Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
American Academy for Jewish Research is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT:
A THEOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY
WITHIN THE AMSTERDAM RABBINATE
IN THE THIRTIES OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY*
By ALEXANDER ALTMANN
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
2 ALTMANN [2]
another colleague, M
in manuscript, a Trata
one may assume that
da Costa's denial of i
Samuel da Silva's refutation of da Costa in his Tratado da Immor-
talidade (1623).8 In 1633 da Costa had been placed under herem
for the second time and the fresh publicity thereby given to the
apostate's views during the last phase of his life - his suicide
occurred in 1640 - may have aroused a sense of obligation on
the rabbis' part to fortify the community's belief in the traditional
tenets of immortality and resurrection.
Isaac Aboab's Nishmat IHayyim, though composed, as we shall
see, in that very period, is the document of a controversy which
had caused a rift within the Amsterdam rabbinate itself. Those
primarily involved in the dispute were Aboab and Morteira; bu
far from being a purely theological issue, the question at stak
had created a great deal of ferment in the community. As our
analysis will show, the conflict embraced two distinct, though
closely related, levels, one theological and the other pragmatic
and the arguments advanced on the pragmatic level were clearl
inspired by Marrano sentiment. The position taken by Aboab an
the faction led by him reflected a basic concern to assert the in
alienable Jewishness of all Marranos. Aboab himself was a former
Marrano, born a Catholic in Castro d'Aire, Portugal. After a shor
stay in Saint-Jean de Luz in the southwest of France, his parent
had brought him, at the age of seven, to Amsterdam, where he
had studied with Haham Isaac 'Uzi'el of Fez and had become
Haham of the congregation Beth Israel at the age of twenty-one
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[31 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 3
Another Marrano, Abraham Herrera, a discipl
had tutored him in Kabbala.9 The mystical th
had adopted supplied the intellectual armor -
with which he defended his viewpoint. Saul Lev
other hand, was of Ashkenazi descent.10 Born i
year 1596, he seems to have studied with Leon
in a responsum,11 referred to him as "one de
bhen yakir ii). The fact that Morteira's name d
da Modena's list of disciples "reared and broug
can be explained by his departure from Venice
of twenty before he had matured as a scholar
Aboab, the ardent devotee of Kabbala, Mortei
caught his teacher's distrust of the mystical tr
ist of no mean quality, he showed also some i
Hebrew philosophical literature.13 It could hav
of surprise to the Amsterdam community to
Morteira on opposite sides of the fence in the
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
4 ALTMAN N [4]
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[5] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 5
Family, though making distinct reference on
tioned also the controversy and the support g
the two Venetian rabbis.16 Strangely enough, he
No. 32 from which his information derived. P
had no access to Pettigrew's catalog and receiv
at second hand from someone who did not bother to be accurate.
him as a*S kI,, the superlinear dots indicating that the three
letters form an acrostic to be read: nwtv~z 'i ,i . Pettigrew
had obviously been at a loss to identify the reference to Morteira,
the only one found in the entire source material at our disposal.
Thanks to this item of information, LiSwenstein was able to state
that the dispute was one between Aboab and Morteira. Nothing
beyond this bare report has ever been published about the con-
flict.17
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
6 ALTMANN [6]
The documents testif
following texts, wh
notated edition:
Text A (Ryl. Hebrew MS. 5, fols. lr-4v), a Letter - Pettigrew's
"dissertation" - addressed to an unspecified rabbinic court, which
gives a dramatic account of events at the early stage of the dispute
and makes a strong plea for support of the traditional doctrine
of eternal punishment for certain grave offences. It cites an im-
pressive array of authorities who upheld this doctrine in the past,
and it implores the Beth Din to declare the contrary view an out-
right heresy (kefird). The document is undated and unsigned. The
missing information can be easily inferred, however, from Text B,
which leaves no doubt that Text A was written prior to January,
1636; that Haham Saul Levi Morteira was its author; and that
his plea was directed to the Beth Din of Venice.
Text B (Ryl. Hebrew MS. 5, fols. 5r-6r), a Letter written in
Venice during the week of Parashat Shemot in the year 5396,
which corresponds to one of the first few weeks in 1636. It is
signed by two well-known Venetian rabbis, viz. Shema'ya -ben
Moshe di Medina, grandson of the famous Samuel di Medina
(MahaRaSHDaM),18 and 'Azarya ben Ephraim Figo, author of
the homiletical work Bind La-'Ittim.19 The Letter sought to per-
time at the British Museum tracing and completing these references; and I
am now ready for the work of editing." Regrettably, it was a case of love's
labor's lost.
18 A native of Salonica, Shema'ya di Medina was one of the rabbis of
Venice, whose name appears under many decisions of the yeshibha kelalit.
He wrote a commentary on Proverbs (unpublished) and edited his grand-
father's sermons (Sefer Ben Shemu'el) with an introduction of his own, which
contains many autobiographical references. See Mordecai Samuel Ghirondi
and Hanan'el Neppi, Toledot Gedoley Yisra'el U-Ge'oney Italia - Zekher
Saddikc Li-Bherakha (Trieste, 1853), pp. 352, 323, 358; Shelomo Simonsohn,
op. cit., p. 48 (Introduction).
19 "Azarya Figo (Pigo; Pichio), born in 1589, was a disciple of Leone da
Modena's (1571-1648), whose list of favorite students he heads (see Blau,
op. cit., p. 168). A responsum addressed to him by his teacher vividly illus-
trates their happy relationship (see Blau, loc. cit., No. 87, pp. 85-87). Figo
published a commentary to the Sefer Ha-Terumot of Samuel ben Isaac Ha-
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[7] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 7
Sardi under the title Gidduley Terumd (Venice, 1643). His Bind La-'lttim fol-
lowed in 1648. See Abba Apfelbaum, Rabbi "Azarya Figo (Drohobitsch, 5667/
1907); Israel Bettan, "The Sermons of Azariah Figo," HUCA, VII (1930),
pp. 457-495; Simonsohn, op. cit., p. 56 (Introduction).
20 For the date of Figo's death see Blau, op. cit., p. 85; the date of Shema'ya
di Medina is given as Siwan 13th (June 3rd), 1648 by Steinschneider, Cat.
Bodl., No. 7117, p. 2516 f.
21 I am greatly obliged to Miss Erla Broekema, Librarian of the Seminary
Ets Haim in Amsterdam, for informing me of the existence of the additional
two MSS. of Aboab's treatise and for putting microfilms at my disposal.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
8 ALTMANN [8]
in the same hand. C3
It was copied by Davi
C1 excels in beauty o
bly illuminated. It sh
borne aloft by cheru
side). They depict, over
lowing events: David d
David; Elijah bringing
Solomon's judgment.
four crowns are inscr
and shemr tobh. The fi
within a garland, abov
scription: 'Ateret tif'e
C2, though less ornam
page shows beneath t
placed in an aureole o
trumpets, with sheets
King David playing th
by two female figure
under an arched roof
title in the center form
title page of C3 has a
MSS. It is decorated w
initial sentence on pag
by flowers.
The fact that according to C1 and C2 the treatise was composed
in the year 1648 is rather puzzling. Aboab could not have com-
posed it in Amsterdam in that year because he left Holland for
Brazil in 1642 and did not return until 1654. He had accepted an
invitation to become the rabbi of the prosperous Jewish community
of Recife, Brazil, which was under Dutch rule at the time, and
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[9] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 9
had thus become the first American rabbi. When Portuguese reb
bands started a war of liberation in 1645, he remained with
flock and endured the terrible hardships of the siege of Recif
1646. While many Calvinist preachers returned to Holland, he
not leave until after the final conquest of the city by the Portugu
troops in 1654, when all Jews were forced to emigrate. His e
poem Zekher 'asiti le-nifle'ot El is considered by the histor
an important document of the events of that time.24 The ter
through which he and his congregants had passed are also referr
to in the preface to his Hebrew version of Herrera's Puerta
Cielo (Sha'ar ha-Shamayim, Amsterdam, 1655). There he rend
thanks to God who had brought him out of the kur ha-brazil
Brazilian furnace).25 As recorded in the minute book of the Unit
Congregation Talmud Torah in Amsterdam on Elul 29th, 54
September 1654,26 Aboab was reinstated as Haham, a capacity
which he served until his death at the age of eighty-nine in 1693
Since there is incontestible evidence that he stayed in Brazil from
1642 until 1654, the title page of C1 has to be understood in
following
Aboab sense: Sefer
in Amsterdam Nishmat
(i.e. while still inH.ayyim composed
Amsterdam). by Rabbi Isaac
The indication
of the year 5408 (1648) in the next line refers to the year in which
de Cordova copied the text. As we have noted above, Texts A and
B were copied about the same time. It is not clear what prompted
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
10 ALTMANN [10]
the copying of the docu
time when Aboab was n
Since the year 1642, in w
represents the terminus a
we still have to settle t
ginated. In our view th
thereabouts. Evidence t
criteria as a degree of em
to score points in an on
arguments brought for
Aboab's angry rebuttal o
ponent, he was a mere y
on the assumption that it
when Aboab was still c
in 1635-36. He was then
forty. A few years later
sidered quite irrelevant,
retort29 would have been
ful impetuosity. Hence
documents of the cont
1635-36.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[11 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 11
have a portion in 'olam ha-ba"' (Sanh. 11:1) w
about as a slogan in complete disregard of the qual
had been applied to it in the Mishna itself and
rabbinic sources. In the words of the thesis (ha
Morteira's avowed purpose to refute: "Whosoe
the name Israelite will not suffer eternal punishm
he may have committed the gravest possible s
Kabbalists, Morteira pointed out, who were re
spreading of this false doctrine of salvation f
more specifically characterized those propoundi
logy as "maskilim who claimed to be proficient
Kabbala,"32 and he called the new heresy "a roc
stone of stumbling33 dressed up as Kabbala."34 To
rabbinic sources were the only "trustworthy Kabb
between him and the partisans of uncondition
Jewish souls is portrayed in the following acco
experience:36 In the course of a sermon37 he h
sage in Rosh Ha-Shand 17a which affirms the eter
ment
rosim,in hell
etc. Hefor
hadsuch
addedgrave
a hostoffenders as minim, supporting
of other quotations informers, api.oro-
this doctrine. The result was an outburst of indignation. Among
the congregants "were some of those young men who were deficient
(bilti shelemim) in this belief, and their party lodged such vigorous
complaint against me that in my anguish I was compelled to admit
as controversial a perfect doctrine of our faith which we received
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
12 ALTMANN [12]
from our Fathers, the
and which, permitting
authorities." The rebel
pronounced as normati
controversy. Another
believing in the eternal
religion of the Christi
and that, on this accou
atonement for it by hi
ing support to the Chris
of the young radicals t
of the communal leaders
ding me to give further
commit grave sins and
punishment."39 It was w
leaders with the seriousn
of the group formulat
(p. 11). Morteira's repo
they would hardly find a
formulated the followin
to believe that the wicke
to eternal punishment
that a refusal to believe
demned as heresy, and
to their position so long
As Text B reveals, it w
was to settle the issue,
was intended to elicit
eternalist doctrine.
It will have been noted that Isaac Aboab's name is not men-
tioned in Morteira's Letter to the Venice authorities. The villains
of the piece are the radical students referred to by him as "im-
mature disciples" (talmidim she-lo' shimeshu kol zorekam). To il-
38 Text A, lines 202-204.
39 Lines 204-206.
40 Lines 207-210.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[13] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 13
lustrate their immaturity and the excesses of
capable Morteira cites the case of one who publ
he wished his soul were the soul of Jeroboam son of Nebhat
which had been said to be sure of a portion in the world-t
come.41 Aboab was not altogether free from blame for statements
of this kind since the young man in question may have heard him
say that according to a kabbalistic view the soul of Jeroboam
was to be reincarnated in Mashiah ben Yosef. Aboab's Nishma
IHayyim quotes this opinion approvingly.42 It was, therefore, par-
donable if his enthusiastic disciple entertained messianic aspira
tions. The master was obviously unable to curb the zeal of hi
students but he himself seems to have kept in the background
at least at the initial stage of the conflict. Otherwise the two
Venetian rabbis could not have expressed even feigned surpri
when, somewhat later, he publicly championed the cause of th
anti-eternalists.43 As their Letter indicates, the rift caused by the
controversy made it imperative to the community leaders to su
mit the case to the Venice Beth Din. Both parties entered the
respective pleas supported by elaborate arguments.44 Text A u
doubtedly represents the plea submitted by Morteira. We do n
possess the plea of the other party, unless we consider Aboab
Nishmat Iiayyim to be it. This is most unlikely, however, for t
following reasons. First, it neither addresses itself to any Beth Din
nor
or a does
plea. it ask for
Second, its alength
verdict. It constitutes
is that a pesa.,polemical
of a full-fledged not a she'eld
treatise. Third, it is so replete with personal references to him-
self - mentioning as it does his youthful age, his teacher Herrera,
his attachment to Lurianic Kabbala -that the two Venetian rabbis,
in their letter to him, could not have pretended to have been
ignorant of his role in the conflict. We must therefore assume that
the plea submitted by the radical group was a document now lost,
in the drafting of which Aboab was involved but which was dif-
41 Lines 198-200.
42 Text C, #3, lines 69-72.
43 Text B, lines 46-49.
44 Text B, lines 24-27.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
14 ALTMANN [14]
ferent in many respects
afterwards, though not
As Text B informs us, t
ments of the case not direct to the Beth Din of Venice but to the
old and venerable Abraham Aboab, one of the most highly res-
pected members of the Venetian community,45 requesting him to
transmit the papers to the Court. Before acting upon this request
Abraham Aboab took counsel, however, with rabbis Shema'ya
di Medina and 'Azarya Figo and they strongly advised against
placing a matter of this kind before the Beth Din. The issuance
of a pesak, they argued, might be misinterpreted by the rank and
file as evidence of some doubt in the matter, and this could have
a morally damaging effect. Moreover, the Beth Din was sure to
confirm Molteira's opinion. As a result, his opponent (whose
identity was undoubtedly known to them) would find himself in
an embarrassing position, and the strife would only become more
heated. It was the delicacy of the situation, involving as it did
two members of the Amsterdam Beth Din, which made it appear
preferable to withhold the case from the Venice authorities. At di
Medina's and Figo's suggestion Abraham Aboab returned the
documents to Amsterdam, pleading at the same time with the
community leaders to restore the peace by prevailing upon Isaac
Aboab to renounce his view in public and by his example to cause
the rest.of the dissenters to follow suit. It was the failure of this
strategy which prompted the two rabbis to write direct to Aboab.
