Sie sind auf Seite 1von 89

Eternality of Punishment: A Theological Controversy within the Amsterdam Rabbinate in

the Thirties of the Seventeenth Century


Author(s): Alexander Altmann
Source: Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, Vol. 40 (1972), pp. 1-
88
Published by: American Academy for Jewish Research
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3622418
Accessed: 18-07-2017 07:22 UTC

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms

American Academy for Jewish Research is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT:
A THEOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY
WITHIN THE AMSTERDAM RABBINATE
IN THE THIRTIES OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY*

By ALEXANDER ALTMANN

Isaac Aboab de Fonseca (1605-1693), the distinguished


of Amsterdam Jewry,1 has long been known to be the a
an unpublished treatise Nishmat Hayyim dealing with re
punishment in the hereafter.2 There is nothing extraordinar
fact that Aboab's literary activity included a work of th
His colleague Menasseh ben Israel published a work of t
title, which became rather famous, in 1651, having brou
in 1636, his tripartite treatise on the Resurrection of th
both Latin and Spanish.3 Saul Levi Morteira, Senior Hah
the Amsterdam Rabbinate,4 wrote a tract on Immortali
* The English section of this paper was read at the Annual Meetin
American Academy for Jewish Research in New York on December
1 See D. Henriques de Castro, Keur van Grafsteenen op de Nederl.-
Israkl. Begraafsplaats te Ouderkerk aan den Amstel, I (Leiden, 188
76; Cecil Roth, art. "Isaac Aboab de Fonseca," Encyclopaedia Judai
2, pp. 95-96.
2 See de Castro, op. cit., p. 73, No. g; M. Kayserling, Biblioteca Espainola-
Portugueza-Judaica (Strasbourg, 1890), p. 5. The work is not listed in Johann
Christoph Wolf's article on "R. Isaacus Aboab, junior" in Bibliotheca Hebraea,
III (1727), pp. 537-539.
3 Cecil Roth, A Life of Menasseh Ben Israel (Philadelphia, 1945), pp. 93 f.,
97-99, et passim.
4 On Saul Levi Morteira (Morteyra; Mortera; Mortara; ca. 1596-1660) see
Cecil Roth, A Life of Menasseh Ben Israel, p. 24 ff., et passim; Kayserling,
Biblioteca, p. 74 f.; Shelomo Simonsohn (ed.), Rabbi Yehuda Arye Mi-Modena,
She'elot U-Teshubhot Ziicney Yehuda (Jerusalem, 5716/1956), Introduction, p.
47 f.; Text, p. 75 f.
5 It is part of his Obras originaes which are extant in manuscripts (420
pp.) at the Library of the "Portugees Israeilietisch Seminarium Ets Haim" in
Amsterdam. See Carl Gebhardt, Die Schriften des Uriel da Costa (Amsterdam,
1922), p. 247.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
2 ALTMANN [2]
another colleague, M
in manuscript, a Trata
one may assume that
da Costa's denial of i
Samuel da Silva's refutation of da Costa in his Tratado da Immor-
talidade (1623).8 In 1633 da Costa had been placed under herem
for the second time and the fresh publicity thereby given to the
apostate's views during the last phase of his life - his suicide
occurred in 1640 - may have aroused a sense of obligation on
the rabbis' part to fortify the community's belief in the traditional
tenets of immortality and resurrection.
Isaac Aboab's Nishmat IHayyim, though composed, as we shall
see, in that very period, is the document of a controversy which
had caused a rift within the Amsterdam rabbinate itself. Those
primarily involved in the dispute were Aboab and Morteira; bu
far from being a purely theological issue, the question at stak
had created a great deal of ferment in the community. As our
analysis will show, the conflict embraced two distinct, though
closely related, levels, one theological and the other pragmatic
and the arguments advanced on the pragmatic level were clearl
inspired by Marrano sentiment. The position taken by Aboab an
the faction led by him reflected a basic concern to assert the in
alienable Jewishness of all Marranos. Aboab himself was a former
Marrano, born a Catholic in Castro d'Aire, Portugal. After a shor
stay in Saint-Jean de Luz in the southwest of France, his parent
had brought him, at the age of seven, to Amsterdam, where he
had studied with Haham Isaac 'Uzi'el of Fez and had become
Haham of the congregation Beth Israel at the age of twenty-one

6 Gebhardt, loc. cit.


7 Gebhardt, op. cit., p. XXXII.
8 Gebhardt, op. cit., pp. XXIX; 35-64 (65-101). Harry A. Wolfson has
made it plausible that Spinoza too meant to oppose Uriel da Costa whe
he affirmed the immortality of the soul. See his The Philosophy of Spino
(Cambridge, Mass., 1934; New York, 1969), II, p. 323 ff.; 350; and Religiou
Philosophy, A Group of Essays (Cambridge, Mass., 1961; New York, 1965),
p. 268.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[31 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 3
Another Marrano, Abraham Herrera, a discipl
had tutored him in Kabbala.9 The mystical th
had adopted supplied the intellectual armor -
with which he defended his viewpoint. Saul Lev
other hand, was of Ashkenazi descent.10 Born i
year 1596, he seems to have studied with Leon
in a responsum,11 referred to him as "one de
bhen yakir ii). The fact that Morteira's name d
da Modena's list of disciples "reared and broug
can be explained by his departure from Venice
of twenty before he had matured as a scholar
Aboab, the ardent devotee of Kabbala, Mortei
caught his teacher's distrust of the mystical tr
ist of no mean quality, he showed also some i
Hebrew philosophical literature.13 It could hav
of surprise to the Amsterdam community to
Morteira on opposite sides of the fence in the

9 For the biographical data see note 1 and the literat


article. On Aboab's relationship to Herrera see the text
(# 6, lines 23-25; # 7, lines 49-53) published below an
10 Wolf, Bibliotheca Hebraea, p. 1000 f. quotes from
de Barrios' Arbol de la Vida (Amsterdam, 1689) a refer
German origin: "Fille Saul Levi Mortera/de Alemania n
11 Zikcney Yehuda (see note 4), Nr. 54, p. 76.
12 See Yehuda (Ludwig) Blau (ed.), Kitebhey Ha-Rab
Modena (Budapest, 5666/1905), pp. 169-170.
13 His philosophical bent is manifested in his Gibhe'at
1645; Warsaw, 1912), a collection of homilies, and in t
printed below, where he refers to Maimonides as "the
(rosh ha-medabberim; line 48) and quotes Isaac 'Ar~ima
Albo (103-106), and Isaac Abrabanel's Naihalat Abhot an
123). Like Abrabanel, he restricts transmigration of so
three times (Text A, 93-97; Gibhe'at Sha'ul, No. 48, pp
Warsaw edition). Leone da Modena attacked the doctrin
in a tract Ben David written during the winter of 163
time of the Amsterdam controversy, at the request of
in Egypt, who had lost a young son. See Abraham Gei
(Breslau, 1856), p. 12.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
4 ALTMAN N [4]

erupted. Their radic


have been apparent
The controversy is d
here for the first t
one of them. All three texts are extant in Hebrew MS. 5 of The
John Rylands Library, Manchester, which contains the book plate
of the Duke of Sussex and was sold as Lot 398 in the Sale of his
Library, 3rd August 1844, when it was bought by Payne.14 Two
of them are described in Thomas Joseph Pettigrew's Bibliotheca
Sussexiana, Volume I, Part I (London, 1827), p. XXXII: oyXmn

32. A Dissertation proving the doctrine of Eternal Punishment,


by Rabbi Shamanyah the son of Moshe de Medina, and
Azaryah the son of Ephraim Peguh of Venice, in a letter
addressed to Rabbi Yetzchak Abuhab, in contradiction to the
doctiine then held forth. Ms. in chart. Saec. XVII. Octavo.
Six leaves... Bound up with this Ms. ...
33. Abuhab (Y) The book Nishmat Chajim on the question of
Eternal Punishment. Ms. in chart. scrip. 5408 (1648). Octavo.
Twenty-three leaves.... This treatise is against the doctrine of
Eternal Punishment.
Pettigrew did not notice that No. 32 contains two items, viz.
a dissertation (hasa'd) and the letter mentioned. After the disser-
tation two folios are left blank. There are similar blank folios else-
where in the MS. at the ends of individual pieces.15 Ben Jacob's
Osar Ha-Sefarim (p. 283, No. 232) copied Pettigrew's entry about
No. 32, and Leopold Lodwenstein's valuable essay on the Aboab
14 Information supplied by Miss G. Matheson, Assistant Keeper, Depart-
ment of Manuscripts, The John Rylands Library, Manchester, and commu-
nicated to me by Dr. F. Taylor, Librarian. I wish to express my sincere thanks
to Dr. Taylor and his predecessor, Mr. Ronald Hall, M.A. for their kindness
in providing me with photostats of the texts concerned and for granting me
permission, on behalf of the Governors, to publish them.
15 Miss Matheson suggested that these may correspond to the ends of
quires. It need not be assumed, therefore, that there is a hiatus after Text A
and that any document is missing.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[5] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 5
Family, though making distinct reference on
tioned also the controversy and the support g
the two Venetian rabbis.16 Strangely enough, he
No. 32 from which his information derived. P
had no access to Pettigrew's catalog and receiv
at second hand from someone who did not bother to be accurate.

Otherwise, L6wenstein would not have stated that Aboab upheld,


while Morteira denied, eternal punishment. The true position is
the exact reverse and was correctly reported by Pettigrew. On the
other hand, L6wenstein's informant deserves credit for having sup-
plied an important piece of information which he could not have
culled from Pettigrew: He discovered that the copyist's preamble
to the Venetian rabbis' letter contains, in cryptic form, a reference
to Morteira as Aboab's opponent in the controversy. It speaks of

him as a*S kI,, the superlinear dots indicating that the three
letters form an acrostic to be read: nwtv~z 'i ,i . Pettigrew
had obviously been at a loss to identify the reference to Morteira,
the only one found in the entire source material at our disposal.
Thanks to this item of information, LiSwenstein was able to state
that the dispute was one between Aboab and Morteira. Nothing
beyond this bare report has ever been published about the con-
flict.17

16 See Leopold Loiwenstein, "Die Familie Aboab," MGWJ, 48, N.F. 12


(1904), pp. 668-673; particularly 671 f. and note 3 on p. 672.
17 In 1919, the Reverend Dr. Abraham Cohen, Birmingham, England, who
during his previous stay in Manchester had studied the three texts at the
Rylands Library, inquired in a letter to the then Librarian whether the Trus-
tees would commission him to prepare an edition. The answer seems to have
been in the negative since the project did not materialize. The letter, which is
dated March 31, 1919 and a copy of which has been kindly put at my disposal
by Dr. Taylor, described Aboab's Sefer Nishmat Hayyim as "not only unique"
but also as "an unknown work of this author, none of the bibliographers
making mention of it." While these observations were incorrect, the charac-
ter of the treatise is aptly described: "The work is Kabbalistic in spirit and
abounds in quotations from the Talmud, Maimonides, Nahlmanides, the Zohar
and little known medieval Kabbalists. But Aboab has the annoying habit of
citing his authorities by name without giving the quotation, or giving only
the opening words followed by 'etc.' On my visits to London I spent much

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
6 ALTMANN [6]
The documents testif
following texts, wh
notated edition:
Text A (Ryl. Hebrew MS. 5, fols. lr-4v), a Letter - Pettigrew's
"dissertation" - addressed to an unspecified rabbinic court, which
gives a dramatic account of events at the early stage of the dispute
and makes a strong plea for support of the traditional doctrine
of eternal punishment for certain grave offences. It cites an im-
pressive array of authorities who upheld this doctrine in the past,
and it implores the Beth Din to declare the contrary view an out-
right heresy (kefird). The document is undated and unsigned. The
missing information can be easily inferred, however, from Text B,
which leaves no doubt that Text A was written prior to January,
1636; that Haham Saul Levi Morteira was its author; and that
his plea was directed to the Beth Din of Venice.
Text B (Ryl. Hebrew MS. 5, fols. 5r-6r), a Letter written in
Venice during the week of Parashat Shemot in the year 5396,
which corresponds to one of the first few weeks in 1636. It is
signed by two well-known Venetian rabbis, viz. Shema'ya -ben
Moshe di Medina, grandson of the famous Samuel di Medina
(MahaRaSHDaM),18 and 'Azarya ben Ephraim Figo, author of
the homiletical work Bind La-'Ittim.19 The Letter sought to per-

time at the British Museum tracing and completing these references; and I
am now ready for the work of editing." Regrettably, it was a case of love's
labor's lost.
18 A native of Salonica, Shema'ya di Medina was one of the rabbis of
Venice, whose name appears under many decisions of the yeshibha kelalit.
He wrote a commentary on Proverbs (unpublished) and edited his grand-
father's sermons (Sefer Ben Shemu'el) with an introduction of his own, which
contains many autobiographical references. See Mordecai Samuel Ghirondi
and Hanan'el Neppi, Toledot Gedoley Yisra'el U-Ge'oney Italia - Zekher
Saddikc Li-Bherakha (Trieste, 1853), pp. 352, 323, 358; Shelomo Simonsohn,
op. cit., p. 48 (Introduction).
19 "Azarya Figo (Pigo; Pichio), born in 1589, was a disciple of Leone da
Modena's (1571-1648), whose list of favorite students he heads (see Blau,
op. cit., p. 168). A responsum addressed to him by his teacher vividly illus-
trates their happy relationship (see Blau, loc. cit., No. 87, pp. 85-87). Figo
published a commentary to the Sefer Ha-Terumot of Samuel ben Isaac Ha-

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[7] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 7

suade Aboab to make a public declaration re


It contains important information on the co
beyond the stage reflected in Morteira's Letter.
document bears a date enables us to place th
controversy in the year 1635, if not somewhat
preamble reveals Morteira's role as Aboab
already been noted. Incidentally, the preamb
to the year in which Texts A and B (which ar
were copied. For the scribe refers to Shema
still alive (vI"a) and to "Azarya Figo as one alr
Since Figo is known to have died on Adar 4t
di Medina is known to have died on Siwan 1
copyist must have written these texts between
and the summer of 1648.20

Text C, Aboab's elaborate treatise Nishmat IHayyim, is extant


in three copies (Cl; C2; C3), which enables us to present a critical
edition of it. C1 is Ryl. Hebrew MS. 5, fols. 9r-31v. C2 and C3 are
extant in the Library of the "Portugees Israelietisch Seminarium
Ets Haim," Amsterdam, bearing the shelf marks MS. 47 C 25 and
MS. 47 C 3 respectively.21 The title page of C1 indicates that the
Sefer Nishmat IHayyim was composed (zibbero) in Amsterdam in
the year 5408 (1648) and copied (nikhtabh) by Isaac (ben Moshe
Rafa'el) de Cordova. The same date of composition is given on
the title page of C2, which was likewise copied by Isaac de Cor-
dova, as is attested by the colophon at the end of five more pieces

Sardi under the title Gidduley Terumd (Venice, 1643). His Bind La-'lttim fol-
lowed in 1648. See Abba Apfelbaum, Rabbi "Azarya Figo (Drohobitsch, 5667/
1907); Israel Bettan, "The Sermons of Azariah Figo," HUCA, VII (1930),
pp. 457-495; Simonsohn, op. cit., p. 56 (Introduction).
20 For the date of Figo's death see Blau, op. cit., p. 85; the date of Shema'ya
di Medina is given as Siwan 13th (June 3rd), 1648 by Steinschneider, Cat.
Bodl., No. 7117, p. 2516 f.
21 I am greatly obliged to Miss Erla Broekema, Librarian of the Seminary
Ets Haim in Amsterdam, for informing me of the existence of the additional
two MSS. of Aboab's treatise and for putting microfilms at my disposal.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
8 ALTMANN [8]
in the same hand. C3
It was copied by Davi
C1 excels in beauty o
bly illuminated. It sh
borne aloft by cheru
side). They depict, over
lowing events: David d
David; Elijah bringing
Solomon's judgment.
four crowns are inscr
and shemr tobh. The fi
within a garland, abov
scription: 'Ateret tif'e
C2, though less ornam
page shows beneath t
placed in an aureole o
trumpets, with sheets
King David playing th
by two female figure
under an arched roof
title in the center form
title page of C3 has a
MSS. It is decorated w
initial sentence on pag
by flowers.
The fact that according to C1 and C2 the treatise was composed
in the year 1648 is rather puzzling. Aboab could not have com-
posed it in Amsterdam in that year because he left Holland for
Brazil in 1642 and did not return until 1654. He had accepted an
invitation to become the rabbi of the prosperous Jewish community
of Recife, Brazil, which was under Dutch rule at the time, and

22 Information supplied by Miss Broekema (July 15 and October 24, 1971).


A manuscript of Nishmat lUayyim written by David Franco Mendes is men-
tioned by J. S. Da Silva, lets over den Amsterdamschen Opperabbijn Isaic
Aboab (Amsterdam, 1913), p. 12.
23 Viz. 2 Sam. 6:14; 1 Sam. 16:12; 1 Kings 18:37; 1 Kings 3:28.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[9] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 9
had thus become the first American rabbi. When Portuguese reb
bands started a war of liberation in 1645, he remained with
flock and endured the terrible hardships of the siege of Recif
1646. While many Calvinist preachers returned to Holland, he
not leave until after the final conquest of the city by the Portugu
troops in 1654, when all Jews were forced to emigrate. His e
poem Zekher 'asiti le-nifle'ot El is considered by the histor
an important document of the events of that time.24 The ter
through which he and his congregants had passed are also referr
to in the preface to his Hebrew version of Herrera's Puerta
Cielo (Sha'ar ha-Shamayim, Amsterdam, 1655). There he rend
thanks to God who had brought him out of the kur ha-brazil
Brazilian furnace).25 As recorded in the minute book of the Unit
Congregation Talmud Torah in Amsterdam on Elul 29th, 54
September 1654,26 Aboab was reinstated as Haham, a capacity
which he served until his death at the age of eighty-nine in 1693
Since there is incontestible evidence that he stayed in Brazil from
1642 until 1654, the title page of C1 has to be understood in

following
Aboab sense: Sefer
in Amsterdam Nishmat
(i.e. while still inH.ayyim composed
Amsterdam). by Rabbi Isaac
The indication
of the year 5408 (1648) in the next line refers to the year in which
de Cordova copied the text. As we have noted above, Texts A and
B were copied about the same time. It is not clear what prompted

24 See M. Kayserling, "Isaac Aboab, the First Jewish Author in America,"


Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, No. 5 (1897), pp. 125-
136; Idem, Rabbi Yiszac Aboab Ha-Shelishi, in: Ha-Goren (ed. S. A. Horo-
detzki), III (1902), pp. 155-174; Arnold Wiznitzer, Jews in Colonial Brazil
(New York, 1960), index s. v. Fonseca; Hermann Wiitjen, Das holliindische
Kolonialreich in Brasilien (Haag-Gotha, 1921), p. 237; C. R. Boxer, The Dutch
in Brazil 1624-1654 (Oxford, 1957), pp. 181, 274.
25 A pun on the Biblical phrase describing the slavery in Egypt (Dt. 4:20;
1 Kings 8:51; Jer. 11:4). See the Warsaw, 1864 (Israel reprint 1969) edition of
Sha'ar Ha-Shamayim, p. 23.
26 See Wiznitzer, op. cit., p. 170.
27 He died on Adar II 27th, 5453/April 4th, 1693 (see De Castro, op. cit.,
68). Morteira died on Shebhat 25th, 5420/February 9th, 1660.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
10 ALTMANN [10]
the copying of the docu
time when Aboab was n
Since the year 1642, in w
represents the terminus a
we still have to settle t
ginated. In our view th
thereabouts. Evidence t
criteria as a degree of em
to score points in an on
arguments brought for
Aboab's angry rebuttal o
ponent, he was a mere y
on the assumption that it
when Aboab was still c
in 1635-36. He was then
forty. A few years later
sidered quite irrelevant,
retort29 would have been
ful impetuosity. Hence
documents of the cont
1635-36.

The course of events which emerges from the documents at our


disposal was as follows. As Morteira's Letter (Text A) described
the controversy at its initial stage, a new-fangled doctrine had
taken hold of many young people in the Amsterdam community.
It assured every Jew, no matter how grave his sins, of a share
of bliss in the world-to-come. The Mishnaic phrase "All Israelites

28 Strongly emotional passages: # 1, lines 12-15; # 3, 99; # 6, 4-11; #7,


5-6; 48; 68-69. References to arguments used: # 1, 21-22 (Maimonides); 49-
51 (Albo); # 8, 6-15 (Marranos); 18-20 (Kabbalistic sources). Rebuttal of
charge: #7, 7-19.
29 #7, 7-19. Although it was not uncommon in rabbinic circles
of the 16th and 17th centuries to refer to men of 35 or 40 years of
age, even when married, as bahurim, as Me'ir Benayahu, Sefer Toledot Ha-'Ari
(Jerusalem 1967), p. 176, note 2 has shown by a wealth of material, Aboab
personally does not seem to have taken kindly to the description of him as
a sa'ir.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[11 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 11
have a portion in 'olam ha-ba"' (Sanh. 11:1) w
about as a slogan in complete disregard of the qual
had been applied to it in the Mishna itself and
rabbinic sources. In the words of the thesis (ha
Morteira's avowed purpose to refute: "Whosoe
the name Israelite will not suffer eternal punishm
he may have committed the gravest possible s
Kabbalists, Morteira pointed out, who were re
spreading of this false doctrine of salvation f
more specifically characterized those propoundi
logy as "maskilim who claimed to be proficient
Kabbala,"32 and he called the new heresy "a roc
stone of stumbling33 dressed up as Kabbala."34 To
rabbinic sources were the only "trustworthy Kabb
between him and the partisans of uncondition
Jewish souls is portrayed in the following acco
experience:36 In the course of a sermon37 he h
sage in Rosh Ha-Shand 17a which affirms the eter

ment
rosim,in hell
etc. Hefor
hadsuch
addedgrave
a hostoffenders as minim, supporting
of other quotations informers, api.oro-
this doctrine. The result was an outburst of indignation. Among
the congregants "were some of those young men who were deficient
(bilti shelemim) in this belief, and their party lodged such vigorous
complaint against me that in my anguish I was compelled to admit
as controversial a perfect doctrine of our faith which we received

30 Text A, lines 1-2.


31 Lines 14-15.
32 Ibid.
33 Cf. Isa. 8:14.
34 Lines 201-202.
35 Line 16.
36 Lines 16-26.
37 The sermon in question could not have been the one published in his
Gibhe'at Sha'ul (No. 48, parashat wa-yelekh, Warsaw, 1912, p. 295 ff.). Al-
though the latter affirms eternal punishment in hell for certain transgressions,
it is philosophically structured, not primarily surveying the Talmudic material
as did the sermon spoken of in our text.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
12 ALTMANN [12]
from our Fathers, the
and which, permitting
authorities." The rebel
pronounced as normati
controversy. Another
believing in the eternal
religion of the Christi
and that, on this accou
atonement for it by hi
ing support to the Chris
of the young radicals t
of the communal leaders
ding me to give further
commit grave sins and
punishment."39 It was w
leaders with the seriousn
of the group formulat
(p. 11). Morteira's repo
they would hardly find a
formulated the followin
to believe that the wicke
to eternal punishment
that a refusal to believe
demned as heresy, and
to their position so long
As Text B reveals, it w
was to settle the issue,
was intended to elicit
eternalist doctrine.
It will have been noted that Isaac Aboab's name is not men-
tioned in Morteira's Letter to the Venice authorities. The villains
of the piece are the radical students referred to by him as "im-
mature disciples" (talmidim she-lo' shimeshu kol zorekam). To il-
38 Text A, lines 202-204.
39 Lines 204-206.
40 Lines 207-210.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[13] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 13
lustrate their immaturity and the excesses of
capable Morteira cites the case of one who publ
he wished his soul were the soul of Jeroboam son of Nebhat
which had been said to be sure of a portion in the world-t
come.41 Aboab was not altogether free from blame for statements
of this kind since the young man in question may have heard him
say that according to a kabbalistic view the soul of Jeroboam
was to be reincarnated in Mashiah ben Yosef. Aboab's Nishma
IHayyim quotes this opinion approvingly.42 It was, therefore, par-
donable if his enthusiastic disciple entertained messianic aspira
tions. The master was obviously unable to curb the zeal of hi
students but he himself seems to have kept in the background
at least at the initial stage of the conflict. Otherwise the two
Venetian rabbis could not have expressed even feigned surpri
when, somewhat later, he publicly championed the cause of th
anti-eternalists.43 As their Letter indicates, the rift caused by the
controversy made it imperative to the community leaders to su
mit the case to the Venice Beth Din. Both parties entered the
respective pleas supported by elaborate arguments.44 Text A u
doubtedly represents the plea submitted by Morteira. We do n
possess the plea of the other party, unless we consider Aboab
Nishmat Iiayyim to be it. This is most unlikely, however, for t
following reasons. First, it neither addresses itself to any Beth Din

nor
or a does
plea. it ask for
Second, its alength
verdict. It constitutes
is that a pesa.,polemical
of a full-fledged not a she'eld
treatise. Third, it is so replete with personal references to him-
self - mentioning as it does his youthful age, his teacher Herrera,
his attachment to Lurianic Kabbala -that the two Venetian rabbis,
in their letter to him, could not have pretended to have been
ignorant of his role in the conflict. We must therefore assume that
the plea submitted by the radical group was a document now lost,
in the drafting of which Aboab was involved but which was dif-

41 Lines 198-200.
42 Text C, #3, lines 69-72.
43 Text B, lines 46-49.
44 Text B, lines 24-27.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
14 ALTMANN [14]
ferent in many respects
afterwards, though not
As Text B informs us, t
ments of the case not direct to the Beth Din of Venice but to the
old and venerable Abraham Aboab, one of the most highly res-
pected members of the Venetian community,45 requesting him to
transmit the papers to the Court. Before acting upon this request
Abraham Aboab took counsel, however, with rabbis Shema'ya
di Medina and 'Azarya Figo and they strongly advised against
placing a matter of this kind before the Beth Din. The issuance
of a pesak, they argued, might be misinterpreted by the rank and
file as evidence of some doubt in the matter, and this could have
a morally damaging effect. Moreover, the Beth Din was sure to
confirm Molteira's opinion. As a result, his opponent (whose
identity was undoubtedly known to them) would find himself in
an embarrassing position, and the strife would only become more
heated. It was the delicacy of the situation, involving as it did
two members of the Amsterdam Beth Din, which made it appear
preferable to withhold the case from the Venice authorities. At di
Medina's and Figo's suggestion Abraham Aboab returned the
documents to Amsterdam, pleading at the same time with the
community leaders to restore the peace by prevailing upon Isaac
Aboab to renounce his view in public and by his example to cause
the rest.of the dissenters to follow suit. It was the failure of this
strategy which prompted the two rabbis to write direct to Aboab.
Their Letter (Text B) is a paradigm of ecclesiastic diplomacy.
It opens with some flattering remarks about Aboab's high reputa-
tion as a Talmudist and thinker, which had awakened in them a
desire to enjoy his friendship. God had willed to present him with
an opportunity for evincing his full moral stature in public and

45 Lines 28-45. Abraham Aboab had founded the Synagogue "Keter Tora"
in Hamburg before moving to Venice, where he died in 1642. His eulogy by
Figo is contained in Bind La-'lttim (No. 77). See L6wenstein, op. cit., 674;
Apfelbaum, op. cit., passim. Abraham Aboab's eldest son Samuel (1610-1694)
was first rabbi in Verona. He became rabbi in Venice in 1650 and was the
author of the Responsa Debhar Shemu'el (Venice, 1702).

