Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Going back to the issue, Is being a gay, lesbian, and the likes caused by hereditary or genetic
influences? This is undeniably a hugely perplexing topic. We, ordinary people who obliviously inhabit
the world, consider these homosexual individuals as beings who have freely chosen to be the kind of
people whom they are. We have grown to acknowledge the fact supposed to be opinion - that
causes of their homosexuality might root from their environment and other external factors.
However, some curious, scrutinizing people such as scientists and researchers refuse to be
acquiescent. It is indeed palpable that homosexuality is making substantial growth in our societies. It
is a common trait, found in up to 10% of the worlds population. It seems to run in different
generations of families, quite suggesting that it may be hereditary, at least in part. But if it is
hereditary, how come it defies the very reason why traits are passed on from generation to
generation? According to Laura Blue of TIME, How could something that hinders childbearing be
passed down so frequently from parents to children? It is completely vexing, but researchers have
tried to come up with biological and mathematical models that might be able to diminish confusions
regarding the roots and causes of homosexuality.
Based on the articles and research papers that we have read regarding the issue, we now
firmly stand by the belief that homosexuality; the state of being gay, lesbian or bisexual; is not
caused by hereditary or genetic influences. We have not come to this stance or claim simply because
we think and believe that the cause of homosexuality, in its entirety, only has something to do with
the environment that you grow up in, or the worldly forces that trigger change within your
preferences. Instead, it has something to do with your composition as a human being, inherent and
occurred when you were still an embryo. As what Sergey Gavrilets of the National Institute for
Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) has explained: Its not genetics. Its not DNA. Its
not pieces of DNA. Its epigenetics. The hypothesis we put forward is based on epigenetic marks.
Though these theories are yet to be given biological and mathematical models, there is indeed
a big probability that this might be correct, given the existing data in our world. One evidence is the
experiment conducted by UCLA molecular biologist, Tuck C. Ngun. He studied the genetic material of
47 pairs of identical male twins wherein 37 pairs had one twin gay and the other straight, and 10
pairs wherein both were gay. Their DNA were studied, and it was found out that the gay men all had
epi-marks within their DNA while those who were straight had none. These epi-marks may indicate
something else but this can be greatly considered as essential data already.
We personally believe that this might be plausible. Myriad individuals across the world have
become homosexual gay, lesbian, etc. Many families also have several homosexuals within them,
quite suggesting a biological association to the said phenomenon. We acknowledge the fact that it
might just be caused by environmental forces, but considering the hasty increase in their number,
theres got to be something else involved which is inherent to the individual.
We often hear gays or lesbians say that they cannot contain what they truly feel inside in their
entire lifetime; theyve got to express it and break it out of their hiding zones, otherwise theyd feel
completely lost. Genetics? We believe not, for many researchers and scientists in the past years have
already tried to find the gay gene yet they have been unsuccessful. If there truly existed one, they
wouldve been able to track it down, given their intelligences and technology. But, since to this date,
they still havent found it, maybe it doesnt really exist. Therefore, homosexuality is not caused by
hereditary or genetic influences.
Epigenetics may or may not be the answer. We never really know the entire truth yet behind
homosexuality since no one has been able to completely fathom its mystery. But whatever it is;
whether humanity finds a scientific explanation to it or not, what should matter most is our sense of
respect to these individuals. Anyway, they do not need scientific facts in order to justify themselves
to everyone. They are human beings just like every single one of us inhabiting this world, and they
equally are worthy of honor and recognition.
References:
The Quarterly Review of Biology by William Rice, Urban Friberg & Sergey Gavrilets