Dalits Diary - e News Weekly

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.11 issue.38 . 04 / 10 / 2017

Editorial : Judges MAFIA - Accountability of Judges

Now in India , along with criminalization of politics , police and executive

criminalization of Judiciary is also evident. However Judges who take lakhs of rupees
salary & perks from public exchequer are not accountable to public. Judges dont respond
to RTI queries nor reply to legal notices nor the decisions of transfer of judges ,
elevation or non elevation of judges are made public. If a judge has adverse observations
from Intelligence Bureau or any other statutory body which makes him unfit for elevation in
such a circumstance that judge is even unfit to continue in his existing post.

The collegiums of Judges is behaving like a MAFIA in league with powers that be. The
honest judges who dont favor mafia face dismissal , arrest , non elevation , transfer , etc.
Judges MAFIA has time & again sent such subtle message to honest judges. Judges
who have committed crimes but has the blessings of MAFIA get promotions , favorable
postings , enquiries against them will be manipulated to save them.

Few judges although have committed crimes are technically staying as INNOCENTS
by manipulating fair investigation , prosecution against them. This is an appeal to
HONEST few in judiciary to demand accountability of their corrupt colleagues.

Judges , Police Learn Honesty

Life of illegally terminated judge Mr.Gwal is a lesson of honesty for all judges & police.
Inspite of being HONEST in his duties , Mr.Gwal is suffering at the hands of powers that
be & judicial mafia. Mr.Gwal could have choosen the easy , luxurious path of favoring
powers and could have enjoyed luxurious life with his family. He rightly chose the path to
uphold constitution ended up even without money to pay his childrens school fees. Even
apex court didnt come to his rescue. SHAME SHAME . Except for few honest judges &
police , many of them are leading lifestyles beyond the sources of their legal income. Few
of them are successful in manipulating legal process to continue in service , get
promotions despite grave criminal allegations against them. Some judges have even
entered supreme court , what a shame ? They must learn righteousness honesty from
Mr.Gwal.

There are fake lawyers , advocates with uncle judge connections who are leading life
styles beyond the legal sources of their income. These advocates are cheating the public
& court as well making contempt of them. Why not criminal prosecutions against those
guilty lawyers , advocates ?

Above all these type of corrupt people in gowns of judges , advocates & corrupt police
preach others about honesty , integrity and prosecute other criminals while they
themselves are criminals. It is like a PROSTITUTE preaching about virginity , chastity to a
young girl.

Our whole hearted respects to few honest judges , police & advocates in public service.
It is an appeal to them to prosecute their corrupt colleagues. We once again offer our
conditional services to SCI , to apprehend legally prosecutes criminal judges , criminal
police & criminals in public service. Is CJI ready ?

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Yours ,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

PIL JAIL Dipak Mishra Unfit Judge & Others

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & H.E. Honourable President of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor , Indians Diary & Dalits Diary ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER
ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of
low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight
among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons
just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston
Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

In his death note Former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Mr.Kalikho Pul has clearly
alleged involvement of CJI Khehar , Dipak Mishra , President Mukherjee & others in the
crime.

Justice Dipak Mishra has a criminal past of fraud , cheating the authorities to
get land allotment. . He is unfit even to be a munsiff judge let alone CJI. He has
managed the crime cover up well.

He and present CJI Khehar have helped the union government in their unjust
illegal actions like unjust imposition of president rule and change of chief
miniser in few states, cover up of Corporate scams like Birla - Sahara , lake ,
forest , revenue land encroachments by powerful , etc. In turn as a payout
Union government has made them Chief Justice of India and helped the judges in
cover up of their own crimes. Quid Pro Quo.

CJI Khehar & Dipak Mishra have effectively stalled proper investigations into
crimes committed by them. They have even stalled the legal prosecution. All
through Union Government and respective state governments have helped them
inspite of clinching evidences against two judges.

Nowadays judges who don't dance to the tune of corrupt higher judges ,
corrupt ministers , don't get promotions. Even may loose their jobs or land up in
jail for upholding justice.
 If Dipak Mishra is made CJI , it will be roaring business for corrupt mafia.
Innocents , commoners will be sent to jail , may even be hanged while the rich
criminals roams free.