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[15] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 15
thereby enhancing the glory of God, which they w
he desired. Some time ago the aged Abraham Ab
them to the controversy that had arisen in Amster
pleas that were to be submitted to the Venice B
telling the story of the consultation and the advice
the Letter continues:46 "We were hoping for the
bring the message of peace... but our expectation
trated. For we were again informed that the conf
that the spokesman of those denying the belief i
of punishment is none other than you, Sir (hu' nihu
you preach thus openly and publicly." The two
to say that they were not a little aggrieved to lea
whom they wished to honor and whose reputat
hate to see tarnished in the least was in support of
to traditional doctrine. Their only consolation lay
that it would have been far worse had the group
irresponsible, self-willed person. The fact that it
a godfearing man gave grounds for hope since he co
to live up to what was said in Proverbs 12:15: "H
hearkeneth unto counsel." The rest of the Lette
appeal imploring Aboab to abandon a view whic
to the principles of the Talmud, and to refrain,
preaching and publicizing it. What he ought to do w
at a public gathering that he had now seen the
firmly convinced that certain grave transgressions w
to be punished eternally. He would know best ho
declaration and how to warn the group (ha-kat ha
ventuiing rash opinions on subjects of this kind. It
appropriate to issue such warning to "those of
came from those places," i.e. Marranos, who "sh
one thing, namely the way how to serve God in
temimut) and how to fulfil the miswot accordin
all their minutiae."47

46 Text B, lines 45-54.


47 Text B, lines 56-72.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
16 ALTMANN [16]

Far from intimidating


rabbis only served to s
mat IHayyim was his a
defiance. Had it been p
the Letter from Venice would have been inevitable. The fact that
the rabbis only mentioned his preaching and urged him to refrain
from preaching and publicizing his views appears to suggest that
nothing was known about a treatise written, let alone in circu-

lation. Aboab's
(teshubhd) to theNishmat
question H.ayyim presents "Is
(sha'al ha-sho'el):48 itself as eternal
there a responsum
punishment of souls or not? And what did our rabbis, of blessed
memory, intend by saing, The following have no share in the
world-to-come ?" The answer opens with the ringing statement:49
"Truly speaking, matters of this kind have been entrusted only to
the Kabbalists, illumined as they are by the light of truth." There
follows a frontal attack upon the adepts of philosophy, who "lean
upon a broken reed" and are unqualified to interpret the profound
utterances of the rabbis. By asserting the role of Kabbala as the
only competent authority for the interpretation of rabbinic dicta
Aboab clearly opposed Morteira's initial statement that the Tal-
mudic tradition as such was the only "trustworthy Kabbala."
Aboab's rejection of the philosophers' exegesis of rabbinic escha-
tology is likewise directed against Morteira who had quoted
Maimonides and Albo. According to Aboab, "we have no dealings
with Maimonides as far as this subject is concerned, for he dis-
cussed it from the aspect of philosophical inquiry, and not from
the aspect of Kabbala."50 "Neither do we turn to the words of
the philosopher R. Joseph Albo, for he has nothing to say (al-bo)
in matters of kabbalistic science."51 There is a note of bitterness
in Aboab's complaint that his adversaries mocked at his zealous
running after teachers of Kabbala: He did indeed belong to what
his denigrators called kat ha-shotim (the party of fools) but the

48 Text C, lines 5-6.


49 1, line 7 sq.
50 41, 21--22.
51 #1, 53-54.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[17] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 17

word had to be spelled with a taw: He was on


"drank" (shotim) the waters of Tora and sat at the

True, he was young in years but the true "elder


one who had acquired wisdom, and in this resp
than his opponents who became more foolish a
in years.52 Morteira had quoted some kabbalist
take the wind out of the other party's sails bu
Kabbala had only incensed Aboab in whose view
right of interpreting kabbalistic passages unless
tiated into the esoteric tradition by a qualified
himself a link in that tradition.s53 Aboab proudly
this requirement sitice his teacher Abraham Her
Luria's teachings from Israel Sarug, who was a d
disciple IIayyim Vital.54
Outwardly viewed, the conflict between Aboa
may seem to have been a mere rehash of the old ri
pure Talmudists, philosophizing rabbis and Kabb
mate would be justified had the controversy been p
What makes it historically interesting are the non-
matic arguments which were advanced on both
evoked so much feeling on the part of Aboab's
point pressed home by Aboab and his faction w
of ultimate salvation for all Jewish souls. It w
suggest, by a sense of concern for those Marr
yet, not returned to the fold or, having returned,
remiss in their duties or had relapsed into their ol
words, the issue at stake was the recognition of
inseparably belonging to the people of Israel an
election and privileges. Underlying this claim w
notion of the exalted nature of Jewish souls which had been in-
creasingly stressed in the kabbalistic tradition. The question of
the status of the Marranos had been a matter of debate during
the last phase of Spanish Jewry and among the generation of the
52 47, 15-19.
53 #7, 20-26; 60-67.
54 #6, 23-25; #7, 48-58.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
18 ALTMANN [18]

expulsion,55 and it h
seventeenth century.5
presented here that i
behind the discussion
teira condemned the
eternalists as one like
"impure land" and to
fear concerning the ult
Moreover, he asserted
spread to would-be-emi
where. Finally, what w
for martyrdom if salv
alike?57 The two Ven
effect which the new
ranos.58 Aboab's repl
The doctrine of ultim
promise a bed of rose
of God. It merely asser
of its sins in what mig
entailing much suffer
Marranos would be sw
consequences of sin and
for the sake of mate
this answer is the re
least, virtual Jews.60
55 See Hjayyim Hillel Be
26 (1961), pp. 34-43; B. N
XIVth to the Early XVIth
(New York, 1966).
56 See Yosef Hayim Yerus
Cardoso: A Study in Seven
(New York & London, 19
57 Text A, lines 190-199;
58 Text B, 59 Text
lines C, #8,
71-74.
60 This mystically inspire
view (op. cit., p. 39 f.) th
Christian was a potential
could transform 61 Text
into C
an ac

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[19] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 19

is what oui rabbis, of blessed memory, mean


phrase, 'Though he sinned, he is still an Isia
ha.ta' yisra'el hu').62 They intended to convey th
he sinned, he was not cut off thereby for ever
remained a Jew; and even if he apostatized f
hemir et Ha-Shem) and chose new gods, he
a Jew as a result of transmigrations, and pu
the words of David ibn Abi Zimra quoted by
passage,63 "All Israelites are a single body (guf e
is hewn ftom the place of Unity (mi-mekom
The radical students whom Morteira described as "maskilim
claiming proficiency in Kabbala" were not only Aboab's discip
but, like him and the vast majority of Amsterdam Jews at the tim
also of Marrano descent. Their argument that belief in the et
nality of punishment reeked of Christian dogma must be evaluate
against their personal background. What inspired it was more tha
mere theological quibbling. Behind it lies the question: Is it worth
while for a Marrano to shed Christian beliefs if on arrival in
Judaism he meets again the doctrine of eternal damnation ? It must
have been known in Amsterdam circles that Uriel da Costa had
discarded Christianity because the dread of eternal damnation
had to-rmented him in his youth, as he confessed in his auto-
biography.64 True, his Exemplar Humanae Vitae was written as
late as 1640 and was not published until 1687.65 Yet his story was
common knowledge among Amsterdam Marranos. His impas-
sionate disavowal of both Christian and Jewish eschatological
doctrines had occasioned some literary activity on the part of the
Amsterdam rabbinate, as has been noted above.66 The shadow
of da Costa may be discerned behind the young intellectuals'
argument that by affirming eternal punishment we were back in

62 Sanhedrin 44a; see Jacob Katz, Yisrael af 'al pi she-bata', in: Tarbiz, 27
(1958), pp. 203-217.
63 Text C, #6, 19-21.
64 See Gebhardt, op. cit., pp. 124 f.
65 Gebhardt, op. cit., 259 sq.
66 P. l f.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
20 ALTMANN [20]
Christianity. This line of
typical of Marranos. What
was the mystical concep
Jewish souls and the conco
in integrum (which will b
'There was, at the same
troversy. The protest ag
eternal punishment is indi
gaining ground under the
to 1638, in the very perio
Dutch translations of So
probably in Amsterdam,
Socinianism in its native
of the movement.67 Thoug
of the trinitarian dogma
Collegiants, represented
rigorous Calvinist dogma
doctrine of eternal dam
these dissident groups s
solatory rather than terri
a crypto-Socinian,69 wro
of punishment on the gro
of God.70 This work wa
of thinking could have

67 See H. John McLachlan, S


(Oxford, 1951), p. 23 f.
68 See Leo Strauss' characteri
kritik Spinozas als Grundlage
69 He was professor of medic
In his youth he had spent a
van Slee, De Geschiedenis van
1914), p. 45. It was he who co
(cf. Slee, op. cit., p. 201).
70 Ernesti Sonneri Demonstra
piorum supplicia non arguant
Socini, item E. Sonneri tractat
editi... (Eleutheropoli, 16 54).

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[21] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 21

eighteenth century it became famous as a result


to refute it and the controversy which ensued b
defended, and Johann August Eberhard, who
Hugo Grotius, who had assailed Socinianism i
his opinions under the growing impact of th
an extent that Socinian writers were inclined to claim him as a
convert. His treatise De veritate religionis Christianae, which ap-
peared in 1627, already testifies to his change of mind. Grotius'
contact with Menasseh ben Israel is well known,73 and, in general,
the lines of communication between the Amsterdam Jewish Ghetto
and the intellectual world outside were wide open. Aboab's courage
in taking so strong a stand against the eternalist position thus
reflected the spiritual stirrings of his time. He motivated his un-
relenting fight against the traditional view by pointing out that he
could not bear to see God's mercies upon his creatures impugned,74
and more than once he used the phrase "God forbid" (has we-

.Ialila) whenwith
reconcilable rejecting
belief inthe doctrine
a just of eternal
and merciful God.75punishment
Notwith- as ir-
standing his dislike of philosophical arguments, he made ample
use of Albo's treatment of the theme:76 Isaiah (66:24) and Daniel
(12:2) "did not mean to say that the punishment was eternal -
'Far be it from God, that He should do wickedness; and from
the Almighty, that He should commit iniquity' (Job 34:10) - to
punish man, who is 'dust from the earth' (Gen. 2:7) and 'a wind
that passeth away, and cometh not again' (Ps. 78:39), with an
eternal punishment, while sin derives from his material part, which
is corruptible and non-eternal. Thus David said, 'Also unto Thee,
O Lord, belongeth mercy; for Thou renderest to every man ac-
71 For a discussion of this controversy see Henry E. Allion, Lessing and
the Enlightenment (Ann Arbor, 1966), pp. 86-93.
72 In his Defensio Fidei Catholicae de Satisfactione Christi adversus Faustum
Socinum Senensem (Leiden, 1617).
73 See Cecil Roth, A Life of Menasseh Ben Israel, pp. 146-148 et passim.
74 Text C, :7, lines 46-48.
75 #2, 51; #3, 145; #5, 28. God's mercy: #3, 65-66; #5, 53-54; 65-
66; 46, 36-38.
76 # 5, 24-34.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
22 ALTMANN [22]
cording to his work' (P
formed by him who is
mere creature, against
adversely affected by t
substantiated his own v
sentence:77 "All this is
ment (ke-fi mishpat ha-g
were afraid lest, apart f
Marranos, the lenient n
sion among the non-Jews
should the Gentiles say
good fortune, the right
nothing will be withhold
(Gen. 11:6); for the fea
hears here an echo of t
in the regnant Dutch C
new liberal trends.
As a mystic and adept of the new Kabbala of Safed, Aboab
could afford to be more liberal than the strict Talmudists and phi-
losophizing rabbis. We meet a similar phenomenon in the seven-
teenth century Christian mystics of England and Germany who
followed in the footsteps of Jacob Boehme. It was these mystics
who ushered in a new eschatology by reviving the anathematized
doctrine of apokatastasis pantin, which goes back to Origen and
proclaims the restoration of all things to their pristine harmony
in God. They did so in open opposition to the orthodox theology
of eternal damnation.79 Aboab's treatise Nishmat IHayyim repre-
sents a seventeenth century Jewish attempt to break the spell
of the traditional eschatology of hell by publicly embracing the

Lurianic
tasis) doctrine
through of tik.un (theofHebrew
the transmigration souls. Inequivalent
so doing hefor apokatas-
rein-
forced a trend which had been in evidence ever since the notion

77 # 8, 44.
78 Text A, lines 221-223.
79 See Ernst Benz, "Der Mensch und die Sympathie aller Dinge am Ende
der Zeiten," Eranos-Jahrbuch, XXIV (1955), p. 157 ff.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[23] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 23

of metempsychosis (gilgul) began to clash wit


theory of hell,80 and which had played a do
thinking of David ibn Abi Zimra, who was
Aboab was by no means an innovator. His me
ness with which he not only affirmed the Luri
attacked the time-honored eternalist position. T
to dislodge the notion of eternal punishm
Mendelssohn in his time had been anticipated m
before by Isaac Aboab. Yet the radical diffe
outweighs by far the resemblance. Mendelsso
purely deistic perspective of sweet reasonablene
lacking this nuance but, primarily, he invok
of kabbalistic symbolism with which the Div
(miSwot) in particular had been invested. All
restoration found in the Tora are made to s
ultimate salvation: The miswd of returning lost

abhedd); the laws of shemit.td and the Jubilee y


of the leper; of the cleansing of the house
had been pronounced; all these and other com
the character of expressing in so many ways th
the eventual return of all things to God. Eso
dimension to Halakha and, at the same time,
tional eschatology of eternal punishment to
new message. If Morteira felt to be on sure
took his stand on the terra firma of the classic
Aboab preferred to soar into the realms of k
happened to resound also with echoes of kin
contemporary world at large.

80 See Gershom Scholem, Einige kabbalistische Hands


Museum (Jerusalem, 1932), p. 28 f.; Idem, Von der m
Gottheit (Ziirich, 1962), p. 223.
81 See my Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Stud
Alabama Press, University, Alabama, 1973), index s. v.
attempt at reconciling Enlightenment sentiment with
of hell was made by Mendelssohn's friend Naftali
in his Ma'amar fIjlkckur Din (Berlin, 1786).

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
24 ALTMANN [24]

A synopsis of the doc


to bring the points o
crucial element in Mo
dorot - understood as
13:5) quoted with sligh
17a): "But the minim,
(gehinnom), and are pun
(le-dorey dorot), as it
upon the carcasses of
for their worm shall n
and they shall be an a
teira sees an equivalen
(Berakhot 28b), and, m
ment of karet after d
denied a "share" (helel
being condemned to s
equations are tacitly a
teachers of blessed me
for this simplex theory
rities. Leaving out of
the non-attainment of
quotes his paraphrase
punishment in Hilkho
lowing have no share in
lost and are being punis
of the greatness of t
term le-dorey dorot is

82 "Punished" (nidonin)
"Some Aspects of After L
Wolfson Jubilee Volume, E
note 57 (quoting his artic
83 Commentary on the M
Teshubha 8:1; 8:5. Maimon
Adam, Sha'ar Ha-Gemul (s

Moshe Ben Nalhman, Jer


Commentary on the Tora
Tora, Num. 15:22.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[25] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 25
u-le-'olemey 'olamim. At the same time eternal punishm
with both karet and exclusion from the world-to-com
was able to cite in support of his view even Nahman
"a great Kabbalist and hasid" (line 62). Although h
from Nahmanides' Sha'ar Ha-Gemul (lines 51-57) is
functory, he was unquestionably right in claiming h
Notwithstanding the fact that Nahmanides gave a
allegoristic, interpretation to the Talmudic passag
of those serving a twelve months term in hell,85 he le
ness of eternal punishment for the gravest categor
(ha-resha'im ha-gemurim ha-hamurim) unchanged. He
concept of unlimited sufferings in hell with that o
introduced a graded system of this form of retribu
is briefly mentioned by Morteira (lines 52-55; 57-
"great Kabbalist" quoted with obvious relish is Balh
who used the more philosophical term eonesh nibzi
coupled with the Talmudic phrase le-dorey dorot (l
Having established, to his own satisfaction, the authe
ing of the Talmudic phrase as denoting eternality
concilable with the new-fangled interpretation of it
a "limited time" (zeman mugbal), Morteira proceeded
the Talmudic passage containing that phrase had b
by Asher ben Yehiel in a systematized form arranging
grades of sinners under six heads; that Isaac Al-Fasi
it in its original form; and that Rabbenu Nissim had c
ruling, adding, however, Zerahya Ha-Levi's proviso tha
(teshubha) canceled the eternality of punishment. Reca
Karo's codificatory rule that a joint verdict by the thr
authorities, viz. Al-Fasi, Maimonides and Asher ben
be accepted as halakha, Morteira asserted the unassa
of the doctrine (lines 86-90). Strangely enough, he

84 The word obhedim ("are lost") may reflect the philosop


the death of the soul, which, however, is strangely out of tune
as noted by Nalimanides, loc. cit.
85 See Kitebhey, II, p. 288.
86 Kitebhey, II, p. 290.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
26 ALTMANN [26]
it had been recognized
Ha-Kodesh (completed in
had used the doctrine of
repentence had failed to
ner, God provided a chan
of transmigration (hese
tions was limited to thr
pared to admit the theor
Isaac Abrabanel had fou
"If in the end (i.e. after t
wicked will be finally cu
95-96). The text does n
quoted was added on by
rectly reported.88 In a
teach in public only wh
nounced. It was a "crimi
traditionally received w
ment "All Israelites have a share in the world-to-come" could not
be regarded as an unconditional "absolute verdict" (ke-gezera
muhletet). The term "Israelite" was synonymous with "righteous"
?(addit), as Isaac 'Arima had declared (lines 99-103). Joseph Albo
had, moreover, distinctly upheld the notion of eternal punishment
in the case of those who denied the (Divinity of the) Tora and
the principles (ha-'ikkarim) of the Faith (lines 103-106).89
One should not be misled, Morteira pointed out, by what seemed
to be a dissenting view on the part of Isaac Abrabanel in his
Commentary on the Tora (parashat shelah lekha), where he spoke
of various degrees of the punishment of karet in opposition to the
views held by Nahmanides and others and declared that in the end
the soul would receive the bliss of the next world. According to
Morteira, Abrabanel was dealing here exclusively with the special
punishment of karet,90 and not with the retribution meted out to

87 See note 47 to Text A.


88 See note 46 to Text A.
89 See note 49 to Text A.
90 "Special," that is, according to Abrabanel, while Morteira, following

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[271 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 27
the grave sinners listed in the rabbinic sources
demned to stay in hell eternally. Morteira took
show that in other works of his Abrabanel recognize
that certain offences entailed the loss of 'olam h
the passage from the end of Rosh Amand which
phrase le-dorey dorot in Rosh Ha-Shand 17a as pro
trine, thus implicitly identifying eternal hell with
of a share in the world-to-come (lines 103-129). H
any possible misconception of Abrabanel's position
with a sense of relief and, no doubt, special satisfact
traditional view held by his opponent's famous
Aboab I, in his Menorat Ha-Ma'or, and he thre
measure, an equally orthodox expression of opini
Jonah Gerondi in his Sha'arey Teshubha (lines 12
Kabbalist, Menahem Recanati, was added to the li
not realize that the passages which he quoted fr
Commentary on the Tora as well as the text cited by
Sefer Ma'amar Ha-Sekhel91l (lines 147-160) were in
from Nahmanides. He brought his marshaling of
kabbalistic sources to an impressive climax by ad
sages from the Midrash Ha-Ne'elam and one from th
he had found in Elijah de Vidas' Re'shit Hokhma
These passages reflect the graphic descriptions of
partments of hell in old midrashic material whi
earliest Christian and Islamic texts on the sub
exercized a great deal of fascination on the relig
of Jews and non-Jews alike. The passage from Midra
on Ruth quoted by de Vidas and rperoduced by M
those sinners who are listed in Rosh Ha-Shand 17a
cend into hell and never rise up again, while of a
it is said, "He bringeth down to She'ol and bringe

Nalhmanides, identified karet in its gravest form with eter


hell and loss of 'olam ha-ba'.
91 On this work see note 75 to Text A.
92 See Saul Lieberman, 'Al Iata'im we-'Onesham, in: Sefer Ha- Yobhel Li-
Khebhod Levi Ginzberg, Hebrew Section i, New York, 5706/1946, p. 249 ff.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
28 ALTMANN [28]
2:6). The term She'ol des
hell. Of those condemne

called ere?
thither nevertah.tit, the(ha-yored
rises again" strikingsham
phrase is eyno
shubh used:eoleh),
"He whowhichdescends
sounds like Dante's "All hope abandon, ye who enter here" (Divine
Comedy, Inferno, 3:9). In proudly reviewing his array of authori-
tative sources Morteira felt that he had put up an invincible case.
The method by which Aboab's Nishmat IHayyim (Text C) sought
to demolish the solid arguments presented by his adversary may
be characterized by the dialectical pattern of "Yes, but." It would
have been futile to make a frontal attack upon what, unques-
tionably, was the established doctrine. He, therefore, frankly ad-
mitted that the overt meaning of the texts quoted was in favor
of the eternalist position. He denied, however, that this was the
end of the story. As a Kabbalist, he claimed to know certain
truths of an esoteric nature which put an entirely new and dif-
ferent complexion on things. If those truths had been withheld
from the uninitiated in the past, this was perfectly understandable,
but it was now imperative to disabuse people's minds of concepts
of God which were contrary to his justice and mercy. To under-
stand the texts literally was to ignore their inner soul which only
Kabbala revealed.93 Divulging the full esoteric truth in these mat-
ters did not imply any departure from the classical rabbinic texts.
It only meant casting light on their hidden meaning. For the
words of the rabbis (razal), the Zohar, and the Kabbalists stemmed
from one and the same source (4 3, 49-50). Our synopsis will
show how Aboab applied this principle in detail.
At the very commencement of his discussion Aboab stated his
fundamental belief that "all souls will be refined and purified in
the end of days," a belief founded, as he put it, on the kabbalistic
understanding of the rabbinic haggadot (# 1, 18-21). From the
vantage point of this firm conviction he could afford to make
a direct attack on Maimonides' (and, as he mistakenly assumed,

93 See Text C, #3, lines 6-7; 50-53 (previous esotericism); #8, lines 35-
37 (need for divulging the truth).

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[29] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 29

Albo's) position which identified the punish


the non-attainment of the soul's survival afte
The motley assemblage of authors asserting t
of the human soul (Me'ir ibn Gabbai; Tar
'Uzi'el; Solomon ibn Gabirol) need not detain
that Maimonides' affirmation of eternal pun
sins contradicted his theory of the death of
not new. It had already been made by Nahma
Morteira undoubtedly took it. The only nove
tempt to refute Maimonides by pointing out
the "reproaches and everlasting abhorrence"
12:2 and Isaiah 66:24 could refer to the body alo
rection (as had indeed been suggested in Abra
on Isaiah ad. loc.), in which case, however, t
the everlasting punishment of the soul made
was wrong. Besides, Abrabanel had denied th
with eternal punishment of the soul, and (co
contention95) had not stipulated that the gr
the rabbis were in a special category and lia
ment.96 There was, at any rate, little point in d
of philosophizing Jews who accepted Aristotle's
as a "mere disposition."97
Turning from the philosophers to the Kabbali
a great deal of attention in the first place to
view had been critized, and wrongly identifie
in Abrabanel's review of the various interpr
karet (# 2, 1-9). He quoted Nahmanides' utte
Ha-Gemul at some length and made it prefec
repudiated the notion of the soul's annihilation
any circumstances (* 2, 9-47). He conceded

punishment of the worst offenders was con


94 Kitebhey, II, 291.
95 Text A, lines 103-129.
96 We have emendated the text (line 51)by reading: u-m

otam asher manu h.akhamim. Otherwise, the text mak


97 Text C, # 1, 54-55; see note 29 ad loc.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
30 ALTMANN [30]
had stated the eternalist
not unduly perturbed b
although his words may
ment meted out to the p

is eternal
variably (niS.F),
adopted the this is not the
phraseology view
of our he actually
rabbis, of blessedheld. For he in-
memory,
from which one may infer that punishment is eternal, as they said
in the tractate Rosh Ha-Shand (17a), 'and they are punished there
le-dorey dorot'. Yet God forbid that they (sc. the rabbis) should
have assigned to the soul a punishment whereby she will not
'return to her Father's house as in her youth'. The term le-dorey
dorot denotes a limited time (zeman mugbal), which may be shorter
or longer according to the severity of the sin committed, as I am
going to show with God's help" (# 2, 48-53). The rabbinic phrase
could not possibly mean anything else, Aboab explained, because
of God's mercy by which "He devised means that one that is
banished be not an outcast from Him" (2 Sam. 14:14). The words
of the woman of Tekoa recorded in this verse had become the
favorite proof-text of the Kabbalists for the doctrine of trans-
migration (gilgul; eibbur). They were understood to mean that
through reincarnation God gave sinners and imperfect men a
chance of purification. If Nahmanides' discussion of reward and
punishment in his Sha'ar Ha-Gemul was silent on this aspect of
human destiny, it was due to the fact that in this (exoteric) con-
text he did not wish to touch on the subject of metempsychosis.98
As to Nahmanides' adherence to the view that transmigration was

a means
be of the
no doubt, soul's
Aboab restoration
suggested. For to
weintegrity (tikcc.un) of
had the testimony there could

98 Aboab was right in saying that Nalbmanides treated the "mystery of


transmigration" (sod ha-'ibbur) with the utmost reticence. This was true of
the Jewish mystics of Gerona in general. See Gershom Scholem, Le-Ifeker
Torat Ha-Gilgul Ba-Kabbala Ba-Me'd Ha-Shelosh 'Esre, in: Tarbi.z, 16 (5705/
1944-45), p. 135 ff. Nalimanides mentioned it, nevertheless, in his Torat Ha-
Adam (Kitebhey, II, 275); in his Commentary on the Tora (Gen. 38:8; 46:12;
Ex. 21:10; Lev. 18:6; 26:11); and, above all, in his Commentary on Job, where
the theme assumes central significance.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[31] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 31

Menahem Recanati to this effect. The passage qu


is the same which Morteira had adduced to pro
maintained the eternality of punishment. Mort
note, however, that Recanati was merely reproduc
opinion, and he had omitted the final sentence
the testimony considered vital by Aboab: "But
rabh, i.e. Nahmanides) has written that accordin

of transmigration
Nahmanides there is
passage referred to aby
tik.un to is
Recanati this
fou
Ha-Gemul,100 where it is said in more general
already alluded to the fact that there is a tilkkun
tions..." which Recanati took to imply a referen
'ibbur, although this term is not distinctly mentio
was, therefore, on somewhat shaky ground when h
tion of Nahmanides' doctrine of tiFkun through g
ticular "testimony" by Recanati (# 2, 60-73). H
Nahmanides' allusion to the "great mystery" to
30:2 is hardly more convincing, since nothing is
gives a clue to the doctrine of the eventual pu
souls, including those condemned to eternal pu
It is only some of the Kabbalists (Recanati and
who read the notion of a general restitutio in in
of transmigration into the Nahmanides text. It is
Bahya ben Asher, one of the three kabbalistic in
text in question (# 2, 73-80) had this particular
Nevertheless, Aboab felt justified in drawing def
as to Nahmanides' position: "Thus unto thee it
thou mightest know that the sod ha-?ibbur was no
for the Master (sc. Nahmanides) as far as tikun
and after the tenor of these words He made a covenant with all
souls of the house of Jacob that they have a share in the world-
to-come, as we shall explain" (# 3, 1-3). In view of the fact that
this view was shared by Menahem Recanati, the teims "no share