Their Letter (Text B) is a paradigm of ecclesiastic diplomacy.
It opens with some flattering remarks about Aboab's high reputa-
tion as a Talmudist and thinker, which had awakened in them a
desire to enjoy his friendship. God had willed to present him with
an opportunity for evincing his full moral stature in public and
45 Lines 28-45. Abraham Aboab had founded the Synagogue "Keter Tora"
in Hamburg before moving to Venice, where he died in 1642. His eulogy by
Figo is contained in Bind La-'lttim (No. 77). See L6wenstein, op. cit., 674;
Apfelbaum, op. cit., passim. Abraham Aboab's eldest son Samuel (1610-1694)
was first rabbi in Verona. He became rabbi in Venice in 1650 and was the
author of the Responsa Debhar Shemu'el (Venice, 1702).
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[15] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 15
thereby enhancing the glory of God, which they w
he desired. Some time ago the aged Abraham Ab
them to the controversy that had arisen in Amster
pleas that were to be submitted to the Venice B
telling the story of the consultation and the advice
the Letter continues:46 "We were hoping for the
bring the message of peace... but our expectation
trated. For we were again informed that the conf
that the spokesman of those denying the belief i
of punishment is none other than you, Sir (hu' nihu
you preach thus openly and publicly." The two
to say that they were not a little aggrieved to lea
whom they wished to honor and whose reputat
hate to see tarnished in the least was in support of
to traditional doctrine. Their only consolation lay
that it would have been far worse had the group
irresponsible, self-willed person. The fact that it
a godfearing man gave grounds for hope since he co
to live up to what was said in Proverbs 12:15: "H
hearkeneth unto counsel." The rest of the Lette
appeal imploring Aboab to abandon a view whic
to the principles of the Talmud, and to refrain,
preaching and publicizing it. What he ought to do w
at a public gathering that he had now seen the
firmly convinced that certain grave transgressions w
to be punished eternally. He would know best ho
declaration and how to warn the group (ha-kat ha
ventuiing rash opinions on subjects of this kind. It
appropriate to issue such warning to "those of
came from those places," i.e. Marranos, who "sh
one thing, namely the way how to serve God in
temimut) and how to fulfil the miswot accordin
all their minutiae."47
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
16 ALTMANN [16]
lation. Aboab's
(teshubhd) to theNishmat
question H.ayyim presents "Is
(sha'al ha-sho'el):48 itself as eternal
there a responsum
punishment of souls or not? And what did our rabbis, of blessed
memory, intend by saing, The following have no share in the
world-to-come ?" The answer opens with the ringing statement:49
"Truly speaking, matters of this kind have been entrusted only to
the Kabbalists, illumined as they are by the light of truth." There
follows a frontal attack upon the adepts of philosophy, who "lean
upon a broken reed" and are unqualified to interpret the profound
utterances of the rabbis. By asserting the role of Kabbala as the
only competent authority for the interpretation of rabbinic dicta
Aboab clearly opposed Morteira's initial statement that the Tal-
mudic tradition as such was the only "trustworthy Kabbala."
Aboab's rejection of the philosophers' exegesis of rabbinic escha-
tology is likewise directed against Morteira who had quoted
Maimonides and Albo. According to Aboab, "we have no dealings
with Maimonides as far as this subject is concerned, for he dis-
cussed it from the aspect of philosophical inquiry, and not from
the aspect of Kabbala."50 "Neither do we turn to the words of
the philosopher R. Joseph Albo, for he has nothing to say (al-bo)
in matters of kabbalistic science."51 There is a note of bitterness
in Aboab's complaint that his adversaries mocked at his zealous
running after teachers of Kabbala: He did indeed belong to what
his denigrators called kat ha-shotim (the party of fools) but the
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[17] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 17
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
18 ALTMANN [18]
expulsion,55 and it h
seventeenth century.5
presented here that i
behind the discussion
teira condemned the
eternalists as one like
"impure land" and to
fear concerning the ult
Moreover, he asserted
spread to would-be-emi
where. Finally, what w
for martyrdom if salv
alike?57 The two Ven
effect which the new
ranos.58 Aboab's repl
The doctrine of ultim
promise a bed of rose
of God. It merely asser
of its sins in what mig
entailing much suffer
Marranos would be sw
consequences of sin and
for the sake of mate
this answer is the re
least, virtual Jews.60
55 See Hjayyim Hillel Be
26 (1961), pp. 34-43; B. N
XIVth to the Early XVIth
(New York, 1966).
56 See Yosef Hayim Yerus
Cardoso: A Study in Seven
(New York & London, 19
57 Text A, lines 190-199;
58 Text B, 59 Text
lines C, #8,
71-74.
60 This mystically inspire
view (op. cit., p. 39 f.) th
Christian was a potential
could transform 61 Text
into C
an ac
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[19] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 19
62 Sanhedrin 44a; see Jacob Katz, Yisrael af 'al pi she-bata', in: Tarbiz, 27
(1958), pp. 203-217.
63 Text C, #6, 19-21.
64 See Gebhardt, op. cit., pp. 124 f.
65 Gebhardt, op. cit., 259 sq.
66 P. l f.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
20 ALTMANN [20]
Christianity. This line of
typical of Marranos. What
was the mystical concep
Jewish souls and the conco
in integrum (which will b
'There was, at the same
troversy. The protest ag
eternal punishment is indi
gaining ground under the
to 1638, in the very perio
Dutch translations of So
probably in Amsterdam,
Socinianism in its native
of the movement.67 Thoug
of the trinitarian dogma
Collegiants, represented
rigorous Calvinist dogma
doctrine of eternal dam
these dissident groups s
solatory rather than terri
a crypto-Socinian,69 wro
of punishment on the gro
of God.70 This work wa
of thinking could have
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[21] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 21
.Ialila) whenwith
reconcilable rejecting
belief inthe doctrine
a just of eternal
and merciful God.75punishment
Notwith- as ir-
standing his dislike of philosophical arguments, he made ample
use of Albo's treatment of the theme:76 Isaiah (66:24) and Daniel
(12:2) "did not mean to say that the punishment was eternal -
'Far be it from God, that He should do wickedness; and from
the Almighty, that He should commit iniquity' (Job 34:10) - to
punish man, who is 'dust from the earth' (Gen. 2:7) and 'a wind
that passeth away, and cometh not again' (Ps. 78:39), with an
eternal punishment, while sin derives from his material part, which
is corruptible and non-eternal. Thus David said, 'Also unto Thee,
O Lord, belongeth mercy; for Thou renderest to every man ac-
71 For a discussion of this controversy see Henry E. Allion, Lessing and
the Enlightenment (Ann Arbor, 1966), pp. 86-93.
72 In his Defensio Fidei Catholicae de Satisfactione Christi adversus Faustum
Socinum Senensem (Leiden, 1617).
73 See Cecil Roth, A Life of Menasseh Ben Israel, pp. 146-148 et passim.
74 Text C, :7, lines 46-48.
75 #2, 51; #3, 145; #5, 28. God's mercy: #3, 65-66; #5, 53-54; 65-
66; 46, 36-38.
76 # 5, 24-34.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
22 ALTMANN [22]
cording to his work' (P
formed by him who is
mere creature, against
adversely affected by t
substantiated his own v
sentence:77 "All this is
ment (ke-fi mishpat ha-g
were afraid lest, apart f
Marranos, the lenient n
sion among the non-Jews
should the Gentiles say
good fortune, the right
nothing will be withhold
(Gen. 11:6); for the fea
hears here an echo of t
in the regnant Dutch C
new liberal trends.
As a mystic and adept of the new Kabbala of Safed, Aboab
could afford to be more liberal than the strict Talmudists and phi-
losophizing rabbis. We meet a similar phenomenon in the seven-
teenth century Christian mystics of England and Germany who
followed in the footsteps of Jacob Boehme. It was these mystics
who ushered in a new eschatology by reviving the anathematized
doctrine of apokatastasis pantin, which goes back to Origen and
proclaims the restoration of all things to their pristine harmony
in God. They did so in open opposition to the orthodox theology
of eternal damnation.79 Aboab's treatise Nishmat IHayyim repre-
sents a seventeenth century Jewish attempt to break the spell
of the traditional eschatology of hell by publicly embracing the
Lurianic
tasis) doctrine
through of tik.un (theofHebrew
the transmigration souls. Inequivalent
so doing hefor apokatas-
rein-
forced a trend which had been in evidence ever since the notion
77 # 8, 44.
78 Text A, lines 221-223.
79 See Ernst Benz, "Der Mensch und die Sympathie aller Dinge am Ende
der Zeiten," Eranos-Jahrbuch, XXIV (1955), p. 157 ff.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[23] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 23
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
24 ALTMANN [24]
82 "Punished" (nidonin)
"Some Aspects of After L
Wolfson Jubilee Volume, E
note 57 (quoting his artic
83 Commentary on the M
Teshubha 8:1; 8:5. Maimon
Adam, Sha'ar Ha-Gemul (s
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[25] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 25
u-le-'olemey 'olamim. At the same time eternal punishm
with both karet and exclusion from the world-to-com
was able to cite in support of his view even Nahman
"a great Kabbalist and hasid" (line 62). Although h
from Nahmanides' Sha'ar Ha-Gemul (lines 51-57) is
functory, he was unquestionably right in claiming h
Notwithstanding the fact that Nahmanides gave a
allegoristic, interpretation to the Talmudic passag
of those serving a twelve months term in hell,85 he le
ness of eternal punishment for the gravest categor
(ha-resha'im ha-gemurim ha-hamurim) unchanged. He
concept of unlimited sufferings in hell with that o
introduced a graded system of this form of retribu
is briefly mentioned by Morteira (lines 52-55; 57-
"great Kabbalist" quoted with obvious relish is Balh
who used the more philosophical term eonesh nibzi
coupled with the Talmudic phrase le-dorey dorot (l
Having established, to his own satisfaction, the authe
ing of the Talmudic phrase as denoting eternality
concilable with the new-fangled interpretation of it
a "limited time" (zeman mugbal), Morteira proceeded
the Talmudic passage containing that phrase had b
by Asher ben Yehiel in a systematized form arranging
grades of sinners under six heads; that Isaac Al-Fasi
it in its original form; and that Rabbenu Nissim had c
ruling, adding, however, Zerahya Ha-Levi's proviso tha
(teshubha) canceled the eternality of punishment. Reca
Karo's codificatory rule that a joint verdict by the thr
authorities, viz. Al-Fasi, Maimonides and Asher ben
be accepted as halakha, Morteira asserted the unassa
of the doctrine (lines 86-90). Strangely enough, he
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
26 ALTMANN [26]
it had been recognized
Ha-Kodesh (completed in
had used the doctrine of
repentence had failed to
ner, God provided a chan
of transmigration (hese
tions was limited to thr
pared to admit the theor
Isaac Abrabanel had fou
"If in the end (i.e. after t
wicked will be finally cu
95-96). The text does n
quoted was added on by
rectly reported.88 In a
teach in public only wh
nounced. It was a "crimi
traditionally received w
ment "All Israelites have a share in the world-to-come" could not
be regarded as an unconditional "absolute verdict" (ke-gezera
muhletet). The term "Israelite" was synonymous with "righteous"
?(addit), as Isaac 'Arima had declared (lines 99-103). Joseph Albo
had, moreover, distinctly upheld the notion of eternal punishment
in the case of those who denied the (Divinity of the) Tora and
the principles (ha-'ikkarim) of the Faith (lines 103-106).89
One should not be misled, Morteira pointed out, by what seemed
to be a dissenting view on the part of Isaac Abrabanel in his
Commentary on the Tora (parashat shelah lekha), where he spoke
of various degrees of the punishment of karet in opposition to the
views held by Nahmanides and others and declared that in the end
the soul would receive the bliss of the next world. According to
Morteira, Abrabanel was dealing here exclusively with the special
punishment of karet,90 and not with the retribution meted out to
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[271 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 27
the grave sinners listed in the rabbinic sources
demned to stay in hell eternally. Morteira took
show that in other works of his Abrabanel recognize
that certain offences entailed the loss of 'olam h
the passage from the end of Rosh Amand which
phrase le-dorey dorot in Rosh Ha-Shand 17a as pro
trine, thus implicitly identifying eternal hell with
of a share in the world-to-come (lines 103-129). H
any possible misconception of Abrabanel's position
with a sense of relief and, no doubt, special satisfact
traditional view held by his opponent's famous
Aboab I, in his Menorat Ha-Ma'or, and he thre
measure, an equally orthodox expression of opini
Jonah Gerondi in his Sha'arey Teshubha (lines 12
Kabbalist, Menahem Recanati, was added to the li
not realize that the passages which he quoted fr
Commentary on the Tora as well as the text cited by
Sefer Ma'amar Ha-Sekhel91l (lines 147-160) were in
from Nahmanides. He brought his marshaling of
kabbalistic sources to an impressive climax by ad
sages from the Midrash Ha-Ne'elam and one from th
he had found in Elijah de Vidas' Re'shit Hokhma
These passages reflect the graphic descriptions of
partments of hell in old midrashic material whi
earliest Christian and Islamic texts on the sub
exercized a great deal of fascination on the relig
of Jews and non-Jews alike. The passage from Midra
on Ruth quoted by de Vidas and rperoduced by M
those sinners who are listed in Rosh Ha-Shand 17a
cend into hell and never rise up again, while of a
it is said, "He bringeth down to She'ol and bringe
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
28 ALTMANN [28]
2:6). The term She'ol des
hell. Of those condemne
called ere?
thither nevertah.tit, the(ha-yored
rises again" strikingsham
phrase is eyno
shubh used:eoleh),
"He whowhichdescends
sounds like Dante's "All hope abandon, ye who enter here" (Divine
Comedy, Inferno, 3:9). In proudly reviewing his array of authori-
tative sources Morteira felt that he had put up an invincible case.