Since 20 years we are appealing to Chief Justice of India concerning public

issues , seeking justice from him. Till date no action instead more injustices
meted out to silence me after appealing to supreme court and authorities. This
itself proves the criminal nexus of judges , police and public sevants.

Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against
innocents , commoners. Even takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal
limits while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search , seizure
without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action
against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues no suo motto action , delayed action
inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3 rd degree
torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery ,
courage of police ?
Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while judging cases of commoners
, take suo motto action where as cases involving rich crooks comes before them
inspite of repeated PILs they dont consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges
make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is
the wisdom of Judges ?

2. Question(s) of Law:

As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before law ? Why no action
against JS Khehar , Dipak Mishra & Pranab Mukherjee ? Are they special ? WHERE IS THE
BRAVERY , COURAGE OF POLICE ? Before big crooks CBI , Police are zeroes.

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of corrupt Judges , CJI J S Khehar , Supreme
Court Judge Dipak Mishra , Former President Mukherjee & Corrupt Public Servants.
4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for :
writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases
to perform their duties.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for :
writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case
to perform their duties.

b. To register FIR against Chief Justice of India JS Khehar, Supreme Court Judge Dipak
Mishra , Former President of India Mukherjee & others and arrest them for legal prosecution
with respect to Orissa Land allotment scam , Arunachal Pradesh Chief minister change over
, death of CM Kalikho Pul, Cover up of Birla Sahara Scam , Reliance Oil Basin Scam ,
Lake & Land Encroachments in bangalore , Karnataka., etc.

c. To constitute an impartial investigation team to investigate the crimes. The team must be
accountable to the public.

d. Till investigation is over , hold the promotion of Dipak Mishra to the post of Chief Justice
of India.

e . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts
and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER
PRAY.

Dated 12th August 2017 . FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

PIL Collegium or Judges Mafia ?

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & H.E. Honourable President of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor , Indians Diary & Dalits Diary ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER
ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Now in India , along with criminalization of politics , police and executive

criminalization of Judiciary is also evident. However Judges who take lakhs of rupees
salary & perks from public exchequer are not accountable to public. Judges dont respond
to RTI queries nor reply to legal notices nor the decisions of transfer of judges ,
elevation or non elevation of judges are made public. If a judge has adverse observations
from Intelligence Bureau or any other statutory body which makes him unfit for elevation in
such a circumstance that judge is even unfit to continue in his existing post.

The collegiums of Judges is behaving like a MAFIA in league with powers that be. The
honest judges who dont favor mafia face dismissal , arrest , non elevation , transfer , etc.
Judges MAFIA has time & again sent such subtle message to honest judges. Judges
who have committed crimes but has the blessings of MAFIA get promotions , favorable
postings , enquiries against them will be manipulated to save them.
 Few judges although have committed crimes are technically staying as INNOCENTS
by manipulating fair investigation , prosecution against them. This is an appeal to
HONEST few in judiciary to demand accountability of their corrupt colleagues.

2. Question(s) of Law:

As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before law ? Why no action
against Judges MAFIA ? Are they special ? WHERE IS THE BRAVERY , COURAGE OF
POLICE ? Before big crooks CBI , Police are zeroes.

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of corrupt Judges & Corrupt Public Servants.

4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for :
writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases
to perform their duties.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for :
writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case
to perform their duties.

b. to make public the Judges collegium decision first to transfer Justice Jayant Patel from
Gujarath High Court to Karnataka High Court and afterwards from Karnataka High Court to
Allahabad High Court.
c. to make public the Judges collegium decision NOT to elevate Uttarakhand chief
Justice K M Joseph , Orissa High Court Judge B P Das , Karnataka High Court Judge
Jayant Patel.

d. to make public collegiums decision against Justice Karnan & Sukma Judge Prabhakar
Gwal.

e. certain judges although facing grave criminal charges , allegations but in favorable
terms with ruling establishment are elevated example Justice Dinakaran , Justice Dipak
Mishra , Mysore Roost Resort SEX scandal fame Judges , etc. What is so special about
those judges which deserves promotion. Also fair investigation , enquiry , prosecution
against such special judges are stalled , buried by higher judges , ruling government ,
why ? make the reasons for stalling investigations , prosecution public . what is so
SPECIAL ? Make that special collegiums decision public.

f. Is It not shameful to collegium judges that they are public servants , taking huge
salaries , perks from public exchequer but unaccountable to public. To make it mandatory
accountability of judges to public , accountability of Judges collegium to public..

g. to make public the list of judges since independence till date who faced allegations ,
actions taken or not taken against them with reasons thereof.

h. To build safeguarding mechanism which reassures HONEST JUDGEs that they will
not be victimized , persecuted by higher judges , judges collegium or ruling government.

i. In many instances relatives of judges are being appointed as judges from bar. To
make public the selection criteria for appointment of judges from bar.

j. In many instances the senior advocates get a patient hearing in courts while fair hearing
is no given to junior lawyers. Sometimes although junior lawters are making logical
argument presiding judge makes harsh comment as though judge himself is more
brilliant , wise in the universe. It is unjust & against law. To make public criteria adopted for
designating lawyers as seniors & allocating time for senior lawyers / junior lawyers.

k. to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts
and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER
PRAY.

Dated 30th September 2017 . FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Gujarath High Court Advocate Letter

https://barandbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/GHCAA-Letter-watermark.pdf

Justice Jayant Patel resignation: K'taka law minister reacts, lawyers to suspend
work

Many have suggested that Justice Patel is paying the price of his ruling in the Ishrat Jahan
case in Gujarat, back in 2011

The sudden resignation of Justice Jayant Patel has triggered strong reactions from state
Law Minister TB Jayachandra and also from the state's lawyers.

The minister said, Justice Patel was one of the most honest and best judges I have seen,
calling the development as unfortunate.

Lawyers in Karnataka are also set to boycott work for one day, Advocate-general
Madhusudan R Naik told The New Indian Express. An emergency meeting is likely to be
held by the state Bar Council.
Justice Patel, who is the senior-most puisne judge had tendered his resignation after he
was transferred to Allahabad High Court.

He was eligible to be the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court as Chief Justice SK
Mukherjee is set to retire on October 9. But the judge refused to speak on his non-elevation
citing institutional discipline.

If he had accepted the transfer, Justice Patel would have retired being the third senior judge
in Allahabad HC.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, he cited that he did not want to move to a new place for
just 10 months.

I did not want to move to a new place for a period of 10 months. This is the reason I
resigned. I have put in 16 years in service, he said.

This is not the first time that Justice Patel has been passed up for a promotion. The senior
judge was the Acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court, prior to his transfer to
Karnataka.

Many have suggested that Justice Patel is paying the price of his ruling in the Ishrat Jahan
case in Gujarat, back in 2011. Justice Patel was part of the division bench that handed over
the investigation into the 2004 killings of Ishrat Jahan, Javed Sheikh and two others, to a
Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT).

LAWYERS COMMUNITY BANGALORE, KARNATAKA

To,

The Honble Chief Justice Of India

Supreme Court of India,

Open Letter to the Supreme Court Collegium regarding the transfer and
supersession of the seniority of Justice Jayant Patel
The decision of the Collegium transferring Justice Jayant Patel to the Allahabad
High Court resulting in his supersession to the post of the Chief Justice of the
Karnataka High Court has shocked the advocates not only in Karnataka, but
across the country. Justice Jayant Patel is known as a fair, impartial and
independent judge. The decision of the collegium to transfer him has once again
brought to the forefront the issues relating to the absolute lack of transparency
and accountability in the functioning of the collegium system.

Several attending circumstances raise further doubts as to the propriety of the

decision of the collegium. Considering the impeccable record and clinical
efficiency of Justice Jayant Patel, becoming the Chief Justice of the Karnataka
High Court was a natural progression in his tenure, which he has now been
deprived of. The timing of the transfer clearly shows that it was intended to ensure
that Justice Jayant Patel would not be made Chief Justice of the Karnataka High
Court. Further, the transfer being evidently unwarranted at this juncture, having
regard to the serious shortage of Judges in the Karnataka High Court, due to more
than 50% of the posts of judges being vacant, also, call for disclosure of reasons
behind his transfer.

