Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Shades of Grace: Origen and Gregory of Nyssa's Soteriological Exegesis of the "Black and
Beautiful" Bride in Song of Songs 1:5
Author(s): Mark S. M. Scott
Source: The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 2006), pp. 65-83
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Harvard Divinity School
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4125253
Accessed: 18-07-2017 09:08 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press, Harvard Divinity School are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The Harvard Theological Review
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Shades of Grace: Origen and
Gregory of Nyssa's Soteriological
Exegesis of the "Black and Beautiful"
Bride in Song of Songs 1:5*
Mark S. M. Scott
Harvard University
Patristic exegesis soared to sublime heights with the allegorical interpretation of the
Song of Songs.' This nuptial tale, replete with evocative imagery and multivalent
symbolism, supplied fertile ground for the mystical musings of Origen (ca. 185-254
C.E.) and Gregory of Nyssa (ca. 335-395 C.E.).2 Although its overt eroticism engen-
'I wish to express my thanks to Sarah Coakley, Nicholas Constas, and Rowan Greer for reading
earlier drafts of this essay. I would also like to thank Lucian Turcescu for encouraging me to submit
an earlier edition to an essay contest sponsored by the Canadian Society of Patristic Studies (CSPS),
for which it won first prize. I presented it at their annual conference in 2005 in London, Ontario at
a session with Charles Kannengiesser. Thanks also to the editorial staff and the anonymous reader
for HTR. Lastly, I wish to thank Peter Widdicombe, who first opened the "wardrobe" doors and
guided me through the enchanted world of Origen's theology.
'For a concise and helpful overview of patristic biblical exegesis, especially vis-A-vis Origen's
hermeneutics, see chapter 4, "The Interpretation of Scripture," in Henri Crouzel's magisterial Origen:
The Life and Thought of the First Great Theologian (trans. A. S. Worrall; San Francisco: Harper &
Row, 1989) 61-84. Excellent broad overviews can be found in the articles "Allegory" and "Inter-
pretation of the Bible" in Encyclopedia of Early Christianity (ed. Everett Ferguson; 2d ed.; New
York: Garland Publishing Co., 1997). See also the fine articles by Manlio Simonetti "Cantico dei
Cantici" and "Scrittura Sacra" in Origene. Dizionario. La cultura, il pensiero, le opere by Adele
Monaci Castagno (Roma: Citta Nuova Editrice, 2000).
2In the prologue to his translation of Origen's Homilies on the Song of Songs Jerome extols
the singular brilliance of Origen's allegorical exegesis to Pope Damasus I (366-384 c.E.): "While
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
66 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
of Solomon" ( ]M%! 'f. ,in [Dah.a6rd 'dni wa1-nda',d]; XXatvda ipt KGcti Kalr).
Both the Hebrew and Greek word for "black," ,'in't and plaX;, have negative
connotations, and the ambiguous sense of the conjunction between piXcatva and
KaQXl constitutes the grammatical crux of the hermeneutical debate.'
This essay advances two interrelated approaches to analyzing Origen and Greg-
ory's theological exegesis of Song 1:5. First, it problematizes their use of negative
symbolism for blackness in their expositions of this verse.5 Second, it proposes
that their innovative use of allegory enables them to transcend racial categories
and thus to obviate what might appear to modern readers as racist rhetoric. I will
argue that in distinct yet related ways, the exegesis of Origen and Gregory utilizes
black imagery to convey soteriological truth rather than racial stereotypes or anti-
black sentiments. They concern themselves ultimately not with race but with the
doctrine of salvation.
Origen surpassed all writers in his other books, in his Song of Songs he surpassed himself." in The
Song of Songs Commentary and Homilies (trans. R. P. Lawson: ACW 26; New York: The Newman
Press, 1956) 265. This paper will cite the pagination of Lawson's translation of the Latin original.
Lawson notes that the original Greek texts of Origen's commentary and homilies on the Songs of
Songs are no longer extant, although there are some small fragments. Rufinus translated the original
commentary into Latin. Unfortunately, he translated only three out of the ten books of the original,
as Jerome reports (2-3).
3The Song of Songs: Interpreted by Early Christian and Medieval Commentaries (ed. and trans.
Richard A. Norris, Jr.; The Church's Bible, ed. Robert Louis Wilken: Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003)
xviii. Norris comments that the Song of Songs was included late in the Hebrew Canon because of
the interpretive difficulties involved in identifying the symbolic referents of the lovers and their
attendants. From an early point in Jewish and Christian interpretation, the book was "reckoned
among the deepest and most difficult texts in the Bible."
4Michael V. Fox notes that M1:1 " '~ in is best translated "black but beautiful" rather than
"black and beautiful" which inverts the meaning. See HarperCollins Study Bible: New Revised
Standard Version (London: HarperCollins. 1993) 1002, n. 1:5. T71X means "desirable," and KahXf
means "beautiful." The usual word for "beautiful" in Hebrew is (fem.) MF", hence the Greek text
is glossing over a, perhaps exegetically undesirable, nuance here.
5For a recent in-depth study of Origen's treatment of the Song of Songs, as well as his
hermeneutical method more generally, see J. Christopher King, Origen on the Song of Songs as
the Spirit of Scripture: The Bridegroom's Perfect Marriage Song (Oxford: New York: Oxford
University Press, 2005).
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 67
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
68 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
who "despise and vilify her for her ignoble birth," in other w
Gentile Christians because of their inferior ancestry. Accordin
interpretation, the aspersion "black" refers not to skin color but
ing unenlightened by the wisdom of the patriarchs and particu
law. As with his literal exegesis, "black" (nigra) here has an unm
resonance. Blackness symbolizes for Origen a particular sort of
Although the Gentile church (ecclesia ex gentibus) cannot boast
and Mosaic enlightenment (illuminatio Movsis), it nonetheless sh
an innate capacity for divine enlightenment. As Origen writes, "B
beauty, all the same. For in me too there is that primal thing,
(imago Dei), wherein I was created; and, coming now to the Wo
received my beauty.""' Origen regards divine ancestry as more
human ancestry. Since God created all humans, regardless of ra
God, the Gentile church can reflect divine beauty through the
Gentile church may lack the ancestral pedigree and exterior signs
but close inspection shows its truly authentic and salvific illum
Later, when Origen draws further symbolic parallels between t
of Sheba, and the personified Ethiopia of Psalm 67, he charac
before its conversion, as the "black one" who "has been darke
ing great and many sins and, having been stained (infectus) wi
wickedness, has been rendered black and dark (niger et teneb
typology operates under the assumption that the blackness of t
of Sheba, and Ethiopia signify spiritual opacity. In his exeges
blackness denotes sin, wickedness, and spiritual deficiency.14
Bride only becomes beautiful when she transforms her blackn
whiteness, which denotes spiritual enlightenment. Thus, Ethio
Gentile sinners who offer "confession and repentance" to God
it is implied, become beautiful by becoming white." Origen's
intends to use categories of color symbolically, but the racial i
commentary require careful nuance and critical reflection; I sha
in the final two sections.
In his exegesis of Song 1:6, Origen continues to develop the
themes and symbolic frameworks. In this verse the Bride expre
sive, theme of later Christian exegesis (and, not least, that of Nicholas of L
commentator). Origen, however, taught that the Song could also be taken t
between the Word of God and the individual soul" (xix).
"2Origen, Song, 92.
"3Ibid., 103. Origen notes the parallel between the Bride and the queen o
his First Homily on the Song of Songs 1.6, 277-78.
'4Gay L. Byron, Symbolic Blackness and Ethnic Difference in Early Chri
York: Routledge, 2002) 74.
'5Origen, Song, 103.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 69
By uniting with Christ, the soul becomes purified from sin and gradually re-
covers its beauty: "Once she [the Bride or soul] begins to ... cleave to Him [the
Bridegroom or Christ] and suffer nothing whatever to separate her from Him, then
she will be made white and fair (dealbata et candida)."' Since spiritual blackness
occurs through neglect and sloth, one must transform it through industry, in other
words, through purification. Salvation then occurs in the movement away from
darkness into ever-brightening light: "When all her blackness has been cast away,
she will shine with the enveloping radiance of the true Light."'2 Thus, Origen's
exegesis of 1:6 reinforces the symbolic framework that he developed in his exegesis
of 1:5. Whereas his primary typological referent for the Bride in the Song of Songs
remains the Gentile church, he also identifies her with the individual soul. These
two typologies do not appear inconsistent or mutually exclusive for him, because
his allegorical approach allows him to discover multiple symbolic meanings that
need not cohere with each other. As Origen delves deeper into mysteries of the text,
his symbolism becomes increasingly multivalent and theologically complex.
'6Ibid., 107.
'7King, Origen on the Song of Songs as the Spirit of Scripture, 57.
'8Origen, Song, 108. Lawson, The Song of Songs, 331, n. 60. Lawson notes that the "Sun of
Justice" has Messianic overtones for Origen and that he explicitly identifies this "Sun" with Christ
throughout his corpus. He also mentions that the word Ethiopian (Ps 67:32, AiOioy: aiOo, 6)
means "burnt-face" (331, n. 57).
'9Ibid., 109.
20Ibid., 112.
2'Ibid., 107.
22Ibid.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
70 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
Origen treats Song 1:5 in his First Homily, and many of the the
in his commentary echo here." In this homily Origen puzzles ove
ascription of blackness and beauty to the Bride. He takes it to b
the two are antithetical: "But the question is, in what way is sh
she lacks whiteness, is she fair?""'24 Here again Origen associates
and whiteness with beauty. He presupposes the same symbolic f
constructed in his commentary. The Bride represents the Genti
from sin, and her beauty, according to Origen, results from the d
lows repentance: "She has repented of her sins, beauty is the g
bestowed; that is the reason she is hymned as beautiful.'' 5 She
then, despite her blackness, which represents the vestiges of si
lowing conversion: "She is called black, however, because she h
purged of every stain of sin, she has not yet been washed unto sa
beauty of the Gentile church consists in its conversion to Christ,
consists in the continued tinge of sin in the church. Blackness r
of sin that must be washed away through the purification of bapt
Origen, this symbolic nexus explains how the Bride can be sim
and beautiful: "Intelleximus, quomodo et nigra etformosa sit sp
For Origen, then, blackness clearly connotes a negative predic
the state of the Gentile church before conversion. Salvation, con
metaphorically express as the gradual transformation from darkn
ness (purity): "Nevertheless she does not stay dark-hued, she is
The process of purification uses blackness and whiteness as pri
true homiletic fashion, Origen then applies the black and whi
individual soul: "But if you do not likewise practice penitence, t
soul be described as black and ugly."'2 Blackness indicates the
of sin in the Gentile church and in the individual soul. as he
Since it is "a forbidding hue," it engenders ridicule and cause
as he writes, "'Look not at me, for that I am blackened.' She a
23Lawson, 16-17. Origen's two Homilies on the Song of Songs were writt
no longer extant in the original version. Jerome translated them into Latin an
addressed to Pope Damasus I. Lawson surmises that Origen probably wrote
years after his Commentar,, that is, before 244 C.E. Furthermore. he argues t
an "indispensable" but often overlooked resource for apprehending Origen'
his soteriology or "doctrine on grace." His translation of these texts into En
this oversight.
24Origen, First Homily, 1.6, 276.
2"Ibid.
26Ibid.
27Ibid.
28Ibid.
29Ibid.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 71
30Ibid, 278.
3Ibid.
32For an extensive treatment of Gregory's commentary on the Song of Songs, see Franz Diinzl's
Braut and Briiutigam: die Auslegung des Caniticum durch Gregor ion Nvssa (Beitrige zur Geschichte
der biblischen Exegese 32: Tiibingen: Mohr/Siebeck. 1993).
33Gregory of Nyssa, Commentary on the Song oqfSongs (trans. Casimir McCambley: Brookline,
Mass.: Hellenic College Press. 1987) 5-6. All references to Gregory will utilize McCambley's
pagination.
34Gregory, Commentary. 39.
35Johannes Quasten remarks on the relationship between Gregory and Origen: "The forward
concludes with high praise of Origen, whose mystical exegesis has beyond doubt had a powerful
influence on Gregory. Nevertheless. Gregory is too deep and independent a thinker to follow slav-
ishly the Alexandrian master" (Patrology [Utrecht: Spectrum Publishers, 1964-1966] 3:266).
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
72 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
36Norris, The Song of Songs, xx, 37. Gregory follows Origen's twofold application of a moral
(individual soul) and Christological or ecclesiastical (the church) reading of the Song.
37Gregorii Nysseni, In Canticum Canticoruin (ed. W. Jaeger; trans. Hermannus Langerbeck; Gregorii
Nysseni Opera, vol. 6; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1960) 59. This paper cites from this critical edition.
38Gregory, Commentary, 60.
39Ibid.
40Ibid.
41Ibid. 61.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 73
Although I have become dark through sin and have dwelt in gloom by my
deeds, the Bridegroom made me beautiful through his love, having exchanged
his very own beauty for my disgrace [Is 53:2-3: Phil 2:7]. After taking the
filth of my sins upon himself, he allowed me to share his own purity, and
filled me with his beauty.43
Gregory delineates the nature of divine love, which deigns to enter into the human
condition and assume humanity's sinfulness for its salvation. The Bride's beauty
metaphorically expresses the soul's salvation from sin, and by imitating Christ the
sinful soul grows in beauty. Gregory, like Origen, associates the soul's blackness
with its past sin: "My former life has created this dark, shadowy appearance ('t
1Ko'ttvOv Kat o0Q68 e)."44 Although the soul's past sins impinge upon its present
existence, it nevertheless remains beautiful on the grounds that it abides "loved by
righteousness."45 The traces of sin indelibly affixed to the soul do not mar its beauty,
since these traces only indicate a sign of its past life, not its present reality.
Gregory posits a theological link between Song 1:5 and Rom 5:8: "But God
proves his love for us in that while we were sinners Christ died for us." Both
God's love and humanity's sinfulness constitute the central features of both texts,
he avers. Gregory expounds Rom 5:8 using the racial categories of Song 1:5: "Al-
though we were darkened through sin, God made us bright (T0orootS^1;) and loving
through his resplendent grace."46 Here Gregory applies the duality of darkness and
light to soteriological transformation. The gloom of night (i.e., sin) has darkened
our souls, although they are "light by nature" (Xla'ctpa ar 40nytv), and stand
in need of spiritual illumination. Salvation means the process whereby the soul
becomes beautiful by internalizing Christ's resplendent grace. Gregory illustrates
the soteriological import of Song 1:5 using Paul's conversion: "Paul, the bride of
Christ, had become radiant from darkness."47 Hence, just as the Bride's blackness
transformed into beauty, so Paul, "a blasphemer, persecutor, insulter, and black in
color ( la;)," became illuminated, in effect made spiritually light/white, by Christ.
This transformation from darkness to light, in other words, from sin to salvation,
occurs in the cleansing of baptism, which symbolizes the "bath of regeneration"
42Ibid., 60.
43Ibid.
44Ibid., 61.
45Ibid.
46Ibid.
47Ibid.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
74 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
48Ibid.
49Ibid., 62.
5oIbid.
Slbid.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 75
52Ibid., 63
53Ibid.
54Ibid., 91. See also Gregorii, Canticum, 100.
55Ibid.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
76 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
56Ibid.
"5Ibid.
"8Ibid. 92. The soul functions like a mirror that reflects whatever it is exposed to, according to
Gregory. By turning away from evil the soul is able to become beautiful by reflecting the Beauti-
ful One: "So too the soul, when cleansed by the Word from vice, it receives within itself the sun's
orb and shines with this reflected light. Therefore, the Word says to his Bride: 'You have become
beautiful by approaching my light; by drawing near to me, you have attained communion with my
beauty'" (93).
59Ibid., 92.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 77
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
78 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 79
67Ibid., 107.
6"Origen, Commentar, II. 1, 92. Norris. The Song of Songs, 39. Norris translates this passage
as follows: "For in me what is most elemental and deep-seated is that which has been made after
the image of God; and now drawing near to the Word of God I have recovered my beauteous ap-
pearance."
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
80 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 81
all that belongs to the Christian belongs to Christ. The union between
exchange of attributes whereby Christ's "grace, life, and salvation"
death, and damnation," which belong to the soul, becomes Christ'
74Ibid., 60.
75Ibid., 61.
76Gregory's positive attitude toward darkness is expressly seen in his Life of Moses, where
Moses sees God in the darkness, which signifies "the unknown and unseen" (96). Darkness is the
condition for spiritual enlightenment: "What is now recounted seems somehow to be contradictory
to the first theophany, for then the Divine was beheld in light but now he is seen in darkness."
Gregory of Nyssa, The Life of Moses (trans. Abraham J. Malherbe and Everett Ferguson; New
York: Paulist Press, 1978) 95.
77Snowden, Before Color Prejudice, 107.
78Ibid.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
82 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
MARK S. M. SCOTT 83
Conclusion
When the church fathers read the Song of Songs, they perceived deep theologica
truths beneath the surface narrative. The passionate nuptial relationship detaile
in the story, often in overtly erotic terms, became in the industrious hands of the
Fathers an allegory of Christ's relationship to the soul and the church. Origen an
Gregory exemplify this hermeneutical trajectory and while some might characte
ize their homilies and commentaries on the Song of Songs as eisegesis rather tha
exegesis, their speculative flights nonetheless have captured the imagination o
generations of exegetes. By treating Origen and Gregory together in this essay I do
not mean to elide their differences. As I stated above, they have disparate symbolic
emphases. Nevertheless, their exegesis of the Song of Songs evinces remarkab
similarities. With respect to Song 1:5, they both affirm the soteriological significan
of the Bride's blackness, though with slightly different nuances. For both, the stor
manifests divine grace in symbolic shades. Once the symbolism of these shade
of grace comes into view, the potentially offensive racial aspects of the narrativ
become less problematic, though not altogether obsolete. In this way, Origen an
Gregory's soteriological exegesis of the racially charged language in this verse open
up new exegetical pathways for black theology. It also provides a new imaginativ
context for Christian theology to conceive of divine love and salvation.
This content downloaded from 193.231.35.250 on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:08:15 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms