Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press and American Historical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The American Historical Review.
http://www.jstor.org
ROBERT M. BERDAHL
An earlier versionof this paper was presentedat the annual meetingof the Pacific Coast Branch
of the American Historical Association at Portland, Oregon, on September 5, 1970. I would
like to express my thanks to ProfessorsOtto Pflanze and Val R. Lorwin, who subsequently
read the paper and made helpful suggestions.A grant fromthe American Philosophical Society
made possible some of the work reflectedin this paper.
1 Friedrich Meinecke, Weltbiirgertumund Nationalstaat (Munich, 1908) (the book appeared
at the end of 1907, but the publication date is always given as 1908). My citations are from
the English translation,Cosmopolitanismand the National State, tr. Robert B. Kimber (Prince-
ton, 1970),which is based on the seventhedition (1927).
65
From History to Sociology,tr. Hayden V. White (Detroit, 1959), 86-i18; W. Stark,introd. to his
edition of Friedrich Meinecke, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d'Etat and Its Place in
Modern History,tr.Douglas Scott (New York, 1965),xxi-xxvi.
3 Meinecke,Cosmopolitanismand the National State, 10, 12.
4 Meinecke did not define the nation in racial terms; however, when he wrote "A natural
core based on blood relationshipmust be presentin a nation," he acknowledgedthe importance
of the ethnic definitionof the nation. Ibid., 9.
5 Ibid., i8, 205.
6 Ibid., 196.
11 See Leonard W. Doob, Patriotism and Nationalism: Their Psychological Foundations (New
Haven, 1964), 4-9; Carlton J. H. Hayes, Essays on Nationalism (New York, 1926), i; and Rupert
Emerson, From Empire to Nation: The Rise to Self-Assertionof Asian and African Peoples
(Cambridge, Mass., 1960), 102. One of the most significantdiscussionsin this regard is David M.
Potter, "The Historian's Use of Nationalism and Vice Versa," AHR, 67 (1961-62): 924-50. Potter
argues that historianshave only paid lip service to the "communityof interest"as a source of
nationalism. "The point is . . . that nationalism rests on two psychological bases instead of
one: the feelingof common culture and the feelingof common interests"(p. 937).
12 For the varietiesof nationalism that developed, see Walter
Simon, "Variations in Nationalism
during the Great ReformPeriod in Prussia,"AHR, 59 (1953-54): 305-21.
13 This phrase was used to describe nationalism by the Prussian
Conservativesin the program
of their organization,the Volksverein,of September i86i. For a copy of the program,see Ludolf
Parisius, Deutschlands politische Parteien und das MinisteriumBismarcks(Berlin, 1878), 42.
121-98; Artur Sommer, "Ueber Inhalt, Rahmen, und Sinn Aelterer Stufentheorien,"in Edgar
Salin, ed., Synopsis: Festgabe fur Alfred Weber (Heidelberg, n.d.), 535-65; Albert Miissigang,
Die soziale Frage in der historischenSchule der deutschen National6konomie (Tubingen, 1968),
8i-i17. Both Hildebrand and Knies were active in the nationalist cause. Hildebrand's political
beliefs cost him his teaching post at Marburg in 1846; he served in the FrankfurtAssemblyin
1848, then fled to Switzerland,where he remained until i86i. Knies, too, went into exile in
Switzerlandafter 1848.
28 Solomon Bloom, The World of Nations: A Study of the National Implications in the Work
Samtliche Werke und Schriftenmit Ausnahme des "Kapital," ed. D. Ryazanov (Moscow, 1927),
5: 445-46. I have used the translationfrom"The German Ideology" found in Bloom, World of
Nations, 139.
30 Bloom, World of Nations, 140-5o; George Lichtheim, Marxism: An Historical and Critical
that "nationalism is normally associated with deep-running social fermentand change which
disrupt the older order of society and bring about a rise in social consequence and awareness
of ever-wideningsegmentsand classes of people at large." "Nationalism and Political Develop-
ment," 19-20.
32 Namier, "Nationality and Liberty,"37. Namier points out that in France pays is still used
for the various provincesand that in eighteenth-century England "country"was frequentlyused
for "county."
33 See especially Reinhard Bendix, Nation-Building and Citizenship (New York, 1964), 40-48.
34 Wolfram Fischer uses three concepts to describe this social disintegration.The firsthe
calls "decorporization,"which refersto the breaking up of the corporate or stdndischstructure
of society.The second, "disproportionization,"refersto the changing proportionsbetween these
corporate groups, i.e., the numerical growth of the lower strata. The third he defines as "de-
moralization,"which results from"the loss of identitybetween the objective societal order and
the subjective will of the individual." "Social Tensions at Early Stages of Industrialization,"
ComparativeStudies in Societyand History,9 (1966): 76-77.
35 Silvert,introd. to Expectant Peoples, 26. In another interesting
study,The Passing of Tradi-
tional Society: Modernizing the Middle East (Glencoe, 1958), Daniel Lerner makes the following
observation: "Empathy is . . . the inner mechanism which enables newly mobile persons to
operate efficiently in a changing world. Empathy, to simplifythe matter,is the capacity to see
oneself in the other fellow's situation. This is an indispensable skill for people moving out of
traditional settings. . . . High empathic capacity is the predominant personal style only in
modern society,which is distinctivelyindustrial, urban, literate, and participant. Traditional
society is nonparticipant-it deploys people by kinship into communities isolated from each
other and froma center . . . it develops few needs requiring economic interdependence;lacking
the bonds of interdependence,people's horizons are limited by locale and their decisions in-
volve only other known people in known situations.Hence there is no need for a transpersonal
common doctrine formulatedin termsof shared secondarysymbols-a national 'ideology' which
enables persons unknown to each other to engage in political controversyor to achieve 'con-
sensus' by comparingtheiropinions" (pp. 49-50).
36 David Apter, The Politics of Modernization(Chicago, 1965),314.
49 Ludwig Borne, Gesammelte Schriften(Milwaukee, 1858), 5: 31-32. I have used the transla-
tion as it appears in Koppel S. Pinson, Modern Germany (New York, 1966), 67-68. The rela-
tionship of German Jews to the nationalist movement would provide an excellent case study
for the psychologicalroots of nationalism. For a description of Jews seeking assimilation, see
Toni Oelsner, "Three JewishFamilies in Modern Germany:A Study in the Process of Emancipa-
tion," JewishSocial Studies,4 (1942): 241-68, 349-98.
50 Werner Conze and Dieter Groh, Die Arbeiterbewegung in der Nationalen Bewegung
(Stuttgart,1966), 13-40.
51 Dietrich Eichholtz,Junkerund Bourgeoisie vor I848 in der preussischenEisenbahngeschichte
(East Berlin, 1962), 1-12, 33-36.
52 Quoted in ibid., 7-8.