Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region IV-A CALABARZON DIVISION OF QUEZON

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM ( IPCRF )

Name of Employee: JAYSON A. CELSO Name of Rater: Cynthia M. Marquez


Position: Teacher I Position: Public Schools District Supervisor
Rating Period: June-March Date of Review: March 2017
Name of School: Butanguiad Elementary School Bureau/ Center/Service/Division Division office/ PSDS Office
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINES Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATINGS SCORE
Per (Quantity, Efficiency, Timeliness RESULT
KRAs
5- Demonstrated five teaching
Basic Teaching- 1. Perform at least 5 during the year
Education Learning demonstration teaching
Services Process for the whole year and Year round 20% 4 - Demonstrated four teaching
achieves high during the year
proficiency level in all
learning areas 3 - Demonstrated three teaching 2 .20 .0.4
during the year

2 - Demonstrated two teaching


during the year

1 - Demonstrated one teaching


during year
5 - Prepared 7 lesson plans and
2. Prepares lesson plans daily logs of activities in all
and daily logs of assigned subject areas
activities in all assigned 10% including appropriate, and 4 .10 0.4
subject areas including adequate and updated
appropriate, and instructional materials
adequate and updated
instructional materials 4- Prepared 6 lesson plans and
daily logs of activities in all
assigned subject areas including
appropriate, and adequate and
updated instructional materials
3- Prepared 5 lesson plans and
daily logs of activities in all
assigned subject areas including
appropriate, and adequate and
updated instructional materials
2 - Prepared 4 lesson plans and
daily logs of activities in all
assigned subject areas including
appropriate, and adequate and
updated instructional materials
1 - Prepared 3 lesson plans and
daily logs of activities in all
assigned subject areas
including appropriate, and
adequate and updated
instructional materials

3. Develops
localized/indigenized learning 5- Developed five
materials in all learning areas. 10% localized/indigenize learning
materials in all learning areas.
4- Developed four
localized/indigenized learning
materials in all learning areas.
3- Developed three
localized/indigenized learning 4 .10 0.4
materials in all learning areas.
2- Developed two
localized/indigenized learning
materials in all learning areas.
1-Developed one
localized/indigenized learning
materials in all learning areas.
1.2
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINES Weight (Quantity, Efficiency, Timeliness ACTUAL RATINGS SCORE
Per KRAs RESULT
.
1 .Monitor pupils 5 5- Monitored pupils progress
Basic Pupils progress/performance in all 6 Monthly
Education outcomes learning areas as indicated in 7
Services the implementation of K TO 12 Year round 10% 8 4- Monitored pupils progress
curriculum. 9 by Quarterly
10
11 3- Monitored pupils progress by
12 semester 5 .10 0.5

2- Monitored pupils progress


once a year

1- Never Monitored pupils


progress
2. Attain at least 85% 5% 5 - Attained at least 80 85 %
numerates pupils numerate pupils.

4 - Attained at least 70 75 %
numerate pupils

3 - Attained at least 60 65 %
numerate pupils 4 .05 0.2

2 - Attained at least 50 55 %
numerate pupils

1 - Attained at least 40 45 %
numerate pupils
3. Increase pupil's participation 5 - Participated 5 school/district
in all school activities. activities

4 - participated 4 school /district


5% activities

3 Participated 3 school /district 5 .05 .25


activities

2 - Participated 2 school/ district


activities

1 - Participated 1 school /district


activities

TOTAL 0.95
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINES Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATINGS SCORE
Per KRAs (Quantity, Efficiency, Timeliness RESULT
Basic Community 1. Conduct home visitation 5- Conducted 5 home visitation during
Education Involvement with the identified pupils at the year
Services risks.
4 - Conducted 4 hours home visitation
5%
3- Conducted 3 home visitation during
Year Round the year 3 .05 .15

2 - Conducted 2 home visitation


during the year.

1 - Conducted 1 home visitation


2. Initiate program/project 5- Initiated 3 program/project with
with external funding within external funding within the target
the target date. date
10%
4- Initiated 2 program/project with
external funding within the target
date
3 .10 0.3
3- Initiated 1 program/project with
external funding within the target date

2- Initiated partially program/project


with external funding within the
target date

1- Never initiated program/project with


external funding within the target
date.
3. Participate at least 5
community activities within a 5% 5- Participated at least 5 community
year. activities within a year

4- Participated at least 4 community


activities within a year.

3- Participated at least 3 community 4 .05 0.2


activities within a year.

2- Participated at least 2 community


activities within a year
1- Never Participated any community
activities within a year
TOTAL 0.65

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINES Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATINGS SCORE
Per KRAs (Quantity, Efficiency, Timeliness RESULT
1. Attend LAC sessions &
Basic Professional other capacity building 5- Attended 100% LAC session &
Education Growth and program/seminars for Year Round 10% other capacity building
Services Development teachers. program/seminars for teachers.
5 .10 0.5
4- Attended 90% - 95% LAC
session & other capacity
building program/seminars for
teachers.
3- Attended 80% - 85% LAC
session & other capacity
building program/seminars for
teachers.

2- Attended 70% - 75% LAC


session & other capacity
building program/seminars for
teachers.

1- Attended 60% - 65% LAC


session & other capacity
building program/seminars for
teachers

5- Engaged in creation of
2Engage in creation of Year- SIP/AIP/CIP within the target
SIP/AIP/CIP within the target Round 5% date along SBM
date along SBM
4- Engage in creation of
SIP/AIP/CIP within the quarter
target date along SBM

3- Engaged in creation of
SIP/AIP/CIP within the semester 4 .05 0.2
target date along SBM

2 --Engaged in creation of
SIP/AIP/CIP a year behind
with a target date along SBM

1 - Never engaged in creation of


SIP/AIP/CIP within the target
date along SBM
3. Conduct action research, 5- Conducted an action research,
CIP& other interventions. Year-Round 5% CIP& other interventions
approved and utilized by the
district.

4- Conducted an action research,


CIP& other interventions but
yet approved and utilized by the
district./schools

3- Conducted action research, 4 .05 0.2


CIP& other interventions from
chapter 1 - 3 only.

2- Conducted action research,


CIP& other interventions from
Chapter 1- 2 only.

1-Conducted an action research,


CIP& other interventions from a
Title

0.9
3.70 V.S
OVER ALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

LUDYVIL V. SANIEL JAYSON A. CELSO CYNTHIA M. MARQUEZ


Teacher In-charge Teacher I Public Schools District Supervisor
Rater Approving Authority

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen