Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Please write out answers to the following problems and hand them in, along with by a standard
Cover Sheet, at the reception desk of the Alan Turing Building.
This same progression is sketched2 in greater detail in in Figure 1 and both accounts prompt the
question: What is happening during the long, asymptomatic phase?
ELISA + III 3d
Western blot +/- IV 6d
106 V 70 d
Western blot + (p31-)
VI open-ended
105
Western blot + (p31+)
104
103
101
10 20 30 40 50 100
Days following HIV-1 transmission
Figure 1: The stages of early HIV infection as definedin terms of standard diagnostic testsby
Eberhard Fiebig and his collaborators. The solid curve shows a measure of the concentration of
circulating virus that rises to a sharp peak in the first weeks after infection, then falls back to a
steady level that persists throughout the long intermediate phase of the disease, Fiebig stage VI.
1 Ellner and Guckenheimer (2006), Dynamic Models in Biology, Princeton University Press.
2 The figure is derived from one in Keele et al. (2008), Identification and characterisation of transmitted and
early founder virus envelopes in primary HIV-1 infection, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105(21):75527557. DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0802203105. The Fiebig stages were defined in Fiebig et al. (2003), Dynamics of HIV viremia and
antibody seroconversion in plasma donors: implications for diagnosis and staging of primary HIV infection, AIDS,
17(13):18711879.
The advent of effective anti-HIV drugs in the mid-1990s, in combination with mathematical
modelling, produced a surprising answer to this question. The virus is reproducing and evolving
at a tremendous rateso fast that the virologist John Coffin has estimated3 that each and every
single-point mutation (in HIV) occurs between 104 and 105 times per day in an infected individual.
The same models, some of which we will study, helped motivate the multi-drug therapies that are
now the standard treatments for HIV.
Mathematical models
All the models discussed below concern HIV infection within a single patient and are treated in
much greater detail in a review article by Alan Perelson and Patrick Nelson4 . The simplest one
involves three populations: target cells T , productively infected cells I (after infection, but before
death, these cells produce virus) and virions (virus particles) V . These evolve according to the
ODEs
dT T
= s + rT T 1 kV T dT T
dt K
dI
= kV T dI I
dt
dV
= rV I cV. (1)
dt
All the parameters are positive real numbers and have the following interpretations:
s is the rate at which new target cells are created from other cells within the body;
rT and K are the parameters of a logistic growth term describing proliferation of target cells;
k is the rate parameter of a mass-action term describing the process of infection;
dT and dI are death rates for respectively, target cells and infected cells;
rV is the rate of virus production by infected cells;
c is the rate at which viruses are cleared from the blood stream.
DOI: 10.1137/S0036144598335107
A second family of drugs, the protease inhibitors (PI), act more subtly: they cause infected
cells to produce malformed viruses that cannot go on to infect further targets. To model the action
of these drugs we need to introduce a second viral population N , the non-infectious virions. The
system (1) then becomes
dT T
= s + rT T 1 dT T kV T
dt K
dI
= kV T dI I
dt
dV
= (1 P )rV I cV
dt
dN
= P rV I cN (3)
dt
where 0 < P 1 is, as above, a measure of the drugs effectiveness.
(1) (Dimensionless form) Show that by a suitable change of variables one can reduce the
system (1) to the form
x = + x (1 x) xv 1 x
y = xv 2 y
v = y 3 v. (4)
where the dots on the left hand side indicate differentiation with respect to the dimensionless time
variable . Your answer should include expressions for , and the j in terms of the parameters
of (1).
(2) (Two important equilibria) Find equilibria of (4) that correspond to the following condi-
tions.
(a) A person who has never been exposed to HIV and so has no virus and no infected cells.
(b) An untreated patient in the long asymptomatic phase of the disease, Fiebig Stage VI, who has
constant, nonzero levels of T , I and V . Ill refer to this untreated equilibrium as (x0 , y0 , v0 ).
(3) (RTI therapy) Now consider what happens when a patient begins drug treatment.
(a) Explain how treatment with a reverse transcriptase inhibitor modifies the model (4).
(b) The ODEs describing treatment with RTIs have an equilibrium with x > 0 and y = v = 0.
Analyse the stability of this equilibrium for all values of R .
(4) (Multi-drug therapy) Finally, consider treatment with both a protease inhibitor and a
reverse transcriptase inhibitor.
(a) Write down the analogue of the system (3) for treatment with both types of drug and show
that it can be reduced to
x = + x (1 x) xv 1 x
y = (1 R )xv 2 y
v = (1 P )y 3 v
n = P y 3 n (5)
(b) The system (5) has an equilibrium with x = x? > 0 and y = v = n = 0. Show that it is
stable provided
x0
(1 R )(1 P ) < ,
x?
where x0 is as in Problem 2(b) above.
(c) Given that Fiebig stage VI patients typically have x0 /x? 0.2, determine which combinations
of drug effectiveness (R , P ) lead to successful therapy.