Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Woman in Engineering
Adrien Kellaway
Professor Nugent
Over several decades, women have had difficulty with being able to maintain a career in
engineering as well as having the same role and respect as men do in the field. Usually, women
are often stereotyped by men in the workplace because they are seen as a distraction or less
intelligent when operating machinery or completing other complex tasks. This issue has been
primarily pushed to the side and ignored in large scales because companies and institutions dont
speak about their hiring processes publicly. This problem will be addressed through two genres
that will focus on specific examples of why women are facing these discriminations and how
they can possibly be extinguished amongst large engineering industries. Harvard Business
Reviews website, Why Do So Many Women Who Study Engineering Leave the Field, relays the
relevant struggles that most women go through on a day to day basis when working as engineers,
and a YouTube video, Where are the girls and why arent they here, alludes to how women are
purposely and unintentionally being swept away from engineering fields and why more women
The first genre, Harvard Business Reviews website, is a source that was published on
August 23, 2016 by Susan S. Silbey. The purpose of this website is to inform readers that women
are also facing predicaments of being stereotyped by men when relating to engineering work. In
addition, the intention of this site is to encourage general awareness of this topic through use of
every day examples and statistics. The second piece, TEDx Talks video Where are the girls and
why arent they here is a speech given by Dr. Jenna Carpenter to inform viewers and listeners
Running Head: Engineering
about the ongoing scarceness of women in engineering fields and how to resolve the issue
worldwide.
The proposed audience of the website is both young and old men and women of any
interest. Perhaps the reason this resource makes it open to anyone is because they are passionate
about the meaning of the site. The audience for the video resource are individuals who may take
a deeper interest into the field of engineering because Dr. Jenna Carpenter states several specific
examples on how to resolve the issue and where the issue stems from. In the website piece, the
people are drawn to the social issues that women face such as stereotypes and work ethic. In
contrast, the second genres intended audience are people from a higher educated background
because its of a more formal environment that gives a complex diagnosis of where the issue has
formed. However, both genres have similar audiences due to the arguments being cohesive with
one another.
The first genre is displayed through a website that also has ads throughout the page. The
second genre is on YouTube which displays a numerous amount of other related videos to watch
as well as advertisements. However, the second genres use of communication to explain the
issue at hand is much more convincing and thorough because of the structure and language Dr.
Jenna Carpenter uses to inform the audience. Whereas, the first genre simply uses texts to
explain the problem as much as possible. The first genre contains a large amount of words which
may take more time to read than watching the video given by the second genre which is only
twelve minutes. As previously stated, the second genre lists several videos related to the issue
which will entice the viewer to learn more about the subject and understand different
perspectives of the issue while the first genre only includes the passage created by the author on
one website.
Running Head: Engineering
The language and environment the author uses in the first genre seems more suitable to a
younger audience such as college and high school students because its presented in an informal
manner. Whereas, the second genre has a highly educated individual speaking to an audience on
Rhetorical Appeals
Both genres use rhetorical appeals, however, the implementation of how they are used
Ethos
The author of the first genre establishes its credibility by having a published piece on an
official website known as the Harvard Business Review and by stating facts about the issue by
explaining specific examples that are simple for the reader to understand. Also, the author takes
real life examples of how women are facing discrimination in the workplace quoting women who
have also had similar encounters. The second genre builds its credibility by using a platform
amongst women through a highly educated individual by the name of Dr. Jenna Carpenter. In
addition, the second genre uses YouTube to further spread this message to people around the
world.
Pathos
The website uses an emotional appeal, but only to a certain extent. The way the author
conveys the emotion is not very broad because she only gives examples on how a few women
experienced these issues and not going into great depth on the many cases women may face. In
Running Head: Engineering
the second genre, Dr. Jenna Carpenter alludes to childhood where young girls are often
discouraged to participate in math and science courses because their schools encourage boys
Logos
In both the website and YouTube video, the presenters appeal to their audiences
common sense and logic by giving examples and statistics. They both suggest that the most
common predicament that women face is stereotyping by gender. This means that women would
not be able to do the work that men do just because they are women. These presenters say
otherwise because women have the same capabilities as men and they should not be looked
down upon. Instead, women should be treated with equal respect because they offer insight that
Considering the information given by both genres, it is apparent that each genre differed
completely in the way the information was presented. The first genre offered lengthy passages
that may take the reader several minutes to finish reading resulting in the reader to be
discouraged from reading the information. On the other hand, the second genre presents its
information by way of a YouTube video which is more entertaining to the viewer because they
will not have to read passages like the first genre gives. Also, since the second genre is found on
a large platform that is used worldwide, YouTube, individuals are more likely to find this source
rather than the first genre. However, both genres present their claims in an organized manner and
Conclusion
Conclusively, both genres seemingly expressed the ideas and arguments of the issue of
women in mechanical engineering very well. Although, the second genre was more concise and
organized than the first which ultimately made it the better one to choose from. In addition, each
genre did give a fair and reasonable explanation of how women are treated differently than men
in mechanical engineering. With this stated, women in mechanical engineering should not be an
issue thats overlooked. Instead, it should be treated as a serious issue so there are no women
References
Silbey, S. S. (2016, August 23). Why do so many women who study engineering leave the field?
https://hbr.org/2016/08/why-do-so-many-women-who-study-engineering-leave-the-field
Talks, T. (2013, May 29). Engineering- Where are the girls and why arent they here? Dr. Jenna
watch?v=pw_9t82qD60