This is not the first time that Justice Jayant Patel has been superseded.
Previously, in 2015, when he was the acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High
Court, he was transferred to the Karnataka High Court. We must remember that
the last famous supersession happened during the emergency, when Justice H.R.
Khanna was superseded for his dissenting opinion in the Habeas Corpus case.
The lack of transparency and accountability at that juncture had allowed for such
grave injustice. It is indeed ironic that after Justice Khanna was vindicated on
24.08.2017 by the Supreme Court in the judgment of the Right to Privacy Case,
that the Collegium has taken this decision. The independence of the judiciary is an
essential attribute of Rule of law, and the actions taken against Justice Jayant
Patel raises serious questions regarding the independence of the judiciary and
hence the rule of law itself.

We, the members of the Bangalore Bar are of the opinion that this action against
Justice Jayant Patel is symptomatic of the lack of accountability and transparency
in the judicial system. This affects the independence of the judiciary and erodes
the fundamental values of our Constitution.

Thus, we believe, that in the light of the facts and circumstances narrated above,
the independence of the judiciary is at stake. Hence, we demand that the Apex
Court Collegium make public the reasons for the transfer of Justice Jayant Patel,
the agenda for the meeting in which the decision was taken and the minutes of the
meeting of the Collegium. We also seek that the order of transfer issued to him be
immediately revoked and his resignation not be accepted.

Supreme Court collegium should explain why Justice Jayant Patels transfer was
in public interest

The manner in which the transfer was effected has raised questions about
transparency in judicial appointments.

Justice Jayant Patel of the Karnataka High Court resigned on September 25, after he was
transferred to the Allahabad High Court.

The transfer meant Patel lost the opportunity to become chief justice of the Karnataka High
Court, where he was the second-most senior judge. In the Allahabad High Court, he would
have been relegated to the position of the third-most senior judge. When appointing chief
justices, the Supreme Court collegium usually (but not exclusively), considers a candidates
seniority.

The resignation of Patel, who originally belonged to the Gujarat High Court, has caused a
stir in the judiciary. The Karnataka State Bar Association has asked lawyers to abstain from
work on October 4 to protest the transfer. In Gujarat, lawyers stopped work on Wednesday.

This was Patels second transfer. In 2016, he was moved from Gujarat to Karnataka, where
he has since served as a puisne judge.

The manner in which the transfer was effected has raised serious questions about
transparency in judicial appointments. Appearing in a debate on NDTV Wednesday evening,
senior advocate Dushyant Dave alleged political interference in the decision. He noted that
as acting chief justice of the Gujarat High Court, Patel had ordered the Central Bureau of
Investigation to inquire into the murder of Mumbai teenager Ishrat Jahan by Gujarat police
officers in 2004. They claimed that Jahan and her three companions were conspiring to kill
Narendra Modi, who was then Gujarats chief minister. The investigation ordered by Patel
led to charges being filed against several senior police officers and embarrassed the state
government led by Modi.
These allegations aside, Patels transfer begs an important question: Did the Supreme
Court follow its own observations on transferring judges?

Judicial transfers

Judges are appointed by a a five-member collegium, consisting of the Chief Justice of India
and the four most senior judges of the Supreme Court. The collegium system of judges
appointing their fellow judges developed over time through judgements of the Supreme
Court. The most important of them was the Supreme Court Advocates On Record
Association vs Union of India, 1993. The Constitution created a system in which the
President would appoint judges after consulting with the Chief Justice of India. But the 1993
verdict effectively gave all powers to appoint judges to the judiciary.

It also dealt with their transfers and laid down guidelines on how the process should be
handled. Referring to Article 222(1) of the Constitution, which gives the President the power
to transfer judges, the judgement stated:

There is nothing in the language of Article 222(1) to rule out a second transfer of a once
transferred judge without his consent but ordinarily the same must be avoided unless there
exist pressing circumstances making it unavoidable. Ordinarily a transfer effected in public
interest may not be punitive but all the same the Chief Justice of India must take great care
to ensure that in the guise of public interest the judge is not being penalised.

Two things stand out in this observation when applied to Patels case. One, he was being
transferred for a second time. Two, it is clear from Patels resignation that the decision did
not have his consent.

Although the consent of the judge being transferred is not strictly necessary, the 1993
judgment makes it clear that consent should be taken unless there exist pressing
circumstances making it unavoidable. In addition, the circumstances must be in public
interest.

Here lies the problem. The collegiums decisions are not made public, which means there is
no public scrutiny of the circumstances leading to a decision. Also, the Supreme Court has
made it clear that the collegium need not justify its decisions. This is why allegations such
as Daves are impossible to verify.

Further, transfers are not justiciable, which means that a judge who is transferred cannot
challenge the order in the Supreme Court except if the transfer was made without the
collegiums approval an impossible prospect as the President, following the 1993 order,
does not have the power to appoint or transfer judges without the concurrence of the Chief
Justice of India. The transfer has to be initiated by the collegium.

This touches upon the most crucial aspect of Patels transfer: what were the pressing
circumstances and public interest that necessitated his move to the Allahabad High
Court? The answer to this question may never be known given the opacity of the collegium.

One thing, though, is clear from reactions to Patels transfer by lawyers in Gujarat and
Karnataka: he has a reputation of being an upright and efficient judge. Unlike, say, former
Karnataka High Court judge PD Dinakaran, who was moved out to Sikkim in 2010 following
corruption allegations, Patel apparently had no serious complaints against him.

Lawyers protest

This is the context in which lawyers groups are vociferously protesting Patels transfer. A
resolution passed by the Karnataka State Bar Council on Tuesday stated:

That the entire legal fraternity is anguished and is greatly disturbed by the shaking of
faith/confidence in the collegium system; which has meted out such treatment to the Honble
Mr. Justice Jayant Patel, who apparently, has satisfactorily discharged his duties and
functions as a Judge.

Members of the Bar perceive that, apparently decision makers in judiciary and executive
have overlooked the aspirations and spirit of the National Judicial Appointments
Commission verdict in achieving transparency by the actions reflected in recent events, like
proposed transfer of Honble Mr. Justice Jayant Patel on the eve of incumbent Chief Justice
of Karnataka retiring and need to appoint another in the vacancy accruing.

In a 2015 judgement rejecting the proposed National Judicial Appointments Commission,

the Supreme Court recommended improving the transparency of the collegium system. But
not much has happened on that front. The Centre and the Supreme Court are locked in a
battle over the formulation of a new memorandum of procedure for judicial appointments,
with the court objecting to certain clauses in the draft that give the Centre a greater say in
the process.

Meanwhile, the Bar Council of India has issued a show cause notice to Dave for his
allegations against Chief Justice of India Deepak Misra and the collegium. The Supreme
Court Bar Association has expressed concern over the manner of Patels transfer, saying its
executive committee will meet on October 3 to discuss the matter.
What I said on NDTV is the truth, Dushyant Dave responds

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave has given an initial response to the news about Bar
Council of India (BCI) issuing a show cause notice against him for his remarks against CJI
Dipak Misra.

Speaking to Bar & Bench, Dave stood by his remarks on air stating that what he said on
NDTV is the truth.

I havent still got the notice and not read it . But what I said on NDTV last night is the truth.

He further said that it is a matter of grave concern that the conduct of judges go unchecked
and allegations against CJI Misra were very serious.

It is a matter of concern for all in legal system and nation that such conduct of Judges go
unchecked. In fact BCI should have opposed Justice Dipak Misras appointment to the
highest judicial office to which only the best and non-controversial person can be appointed.
The allegations against him were serious and those holding Constitutional offices should
have been conscious and not appointed him.

Dave said that he has nothing personal against CJI Dipak Misra but the allegations against
him should be investigated.

These allegations are not even being investigated but are suppressed from the Nation. I
have nothing personal against him but it worries me as a citizen and a lawyer that with such
background, the Executive is bound to exploit the situation especially when the SC today
has to deal with highly political matters of far reaching consequence.

