Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction:
Stratsim Strategic marketing simulation was designed to make learning more pleasurable for
students while actually enabling them to learn the concepts better and faster. Some of the
aims of these simulation are explained below;
Enable us to think holistically: This simulation has helped was designed to help students
think holistically, in other words how management functions work together, i.e R&D,
finance, marketing, production to mention but a few.
Long termism: Business are in it for the long haul, and achieving a sustainable profit growth
was our main business objective.
Stay ahead of the perk: by giving us the opportunity to innovate, giving us industry news we
were able to use these external environment information, about competitors, costs of
production, GDP, sales forecast to innovate and stay ahead of the perk.
Being able to make tough decisions: The simulation had special decisions that would make
our strategies seem useless, being able to adjust under such circumstances which actually
happen in the real life scenarios is captured quite well in this simulation as well.
It was easier for us to target these segments concurrently because they had
somewhat similar needs and this meant that technological developments in
ISSQ features would be focused on the hot buttons of these segments and
they were similar, i.e. performance and styling were hot buttons for the 3T
microsegment, high income consumer segment and Enterprisers.
One mutual characteristic that these segments had that was of value to us was
that they would spend large amounts of their disposable income on vehicles
that is for the singles consumer segment, while the high income and
enterprisers were willing to pay a premium price for extra features and looked
at their vehicle as a symbol of status. Armed with such information we set out
to understand these segments better so we performed a study using the
market research tools available on the 3s microsegment which proved that the
top selling units in this microsegment were a poor fit.
- Keep minor upgrading Truck and Family cars and also charge premium price
- Increase manufacturing capacity by 200,000.
It is worth noting that Team E also launched the same vehicle class, Luxury and
we were watching them carefully, we were very careful in our pricing because
we knew that even if we were offering superior ISSQ attributes and customer
service as seen from firm preference there was a limit to how much even the
high income segment would pay. To cut the story short the Luxury car of firm E
was charged 20,000 dollars more than ours with less ISSQ features, and only
sold a miserable 4,000 units.
- Increase overall firm ISSQ
Some of the attributes of majority of our units were upgraded to the firm
maximum and therefore this required us increase firm overall attributes in
order to continue upgrading vehicle units in the following periods.
- Charge highly for Truck due to less Truck competitors in the market (from
regulation of safety) to gain higher margin per unit
Due to the regulation of safety, the vehicles that had safety levels lower than 4
could not be sold in the market, so that meant we had less competitors. All of
the firms were affected by this except for firm D with Dusty, so we took the
risk and increased our MSRP by $5000 and limited the number of vehicles
produced, we made this decision with the help of the law of demand and
supply, this strategy paid off, our sales increased and we captured market
share in terms of revenue, we were also market unit market leaders in all the
segments that preferred the Truck vehicle class as their unit except for 1T
where Dusty took the lead. This was because the 1T microsegment was price
sensitive and Dusty charged a lower price.
- Decrease number of Sport cars manufacturing since product life cycle of
Sport cars in the Maturity stage
We found out that now our sport car sold less in last year and analysis show
that it already in maturity stage so we reduce the number of production
because we also have inventories left like never before.
The major issue we faced with Asporto was because we had not upgraded it
from the time it was launched, e concentrated on upgrading the other units
and developing new concepts because we though that being the only Sports
car in the segment we would continue to sell it as it was, we were wrong this
vehicle needed to be upgraded as Dusty and Ace were very high in ISSQ
attributes and enjoyed secondary preference in the 4s and 3s microsegments.
- We therefore Minor upgraded the Truck, Family, and Sport car vehicle
classes.
- Increased manufacturing capacity for 300,000.
The reason we did not increase price for truck was because. We were short on
one target that we set out to achieve. That is unit market leadership. So we
decided not to increase prices but make upgrade to the units and therefore
capture a bigger unit sales market share. Which we did, we number one in
both Unit sales and sales revenue share.
In addition to the learning objectives in the introduction section, we are proud to mention
that we also learnt the following:
We learnt how important it is for marketing managers to put into consideration the other
functions of the organization when making marketing strategy decisions. Poor financing
decisions were the Achilles heals of most of our competitors. We also had to make
manufacturing decisions as well.
Research and development were valuable tools, concept testing and focus groups helped us
to determine the prices and ISSQ attributes that would meet expectations of our customers.
The importance of focusing one of the two strategies i.e. differentiation or cost leadership
was brought to light during the simulation., the firms like E who did not have a proper
strategy kept jumping from segment to segment and it cost them, some firms like firm C
tried to capture share in a high value consumer segment yet they started by targeting value
seekers this causes confusion amongst customers.
The biggest segments tend to have many competitors as everyone seeks to take a bite off
the share of the pie but this is not necessarily the best segment to target especially if your
resources are limited. Targeting smaller consumer segments and further targeting
microsegment was a more viable option.
Product Based on what consumers are likely to pay (focus groups in concept and
market test)
Price Charging a premium price after putting dealer discounts into consideration
Place We are spending quite a lot on training and support of distributors
Promotion Advertising themes are target to the right audience, highest expenditure in
the industry from period
Corporate advertising is also top on our agenda for every season.