The method by which Aboab's Nishmat IHayyim (Text C) sought
to demolish the solid arguments presented by his adversary may
be characterized by the dialectical pattern of "Yes, but." It would
have been futile to make a frontal attack upon what, unques-
tionably, was the established doctrine. He, therefore, frankly ad-
mitted that the overt meaning of the texts quoted was in favor
of the eternalist position. He denied, however, that this was the
end of the story. As a Kabbalist, he claimed to know certain
truths of an esoteric nature which put an entirely new and dif-
ferent complexion on things. If those truths had been withheld
from the uninitiated in the past, this was perfectly understandable,
but it was now imperative to disabuse people's minds of concepts
of God which were contrary to his justice and mercy. To under-
stand the texts literally was to ignore their inner soul which only
Kabbala revealed.93 Divulging the full esoteric truth in these mat-
ters did not imply any departure from the classical rabbinic texts.
It only meant casting light on their hidden meaning. For the
words of the rabbis (razal), the Zohar, and the Kabbalists stemmed
from one and the same source (4 3, 49-50). Our synopsis will
show how Aboab applied this principle in detail.
At the very commencement of his discussion Aboab stated his
fundamental belief that "all souls will be refined and purified in
the end of days," a belief founded, as he put it, on the kabbalistic
understanding of the rabbinic haggadot (# 1, 18-21). From the
vantage point of this firm conviction he could afford to make
a direct attack on Maimonides' (and, as he mistakenly assumed,
93 See Text C, #3, lines 6-7; 50-53 (previous esotericism); #8, lines 35-
37 (need for divulging the truth).
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[29] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 29
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
30 ALTMANN [30]
had stated the eternalist
not unduly perturbed b
although his words may
ment meted out to the p
is eternal
variably (niS.F),
adopted the this is not the
phraseology view
of our he actually
rabbis, of blessedheld. For he in-
memory,
from which one may infer that punishment is eternal, as they said
in the tractate Rosh Ha-Shand (17a), 'and they are punished there
le-dorey dorot'. Yet God forbid that they (sc. the rabbis) should
have assigned to the soul a punishment whereby she will not
'return to her Father's house as in her youth'. The term le-dorey
dorot denotes a limited time (zeman mugbal), which may be shorter
or longer according to the severity of the sin committed, as I am
going to show with God's help" (# 2, 48-53). The rabbinic phrase
could not possibly mean anything else, Aboab explained, because
of God's mercy by which "He devised means that one that is
banished be not an outcast from Him" (2 Sam. 14:14). The words
of the woman of Tekoa recorded in this verse had become the
favorite proof-text of the Kabbalists for the doctrine of trans-
migration (gilgul; eibbur). They were understood to mean that
through reincarnation God gave sinners and imperfect men a
chance of purification. If Nahmanides' discussion of reward and
punishment in his Sha'ar Ha-Gemul was silent on this aspect of
human destiny, it was due to the fact that in this (exoteric) con-
text he did not wish to touch on the subject of metempsychosis.98
As to Nahmanides' adherence to the view that transmigration was
a means
be of the
no doubt, soul's
Aboab restoration
suggested. For to
weintegrity (tikcc.un) of
had the testimony there could
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[31] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 31
of transmigration
Nahmanides there is
passage referred to aby
tik.un to is
Recanati this
fou
Ha-Gemul,100 where it is said in more general
already alluded to the fact that there is a tilkkun
tions..." which Recanati took to imply a referen
'ibbur, although this term is not distinctly mentio
was, therefore, on somewhat shaky ground when h
tion of Nahmanides' doctrine of tiFkun through g
ticular "testimony" by Recanati (# 2, 60-73). H
Nahmanides' allusion to the "great mystery" to
30:2 is hardly more convincing, since nothing is
gives a clue to the doctrine of the eventual pu
souls, including those condemned to eternal pu
It is only some of the Kabbalists (Recanati and
who read the notion of a general restitutio in in
of transmigration into the Nahmanides text. It is
Bahya ben Asher, one of the three kabbalistic in
text in question (# 2, 73-80) had this particular
Nevertheless, Aboab felt justified in drawing def
as to Nahmanides' position: "Thus unto thee it
thou mightest know that the sod ha-?ibbur was no
for the Master (sc. Nahmanides) as far as tikun
and after the tenor of these words He made a covenant with all
souls of the house of Jacob that they have a share in the world-
to-come, as we shall explain" (# 3, 1-3). In view of the fact that
this view was shared by Menahem Recanati, the teims "no share
99 I.e. the question why the punishment of karet is sometimes not applied.
1oo Kitebhey, II, p. 291.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
32 ALTMANN [32]
in 'olam ha-ba"' and "b
dicated a state of thin
redress through transm
refrained from revealin
Yet there was a "comp
reincarnations, the num
times but could reach
the Sefer Bahir (# 3, 3
instrumental in bringing
and that the completion
the coming of the Messi
Kabbalists as Me'ir ibn
Zimra (# 3, 14-25). Abo
authority than the Zohar
Tora, Rabbi Shime'on b
a passage in which, he
no account denote eter
"limited time" (zeman m
tion that the sod ha-tic
to what would otherw
buttressed this rather
ibn Abi Zimra's Mem
veritable quarry for th
the traditional view of e
not considered as the f
means that one that is
He imposes upon him tra
ahar temura) ...and aft
him from one rung to
until he assumes again
ning" (# 3, 33-45).101 A
borative evidence for t
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[33] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 33
doctrine by the theory of ti#kun in Isaac Luria's Sefer H
wanot (# 3, 43-47). He concluded this part of his treatise wit
sweeping statement: "There is no doubt that the words
Zohar and the words of our rabbis, of blessed memory,
words of the Kabbalists, peace be upon them, are all hew
one rock... and that the term le-dorey dorot denotes a
time, not eternal punishment..." (# 3, 49-53).
Having answered the first part of the she'eld posed at the
ning of his responsum, Aboab now applied himself to the
"What did the rabbis mean by saying, 'The following h
share in the world-to-come' ?" Morteira identified eternal pu
ment in hell with having forfeited one's portion in the "o
ba'. Not so Aboab. He offered two possible interpretations
latter phrase. According to the first, it means to say that th
of the sinner will not be resurrected in the eschatological
colam ha-ba' denoting the period of resurrection (eolam ha-t
The fate of the soul is of an entirely different order. Her u
bliss is assured through the purifying effect of transmi
According to the second interpretation, 'olam ha-ba' is th
of souls in the hereafter, following death, and having n
(helek) in it does not signify the exclusion of the sinner's so
this realm altogether. It merely means that whereas the righ
have their own special - one might say, private - compa
therein, the sinners are placed together and live in comm
we might say. The second interpretation is put forward only
the first has been discussed at considerable length (# 3,
The resurrection of the body, Aboab points out, spells th
pletion in physical terms of the completion of the spiritual
of the soul, and the soul which has achieved perfection
united with that body in which she acquired her integri
intermediate bodies in which she lodged during her many
tions had not been created in vain, for they provided opport
for improving the soul's quality. Aboab mentioned in th
nection the difference between gilgul and 'ibbur, promising
plain the distinction later, which he forgot, however, to
obviously meant to say that in certain cases only spark
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
34 ALTMANN [341
soul, not the totality of h
body (# 3, 55-67).102
Aboab found proof for th
the kabbalistic tradition
Joseph will be a reincarna
of Nebhat. How could such a view be reconciled with the rabbinic
statement which denied Jeroboam a share in the world-to-come
unless it was understood to mean that the body of this man would
not be resurrected, without denying that his soul would be purified
and thereby become worthy of Messianic rank? (# 3, 68-72). A
clear utterance expressing precisely the same view was quoted by
Aboab from Samuel de Uceda's commentary on Pirkey Abhot
(Midrash Shemu'el).103 There it was argued that the phrase "The
following have no share in the world-to-come" could only mean
that their bodies will not be resurrected because the Talmud dis-
tinctly said: "He denied the resurrection of the dead; therefore
he shall have no share in the resurrection of the dead." At the
same time, de Uceda stressed the availability of the soul's redress
through the purifying effect of transmigrations (# 3, 73-84). Aboab
found support for his interpretation also in "two pillars," viz. the
Zohar and Cordovero's Pardes Rimonim. From the Zohar passage
he skillfully distilled the theory that the original bodies of those
who denied the Divine origin of the Tora and the resurrection and
of those who denied the existence and unity of God would not
rise again; that other bodies would be built in their stead (in
which the soul could lodge during her peregrinations); yet that
even a single miSwad done was sufficient to secure resurrection. In
other words, he tried to prove that the Zohar too understood the
Mishnaic statement about those who had no share in 'olam ha-
ba' as bearing on the fate of the body at the time of resurrection,
102 On the difference between gilgul and 'ibbur see Scholem, loc. cit., 219
ff. Cf. Emanu'el I;Iay Riki, Sefer Mishnat Iasidim (Lemberg, 1858), fol.
43a-45a.
103 Samuel ben Isaac de Uceda (1540-?), a native of Safed, was a disciple
of Isaac Luria and HIayyim Vital. See Me'ir Benayahu, Sefer Toledot Ha-'Ari,
Jerusalem, 1967, p. 177 f. et passim.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[35] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 35
midrashic
paradise notion thatwith
in accordance every
the .saddit. hastohis
honor due own
him; compartment in
moreover,
that even those who have no merit whatsoever receive a measure
of bliss from the gracious bounty of God.104 Ezra ben Solomon
of Gerona (whose unpublished Commentary on the Aggadot was
unknown to Aboab) had stated:o105 "You will find in many places
that the rabbis, of blessed memory, said, 'He has no share in the
world-to-come', meaning thereby: He has no free place (pena'i)
to himself nor any treasure at his disposal and under his control...