Dave also condemned the Bar Council of India calling it a body which has not held elections
for years under some pretext.

BCI, by doing this gives an opportunity to bring on fore what should have been debated by
Nation earlier. Advocates Act gives no such power to BCI, a body which has not held
elections for years under some pretext and Mr. Mishra continues to occupy the position as
Chairman unduly. I will happily contest this notice to prove that I was right and BCI is
wrong.

Public Prosecutor Appointment Scam

http://starofmysore.com/assistant-public-prosecutors-appointment-scam-unearthed/ ,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAEBJsp_Zsg ,

Four Arrested in Delhi Police Recruitment Scam

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/four-arrested-in-delhi-police-
recruitment-scam-2998152/ ,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyapam_scam ,

KPSC , Scam

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2362317/CID-probe-exposes-jobs-
marriage-scam-KPSC.html ,

http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in/articles/kpsc-recruitment-scam-cid-report-confirms-
malpractice ,

Judge Selection Illegal

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3300929/Did-judges-children-
special-treatment-Supreme-Court-examine-answer-sheets-Delhi-judicial-exam-2014-
favouritism-complaints.html ,

http://www.timesnow.tv/india/video/sc-judge-rips-into-cji-headed-collegium-shuns-selection-
meetings/48804 ,

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/Discrepancies-in-magistrate-test-evaluation-
HC-asks-for-registrys-views/articleshow/46470410.cms ,

Top police official in Kerala allegedly caught red-handed while copying in LL.M.
exam
http://www.livelaw.in/top-police-official-in-kerala-allegedly-caught-red-handed-while-copying-
in-ll-m-exam/ ,

Judges Suspended For Mass Copying

http://news.fullhyderabad.com/hyderabad-news/five-judges-suspended-for-mass-copying-
1434.html ,

JAIL Chief Justice Dipak Mishra

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/dipak-mishra-unfit-judge

Mishra Threatens Complainant

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/mishra-threatens-petitioner

Notice To Chief Justice of India

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/notice-to-chief-justice ,

Judicial Tyranny

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/judicial-tyranny ,

Judges SEX crimes

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-sex-crimes

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

50% of higher judiciary corrupt, says ex-SC judge Markandey Katju

http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-
markandey-katju/story-Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html

Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-
minister/articleshow/6568723.cms

In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by SC judges, Congress

http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-
congress-news-national-rcruamjjfdhhc.html ,

Calcutta HC Justice Karnan calls judiciary corrupt, brings up old allegations against HC
judges

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/calcutta-hc-justice-karnan-calls-judiciary-corrupt-
brings-up-old-allegations-against-hc-judges/story-k0WRYaBWRPYaUI6HgzPDHP.html

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

Cropping Up Of SC Judges Name During Inquiry Is No Reason To Stall Probe

Against Orissa HC Judge, CJAR Writes To In-House Committee Chairman

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/cropping-sc-judges-name-inquiry-no-reason-stall-probe-

orissa-hc-judge-cjar-writes-house-committee-chairman/

Intellectual Dishonesty Is The Biggest Challenge To The Independence Of Judiciary:

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/intellectual-dishonesty-biggest-challenge-independence-

judiciary-senior-advocate-dushyant-dave-video / ,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiqRt9YsYhQ&t=825s ,

Why The kith And Kin Of Judges Being Mostly Considered For Appointments? Asks

SCBA President

http://www.livelaw.in/kith-kin-judges-mostly-considered-appointments-asks-scba-president-

judges-child-calibre-heshe-can-become-judge-cji/ ,

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761, HUDCO FIRST

STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,
MYSURU 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA

Cell : 91 8970318202

Home page :
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/

https://in.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dalitsdiary/info

https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/dalits--diary
https://dalitsdiary.blogspot.in/

https://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/

http://naghrw.tripod.com/dalitsdiary/

http://thecitizens.torpress2sarn7xw.onion/

Contact : Naag@protonmail.com , Naag@dalitonline.in ,

Secure Mail : Naag@torbox3uiot6wchz.onion ,