99 I.e. the question why the punishment of karet is sometimes not applied.
1oo Kitebhey, II, p. 291.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
32 ALTMANN [32]
in 'olam ha-ba"' and "b
dicated a state of thin
redress through transm
refrained from revealin
Yet there was a "comp
reincarnations, the num
times but could reach
the Sefer Bahir (# 3, 3
instrumental in bringing
and that the completion
the coming of the Messi
Kabbalists as Me'ir ibn
Zimra (# 3, 14-25). Abo
authority than the Zohar
Tora, Rabbi Shime'on b
a passage in which, he
no account denote eter
"limited time" (zeman m
tion that the sod ha-tic
to what would otherw
buttressed this rather
ibn Abi Zimra's Mem
veritable quarry for th
the traditional view of e
not considered as the f
means that one that is
He imposes upon him tra
ahar temura) ...and aft
him from one rung to
until he assumes again
ning" (# 3, 33-45).101 A
borative evidence for t

101 For the Kabbalistic doc


of existence see Gershom S
der Seelen," Von der mystis

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[33] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 33
doctrine by the theory of ti#kun in Isaac Luria's Sefer H
wanot (# 3, 43-47). He concluded this part of his treatise wit
sweeping statement: "There is no doubt that the words
Zohar and the words of our rabbis, of blessed memory,
words of the Kabbalists, peace be upon them, are all hew
one rock... and that the term le-dorey dorot denotes a
time, not eternal punishment..." (# 3, 49-53).
Having answered the first part of the she'eld posed at the
ning of his responsum, Aboab now applied himself to the
"What did the rabbis mean by saying, 'The following h
share in the world-to-come' ?" Morteira identified eternal pu
ment in hell with having forfeited one's portion in the "o
ba'. Not so Aboab. He offered two possible interpretations
latter phrase. According to the first, it means to say that th
of the sinner will not be resurrected in the eschatological
colam ha-ba' denoting the period of resurrection (eolam ha-t
The fate of the soul is of an entirely different order. Her u
bliss is assured through the purifying effect of transmi
According to the second interpretation, 'olam ha-ba' is th
of souls in the hereafter, following death, and having n
(helek) in it does not signify the exclusion of the sinner's so
this realm altogether. It merely means that whereas the righ
have their own special - one might say, private - compa
therein, the sinners are placed together and live in comm
we might say. The second interpretation is put forward only
the first has been discussed at considerable length (# 3,
The resurrection of the body, Aboab points out, spells th
pletion in physical terms of the completion of the spiritual
of the soul, and the soul which has achieved perfection
united with that body in which she acquired her integri
intermediate bodies in which she lodged during her many
tions had not been created in vain, for they provided opport
for improving the soul's quality. Aboab mentioned in th
nection the difference between gilgul and 'ibbur, promising
plain the distinction later, which he forgot, however, to
obviously meant to say that in certain cases only spark

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
34 ALTMANN [341
soul, not the totality of h
body (# 3, 55-67).102
Aboab found proof for th
the kabbalistic tradition
Joseph will be a reincarna
of Nebhat. How could such a view be reconciled with the rabbinic
statement which denied Jeroboam a share in the world-to-come
unless it was understood to mean that the body of this man would
not be resurrected, without denying that his soul would be purified
and thereby become worthy of Messianic rank? (# 3, 68-72). A
clear utterance expressing precisely the same view was quoted by
Aboab from Samuel de Uceda's commentary on Pirkey Abhot
(Midrash Shemu'el).103 There it was argued that the phrase "The
following have no share in the world-to-come" could only mean
that their bodies will not be resurrected because the Talmud dis-
tinctly said: "He denied the resurrection of the dead; therefore
he shall have no share in the resurrection of the dead." At the
same time, de Uceda stressed the availability of the soul's redress
through the purifying effect of transmigrations (# 3, 73-84). Aboab
found support for his interpretation also in "two pillars," viz. the
Zohar and Cordovero's Pardes Rimonim. From the Zohar passage
he skillfully distilled the theory that the original bodies of those
who denied the Divine origin of the Tora and the resurrection and
of those who denied the existence and unity of God would not
rise again; that other bodies would be built in their stead (in
which the soul could lodge during her peregrinations); yet that
even a single miSwad done was sufficient to secure resurrection. In
other words, he tried to prove that the Zohar too understood the
Mishnaic statement about those who had no share in 'olam ha-
ba' as bearing on the fate of the body at the time of resurrection,

102 On the difference between gilgul and 'ibbur see Scholem, loc. cit., 219
ff. Cf. Emanu'el I;Iay Riki, Sefer Mishnat Iasidim (Lemberg, 1858), fol.
43a-45a.
103 Samuel ben Isaac de Uceda (1540-?), a native of Safed, was a disciple
of Isaac Luria and HIayyim Vital. See Me'ir Benayahu, Sefer Toledot Ha-'Ari,
Jerusalem, 1967, p. 177 f. et passim.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[35] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 35

and not on the destiny of the soul (# 3, 84-100)


passage Aboab could similarly find confirmation
between the final damnation of the sinner's bod
remedy of the ills of the soul (4 3, 100-105)
number of further proof-texts and argumen
significantly add to what he has said already in
No. 1 '(4: 3, 105-156).
Next on the agenda is theory No. 2 accordi
phrase "no share in the world-to-come" only
ner's soul will have no special place allotted
after. Aboab found support for this rather le
in a number of kabbalistic texts which elab

midrashic
paradise notion thatwith
in accordance every
the .saddit. hastohis
honor due own
him; compartment in
moreover,
that even those who have no merit whatsoever receive a measure
of bliss from the gracious bounty of God.104 Ezra ben Solomon
of Gerona (whose unpublished Commentary on the Aggadot was
unknown to Aboab) had stated:o105 "You will find in many places
that the rabbis, of blessed memory, said, 'He has no share in the
world-to-come', meaning thereby: He has no free place (pena'i)
to himself nor any treasure at his disposal and under his control...
and one who has no merit stands in a place where many others
stand." Bahya ben Asher and Abraham ben Yehuda Elimelekh,
the compiler of the work Likkutey Shikhehad U-Fe'd, quoted this
passage, and Aboab drew on their quotations. He also mentioned
the use made of the original haggadic motif by the Zohar HIadash
and by Menahem Recanati in his Commentary on the Tora (# 4,
1-15).106 He even went so far as to suggest that the restriction of

104 See note 90 to the text (#4, 10).


105 See Efrayim Gottlieb, Ha-t(abbala Be-Kitebhey Rabbenu Behay Ben Asher
(Jerusalem, 5730/1970), p. 54.
106 Bahya ben Asher's position is not entirely clear. Morteira had under-
stood him to affirm the eternality of punishment, and this interpretation would

seem to be correct. There is, however, a certain ambiguity in Bahl.ya's discussion


of the theme (at the end of parashat aharey mot) in that he appears to suggest
that even sinners condemned to eternal punishment in hell not only enjoy
rest from their afflictions on Sabbaths and festivals but also eventually gain

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
36 ALTMANN [36]

the souls of sinners to


the pre-restoration peri
gilgul was completed.
of Jacob would be reh
"become straight." He
R. Joshua ben Levi's d
various "houses" and
etc.), his intention ob
various compartments
(# 4, 16-29).
Although convinced
Aboab felt it advisable
gument (pilpul). What
of the eventual tiitun o
of the kabbalistic notion of the return of all souls to God at the
time of the Great Jubilee (ha-shabbat ha-gadol). The authorities
quoted by him as spokesmen for this concept are the "holy"
author of the Sefer Ha-Kand; David ibn Abi Zimra (in both his
Magen David and Mepudat David); Moses Alshekh; and the Zohar
(4 5, 1-23). He also deemed it necessary to clarify the meaning
of the Biblical verses Isa. 66:24 and Daniel 12:2, which Morteira
had considered unquestionable proof-texts for the doctrine of eter-
nal punishment. In Aboab's view they did not refer to the punish-
ment of either soul or body but to an eschatological event, i.e.
the display of the dead bodies of grave sinners - or, possibly, of
bodies resurrected for the occasion but endowed only with "vital
spirits," not souls - in order to make an example of the dishonor
of the wicked, as happened in the case of Zedekiah and Ahab
admittance to paradise, though being denied compartments of their own.
Another difficulty concerns the identity of "Rabbi Abraham" against whom
(and Maimonides) Babya ben Asher argues for the survival of all souls. If
the reading "Rabbi Abraham" is due to a scribal error (mistaking Ezra ben
Solomon for Abraham ibn Ezra), as Gottlieb, loc. cit., p. 39 suggests, there
would be a contradiction in Ezra ben Solomon: On the one hand, he would
share Maimonides' view that karet means the destruction of the soul. On the
other hand, he would maintain that all sinners are eventually given some place
in paradise.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[371 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 37

(Jer. 29:22). This would serve as a "reproach and


ever, not that the fire would burn for ever. As Abo
his interpretation agreed with the way in which
KIimhi, and other commentators had understood
also conformed to Abrabanel's view as expressed
tary on Isaiah and in his discussion of the meaning
tioned before. Yet even on the assumption that
described the punishment meted out to body and so
tion would come to an end with the termination of the sixth
millenium when all souls would have completed their purification
and when their "return" (teshubha) to God would arouse God's
forgiveness of past sins (# 5, 24-68). Finally, Aboab referred to
a Zohar passage1o7 according to which the word dera'on is to be
understood as an expression of repentence on the part of the sin-
ners, meaning: dai re'iya da' ("we have seen enough"). He added
that in Targum Jonathan's rendition of dera'on (Isa. 66:24) the
same pun carries a different meaning: It is the Saddilcim who say,
"We have seen enough" (misat hazina'), and by their pronounce-
ment put a stop to the sufferings of the sinners in hell. As Aboab
recalls, the Zohar knows the descent of the righteous into hell in
order to cause the wicked to repent and rise again (# 5, 68-73).108
Summing up, Aboab enunciates the following four principles as
guideposts for the interpretation of rabbinic passages dealing with
the subject under consideration (4 5, 74-75). (1) The locus clas-
sicus (Rosh Ha-Shand 17a) does by no means indicate the destruc-
tion of the souls of sinners, as might appear from the description
of the fate of those condemned to stay in hell for twelve months.
The words, "After twelve months their bodies are wasted away,
their soul is burnt, and a wind (ruab) scatters thent under the feet
of the righteous" have to be allegorically understood. 109 "Under the

107 See note 47 to the text.


108 See note 48 and the text # 5, 77-81; 91-93.
109 Aboab does not use the term "allegorical" but this is the gist of his
interpretation, which is modeled on Nahlmanides' (see # 2, 25-47). He in-
troduces a fresh nuance by adding the motif of the active help rendered by
the righteous.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
38 1ALTMANN [38]
feet of the righteous" me
of the righteous who raise
which the same Talmudi
the worst offenders, does
In a similar way, the rab
serve him for ever (le-'o
Jubilee year. The expiess
Messianic era in which "O
generation cometh" (Eccl
to mean: The generation
the cycle of transmigratio
of David arrives. Then al
need of returning to ear
"They go down (into hell
is: They shall not rise (by
the righteous who go down
recalls in this connection
which depicts the openin
in hell who respond to the
"They have no share in t
in one of the two ways su
the ultimate admission o
in question. Aboab mentio
that after the cessation of
no more proselytes will
room whatever for the e
maining sections ( # 6-8) o
aspect that has not been
as matters of historical i
final section of the text pr
Disclaiming his opponen
Aboab wrote: "Moreover
the Kabbalists without un

110 See note 58 to the text a


Tolerance and the Jewish Trad

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[39] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 39

said, 'All say what they know but not all know
(# 8, 17-19), the implication being: Morteira say
while I know what I say. Who was the "wise m
remark is cited here? It is tempting to relate
to an anecdote which is mentioned by many h
the only source of which is Johann Christoph
Hebraea (III, 709). The story is that Antonio V
Jesuit preacher and Portuguese diplomat, when on
to Holland, went to hear Menasseh ben Israel
preach, and when asked for his opinion about
merits gave the following reply: "Menasseh ben
he knows, while Aboab knows what he says."1
true, it must have been widely discussed at the tim
seem most likely that Aboab alluded to it in th
quoted, substituting, however, Morteira for Me
He would have been able to take it for grante
understood who the "wise man" was, and enjoye
tation. Yet there is a chronological difficulty w
been unable to resolve. According to his own ac
to him),113 Vieira had several discussions with
and Menasseh ben Israel in particular during hi
when on diplomatic missions in the years 1640 and
on the other hand, that he could not have visite
because he was in Brazil at the time, delivering
bolster the morale of the Portuguese in their st
Dutch. It was only in 1646 and 1648 that he we
King Joao IV to Holland,114 and established co

111 Heinrich Graetz, Geschichte der Juden, X (2nd ed


Keur van Grafsteenen, I, p. 72; L6wenstein, "Die Fam
note 2; Cecil Roth, A Life Gf Menasseh Ben Israel, p. 1
112 Menassen dicere, quae sciat, Aboabum scire quae dica
113 J. Lficio d'Azevedo (ed.), Cartas do Padre Antdnio V
1928), p. 781 f.; cf. Cecil Roth, A Life of Menasseh B
note 29.

114 See J. J. van den Besselaar, Ant6nio Vieira en Holland (1624-1649), (Nij-
megen-Utrecht 1967), pp. 8, 12, 14 f. No dates are given by J. Lticio d'Azevedo,
Histdria de Antdnio Vieira (Segunda Edirgo), I, (Lisboa 1931), pp., 139-141.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
40 ALTMANN [40]
Jews. 1640, the date given
1646. Now since he did not
that Aboab was absent from
until he returned in 1654
sermons with those of Me
It is not known whether h
completion of his nine yea
the Amazon delta. Hence
Israel and Morteira whose
he listened to Morteila's pr
of the fact that he tried u
logical disputation.116 The
garbled account of what a
referred to in Aboab's Nishm
Vieira. Even assuming that
1654 and before Menasseh ben Israel's death in 1657 Vieira had
an opportunity of hearing both, the fact that the treatise was
written as early as 1636 and copied in 1648 precludes the pos-
sibility that Aboab was quoting Vieira. Who the "wise man" was
who anticipated the Jesuit's remark remains a riddle.

115 See note 113.


116 Roth, loc. cit., 163 f.; d'Azevedo, Histdria, p. 140 f.

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[41] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 41
TEXT A

I If t7y11i ft21r

- ?nS$ tt21ru3 1093~ NY 19801 P 19800 0971~~ '=I11n0 (MIl$ H'19


02329 '9N D'KN 'TkN 10 lfl8 rfIz DnNk1 'i D'1 rN fl1l0 K1<'i7)
If 1 3 lii WW1' 3P 0 11 '1 1Vt 179 W 2 1 l f1 =3 w l 7 WI7W
f1t Vt$ '7W4 $N?ltt lm 11 fNl1 mi *on min eI 3fl1j 13? my

19 j 1nK6 1f1Y 15W1 81'11 1 f'nll 7 lR211n s1'Ifplrs "1p1; V 1


11'10 Vtffl 113V4 nmu 9 m IrmN nlt# 1rub ftivx -'*11 mimm: -s mitrin

vol ?xfivo ?n 1vi aon1 3 N lamm ' z11 9 trit ]ftil two nx ?16a' sg 8 m1 1
raftNz1 1i9om ??jm1 Ispmmi til x1 moili g3 m1 lo.NSW m91y9 -fn m
nx am onT1 rmi Ni m 8N? ' ovIo ri 1 12 imm1 muiY m])i 11 ;g* ;n?m
01Wt t 14 1*71, '111t) '8 * ' NW t 1i ' X? a'in tfj3;@'T j Yawn 1t 1317Tin ml-1
tri-imium m*,izv* -or nirn rimso, rittvi m*Dwn i~ ,w aw i3?iyn ift 1om

6.t2.t 7*34 Nl 3Y I }151(' 7 1974 a r31y 9 .rrnv ib rinvi 01 T' 0rm% '1 1
?WIW'9 L3= n?21i/PW nM13N1t "242Y -1'1? RZ 131` V-1.1 031,1 @Tl ol
.11"D;I' N11611 012ftia l $irnm $N t17 ",tjW;l WttK'ft w zn itiorion r'2iatii mNr' lin
13111 1"7 13M V1 112% 41VIO 171VIDI 13t13110il rmi 1 i 3 11"2 1 Ill0= 1010DW

.3 ,K 1DN lK

.t ,fl WW' b

.2 : ,l 12 s
.1r , 1' 11201 6
. ,=? MV 7
.Nt-m ,N ' tWn ): 8
."' ,k 6"1:12t 9

.t1 ,0 1'612 ' 11

.. ,1 TrlD ; lt
t ,T 1#41" 12
,-1 12?32 13

.An , S irryl is

Y'1 ,t t S 17
.1,1~' }lst83 KNbDln ; N ,T 8-1 17

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
42 ALTMANN [42]

71,11, in$ Y. 1419 71AD 1310


2 ''f 1jyVEo*" t)"NV' "llon 'M
N13 71- D 131"R 311 1, m
-11" 1 "T DDuin 7t }1

l11 niml 7'll DNTll 821BNf

5538 1'11DR' 11311 ;r09 17


t13 1839 D~t N ;I90' Ttt#
Olt= Insv .11H 11 1,I
Ti~ zoD'in 2=I$ nlrtt) .
2000 1 0 Di 99309 18
W3A14,111 , lb 1*1XI mrr l 38 3 } .in ND "z1 109 03 yl X ft)WX t33,ni 3 01
D$1 IDpW iY A"InIN 4S4%?n 13%J-1 In 0 21,t3%Vjftj iND 11011 X
D3 IDT71? r673 1".1t'3W1 ChINXI PlJlrjl Vl 22, 11Y l7llrrll nivirb r1b
mra1 tullit t~wh wl flylv. I I'My Dl TV11 71 13M V A131 N -9 0i1
113D 713"YV rmi tln 23,jjyj %VIV 131 -b N2Y XWX MR2N2S '"- '1nX XWI 35
m mArion ?innimlNla 1y 4D 7 24.fftry jfftVnW;) 7'I1 -wy1t f1n 121311 MVY
nW1Da n~ 902~n3 tf1'0 87 818 P'SYI tN imltn 2018r ip'BSD l}018 t$U NA;
9 X- i 01 "J IDN3 '7kt'101 PAll?= 'iln'l r-1131 ?Wnn 1-11- .'11 25 1ot

in -,= 13DW11 1IN Sa@ 0X 13?W? X",-I MI-"Y271 'in 7DIRM .90nll rl1'9 VXNWl 40

,Inn .111 Vl? *1110-,W .1'". RAl-"Ir 7n ;r1RND1 - 31 .711 .39011? Allj?*r
n1"'1 *101i2-1 l ?IY 67110-1 RnADII) DI 1mmwv Dolm -1?31 jip~ p10o 11bNW

UNI -1 110 It 1SX10 N Z3101# DN j t91 n 0 ty0 19?jj tY 0D13 t3N 27 nirfyl

.In ,A11 1172) 18


.1w ,mn m-17in 19
.n, ,Un 0913n 20
.In ,It 1S41710 21

.11 ,=' ~N"I 22

.t,-r I' ,) nN,, 23


." ,Ir ,~1" 24

"NW ,I l12= ;j ,lt2 7"611gt0 ; 0 ,US ='"1711t Hrl01 26 ..X ,~, Y.I'. 25
nn ,Ill n131 27

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[43] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 43

rxN rnrvi -0 28 1i67n '-om imini 1ri Im l'on1 thv m


D;I'D 5Y SUN D'2~~1N;I 09181 .WN~1' 18 '5' 1;1531 ;I29
13411t) # am;1 80,2161mcm m8 v .w1) 8 -7n v* qi1@ 1vn

milm0 mhit7 -.1 '0 01 'DSrT fri"T in " vi wtit i ioN ? m1

?.Tll ?v 1"316 .131 Z "bTnlxW 1-vini ift )tSri mr


29 -1ni Ifnlg 91)311"ID9D1 l'ol-lip"Dwrl 13"7* 91v 10 1 mD
nnit tnin -Tr1 15111 ~'xmfi n N m trin VI mt w V wi m~w ?iw
"#ION rjr tj IV D 31 0 'rn rl10 laftv 'll bi146 19n
137,11 M?IY? t334,'3 I7D21 T"HXMV aw 1Y 711 M" in -731 *
001ru5 j1 irbl$ 74ttv *Lxi nmr trn nTi tw 1*x pin tl
1'9ttV ?nW Yj ?n 7'nZ 711tnn11 32 -n1l11 T1it ftr 1 3
txD .0 n uily ?, "-- np-ly 1?nn irn1iv i 7,4.n n 93
jj7n 611Stt rj W1 1 33 ra 61*11N ?'On I'l "T 1'1 7, 1 7D"I
nl0r 30 100~f 1013 0#1 ?T3 '8 1 MT 13 C1~3Nf N'I828 #181 1031X 1011$13
xviv 1%i1n nn"ri fTAh, T"y 35 IV s Tl 34 -I -jaly kt4,f- jt9@WD@ riti
-?r 1* 7,im1 thizinn mvin =13N XIW 36P3IW as . t rivir '121 1117 3"8' 60
1in a81* 1"Nis 12 1* rian T y 71 119i ftl7D r 97 l "DSN1 .3"E m";D"
t-ror ?i-u ?mp ""381n 911 37. lnktj-fW 1nn tftKiv mnin zllin
00n17 ?D )D *189081 ?2h 9 1 4 kt; t ANV ND 133;'73=1? 11= n01
5311m vinn in1 31 r1 n11inmm tTN ninwrin iwl ixtivxm r at 1it
NmW rinw nin ynl-Sin ni n" ' M1 41n 'D lion In 1 m lln 5nt r165
n1l2th W702 -117l3i ftiItSP 0111 1t3l *4=23 1tN 1l33-1 NMl-2 N1 -inlvzi
8081 D 4'171 Wly- IV910 39 ' Wl1rb V IN'l ftll?3'11a =6S1 In I32 112YA"12
XN? 013? 3P 7,7311NIJ 74V1 1111 "-111 13V J"211'13 11131t 'if 6173 -1 ?n
1031372 1DS 3 Db M liMMI "On .$"In rnwnuT sviia* mirm Vw1m wi7n
?nlln 77t2 xitv 187112mv mo11? 41?*T ) T lwl3 1-21 *X 0111'1? 70

OR ,mD Mot10 ;IN ,l, 1"6#1t)D 28


.1 ,1 ;l21h 'rf 29
'D- ,67:t) Vn9711* ,2 "jit ,(mw11v r1r in0 1-in fw 1nio193) t"vin mnm so
.21
.i"vn ="Ann 61117"0 31

.0731 'jDW ,i tV 32

IUD ,in NM11674 33


.X I ,to9 1-1022 34
,O 1 ,2; ,21911-P0 ; n~t V 4- b) 35
.11 , ij 214H DW 36
.'71101 19tU3:VZ U'iS "1 37

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
44 ALTMANN [44]

vri u 1in n'alm'1n


f3 znth1n o2flu fl't11ain
01,11W Mf TSg 'N .It "8
t2sl'ml 52= pt71l nha1ir
tlmg'n1Y 5nm w e# '1-7u1
n121131V 7111'T . 7 9171 ]'
;1a lM'xl1l Dx'IX tAY J Tls
'inm Si11 'I ."i K Oi. 42:m
2 7 14721 DW. OK *1'f3 '4
nim0 nrm pi0 nt m111ni

(21731 02DXI~7 ik u~r


aa 1
1200 Xl171 1 ZW 0
1r71orom T }"1 n .0mb
x~ rnr T pr T iri b 2zT
viN ftniWm z"# .t"ain ,4o

.I8997 "f, j 1 y '11 N "DY


.13;141?17 tv07 Iltsviv nIu
Dp0*2117n tf .1 0.9131 -It fI
vi1 laln nmwri mrivy 6 im
S12wJ ft jVnV Nt ?. Jb 45. D

onz0 'mt111* i n s ll '


,12i D~3
,g /90 39

2 ,1'2 lit }112' a Ii~t' ..N.E


.?v # t0 '1114

wDTr1 v (12, '"RS 3'n9- vli ,nin Nr1i ) n ' n -,vo r t ,Pr tv on 42
:(33 '12Y , "bln , - N ' 9 l'fS?2yo' i 'l llm) l, 'on mipum Dimsmi NmmmND
.1 2lllP1 7 1" 1 Ig111 '1i1 ni n110mi vl-voirwri ?=m ... D mNt I-pri irn-
.mmvri mn trrimvvmDnl i m JD m Nv pi ... nilT 1-irr
h: P4 -0j tP ' -l iu'my1 "S "3 1o rn " IvWDVV' 1fRT-pi rip 019 '1 43
n" Im1 m" nim rmi 7 t Nb ...mINmm inow w1 n mtvmW n17mi 7- wu m -urno
;1ibi p1DD3 11111 DTY'~ a'0* 08 Di ' fl97 flVNtZ? n' n ' "t W"N;Ii

n , Inb ,l" rin NVON1,W 'I I ' 1N7 1' - '"' T7 jn- T1V27 1 " 44
.N ,T' I"i 45

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[45] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 45
nlP81D2 311 '8 1 7718Zt'lN 3"$ '3 110337 n"981 .'131 ;r3193
NX jol10n t1t 46 wl l131; V0 W t34 N $SDt ;Vo' JVk
?v ir?-mn 47i tsri 'i3 o"n v"lnn pw .-nn-ina t'ryw r
W1N'xll?3l~ P 120i --1 N2- 16t 1? r 3"?31 D"Am 7171n.9 '9
am-'l-mT nN vIom-,* itn1 '0 71Y1 4No7 ti mso1a?3 Tib
.1YV3 -mTripy ?Yl Dn 0 ,'-,I ni' M i ny-7 D 13 "
wi=x3 3"099 i 089 7' rmy7' 12 =*2* w-,90 ?tvv ziN ;
lkN 2"119 Yin 'Ift Wb JIM11 MIMC1 331 0 MT 1n1D P"?
0 01-11- ' ?3X Y= 't?' NW ?Dl D-T-i Ml 31 P 1" 1 1
'D ' N11DS N1 1 617= mli M D31 .y 31-m rfmy p 11f 7* lo
Vy193 0 3113 0 intD 13'nK 1'lnlt 13iy 1 W6171 VX n11Do ?"- 140
''11 0"YM XTV7 I=3 013-1211M ro-11D2 I-10DW 13111tt 0137 01 '3
rival-inn 7-3Y ? 1 n09 '31 w"n K"?,.,T t nrtl-vin mn
1mut1 -m1 mrlioin imtm wCoa11 W319 818 013? fN so:Lw
qr tW n13'r N s-t7w" r1 Xi 3t15 W?2n1 3 1y 8 n2II
Ntt01 nwD n??= ms-um =yz tft -irr 0 Dmv -l. " vui 0
&'D MIZ11 (1 1 7 2 134- 1rI t'7 ywo triton1 LW in t

$7,i .(a-v3 ,-z 'yr ) nn ?n 11N n o .3 7 It 17 m (7I-l :',


Tiv) aPr*l Ilin xt 811 piro x N1 099,?tiinnx'1 ' Z1 -=o m31 K
(299,297 '?3V; ,1=-viri 7n, ; 1 ,o1 ,M ,j"T fl -10j1 ,0K2 ? 1
I 1ifti, n' 00 ' 102 670- 17too 1 1vrni ,WoDW ?vm trim .-fi '31

,(2 mun 1- 1) "u17 2"3 11- 1n om111t K m1 (Jbx -TV n'7181m) I


.0129i 0Il 1 011 M21 I' 'I '110- '-nrim 1 K-21l V 'i 7
?I?In v'inD ut 3 03l": t ,1i13- 0112-T JI1111l ?V W ,IKVI-14
3'InD 'P HYD' 098 3 7I (1' 214H) -1 HO "'IMIM In2 1130
."-1I IV 1 X nit' W?W 1N M'nBD n "M ,"1D 'Il
.2 ,1 1 7 p , t i in ,12 17130M1, ,Ipn24 ' 1 ,NmN1Hn -
7- 1MH .336 '73 ,ntv - n irni n1 1mN1 ,1"W-h No'DlT , -Irvin t p

'I:) M7 17 HI"M-3 .(374 '-M) -is 00 nn mitr xvr,? -1-) ",r rirm
P'irr in b"t T3917- 1irrnNn r 1k vi ,insi t3tiv rr r1r1nn vvDaV vinn
"=- IIX Y-17 19381 981@ = Wih DM S -DB ,'1D 1 ? Inl -10=O1
14"12 13VIV Ni W o 1W 1 ,lrt"M i'T i m iinn I 1INviv 4IM-1 ,1ri1
-PV2 1"100 $ N ,0111 "lll }11-711 MiM-* 7"-T-11-1 t000% 7 i11 0N

.(378 '22) " 9-11# 91 3V1 070


.nnt,1u nnirin , v w1ro ,xNn21R pnx OMI
.W"31:'"n s 51

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
46 ALTMANN [461

rft23 1o03 3533 111'2


ri 311If t 'W1 3'13"IP1n J
trin o1 nll n itor vv Dt)"
If jIjVlyjj7 MVIW rj9DmtND

'r3 t}3y .3"2W9 2" alm 1 OSI-1 Z 1'721m43N 114 - '1 tt MAOI 73 3 1 3'?13 11), 117 5
m142 77 2 fu3 13 Intl I13,111u 7 3n 13 4:9"I 3A r I "-t 13- 9 1WR y 1 I371 N Dr WV2

PDWWW 113 31ll3 t N1 ;irnr1100 31' 0988 0 it 'ND 1817~ND 3131 00170~23~
Sn Ibt 13?' N1 333313 '310113' $#tU Yt~1323 310B ' 'h 8 3 '3'17117 D37l
v1 mln; N inr m 0i ron 0snnit i1ftym ml ; tb itib f1 .m"ar v"nIvr i 120
DEI1NT 3"A1 1,7 11 1 J 1 t1ipn 18701 A"I1VOI f131? 31 .)V 120
irnminin trn 0m ftina 1 trft n'nivnIi n N i rllit mr.-I I= Anin -1I1R
'610 .1NW ?Dx 172 HV1I1 .n"y 1"IT ftIvM D"YVI'Dbni 001no3l 001l t7N in

"jM 6 Nml-I- '1 mi 100it'1 Ilot t3V 1171 1n1lt= 1111-9M- 1-1,V 7I-1n17
Ntt1 naivin lown ir i 0 Nivy16-123= ?"? NW XV 1*1 I*t M293191" 125

3' DT7'1971121 =0,11900 W 11 ? I=lm i-"n 1Y'0 n ran m3l E I

lit?~ NY~D pmW 3ND 2111 D11 nf D (MT31 P'3019 P*711 '101 P1110bi
rnvp nivzv tunr ,-6 tat in, rrvi nif~trivi t~vp-gy trno -, -*mn rnInutll 3
Dt3 ftT 3 1J1I 1 olli C21K 1 VDI 112"67721 ?=tS 4TT *= D42117 t333V ?130

Do 07ra 99 Djv n nvin W9JW 010$triv troryp fn min 87orom

L$IX111 18# '5y


ann s' ITpnon
?11NDD~ nna 1138 TInonow
;1~ ' "71) $"T3818 " N'I
mnDtr~rv
.$ 133aim=
00D
?1*71'VfCiv
ft)?Zt 57 '&) ul &nlvn
8m ?2 7-1ml
1 ) A 19 1 W 3Ann= palnx
ItinNY 0 13-110Sw n 721

211 10$N 5 18 1 J "7T 6 "nr 0IfDt)YV 1 '1=191 DD'T -1114 114M135


it(31~ D$WAY~' P J;X TIfl' '131 ;171$311000 }*1)3t' D'nl~3" minittil
=m0 so~? It" ;rjT 83170Y 417 "t 0319 12 1 1P' 0081~l .'131 m111 "MT)L

1988I n'131N nzlnf t11'Dl 091 9"t ftlD5r f8 ;1 13 If~ W1Vl7' D nll 513#*(1 52
.NKO' m u,4" ??1w tj-1 2 , bmwit pnmy 1r ( 'i7 '1 9)5
.'r : "h1 s53

.J) ,;,5 TI ,T"jV flfln1 01n7 "Y Nlt31NK ,-jNjjn 1 ' s' 54
.2 ,n -7 13VC 55
.07 'D11) n0 ,t1tV 56

1,', ,kN ,NK - N ," 71 ,T"I 3 ; I102? ,(pk1f7) 0112 pisr '1' ?1kVZ1N f112ln 57
.011@17 a , ' 0 p,V1V1 S 51871
.'o{ '0 , WWWW 19W58

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[47] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 47

?Y 1 1"Dil, *n mrlft3 1train3 4i)171 'f '8 t1 4 1 I1.131ta j3' l j1 '3 '5
ron Di'Tm1Ni 'N/x vD 7,i= 11 riSxi ys ?y ftinm i DN rrm
1IVIV" 1D 1Wo l 'n 61'1fl1 Dl 7ntt IDN n rln miyr fnt 60#
7n j Vrjft? u p3,tuin 17 t 2t3WI1 0 I7n38 r3l 09n 8 62 TV 79

IlVt 1ft N 1 "Y 1nolul It I n'lll r1wrl 'in trainn


1p Oil ';r 2~l~ ;18 Di3 W'I8 71 "N' .3"y 2";1Y; 7a TKNl 1tD$ 8
rn31 a 181 '16 1 ,I110881 ?Mi X -N ,Y"147 WI"33 b"tnN

$itr P'931pa n 8 1013 K "T M~ 65N3R~s~ jP 03lj 3?1;1 .3"y DW


mnum a 'n1 1491' 17t fN t$18 - N) ?V ' 17137 'I1Y1 '10, 53
nn78n 134 ntuj'a13 n tli ?-"? 6ikW;? 1 33 ]8 011313 n1ol;1
'I lybT1 ftj8 wJ' tlr l 3 X11 I1 N V 1 nvlj)? 67D0 I7 '331 -" l 1unjlg
irm ?=1 Ins,, itpiv 10 inr 174-r mvt mitv mminm minalt imw
m,",-m p17 5r $ i *NW 1tN17 i 9"?1 13) 2 68,j"j;Y-lg ftmit r
1ID W** I -t 1 : n1X O1T1 69,,'I1D 0 lbYT 9130 1 010= 10
%;,, 421m nnbin x mivu ramimm 71: T =5 n 7 't t]ownin
im siry trimi vor, rrinn l m~ 331t3' 71-5-"? 15 n15V ?111 tl

.D ,t1'7 P 59
.,l ,n 0 61 st .1 i , 6t1WWW 60

.13to ,'Fill 1141 63 , .N i- 1jn 62


9y 00121 i~ni '83@v t 39 ...'J:' 82 :2 p,"l '100 .bn1029
f~ r3 ,=I = rN

wtrinn r OnnWii (l24,'? p ,njW) MD' 7n1 114 -'1 nmp in lK 12


DtVw1z fl l'YI nom msInh '7MD M-2 WIM "IT7 M18Wil (mton = "9) p
... I-DM -0o -inv iN zinm n 1i ninvin vnlnic
m0?ivi I-Tv 'ln 4-ilw itN xW 8it ' nN 92 1i i :-i1ri '711M
...,'iW #SH

171na Ilum -ivlv '13b-7mm ril-lin -'Om I~q~ ;1"411 rlPl .9tomip
.bibi 17 ,080 11I'CS "viivwzr oviiv in stS09i msNim 1
.:')-t~l:*

M11161
N' I; V~b~; 01, =r1000
innt21 0111=1 11inl
fIn 1$inIn * m mintl
1998 rviin424
9
on'l Jn" tw tbn 3't311(Vw' ( I1n ,t30) M1 W014n mn1 'An1H 11 M ,(1, ,m,2D m 4 )o

744 .Inull1 14-1mD vtv-l wa1. (,0 , 1 An -17 eMINtr , -i11 ar4P p-1
.a.1 I13 0a.
P"-17
.3 ,;1Y 71 ,n011{* 11N 0139 'D 71

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
48 ALTMANN [48]

11013 1 ;'l3l nnjllra V


In 143yn139 (10** 7
7s5 61?31tln$ X"'t 1t ?n7
D3AOW5 711 011 14P"I'M ll"

77 If3tflV
113#~~~~n~t 1T Vn
rivi"tui DW
,mm 7
NW

#1371ni blrifty Inn pirli

tft20 w11 DWt79 t 11 f

,10 In-=S , m"nhir linnv


Inn ,riNt r-r2i8- -n'iW11m
nr1n9 nbi;r liN MS~ PST flfl
VS11SW m1 t .3"Y .p20n -T 0
$N~Sb' pW ."t'l3bW0 Nn'9133
V18 71fl 132W mil i~nNf
v"v a-vi3 n-v3 nn"n mN tbwm

1'P 1Np n 7 n .9
.031mml-im mou b"v fipv
n813b 1"MV n13M $DB JW
(It-in msrm T-m III= ? -n'lntn
.(hn lutc t831~ 31"919P $"1 tf
.(9t~IV=1 19 rin 1 p ?vit) i
mm -*3UTinw unm 0vmvlmz
-71N7mv' pni a In v lm e -no
m$"l U107= 11SM 001 11 09
09121 tDsWWtW ;1 USE37110
1,M12 ;u T-I

,I~op a~~~u~rlj ,p~mt~r ?h

pvWo m1 pmWr 01-94 01v

Invn =Sprl.}"3819 m1o3= 100


nh~pn ,S~~t~ 901 N08 11n3
.19-18 'ru ,Inw
19wv) nmn t," tTntWvn,vN
'7-7111 12HO (IV ,1 IM 1 4 b
... Inp~m
plowb ny 990 1 3 NSB2
.2 1,-P 74-1-71-1D 61
. ,It n M-1
-1t'N t09801 1B137V,7n- ''It nI T1 8 llr00b 1j NW1M .b7?3 j*7ij6 7n 00179

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[49] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 49

0 01'lSNb;11 3`1 001?il t2`211#02 MVI XWW NO162 'i 111


1 }2 -733; wm3 f1tNa 1*lt ?ln min 8Wal 10Tm 31 a10Dl3 "31
47*111?3 161 Nl n1 ll8? f8 182 .10'riD j1 3'lntl rj t 'IR ?

.$"BSI 1314 tiSn13W %V4V bInN 84 3"a ?17 'i n t wjD `$ I;t,
8s:5"t- w'riI nN WUnit W1 urt fm im ii ? )71 u'r12i1
m9z limm vivin p3988nW1 1iorinvviim 7l8 ~ m lirm 1,invlm
pirrimn imp iftinrim xn N i wrin -Tp vp iv ii 1ruirim v
71,1ipN a rBy 1DN Nis1 Ietn -m 'it 11i im inN Wpri
i'(DJ NSop imnml 61 my-im #801y vimixS 1,1h
Ni'nr 17win N4 1 -poi x y 1n In1n Jnri T limt
kt'it)0 tnhi 1P1V NM1 4I73 86T$ lTl 17 nIN XTW)i 53 #8 99 WMitft JiniN7 T 175
orana d $ N 13'Tv a N No1 tri# #113 TN vvim rinv S-Iem 'm WInn
N'owim, tromm vuom imni m19 11 .i"Dm N vS4 1In= iWT I*W W*
92'TS nDW19 P'W31 niD@ 19877t 09710~ 1NWln~u 15372'# 9 p T~y 2l~
tlYt'lb10 PstNDt~ 1310 WN11 W2'S1 ln$f Di'991t n837 1187t #97tt 19# 5a
.?"ASy '11 1. 180
.J3WV21 .r13818 01X WW - S 1221 nrn rini i nrr r Nmtxn nnri
.ttWR ll .}2 111( .723ftliftl amri aNtbivli .atirllwi .6 irm .innon

a2n nri .am1 1 931 10 .D aim rant3 .ITPS 99fli? ."DM17"It WtnTI
7*t' nt raTl vo nal Nf 16 illi 100 o rnri Irimt ploirm n0vwoi rn1 185

'i ;1 'll~t;1$ ...11 N'IB2 pWlltt~l $'111m :r"T1 a3 Yn nrmn ... 1 S wpt
...0$19' 13WK 3119 DW9~ Trl'0 y18 nznin 'tn l11BM ,...91NWt Klp~
.2-M ,jtt i ,91' 1-,4vrlWVID M11n1 lit '0 so
.t3 ,t =14 81
. ,1 ,K ?tt* 82
2 ,mn ,M0 r'vtNw 83
.7-pm :ri
S 84 inon

5"MS$ ;01190; tpW ,init~~ tW 13000 D"S D'OUSEY 12K .2 ,3(~ 71 ,tral
pthim? DIf2K; 1'f1 31 jZ n01 ; DW I ipn2 DW :;1.rnr$iz n
Dll-p:2 1wunt00 1N tn-T 134H ;onrls 13p1 162in ;NMI OI2 b 1(3,11 M
mn-nit xvinr : }.1 iobn '*nN l-imm ;nn -T1pt aw-m ?p t Wp ; 1
pingz mimmN ;- 4mm milmn mi ;- nom Ipn= -11 N'1 ;xni -imm
.v* rvwxi mpnz pml7 ri-sx-T - Inrim)
3111n.61 n... U7@ ??t r V D"N (')?2V D"H) '122M1" :I ,bt ;1? 3tn @
1 973) prnmmNT xnj-?- v-1*9 mr tvwi nintv 1171?mn-T prx In :ttw WI
...NDilb '$btft N *N to *0 712

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
50 ALTMANN [50]
?npn ?n ?N ftylo, N l 't f 0u
17,0 N1 01Banm tsn 13 0yltri1n
ywr tivit 5? f.vi rvYIvo ?v
4t' iNm ,3 n 1 t r "IYnn rim
5N i1n5 1 mn nwit' 5D3 1iim
1inn3 'n jfi rv snx '2vi -17
5n 073 rion pkitz imnaDr t
5N uion w1iw n1 Win 55h Dnn
123n $11= 9112"I'2w 5m 19
f101yr) tyn In$ 31 467 0 tjl
jijt& ?? W n S NW

5n irnis3yi iv1n Dtiw O iv


Iotmv t3w.i ,s) im3wr 0
S3'4f3 tjnTn r)?2moj t t)0105
11% JX t; j; 'i 97 4ny 16?ur? 5j
,in 99,1vi tn rN 0110 tri f -
ID51 taln kl "15671 -',-1
19 n1"MW r- i 00% n1i3 ,I
1lnniWol 1 W114vy ftltrx 1
Irvi in0rm 'io1 trin vnN at
oint v *1W WWr 10W vmn
troiNx uniS 5z ivnv Ow trori8ri -,o 1 ND mntnn t 1 -"7it

) :m" n 89

.,,,=3l3: "033
.12SWty bn 90
91

.8" ,nt 10 !' b"9 92


.0 ,1 i'YSt 93
.r3 ,t mz r"' 94

.N ,rl r syW 0"37 96


.1$ ,tT WWW%97
.1$ ,n IfWW~ b"Y 98
.1 ,t3B n#'12 99

.10 ,, 0 tb, b"y too


.0 ,'1 a~D, o101

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[51] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 51

mvnw rno10 n Io r 1 DN 0c nalw 1in lipt tzw


7319' 1P ]19 l ( NY 0KliN' ?~k~ .Ylt flKN 0 I~K

1=)51 .n~ 19925 Mnti ith~ NWS$ # : 0410#N : D'Th


jn1~i mw ftioni r v* virm mi5mv -0 minnit -* iri
VIVfl ,l1"7 = 131t 11MV 7j flf '3 tf""I
lt
N?O? "Z MlIWIW?
?3Z INT ' VktDI
01 9 1kxf.1 D ?Z ..4-Ttur
13'?fl MOM -,40 l-'
tit Nirn ltkt1
5n3 i~r;z1 fl'KN 1T'K1 11?z1m ~~ t]S1'1rrn 6~X~ n
t11TI nUti v 1 'In iVW tNmv 111= 'In 7116lo N mDN t]m W
DW1 1 m tST1 p1 -111110?*l not1 * nii NS m1nt3
3"& .di'W90ff 9p1( 13100891 itibb 08 t5~1#~ 0
jII0 t#1 RIfillvibil Th U W iv wT? ]$ W" 31 '"n l
nfwL 1 *ovvlN t9i i1r n1r ?n izw Nxvi niimfifst
mvi~'lN nw iTvu1a ;*mn trprin mt jivv ftivit trivi rntr
imr, nvit n rat t3-,i?3 -isr m? niivi ntftm mn vvin
01nlikt j9 ?'i3 103 0 j D Ntt ?3tn V,1 Z;-,)4 tW*j? 137 ?

'7 ftW 1 t1 . biy l oll li NWo$ '121 Di ,31,T'In 13YITTm


vltw riwioS'p ?v troinvi trii-i nn~ nvn? wivx iran
Inv o1iwY =,* -Trat nnjum 74?ain rD 7 2t ait fth t1 13V

f104,J il6 - 105 9S

litt11PY
nN imilonmivwn Tim
liM n D; N imwi
122130 aw
19 mi
;IlD m
03
3 0 113~ D='IDT 000V83 itTn 07ni
136 Wil 1 1I2 311?ZAX VIM* In rv
129~ i~nt D'bWW 'Ti~ .12 1--13 7"0

%INM V'ktK TMV 142 -,1031 M


03?Tj DD - 1o51*7nV N
x1ni3 ?Nt rm 235
h13?I

.1 ,N' n D'WN~1 D -9102

*. ,0'70 I~mYl1 103

.T ,t~bj 0 ,i;n 104

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
52 ALTMANN [52]
TEXT B

13211 20,1121t IPMS9 V"3 *'D Ri' 1" I M '91 "T fIsV mnVS'211 ?
2 t?f jjt' 1'7~i)l nngit ?V nf) 1 1n 'i 17 7 g 1 Vl)t .InV71 I 7
nvim D3 nxtiopi 4wn'0?RNA 3 17198j- jNA 130j l1n'o T In3 7 4ST91D#J5

- ',I 11m99 DaN ju nwilpi, lirrllin

1011Nm 5

03ml "I nin ,12 1


2,1.rmI 'nm n, z"

mr" ov imintn
MS33 7D 41'tIN : r1
r"A'D nnnn lV4t 11#
lim ixm31ir iSr
112 It 13,711'"72S
"1Ir 121DW2 1=3O
*t 7w'ai gflZvv 1

aivit um rr? oT'iW

-i lrato N tni' nw
t1?lvn1 ar1niI iitN

109mn aa rn1i3v i
VM011i 61Ph 81T.
vm? min O ;m ?.2? t Nmuml trrr my Alm n%766 tr;m *?-lr l IK .linn m Pimm

mriv? T1rw rint? 'vmN~ tbi oln nvft? Mi tri *r1 i =211 W1117 1
1ftr t)119 "'12- t? = Mn1nn '11l* '41"=n Wttl VDI? W1IMn"1 W'llt
agw r1m= IND ri1w tw mwit -mol amB 1n 21 irNw 1 vtona WinV9 25

.-V -r11?Z 9'i 9'1NW 2


.mrtYln : '",I 3

.9Wl7'll.,I1 ,: ~'","2
2'4 76

.A ,3 * '16b= O

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[53] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 53

voini, innni13 nli' ixi 9 ilw 7 * mrW 13 rim1i n r n vini am


al. 01,1 73 ID' Itl 'a7fiv .1"Wi 03D1IM 1,N 6 PW1 n0lm m
In 13NlI;i1 12nma imu' 149D 9rwii i1"-' 'iinn lvlmpo nini T

aD5ba tli'3Di W thnY Chb98'J 19N 0~~ YS13 993% D' NS 13DU

171DO ' lawn 2 131V WT 1'13 73 1 I,.t TIT jP031ll 417


i40 't Pltt P;1'3 P0t~ DS IS ; 9W 81=1l l3''$% 193~1 ViN;I '89
,rinn nittoirmm =5UTH mirm o-&W D n" 11'3im iwiabT w1r"vT
n*%nin m rini xriS1Pj%?5pn oqo~qal mairim irrivoi irnnm
Nm1 .xrivam 1iisk inni 1ti l2i nwnimo wrym virn asa iTE

tmS p vow 5 ira Nirmum ir ifivir Bmi inprita n urr


N7s5 oT= 51 MSDN bT5mt 59 ; Np 01 3 irfnvm nirm
mo8snmm mmn nim " ftr D nnnri it? airnl =m$nri ripmnm

it 130W n "t 1i 7 SW ju 1W13 rlt5n ;T"In T=1 N61TV1 =


5vign mnom jur~rivi n5 5v nna?znktm roinninn manuirm arr
nY''bS# lf43 1YKn# 10175 IMtt atbt TES r9039 t228 ~an

rmyn'i 7nt3m
imo, min wrivi
wfyaqNhm
1 5inxi
livne, ir"i
a 11 =5 5mivirim
0n wo7,iinm mn1r
i in twim m

.';1 nKD' ;1SY 1293 1937~ 3011 Db~ rrtD MVSr nDM ?NT 'DW~~
=#1lJI WS53
N';1; P'IN; M;titt,;l
M1 I Z315V n t310
in 31 Pl T1-21P 1Stt
fl"tl l WN
Y0197 alS l3121V
l 9975 1012 1
MW rvui
wrol tll'ilt -llY 1t5n,im
5n ntopw ntllftl '0#9
#qni~~~ 'IIW 5Dfti
nv miwmt l P 1invrno
mf rintm W11

1imri
R11 7vlNa
i'173 vi MY
NW01 i-myrrin ton
7 ngMIT 1rMr
3""I72 T12-12nl T,11"DI
1no hXbi 2= rl613
3 50
D1-21D71 X51 ftt '11 %TV 111MOM ;lnlyb IWX31 1 V =t
min -hrmn w ty0-in urim m5Nn1 t1p0rii innion t mu7nw
nwx purn me orn mi nt =a 12mmmt3r in~i vo ;*D5 nirm

n~fvnn Y=5 v ~siN ir-on x ~i nnnon rinimn 1-rmnn min

i31nn , 1imDr 3 70$1 mil mimp,5 115 rm mm1w NW I '


1WR(' lfto7 n 11P3 '75H 1 XI)l 19 t35 Vn5= It Tt ow
14 wir riWWit5 nmit nn intv 1 irtpni ",I nn- 13 i Wt -jV
am 1rim mr-lon ?3Dn rnw%7u 1 j W'i 17t02 1n 1-11 15 5D 4t)n 3

.n ,l? 1rl,'110 11
,to 1 ,to: jjl INS 14

., , ,? 'IW 15

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
54 ALTMANN [54]
111211,11=1tI 4n 11B "D 6*2TIM 112"rIDST 1,1033' imTWM M IVI1.1 URI 2V

Nl tin
lt? '7 fl3
m.1' jt
YbKZt1?Z I 5fl1
fl nflli )T m
lt ?y ?1jfolft
712N 1Vf4
flmZ fl lf 1,9Kn'i
f11K ' n1PB
XlI 1DN 1j16
6011"
N" '3 4n mm ovim r"381 1imN 19?Ntm im nlm I '*N K XN 121fn17 60

tt? ,:) Inv= m5n~ ~wt rilgir ii rmni ~ nsirm onswi, ixt 16 1111 I~n? rjjni
tNran vm f17v 0n- imW1n' rflK ,fljt1n nz' im is1rn8 vbm pon

24tD P4l X " W23 t'l 7 j tt I 7,t3 13v 1 z37fl 80 19m mir a i Ii
11131 134?tjn n~l J~nt jnlptn 11tt lll nl~ mprrul TI% ; ? j w1inN ullt t~lf?I
Is ?T'1 r1fl7 - 2pT ft1?Z1 n1 f pl 1"1fiZ~ T'17? T Zl '8 TD 3 mip 65
0 181,71 13"'I 13"3017T 2=2 1 13Y V2*1 Own 13-11 -71 m 6K 85
13"731
xvini n 31,811W
lsml ti mm 11311V
y mnlqv 0i3*n
tl mTI"
NSt=n
r $11mul ir ' in
vi~ m al?*ir wiwl31 oftl1owt
v w1 i nb1r

nwo ovi vinnro 1 tmo03 0 v-0 - Yf" r fTi 178 wiftv * tt 18 tim-rn
miftim murpro zi* %i? i o-v utal ttt viiin -mm ram ri~tt vri fLNtln* ?nv
131;1 M1111"nX nI r M, In999 tft= ' 19 b; ?n nI6 1,l1 411f19 n9 i70
billayniWWl 713a# 51mor Imy7 1911 wD nyI 19 20.1? ftm mmorr vnzl N iorri t 70
Iri1rmn mi Psio 1vri mvin 1i3u1 20,mt itir g nrim Ox wor* y mrl mm i3f

lN llYn1; NIt ml ,I ftleTwo larm #31 nl lr?Dl I in 6,1 tif T1


21.r- , p nm
W" ?D 11NW B 171 11"D ""Y 1312V 13V %Vbrll'74 Wil Nti Mn tib u 75
nntM v niin* n 01 1 9 itnrm, l?% rmlrmmv? -nnion ?tt 3nvnmlill
%Ilt 4 iNlftmmimft irr a Slmo 13119"r ?V5~Y t3"1?31V 131"M ',=? 13"M*1l~l
13?ND *O Di 13"?) Dn 22jW 1lft9 1D' D r1 0.187 In 981 ;iV 'In tlfl01817
DADD~ 25301 D'$DDS 22 01ty88; 4Y 13tt L53p9~ f) ;Ity'lT17 5Y 'IgV n") 5
erjorm oln trnywn vi*?mli rat? vlop-7s vniv 'yalt ) rn nor wrtr ll'l l'm
24 11"Jo9)9Ill ovno It* vintrm urmt tXj 23 J " M 9'76*1r 7 I'I1Y' 80
1 lN in itr rom ftlvx 1D V N n"m 910? I1 nm mtvv? t-rn llmzl
VDID Immon mlm 71 1 mfoNm Inln -',-I TA% ' 1f 'tb# r00
25 5HtlVal 41.t i 11 0 t 3j ft bl NS33Itt 1 ).t nohil i vinav iruin trintNar
Ll"llirm ;IS17 -- 9"t ls? DJ'T ;t'T '1'1118 = ;~Ist~ti ; 9 1SS79 1"Slt';
.?" 13" D '10N 85

.tVI ,In ,1 1-1 D"y 16


*24 ,I 21WH 1")-1 17

.Nm, jv P tvln 01 is
Itn ,tt 12183 19
.X ,1 n1312 20
III ,j SWW'l 0"Y 21
.2 ,SD tDWOD 22
.t , Inn 134 23
OT ,1 Inno 25 .1n- n :S"itS 24

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[55] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 55
TEXT C*

mn1 1 1?Z 011 ,flnflf l v n 1 f12 11?ZK f1319"M Z 1"101f3


1"S' z 0liv 11(orto rall2,1ni3 f"mag "I 'ift31172

"1t, 1 f212141,17 0 t11 P 87 t o1T"Z ln=t "jS1


?~K
1'N't fl~1?Z"?
19#N lK 1881
$"ti 0213 VfZlNW
K 1N
~ff'nS2
n'l~Y; ~" flflZK
Mt0172 1VZKDRn~~n1
L$N Of2198~ $#170~
.amn tably? ph arb
ftDWX N 913"1211? MR 4D T10331 6 DI It83 " N13T 0 MT*9 ;18831 N 3la 1
13"'lloV211 Vil"Xn ?Xftlvl fixt t ~ty "lonlj~mn nniul ft$ilt m2ft n
t3,,111 111ft '13n'ND Imill ml lnn 0y nwil nu wurnro 'ripu8ftil b
Dy rTjYI 12nf131 '2,~1 t row1 ri n1Kr rwifz'n ir rnfti toZV2 im f 1rfti

PCS 129 PN 13 .WW DB ON h 31"2l D *0@ rim i 73 43 IV1 f

mithD -'2 7fl 92 4- IIIK


.K[ ~"j'D
~ ~ N-7ZlZ 3- III3 09 3,[1" III 3
~ ?v, Pl'YSI~nPI
I 11 K13 7,nrn' [13;1 i01 i 'nj [fl')t P'P Dz~ A 12 sI ' Kir~ W12N N[