and one who has no merit stands in a place where many others
stand." Bahya ben Asher and Abraham ben Yehuda Elimelekh,
the compiler of the work Likkutey Shikhehad U-Fe'd, quoted this
passage, and Aboab drew on their quotations. He also mentioned
the use made of the original haggadic motif by the Zohar HIadash
and by Menahem Recanati in his Commentary on the Tora (# 4,
1-15).106 He even went so far as to suggest that the restriction of
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
36 ALTMANN [36]
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[371 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 37
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
38 1ALTMANN [38]
feet of the righteous" me
of the righteous who raise
which the same Talmudi
the worst offenders, does
In a similar way, the rab
serve him for ever (le-'o
Jubilee year. The expiess
Messianic era in which "O
generation cometh" (Eccl
to mean: The generation
the cycle of transmigratio
of David arrives. Then al
need of returning to ear
"They go down (into hell
is: They shall not rise (by
the righteous who go down
recalls in this connection
which depicts the openin
in hell who respond to the
"They have no share in t
in one of the two ways su
the ultimate admission o
in question. Aboab mentio
that after the cessation of
no more proselytes will
room whatever for the e
maining sections ( # 6-8) o
aspect that has not been
as matters of historical i
final section of the text pr
Disclaiming his opponen
Aboab wrote: "Moreover
the Kabbalists without un
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[39] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 39
said, 'All say what they know but not all know
(# 8, 17-19), the implication being: Morteira say
while I know what I say. Who was the "wise m
remark is cited here? It is tempting to relate
to an anecdote which is mentioned by many h
the only source of which is Johann Christoph
Hebraea (III, 709). The story is that Antonio V
Jesuit preacher and Portuguese diplomat, when on
to Holland, went to hear Menasseh ben Israel
preach, and when asked for his opinion about
merits gave the following reply: "Menasseh ben
he knows, while Aboab knows what he says."1
true, it must have been widely discussed at the tim
seem most likely that Aboab alluded to it in th
quoted, substituting, however, Morteira for Me
He would have been able to take it for grante
understood who the "wise man" was, and enjoye
tation. Yet there is a chronological difficulty w
been unable to resolve. According to his own ac
to him),113 Vieira had several discussions with
and Menasseh ben Israel in particular during hi
when on diplomatic missions in the years 1640 and
on the other hand, that he could not have visite
because he was in Brazil at the time, delivering
bolster the morale of the Portuguese in their st
Dutch. It was only in 1646 and 1648 that he we
King Joao IV to Holland,114 and established co
114 See J. J. van den Besselaar, Ant6nio Vieira en Holland (1624-1649), (Nij-
megen-Utrecht 1967), pp. 8, 12, 14 f. No dates are given by J. Lticio d'Azevedo,
Histdria de Antdnio Vieira (Segunda Edirgo), I, (Lisboa 1931), pp., 139-141.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
40 ALTMANN [40]
Jews. 1640, the date given
1646. Now since he did not
that Aboab was absent from
until he returned in 1654
sermons with those of Me
It is not known whether h
completion of his nine yea
the Amazon delta. Hence
Israel and Morteira whose
he listened to Morteila's pr
of the fact that he tried u
logical disputation.116 The
garbled account of what a
referred to in Aboab's Nishm
Vieira. Even assuming that
1654 and before Menasseh ben Israel's death in 1657 Vieira had
an opportunity of hearing both, the fact that the treatise was
written as early as 1636 and copied in 1648 precludes the pos-
sibility that Aboab was quoting Vieira. Who the "wise man" was
who anticipated the Jesuit's remark remains a riddle.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[41] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 41
TEXT A
I If t7y11i ft21r
vol ?xfivo ?n 1vi aon1 3 N lamm ' z11 9 trit ]ftil two nx ?16a' sg 8 m1 1
raftNz1 1i9om ??jm1 Ispmmi til x1 moili g3 m1 lo.NSW m91y9 -fn m
nx am onT1 rmi Ni m 8N? ' ovIo ri 1 12 imm1 muiY m])i 11 ;g* ;n?m
01Wt t 14 1*71, '111t) '8 * ' NW t 1i ' X? a'in tfj3;@'T j Yawn 1t 1317Tin ml-1
tri-imium m*,izv* -or nirn rimso, rittvi m*Dwn i~ ,w aw i3?iyn ift 1om
6.t2.t 7*34 Nl 3Y I }151(' 7 1974 a r31y 9 .rrnv ib rinvi 01 T' 0rm% '1 1
?WIW'9 L3= n?21i/PW nM13N1t "242Y -1'1? RZ 131` V-1.1 031,1 @Tl ol
.11"D;I' N11611 012ftia l $irnm $N t17 ",tjW;l WttK'ft w zn itiorion r'2iatii mNr' lin
13111 1"7 13M V1 112% 41VIO 171VIDI 13t13110il rmi 1 i 3 11"2 1 Ill0= 1010DW
.3 ,K 1DN lK
.t ,fl WW' b
.2 : ,l 12 s
.1r , 1' 11201 6
. ,=? MV 7
.Nt-m ,N ' tWn ): 8
."' ,k 6"1:12t 9
.. ,1 TrlD ; lt
t ,T 1#41" 12
,-1 12?32 13
.An , S irryl is
Y'1 ,t t S 17
.1,1~' }lst83 KNbDln ; N ,T 8-1 17
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
42 ALTMANN [42]
in -,= 13DW11 1IN Sa@ 0X 13?W? X",-I MI-"Y271 'in 7DIRM .90nll rl1'9 VXNWl 40
,Inn .111 Vl? *1110-,W .1'". RAl-"Ir 7n ;r1RND1 - 31 .711 .39011? Allj?*r
n1"'1 *101i2-1 l ?IY 67110-1 RnADII) DI 1mmwv Dolm -1?31 jip~ p10o 11bNW
UNI -1 110 It 1SX10 N Z3101# DN j t91 n 0 ty0 19?jj tY 0D13 t3N 27 nirfyl
"NW ,I l12= ;j ,lt2 7"611gt0 ; 0 ,US ='"1711t Hrl01 26 ..X ,~, Y.I'. 25
nn ,Ill n131 27
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[43] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 43
.0731 'jDW ,i tV 32
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
44 ALTMANN [44]
wDTr1 v (12, '"RS 3'n9- vli ,nin Nr1i ) n ' n -,vo r t ,Pr tv on 42
:(33 '12Y , "bln , - N ' 9 l'fS?2yo' i 'l llm) l, 'on mipum Dimsmi NmmmND
.1 2lllP1 7 1" 1 Ig111 '1i1 ni n110mi vl-voirwri ?=m ... D mNt I-pri irn-
.mmvri mn trrimvvmDnl i m JD m Nv pi ... nilT 1-irr
h: P4 -0j tP ' -l iu'my1 "S "3 1o rn " IvWDVV' 1fRT-pi rip 019 '1 43
n" Im1 m" nim rmi 7 t Nb ...mINmm inow w1 n mtvmW n17mi 7- wu m -urno
;1ibi p1DD3 11111 DTY'~ a'0* 08 Di ' fl97 flVNtZ? n' n ' "t W"N;Ii
n , Inb ,l" rin NVON1,W 'I I ' 1N7 1' - '"' T7 jn- T1V27 1 " 44
.N ,T' I"i 45
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[45] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 45
nlP81D2 311 '8 1 7718Zt'lN 3"$ '3 110337 n"981 .'131 ;r3193
NX jol10n t1t 46 wl l131; V0 W t34 N $SDt ;Vo' JVk
?v ir?-mn 47i tsri 'i3 o"n v"lnn pw .-nn-ina t'ryw r
W1N'xll?3l~ P 120i --1 N2- 16t 1? r 3"?31 D"Am 7171n.9 '9
am-'l-mT nN vIom-,* itn1 '0 71Y1 4No7 ti mso1a?3 Tib
.1YV3 -mTripy ?Yl Dn 0 ,'-,I ni' M i ny-7 D 13 "
wi=x3 3"099 i 089 7' rmy7' 12 =*2* w-,90 ?tvv ziN ;
lkN 2"119 Yin 'Ift Wb JIM11 MIMC1 331 0 MT 1n1D P"?
0 01-11- ' ?3X Y= 't?' NW ?Dl D-T-i Ml 31 P 1" 1 1
'D ' N11DS N1 1 617= mli M D31 .y 31-m rfmy p 11f 7* lo
Vy193 0 3113 0 intD 13'nK 1'lnlt 13iy 1 W6171 VX n11Do ?"- 140
''11 0"YM XTV7 I=3 013-1211M ro-11D2 I-10DW 13111tt 0137 01 '3
rival-inn 7-3Y ? 1 n09 '31 w"n K"?,.,T t nrtl-vin mn
1mut1 -m1 mrlioin imtm wCoa11 W319 818 013? fN so:Lw
qr tW n13'r N s-t7w" r1 Xi 3t15 W?2n1 3 1y 8 n2II
Ntt01 nwD n??= ms-um =yz tft -irr 0 Dmv -l. " vui 0
&'D MIZ11 (1 1 7 2 134- 1rI t'7 ywo triton1 LW in t
'I:) M7 17 HI"M-3 .(374 '-M) -is 00 nn mitr xvr,? -1-) ",r rirm
P'irr in b"t T3917- 1irrnNn r 1k vi ,insi t3tiv rr r1r1nn vvDaV vinn
"=- IIX Y-17 19381 981@ = Wih DM S -DB ,'1D 1 ? Inl -10=O1
14"12 13VIV Ni W o 1W 1 ,lrt"M i'T i m iinn I 1INviv 4IM-1 ,1ri1
-PV2 1"100 $ N ,0111 "lll }11-711 MiM-* 7"-T-11-1 t000% 7 i11 0N
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
46 ALTMANN [461
'r3 t}3y .3"2W9 2" alm 1 OSI-1 Z 1'721m43N 114 - '1 tt MAOI 73 3 1 3'?13 11), 117 5
m142 77 2 fu3 13 Intl I13,111u 7 3n 13 4:9"I 3A r I "-t 13- 9 1WR y 1 I371 N Dr WV2
PDWWW 113 31ll3 t N1 ;irnr1100 31' 0988 0 it 'ND 1817~ND 3131 00170~23~
Sn Ibt 13?' N1 333313 '310113' $#tU Yt~1323 310B ' 'h 8 3 '3'17117 D37l
v1 mln; N inr m 0i ron 0snnit i1ftym ml ; tb itib f1 .m"ar v"nIvr i 120
DEI1NT 3"A1 1,7 11 1 J 1 t1ipn 18701 A"I1VOI f131? 31 .)V 120
irnminin trn 0m ftina 1 trft n'nivnIi n N i rllit mr.-I I= Anin -1I1R
'610 .1NW ?Dx 172 HV1I1 .n"y 1"IT ftIvM D"YVI'Dbni 001no3l 001l t7N in
"jM 6 Nml-I- '1 mi 100it'1 Ilot t3V 1171 1n1lt= 1111-9M- 1-1,V 7I-1n17
Ntt1 naivin lown ir i 0 Nivy16-123= ?"? NW XV 1*1 I*t M293191" 125
lit?~ NY~D pmW 3ND 2111 D11 nf D (MT31 P'3019 P*711 '101 P1110bi
rnvp nivzv tunr ,-6 tat in, rrvi nif~trivi t~vp-gy trno -, -*mn rnInutll 3
Dt3 ftT 3 1J1I 1 olli C21K 1 VDI 112"67721 ?=tS 4TT *= D42117 t333V ?130
1988I n'131N nzlnf t11'Dl 091 9"t ftlD5r f8 ;1 13 If~ W1Vl7' D nll 513#*(1 52
.NKO' m u,4" ??1w tj-1 2 , bmwit pnmy 1r ( 'i7 '1 9)5
.'r : "h1 s53
.J) ,;,5 TI ,T"jV flfln1 01n7 "Y Nlt31NK ,-jNjjn 1 ' s' 54
.2 ,n -7 13VC 55
.07 'D11) n0 ,t1tV 56
1,', ,kN ,NK - N ," 71 ,T"I 3 ; I102? ,(pk1f7) 0112 pisr '1' ?1kVZ1N f112ln 57
.011@17 a , ' 0 p,V1V1 S 51871
.'o{ '0 , WWWW 19W58
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[47] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 47
?Y 1 1"Dil, *n mrlft3 1train3 4i)171 'f '8 t1 4 1 I1.131ta j3' l j1 '3 '5
ron Di'Tm1Ni 'N/x vD 7,i= 11 riSxi ys ?y ftinm i DN rrm
1IVIV" 1D 1Wo l 'n 61'1fl1 Dl 7ntt IDN n rln miyr fnt 60#
7n j Vrjft? u p3,tuin 17 t 2t3WI1 0 I7n38 r3l 09n 8 62 TV 79
.D ,t1'7 P 59
.,l ,n 0 61 st .1 i , 6t1WWW 60
171na Ilum -ivlv '13b-7mm ril-lin -'Om I~q~ ;1"411 rlPl .9tomip
.bibi 17 ,080 11I'CS "viivwzr oviiv in stS09i msNim 1
.:')-t~l:*
M11161
N' I; V~b~; 01, =r1000
innt21 0111=1 11inl
fIn 1$inIn * m mintl
1998 rviin424
9
on'l Jn" tw tbn 3't311(Vw' ( I1n ,t30) M1 W014n mn1 'An1H 11 M ,(1, ,m,2D m 4 )o
744 .Inull1 14-1mD vtv-l wa1. (,0 , 1 An -17 eMINtr , -i11 ar4P p-1
.a.1 I13 0a.
P"-17
.3 ,;1Y 71 ,n011{* 11N 0139 'D 71
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
48 ALTMANN [48]
77 If3tflV
113#~~~~n~t 1T Vn
rivi"tui DW
,mm 7
NW
1'P 1Np n 7 n .9
.031mml-im mou b"v fipv
n813b 1"MV n13M $DB JW
(It-in msrm T-m III= ? -n'lntn
.(hn lutc t831~ 31"919P $"1 tf
.(9t~IV=1 19 rin 1 p ?vit) i
mm -*3UTinw unm 0vmvlmz
-71N7mv' pni a In v lm e -no
m$"l U107= 11SM 001 11 09
09121 tDsWWtW ;1 USE37110
1,M12 ;u T-I
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[49] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 49
.$"BSI 1314 tiSn13W %V4V bInN 84 3"a ?17 'i n t wjD `$ I;t,
8s:5"t- w'riI nN WUnit W1 urt fm im ii ? )71 u'r12i1
m9z limm vivin p3988nW1 1iorinvviim 7l8 ~ m lirm 1,invlm
pirrimn imp iftinrim xn N i wrin -Tp vp iv ii 1ruirim v
71,1ipN a rBy 1DN Nis1 Ietn -m 'it 11i im inN Wpri
i'(DJ NSop imnml 61 my-im #801y vimixS 1,1h
Ni'nr 17win N4 1 -poi x y 1n In1n Jnri T limt
kt'it)0 tnhi 1P1V NM1 4I73 86T$ lTl 17 nIN XTW)i 53 #8 99 WMitft JiniN7 T 175
orana d $ N 13'Tv a N No1 tri# #113 TN vvim rinv S-Iem 'm WInn
N'owim, tromm vuom imni m19 11 .i"Dm N vS4 1In= iWT I*W W*
92'TS nDW19 P'W31 niD@ 19877t 09710~ 1NWln~u 15372'# 9 p T~y 2l~
tlYt'lb10 PstNDt~ 1310 WN11 W2'S1 ln$f Di'991t n837 1187t #97tt 19# 5a
.?"ASy '11 1. 180
.J3WV21 .r13818 01X WW - S 1221 nrn rini i nrr r Nmtxn nnri
.ttWR ll .}2 111( .723ftliftl amri aNtbivli .atirllwi .6 irm .innon
a2n nri .am1 1 931 10 .D aim rant3 .ITPS 99fli? ."DM17"It WtnTI
7*t' nt raTl vo nal Nf 16 illi 100 o rnri Irimt ploirm n0vwoi rn1 185
'i ;1 'll~t;1$ ...11 N'IB2 pWlltt~l $'111m :r"T1 a3 Yn nrmn ... 1 S wpt
...0$19' 13WK 3119 DW9~ Trl'0 y18 nznin 'tn l11BM ,...91NWt Klp~
.2-M ,jtt i ,91' 1-,4vrlWVID M11n1 lit '0 so
.t3 ,t =14 81
. ,1 ,K ?tt* 82
2 ,mn ,M0 r'vtNw 83
.7-pm :ri
S 84 inon
5"MS$ ;01190; tpW ,init~~ tW 13000 D"S D'OUSEY 12K .2 ,3(~ 71 ,tral
pthim? DIf2K; 1'f1 31 jZ n01 ; DW I ipn2 DW :;1.rnr$iz n
Dll-p:2 1wunt00 1N tn-T 134H ;onrls 13p1 162in ;NMI OI2 b 1(3,11 M
mn-nit xvinr : }.1 iobn '*nN l-imm ;nn -T1pt aw-m ?p t Wp ; 1
pingz mimmN ;- 4mm milmn mi ;- nom Ipn= -11 N'1 ;xni -imm
.v* rvwxi mpnz pml7 ri-sx-T - Inrim)
3111n.61 n... U7@ ??t r V D"N (')?2V D"H) '122M1" :I ,bt ;1? 3tn @
1 973) prnmmNT xnj-?- v-1*9 mr tvwi nintv 1171?mn-T prx In :ttw WI
...NDilb '$btft N *N to *0 712
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
50 ALTMANN [50]
?npn ?n ?N ftylo, N l 't f 0u
17,0 N1 01Banm tsn 13 0yltri1n
ywr tivit 5? f.vi rvYIvo ?v
4t' iNm ,3 n 1 t r "IYnn rim
5N i1n5 1 mn nwit' 5D3 1iim
1inn3 'n jfi rv snx '2vi -17
5n 073 rion pkitz imnaDr t
5N uion w1iw n1 Win 55h Dnn
123n $11= 9112"I'2w 5m 19
f101yr) tyn In$ 31 467 0 tjl
jijt& ?? W n S NW
) :m" n 89
.,,,=3l3: "033
.12SWty bn 90
91
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[51] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 51
litt11PY
nN imilonmivwn Tim
liM n D; N imwi
122130 aw
19 mi
;IlD m
03
3 0 113~ D='IDT 000V83 itTn 07ni
136 Wil 1 1I2 311?ZAX VIM* In rv
129~ i~nt D'bWW 'Ti~ .12 1--13 7"0
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
52 ALTMANN [52]
TEXT B
13211 20,1121t IPMS9 V"3 *'D Ri' 1" I M '91 "T fIsV mnVS'211 ?
2 t?f jjt' 1'7~i)l nngit ?V nf) 1 1n 'i 17 7 g 1 Vl)t .InV71 I 7
nvim D3 nxtiopi 4wn'0?RNA 3 17198j- jNA 130j l1n'o T In3 7 4ST91D#J5
1011Nm 5
mr" ov imintn
MS33 7D 41'tIN : r1
r"A'D nnnn lV4t 11#
lim ixm31ir iSr
112 It 13,711'"72S
"1Ir 121DW2 1=3O
*t 7w'ai gflZvv 1
-i lrato N tni' nw
t1?lvn1 ar1niI iitN
109mn aa rn1i3v i
VM011i 61Ph 81T.
vm? min O ;m ?.2? t Nmuml trrr my Alm n%766 tr;m *?-lr l IK .linn m Pimm
mriv? T1rw rint? 'vmN~ tbi oln nvft? Mi tri *r1 i =211 W1117 1
1ftr t)119 "'12- t? = Mn1nn '11l* '41"=n Wttl VDI? W1IMn"1 W'llt
agw r1m= IND ri1w tw mwit -mol amB 1n 21 irNw 1 vtona WinV9 25
.9Wl7'll.,I1 ,: ~'","2
2'4 76
.A ,3 * '16b= O
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[53] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 53
aD5ba tli'3Di W thnY Chb98'J 19N 0~~ YS13 993% D' NS 13DU
rmyn'i 7nt3m
imo, min wrivi
wfyaqNhm
1 5inxi
livne, ir"i
a 11 =5 5mivirim
0n wo7,iinm mn1r
i in twim m
.';1 nKD' ;1SY 1293 1937~ 3011 Db~ rrtD MVSr nDM ?NT 'DW~~
=#1lJI WS53
N';1; P'IN; M;titt,;l
M1 I Z315V n t310
in 31 Pl T1-21P 1Stt
fl"tl l WN
Y0197 alS l3121V
l 9975 1012 1
MW rvui
wrol tll'ilt -llY 1t5n,im
5n ntopw ntllftl '0#9
#qni~~~ 'IIW 5Dfti
nv miwmt l P 1invrno
mf rintm W11
1imri
R11 7vlNa
i'173 vi MY
NW01 i-myrrin ton
7 ngMIT 1rMr
3""I72 T12-12nl T,11"DI
1no hXbi 2= rl613
3 50
D1-21D71 X51 ftt '11 %TV 111MOM ;lnlyb IWX31 1 V =t
min -hrmn w ty0-in urim m5Nn1 t1p0rii innion t mu7nw
nwx purn me orn mi nt =a 12mmmt3r in~i vo ;*D5 nirm
.n ,l? 1rl,'110 11
,to 1 ,to: jjl INS 14
., , ,? 'IW 15
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
54 ALTMANN [54]
111211,11=1tI 4n 11B "D 6*2TIM 112"rIDST 1,1033' imTWM M IVI1.1 URI 2V
Nl tin
lt? '7 fl3
m.1' jt
YbKZt1?Z I 5fl1
fl nflli )T m
lt ?y ?1jfolft
712N 1Vf4
flmZ fl lf 1,9Kn'i
f11K ' n1PB
XlI 1DN 1j16
6011"
N" '3 4n mm ovim r"381 1imN 19?Ntm im nlm I '*N K XN 121fn17 60
tt? ,:) Inv= m5n~ ~wt rilgir ii rmni ~ nsirm onswi, ixt 16 1111 I~n? rjjni
tNran vm f17v 0n- imW1n' rflK ,fljt1n nz' im is1rn8 vbm pon
24tD P4l X " W23 t'l 7 j tt I 7,t3 13v 1 z37fl 80 19m mir a i Ii
11131 134?tjn n~l J~nt jnlptn 11tt lll nl~ mprrul TI% ; ? j w1inN ullt t~lf?I
Is ?T'1 r1fl7 - 2pT ft1?Z1 n1 f pl 1"1fiZ~ T'17? T Zl '8 TD 3 mip 65
0 181,71 13"'I 13"3017T 2=2 1 13Y V2*1 Own 13-11 -71 m 6K 85
13"731
xvini n 31,811W
lsml ti mm 11311V
y mnlqv 0i3*n
tl mTI"
NSt=n
r $11mul ir ' in
vi~ m al?*ir wiwl31 oftl1owt
v w1 i nb1r
nwo ovi vinnro 1 tmo03 0 v-0 - Yf" r fTi 178 wiftv * tt 18 tim-rn
miftim murpro zi* %i? i o-v utal ttt viiin -mm ram ri~tt vri fLNtln* ?nv
131;1 M1111"nX nI r M, In999 tft= ' 19 b; ?n nI6 1,l1 411f19 n9 i70
billayniWWl 713a# 51mor Imy7 1911 wD nyI 19 20.1? ftm mmorr vnzl N iorri t 70
Iri1rmn mi Psio 1vri mvin 1i3u1 20,mt itir g nrim Ox wor* y mrl mm i3f
.Nm, jv P tvln 01 is
Itn ,tt 12183 19
.X ,1 n1312 20
III ,j SWW'l 0"Y 21
.2 ,SD tDWOD 22
.t , Inn 134 23
OT ,1 Inno 25 .1n- n :S"itS 24
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[55] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 55
TEXT C*
13,1372 1 [0
mon < >
a-loiryp i irni vxa= rniy- . tnN rninm >) t 0 n vzo II I mnrn No1o 1 1
001 :181@~~H~V 981@DW2 SN MWltb~ .1NI123 NWI 1'; N'f 0**03 PC'W219 3 .nP9158
II I 0120 [I128 11 1 (: 2"099 (i~~ 00% (INWV 198 01bN2 .itW2W~; Ditti ;r113
II 1 1 uni1 1n 3 ;*wl ?Nmjpan 2 12nnn Irlin ?nlpall II 3 nDvnbr [bbnP
,I a = [?"-t - mroil 4-3 111 l b - t3-'7VDtT V3N11 3-2 11 ' 7"-t [1"1'M II 11-1711 =1 2
ii n x rn-1in [n13 12 15 11 = rirnipn W7211-pVi 12 11 2 N V1=21D binl1=2m 9
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
56 ALTMANN [56]
w*3) lo mw:n v 11 ux i
ftmr'i v oiTD 0t2m= zr
xl? mlnl w D 1rr1v ,4,in 3 mmirm, m vrm w Ni1 7n irm min "T
nom mD v 4Dar mTrin v lim-in nt umm7 I1n nx in n, '17 11147
'0
"I-:$31z'Ib
1817PN?1
is.= In 01D'~
n =imw;rn 0**0 137'~tp,, 89718
O I D1"tl P~ tWi~n
ll l j3'- i}191D?'y
,"T1'ltV , 1,h"nto
7Y"l2TD
-T.I lyv-lm n"ID3 Ift3 13?ly in Irm nmm 1W m .*l)t t9n? 0 D It 13'N
aIft -oi.r " n." ,nN Pwimn nhn nWn3V " ani, N1301 "Tn nn1n 1 ImI nI n30
"IT I;'l X . 61 1 4;2M"' 1 "l l ; '21 Y 1 21 111,HI . Y-T "l ? t 111 6II o 011 1 1,'198 1s
I 2 0Dpn ' a,,p? [1,,nM 28 1i 1 X &'1 f [t?I 2 27 ii 112X H1 [H71t 25 7[ I 47 m ,'21
.l' ,S f , lN' f D 18
1,2n7 NO=,: 31 MOrW 31' IND7 .2'3 m10piJ n2N S-3W ?W7n0 2u K ,NbD l,'4l-O 12
7:n 4Y .1T r1 ,13D 12 " ,IU 1n '1 ',. ID. M K? p1 ims1 ' ,l- I T 3'7
.t ,3 ; 1 ,t 7 l,7112tl ; ,"
.A ,n 'W 1v'1"1
, iniri DDo1 is
i,:: nWa,
mV01 11971 092
nin- n tm,'z
113w IIV.=72m1 niniW
rr M-1D o in I- 8N120n
IN t 11 3m"inur
0 n 9p Poo.mp1o It
7D a *Ivn Cl 19 'I,,nn n
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[57] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 57
nnj7088TI$#ft'j llin ftrnTA 18 , ri* ivaim?wmunx m
iiu anfm [rnu'tr 3a min 1 l'fl rX1 'Ofl 361 1. 1',[I'8n 351M K I'TIV VD'W'L 35
t1rv 3 iriD in 11 twinK 20ri 2o.@t ; fh,2112M,7 ' K ,00 1. 3901-'
22 rihmxvv not) ?vn rrizi-mv inzi rivii tt? r o mg # Vm21 iltfr i
nxin ?rIrw 'q ;mn?% b1 t3wir1 ,t'53 Z3 N 081 tI -ft 03W 23 'W ma1 low
ornno D1P 13 1733 -mMS rm Itrun 41 24001g1 1 'Itpn nj5?
071=1 14M 1I7m727 SN 10 .""M = IlN 111itl '1D1 8716M %0 11271 40
mn3 7Nm ziy-T- rin vm Inri jvnm? rr :lio onwi 17i In 1 , nnsi
rlW1r wm-* }'N .1'93 9m qi1-t Nn u 1 6 P1 r7n t' Dm -mnt un 1 , rmpri
111*1 .1 37 1r1137 13sy A"vvli 71yi a'lzt l 01$1 m001oe .13T*
}*2113 tg'1N1 l'"'33 NON =1";IY9 1ph~ DiL 1?Nt llm :5"tl as xl"D ;r317
-innni .XXXII '-u ,n pT ?vim ?wn? --* n1io ar wn1y? iln 71- 24
NM I-Pin~n IC2" :7121 - MIMU 132 ##n1Dn IMDW MY11Y31 '? s27T INBM NIM NI
.-n-no mIii wn -T- TinNmn iw ?m :qlvm Isp qsvz i7u rimmu mm1 .t11-n
?NMvm -I=1 wr "O1n 0 "M- nNMD t7 N20 Nt V-t7ia- ?NT YM1 X? -T-P ?Z=
;rAl ~ l :tt 9r1r :jnivZl3 "D n'nn= " aM 1142- "'lT Vpt N (XLVIII ?mu)
71 11wtl ji m1n0n 'I-*n pt ?yl Jun nnnom p- mnnimv -11-P"m -i ID1W orpS
... n1nn 173 VlIY M 1Vn nltn =b6 7XV "D DY IN1 1"'M 'I11M.2 -NI n X* M1
11361V nil ="YP .-r t,7am l.9 0 1 710l9 10 * IWi W1y N1x11 =D6l rin jPri mt mril
.onsl Mlyn -nian " in wly0 ?rrmli ,I 12V linyrh 7'12m vin
.1 ithi 25
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
58 ALTMANN [58]
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[59] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 59
281ti l "11?21173# t3ljt 1 J*ttt l WEj$' J' :1?2X 4 12*7 31r 00 3 I131 1 198
1-1? rivi xvil029 xml lu?xi -i nn0T 1Di tr-inwn ??inn riv1 v0
DINSW 111191 0111,11 14,12. 4TIVV01 161Dl7l 412t t3wN18litim rnit ?tom
7f611tR 1nn 1 KI-i NJ-,IV bit1i Vj190 V-10 1? j ' l V y1 s: V "T1 10
Jjg?4'X W71" 41"XI tPl,'710 ?n n-I~an -Nlkt $t,-JV 'in 6X`Jn'oj lDH X JDJ Vol,-
1t-7m tN ft 1Nmm tN~ 1n-WWv r1in ?!; tF? 7 Vjn j tC nX 'fl1t1 *DT ,n
linnin~ll WV3D mSwill lV0 12 T1til PW17 I 1t NY 1 lysl 9 vrv k fl N iri
?z 1ixvz m-n1o101 -r1Nxi miriv rrnvl? ni1ri rummi vCi -, 0twx1
-l TMR N1 klD 1Ii trin j)n MI3MI WTD910 t3"W. IV-,l 0 P1201718 15
?n lwnt xv1811i i n t 1 $1 mv~i kp1-7-1 i Tgv0v-7v 8vv mn w1ur
8 1173 int 1WR T 1 m# in irhm n12 n--rv 0*1un or172 JT 3 1Tanim
von (Na1rinivi r v mrov1in) m8887min vinworn na li# T 7-nx,
17nvottntirtv irriv vmn rmm w-7"z9 * "Arn inn ivnn z jntt 'jngy
I-VW MIND 01 171040$N1- X1102:1 90 1 Wnl MVZW 9l1 T1R1. I -*= h20
vi0omv rin nn 7-lizi mmu irm mrn -8110 p rimtNirm n .'in inn
. fi ,l Koi" 7
.I ,N k 131 8
.au,"ti 9
.k ,V' 4 "19
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
60 ALTMANN [60]
1'7
,in C1131 772 D T "
D1TR1111DI NW DJT
X11, 1
X14fiv 107x? 1* M3 n 7
lv1vm rm 10
5NX=6121Nfl -,1
nivi 49 il
tbom a
wm?
