environment (CSME),
under the coordination of Prof. S.P. Mukherjee (Calcutta University) with an
advisory team consisting of Prof. Stefan Anderberg (University of Copenhagen,
Denmark), Dr. Emmanuel Glenck (currently Austrian Space Agency, Vienna),
Prof. Jayanta Bandyopadhyay (Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta) and the
authors. All the data presented in this case study are based on the CSME report,
hereafter referred to as CSME Final Study Report, 1998.
When the advisory team made a preliminary visit to the project area, it was amazed
at the magnitude of the job. Although it was apparent that a study of the region
could be very significant, it was difficult to know where to begin and how to select
the issues that needed to be addressed. It would have been too vast a task to
attempt to track the flow of all materials and resources in the region.
After many debates, the possible aspects that could be the focus of the study were
determined (presented on the next page). It was believed that an investigation
into these aspects could help get a clearer overview of the problems in the area, as
the major resource flows in the region were water and coal. A study of the flow of
these two major resources could have implications in outlining the development
and environment policy for the Damodar Valley.
The findings of the study are presented in the following pages in an abridged
form.
120 CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION
1. The river itselfThe attempt would be to understand the flow of river water in the basin.
To do this may require finding an answer to the following questions:
How much water flows in to the river?
Who are the user groups of the water?
How much water do these users put back into the river after use?
And, what is the quality of the water that is put back into the river?
2. Coal in the region. In this case, the task would be to understand:
How much coal is produced?
How is this produced?
How much is used by different user groups?
How is the coal transported?
How is the coal processed and used?
What are the materials transferred to the environment in these processes?
F I G U R E 9.2
Industry
Rainfall
Domestic Use
The River
Damodar
Agriculture
Mine Drainage
Source: Office of the Damodar Valley Corporation. From the CSME Final Study Report, 1998.
Units: million cubic meters/year
122 CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION
It is estimated that about 75% of the basin is covered with hard rock. Hence the
seepage of water into the ground is relatively low.
The estimates of the volume of water are available from the three catchment
areas of the river, the sum of which gives the total volume in the river.
Agriculture 2,416.00
Total 2,885
Units: million cubic meters/year or MCM
Assumptions: The data for the utilization of river waters in agriculture, power
plants and steel plants are taken from the CSME report. Other industries has been
assumed, as 20% (based on discussions with the officials of the Damodar Valley
Corporation) of the sum of power and steel plants, as no better data were available.
Domestic use has been assumed to be 10 cubic meters per capita per year (based
on the estimates presented in the CSME report). Domestic use also includes
consumption by the small establishments such as the ubiquitous tea-stalls.
As can be seen from Table 9.4, by far the largest use of the water is for agriculture.
Hence, if any assessment has to be made of the industrial metabolism of the
region, the impact of agriculture on the river waters and conversely, the impact of
the river waters (often polluted) on the agricultural operations needs to be examined
thoroughly.
CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION 123
To study the impact of each of the human activities listed earlier, it is necessary to
understand how water is used in each of these operations.
1. The bulk of the industrial activity is upstream of the river and the agricultural operations
are carried out almost uniformly in the entire basin. Much of the agriculture consists of
food crops such as paddy. The river is also a major source of fish, which forms a
predominant part of the diet of the local population.
2. While industrial wastes are discharged into the river, the river water is used in agriculture.
The danger of toxic pollutants, particularly heavy metals, moving up the food chain needs
to be studied in detail.
3. Conversely, the runoffs from agriculture (which are normally ignored in any discussion on
pollution in India), which may include contamination from chemical fertilizers and pesticides,
by themselves, could be a serious threat to the health of the flora and fauna.
4. As can be seen from Figure 9.3, there is a substantial loss of water through seepage. This
seepage could carry pollutants into the aquifers, which are used untreated by the population.
Source: Command Area Development Authority (1993) and Command Area Development
Scheme (1994). From the CSME Final Study Report, 1998.
F I G U R E 9.3
Utilization of Water in Damodar Valley
Agricultural Operations
River water
2,136
Rainfall Groundwater
4,230 280
Evaporation Losses
2,460
DAMODAR VALLEY
AGRICULTURE
Seepage &
Transportation Losses
755
Lead 0.098 69
Mercury 0.0015 10
Phenolic Compounds 0.173 1211
Source: CSME Final Study Report, 1998.
The path of these thousands of tonnes of pollutants through the ecosystem deserves
a thorough investigation.
The figures of the total load of the suspended particulate matter and dissolved
solids other that the pollutants shown in Table 9.6 are likely to be enormous.
However, a reasonable estimate is not immediately possible, since part of the data
is not available.
126 CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION
The transportation of coal has traditionally been through the railway network, as
the coal has to be delivered over thousands of kilometers to different parts of the
vast country. The railway system has been always under pressure and unable to
service the requirements of a rapidly growing demand. As the railways are unable
to fully meet the requirements of industry, trucks are increasingly carrying the
coal. This is a very expensive form of transportation in India. Nevertheless, the
helpless customers are willing to pay the extra price to keep their plants running.
Coal, in the Damodar Valley, was always referred to as the Black Diamond and its
importance in this area can never be underestimated. Coal is a part of every facet
of life in the region. In addition to being the primary fuel, it is the main source of
livelihood for a large part of the population.
The presence of coal can hardly be ignored. Thousands of trucks and railway
wagons are always scurrying around transporting coal. There are high levels of
dust in the areas where coal is mined or handled. As mentioned earlier, the air,
especially in winter, is filled with smoke from the chimneys of factories and the
millions of chulas (crude local stoves), which are lit to cook and to stay warm.
The environmental laws in India have laid down stringent norms for emissions
from the power plants, steel plants and from mining activity. However, it is obvious
that the laws have not been totally successful in keeping the region clean.
To adequately understand the flow of coal in the Damodar Valley, the handling
and use of coal was segregated into the aspects relating to:
Part of the coal produced in the region (about 17% of the 88.97 million tons
produced) is sent to coal washeries nearby. In a typical washery, large quantities
of water are swished through the coal to remove the ash contained in the coal and
improve its properties. The end products of the washing are dispatched to the
consumers, who may typically be steel or power plants. The remainder solid waste
is dumped nearby. No reliable estimate is available of the quantity so dumped,
although it may be stated that the quantity would be very significant. The
wastewater is also likely to carry with it large quantities of coal dust. No data of
the composition of the waste water is available.
extrapolated to the entire production of the region, the quantities of loss to the air,
water and land amount to 1.40 million tonnes, 2.68 million tonnes and 1.26 million
tonnes respectively. In fact, these losses are probably much higher since there are
many storage points.
Hence, it is possible that there could be a total of 2.73 (1.33 + 1.40) million tonnes
of coal dust in the air annually in the process of transportation, storage and
handling. This does not include the nearly similar quantity lost on the land.
If these norms were assumed, the total loss would be 9.97% (6.022 + 3.95) or
8.87 million tonnes, which is more than the total consumption of the power plants
in the area, including the losses in the power plants.
These are enormous quantities, and if any real attempt is to be made to clean the
region, the handling and transportation of coal deserves serious attention.
It is believed that, while the commercial implications of these losses has been
recognized and internalized in the operations, the implications on the environment
have not been given adequate emphasis.
F I G U R E 9.4
Material Balance of Coal (199495)
in Thermal Power Plants of the Damodar Valley
0.26 Air
0.10
6.57 Coal Supply Losses during
Transit Water
0.16
6.31
Air
0.38 0.10
Consumption Losses
Land
due to Rain/Wind 0.19
0.31 during Storage
Water
Land 0.09
Refuse Stone, Shale 5.62
0.31 Coal Mill/Rejects
Waste
2.38 N
9.26
Ash with
Unburnt Carbon O
0.53 1.85 2.31
0.18 1.65
Land Solid Waste
Units
Re-use in Brick
Dumped All figures in
Industries
million tonnes/year
The environment authorities have been very closely monitoring the emissions
from these plants as they are considered major polluters. The plants have installed
high-efficiency systems to minimize the particulate emissions, which include the
latest Electro-Static Precipitators (ESPs). It is reported that the ESPs trap more
than 99% of the fly-ash and other particulate emissions. There are no reports of
any systems to recover sulfur from gaseous emissions, although 65,000 tonnes
could be available for recovery (1% of coal consumed). The process is also being
continuously streamlined to ensure that the combustion is complete and wastes
minimum. All efforts are also being made to minimize the load of carbon monoxide.
There is no quantified data available on the potential for possible recovery of
waste heat from the plants. Such data, which could be obtained through a specific
RFA, would be of great value. The profitable use of waste heat, generated by an
increasing number of power plants, is of particular relevance in hot countries
like India. The demand for process heat and for refrigeration (which can be
generated from waste heat), is growing rapidly in these countries. Selling the
waste heat from thermal power plants could prove a very interesting business
opportunity for power plants (like in the case of the Kalundborg Symbiosis in
Denmark), and for their customers as well, as they would buy heat or cold at a
low price (since it is originally a waste). Bringing this waste heat into profitable
use would result in a more efficient use of coal, allowing also to save a precious
resource like electricity.
The concern is the generation of ash. Currently, the ash generated (along with
unburnt carbon), accounts for nearly 36% of the total consumption of coal. Since
the coal in the Damodar basin has been reported to be of much lower ash content,
this gives an indication that the power plants are probably using lower quality
coal brought in from neighboring regions.
In most cases, a slurry of ash with water is carried to the ash ponds. Effectively,
water is used as a medium of transport to carry away the ash to the ponds. The
ponds themselves have become a source of concern as the leachates could carry a
number of heavy metals to the aquifers. The dust and the land utilization are also
a source of concern2.38 million tonnes of ash are added to the ponds every
year!
It is also interesting to note that of the 6.57 million tonnes supplied to the power
plants, 0.95 million tonnes of coal appear to be wasted (lost in transit and storage).
CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION 133
Market 0.23
Iron Ore 9.67 (BF)
Product Carbon Losses etc.
(Pond Breeze) 0.06
Settleable Fluxes 3.74
Solid (SS) 0.6 Slag1.40
Effluent
100150 cu.m/hr Contents 1.10
1015 mg SS Ash of BF Coke
Sludge
Biological Effluent Cooling Pond Carbon Output
Units Treatment Plant Biological Effluent 0.20
million tonnes/year unless Treatment Plant (BETP)
mentioned otherwise Sludge Dumping Land Filling
Hence the total consumption of coal by this sector could be as much as half the
consumption of all the power plants in the region. Since the quantities are likely
to be significant, an urgent effort is needed to get a better picture of the use by the
domestic sector.
Since the coal is burnt in crude stoves, the combustion efficiency is likely to be
poor, which would result in higher levels of pollution. The significance of this use
on the air quality of the region needs to be investigated.
In summary, the total usage of coal could be presented as in Figure 9.6.
F I G U R E 9.6
Usage of Coal by Different Sectors in
the Damodar Valley
Domestic Sectors
(2.55)
Other Industries Power Plants
(1.00) (6.57)
Steel Plants
(6.67) Units
million tonnes/annum
Since the annual production of coal in the Damodar Valley is 88.97 million tonnes,
it may be assumed that 69.83 million tonnes (2.36 million tonnes in the steel
sector is imported) are transported out of the Damodar region to other parts of the
country.
In relation to this, the storage, transportation and handling losses could be as high
as 8.87 million tonnes annually, which is almost 30% more than the amount of
coal consumed by the power utilities or by the steel plants!
136 CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION
1. It may be an urgent task to study the movement of specific pollutants through the
ecosystem. It is particularly necessary to study the uptake of various heavy metals by the
plants and the movement of these toxins up the various food chains in the region.
2. The groundwater used by the population in the area needs to be monitored regularly. If
high levels of any specific toxin are found, the origins of such toxins should be traced
back to the source. It may be mentioned that recently, high levels of arsenic were found
in the groundwater in metropolitan Kolkata. Regular monitoring of the groundwater will
prevent such incidents.
3. A fresh look needs to be taken at the handling and transportation systems of coal. The
options could include new methods of storage or handling such as filling coal in closed
containers for transportation at the mine, palletizing the coal dust at the mine and moving
coal through slurry pipelines. Although these may require large investments, it could be
the only way to clean the environment. Besides, the savings on the wastage could partly
or fully pay back the investments made.
CASE STUDY OF THE DAMODAR VALLEY REGION 137
These possible implications (and there could be many others) make a strong case
for the need to look beyond pollution issues, and promote a broad resource based
approach in areas like the Damodar Valley Basin. A regional RFA could provide
the basis for a comprehensive policy framework, laying the ground for sound
economic development, efficient use of resources, minimal environmental
impacts, and a better quality of life for the local population.