5 D0112VI *"i ,t'*1 W"Y i'1D ,-100'`337 x 2":


25 C 47 *"D ,I"ln rY V16713 n 2 ,331t100tN I 11-
3 C 47 4"1 ,33" yl rV I1 11"M ,11307-100* a
II f1 & in in nwiii Kw117rpti irrt rm V i in xlvww tr .nnvni ivz1n n

13,1372 1 [0
mon < >

a-loiryp i irni vxa= rniy- . tnN rninm >) t 0 n vzo II I mnrn No1o 1 1
001 :181@~~H~V 981@DW2 SN MWltb~ .1NI123 NWI 1'; N'f 0**03 PC'W219 3 .nP9158
II I 0120 [I128 11 1 (: 2"099 (i~~ 00% (INWV 198 01bN2 .itW2W~; Ditti ;r113
II 1 1 uni1 1n 3 ;*wl ?Nmjpan 2 12nnn Irlin ?nlpall II 3 nDvnbr [bbnP
,I a = [?"-t - mroil 4-3 111 l b - t3-'7VDtT V3N11 3-2 11 ' 7"-t [1"1'M II 11-1711 =1 2
ii n x rn-1in [n13 12 15 11 = rirnipn W7211-pVi 12 11 2 N V1=21D binl1=2m 9

.r~,t3 ,*'n ,T'11


.g~ ,fl1 f~l?rNK1~ b"1 3

.1,,I 13'")121 "A)


. ,n 'I~uzJ b~f 7 .%D ,U4 , = 9 6

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
56 ALTMANN [56]

w*3) lo mw:n v 11 ux i
ftmr'i v oiTD 0t2m= zr

?,w ril-m ?N mna D'3f


1'3n9l, i)pptt' 09u mnin
,i ?y 124T t"r N1' 4D "w

xl? mlnl w D 1rr1v ,4,in 3 mmirm, m vrm w Ni1 7n irm min "T
nom mD v 4Dar mTrin v lim-in nt umm7 I1n nx in n, '17 11147

'0
"I-:$31z'Ib
1817PN?1
is.= In 01D'~
n =imw;rn 0**0 137'~tp,, 89718
O I D1"tl P~ tWi~n
ll l j3'- i}191D?'y
,"T1'ltV , 1,h"nto
7Y"l2TD

-T.I lyv-lm n"ID3 Ift3 13?ly in Irm nmm 1W m .*l)t t9n? 0 D It 13'N
aIft -oi.r " n." ,nN Pwimn nhn nWn3V " ani, N1301 "Tn nn1n 1 ImI nI n30

.013 1 P 11 1 ml -Iftr n lnrr? 1vi 'r in) WW l n31 w ini in =ny-T


n4TD Dj1n $N0417 IjT~bln%,Il J Dnu lITnly',17YV'ID1-7-4-TUD WD"N
nl1t27 10'1 .1?1; H93 1981l n180 DtDDl ,013' DoyiWnt ;1190 '29 #38 I90

"IT I;'l X . 61 1 4;2M"' 1 "l l ; '21 Y 1 21 111,HI . Y-T "l ? t 111 6II o 011 1 1,'198 1s
I 2 0Dpn ' a,,p? [1,,nM 28 1i 1 X &'1 f [t?I 2 27 ii 112X H1 [H71t 25 7[ I 47 m ,'21

.1' ,f ;rr b10- 8

.l' ,S f , lN' f D 18

1,2n7 NO=,: 31 MOrW 31' IND7 .2'3 m10piJ n2N S-3W ?W7n0 2u K ,NbD l,'4l-O 12
7:n 4Y .1T r1 ,13D 12 " ,IU 1n '1 ',. ID. M K? p1 ims1 ' ,l- I T 3'7

Sb unwrn) Imsy s* N ,in non. n nTvivZ Im rnp m p i n immnyn t


.I '?'1? Nz W1 T -mmNl rn worm I- N o 1 ?'Ki m rnZ '1 :tNz H (=%-I '-*3
mN? ,t2 "12172 14

.t ,3 ; 1 ,t 7 l,7112tl ; ,"
.A ,n 'W 1v'1"1
, iniri DDo1 is

i,:: nWa,
mV01 11971 092
nin- n tm,'z
113w IIV.=72m1 niniW
rr M-1D o in I- 8N120n
IN t 11 3m"inur
0 n 9p Poo.mp1o It
7D a *Ivn Cl 19 'I,,nn n

.(%-I ,n? ,bunaMv)

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[57] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 57
nnj7088TI$#ft'j llin ftrnTA 18 , ri* ivaim?wmunx m
iiu anfm [rnu'tr 3a min 1 l'fl rX1 'Ofl 361 1. 1',[I'8n 351M K I'TIV VD'W'L 35
t1rv 3 iriD in 11 twinK 20ri 2o.@t ; fh,2112M,7 ' K ,00 1. 3901-'
22 rihmxvv not) ?vn rrizi-mv inzi rivii tt? r o mg # Vm21 iltfr i
nxin ?rIrw 'q ;mn?% b1 t3wir1 ,t'53 Z3 N 081 tI -ft 03W 23 'W ma1 low
ornno D1P 13 1733 -mMS rm Itrun 41 24001g1 1 'Itpn nj5?
071=1 14M 1I7m727 SN 10 .""M = IlN 111itl '1D1 8716M %0 11271 40
mn3 7Nm ziy-T- rin vm Inri jvnm? rr :lio onwi 17i In 1 , nnsi
rlW1r wm-* }'N .1'93 9m qi1-t Nn u 1 6 P1 r7n t' Dm -mnt un 1 , rmpri
111*1 .1 37 1r1137 13sy A"vvli 71yi a'lzt l 01$1 m001oe .13T*
}*2113 tg'1N1 l'"'33 NON =1";IY9 1ph~ DiL 1?Nt llm :5"tl as xl"D ;r317

ili m-ftmN rivXliND 37 11 m mrftr D t=?ln9 36 1121 1N ND 35 11 X -''I "N "'ft2,- 35


x n~to l*3 1WN 39

.'1*1"nI - W -1Y miPr" :- aw is


.7 --i ,l -7 t'v n Wmr i b ; N ,, m1o=2 ?,ov 19
7'i3n ,(X1inymifti arrin3x tIm Wi v in ) ,m Wi JS 1WB 'lbN 111 'o 20
13MV 002Ml nn?*I 7, ?n 7"1'27 1M7 M1213T'n Y -t7 :N ,m - 3 ,N n-T ,-"In
m-17 mtkl ... mrllm071 nrimm 72: n??lmvi rm110* rl?.v nium 7ml m i m rim 1- D1pno
almn iDmn arl-prin mpmm1 7M tt 33p;r 09 SN 1WW 'IRV1 M... ttZ 013M DNW
'In 1 ..IlM 'w?=n t3"'9j' VPM ?171-0l 09IY? 'IVOR 'I I n VI 7M XNTW
T'7YY MNW" IN"=" 134123:01 W"OZB W2 W1 %2 D'D Il1-L3 NSl-M mrimnm-
"...~t~b 7 ~ ; lln 1--0 Z3- 73DN VD3 71 tY I n W1 V2DN1 01Mb
.JD ,It '#WWVV" 21

83121tol oIOT) "nim: (P10 mftm ln-lyn 191DO Y: 46127T -jjn-,V 2 22


MN X"M 1311-2 01 nn M1110nM IM:) ?*I? 0411-73V ?M-WD r' i3m"-:2u~zlp , 11 ,(ri-
-117 mopriin brim.74-Ty mmor Piv rmini v ra ?s; rmin amm pv ,v I?= ri(n"zri
."btlin 71i1n 9llunn
.N ,J' j"- 23

-innni .XXXII '-u ,n pT ?vim ?wn? --* n1io ar wn1y? iln 71- 24
NM I-Pin~n IC2" :7121 - MIMU 132 ##n1Dn IMDW MY11Y31 '? s27T INBM NIM NI

.-n-no mIii wn -T- TinNmn iw ?m :qlvm Isp qsvz i7u rimmu mm1 .t11-n
?NMvm -I=1 wr "O1n 0 "M- nNMD t7 N20 Nt V-t7ia- ?NT YM1 X? -T-P ?Z=
;rAl ~ l :tt 9r1r :jnivZl3 "D n'nn= " aM 1142- "'lT Vpt N (XLVIII ?mu)
71 11wtl ji m1n0n 'I-*n pt ?yl Jun nnnom p- mnnimv -11-P"m -i ID1W orpS
... n1nn 173 VlIY M 1Vn nltn =b6 7XV "D DY IN1 1"'M 'I11M.2 -NI n X* M1
11361V nil ="YP .-r t,7am l.9 0 1 710l9 10 * IWi W1y N1x11 =D6l rin jPri mt mril
.onsl Mlyn -nian " in wly0 ?rrmli ,I 12V linyrh 7'12m vin
.1 ithi 25

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
58 ALTMANN [58]

11"11 01 "'IT PX br %? '131, 2


3n'1v plum I'Dlli am n Yi V1

Z31t 13?jy Ilntjuj?1 jjjotlrj?

~'I; ;ili~ .lDIXI 5N81willm


[1=30 =DtV 1,722 Wsf 78
11trnnm 11721 , .1wit 1
3irrv7 B TS ilt 97 7e1'n
7S41 1; iN ?x 4:)9N DIm ' '
1i9m DD 13 iinntinn anllm
29,MVI VOyWV b
fq?.iu t3"tftInm 'r113"nw 7
131IM41V "lot 1,1F)ntur ?"E x
si tN 11m1 1311411110 11127 3
mm 'I1f1t n wftlo Ivt
',1 12N ? 1.2 ftJIV '%t1 ?n
.1 M12 71d [V21Mi V1101 [
Ilj 9 111 m f wliumnl [1221

.0"271~2 WK1 *o .VIM ZZ7


.2 ,24 ?NMiT
RM" V10J 1?W
13MI ...3m1122
-14WI1 inn 11bi'
2 "tV
ornmi Pspi irwimm -inio 1w
1#NrfP11 0 = 33 NfVWt rNI 091912 'lt

'PJy ,t11wil mtmiN w) Ow a01N1 -Dr 10


97ttt&ljst6rhlj...) "'t" m 7i" 3 Mlz
,m' ,'pal) 3 ,'m 1-In v) m9 .1nl7
n01' '-)? t11 iSt 'I'V IOM 8 1 i7' X2 iH
"-1ov=11 jmp i3 twiv in1x1 3i1 ...
1Srll*13W" ,"fl9 ;Iffl0" NtlN12W 01827
12"T1 .(U:) %13?- 1 ,TM N 33-1- "l-?
nwm17-WD" 01,6m-woi tvvv7a in rtr
vlm-" ?13vo m'lIm in Pit ,m Ppn ,Mt4til
,17 1 rm Wh3 "3$180 73 n v In l 81
.....9872 v W11v i vim--p

alD11 741 V2 ,1m 'm 12a


,M '")i ,9911SW ,I-Inl '300 ,bibi 1W
.Y1 '2V

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[59] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 59
281ti l "11?21173# t3ljt 1 J*ttt l WEj$' J' :1?2X 4 12*7 31r 00 3 I131 1 198

1-1? rivi xvil029 xml lu?xi -i nn0T 1Di tr-inwn ??inn riv1 v0
DINSW 111191 0111,11 14,12. 4TIVV01 161Dl7l 412t t3wN18litim rnit ?tom
7f611tR 1nn 1 KI-i NJ-,IV bit1i Vj190 V-10 1? j ' l V y1 s: V "T1 10
Jjg?4'X W71" 41"XI tPl,'710 ?n n-I~an -Nlkt $t,-JV 'in 6X`Jn'oj lDH X JDJ Vol,-
1t-7m tN ft 1Nmm tN~ 1n-WWv r1in ?!; tF? 7 Vjn j tC nX 'fl1t1 *DT ,n
linnin~ll WV3D mSwill lV0 12 T1til PW17 I 1t NY 1 lysl 9 vrv k fl N iri
?z 1ixvz m-n1o101 -r1Nxi miriv rrnvl? ni1ri rummi vCi -, 0twx1
-l TMR N1 klD 1Ii trin j)n MI3MI WTD910 t3"W. IV-,l 0 P1201718 15
?n lwnt xv1811i i n t 1 $1 mv~i kp1-7-1 i Tgv0v-7v 8vv mn w1ur
8 1173 int 1WR T 1 m# in irhm n12 n--rv 0*1un or172 JT 3 1Tanim
von (Na1rinivi r v mrov1in) m8887min vinworn na li# T 7-nx,
17nvottntirtv irriv vmn rmm w-7"z9 * "Arn inn ivnn z jntt 'jngy
I-VW MIND 01 171040$N1- X1102:1 90 1 Wnl MVZW 9l1 T1R1. I -*= h20

vi0omv rin nn 7-lizi mmu irm mrn -8110 p rimtNirm n .'in inn

}*.1x mi731;11 3 y to wn"xi in rl8 .1tol -r-l2 rntr1834mvt3 714v

V11 110 7 4=11-I 170 Alt- ii 88 }i - in-$W18?21

M-lB21 bD6 1m1 I Dp'Tm '1-12-IDrin.rivrinn -Nom121 mv 01 'n*D -lo


nn2 7n trpvmvi'n rm in io irn nNWnin rn ifTM1 -,n4 trift

1 W711112 X w? 11 N IN lllt 12 1112 "1002 [N-100211 111 MlnX [AN?3bt10 112 X ]b


7"1172>16116 1112 13-120111 0'"0112M15 112 bt8 no10 2-olit 0I I I = lvm [=vrn131u
NI t [13- 1 n 27 11 2711.1 113'710 9 23 I 11 2 Ahn-3v [D~irm22 11 m <rymi

fl? Zi Kifl ..n1 vVI mn 1 n v2 on3"-:?? '"? a )-IV InNlks1, 3


mimurn m;l iwm - =? 0*1n "In'votl, 1 mr @ 1t N riV n11236 -Inm r n ril... l
H1I1 MWP 11' '1'0 t ty 1 ...Ilib? 1111" I"nN4 W41 n8lwm vi1lo t m
."P imm 1 "172 132Inr T7=lv? TIl2 -rml It? ... w0*1 j1 l 991nr
.13tV ?Mj='1MX i"'1 ?JV "- 4
.00'1 'BM ,911010 19 L,7"337 s
,?y , ?v zim nw tv rw 6

. fi ,l Koi" 7
.I ,N k 131 8
.au,"ti 9
.k ,V' 4 "19

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
60 ALTMANN [60]

D'101 '11:18 I'11NfT 11

1'7
,in C1131 772 D T "
D1TR1111DI NW DJT
X11, 1
X14fiv 107x? 1* M3 n 7

lv1vm rm 10
5NX=6121Nfl -,1
nivi 49 il
tbom a
wm?
61n~n *'OR I)V V1 Ill" Wo '
5lItrm Ir m 1TNI .ljli" D

1813 y*20 91 A
WVMS 1,12 114RV 11,
'*-V "3 11 .11731 ?V'3 1X
n5~ua;Ir~~ ~lax~lt~~l N

7D 9111, 0minn IN nel17 u'nm 1 3ml- 1723 .19 11,1 rTJN; 'tn1 61'7inx .11,01001 NTT=
S1313 ftjWN ,1D 11"m N 13 JD 9 0180 010 0 1 0 4

13*'=VN13"IVY1
111'" 0 Y 03nn
1 111B 8 8 pTSri 0D %VS MV90P
13""It Ti n t 00j
t110)VMl v45
n'1613 f11119,311, 11.1 11n41 W 1-12 61 4y , 1121 4
n 111
'10n '40= "'1112113"'11121-1
In ITIR 1f33nX N3IO VIN1 13-TVXn WR?
'1-1-il niWj3YVV
N?jt 7n 11D7 14
IvI1Yu

1n Vlly"V '36"n 73"V "IZI }319 " 1 N 193I7 I?) ]$


vEt mN minii Dix nj-m1.011-7 vN 71.113 7411-11 n(
In? XI 01111 n 1T X }1) $Dn 14.1'174 11%3n - 142Hn-in h
X21 4D1 i"t l-n% limaNWv x 17# 1vx 7 1vi6 1ni'y "mK alftin 1N
n111"1I *130 Inn 7111 V'41 " 15 ?"Tj 7nj-p? 311D IDI
ft8n* 1SW1 3"I **ib *DN nmnI 17 21 t3nD1
S IUD1 3 -1-10D,'l t" ' 721V 7111 13yV 1P33"'113 11-142 jtlwjW

i vinsml1 ['nml 4111 1 12-1 [:2 36 I N1 1 N = NM [KIm n 34


II 11 7V'71] 52 J r1 1=ir [n1vinmii I rN ni rvll'i .imni 47 1
["'t31 56 11 iz nrn2 i [n1 ivi 1 s1 0Bnnnn [r 1i Nt ~=1"t1
.T, ,"..1.211 11
.1 I ,10 ,"W"tV 12
.7,3S nAbig Djy 13
.I t,34 tDDWj2bli67111 , jV"1 ",tD NM'1 $ 5
.21 'IM , 15 ,7"$bi 's

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[61] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 61

11~b 7"11'31 -1 Dm"0 ' f10 f~I " '? p M f ', Nln "79 1 2 =2" 1pZV r 1m3
11?' 01 1N? W "i99 (90 00% (N 01fNl13 1Nfl fl~18fl11 T' lT'l

i'n n," nr'ton in '~ "nr1 T'in n",M 131' 1111 To1"a"n rn'l"at r 1= n~n "

]W, 9 '1 6IT 160 1 1 : tl'r1 f1 11 r '1Tj [f1V17 n D '~ ~i7 .11 57 II j [3t ? ]I 1 n i
nn311 rm -mv1 zirmnn vit v vC n '1,2 '1311; 1,- 173'18 rim ifrr71-o3n
Dmmlln 3 '4D 7, '= I 1om10*2 m217rl mlm? mv-1 "Inx nn pT 1iv
iqn ?3 innn noi n n nnn '" l -invins av 20ln" i xv ' mrnn oinn
["1 mIn i l l72"1 l n NM,64 I1 7 ,'T1?Z [21 "1N I'"' 611 1 0In mmi NX 65

15ND pl m 1, "1
*m m11: 1i3nr inno 75int
71111 II [j l'l
i 1n[ i6
m1rv
~N i 67
'Nxi] n
n "t
I ]1Smw raNm
it [ nD {i :i 0llo
9 'CD 143DDW 1i WCm I-1 2 1731m -111- 134-911V WWWYl? llmsn 4n Iti Sltt9

.9? zm1 n "arn V711m trim 7 917 im1 n91Sw tz* nv rit 'l Yt -"798 70
in W.) -113.1wl 71t -s5 4n nnn b" t xvi 1?DtN 20 p 51n njnt 13-1-"1, "

1"11 23.44nZ 114nol njiftil 22,0ggj? 6"I'llnn n-1 14-I0 K jW7311 21134=22

]W71 11 60 11 a1 = prn m- ir i- n-T? ll-'l "11* 7"11'71 57 11 x 10 i0n l ii Nm ir-7mv

II 2 -11MV1 E112'SM 71 111 JW 17"MV) 67 111 ["Z1 1 11 N 7*2IW lyl IW 11 N X 10**3

.2 ,ni, T
.A totb 72 ni', n,'l s18
.X ,m- 4DD 11 DW , im l W1 19
.0 ,NW2 ,*130 20

11i fl10v- vm 1m -7 -t kD 71 ' W1 NW T17 2 t1'OX 'TI0 9p'n17 110 in ?I


."1= T "7' 1=2 1

t V ... 1V71O 11W V, ~n7 'D"T1 'I)I,l'; .,l :: ,: ?7 ,V'2in ,,. ', i 22

nimri rnpp~m m rn1vWn B ao i'm "r- n lm I rv in -rm ',n -s nnii "iin

* '."Wb? * I n 77 f " 0'21 ,111f7v 1) 0 t mm tm l 23


Wt'lb ... lbNt -'1 6r7 1r:2M1" :**lr 2 ,1l=r33 j , j1"1n-j , ItV 2 ')r ) M 1 23
-i nm? mmo z?., I rtr? " l rr , I t,PIf loom 130t v mt , ',n " f",,,n1

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
62 ALTMANN [621

8390 53 24 1471ny-1 al
I1WDn t31 unt 21 in N 1112W

Z1
13 Ki Tn 'xin'i
71671 pj3'1K 'Ts~'K
f21 -1K DD
W11
Stt1 tN 1IN 9# 1'7 tN 93 13
.*'TIj V1In 25 sK 1K n'17w
int I1ii1 f1tTnul N$1', IN 31y
.rn'o [BR 03 1 tv xvm1 [it
lTtlmlv '40t 111hrlin xti n
ttW4v 0i [ 3 2,t7ly3 [3m n
~'tK1 N #li $1 231'2T ;1b$ 0
6DT WW "11 lnvw ma

11l4'7"itiv 101721ti m i1ni 093" lo 013 ,11 m'l11 "1f12T a1391 21b'u11 ' "D 1'7 ?t 5
Imn t6 4D lin11zi 10,71,47 min ? pll .1-ID -mv ravlull n n." mlivirS a -T 5
b i5 n 3 71,47, 411 11 H 1 NiV"%= 11-71113 Iwnp trr1v f 3"D1 1136311 Titfl
I'1gXA l'W 1i2'12 N' W P'"2 ''Vf 0Y'N~ Pft~2 01@$ D 'l 611 Dn DW1
I163 D BSD -TV 5K '13 1 m1901 iltz WI3 13 w t17 inN nlnv3 0132l h
1J UI j12S f1f It1to1 Vl W n '3D1 27 p -'ri m1l'-I ?w volofn. xggmv
1371 ? w n NY 18 '1m- 1 31 1tts 1f -W1 WW 12; Imv3 vvel -InD 10
n?NX /"N 0X 0 T 'V 131 28 Z3'itttWn VV41 13423V JJJWV? 1-74 1p13 013J Yt3 Sjw
'll26110 62111T1 T"?i s 3071"InKt 114211 'il 1 %1' r 111 $ 'N113 1 29/,nrf 'a1iT
5=l'agn 31 199 t 3031m 3"9 1111 111 '733 Jtfw1 ;I"3pr 1891 092319

[76n1'l II 1 T~ N 1K II 1 3 lapptr' [7ITl 77 11 1 j2'p7 m 3 Pha ly 76


.X Ps [n'l - nl=s 82 1 2 ["',] 80 If 2 X
IN (T 17 117 I 2l7] 15 1112 3 Wn low7IICT 7 11 = A??Il 5 1! X XNN [X [3 1112 X' 12-la * 1 3

Hinsiv 1"121 maim -7mv1... M M'M =1 MSh ."...tIM Dll


'?1 "*m1f I nfl 1" :,7 T1 ,1"-72? NtLKW 411 ,X21W- 'IS 7 1'f D 3;l n71 ' l24
'7 1ri rane 7JU S~'1o Lab fJ1 77"1 '11 T71' "M '1 V ID 1l2Io 34 D
IN ... 1ppIrt l17w r nimtbC ?1m Inni rinivrio 1 n1Wi n ,11,7 tvo 189 -1 rf

.K ,3D 7'1Z ;K ,71 T"y as


.K :' ,- 0 "07t1 4 30
.(n Mp) n lp " lo ,' ",n 1oY 25
.T ,(il WWs 28

.r ,nip rt;In 29
. 0 , -T " -- 1 , if til l'l 3o

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[63] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 63

,1721 :"1 7Il ?m i a "t ,0 710 n/11 it in 'io %


n111 j9N Tv m1imm 13innar Nxtw amrinn 1,m n if 1?m
11?2K 11,1V r11117 innbTr mtrnv tn n 0 -3W ?mm Dflv
1inr m 1 1137 m1mmm 1*34 %n-T In rritm-m mn 1
nirrWm ?"r* tW4 31 -) nftrg 41; DX 1 ,71 mn 7 b In
32 vinno ig v im ion winto vift iu11X *7t) rv rimoi
'N32W 1Ill DitV ;I 7I tD 'DIW Rn %71w1 I3 74t *t7N nl '8
Inntir m 2m3 ?D .1D rrio 11*3 itD n tn g2m 'i1 1 m
34 t-'17 3 jar~;t mrinum ion mlln Ini . Inl u n"sym110.1 1
Ml~ 5"U 3"T 3?5it? 1213 '03~ N3183 }1 .'131 13 7"7 1105 '1
1311'7;0 nn "Nj 35asw 1 112tZ X1?27 J In '1"7fj--nm* t?
rinn i131o n 310 rt 3 tio im: in;tmin mwil i 1 t#
mrvl'-1T wels1i m$1vn nix nx IUNm -1y I51 -IfrN %1

xvil 41tr In14 ]121 Wvit nnillm x80voWlrRT T1


T T0i =11103 ,01"13W '"Y 1 t3"W M1 616110.1 IN'll NT11 ?
3'D7' 181730 i#218 IN D'900 130 fEN~ 13 W1 WS1' '71

Ni? m11'1 put r tlt' W ?IN 11N 'i 7t-7 'IN 38, u1 *1 ?3y
- tnW i '161 26-28 111 DXN [198b 20 112 X 11RN2 [ 111MN II N 11*

.n1mim mrnoml "mm pion 'I'C t *W "H-,l p"00773 Wo rtutb f 0


min (N ,-q3s, ns4 InD pu1ml) 2 s 131 WlbIu -i w1ira m

3 ,33 TT ,WrTfiy rn1 '0 o31


.N ,0 rvz 32

-4 rljj 14 - Inn mSJ 0 -,1 72 a tDDon 9-1 ?-j ,r" 189 bili ,'034
131- 1riv 9 }TIY Iy inmo... rnvpti?-2 tvnw ri i=-wm 131 mrn ,11-? 2 v i1tori
mm" Txn 'ninlyimn bD 1pr...'1r)'SM MT ?TD ' ,111 I M-1 tmJDDlOn ".1-1081M 91
... ror*1D pI 1 0K3 JW 10 1 7
.2-K ,H17Z rM ,'l 31 m12 ,(T"-Wn) "=1D K-n11pNt ,?" VP ' l fl t ls '0 35
.N ,M l 7 1 a 36

'7 009 AbWM ,11 ll1611nin$ 0 ,to NW1,( "t) n" 11if ,-jj,- 100 37
nb .:9"tl,2 ,N xo Nb,(n"fT) m1muln 1010- 0DTv mm 1 w ,11V 0 -)-Ton wm1wpils.
NnitW1 (Nwimntl : "mimo jvn"it N Ntom T ?"Wi ?n-r mnnm tv'm nn*m robm
i xrNPtrlNx: K"0) ' qn-ym 6 mi WCn o r D 1K,;,14 (m tvi 1: i "t) 1NK7x1pm
5nl KNifWln3 N1o lKnm3 1 K l7 nri1i 1 ... Mt K11ia nf pi Nt K7vv1 (2"T.
p orCt Imml (.0 711 tl K1 t k inth: n "T) .11-110b= btlm .11-m*1 tn3 rbuvi
12 M11 NK?IK K W1'0 rnKr 1 X Nn1wtZ72 P0'07 7Kn KN ?* vn (KTirr WK, :*.2-) 'KW
v1i- '9!7 (m?*0s It : 7'01( ,1" n0-)K?r ") rr mir -w irt J1 38in
S1YtN 513'330 8 11 '91B nNnt 7M N (N ,(H 14 n'T tt081 T) -, 4 n' I -@ 38

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
64 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT [64]