61n~n *'OR I)V V1 Ill" Wo '
5lItrm Ir m 1TNI .ljli" D
1813 y*20 91 A
WVMS 1,12 114RV 11,
'*-V "3 11 .11731 ?V'3 1X
n5~ua;Ir~~ ~lax~lt~~l N
7D 9111, 0minn IN nel17 u'nm 1 3ml- 1723 .19 11,1 rTJN; 'tn1 61'7inx .11,01001 NTT=
S1313 ftjWN ,1D 11"m N 13 JD 9 0180 010 0 1 0 4
13*'=VN13"IVY1
111'" 0 Y 03nn
1 111B 8 8 pTSri 0D %VS MV90P
13""It Ti n t 00j
t110)VMl v45
n'1613 f11119,311, 11.1 11n41 W 1-12 61 4y , 1121 4
n 111
'10n '40= "'1112113"'11121-1
In ITIR 1f33nX N3IO VIN1 13-TVXn WR?
'1-1-il niWj3YVV
N?jt 7n 11D7 14
IvI1Yu
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[61] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 61
11~b 7"11'31 -1 Dm"0 ' f10 f~I " '? p M f ', Nln "79 1 2 =2" 1pZV r 1m3
11?' 01 1N? W "i99 (90 00% (N 01fNl13 1Nfl fl~18fl11 T' lT'l
i'n n," nr'ton in '~ "nr1 T'in n",M 131' 1111 To1"a"n rn'l"at r 1= n~n "
]W, 9 '1 6IT 160 1 1 : tl'r1 f1 11 r '1Tj [f1V17 n D '~ ~i7 .11 57 II j [3t ? ]I 1 n i
nn311 rm -mv1 zirmnn vit v vC n '1,2 '1311; 1,- 173'18 rim ifrr71-o3n
Dmmlln 3 '4D 7, '= I 1om10*2 m217rl mlm? mv-1 "Inx nn pT 1iv
iqn ?3 innn noi n n nnn '" l -invins av 20ln" i xv ' mrnn oinn
["1 mIn i l l72"1 l n NM,64 I1 7 ,'T1?Z [21 "1N I'"' 611 1 0In mmi NX 65
15ND pl m 1, "1
*m m11: 1i3nr inno 75int
71111 II [j l'l
i 1n[ i6
m1rv
~N i 67
'Nxi] n
n "t
I ]1Smw raNm
it [ nD {i :i 0llo
9 'CD 143DDW 1i WCm I-1 2 1731m -111- 134-911V WWWYl? llmsn 4n Iti Sltt9
.9? zm1 n "arn V711m trim 7 917 im1 n91Sw tz* nv rit 'l Yt -"798 70
in W.) -113.1wl 71t -s5 4n nnn b" t xvi 1?DtN 20 p 51n njnt 13-1-"1, "
1"11 23.44nZ 114nol njiftil 22,0ggj? 6"I'llnn n-1 14-I0 K jW7311 21134=22
.2 ,ni, T
.A totb 72 ni', n,'l s18
.X ,m- 4DD 11 DW , im l W1 19
.0 ,NW2 ,*130 20
t V ... 1V71O 11W V, ~n7 'D"T1 'I)I,l'; .,l :: ,: ?7 ,V'2in ,,. ', i 22
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
62 ALTMANN [621
8390 53 24 1471ny-1 al
I1WDn t31 unt 21 in N 1112W
Z1
13 Ki Tn 'xin'i
71671 pj3'1K 'Ts~'K
f21 -1K DD
W11
Stt1 tN 1IN 9# 1'7 tN 93 13
.*'TIj V1In 25 sK 1K n'17w
int I1ii1 f1tTnul N$1', IN 31y
.rn'o [BR 03 1 tv xvm1 [it
lTtlmlv '40t 111hrlin xti n
ttW4v 0i [ 3 2,t7ly3 [3m n
~'tK1 N #li $1 231'2T ;1b$ 0
6DT WW "11 lnvw ma
11l4'7"itiv 101721ti m i1ni 093" lo 013 ,11 m'l11 "1f12T a1391 21b'u11 ' "D 1'7 ?t 5
Imn t6 4D lin11zi 10,71,47 min ? pll .1-ID -mv ravlull n n." mlivirS a -T 5
b i5 n 3 71,47, 411 11 H 1 NiV"%= 11-71113 Iwnp trr1v f 3"D1 1136311 Titfl
I'1gXA l'W 1i2'12 N' W P'"2 ''Vf 0Y'N~ Pft~2 01@$ D 'l 611 Dn DW1
I163 D BSD -TV 5K '13 1 m1901 iltz WI3 13 w t17 inN nlnv3 0132l h
1J UI j12S f1f It1to1 Vl W n '3D1 27 p -'ri m1l'-I ?w volofn. xggmv
1371 ? w n NY 18 '1m- 1 31 1tts 1f -W1 WW 12; Imv3 vvel -InD 10
n?NX /"N 0X 0 T 'V 131 28 Z3'itttWn VV41 13423V JJJWV? 1-74 1p13 013J Yt3 Sjw
'll26110 62111T1 T"?i s 3071"InKt 114211 'il 1 %1' r 111 $ 'N113 1 29/,nrf 'a1iT
5=l'agn 31 199 t 3031m 3"9 1111 111 '733 Jtfw1 ;I"3pr 1891 092319
.r ,nip rt;In 29
. 0 , -T " -- 1 , if til l'l 3o
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[63] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 63
Ni? m11'1 put r tlt' W ?IN 11N 'i 7t-7 'IN 38, u1 *1 ?3y
- tnW i '161 26-28 111 DXN [198b 20 112 X 11RN2 [ 111MN II N 11*
-4 rljj 14 - Inn mSJ 0 -,1 72 a tDDon 9-1 ?-j ,r" 189 bili ,'034
131- 1riv 9 }TIY Iy inmo... rnvpti?-2 tvnw ri i=-wm 131 mrn ,11-? 2 v i1tori
mm" Txn 'ninlyimn bD 1pr...'1r)'SM MT ?TD ' ,111 I M-1 tmJDDlOn ".1-1081M 91
... ror*1D pI 1 0K3 JW 10 1 7
.2-K ,H17Z rM ,'l 31 m12 ,(T"-Wn) "=1D K-n11pNt ,?" VP ' l fl t ls '0 35
.N ,M l 7 1 a 36
'7 009 AbWM ,11 ll1611nin$ 0 ,to NW1,( "t) n" 11if ,-jj,- 100 37
nb .:9"tl,2 ,N xo Nb,(n"fT) m1muln 1010- 0DTv mm 1 w ,11V 0 -)-Ton wm1wpils.
NnitW1 (Nwimntl : "mimo jvn"it N Ntom T ?"Wi ?n-r mnnm tv'm nn*m robm
i xrNPtrlNx: K"0) ' qn-ym 6 mi WCn o r D 1K,;,14 (m tvi 1: i "t) 1NK7x1pm
5nl KNifWln3 N1o lKnm3 1 K l7 nri1i 1 ... Mt K11ia nf pi Nt K7vv1 (2"T.
p orCt Imml (.0 711 tl K1 t k inth: n "T) .11-110b= btlm .11-m*1 tn3 rbuvi
12 M11 NK?IK K W1'0 rnKr 1 X Nn1wtZ72 P0'07 7Kn KN ?* vn (KTirr WK, :*.2-) 'KW
v1i- '9!7 (m?*0s It : 7'01( ,1" n0-)K?r ") rr mir -w irt J1 38in
S1YtN 513'330 8 11 '91B nNnt 7M N (N ,(H 14 n'T tt081 T) -, 4 n' I -@ 38
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
64 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT [64]
"Nil .11=0 VIDM VIVIN11 I'll!)= Im"11 ''11 Imn 1 2 g1 m 1Z7vi ... ( 17: 1 )n llr 1pirr
.(Mn9w mmor10 o n1 11 11"-.) M-7 811.11)17 X? mI ;Iinmi D 1 .t NT
.fl4'7120 Nrlo0111 r Imb t 'DZ 12 ZtV 1"N 0 J MV 0 ?nIV3,1 DN rilKhlt ?"1 39
-Tt ?"I) mn t3l1llo 11111 IMt N hl := ,1011 ,Il0 bt1 ' N1PBMN? 013-o 40
11721 I-its -Ts":1) 1 31-2 t34-172 Pwwri n w-mi ft r x r- 1 (Ts= mri n nilwn
?MK. Itr W so ?17bKfl 'M 1K 1 11ri inK NmM =n 1.n .., 1s3Zi 'K 1.0?W
K1P2
In ; "OVn3M
Obt3? MVM Z=
111- IVK 1 n=I
t1PS 31 " it
li .017- V'31
M=l=MI81tV
1N ?K tW
inK P.7=$11
1-7tV -MIP90
I111In
111Ml1 "ri .My1 Wi lli KM1,1 " 1 17 in fl Ofl 1 Mfm t9 w K Kj1p IV I p 1 421 4 -T.1=
.. 0, b IN'K 1K T"n WU D X'1n 10113n
2t271 1041 mll %? nnis ' 0ml t341 O' ll 1342b?273 11"nm jjntrj= 1Ti 12'Wt D JtVO :- ttt 41
.34 , V1 1Il 42
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[65] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 65
.2 ,-In I-In10 44
.ri ,U D bit
.n ,1 tr mfl 46
.03 ,~~it3 n b 47
no0. nv 113 jr-rs : 9 ?ia*m niniw I-,= Irmm Un 13n ;I- ,111-11'3'on 48
m z -rnm risni msiri minn minvni xN~m rixi~an ml~n imm 1,4m misnrmn~ nnx
tw1i0,o
b fTOmwn nn11002
V NW n ix-in nw1iY0
~11K't z 'In
~2IDWB
f flKnxK ib p'1
V 10Z ,-Irn 4n xmv '-I
f1'?K912?ZI '1 m3im
.0?fl91111
fltht
.(K ,M? - K ,M1 nI ,1858 11=72W 010-)
,? 11 ,'lit 9I7V ,nl'91b t 1'K1 f 'l . ' #-In V Itfl ?NZ K 132 Mn iT 49
M1I i 31K1 ND'lZ n H6 N7(m..." :(K -"2) t f ii fw lit in=7 Nnm ,=-x
(D-p 1I) MW "3'TDW 13M '21241 =1- 11" 3'71 31 ".1.1 'Mi t3=2 13 t11'T 11731
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
66 ALTMANN [66]
.0 9"14 DW2 11i '1113 PN; 002l IIn~tg11 ' MAD I8# sl 3"iSW (i ~19 J N 0311'
t'1'5Y Dips 89U)'131 '0> 01131 n9 nlllx 5 a1 lnI M :6138 -169 t'6
D *MDl 1,12 19WR 13t"11= 1 W9.=1 6" "n In 131W91 tli ".(,1 1 90
v9D 13= 7t61 VD tlli }*nD 181il l'm0D 1WTV1 P44 0 3Ol n1 1 13190611167'l9WNIl
o1wT ,K1NT r 1 ?K1TL 'i f 1mN 11Km 1ir.lm , ll~ "0 1 5 '0 52
A1 ,"M17T,71 711 01"Yn UT KK1D370
.N ,X 3 67,11t) 53
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[67] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 67
vi" Wfl
flZ m1* Cti
1W. i [9in1'13
3 01183 u Tir
j#"? mn [nini
~1"I7W 9 0
f 'l?1 ribm i
f 1Z 7f
;inV161 617 63 ftjt"j -"D 'tOD n1-1pi -14%1 "ntt i frli nwN -11 .r i. 11 100
.tDB 1o ' ftjtt '16i -0'26 es(jtx njfit 1) pt)6% 7141 640tW -V 3 13@ ?%S; , T I10D
ii11 mvnins Issris 99 111 = r 1-min h110 3 97 11 X '= -) [I'T X 1112 7" 1'2 [J "'* t 96 1111
In1-1 II 1- im 1-110123 11 a'1:1 [*1I 105 11 1 = Xn11l'12?3l -12 1 1 11 t =1 II~ 3 l11 104
M717 4 TN1 t b 13l-4 :)1 1V = Zfl E 1 '11 3110 11n l- 7 "'t IN l t, l1 13 -111 1 1 l- ?
p'l b3 'm-1 )1- rrjym -172nn r- lomNn I-til ,t)ili min ?r .N imn ,013
. .8N t(WltP 11 ;V; .(N ,-= w DoT) 1v0 'D ,o mmiiion p1rinr
1,%3 V 7 62
pnh ,(l"DWE oC'rr11) t0NpKl0 0101 ,11*V1 11 1 fV? 'lb' 0lZ1 071 '0 63
V2 111T p Y' 1Dv v B:(K,Nj ,11NK 0"t) K,- ,0 N ,131 j"1r0 ,1T10 '0 64
t'St3 7"T219 'N W113 '131102 NWtW 0.lK NKZ 1 K0' Nb WK? K i0 K1 KlK
mN rq Nnzftam -rnv- (pinto) lb3t: pWm ?%: mmirn ... 7tirl P121T 'Tbs 7-1-im
....nK' EN~~tl' 889981 8899~ Wi~t3 NVDB 810 1
1 01 WN NW '171 : 3-1 T n"1) '41211:1W= 1741-7jM ?N...p TY DW :1W 2 -65
mmomn so (man) gb (tl!-) -I"3;. I"'t=IY prmlz p re tw ;m (jp@nrom
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
68 ALTMANN [68]
Kn t3 nn ] 115-116 11 1 =,-
t7n)VMV [tl3WmbB~D 119 11
[113 122 il 1 N WlM [).1V 121 11 21 N "'1 ["'D '1 120 11 1 1[1't M9 - Dl] 119-120 1ii 1 m b
SKnlmmin n m0 "mnm nn 7'rn n 4T b 17K1W" ,1m.n "11 o " tP'n w, ',, ,mnilmin
IPrL a3V ;;190 8n..."MM n3ll .91 ',In 01r 2 1XMIXIM 1II: tru Nrimn xt2m
,")n11 minm n in 1K Ti3 ,:...Nmni 'zn III= ,1tn n,0 n=
j01%V1 tV' 'I... t-"j19: U1o - =17n W- l ,10 11 ,DID 6713 K11/7 011 67
DTV'l W Ml "IMD W Nl'Im .Pl71M 114-T "On 11MM 011n1-M N 'nSim nrlil7n nlrrn
,:I n JTM1 t3XD II MM 1 t3" 1 TV IN 17,111 ... t0192 Em3i1- P "?i*
.a"139 VTnN NK1 (K
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
69 ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT [691
.306-290 ,( "6-wri)) -T r'%t pn ,"'xl}Pt2 l2lrt"' ?l2 " 13 t ,0=1? '1 rjV -1 Vi 7s
.n ,1 Mip1 " b"V 76
.1-iznn i"- nv (Oin ,w ii 7816now = It ,1141M 77
7 ,'91?01n 137P ,1"2Z1 Til1 r .f1r T ~T1OI M T? 7W 1?Z1 1 ,1 ,2 T 17V78
n1E2i 't ~3Ir 1MW1 unt Inx? 1 ' (930 MM ?W03117M ?-") HIMW 1 3 1" : 0-1
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
70 ALTMANN [70]
)T3 1'8,I nm r '1 r ln -10f
11'7 so 6121it l NXli17 -' 'i
',1 Wit 13YI, ' In 11lVSI
triontim) tm,* m fnirr w
1mmini 11r7ip riv @11v l1 ,iis7. a908 ,3 83, 1"216 {W1;TL'?-n N -#l ft 1'13y 1 3 14y
1139~3 NW 01 9l'ltN'; ;'1; ;13900~ TESTS31 VB~ DN1 In01111 Ki11$ 0 11211
riv l arxnl [149 Ir m 145 ii n,,nv? 1n67 [rzttr 141m twin v 1 5o I' nv
011=72 itm t11 17t2 nnqn 51ro 111 yut 8vivil tati m 1ni- vli19 w 0Ir
$N liy 3"099 a hIY;sr 00% t ?Int8 11MW n 311 nl 08 3" 0~t 11 l'~wED15
,rrr if D 1 mi 7triro 2 p Tirm T 1 "xtmw rirym pvw'n n1in*
1'113Nlt ~f tlSI1;I~lr~nl ''1.1 6 n11?2 1 61 1t 1 " m1in ktynw ju m'7
II X 1 ['710 E 3 149 111 lo0n1 145 IIua= ri3nm [n?3tDb) 141 111n3p i [NU 111 rir ml
X 11122 [1IIN 152 II N1 kXStn [InV17 151 11 1 V'02= [1IMr-i 150 111 ?p [ [tvz
.1 = 07
.= ,Jt2 l l"Il 79
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[71] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 71
.T132 fin
.23-22 'I1Y ,n IT ,Y0 (NY 'Z) W 12 M "IN1 '1P1. '" D"MI, ' 12 3 ("M
K11I3 $"I) 19v iv0 1 j2z'1 .. (K p 11 ,N'lW)?.2'9n ,-" TK1?ZIZ
1'8 fl0V I) " 11 -K11
9- 121
KD 1" 2T n 87
."}811U DnN MI-MV i 13 2 NW (1lI1t28
,('lti3 ' nNV I) 7M 1T .1I7 ;VN" Ms }1 0 -Dtt1 ;3 ,MS 21 A i' DnMTp 89(
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
72 ALTMANN [72]
.'131 nimDW'3 nip vNi'90 Ni'331 utiNfr xe ti'331 01m W2v tDv
t"Y T319Y N3)3~ NW 3";lff phi 009 1''NWt 59"71 11M~w Hran Dbit i
.Ainvl fivyl 1173mv ',-,I'n3 vblth 1311141-1 3 linl'on t Di P~llwm~n fiNNv i"1
,DW ,mv90% vlJu u .0l tN ,r-1v mn innx v irm 112'* tl M2173 -17 I-'I.uV no1l
.mim9 '-1n n illNm; wr113Dn tonriv M "'n lW W1" N'3l N'7X3WW ,54 '`2
%wo ?? -rium 'nm1Nw1 1-1mi m1nitur trrlrnn :.0 ,t= -T ,n1-7mr .1i )%Vjn?
,?IV Ipi n nn zlsim ; n*pn 1* mm-Inm ;.v% mnimn ... (v" ,11 ninw) 1"ID
,1212 N?31rllr; TZ MR ,Kbv 'n H? Zlnll %V61172 6r1ol -...1"M7 73 B TiK "DI D
M'M'j??3 'In" t31V ,'fIMD1 ;InDV "UlptW -,o ma 'C31min tri-nm .= ,ml I-r ,Ttt Nwn
IP412 '?ntV In773 In'71W n"M 'M HIM il 4D 3 M-'1-Ifblt18 " 9 2M?'T2
I0 ,6 11%V4 94
.(H ,fs witbDm ,?"T) =' ,17 ,tvlowrw1; 1 rl1b 8 -,?-- it D-17 "y 95
:44-43 ,(1"-n-i tm Vw11 ,tw rrv mirri) irln n ,W1rm M n 2 ,mmvprYv9
r" MitWN mi 321o8o llbrt nit NXW tO lb }2 Mani -in 4 (p"'-1 -1H nm
...}t" l'' iltT }1981' I''St I'*St fl N~p t'102 I'J n \si}*70131~18 1 WW
,773ln 74734 -1n11- 7 Si 74211742 11 773m .m'1m1 " 73009 71mill mn-li 79137 mn
, 711n999 ) .173 7110 ?V p-,?1n mr73"-= ulon 00%0 "b Mu1 l 101 miDil 97
101" '`1? M1111 '11 'M SM (20 -18'73 ,72tp7? "'I ;51-48 ,41% V10 ,Tllti W
')j _?Ti 8 M l'73 Y"I V-1 JIM 23.11 J7 "- 4* 7 17" '1 nAv n-ilm-" own x'n
.(19 ' -,72V tpi tv ,p 12tr"$ iv
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[73] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 73
t.11flK fll n K v'vivW 0 r1 1zN ?ivK 2033 ninrn
k'1 009 K1 'I 1ln 1'r J fltn 'lTflH $11n itW 19'1 $1f *D' 1K19 r3wi 1nflN 5
;3'11 VB 0~ nltsat ulrt 113D'~ inN n0181108 0221001 i~rl'SWE tlS9K '3 09013$1
."hnn 800@3~ $1900 (81'DO $"1)
.K ,j TI ,C 6
. 2 , =2 :) 9 7
DB InN ,012 "I7 Jn2 1 11 f1 17 ltI K VD3 tVT 11 :1 ,flZ T1 ,Pt2 8
pll nllU3;1@ 7'I303~ 11YZ NVWU tlDB~'p 0 nWC9 1 (t ,* I rV2 I 1) 1?ZZ fin
ttNl r inx,73 btNl 17 l 0 1ti r- 0 7.1m '71- A12=l i*M1N ?1 473 3" M 1 r Stl=M 3"-
;1b> tN '> D~Y'SW10 n'1WC297 Im1 831?2 1183' 133110 00%~ t*8 '1131 02N .nN831'
muzl 1101 4InnN mst riar -'8 itut rib'uN mmor2n mrai u1ti'1 1 Ik
....it$ uan nlo 11DB ll '1V" 7
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
74 ALTMANN [74]
."r'1 f 0 m iN n
.=-b ,X) 1- ,`Ijo
.}pir t'1tu01t(P~ll
1iT -nT1 7131W
7 ,impr WDN
7-nii
021 mi0"{11NI~n M T.12-
IPm"M 1 718M3 71nT 7"7 f'1
"Dn ."N-1PD "Mi ' IIM D 11M
.1n.4 nD Im 4m tNTv phiV
7n MNT-rva M?Ti n n1 08 N
,nimm ."...f1v t Pl ni vi Im
01872 WW, l(bix ~u n13tt3 tm
.18001l t]0122 1N82@t
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[75] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 75
.12 ,10 W~ 16
. , 4 $ N 18
.rnpn ~3V 19
.n ,en ur n,t 20
'?n ,' pi?n ,T "P ,p1n7-) n p100 ,T "`=N , '=pi 7 "1 ,1=2 101~ i t W 1 21
.(381-376
.215-210 MnyT ,A tjt)D -jh mlnl 22
.1 ,0 ,1 N 'i 23
,NtIDT317?
,flI'NK1 ,;0.1 Nir'1
'0 ; 00irh ,lI1V
invi
a0'l,-u;12
t mwfl1; ,T
n9 ",tD
- ; 'l',"wn
i np,'A"Wl"
,py "lt1' n1m v 26,
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
76 ALTMANN [76]
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[77] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 77
1"I "1T
rinio X.4y#
am 11m ax in 9o .Irm-9i
.1 11ftj 'I .t
l ntro l T "VV
n anvi 3yr'ij ifl Xf"l
1a CiN tr 1'11
1r iv37 70 47- ' : , 13 1 4j 1. 70
001a 4 13-11 ft Is S binm W1D "*111 awliv I 491-17t min 48atr rivin tv-tpv7%
ornit t9a . tVS t ?W 7j1?2Wj 09f1WJ tjoN?-S t iV ft2 119vniv 1?2
ftllD617 ofl 3YI I TIX~ ITTOM 13K"3t )IX-#l 7? 3 M1V2 M'4714 V311mv - 101mK
itworiv mpn ?= i33 arm litim t3'il-m sirm wri-m~t n'lwwi ml-pnion ?n invri(t-tn
.0 nt17 t31' )Vt~ll t3ti, OV-tt12 -l 662 1`2 ?"Tl "t2 4'3 n2v7 .312r 75
m"' DW 1373111,31 D31,vll ' 1146m tloll. f71 3 9# 'iYV1D 50so t3lnlt ', ll8tt N
11102 1N111N isIt 2TM OMVI...rl 17 1121wr3p Nmwmpor mmiwz ri9 n w? p'91 :a. 41
mrm m m?-T 4=1 t2 rSWymo NxN m'ri m? in 1rDw nom .4m 13 01D7O 13"'I1DI
n'4 B72i rrnp? 2m1 ... vID0T 1";N NT ti-n 11 .1XI ...113DT v An ri snnmnNW
134'1 714n -1-T T3M -T-VI...(liW) N4 nI (NM?) M'$u N M-2 1-7p NM,1' Mr3Y OM
.'*Wln TOMu=D .11
.t , fl'Si ' 42
. C, 3 '07iln43
.H , Int 1, 61t V?t 'I 44
,tj31WrES I1DSIDS t3Vj Vb11 lo9 ll t 11 Cr 'SWI 13uDW7 V- toDID7 jjj:WNT :-H 45
171iv "Mol "1117301M 167,1tvImn InIN '=(9 1 -MSi*D 9-VID tPIP TS 2 ?V 7M11
1"n mINnt ,tlkT 1;*m irm mv 7viTN blt # x lnv i 7 1i im rv -131t W11 ?1Ibttv r-19173
flN 'bwt Nt 6 m1iK pnm ' 'n .-.i7f '71 KV1.i 0232@ D "vN w " iir'
nvz 7'4I 11ir mn in ... nipn p 1v* 1 ilNK NK fNl :N ,Km N-n7 x = 46
.... 4W-Tm 7l 7Nn in1n11
(38-MIZ-1,64-63 `23V -Ipimrm P Prm-T mvm11mT N -YN T,i rviobn"1 47
-TS; IM1 41 T1481- :=inn ow f.r10, D ,o in (j7-.) 1-mitr 49invo #:01.11? 112 $171m
( ,Tp j?"7) 1,Td P"r ,K'V1 ImH .NK nWK1 M T "T z pln- 13r1117 74 "rl n ?
....mn'Win ','T 1-172m" Dm 7 1M.1 .9T 71M.1-TW3 : 0.In
.NK1tn ) :'"T1 48
J.T ,vmv 1 .13m , 7'1122 721M1 7""j; tO'iW1jV 1W3 n tVbl nlib;1J t3'9j'7 S n74-14' ?JV 49
.(Av KM11 NKV)) D ,-1 7"2; K M p"P nrinD '0lit MN-) ."-'1V N1" -"1,7 , ,'7
.m ,1 450
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
78 ALTMANN [78]
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[79] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 79
.AIMM ll;rT;rI::M W :0 12"1MV '172D 131r ',r , ;r'''Of
.-',13I 11711013 4N1 1"- 011' ' lr t '1 t', :"'rV W rr W l N t " (1 ,I7V
S1 K v [N17 10 9t 1 34m im " tan ['in;'1=": t108I Ilo " y n'- [ iu i ftI i"
61 0912t rp, n noyi tru nri 1m urn01 rPiwt aN 0tr 0111 im, to T 'in mri99
t1r31 l inn,'"Tt 3"D9 trnn W nnwan rl= in - 1 wx 11 vl XIti n it '9 100
t3'h1SX; 188' TR '3 N'l~~ni Div3W Wht 11 SWNK 11312 090a~ nD'Wi3 N
rqN 1 ipnm-1 1"1(nn Inni 18311-411 nal~pn 741m D 91 ni'inn1i
63 (1o-r-mr tr -,zvnni -1y) '1i1 t;?nn 7,imi1 62 :0f N rim1a}l 11p3n pioDn
-TW13 i* 13 111mD in-ij-pnai =Tt3 ninwri ?zv -3on trau *NWv, m? tN "D 70im 105
Plftr Frnm n"-n ?m ninilrin ninvan r ?zv I-#= I vis nnwin 4.nvi~tD
M1-0 170131 (C";-W? a-f pWi tIT IW 11 I 1W) D018'I1T '710 X1VII M111W
13VI--t2 'X3V Mn.1 X03 N "t? m311D 7-WN "D 7p27,1 .013= MIXW ion t101
. 11 X 1317H 1 13-1?3 109 111 N R.W I1M - 11M-112 108 111 . Y1? 3X [I?1b 107 11 1 2 X
PO31D IN-Div 11 0IM 9P '313111 I*3n "*-n rv9v - iraD WSw1 m-riD V-4 V 62
102"M Hurl1117 n110 I 11101 (1 ,ri nni) ='lnl rrwil rnsmn l nr 1m1iM 63100 ;vTW
NnoD Nill 321"1 21 olwy nn T1 1 0l1 1nvzlp M V-10-17 '1o 1-,2n (K ,-) l'ifpz
132'1Kl 1VKWNl v fl f nZ1n1i 'T0h11 llim01 '01 W 0"Tnlvzfi 110 K11v 1 ;0' 137t10I
HD1K 61102110HI Ki 111 0flfl7 ,712121pD il m21 fll nl 1?13 TN2l .t"bD *'-1 Iw12 'On
m1ri ,-1*m nin= nb ."-rrntr zr?-?vwr .?Nmvii rinnn 1* nip -lrv$i -ivn
f i0 ' m = '1 i ,n - = ,N n1 ,r -r1iD , "wVf 0'V1Vr ,f00 'b mo iVlr b m I1'
nl '4 t1?MMnN M17 (1 ,T f100i) - 1M14 7 lNK iNisK r1im *4s" : Yrn'K l'lm-
?m 117nn wnn in-21 11v1 1uvw I(1nn rm-pm -is= mo-im sin 7r1"n -vrlDWmwl
N'K 0'' 17073 171121 1l1 - 12- iM M? -12-1 T0I 0M 1M OV lIfI 10101 MS 173 0KpX1?
rlKulo" 0 112i I '7141 Knl f fly 1lK Z0p 017i r K lnllm l ' n 0l0l KlW2 0 lz2
T'IDY ~I 31i9 12 P99220 JW 18Db 03702 '001 190@ 'ti~ '~bN TD WN W 193 NW2
.17M-p' NH MD 1 90' nn9l wWM ?n (m ,mt) IMt "IV 7471 ;.1 ,t-i ninv) NSW
7Df * Kf 1-3I V 117 i7 mil 17311V 71: '-1 0 .1-r 7tK .1m 71'3 OIKn1 '5l2l...
nHIM MM 'H10li V M141 t Zl ?2 12? l 3M 1 M 01 lK'D l 0 lO n lI Nl 2017 071
1DID4 14317= 1 D-40- 0PM Mr'l 71 3 Vnl ' 41 'l4 bW 11- 12 74 0n IM-2 -1v MUM
TN 1N1mt.9 ItDx "N.?191171 'nW4 N1n 7*? JtSi trN m-1-pri "- I0 NmW1 inn 1i1i
D'911i2p oWrm 1 7 D~I tlwr.4-12v n 0nl N linrpmi 1nm nI-vvl 1V? in3w :mW
."-Y11
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
80 ALTMANN [80]
65,11 s1 DI nt i D n '988 64
66-, ssnl n4V*i .110 11S
038# .) av voN w b93m
DIU I*,imm i~5~N1 nra6 i
Is"fitt 1#31#DWR lvrp
.0?Y
nbD"IMI-11
99 04131MT'n%*~ t~~rl1%rS
19f % Inn'0 ;I t3n
141t I0nn ? Q~wa
1%; 67 1 j ?DSnIyft9 t6 6713.1'1 -)Sbtl ?D lia , I~
DT ?YVn
t1~~l 8009 PMT= 017 ~ 01998 ' 'I'W 10830 Ilru88 937u VMS VB 1?a ' 6 #
?Ynn ;1*m71 ip5m alrutpm t3173 5',itg1 7'317j V31ym f tmk3 tP'1 t '31'l
1=a 017=11% 711n i9itil r1rut 22170 o m9 51n 1 1mm30 nnvwl tr193 Tab
njj,7 'I?? n2 -,17#11 161317 68-oi rt % 13mvil IsM rivB 41730 ?m
V903 17'.t -,J9n 69 ll rinnrb t m pr'imirr v inn Im i'i 1 m1u1 a lw 5
1,tinto1 0mrli W38 il 1I j T?2 it, IT? I 9 vo] iD 7070
trisn bw: 1-r47 mamb -nonr* vimr In ?y .nhanb mn n abb
XJ'7 3W X610.t 13"'711n t ann 73 13'1i t in? ?It 72 9)jf*)8 9 ) 9 t igg'7f% f ;1vtn?
ttDtj 'in 75 13? rnr rnith 'w i 4zDi lit t7rin ninn 7iNiz 1n1if Kimn i
KSD3 so 7s 0009, *11 0199 WNtD SW ?3 718 0 310bn i 8a 0919r 0111 10
4ri1 wtv, w69 lln? DtN n3j3 X9n 76 W'ittn OD 9 61V2S 'i 'iny%7s tf 0 D10tf
Ii=6 inN 0711H t33N 77.ttn313 'inn 89ft p'o1 t ',173D nftnS DWK tt91 1321m no
nlvni iann*i bs-m 'iDn3 viwn? in ?vi ."i'mirin 011-3 min ftm t)"V73m 'Tmv
?x W 00 Nu -iwx m"S milmn i mito-t3 nnW vmvim ixvit prisinr
Al ,1 'fNj 64
[ 7D nribbl vil nx119100 6,1.1i t pra ? ?nwm '1 ?3ith1lt 'iV10? 17 98'1 5s
.NSW? 013; pin *b 7m ... 1"'2-12 I-1
pim in li nvn :X"D tn'-=1 Ifti mil ,91D 9x 7 YImm ,%VV nom 17m t1r113; rm
.1 , 4 ?'P -n 67
. 1 , 1 41 69
.8 ,' n91n vo70
.* ,P K bJB D"D 72
. I ,T : 'I<DW 73
.K ,lDl A J"K 74
2t ,1 21W Day 7s
. ' ,p '0 76
. j K2 M*4 77
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[81] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 81
0 1312? 9 n D nll39 ? =10b 131CI .V'l87 n 71 137
13,14111VOn' l 112 1911 0t3 13Xw 79.t13n 5116 'tg 1 jIjtjw It . I D j).tt
1inNtV 13 mmit) im 7? tS'Na1 ninvirm ?Dw =bri irrm 02*1 TI 20
Y, 11ls DTTt '0III13 113n "on moln? 72 111m? " 1 mv al$ n lf il 8so."
13g1M 11173V IM tnl 111 1 7'tII $XV' :DV t 1S 03"?VD013 Dqf~j'93?1p '31
m tron -qriSnim zy 81n,* m? minny ?itntr h i nn ri 911't '$i mm IinD
rIpr it? -4n wiIIIN V1"003 $"*li a 1 1.11 Tto3 ?2 " 1' Y," 25
&fn 7m3 1-liu ninvin ?n vTrirl m? mt 7,80 N MM 1173*M1 MIPY't N3 it 13
113 D I'in' 71V9n 82 npri rrm? vit n LC D itiv InnH ru VD3 t*D
nimo 3rinvi 1 03?DV83 t3,6 t3'48 412 $NIJV4 ?nTIlt3 1112kt7DI 1.210 M I
11nn t } 1 tllD 7nl 't84t 'Onn "iom t0wir nr3 i31 pi irrirmm1 ia9
"Ib 'Nn 1XIV t "11ftilo rl8n a" IjV I9 19 V'l 7?4W -"Ti 1ja 8s:5"t 3D 30
87 DD4'I?N ') mi trin trm r"TD ;31 inn ninrn t3agniv orn s 186msm i iftl
P't11 0"t1 2 71r in 0n'7 : ,101~w I1" ...Ku ,Kt u N" :('T i wT11' ,T"1)1 -
7=WS Wino -W21n =M? 72 M-11-71 I3M- t0 1 MM?M 4D23 MVW-bit 7V1 N1
t3 Nm 00. N/r N im in 03 11n.9m im mw3N' oN a7 1 .trv ,rt" Ti m 85
?w lv9m ;rknn W1D9 ...rnNw" :vl ,t -O N iti iS 'T'I Jc11 m ?11w N-7 -fIn
"oip'-4 nl Imllm -loo 14-IMM 1-"1 *"Sm ir 2 Ill- m ni7pru vD ?w .1nolr 1--T,7
."n1NW1111ot nWin 1"618 ... ,n11 vIm1pD v -,773 -
.(59) 1D '0 ,a rm '-o -)nil?:) 80
.XV 1 l b1t ' I" S3 ,= ,I J1 ,M111 1273-0 ' 81
.Tn ,122 rj iVN j 82
.2 ,T14 1 3tV 8s
.b ,"T t3 n 1l1 87 .U ,1* jjwjI; s8
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
82 ALTMANN [82]
.?0 3 ,i 1 I t3II 91
.2 ,n, 7l ,I . 'lnT ,T" 11 92
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[83] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 83
.H:, ,"0 1T 98
.T ,K :'I7Tn "t 1
.t' ,: :;'1 D", 2
.T3 ,~ 1"N 3
.K ,' 31'K S
.KN ,f 21W 6
.99 7
., ,,~ m1SW 8
.t ,) 21N 9
.D 12
.3 ,N~ ~D on 18-T 8a
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
84 ALTMANN [84]
mNO mmDN 2a 1 v Tm
tt1Ni vait lp irm rimn 'hi
vivit -,-,I v Ifimbr ) "D
It0l0' ' kN; i 13'ittowl DW ,11
[n.l.lw
11i 1 '7 14II32n1
1 2m 1v 1[ri1[N-O1
N K120M0 27 II MK 3111
1 nrlll [IvllM
12 MV 26 [131
- 'W"7171 IH1 1J
N 29
lSrl [1'w'21
11 II17N3 24 11
[W"i1 36 II '1M 'M'7'1P [l"WrpiN 34 II 11 i'-oM I0 [vr"10I M'? I 11 MN )11 "l N~D 33
.M , y 027 14
.: ,SW lrp15
.*1 ,N fl12K 16
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[85] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 85
.nn ,N 'Mj3 27
.X1 ,mW tr itm 28
.In ,I '0'7VZ D"D 29
*134 ,j ioltYVs 30
.NX ,tD gWWWYo' -"y 31
.1-XK '17I ,1-otyf jIK",Z ,t'JlM11-1 ?n0 '1' 213; 31N '0 32
.I ,rr ? " 0 33
.1 ,rr 1 410o1 34
.1 ,ftol l 6tYWV 36 .2' ,N 4nn as 35
ptI 0P1t#K 'i'$ 0'01 iI S7VD 1DO 1flTpfl2 3f12K jnflS '1 '92r nivr 37
KNKn110 ; t"0n n1t1K ; f1' 012'7 0K) rni,', rn1 io znu "I 4 1- lrK'17
wnzv* ,KNipm 7-t 7-o rN 0x1 omn1"-:( 0" m 1vn m NW NX-Iv UMMO Doll; M"D11
'11D "1002 ,1 n1DM "IM 011NSM b...MM ,1Dni -1.8 1-T3 TV-= 11W'8
11-10 ?NXtDr r"-limn3 31n n -i3 v ;*2 8-p m1710n 7'422 arMD a13 ,1001
711"' -IVMZ ,9"S TIDWR '17112 -16 116"11ibi tul"(417 M 11 -Y t'" ?3 ps1' 17H W
-IIN4.1 ,1172'p 71-03'7X ,NDWN 33 3N9 to 1SM ,V': "02l'Wl 'IVX 091158 0 t '4`In
-ivmDK 89 1 ,0-ID IP91 rm t1om1 ,"11' JIM 1D ,nlk'SNA 110 ,IN'tN1 M 11'
."DWm114Y nl 0vl ,041=3 tDo2 M 3311M , r"IM-2 1:)1M
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
86 ALTMANN [86]
IN 'T 91337 117* 13nn' D -at"Illit 1111 4331, 'tn "S - 1? 3 11M -
inoo". rwn, t n- ryanmalionirin ir~v -un m n ri nm u riri
nmm 1N0 1313f t -lVX -1 = *3 81W13 'in W 71M ;I T n 11t 1K1) ,21,3 IV
0#1 .1190 SWN;N~ MS NYt~ '1W 1190 DN '187 'lfit~ X1 Pb011308 IS N1; lyS
.:'; ,n A~ i D"f 38
X. , t 7"~b l 39
.il ,l SDTID 40
-,1141ri bt .I= rl=% '-,M 7,1=I t ; , =,"I,1 j)-1'"41
.019t3110 91 918@tD 3181I$ 12r "TD 31nn ' -" ')? -l Wb -112 NM 46
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[87] ETERNALITY OF PUNISHMENT 87
K'141S '? '3T 0i1K ' '3 so K'17 t18 -I1 49,iy,- ,rvZK p 9r
D'3'30 j30 7'NT 13'3'13 ;rD 173T' j3t:WNH 030 108 1
K'W1 O 31YK .2'1D p f1'N i D"N3m 11 .Dr 1 v) tv
mm ionY 11 K' NR 1 .r=R2n mrnl 1tN 0inn irm nisit
. .1 ,Kt' 2' in 53
." ,'' P9t1 so
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
88 ALTMANN [88]
."... Drrbln
fnNWWl "l# '0 .1n10 01201 .1TpnS,?,,.Z
u1 Is rN ?nr,
~ 20 lK ,inl
,l*3 'DD r)T' Nr 01V1
tt "ll' -
n11'*oD
. ,D t lt'r 8I 'o 5o
.217-203,(1958) tD ,rZltn ,"NU~MnV D"NK HW'D" ,Zl 7p'T .,. ;N ,.T4 7l-)"5o s7
.1 ,IT= I"VIVII 58
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:22:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms