Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
cn
Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions
2013, 5(5): 06370643
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2013.00637
Ludmila Strokova*
Institute of Natural Resources, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
*Correspondence to: Dr. Ludmila Strokova, Professor of Natural Resources Institute, National Research Tomsk Poly-
technic University, 30, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia. Tel: +7-3822-426159; E-mail: sla@tpu.ru
ABSTRACT
Construction of urban tunnels requires the control of surface subsidence to minimize any disturbance to nearby buildings
and services. Past study of surface subsidence has been limited to mainly empirical solutions based on field studies, and
very few analytical studies have been carried out. The available analytical solutions are not sufficient to include complex
ground conditions; hence, a comprehensive analytical solution coupled with numerical modeling is necessary to model the
effect of surface subsidence due to tunneling. This paper presents the results of modeling of surface settlements due to
tunneling using the finite element method. The effect of the overconsolidation ratio of soils expressed in terms of the co-
efficient of earth pressure at rest (K0) on surface subsidence due to tunneling is investigated. It is demonstrated that surface
settlements appear to be sensitive to K0 values, and for geotechnical calculations pertaining to overconsolidated sand and
clay soil, K0 values of 0.6 and 0.8, respectively, are proposed.
Keywords: surface settlement trough; coefficient of earth pressure at rest
Loading Mayne and Kulhawy (1982) K 0NC = 1 0.987 sin clay, K 0NC = 1 0.998 sin sand
OCR1 11.5o )
1 sin( crit
Bolton (1991a,b) K 0NC =
11.5o crit
1 + sin( crit 11.5o )
2 sin crit
Simpson (1981, 1992) K 0NC =
2 + sin crit
Wroth (1975) K 0 = OCR K 0NC (OCR 1) , where = Poissons ratio
1
Brooker and Ireland (1965) K 0 = K 0NC (OCR)n , n = f(1/Ip), n 0.4 0.05
K 0 = (1 sin(1.2 )) (OCR)sin(1.2 )
Schmidt (1966)
Unloading K OCR
OCR>1
K 0 = , where Ka = the Rankine active earth pressure coeffi-
Prska (1973) 1 K a (1 OCR)
1 sin
cient, K =
1 + sin
Meyerhof (1976) K 0 = K 0NC (OCR) , = 0.5
Mayne and Kulhawy (1982) K 0 = (1 sin ) (OCR)sin
OCR 3
Mayne and Kulhawy (1982) K 0 = (1 sin ) + 1 OCR
(1 sin )
OCRmax 4 OCRmax
Shohet (1995) K 0 = K 0OC (cu v )NC (cu v )OC , where cu = undrained cohesion
1
Reloading
1 K 0OC 1
OCR = NC
,
Sivakumar et al. (2001) 1 K 0
= slope of pre-yield undrained stress path plotted in the v h plane, from a
consolidated undrained CIU test; = ratio of slope of unload-reload line plotted in
the v ln v plane, from oedometer and isotropic compression tests.
OCR = overconsolidation ratio.
We carried out an inverse analysis using data from Based on the results of various laboratory and field
tunnel U-8 in Munich. This tunnel is approximately 14 m tests, many methods have been developed to determine
below the ground surface and its diameter is 7 m. Our the K0 of different soil types. Laboratory methods have
calculations of the settlement parameters were modeled been preferred because they are easier than field tests.
by 15-noded triangular elements in a plane-strain mesh Currently, K0 consolidation tests can be performed using
(Brinkgreve, 2004). The initial stress conditions were an oedometer or a triaxial apparatus. Because the oe-
geostatic. Inclinometer data were used as observations in dometer test has the disadvantages of unknown side fric-
the inverse analysis that calibrated the numerical model. tion as well as difficulties measuring the radial stress, the
In this study, the effects of K0 and the OCR were also triaxial apparatus more fully describes the K0 condition.
investigated. Recent advances in control techniques and equipment
There are different methods of determining the encourage the easy use of triaxial K0 consolidation tests.
preconsolidation stress, p, from laboratory oedometer
data. Casagrande (1936) developed the most commonly
used method, which we used here. The following steps
describe this construction (Figure 1):
Visually choose the point of minimum radius (or
maximum curvature) on the consolidation curve (point A).
Draw a horizontal line from point A.
Draw a line tangent to the curve at point A.
Bisect the angle made by steps and .
Extend the straight-line portion of the virgin
compression curve up to where it meets the bisector line
obtained in step . The point of intersection of these two
lines is the preconsolidation stress.
Table 2 shows the results of the estimation of OCR
from compression tests for Neogene molasse deposits. In
general, the data confirm statements of geologists about
the erosion of deposits in the Quaternary Period through Figure 1 Casagrandes method for determining
reconstruction of the alpine paleorelief in the region. preconsolidation stress
The results of determination of the coefficient of earth tension begins at the stage of unloading a sample.
pressure at rest by K0 consolidation for loam firm are In this test, the K0 by normal consolidation (OCR=1)
presented in Figures 2 and 3. The coefficient of lateral equaled 0.45; by unloading the sample, the K0 increased to
pressure is defined at the moment when vertical effective 0.9 (OCR=5). Triaxial tests have been performed to de-
640 Ludmila Strokova, 2013 / Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 5(5): 06370643
termine the model parameters and provide data for valida- lasse clay soil are given in Figures 4 and 5. K0 values that
tion of the model to predict the behavior of soil. Estimates were obtained from empirical equations and values ob-
of K0 at K0 consolidation for 20 samples of Neogene mo- tained from laboratory tests were compared (Table 3).
Figure 2 The variation of measured horizontal stress at different applied vertical stresses
Figure 3 The variation of coefficient of earth pressure at rest (K0) at different applied vertical stresses
Ludmila Strokova, 2013 / Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 5(5): 06370643 641
Table 3 Comparison between K0 values obtained from empirical equations and values obtained from laboratory tests
Using this method, we predicted surface settlements creation of the tunnel in the input program. The initial
for a tunnel to be excavated in a section of the S-Bahn stress generation (K0 procedure) was used to generate the
Stammstrecke project in the city of Munich using both initial effective stresses with the appropriate values of K0.
empirical and numerical methods. Numerical modeling The following variations of the coefficient of K0
was carried out to get back-analysis for the experimental were accepted: for sand 0.426, 0.6 and 0.8; for clay
data in order to verify the input parameters that had been 0.576, 0.8 and 1.0. Data on the vertical movements of
assumed in the planning and design phases. PLAXIS 2D each settlement model from the PLAXIS program were
finite element software (Plaxis B.V., Delft, The Nether- used to compare calculated subsidence with different K0
lands) was used to simulate the volume loss by applying a values and the measured surface subsidence. As is ap-
contraction to the shield tunnel lining (uniform "shrink- parent in Figure 6, the best coincidence with measured
age" of the lining elements in a plane normal to the tun- subsidence had a settlement curve computed with
neling centerline). This contraction was defined during the k0OC 1 (for molasse sand, 0.6; for clay, 0.8).