7 ir) 141Z tmin D ''n K'i39,1'1 V31gn l"fi 91)y ~ j 1 @ I


1IInW DB2
loinmv imn TII 8101mitill
74krall TK39 611naln
K8 K131 [Kppm
bnit ' 351l K 1
n? rn rlr"
lvz[IWt V f1l? 134-35
In* xl-Klrrv r-wivi
lyb1il ?lft1w3 vin nlin 7ni .71y w . "m1 -won l n111-T "-11-* lov 7 1-Ti
nf1138; N'IP30 nlbishi Z89 'bD 9"t N)1t? IS tlf l"'lntt 1't) P98 019WS
'IaT '11 ill ?%y 718 091T8 ittn NV '173 WV1 :-"Tl 40 'Tlr 1 l? 35
1imwaw l'ar (?vi on' rW -i) '1in1 i1n1hii n itn?n vv' tK ti01n r

W1t t*kf -htN-i ?X M'Btirt h NlD 21ZW TD1 j x im v vi m insi D


W-M &161,12V X? tSttlN t3'1W0371t 1117MM =IV' IV *7%7 * 7tl 'Mn X IV 11-ID-T~
r"v? [it?4 t" 7m1 K it "li t39w1 ).1f 23K1 .'In ri X lini [r'l r 37
ID3 K " t"17 Il 4N 1NX21 ".1 Ni 0 41" t IID W inw Ptl i1flO 43-1 40
Molyw'l li'Mill :**31 111213 jV73 ry n"111-- 4-11.* 7"11-71m xvill
nn$ 1ia nt b vi n intWE nwv min 'i 41'131 NI'W ttt4V 0Il,146?1

117 W f1t S'vm T 19 136T ri1in m ait 7v 9*i -*rwmnz m irnn vf


prs-9' ovbv1"iv *1 Inwv v671, nnhmn nW r11 rm i3t1:.'u o 11 tMZ 45
JI~ntl t)1610 jj'ljjV WW11tKSl XTM -)n r1uT1 :9"z 42 T"3 9- ftiti 'OD N'lli
n11 jjj ?$ CV 3W711711 t0wfZ0t0 1 2V 99:t ) -11 43 Ij:) 9?n4 -1)ngft y
tr'Tim 132"m t'laliu'rl .11N ?n=1 on m wnri wnl? lip S rry xl" - ,11

II N V713 [W-713113 11 11-911- Tl131l 33 11 N 7772 [772. 32 11 1 2 N 7'1-1'7l 14'3-Z3711


11 = NX71Y [12 A 1 3 D? 0 = 112 9 bt.1 HVV [X 35 111 = X -7t" [Nl7 n-Tls 34-35
ti ['10D 40 111 =N t'TN 17" [- 39 11 1 0 Z3198 ft8 ii1I =1 m mi2m In7-131 37
11 X N3li l 1 ' ?li Vl3;1 l 49 111 1 " -1 N; 45 11 1 illn [nl lnn 43 11 X

"Nil .11=0 VIDM VIVIN11 I'll!)= Im"11 ''11 Imn 1 2 g1 m 1Z7vi ... ( 17: 1 )n llr 1pirr
.(Mn9w mmor10 o n1 11 11"-.) M-7 811.11)17 X? mI ;Iinmi D 1 .t NT
.fl4'7120 Nrlo0111 r Imb t 'DZ 12 ZtV 1"N 0 J MV 0 ?nIV3,1 DN rilKhlt ?"1 39
-Tt ?"I) mn t3l1llo 11111 IMt N hl := ,1011 ,Il0 bt1 ' N1PBMN? 013-o 40
11721 I-its -Ts":1) 1 31-2 t34-172 Pwwri n w-mi ft r x r- 1 (Ts= mri n nilwn
?MK. Itr W so ?17bKfl 'M 1K 1 11ri inK NmM =n 1.n .., 1s3Zi 'K 1.0?W

K1P2
In ; "OVn3M
Obt3? MVM Z=
111- IVK 1 n=I
t1PS 31 " it
li .017- V'31
M=l=MI81tV
1N ?K tW
inK P.7=$11
1-7tV -MIP90
I111In

111Ml1 "ri .My1 Wi lli KM1,1 " 1 17 in fl Ofl 1 Mfm t9 w K Kj1p IV I p 1 421 4 -T.1=
.. 0, b IN'K 1K T"n WU D X'1n 10113n
2t271 1041 mll %? nnis ' 0ml t341 O' ll 1342b?273 11"nm jjntrj= 1Ti 12'Wt D JtVO :- ttt 41

.34 , V1 1Il 42

mnj? m8vt nin nrsnrwmnn-in -,) nK -Ni.*' "1 43

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[65] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 65

S1?3 X 1311311n nznll 31 1"1" I13t ( 121 b 13MI1 10' 0197M


6,111t 1111i167 V3?3 IT'll0"O3 t 031 0" 9 3l 1 V 1 081 3I tftS 'N11 0
S111$ l't' 449; 3' 0 0 1ZL8 D'92 * 3 Opis~j~ltlN 31'3 5f
l4'j'ltj?161 i 1 13 3 13toV 7 -gj 9 $17 N 09r1 4D 3 1j NY 131
viv MBRU 1ti 1 *pit tvin ,liw ?n l;1b 1"NV 1*X1
Nt '3 1171 N 'X 126', 1" ? M 17i 1"M 3'13-1nn ,
,1*X 61ft tlbl1 W 113 InX 10I N ?X ' 310yr n 3 '11viD i in3 nev
niit DN1 i31mi onni r- 1vn ftuI nwx vn 0 A un ?m
I"Ol 1 1131D I "InK ?n Nlll-n 1 31X; V X T7 7,1"M l 3
13"Illi T l i"Ctl"' W I fN" Cft mx rrnn vcrm r mr wri n v 13
'I WC2 njn'0V? j t no8 ';7 IlblIA01D a 45sll 6 8I7 In Inj n 13
kLl 17311-74 tL6 N 1?VM i"39 ' 1 wivit trimi rr *? -nl m
46*n8n1n ni ,-l 'i 0m1n3 r1nm nnThl W01, 71 173 I), 1t6D
Do 01 ?* vi97 voin, iR x1 n 1ixqY nw-pin 1m1 .-nivio nr1
t nn1 9 3"tr11T wirr TVm -7y owor i 3 -i1nrnm in
i1t- nwvn ?y nnnn17 Innin 3n 'v*m9# ',i jn2 p3 Nt
?1u 17', in nn t 'r T i fn D urion ,1niv 8 ig ?z 1 y
j 7n1 111 yviq 3 -9n r n 31 (;l"fiov 1in 13T ft1r) iiyTr
il41 ;in t? 13 f' 'ol n1t3 3T - 1 N1- Y"71Y? I-P pl tX* 1"
4aijpnn m1ti inn1 n Dn 01 wbrin n3xv1' mr yn 1WCvW 1
so50 Nj 1-ft ft)V X 1 31 4,1 %Ty V11'101 167 ?Dn bi?1 2 1
i I winnn [Im 1wN 65 11 2 NM 1 '9M' [I 1''M 61 11 1 ED* [ ,0-f 57
M1 N [N100] 70 11 1 MK'17W [1,1M 69 1 2 112W? 1197 67 11 M I Kun b [-flmm

.2 ,-In I-In10 44
.ri ,U D bit
.n ,1 tr mfl 46
.03 ,~~it3 n b 47
no0. nv 113 jr-rs : 9 ?ia*m niniw I-,= Irmm Un 13n ;I- ,111-11'3'on 48
m z -rnm risni msiri minn minvni xN~m rixi~an ml~n imm 1,4m misnrmn~ nnx
tw1i0,o
b fTOmwn nn11002
V NW n ix-in nw1iY0
~11K't z 'In
~2IDWB
f flKnxK ib p'1
V 10Z ,-Irn 4n xmv '-I
f1'?K912?ZI '1 m3im
.0?fl91111
fltht
.(K ,M? - K ,M1 nI ,1858 11=72W 010-)
,? 11 ,'lit 9I7V ,nl'91b t 1'K1 f 'l . ' #-In V Itfl ?NZ K 132 Mn iT 49
M1I i 31K1 ND'lZ n H6 N7(m..." :(K -"2) t f ii fw lit in=7 Nnm ,=-x
(D-p 1I) MW "3'TDW 13M '21241 =1- 11" 3'71 31 ".1.1 'Mi t3=2 13 t11'T 11731

NW111 r"Y t=1YtU9."]**03


909 1,2 fl1t
lInnb 1'; ,1) D'
?"9 '313170p } tX9S
133n 02 '1N15
1' 5N
.8 ,11 ;7$10 ; * ,29 f0 13 so

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
66 ALTMANN [66]

.0 9"14 DW2 11i '1113 PN; 002l IIn~tg11 ' MAD I8# sl 3"iSW (i ~19 J N 0311'

1N`iR Wl 52: " f g fg .0, Nfig 91 gigg 1 318 jp


Hnn M 11%Y? 1'7 '11 t~l1Yf 74XV J?R Inj 53'1 ?DRI' 57 H'InI111 =Wn "VII 75
NE 019 D~ISPin DBr t'N'2 198N *DA ss1~i? 1 NPTJX Y1313 )9878 tl inni 75
ninm 10D Hill Iftn tIln 1m *ITin 'n" x1mv trinnn nivinm loinn
nwr '0T I l" DW 6122ml ilN zf1 173I 114Imn it? Nm 7n5l minn m
WC2 DW$lmN innr* Nbl rmM iin r1it wj i 31nB ni n 9939 ninwr
,*1v1 tripz n5s i3n nn72 n 1 mi mlItu ImsB n" 88 tr1n 3 m 4tr DIv
7,1w 1 v1 0iii 1 pinv t ftry nin1 b$ 1TI It $n n 31 nv pi rm '11R W WI 80
n1116,1 POWMDW 1 3 Isilt 11""l- u b junv 112 twi3 BD 17 Tv NI m t 1 p
1*D"7 R"M 091*2 13#9VVll m111=21 III X611 Mlp$ 161 InIllM tII 1*1Y' i 't6 N*mn
D N13H ?Wt * D" V N4 W Y1NSW "ISIX 1= 1 7-9iX ' 1U 1M 7111123 rlinyl11
11ny1 54.(1Iol0 II) t09jJ1N S9 nil67 61- 1 -jj'4Xj ',J7jy TNW,. I3D I
MITNW161171 T17121 0 1 331 "ItV 7VV TES *3W ( nXT 173113 11720? 4n= 85
111-711 %V Wnbinrl 1M t PIn WI t14tt I w 0111j3P4DXl IT91nil '".0 "D M1i TINmil
m1i'1 ?n31 $nn 111 iun ft=in kht wm133.1m in tull8wn nwft? m? t m3?
NR23 13'46'?491Y T91M 44 I=B 'UTI1 1 N11 55 ts DWV 'on i"ti "DW17 71W?

t'1'5Y Dips 89U)'131 '0> 01131 n9 nlllx 5 a1 lnI M :6138 -169 t'6
D *MDl 1,12 19WR 13t"11= 1 W9.=1 6" "n In 131W91 tli ".(,1 1 90
v9D 13= 7t61 VD tlli }*nD 181il l'm0D 1WTV1 P44 0 3Ol n1 1 13190611167'l9WNIl

K N~K [1 I1 i1 a Nl=1ivi [m1lt , 83 II 2 1 1 i 1M I [IT ~ I 77 1 ~ 1='I [Y1 ZV?3 75


['1%111 92 II 1 21 11 t [KXd 89 II N 1XT [WIfl1 85 11 2 N '31K 11 I 3' 84 II 1

.N ' ,) 7'l-':I Hn00ln ;M , 4"1'11)0 jtV2 51

o1wT ,K1NT r 1 ?K1TL 'i f 1mN 11Km 1ir.lm , ll~ "0 1 5 '0 52
A1 ,"M17T,71 711 01"Yn UT KK1D370
.N ,X 3 67,11t) 53

pin b 3t1 0 -1 *1vn n 1j 1 131mv mnivinr ta 0w 1i' :* 1 t Nv Hit trm-rn 't 54

.(N ,P ,t4tob t "it) 2 ,it ,55UDVBA ;1 ("1 ,1I 130 ss


-T.I=Hm1 XN ipN N 1Ntv .11 mm? mo.l' mr 1 1nm 17?23,vin -n18 (NHM) M11 s5
wim ity no-t2 mm"-l jirT -mmn= ? 1 0 31=o 81 'inT; 7 minv? rr? n'm-l m1r1i
911 Mt: 1,-I mi1r l N ;'1 xmin 1 1 "'rin lin lporr 1 71 -I= X-1 2 7"s-) 12 (tiltv)l

.)01 -Vl12-7 HIPTilNDII RNlin (912n") '9121HH-

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[67] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 67

vi" Wfl
flZ m1* Cti
1W. i [9in1'13
3 01183 u Tir
j#"? mn [nini
~1"I7W 9 0
f 'l?1 ribm i
f 1Z 7f

11" tr i) 13ri, 91) .'1 1 afl" 91t7 '#1 n 7NKx ii at


[ lni tI"=z rn 14111 ii KnD2n xi 5bli t rntN Nrvi, (nim
61,(iWm
61.rnm vr-ing
iri N n 7r9@n
inV31 ? mmi * 1v
w 2 TW nt mist
62 mix mirn?v n)swio
wis n ?-mwm

;inV161 617 63 ftjt"j -"D 'tOD n1-1pi -14%1 "ntt i frli nwN -11 .r i. 11 100
.tDB 1o ' ftjtt '16i -0'26 es(jtx njfit 1) pt)6% 7141 640tW -V 3 13@ ?%S; , T I10D

Nt :1 0ai1nr1 zi*1n 3 1-7n?ni jawir niv no ivbio'"Dn mbiN aamo 3 11,


Thin bl%;m -,in '13" 1 ibi 01mn trim ' r 1n 131wn ?v minrimw
NW1 *7%7) '131 In uy1 :v" m msn un-7 ris -,to 'ni In3 t31 66.(fTin

Vit'l El*[i 38 II 2 11 1 N $l X I ll-o95 111 = 1-122MMI 111VDIR2 93 il 12 13-mm 1 m 13-73m.

ii11 mvnins Issris 99 111 = r 1-min h110 3 97 11 X '= -) [I'T X 1112 7" 1'2 [J "'* t 96 1111
In1-1 II 1- im 1-110123 11 a'1:1 [*1I 105 11 1 = Xn11l'12?3l -12 1 1 11 t =1 II~ 3 l11 104

,'fl lNZ~f ~"~ 57

j1;7419) xIUP ',p Tib I nt' ? ll 1 N, ; K ,of T? ltx i ; ,nT f112 58


.(3 ,1r ,,nv

.56 7#11= 144YV-59


.Dt? ,'ttbV ?3 4l160so
avi-17 71aK Znmm' Np-i rn- Kwljp t*vi- 1 KZ I 1"K": ,t0 ,m"ip lR7 t l1, 61
11T MST ,61O1V ." "M 1 1vn3n N Im lm? lW -ip N viipT -Itvv-T 7"flT 1pM -21

M717 4 TN1 t b 13l-4 :)1 1V = Zfl E 1 '11 3110 11n l- 7 "'t IN l t, l1 13 -111 1 1 l- ?

p'l b3 'm-1 )1- rrjym -172nn r- lomNn I-til ,t)ili min ?r .N imn ,013
. .8N t(WltP 11 ;V; .(N ,-= w DoT) 1v0 'D ,o mmiiion p1rinr
1,%3 V 7 62

pnh ,(l"DWE oC'rr11) t0NpKl0 0101 ,11*V1 11 1 fV? 'lb' 0lZ1 071 '0 63

V2 111T p Y' 1Dv v B:(K,Nj ,11NK 0"t) K,- ,0 N ,131 j"1r0 ,1T10 '0 64
t'St3 7"T219 'N W113 '131102 NWtW 0.lK NKZ 1 K0' Nb WK? K i0 K1 KlK
mN rq Nnzftam -rnv- (pinto) lb3t: pWm ?%: mmirn ... 7tirl P121T 'Tbs 7-1-im
....nK' EN~~tl' 889981 8899~ Wi~t3 NVDB 810 1
1 01 WN NW '171 : 3-1 T n"1) '41211:1W= 1741-7jM ?N...p TY DW :1W 2 -65
mmomn so (man) gb (tl!-) -I"3;. I"'t=IY prmlz p re tw ;m (jp@nrom

,m 7-PlmT1') rinxi =wrr trnwn ?zb m 01 1Wli V N ltiw DWN: 66


?w mmil m1riw: rivxN-im rim-miN mrW 01mn82 11n-9 1 3 -11231 p Ts 1* DN (=

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
68 ALTMANN [68]

ft'ru mn 3oD 3W INtftwa


'I 68,VIjqg 713 1"13ftl Vj n
711601t 17W }1l 69 ftjl? 1
Nmwtm ?mft 'Ism n19n b
;I8~ '90 3 31 f'I i ;3 ;l8gf
m1m11n1 at91n9 -rI? 3115

ahi DW%~ 1*Ntt 1'K1 ;Im


,i?? 1* nagni N 1t6 D9 jrn
0I0 Iirv 1"4121 ribm 7a1
Dirinn, nomi o min r-
11 1" v 1i DStri- & 1
mmn imr= iivi viI~i t6
0t3v3 72 ?1w m1 (nm1p1

773 jftrftllt? 4,1"U "T


M2321t 1116227 11-T-
101vo n 18 pIrT ilm 8

7112 [f171 1108 II Ilni [1 11

Kn t3 nn ] 115-116 11 1 =,-
t7n)VMV [tl3WmbB~D 119 11

[113 122 il 1 N WlM [).1V 121 11 21 N "'1 ["'D '1 120 11 1 1[1't M9 - Dl] 119-120 1ii 1 m b
SKnlmmin n m0 "mnm nn 7'rn n 4T b 17K1W" ,1m.n "11 o " tP'n w, ',, ,mnilmin

IPrL a3V ;;190 8n..."MM n3ll .91 ',In 01r 2 1XMIXIM 1II: tru Nrimn xt2m
,")n11 minm n in 1K Ti3 ,:...Nmni 'zn III= ,1tn n,0 n=
j01%V1 tV' 'I... t-"j19: U1o - =17n W- l ,10 11 ,DID 6713 K11/7 011 67
DTV'l W Ml "IMD W Nl'Im .Pl71M 114-T "On 11MM 011n1-M N 'nSim nrlil7n nlrrn
,:I n JTM1 t3XD II MM 1 t3" 1 TV IN 17,111 ... t0192 Em3i1- P "?i*
.a"139 VTnN NK1 (K

"iK"V pn129 1 .(..K012 m) 1 ,Tr (n0 K91 r n) K , K1pn1 Do n68


.( ,p , ,~ D'ODWD D"T) ,1,0 ,C'ODWBM; Dl,p,", l;Ili 'l 69
.K , 7`1126l1)0 70
.3tW " W1 T 4'1;1 ; K ,N "1 71
.3tv tV'j-Tj W -I2 ij1008l .- ,=? t3%- =- 72

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
69 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT [691

mkiym niio310 worm ?m viaNur n0vnftm 0 K 8"K1 .1t


Sv xin7 b"oin ur01 7 1 pm m13 riv m? t Y 3m mot W
?X R1V url'10,11 ;mMIlD 13O wl V mit 'n ftin-VIV "IMM 1
"Imn- 3-11 Wrpimav 1231 -,,i p mn?? In3 t9n 16 17m
53 inli 1 '1?2X?3Nn 7%j 73 "?- '- -j?3%Vj -, 1f
112 #16S416f j7WjV rn t8 t1jt0' nX tn?;921 ynl'7' 4blT
822 N im 5H ;In $SWt;l~fY; ;318 ;l -v x 1 1im
7nl mh DtS1; r1oi mv-1m, ro1rw minpC' 0 nw inN ft
-7v nsl, M t 0$wn r nsp zv8vn mT1 n mt 1 8 1 - p3 l
rib iinn nor 4jln? lu~ri nvlo wim i i z2'vu rinnn ri
l3t1o3 N1 #91 mko tNl xvin Iminn mitl n,1 110 nnyi mu
1-1- m, nni wnin lmi W t myif r 76m rin 9 br * m mrnin
Nr 1 iumm 1 mbr i ,10# SWANT NP NWr8w mT 12 xvirm

,132 77.tDV? 3 ;',IVV' X? r(1tt BD 03nt017DI hN 'mm N?37 i'n


m-li n tal7*% %D? rmn ?11 =117 19Dn 6i I73- im

Irm 11149iN it DW17 W" Di ."m 0 18W ? ill" 01 NY ?3x 92

7'TN 1N113 V -12 'IDKtNW 7' *3 12V 7n ?71 78.117PE jI

[nnl=m II X [ n 1 136 1112X - , N [171 132 I a wnb Ill Insp 13"? n

IV ,1S j ,' i17" 73


.64 M"61 1"'1 74

.306-290 ,( "6-wri)) -T r'%t pn ,"'xl}Pt2 l2lrt"' ?l2 " 13 t ,0=1? '1 rjV -1 Vi 7s
.n ,1 Mip1 " b"V 76
.1-iznn i"- nv (Oin ,w ii 7816now = It ,1141M 77
7 ,'91?01n 137P ,1"2Z1 Til1 r .f1r T ~T1OI M T? 7W 1?Z1 1 ,1 ,2 T 17V78
n1E2i 't ~3Ir 1MW1 unt Inx? 1 ' (930 MM ?W03117M ?-") HIMW 1 3 1" : 0-1

l'11~,~,lY m'l 3 = 1btD TI? 'IM,"- promptuarium-,-1 (tV1n-tj t l t D -T 7 ;toP brm


Paul Volz, Die Eschatologie der jiidischen Gemeinde im "Y .t ,' 1,'-1
neutestamentlichen Zeitalter, Tiibingen 1934 (Hildesheim 1966), 257; 264;
Saul Lieberman, "Some Aspects of After Life in Early Rabbinic Literature,"
Harry Austryn Wolfson Jubilee Volume, English Section, Volume II, Jerusalem

n in -j ,"l-m7"n ' ,' r ,t , n nll-t r 1'sjv)b , .1965, 501 f., note 41


1K .X'11173,1 11a= Ml117= 12 61WH ,"13IN"M 1`W ,0 3311 IN=L X? 7'-TwtUv rnOwl
,MVII t-t2tOM ?V- 1IMV 11tv I-1MR 70 13

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
70 ALTMANN [70]
)T3 1'8,I nm r '1 r ln -10f
11'7 so 6121it l NXli17 -' 'i
',1 Wit 13YI, ' In 11lVSI
triontim) tm,* m fnirr w

im fiT tK1 NkD 1 'Z z ,

jZ'fi nnL V1VZ 1zNf 82rf o 0'tv 9 9r ov mi n nm 4iWiv


w'D 'D i$ ,0
11olmst 6TIV .6311WH8n n2lixi nlawlr113m i31 X.N il 61m R-N3 x
nn3z r1'N

1mmini 11r7ip riv @11v l1 ,iis7. a908 ,3 83, 1"216 {W1;TL'?-n N -#l ft 1'13y 1 3 14y
1139~3 NW 01 9l'ltN'; ;'1; ;13900~ TESTS31 VB~ DN1 In01111 Ki11$ 0 11211
riv l arxnl [149 Ir m 145 ii n,,nv? 1n67 [rzttr 141m twin v 1 5o I' nv
011=72 itm t11 17t2 nnqn 51ro 111 yut 8vivil tati m 1ni- vli19 w 0Ir

$N liy 3"099 a hIY;sr 00% t ?Int8 11MW n 311 nl 08 3" 0~t 11 l'~wED15
,rrr if D 1 mi 7triro 2 p Tirm T 1 "xtmw rirym pvw'n n1in*
1'113Nlt ~f tlSI1;I~lr~nl ''1.1 6 n11?2 1 61 1t 1 " m1in ktynw ju m'7

worm 11wivn ftiW* t $"imin Iv n,,my? 17D B1 -i tiW mW n Im11381 4 #


im rNatt m1 ta oto vomm33, 021 1 irmm vm ; jpt m m i m1 wn73

II X 1 ['710 E 3 149 111 lo0n1 145 IIua= ri3nm [n?3tDb) 141 111n3p i [NU 111 rir ml
X 11122 [1IIN 152 II N1 kXStn [InV17 151 11 1 V'02= [1IMr-i 150 111 ?p [ [tvz
.1 = 07

.= ,Jt2 l l"Il 79

*1 114 711111,10 ln X,~f2~~~b ~ tt~


. , 1 1 170 80001D ; 1,, ,t ' n Jt,- 711020 ? 8

,111 1 1 Help ' .,..17php -100 mi nl 8tw 'o 1V


17-nl- : In ln?-IvnIn 7 trim93 3 1 71-'31 2 1-3 ,1- 11 , r"
irrorm mirm -tn wi ivnrm nsl? InN Itum TNm ;T yX1- Nipi "
Inm'921-m InxD t1 ? Int a-Ib pir ptn n-m lW73"1 772 Ini 1or

n11Nl? 6112 1: H 1V VU n ll 17-7 NtS9 NX 3"nR1 ...mit l=


t0r17i rinswnl iwn m1 ? nm ... t0r21012 tt80 3-rMWl 3-1231 17m1 MV- E
117 nkrl Irm ,1732 ?Ivnmn~ nimn m~~nm -72n vio,? r ll-P ;114 rinn
~lt l 911- 2171W4DT $2nm l 9 nl??nn mrxv -,-12 117 74mv nv
0*41o Him, Z311m-1 tnili i3bm 13717 31 WWvt %li3p1 -lu JWin xllm
-1*tV w 7-116711 inv 11-n 7}101nn 3ri *mi ivn1 wrinn rvinwm mirm
nbNmv? ."t DI 091147 nl* 1-17 0031 N311W 13n '1m 1 " l tST IW
.201#11117, ,400 ,211 'IM1 ,Major Trends ,t117W.1 110t)

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[71] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 71

'1 t lf n"t, 7n1 t 3nW s184.flom i,o l D r 1


61 '=l 1i 86'I :" --tl 1nj 10` . '1'.KI %VD2-,j ( %42 3Y9 ;" ft n21115.i1t 85 Z`I3,
"D bNko b 111V1 "MV1 WDVI WC 1 @1 V%12 8 "M99 Ci D$ pN 0l N i3 5
trim-1 "f I1kN o13tl1" nD-tY 131 1n31i w ?v In voi vir W m u-17$ I3 21
will N 7,itt 1DWW $D D 11 "riT1 ?i= 1t3m ;in 0 'rr3 it109m
X'Tji,. XNr4NTD) 88 '13 l nw0n f1nxr1 i-l? rD, 87 n1313 12-1.1 1'1? t34??Dl 172
Kim1 t ~flm fltl 1rTm? fll T"N1 ('i W'1K01 ron "1mt n8 fl' p T1?23

,oi1 T3 rn Nz lyl 9 0 .?i r ltw[ I12 pil K irm n- - 1 iMo 4 10


I -.n "mv 1?2 x"-1 1 01 21$ 1n'1177221 90n*114:= .1"7 "D 11.1%V '072 "11 DW:
'11703 'W 1110R NnDn= 111 Iff't1 No'rr NTmy 1 "1 E mim `11)

II1 a W-110m [W-11072 11 12 Nx YP m Ip IN 12 11 R -11KI2 NW3 111 [1"-1371- 1*911 4 4

.9102 nlm 4 "I ,;I'l1in V 17j'11D1 s84


'12111?i K1?t 'l' 1i'1311 ' ,1 NKVz" 'ID Dl "N" D?"lnT1 .37m1" KN' A =Z w .1'1" as
'? ,("W Vn vv,Iv noK v?mr "=*1 -, l ~ ,'rln *1mp'~DN ,1ibDrv iVnn
-N- "n1 '7nm
',, t l13-,nut 11 It1;if21
ri rT? w* , 1,-D .WtM171
7'I M "m
'7 113, "1-
132' V1WWI
"" -T iI3TmND
17- D , ,1D
'1 D-I Z MW ,Ml ')M W'- .39-38

.T132 fin

.23-22 'I1Y ,n IT ,Y0 (NY 'Z) W 12 M "IN1 '1P1. '" D"MI, ' 12 3 ("M
K11I3 $"I) 19v iv0 1 j2z'1 .. (K p 11 ,N'lW)?.2'9n ,-" TK1?ZIZ
1'8 fl0V I) " 11 -K11
9- 121
KD 1" 2T n 87
."}811U DnN MI-MV i 13 2 NW (1lI1t28
,('lti3 ' nNV I) 7M 1T .1I7 ;VN" Ms }1 0 -Dtt1 ;3 ,MS 21 A i' DnMTp 89(

-1-2 Wh112M -1.1,1 K ) ' ,1DZ ' (1 w17 N r 00


n18Nmn1 i1 K 1 @ it :-#"S) "-m Z1":1 ,K' 1T ,'"1='Wr7r ,1r K Kr 7Z1'7,-[
NMI 0DI@DI 13-TI - W7M 1 b Wn" (M , n-T ? mi , z)1@ 'D m i mn102 m1 minn
'117 - ?D'?108 MIMI Wl? 200W3 (IM'I0D) TIN 1VWM 7-1101:)l 3 t, tin r1-1r1

lnr (m ,1i a min) imns libt ma i *i tr 1-rw72 1 -7-1% b (anin In pn-m


.1m17rom lbi rir1n int-ro v ninn iv m ? -1i:i -r00n mi1 DN .mm MpWn 1
MM Ini m11" I'tonn mm3 110mSW WWmvl Irm inr ?V 13n00z -112 81 Mi N m31
M1MMW10 '1i 1 "NSm n tn 1 C3,1= 1p 1 :M1 1 OmT 711 1 lnlv1 i 0 1) w-1Dlln
Itr ,m p' i1N ni 1twa) -1Dml-p in '1 ."3i-- 1 (13) M'JnlVWtt 0 " TSM -I 0'V

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
72 ALTMANN [72]

.K3D 1* rx .1* .1Y31blv


11123 ,L'CV 11T 19) }7s'Y19 I
1342- 31 0131 - 013 1P1
MVlll '131,11 93.-Iln1 n~nV
.trm N i vvnn 1m7n 70i
?zr1 11=2 ?n 8mr13n n
1in3i.911ftl ?x mN 81 *
jjj-) ,J t3- 0 1J2 n '3 t3V
13, INW 1312-11 W0271 ?

mgm tmn roi v193itn n


'ID ?Vn W*Z? 020 N 131
1= V016W '1 113 96 *#1
X116122'InX1 1, 13"I M -17301.1 J1VRI 13V 3I-,1 ')Z .-'13 DI mrir x b

.'131 nimDW'3 nip vNi'90 Ni'331 utiNfr xe ti'331 01m W2v tDv
t"Y T319Y N3)3~ NW 3";lff phi 009 1''NWt 59"71 11M~w Hran Dbit i
.Ainvl fivyl 1173mv ',-,I'n3 vblth 1311141-1 3 linl'on t Di P~llwm~n fiNNv i"1

.j 2 1 02~3~ [ ~ 29 11 1 [1XI-o II1 =N NIt mi [Nt n mr 26 112 N tttbl l [m0r1ml2

'181 80l m -immImm.?n in )I t) p rmil '=-I: x, in 9,-7 Wr ?%V1r virl 1-,I e9

,DW ,mv90% vlJu u .0l tN ,r-1v mn innx v irm 112'* tl M2173 -17 I-'I.uV no1l
.mim9 '-1n n illNm; wr113Dn tonriv M "'n lW W1" N'3l N'7X3WW ,54 '`2
%wo ?? -rium 'nm1Nw1 1-1mi m1nitur trrlrnn :.0 ,t= -T ,n1-7mr .1i )%Vjn?
,?IV Ipi n nn zlsim ; n*pn 1* mm-Inm ;.v% mnimn ... (v" ,11 ninw) 1"ID
,1212 N?31rllr; TZ MR ,Kbv 'n H? Zlnll %V61172 6r1ol -...1"M7 73 B TiK "DI D
M'M'j??3 'In" t31V ,'fIMD1 ;InDV "UlptW -,o ma 'C31min tri-nm .= ,ml I-r ,Ttt Nwn
IP412 '?ntV In773 In'71W n"M 'M HIM il 4D 3 M-'1-Ifblt18 " 9 2M?'T2

I0 ,6 11%V4 94

.(H ,fs witbDm ,?"T) =' ,17 ,tvlowrw1; 1 rl1b 8 -,?-- it D-17 "y 95
:44-43 ,(1"-n-i tm Vw11 ,tw rrv mirri) irln n ,W1rm M n 2 ,mmvprYv9
r" MitWN mi 321o8o llbrt nit NXW tO lb }2 Mani -in 4 (p"'-1 -1H nm
...}t" l'' iltT }1981' I''St I'*St fl N~p t'102 I'J n \si}*70131~18 1 WW
,773ln 74734 -1n11- 7 Si 74211742 11 773m .m'1m1 " 73009 71mill mn-li 79137 mn
, 711n999 ) .173 7110 ?V p-,?1n mr73"-= ulon 00%0 "b Mu1 l 101 miDil 97
101" '`1? M1111 '11 'M SM (20 -18'73 ,72tp7? "'I ;51-48 ,41% V10 ,Tllti W
')j _?Ti 8 M l'73 Y"I V-1 JIM 23.11 J7 "- 4* 7 17" '1 nAv n-ilm-" own x'n
.(19 ' -,72V tpi tv ,p 12tr"$ iv

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[73] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 73
t.11flK fll n K v'vivW 0 r1 1zN ?ivK 2033 ninrn

in tN r n-ivx i -m 1im1 Pti- l Wpriiirw nim p z ;n'


t l "n m vmm. o Vwn1W 1mv K fl Jnfin llwn nti 1f

a'i v"N 7-lt N Wtn rf tb 3x 9 -" m xvlid inv-Y5


x5731 N "K 0"K 1t"vnni in 13 " N x1i .flK J 1i MZ7 K
iW WC~mW rin9 ri1 13r w r 1i1 rInn f pvi3mmv inn 1P

r21j9 1;11t83 3 119 t3-tnn W 5niml 'it0n t4 llnn n012;


199in-ipu rrzl N npirt .ipi 7 mD 1v f 1 r3
i'ini n313Ki l ibm rinw rl 0 0 3 131"V %ll w 1r vin 1 2 l
1I1, 1003 ;"fi{ W11pi~ 3n3 731 .099th~ 10Nftt7r tDB
172; '3 0 p~i~j Z 13 1 70n f' T1t ;'1 11 tt
'# '-7 'lD 1?ZKA '7?V1t* NFX173 2 1 7 1"3 ' r f 3 6"1T 1TZVT 1
j10. 313 71 s.'1 1 rmx0 K91 1n x irnN rri Wtll 5rXr
3 '9 7 'n znN r1ip$1 x019 0197 0197 6: "fK
nrlTIS? '02 J3ZI 111 131nnl 01 nl l Inn 1330 InDO 135
;Irp 1"inti3 *5 13 s,)l N.'91 tall 781 7' 71 :9"t1 D
1 2 NX 1 N inT [InMI 6 11 1 H [" ] 11 = X W 3IWtR [Wzv[ 5 11 1 Z

r mianfln [ninn mi 17 111 V' II N [ [t 13 11 191 11t

.2= ,1 ')lK 7 D"7 2 . ,1 1 'a m


v ,-t 1 ,m-win 0 vutiD ?w ia 01 N ,m xt1 ,71PA" rll-X11;
1"nto lly An nuM 1111114 D1"7-T-m v 11V DW~I 10 011 -urlipmin 1 nl: KIM X01111

.Dbi nt E1C2 BD 01(@ '9900r 0190tV'bib VM'3~1 1 0 73 1t8r


, 1412 In9 73) n4U-l MN 1,-17A -1 D-T-40VNZ ,H171 IMN 'I -11-1 'J '717 7 ?Z3 '0 4

k'1 009 K1 'I 1ln 1'r J fltn 'lTflH $11n itW 19'1 $1f *D' 1K19 r3wi 1nflN 5

;3'11 VB 0~ nltsat ulrt 113D'~ inN n0181108 0221001 i~rl'SWE tlS9K '3 09013$1
."hnn 800@3~ $1900 (81'DO $"1)
.K ,j TI ,C 6
. 2 , =2 :) 9 7
DB InN ,012 "I7 Jn2 1 11 f1 17 ltI K VD3 tVT 11 :1 ,flZ T1 ,Pt2 8
pll nllU3;1@ 7'I303~ 11YZ NVWU tlDB~'p 0 nWC9 1 (t ,* I rV2 I 1) 1?ZZ fin
ttNl r inx,73 btNl 17 l 0 1ti r- 0 7.1m '71- A12=l i*M1N ?1 473 3" M 1 r Stl=M 3"-
;1b> tN '> D~Y'SW10 n'1WC297 Im1 831?2 1183' 133110 00%~ t*8 '1131 02N .nN831'
muzl 1101 4InnN mst riar -'8 itut rib'uN mmor2n mrai u1ti'1 1 Ik
....it$ uan nlo 11DB ll '1V" 7

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
74 ALTMANN [74]

133 710 Il"'libil 9,3"@$u


mi$ nim 11*.'1l1 fl11l w
r"y H"ll0 NWg1 (plzl; NDS
3N -1131n )Nt)mK a131 ?.
.41.1 ?O vDwI ( 15 7 1 t1l-
t WINDl ZX3l 1811 WtS
yl* .7'1n 1 1)y;3 1 Mt N Z'y
HNMI VNl 10"171 ttVD1

NOW nZ7N 25 11 12HK1 9tSK

1113m -* 2 0.1231-,P " DN m-no


-1? :'231 111; DNM 1 29W 3?
IM -# -"DIini K; 1,nwn 1-in
"-Y WV'11 D3'iLtm 111117 w
nn? v ?M-Ivj ?nhw ..1 0 f9

1-mv) .7xnl '07n noinp- 'on


t11'D1" MVI, ZIMM= W,* 0M
.ml?-ltxjp s 1' 'j ,-i 1mi n im
.2 ,aLb 7D ingib~' tND
TW'I 1317t' DN Y'IN; lly II3 P
9nnC3-1Dotl"01
~n~3P n~l~f .= 'INI (ImNW S
9-m nni-P
zivrm
"fir imvi
Iniv" 8 nm
t YIm my119
r-imn sntm
7-Tv pn
-on { p m1inwn -mm mvimn

;III1PK~ ;11~ lannN Xtv n~

."r'1 f 0 m iN n
.=-b ,X) 1- ,`Ijo

.}pir t'1tu01t(P~ll
1iT -nT1 7131W
7 ,impr WDN
7-nii
021 mi0"{11NI~n M T.12-
IPm"M 1 718M3 71nT 7"7 f'1
"Dn ."N-1PD "Mi ' IIM D 11M
.1n.4 nD Im 4m tNTv phiV
7n MNT-rva M?Ti n n1 08 N
,nimm ."...f1v t Pl ni vi Im
01872 WW, l(bix ~u n13tt3 tm
.18001l t]0122 1N82@t

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[75] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 75

111 lpanl gn ril ar r N DEnrb 1 1inx rall wi 01 N


9190 StTW1 YSW1Bt $NW tr5 90 WE~ Nlin 712 tt WWt~

M11.W1 "I11M3 wilyn mirl 01 i~vlM1 nntmn 7?3 ftv


,in 1 1virm vW m mirn btuNn ;*z v?-i nn m ip 31v -
990ov ivED 'v v rimnD 1 vO3 W Wp9n mN a, uTom ',1
X? 4D 20 " b lnltV 1471 ]T 3; Xll9 V InIN 1 l1 n X1 N1
1I71 1ann mlowltv 1-Irl vlmn 7D 1 ?. In 3 TN Z 3. 71t -=

nB 9 1-, 2 1341n !9p D"32 aDr #1311 l ini' jwW


Tn T1 ' DD? WIMPN 0 n"12 M117f?n XI -tl MTVI VMM

25 ',ftn? ivivin,93 241)? 134t3l)Wn -0 lon ' ff


mN N01 I n ?m .-1 1 min Minn mlyn - D Irm-'1 n13$1
r 1 1rin vf iv i n Djn. mwrn 1"M-M" 13$1 V1 ~p 081-.1D
wllv1 * ft'f'r 0W nxin ror in nsprl ll1z -s1393 . ft) 73* 1DU N ftlit 7l VAI3Y40
u2pm 1ft1in 2 Nioni 1birri n00 01 1v3= vfii j1un 1 nr 13ir zoi.1 0
"Sp~n 1I-InX%
2184 fiW1 27 N1310 11 1Xng
-,?1 9789 51 133
19 ftn tV 9@9PlD
minx12 11X3 P;IX f ffty
nininrin %ipy~qj gg y1;t
nnNrlN

111)It 1 33X 0 0 1*%7 ; MT17l7 13 11NW'9W NX1 Z31Y I11M16*10 mon


-InX? ?Mnn 6W3H 17'1-1,1 nj~j 13-l n njl * 287?2Vn 13?11 0 71X111O 1 45
'I'MM -9-121713 jnI XM2 t 22 1?7313? ? -lWM =17xn ift,71t10PISD ll lnl('it v'l~~~V

i11 1-T-.V 37 11 1 2 N 11 1117223 33 11 X N-11 0.=:t -"t) 3111 2 - M1 1 M -11


m 7mNan l [IN~n 47 1i I V tVN = t3*NM ['PM46 i1 1MIM' 10MIW I I 1bh1'"N'l 44 111 [W1-?2m 43

.12 ,10 W~ 16

. , 4 $ N 18

.rnpn ~3V 19
.n ,en ur n,t 20
'?n ,' pi?n ,T "P ,p1n7-) n p100 ,T "`=N , '=pi 7 "1 ,1=2 101~ i t W 1 21
.(381-376
.215-210 MnyT ,A tjt)D -jh mlnl 22
.1 ,0 ,1 N 'i 23

."'' * 6l7 p 'T N1M11 (,."7T) = 11f , 7" 124


.56 1"fmol ,66 'nl 25

,NtIDT317?
,flI'NK1 ,;0.1 Nir'1
'0 ; 00irh ,lI1V
invi
a0'l,-u;12
t mwfl1; ,T
n9 ",tD
- ; 'l',"wn
i np,'A"Wl"
,py "lt1' n1m v 26,

.M ,rip J- 73-- " ; r ,nTD j P-T ,14DODW 7 i3 -I1m 0 27


.=n ,Wn @14nl 28

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
76 ALTMANN [76]

"D '"JI3 W11 1'3 INSXI 'i


t1o-11 t3S0 f 3w1 .0010 J X
33 M10)D761 ID i 1*7""TI 'p
1N lt0195 N07 1NT1 42 D1P4
vTz -7n? man m-im -,ri-t
val'mm ## lonal b =5 17
1112XV j'J2014 31 b11l36-1
11,11"b11 0,1=310 '"1 %V" il"

'F 13O)1 5,431aftmi 1 vin


38 n5V -,on mr1ow o

'runni 1.1mom l 1xt9 ml -

M-110611 5D5 1332H '14=3


111 1C21 tt 113~r ;tN;li V2
IDDTr 11172w D it -tz "m
Nli v lv21l nWxnmi .1
Irr ..m:imn rftrn -im3 T

I : triplivi x040 }7"Wl181 7-

Wna .13 ~ ( 71,1ra 1W,,1 "r3 ,m".(N 21


ap,,rn01 "1n mnn ,s, ., .'.1 ,tD
nw1 n Hi*'? I" r ) ,
'D.28
.58 '0 ,I ' - ' 1mW 31 1 1"11

.38 Oill9l ,64-63 'b? 744Y 34

.N , 11 7 T ,9-r M li -'ot 'j tV,- 36


.28 MISM ,58 '`72 7 'i 37
.58 '73 ,'74V 744Vt 38
7mmv@ -nin Dimom prim -im rimn ' -Iim -iniv fI; 1-W "n9v -'ED t312; 39
cri8 iz :(K ,mmP D")1 ,T0 p"lT VZ127tfiT 7n V 1 p1? W'W , , SN "iWrnvM1102
.mnm1w1 In 103n NI P t1 ND3m fa nlin Nm
.( ?-)ip M1) nnt3itne a 1w72- ,Jf-1,P--7 0o

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[77] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 77

jn19n Do N C lo I(tI. lt "11" ,," 41.(,1,, ]tDD~


1?2y *3 Tl? N a4D JI1DD 42 311 u, 12'n $Nl Di
,o1wn n, m, tw ,-,V'DNx 44"i 1 '-D V Tnn 1"17n
4 6)t1ftl 11 Nf12 f31 4.(ht 113 TY) '131 tryin 1tw
Nx1n (nnM,%: 6T) rnpt 'iy1nj -it m n x rn tT "1 1"r, N

1"I "1T
rinio X.4y#
am 11m ax in 9o .Irm-9i
.1 11ftj 'I .t
l ntro l T "VV
n anvi 3yr'ij ifl Xf"l
1a CiN tr 1'11
1r iv37 70 47- ' : , 13 1 4j 1. 70

001a 4 13-11 ft Is S binm W1D "*111 awliv I 491-17t min 48atr rivin tv-tpv7%
ornit t9a . tVS t ?W 7j1?2Wj 09f1WJ tjoN?-S t iV ft2 119vniv 1?2
ftllD617 ofl 3YI I TIX~ ITTOM 13K"3t )IX-#l 7? 3 M1V2 M'4714 V311mv - 101mK
itworiv mpn ?= i33 arm litim t3'il-m sirm wri-m~t n'lwwi ml-pnion ?n invri(t-tn
.0 nt17 t31' )Vt~ll t3ti, OV-tt12 -l 662 1`2 ?"Tl "t2 4'3 n2v7 .312r 75
m"' DW 1373111,31 D31,vll ' 1146m tloll. f71 3 9# 'iYV1D 50so t3lnlt ', ll8tt N

['linN 68 1112 N bN KVN V 67 ii 1 12 f N 13 3 1-N [11,11'b 65 11I 1 xN r' [n , 64


I i m n[rin IMOa7111M K'73HN72[11N?3- 7011 11 MNO M' ] 69 1112 1 [] 1112 'iRK
3 T--1 "X K T"-302 ?"-I VT"[ '71 T"'0 83 11 [M V 7 [ 1 76 11 M T'M11 [t13 74

11102 1N111N isIt 2TM OMVI...rl 17 1121wr3p Nmwmpor mmiwz ri9 n w? p'91 :a. 41
mrm m m?-T 4=1 t2 rSWymo NxN m'ri m? in 1rDw nom .4m 13 01D7O 13"'I1DI
n'4 B72i rrnp? 2m1 ... vID0T 1";N NT ti-n 11 .1XI ...113DT v An ri snnmnNW
134'1 714n -1-T T3M -T-VI...(liW) N4 nI (NM?) M'$u N M-2 1-7p NM,1' Mr3Y OM
.'*Wln TOMu=D .11
.t , fl'Si ' 42
. C, 3 '07iln43
.H , Int 1, 61t V?t 'I 44
,tj31WrES I1DSIDS t3Vj Vb11 lo9 ll t 11 Cr 'SWI 13uDW7 V- toDID7 jjj:WNT :-H 45
171iv "Mol "1117301M 167,1tvImn InIN '=(9 1 -MSi*D 9-VID tPIP TS 2 ?V 7M11
1"n mINnt ,tlkT 1;*m irm mv 7viTN blt # x lnv i 7 1i im rv -131t W11 ?1Ibttv r-19173
flN 'bwt Nt 6 m1iK pnm ' 'n .-.i7f '71 KV1.i 0232@ D "vN w " iir'

nvz 7'4I 11ir mn in ... nipn p 1v* 1 ilNK NK fNl :N ,Km N-n7 x = 46
.... 4W-Tm 7l 7Nn in1n11
(38-MIZ-1,64-63 `23V -Ipimrm P Prm-T mvm11mT N -YN T,i rviobn"1 47
-TS; IM1 41 T1481- :=inn ow f.r10, D ,o in (j7-.) 1-mitr 49invo #:01.11? 112 $171m
( ,Tp j?"7) 1,Td P"r ,K'V1 ImH .NK nWK1 M T "T z pln- 13r1117 74 "rl n ?
....mn'Win ','T 1-172m" Dm 7 1M.1 .9T 71M.1-TW3 : 0.In
.NK1tn ) :'"T1 48
J.T ,vmv 1 .13m , 7'1122 721M1 7""j; tO'iW1jV 1W3 n tVbl nlib;1J t3'9j'7 S n74-14' ?JV 49
.(Av KM11 NKV)) D ,-1 7"2; K M p"P nrinD '0lit MN-) ."-'1V N1" -"1,7 , ,'7
.m ,1 450

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
78 ALTMANN [78]

,'4n' =n : inM m17 , i "non


.ni nn inimn i ~ ~=b- T
1Wtif "'1fl Yr K1 " ?rr
irywo* witv r1Sy #i m
*X UY fS 1t n13M l= V
M11D s11 1I- niln2 M1110
531313 ' N 1MNX DB 1t1
'N11=71W 1111N'- ?I3t %>
'IIX anK 1 11,111 b-)I-T
v'*L 0ti1n1im n v-Trf -1io
X: T1.7 721 n1n93-,l ?D 13
Naw 11- imi 191rw n11 N
89f8 t 9n -,n *Y10 O? D3
, 9D n13' N 1371 1'93 1 "Y3

56.14Nt 1-113 'lltN N? -Tin


-TY 4t " N 90X a ' 9M #n
0-1T11"' X3=W7 013-7 ?DM
inno pimD ?y i-inx In1.001i
1'313t W1'7 1 Tl *) jnj 4-1

['I11 10411 2 11?3N 01 1K 8

.x ,-71 I- X(T"-nWr tw1un


T D1 31 nt-11-pni-I - S?3 roa n
nri p11 ri n--li rimnium n
0010t1 NlTD M-67D "ID M W"WH
.00~~'l1 01DD~n 700 10N~ "i' a'3 PM
.N ,t' "l s53
."$31 0 119" 190Wa,, R ,N nlnVs 54
.INM ,1731 ss

.020th~ 1113 7-'4 M " 56


M.%1 V 18 2 : R-I vtn I nt 1o 57
0 'i15m N ri r13z .1..1 "ipn ? n :r3 ,-M in . 91 0 'i 1 n0 '31W732) u 11'r 7.1Y 58s
ni= 0111M.1... 6724D ,1i1zinn i 2 in"I inn C.43;v 0 tril inN JUN 7?3H .nvw7 73mJ
ln? tv'1817 1 ...?N'3 m Im .. bt,4- 1 ?Hvi'n ?iw* Inin rrn orri lnv 11iS D 0ptli 12
...D '-ilm, irris -rn ... 7-1Tv 7 mno? roD 3zlv... MI 1179ril tarra 4-lvv InnIDI
w'lpt =M?311 03 ;ipS li7ll j? ...inni-I3I mniw -11 nw1in Mv.1311

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[79] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 79
.AIMM ll;rT;rI::M W :0 12"1MV '172D 131r ',r , ;r'''Of

.-',13I 11711013 4N1 1"- 011' ' lr t '1 t', :"'rV W rr W l N t " (1 ,I7V
S1 K v [N17 10 9t 1 34m im " tan ['in;'1=": t108I Ilo " y n'- [ iu i ftI i"
61 0912t rp, n noyi tru nri 1m urn01 rPiwt aN 0tr 0111 im, to T 'in mri99
t1r31 l inn,'"Tt 3"D9 trnn W nnwan rl= in - 1 wx 11 vl XIti n it '9 100
t3'h1SX; 188' TR '3 N'l~~ni Div3W Wht 11 SWNK 11312 090a~ nD'Wi3 N
rqN 1 ipnm-1 1"1(nn Inni 18311-411 nal~pn 741m D 91 ni'inn1i
63 (1o-r-mr tr -,zvnni -1y) '1i1 t;?nn 7,imi1 62 :0f N rim1a}l 11p3n pioDn
-TW13 i* 13 111mD in-ij-pnai =Tt3 ninwri ?zv -3on trau *NWv, m? tN "D 70im 105
Plftr Frnm n"-n ?m ninilrin ninvan r ?zv I-#= I vis nnwin 4.nvi~tD
M1-0 170131 (C";-W? a-f pWi tIT IW 11 I 1W) D018'I1T '710 X1VII M111W
13VI--t2 'X3V Mn.1 X03 N "t? m311D 7-WN "D 7p27,1 .013= MIXW ion t101

. 11 X 1317H 1 13-1?3 109 111 N R.W I1M - 11M-112 108 111 . Y1? 3X [I?1b 107 11 1 2 X

In'n -1 ?31 11 711-t1 "fNlp1f fV2 fY "'UD' lDK VtZ'II f ln1Vl9 59


.14-13 ,1957 11-Tfl' ,(rn'.3Rn) " 'T-vr mv nnronmr nulm
.t , H' N '1 so
.17 ,tX N11*7 61
j)OD ,K"VD 0702071{ ,fl2bN 2V "'31 0 fl ' rl fill 11 VZ S "11I D VI an 62
.t' ,T

PO31D IN-Div 11 0IM 9P '313111 I*3n "*-n rv9v - iraD WSw1 m-riD V-4 V 62

102"M Hurl1117 n110 I 11101 (1 ,ri nni) ='lnl rrwil rnsmn l nr 1m1iM 63100 ;vTW
NnoD Nill 321"1 21 olwy nn T1 1 0l1 1nvzlp M V-10-17 '1o 1-,2n (K ,-) l'ifpz
132'1Kl 1VKWNl v fl f nZ1n1i 'T0h11 llim01 '01 W 0"Tnlvzfi 110 K11v 1 ;0' 137t10I
HD1K 61102110HI Ki 111 0flfl7 ,712121pD il m21 fll nl 1?13 TN2l .t"bD *'-1 Iw12 'On
m1ri ,-1*m nin= nb ."-rrntr zr?-?vwr .?Nmvii rinnn 1* nip -lrv$i -ivn
f i0 ' m = '1 i ,n - = ,N n1 ,r -r1iD , "wVf 0'V1Vr ,f00 'b mo iVlr b m I1'
nl '4 t1?MMnN M17 (1 ,T f100i) - 1M14 7 lNK iNisK r1im *4s" : Yrn'K l'lm-
?m 117nn wnn in-21 11v1 1uvw I(1nn rm-pm -is= mo-im sin 7r1"n -vrlDWmwl
N'K 0'' 17073 171121 1l1 - 12- iM M? -12-1 T0I 0M 1M OV lIfI 10101 MS 173 0KpX1?
rlKulo" 0 112i I '7141 Knl f fly 1lK Z0p 017i r K lnllm l ' n 0l0l KlW2 0 lz2
T'IDY ~I 31i9 12 P99220 JW 18Db 03702 '001 190@ 'ti~ '~bN TD WN W 193 NW2
.17M-p' NH MD 1 90' nn9l wWM ?n (m ,mt) IMt "IV 7471 ;.1 ,t-i ninv) NSW

7Df * Kf 1-3I V 117 i7 mil 17311V 71: '-1 0 .1-r 7tK .1m 71'3 OIKn1 '5l2l...
nHIM MM 'H10li V M141 t Zl ?2 12? l 3M 1 M 01 lK'D l 0 lO n lI Nl 2017 071
1DID4 14317= 1 D-40- 0PM Mr'l 71 3 Vnl ' 41 'l4 bW 11- 12 74 0n IM-2 -1v MUM
TN 1N1mt.9 ItDx "N.?191171 'nW4 N1n 7*? JtSi trN m-1-pri "- I0 NmW1 inn 1i1i
D'911i2p oWrm 1 7 D~I tlwr.4-12v n 0nl N linrpmi 1nm nI-vvl 1V? in3w :mW
."-Y11

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
80 ALTMANN [80]
65,11 s1 DI nt i D n '988 64
66-, ssnl n4V*i .110 11S
038# .) av voN w b93m
DIU I*,imm i~5~N1 nra6 i
Is"fitt 1#31#DWR lvrp
.0?Y
nbD"IMI-11
99 04131MT'n%*~ t~~rl1%rS
19f % Inn'0 ;I t3n
141t I0nn ? Q~wa
1%; 67 1 j ?DSnIyft9 t6 6713.1'1 -)Sbtl ?D lia , I~
DT ?YVn
t1~~l 8009 PMT= 017 ~ 01998 ' 'I'W 10830 Ilru88 937u VMS VB 1?a ' 6 #
?Ynn ;1*m71 ip5m alrutpm t3173 5',itg1 7'317j V31ym f tmk3 tP'1 t '31'l
1=a 017=11% 711n i9itil r1rut 22170 o m9 51n 1 1mm30 nnvwl tr193 Tab
njj,7 'I?? n2 -,17#11 161317 68-oi rt % 13mvil IsM rivB 41730 ?m
V903 17'.t -,J9n 69 ll rinnrb t m pr'imirr v inn Im i'i 1 m1u1 a lw 5
1,tinto1 0mrli W38 il 1I j T?2 it, IT? I 9 vo] iD 7070
trisn bw: 1-r47 mamb -nonr* vimr In ?y .nhanb mn n abb
XJ'7 3W X610.t 13"'711n t ann 73 13'1i t in? ?It 72 9)jf*)8 9 ) 9 t igg'7f% f ;1vtn?

ttDtj 'in 75 13? rnr rnith 'w i 4zDi lit t7rin ninn 7iNiz 1n1if Kimn i
KSD3 so 7s 0009, *11 0199 WNtD SW ?3 718 0 310bn i 8a 0919r 0111 10
4ri1 wtv, w69 lln? DtN n3j3 X9n 76 W'ittn OD 9 61V2S 'i 'iny%7s tf 0 D10tf

Ii=6 inN 0711H t33N 77.ttn313 'inn 89ft p'o1 t ',173D nftnS DWK tt91 1321m no
nlvni iann*i bs-m 'iDn3 viwn? in ?vi ."i'mirin 011-3 min ftm t)"V73m 'Tmv
?x W 00 Nu -iwx m"S milmn i mito-t3 nnW vmvim ixvit prisinr

i'Dwibl 16 11 X KX210 1831 12 11 1 2 ftM0Dl0 n1D? n 8 11 H-privni 1mi[pirm1l 6 6

Al ,1 'fNj 64

[ 7D nribbl vil nx119100 6,1.1i t pra ? ?nwm '1 ?3ith1lt 'iV10? 17 98'1 5s
.NSW? 013; pin *b 7m ... 1"'2-12 I-1
pim in li nvn :X"D tn'-=1 Ifti mil ,91D 9x 7 YImm ,%VV nom 17m t1r113; rm

.1 , 4 ?'P -n 67

. 1 , 1 41 69
.8 ,' n91n vo70

.* ,P K bJB D"D 72
. I ,T : 'I<DW 73
.K ,lDl A J"K 74
2t ,1 21W Day 7s
. ' ,p '0 76
. j K2 M*4 77

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[81] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 81
0 1312? 9 n D nll39 ? =10b 131CI .V'l87 n 71 137

p'rap~ima tx* imst n9n 12W1 n",Isy1 ni w 7&jtN


0131WrlII 112M2I Z31R W1In trl lVX 138 T I. N1 fX.7111WIt9ll 112"Wi 1102

13,14111VOn' l 112 1911 0t3 13Xw 79.t13n 5116 'tg 1 jIjtjw It . I D j).tt
1inNtV 13 mmit) im 7? tS'Na1 ninvirm ?Dw =bri irrm 02*1 TI 20
Y, 11ls DTTt '0III13 113n "on moln? 72 111m? " 1 mv al$ n lf il 8so."
13g1M 11173V IM tnl 111 1 7'tII $XV' :DV t 1S 03"?VD013 Dqf~j'93?1p '31
m tron -qriSnim zy 81n,* m? minny ?itntr h i nn ri 911't '$i mm IinD

rIpr it? -4n wiIIIN V1"003 $"*li a 1 1.11 Tto3 ?2 " 1' Y," 25
&fn 7m3 1-liu ninvin ?n vTrirl m? mt 7,80 N MM 1173*M1 MIPY't N3 it 13
113 D I'in' 71V9n 82 npri rrm? vit n LC D itiv InnH ru VD3 t*D
nimo 3rinvi 1 03?DV83 t3,6 t3'48 412 $NIJV4 ?nTIlt3 1112kt7DI 1.210 M I
11nn t } 1 tllD 7nl 't84t 'Onn "iom t0wir nr3 i31 pi irrirmm1 ia9
"Ib 'Nn 1XIV t "11ftilo rl8n a" IjV I9 19 V'l 7?4W -"Ti 1ja 8s:5"t 3D 30
87 DD4'I?N ') mi trin trm r"TD ;31 inn ninrn t3agniv orn s 186msm i iftl

II X M N 011323 Inl1SM 1 1 N 12,112111 = t2mmituon 0 b'@311mv 19 11 x tvzvm$1


bt 112-17311-11 11 X nl" 1W [I'N 25 11 1 4*X-[l 1"o* 24 111 a l 13ib pl [Plnmpl 23
III t DnD-'T lt n'N 31 111 "1 30 l tnN N 'N InnN 27 11 1 2 N nllbli lilibl 26

.To ,1n 3 l0K1 " 78


,US -1 ,(1589) P"Db U"BW ,N1 =1@ '1 2-TW b? l11'D ,U-213 Vtl 'V 79

P't11 0"t1 2 71r in 0n'7 : ,101~w I1" ...Ku ,Kt u N" :('T i wT11' ,T"1)1 -

7=WS Wino -W21n =M? 72 M-11-71 I3M- t0 1 MM?M 4D23 MVW-bit 7V1 N1
t3 Nm 00. N/r N im in 03 11n.9m im mw3N' oN a7 1 .trv ,rt" Ti m 85
?w lv9m ;rknn W1D9 ...rnNw" :vl ,t -O N iti iS 'T'I Jc11 m ?11w N-7 -fIn
"oip'-4 nl Imllm -loo 14-IMM 1-"1 *"Sm ir 2 Ill- m ni7pru vD ?w .1nolr 1--T,7
."n1NW1111ot nWin 1"618 ... ,n11 vIm1pD v -,773 -
.(59) 1D '0 ,a rm '-o -)nil?:) 80
.XV 1 l b1t ' I" S3 ,= ,I J1 ,M111 1273-0 ' 81
.Tn ,122 rj iVN j 82

.M " 'j'p r=1V 83

.2 ,T14 1 3tV 8s
.b ,"T t3 n 1l1 87 .U ,1* jjwjI; s8

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
82 ALTMANN [82]

Im1 .D"f' ?lr7v mnD m


X-1, 17 9 '471 lIt - 1IT l 1
lln'liv rSl"Ito1Wf ~ ill-Ir
'D ys 'wwrn SND 09103 1
n 101, MOM# MV W t~il8
91konwwy 9 -lim mmai g
ZrIDW 14 1a 13?3 1=9l ,o
mr,' N0 0#1 am 7' mir -o
r116 rbw* NIr'nliar 1 ;1nw
Inn3 1W i'?ltDwlv 9w "
nN vrTnium nizinn ommv
;l91 -s:5"T t3n,'? njn nni
3 T 11TS f~~151Ionb lith'
-1?3mv romnn =,", , t %3
ba m Nalhb 17i3 m W mry
VD20 JD 1n Inn 971P3n 1-17
p59 in rINt om gion m0
1inmmisti inn) i)rri in
DOD'CT 14 TI N1 nyn 13m
IM134 t2yv71f 3l'lD 4100 3W
Nxt n5 5Uy n9y4 1"m 01
3 N [t3NT] 39 11 2 K M laZ [,n

1 n'~iD t rt-'r l[ni, - '"ID 41-42 II 11 Ml l-i-3 [nITm-z2 41 11 ~ [nllml] 40 111


il [111pn46 II [1HKI 44 1112 I "IS ["i-X II 2 K ['12 11 43 11 1 - b tl '1V2 l ~7Vul
[i'n'l II 1K ,IN' ['11p' 49 111"nK [%HTK 48 11 M M H 'nl' [KMn'7 II 1, ;1m [m I3 11
NllMTI -1 [1 1OH1 i 51 11 nnnn, [inmnir iI m , nmori [ntMM'1n 50 iI H K r n
.11 " l y"ll

.K ,I1lTf1 ,7"t- lDv s'll 88

.37 ,I"19V ,85 'DM ,"1337 I"UM 89

.?0 3 ,i 1 I t3II 91
.2 ,n, 7l ,I . 'lnT ,T" 11 92

.V'1T ~u T 1,7 rnt 123 ' l , pK 133K1 I .13


j"1;,t',,11 9 es
VT ,CV
.671, Inn olWWVIV 96

.Ul' ,"I' :11) 97

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[83] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 83

rrr 11uonr1 iri I2 .un 31rriv I2WV im3 n3 1 f 3


Min ilin 13mn, mm1 N 5x nvn "n 5n nln Wv Rl
112 06( 1"jP&I V15DW Z351V MW 15DW t51Y2`719M W
D13-01--'0TS m3 ri r* f98 l,', lt3V 1 K5r f f fl W"' 5
99.0"Nx 1Nxntr Tn ' -lar 'r3i3 t - V w
ivr33 y fn wc riv 7-lun rrroz wi3 Nll- pri ux 5=5
,inn3z1 1.0K31tw min oryn rnDH N 19 tlgDT $N l xN
2~'t 35 f1tK3t feNt lflt' K~' fl r~ tr?m ~KtD mi
1 1-173 11?ZK 81wf "2 3 - IDi' lJVif - ?Z1 71W rw rl 'r '

i 11MONl TI ''2 3u.05 mipw'il"T.1n 9altr p 'tKI KD


-jn9n 9 1 mr,4'1 rvton -15 7-1xv rvir nxr, 31W
2 Y1734 wwoi rtnmx D N *D ritr 5 vizia ru -3on mn
-1jimm nwx tr2 2,15 43nn t rw ir -15Y v "p irwr '4
?noNa lDH O17# 09'9 *3@ 0127~ '99 19i '831' 9 4 il'93N
11#'3Dt) 1131 VlI73DIM 134=1 DIM134Y.1 5'1Xs olnS m
13Ns 11n i nnx 8 1v1* oW1 Ivn 19 134? 7 j3,-j'w3'l9
'?Irn - 4Mtn -TX?3 IV;7 h" '4Dr #34 1 19 r Nx1 9 rit tLi
Win~ O'itti 1031 0 *PSlf '3 ImmN'I NV i{189 a2a1 1 W
iDERii w1.101n vrin
Dman l.inrb-3riv ==5 0nwr 4D inioi
yini twt vi99x33
n rpiny
ni 2w-ini
rinv

00ol131vot 17 D3-gpmvIn t D a37 1270? Wt'15 13

[ri'1rrl 13 II ii"1" 0,13 -v 1 [MiMp" TM N IM Z 10 II :1 K ,"1.KN tri;lr 5 7

.H:, ,"0 1T 98

.T ,K :'I7Tn "t 1
.t' ,: :;'1 D", 2
.T3 ,~ 1"N 3
.K ,' 31'K S
.KN ,f 21W 6
.99 7

., ,,~ m1SW 8

.t ,) 21N 9

.D 12

.3 ,N~ ~D on 18-T 8a

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
84 ALTMANN [84]

fly 1 7717 V1119 1il ? Z3


13'97=1 17nN 411% DIrn1
mlvT vinN N)61 - u m DW
.xelytio imi 0 v Is l8ft
03131 IINOV Xh $3"?3
?"lnff WTI'77# 1 t-171 DI
1s.wo3 Oprin Nx otm wv1
61 2 11DX3 IOT 20.131241,
v1)*'t73 II lltl ttlnj N 22 IX
1*mp NY 01 0 t0m av D
23. 13, 20 11117 fllgg m m
11312n 1 D ot in n INt= .12

tSiw il2m w"47172 "at -in m

mNO mmDN 2a 1 v Tm
tt1Ni vait lp irm rimn 'hi
vivit -,-,I v Ifimbr ) "D
It0l0' ' kN; i 13'ittowl DW ,11

dwil- 11( wift?pil @"f


132? O3 'lTD 26 m111
[nInM= fljW 17 II K =M00
= N MOD [l 11o 1 1 M O"ml P

[n.l.lw
11i 1 '7 14II32n1
1 2m 1v 1[ri1[N-O1
N K120M0 27 II MK 3111
1 nrlll [IvllM
12 MV 26 [131
- 'W"7171 IH1 1J
N 29
lSrl [1'w'21
11 II17N3 24 11

[W"i1 36 II '1M 'M'7'1P [l"WrpiN 34 II 11 i'-oM I0 [vr"10I M'? I 11 MN )11 "l N~D 33
.M , y 027 14

.: ,SW lrp15
.*1 ,N fl12K 16

.n" , 1 "l 7210 17


. '?- " 18
.n ,U ;tD U ,t ' ,,t il'236 19
.1, ,N ,- K 0tn) 20
.t ,7 ; 2 , n =14 D"U 21
IV ,tJ 04%-l 22
., , niN 23

.n-i 'D ,m;1- i ,(Iviivw mT ovm n1-


.1Z ,tW0 Mn1;ND
?inv m4w) ;1n ;-t
,U'i 117%V l'n,ND
n ,rm4m.l"'
'iWj 25 0 24
.2 MN? 74.111"W 26

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[85] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 85

.n1'ft31w ivy nm~Yv inn n Mp1jlpv mmunit m ?? onamm


film 128.pfl f j9"r7 11 8 pu f* V27 f11 4 11
00n mri?nr
ib$(Dab bn1i3 unm
711 l iS
@SS1~t~~
17 }13~19
27 lainf51
'pni 17") no
D'pnP 13;niR t n@02yn
STf Z 03 3'rmI n) u
031YZ 134'47 ID 29.13'014114l l 5D t)4*1%1y t)-4 n?5n 1 .92)ln r .52, 215
flfl %1N) 301 NX I5t 14t7 l 10931 NX '-I K' If D 5XN1 M1 11 9f"l MII 40
flll1K l'it-nn Wl 31.3lfl' NK' ) ',1i31 tlD,71 flnT1T' KX J5 1)1 .(t1w'01'
'K 'm IDV m 1K 'b 1lj7 f214111,11? 7f 1"1fil DIr'?I4Y mm v 3 In1lm, '-I
'& rmnnn 'nDD ',rrm N nn M "',n, flzvv 1?zNxv nw3: niK 37nv 321n
8 17 II 45 Bns7 m 80 3 'vl m T' "'D .9mo .49n '"*Dt W 113nD lz5 mLm,2 D
',5 mlKin z K, 'x 1Tr' Ki f 5l 'Kj1 17T1 DWlK$ 34,J'f1l %Ty 1Ktf =11 iimN 45
i5Y', ', 5y D N1 K fl" DX!ib 113T If lK1# 'm i ?Dl t fl mvpn xZ ' fl13i
';I InOa 0I1N83 111 0138 p im? (1171 ''f 1111111 4 1901M SXP) lilli
J7 ',3 .1Kna ' 15 iT' oItI7?Z f 'ivv01f fivn 36 nt. 15M1ll2 35sftl ,Kil
'v 1inp n. n4'vvfl mi3m inn lonirinpw z'inivi~ miv l " ',i"n f riN sp
'1D 'd-111 141 VItV1,71 D P71 1- 1n1o 0 Tvaltt) 5V y 11YO 171732 "5`10 11alln 50
1=3K.1 013"211 "i"Y 101911 10-11 Di up DTiN 'fol 3115432m1 Wifo liftlta
099313 '1102 TND will "061 X51 1712 '01 N110 M"Is7Y l"Iftib6 .144 5tv
ChMTPinl anyom p3n' n 74 .111D t341 a134-11) 37 t]wfX v9it n1mi rivit 5y

[b1Kr 47 11 K 1'IT [1112T 46 11 3 ID711 [1 9VYZ1 40 11 3 N [M ' Ml 39 11 N tK' V


IM-112 53 N K1 rnnWvT llviru'-11 511 2" T'11-71T' 48 3 b K1 DK [101ZK72 II 10a1 K

.nn ,N 'Mj3 27
.X1 ,mW tr itm 28
.In ,I '0'7VZ D"D 29
*134 ,j ioltYVs 30
.NX ,tD gWWWYo' -"y 31

.1-XK '17I ,1-otyf jIK",Z ,t'JlM11-1 ?n0 '1' 213; 31N '0 32
.I ,rr ? " 0 33
.1 ,rr 1 410o1 34
.1 ,ftol l 6tYWV 36 .2' ,N 4nn as 35
ptI 0P1t#K 'i'$ 0'01 iI S7VD 1DO 1flTpfl2 3f12K jnflS '1 '92r nivr 37
KNKn110 ; t"0n n1t1K ; f1' 012'7 0K) rni,', rn1 io znu "I 4 1- lrK'17
wnzv* ,KNipm 7-t 7-o rN 0x1 omn1"-:( 0" m 1vn m NW NX-Iv UMMO Doll; M"D11
'11D "1002 ,1 n1DM "IM 011NSM b...MM ,1Dni -1.8 1-T3 TV-= 11W'8
11-10 ?NXtDr r"-limn3 31n n -i3 v ;*2 8-p m1710n 7'422 arMD a13 ,1001
711"' -IVMZ ,9"S TIDWR '17112 -16 116"11ibi tul"(417 M 11 -Y t'" ?3 ps1' 17H W
-IIN4.1 ,1172'p 71-03'7X ,NDWN 33 3N9 to 1SM ,V': "02l'Wl 'IVX 091158 0 t '4`In
-ivmDK 89 1 ,0-ID IP91 rm t1om1 ,"11' JIM 1D ,nlk'SNA 110 ,IN'tN1 M 11'
."DWm114Y nl 0vl ,041=3 tDo2 M 3311M , r"IM-2 1:)1M

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
86 ALTMANN [86]

D-l'Y ft'W4 "On '%


-j WX 39 3 8 73 38

IN 'T 91337 117* 13nn' D -at"Illit 1111 4331, 'tn "S - 1? 3 11M -
inoo". rwn, t n- ryanmalionirin ir~v -un m n ri nm u riri

mnm0 n vi iwr n21 mi iro in3 1,41m W' t prnnuzn ti n w


127 1" 2= ? 13-1118 =13 971 C 2Y NWi9 ?13 D - ?3V1-W ?n 3-l0NjjO'
k6 10291H D13"IY T 0VM 71i' l 2 INTW =? 42 W-* *1 -) WX
D'rPT11
vim rljTfl
zr l*D rvr02;r?110
rrinnmmf
`n'VPVI EN
timiill '0D 3?fifi
1unwr
13r13 )unrn
N K7
fivT'mni/
I'll; (fl7t~nl
iJnir
13-1=3 fl'-,12,
i0wn mnpiwtflBn
W1101pml tlsn41Wn 090t 3 (9 Kbit$~ 002 ] JI 'lft$ ' MD$ 09~31,$ 03801 65
n- 3Z17 tI35 n ? u l rn blW n - 'nZr 1t $ DTf W43.11 m1 n
$i1 9 6ft*DW 1 211 '71 "T' n= "OD th DB13621MN x 0 Nrrim i

N? jD"V1nV -?nll n 134?l21113 13illnun my at - s'in 4.V' 131 910 44 ?Sit


1rim miD T-3 .ftmn I= sibmin aivi ivv ei nm0' 173 rn W1i 1 rivi1lW
1173nil 1113 111D, )lm 13t "Inn K R%14nl -11=17 71 738, in -14Vt 1
46?="- VB >917 t W JIN'N -niftjn ft ul-111n t3410 -Miln t n "IO, 10 TI
.13'171"13-ill 13"TW-l i3V -ilftllftSS1001 M-11111 711N W03 11'1Vn '13H T1$3f
,1011 JVW 13173M Ditl= 711=t ID1311"M MID SX l2 -117 ?X`PVW 1? , 1 70
I61im narozn nn ixv 173 in rrion rinivri virw morm rmn xmlv mN m Ift 1 l 8 #
nim- DIU Pn X. I ' TPR IiTinbW 2 -11?3 ?nv rvi n ;*v tat Imi 993 D T
-W in J-1 3-immin-1 t alft mh IrmI in -lo in m v 1-112- inm 'it x 11i #u

-,V37 *RD9 I2 "D nl"Xl "It S IN M n-l '4= l ?$ UN XB # - 11-1#

nmm 1N0 1313f t -lVX -1 = *3 81W13 'in W 71M ;I T n 11t 1K1) ,21,3 IV
0#1 .1190 SWN;N~ MS NYt~ '1W 1190 DN '187 'lfit~ X1 Pb011308 IS N1; lyS

1 p [1p 59 11 1 INn [1 II 11 2 N P 56 11 = 0t9' ['4~6 55 11 u n71


.11 a tuWnM [VIMtm 61 II 1 r1n N in 1 1,3 A.t t" 3Kli [lln - l-% II
.11 1 [m"Mi'nIm 71 11 = nm-In [Etnr' 70 I1 K n11'n [inllin 66 II K 1n'" 1 [n1D IK 64
[1m14w9 liS 1 N K ~j1 Eolh II N '1t 7 0W,72 I 11 73 M h 1 T'W % [ V12N 3 8

.:'; ,n A~ i D"f 38
X. , t 7"~b l 39
.il ,l SDTID 40
-,1141ri bt .I= rl=% '-,M 7,1=I t ; , =,"I,1 j)-1'"41

Xt. , .n;lVI- ."~ - 44


,~ T=14M 43

.019t3110 91 918@tD 3181I$ 12r "TD 31nn ' -" ')? -l Wb -112 NM 46

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[87] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 87

019 17N DWt13 DINVI )DW3Hn =n116 Mu1l'tlrl "21371 3 '1

fl1~l30Lfl8 1 finan jrn'7 0?DK '7K flN"791 0 D7K

tYK OZMK .131 V 9 '4. Nl Mn'7 T flTWit =11M.1 ('n1f


wN -t1 -mow 1 015V .1M'R 022 52 9N 1 rm-1 nii '- nRD3f

l'?Z in = K'70 10 0 i' ?Z1 K'a K':'3 01R' N 4 7' K


13bt 32MRN
'rfl JR1 48.0013
52 :.7"?n ti 71n rian
=5'Knvt 51T 21V5
',IS7?' 1 nrii ~1.
r om11 vi01t
l*TD3 5R
r"Dpi 9"N 5 NR m 7u 3 -ivv PID5 13; ru 1 .pmo-y. .10'w

K'141S '? '3T 0i1K ' '3 so K'17 t18 -I1 49,iy,- ,rvZK p 9r
D'3'30 j30 7'NT 13'3'13 ;rD 173T' j3t:WNH 030 108 1
K'W1 O 31YK .2'1D p f1'N i D"N3m 11 .Dr 1 v) tv
mm ionY 11 K' NR 1 .r=R2n mrnl 1tN 0inn irm nisit

01=31317 =11.1 MR1" 2 22 1711 Do D" 1a trr1it *iaC 7-it11


T"DY h '13 :" 'D=0 '13-12 n MM "D01 MI~ 1m103'
Wi N 13)3DI "IM 13 MRM D13V M111 "D000Y 1'31V *1'=3
E31 R11" 1115 1 -'jan Z3" nj 211DW INn D"Y3Vt 11111 VTS
.03103 Pt~N1~ 0Nln51 800Nl'DB 031 8937 PIK'lfX'WtN O13

NL) ON 19#1 .1p'CC' 0132 199 T 81~j nl130~ n1bin 1Sx71


7"39 M;SN1 $NW~I 3939 PD 'L3'Nt3 Di '3 DNDDt 0198 1
Nl1r 0$)101 'Xb TM ;1 .fr"ftSWil~ln "3 pC'Wn~ p000 00@
tDX N1W1 so 13738 'CS tl")t~~li~~ St37 10 "P9SW irll St11$33'CB tDW 0380 30

tnt=1 [ lfn11n 1M n1 25 11 H K 1lDD [p110D '7 16 1112 - N [r' 71 10 11 12 nM 117


II1 ~n1r 1'n [nl ~n13t 27 11 a =N m t'' 1 [i D'i'ni '1 1 K1 ii N 12' ['113 26 11 2 1 N )11l
"'Dt m ;1 m1nmi "Dt [ ii, "D II i tw112 [I 'rz 29 112 1 i [n'l IN 28
vi '77 K '7173 ? '7N '' KDV1) -l13 '-i TNrl iiillK2 -ni rw1'CO : , m1
2 N K1i T-7"~nZ; v 1132 [.' 1 Fv" 311Z 30 11 2 ~ r1 1 rln-1 [11n 30 111 M 11~i 'Srn

. f' ,U" D"Sii 150

. .1 ,Kt' 2' in 53
." ,'' P9t1 so

.H ,1 7T ,N (iz~ ,S.-38 O'9W1' ,T=llpn1=1 01"" '0 sz


.;100P nnr1Dbi 2 lb 'D "1 s3

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
88 ALTMANN [88]

V"" r,'l l nntX 1 l 1

.10,111 owa -1xlv-,17 ?Di rim

In x1 Dart vl7prr m ?vwp a on it o lln ilnso'n ,q "w-r 1 D , a~91m ;pm


rnrnl.n Ion Dx nn1 aNmnnn- m rmn? iv In an L: nb np .17un at 35
JOI" r8l mo~oDm 13Tlin i i1 'Im jNr otP D'9ni : S in pn -i3 ln'l l 45
nmm n' [1100 on'o n 3nil'a xin',"01 n Vn= 3 $ nmnl [ p-;n 33 ?I
MR NXj ]11' M wPip 4D 11n01?2VJ 3? W1 s 55 s 'tn'i l r? wh '71nyllT)Yl Mr
n18nn1 NYSbttl ILBR~f Zflft 'TSW t '319 # 15n5199 93 5ft 0018 D 8018
910 -1213ynA m1173WI -, so X 56 jij-)? tft2-, n V DW0 3 tl131M 172 NofOW! 40
*#Iv' Now "DEN m1m81 NIm"7 3"t0 X01# 7 111mHm oft 21-.11 710
t373 1W lxDm In mhiv? i1v? 1 mr mt xxD t N M "IDX 'IDN t)31%41 s 57 Xl-
Nlrllr mr, sml Ov em tr N rIm' 'l -N rut 1-913-, '"D ?v 1 m1i ?Xftlrv
.l3-lX4Ml 113 lb?(TS-t tDVb LDB1 -OIDD ?X 1 t ')ItVlIY' I " *lv I= at7 f
yS?lvl 58. 11ritr x-Ilama 122D llb?'01 ITTROlM 13'111nROIIV M?0' m1r0f } 1TNT 45
.,*o 091Y #11t3: i x n ?x tow m7vm .tlr N In nwit

ma nmi ImNrlD - ',InN38-37 I l 1 8 1899#0 37 11 hmv10l? - rinnW11 33-32 11


Ni) 1 II 1 3'*XN [1DW17f 43 1112 X " 8TS" 0317 39 11 1 Wn",-l r'?L 1.772 1'1 ] lx
II nN t 1210 ?31 11 tt II ND1" j Ol E'7'1 11 1 2 lnNmltv? lliirmv'?V? 45 11 81 x"Ip
.I N lib01 11 [ 1371Y - 0l3111 46

."... Drrbln
fnNWWl "l# '0 .1n10 01201 .1TpnS,?,,.Z
u1 Is rN ?nr,
~ 20 lK ,inl
,l*3 'DD r)T' Nr 01V1
tt "ll' -
n11'*oD

. ,D t lt'r 8I 'o 5o
.217-203,(1958) tD ,rZltn ,"NU~MnV D"NK HW'D" ,Zl 7p'T .,. ;N ,.T4 7l-)"5o s7
.1 ,IT= I"VIVII 58

This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen