Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IAN BURTON
University of Toronto
1~ THE PAST DECADE geography has under- perhaps be heard from a new journal de-
gone a radical transformation of spirit and voted to history and theory.3
purpose, best described as the quantitative This paper presents a discussion of the
revolution. The consequences of the revo- general characteristics of the quantitative
lution have yet to be worked out and are movement; describes in somewhat greater
likely to involve the mathematization of detail the coming of the quantitative revo-
much of our discipline, with an attendant lution to geography; and attempts an as-
emphasis on the construction and testing sessment of the value of quantitative
of theoretical models. Although the future techniques in the development of theory.
changes will far outrun the initial expecta- Some scholars have chosen to regard the
tions of the revolutionaries, the revolution revolution in terms of a qualitative-quanti-
itself is now over. It has come largely as tative dichotomy. It does not help to cast
the result of the impact of work by non- the debate in this form. For what is philo-
geographers upon geography, a process sophically distinctive about contemporary
shared by many other disciplines where science is its disinterest in dubious dichoto-
an established order has been overthrown mies or disabling dilemmas,4 which fasci-
by a rapid conversion to a mathematical nate and ensnare the mind because they
approach. give the illusion of coming close to the
Geographers may look with the wisdom essential nature of things. 0. H. K. Spate,
of hindsight on a recent statement by in his paper on Quantity and Quality in
Douglas C. North who points out that in Geography, goes so far as to cry down
the field of economic history a revolution with dichotomies,6 but fails to heed his
is taking place. . . . It is being initiated by own advice and apply it to the title of his
a new generation of economic historians paper. Furthermore, to specify the presence
who are both skeptical of traditional inter- or absence of an attribute or quality is
pretations of U.S.economic history, and merely to begin the process of measure-
convinced that a new economic history ment at its lowest level on a nominal scale.
must be firmly grounded in sound statis- Viewed in this manner, observations of
tical data.2 Norths paper has a familiar qualitative differences are but the prelude
ring in geographical ears, but is not prima- to measurements of a higher order on
rily concerned with where the revolution ordinal, interval, or ratio scales.
is likely to lead. If the example of other The quantity-quality dichotomy has also
social sciences is any criterion, it will lead been allowed to embrace and perhaps con-
to a more mathematical, not solely statis- ceal a number of related but distinct ques-
tical, economic history. tions. These include measurement by instru-
The movement which led to the revolu- ments versus direct sense-data; rational
tion in geography was begun by physicists analysis versus intuitive perception; cold
and mathematicians, and has expanded to and barren scientific constructs versus the
transform first the physical and then the rich variety of daily sense-experience; con-
biological sciences. It is now strongly re- tinuously varying phenomena versus dis-
presented in most of the social sciences crete cases, nomothetic versus ideographic,
including economics, psychology, and and the like.
sociology. The movement is not yet The desire to avoid this confusion rein-
strongly represented in anthropology or forces my inclination to side-step the
political science, and has scarcely been felt quality-quantity issue, and to view the
in history, although early rumblings may movement toward quantification as a part
151
CANADIAN VII, 4, 1963
GEOGRAPHER,
152 THE CANADIAN GEOGRAPHER
of the general spread and growth of scienti- on climatic change, and Hagerstrands sim-
fic analysis into a world formerly domi- ulation of diffusions offers a most prom-
nated by a concern with the exceptional ising vista for future research. As Bro-
and unique. nowski notes, statistics is the method to
. .
which modern science is moving. . This
QUANTIFICATION AS INDETERMINISM is the revolutionary thought in modern
science. It replaces the concept of inevit-
Geography has long been a following able effect by that of probable trend.e
rather than a leading discipline. The It is more accurate, therefore, to refer to
main currents of thought have had their some of the later examples of quantifica-
origins in other fields. The mechanistic ap- tion in geography as indeterministic. With
proach of much nineteenth-century science Jerzy Neyman, One may hazard the as-
was represented to some extent among the sertion that every serious contemporary
environmental determinists from Ratzel (if study is a study of the chance mechanism
he was a determinist) to Semple, Hunting- behind some phenomena. The statistical
ton, and G f i t h Taylor. They were pre- and probabilistic tool in such studies is the
occupied by the notion of cause and effect, theory of stochastic processes, now involv-
and were constantly seeking laws. A ing many unsolved problems.1
similar mechanistic flavour is present in Of great significance in the development
much of the recent work by the quanti- of laws in the social sciences is the scale of
fiers. It is as if geography is re-emerging analysis. As Emrys Jones explains, The
after the lapse into ideography which fol- lack of stringency lies in the finite numbers
lowed the retreat from environmental dealt with in the social sciences as opposed
determinism. The quantitative revolution to the infinite numbers dealt with in the
is taking us back much closer to environ- physical sciences. At this latter extreme,
mental determinism. It is surely not co- statistical regularity is such that it suggests
incidental that the quantitative revolution extreme stringency or absolute validity;
is contemporaneous with the appearance while at the other end statistical variations
of neo-determinism in geography.6 and exceptions are much higher, and de-
It seems clear that a strong reaction to viations themselves warrant study.ll
environmental determinism has served to
delay the coming of the quantitative move- THE END OF A REVOLUTION
ment to geography, and has postponed the
establishment of a scientific basis for our Although its antecedents can be traced
discipline that the quantifiers hope to pro- far back, the quantitative revolution in
vide (and which the determinists were geography began in the late 1940s or
seeking, although for the most part did not early 1950s; it reached its culmination in
find). the period from 1957 to 1960, and is now
It is not so surprising, therefore, that over. Ackerman remarks that, Although
the quantitative revolution was resisted the simpler forms of statistical aids have
most strongly by American geographers, characterized geographic distribution ana-
for it was in the United States that the lysis in the past, the discipline is com-
reaction to environmental determinism was mencing to turn to more complex statistical
strongest. Characteristically, the source of methods-an entirely logical development.
strongest opposition is now the source of The use of explanatory models and re-
greatest support, and the United States has gression, correlation, variance and co-
achieved a very favourable balance of trade variance analysis may be expected to be
in the commodity of quantitative tech- increasingly more frequent in the field. In
niques. the need for and value of these methods
Although quantification in geography geography does not differ from other social
has been mechanistic, new techniques being sciences.1*
used and others being developed are in line Similarly, Hartshorne says that, to raise
with the contemporary trend in science in . . . thinking to the level of scientific
that they are probabilistic. The probabilis- knowing, it is necessary to establish generic
tic approach as exemplified in Currys work concepts that can be applied with the
QUANTITATIVE REVOLUTION AND THEORETICAL GEOGRAPHY 153
maximum degree of objectivity and accu- Although the quantitative revolution is
racy and to determine correlations of over, it is instructive to examine its course
phenomena with the maximum degree of because to do so tells us something about
certainty. Both purposes can best be accom- the sociology of our profession, and be-
plished if the phenomena can be fully and cause it provides a background for the
correctly described by quantitative mea- question, quantification for what? con-
surements and these can be subjected to sidered below.
statistical comparisons through the logic
of mathematics.13 THE COURSE OF THE QUANTITATIVE
Spate, although somewhat sceptical REVOLUTION IN GEOGRAPHY
about quantitative methods, concedes that
increasingly young geographers will feel Although the origins of the revolution
that they are not properly equipped with- lie in the fields of mathematics and physics,
out some statistical ~ O U S , and ~ ~adds the direct invasion came from closer to
parenthetically that he is relieved not to be home. A list of the more important ante-
a young geographer. cedents, having a direct or indirect impact
A n intellectual revolution is over when on geography, would include Von Neuman
accepted ideas have been overthrown or (a mathematician) and Morgenstern (an
have been modified to include new ideas. economist) for their Theory of Games and
A n intellectual revolution is over when the Economic Behavior,l6 first published in
revolutionary ideas themselves become a 1944; Norbert Wiener, whose 1948 volume
part of the conventional wisdom. When on cybernetics17 emphasized the necessity
Ackerman, Hartshorne, and Spate are in of crossing academic boundaries; and Zipf,
substantial agreement about something, who published Human Behavior and the
then we are talking about the conventional Principle of Least EflortlB in 1949.
wisdom. Hence, my belief that the quanti- Geographers began to look for quantita-
tative revolution is over and has been tive techniques that could be applied to
for some time. Further evidence may be their problems, and some non-geographers
found in the rate at which schools of began to bring new methods to bear on
geography in North America are adding old geographic questions. One example is
courses in quantitative methods to their physicist J. Q. Stewarts paper, Empirical
requirements for graduate degrees. Mathematical Rules Concerning the Dis-
Many would concur with Mackays com- tribution and Equilibrium of Population,
ment that the marginal return on arguing published in the Geographical Reviewlo as
for the need of quantitative methods is now early as 1947.
virtually ni1.15 This does not deny that Stewart has been a leader in the develop-
many ramifications of the revolution re- ment of social physics, and the declaration
main to be worked out. Nor does it mean of interdependence signed by a group of
that the ramifications will be painless. It physical and social scientists at the Prince-
is not easy to agree with Spates argument ton conference in 1949 is a landmark in
that the need for statistical nous applies the growth of the application of mathema-
only to young geographers. Is the field to tics to the social sciences.20 That econ-
progress only as rapidly as the turnover omists were eneaging in methodological
in generations? The impact of cybernation debate at this time, in a way that geo-
is aYready creatine unemployment at the graphers were to do five years later, is
white collar level. Its impact on the mana- evidenced by the Vining and Koopmans
gerial and professional strata is Iikelv to controversv in the Review of Economics
mean more work, not less. It is no flight and Statistics for 1949.21
of fancv to foresee the day when geogra- The impact of quantification began to be
phers. if they are to remain abreast of felt in geoeraohv almost immediately. It
developments, must re-learn their craft was initiated bv a number of statements
anew every decade. Nor is it difficult to see calline for quantification. Such calls had
that the present generation of quantifiers hesn issued earlier. For example, in 1936
may rapidly be replaced by younger men John Kerr Rose, in his paper on corn
more thoroughly versed in mathematics. yields and climate, argued that The
154 LE GBOGRAPHE CANADIEN
4. From the editors introduction, LERNER, 17. WIENER, NORBERT: Cybernetics. New
DANIEL(ed.) : Quality and Quantity. York, John Wiley and Sons, 1948.
New York, The Free Press, 1961, p. 18. ZIPF, G . K.: Human Behavior and the
22. Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge,
5 . SPATE,0. H. K.: Quantity and Quality in Addison-Wesley Press, 1949.
Geography. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog., 19. STEWART,J. Q.: Empirical Mathematical
50, 1960, 377-94. Rules Concerning the Distribution and
6. See, for example, SPATE: Toynbee and Equilibrium of Population. Geog. Rev.,
Huntington: A Study in Determinism. 37, 1947, 461-85.
Geog. J., 118, 1952; also SPATE: The 20. -The Development of Social Phy-
Compass of Geography. Canberra, sics. A m . I . Physics, 18, 1950, 239-53.
1953, pp. 14-15. There are signs of 2 1. VINING,RUTLEDOE: Methodological Issues
at least a neodeterminism, more subtle in Quantitative Economics. Rev. Econ.
than the old, less inclined to think of rind Star., 31, 1949, 77-86. See also
environment as exercising an almost T. C. Koopmans reply and Vinings
dictatorial power over human societies, rejoinder, pp. 86-94.
but convinced that it is far more in- 22. ROSE, J. K.: Corn Yield and Climate in
fluential than the current view admits; the Corn Belt. Geog. Rev., 26, 1936,
and with this trend I would identify 88-102. For a much earlier paper on
myself. Quoted in JONES,EMRYS: a similar topic, see HOOKER,R. H..
Cause and Effect in Human Geography. Correlation of the Weather and Crops.
Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog., 46, 1956, 369- 1. Royal Stat. SOC., 70, 1907, 1-51.
77 (see p. 370). See also MARTIN,A. 23. STRAHLER,A. N.: Davis Concepts of
F.: The Necessity for Determinism. Slope Development Viewed in the
Trans. and Papers, Inst. Brit. Geog., Light of Recent Quantitative Investiga-
17, 1951, 1 - 1 1 . tions. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog., 40,
7. CURRY,LESLIE: Climatic Change as a 1950, 209-13.
Random Series. Ann. Assoc. Am. 24. GILBERT,G. K.: The Transportation of
Geog., 52, 1962, 21-31. Debris by Running Wafer. U.S. Geol.
8. HAGERSTRAND, TORSTEN: On Monte Carlo Surv., Prof. Paper no. 86, Washington,
Simulation of Diffusion. Unpub. paper; G.P.O., 1914.
and The Propagation of Innovation 25. STRAHLER: Davis Concepts, p. 210.
Waves. Lund Stud. in Geog., B, 4, 26. Strahler notes that important work was
1952, Dept. of Geog., Royal Univ. initiated in the Soil Conservation Ser-
of Lund. vice in the middle and late 1930s. In
9. BRONOWSKI, J.: The Common Sense of addition, in 1945 there is R. E. Hor-
Science. New York, Random House, tons classical paper on quantitative
1959. morphology, Erosional Development of
10. NEYMAN,J.: Indeterminism in Science Streams and their Drainage Basins:
and New Demands on Statisticians. Hydrophysical Approach to Quanti-
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 55, 1960, 625-39. tative Morphology. Bull. Geol. SOC.
1 1 . JONES: Cause and Effect in Human Ge- Am., 56, 1945, 275-370.
ography, p. 373. 27. See QUAM, Lours 0.: Remarks on
12. ACKERMAN, EDWARDA.: Geography as Strahlers paper. Ann. Assoc. Am.
a Fundamental Research Discipline. Geog., 40, 1950, 213.
Univ. of Chicago, Dept. of Geog., 28. WOOLDRIDGE, S. W., and MORGAN, R. S.:
Research paper no. 53, 1958, p. 11. An Outline of Geomorphology.
13. HARTSHORNE, RICHARD: Perspective on London, Longmans, Green, and Co.,
the Nature of Geography. Pub. for 1959. The quotation is from the preface
Assoc. Am. Geog., Chicago, Rand to the 2nd ed., p. v.
McNally and Co., 1959, p. 161. (Mono- 29. Kmo, LESTER:Morphology of the Earth.
graph Ser. of Assoc. Am. Geog. no. 1.) Edinburgh and London, Oliver and
14. SPATE: Quantity and Quality, p. 386. Boyd Ltd., 1962, p. 231.
Spate makes a similar statement in 30. See, for example, CHORLEY,R. J.: Climate
Lord Kelvin Rides Again. Guest edi- and Morphometry. J. Geol., 65, 1957,
torial, Econ. Geog., 36, 1960, pre- 628-38.
ceding p. 95. 31. See, for example, DURY,G. H.: Contribu-
15. Personal communication, March 30, 1963. tion to a General Theory of Meander-
16. VON NEUMAN,JOHN,and MORGENSTERN, ing Valleys. Am. J. Sci., 252, 1954, 193-
OSKAR:Theory of Games and Econo- 224; also Tests of a General Theory
mic Behavior. Princeton, Princeton of Misfit Streams. Trans. and Papers,
Univ. Press, 1944. Inst. Brit. Geog., 25, 1958, 105-118;
QUANTITATIVE REVOLUTION A N D THEORETICAL GEOGRAPHY 161
and Misfit Streams: Problems in Inter- gians: A Fable for the lnstruction of
pretation, Discharge and Distribution. Young Geographers. Ann. Assoc. A m .
Geog. Rev., 50, 1960, 219-42. Ceog., 50, 1960, 297-99.
32. MACKAY: Pingos of the Pleistocene 47. ZOBLER,L.: Decision Making in Re-
Mackenzie Delta Area. Geog. Bull., no. gional construction. Ann. Assoc. Am.
18, 1962, 21-63; and The Mackenzie Geog., 48, 1958, 140-48.
Delta Area, N.W.T. Dept. of Mines 4X. MACKAY, J. Ross: Chi-square as a Tool
& Tech. Surveys, Geog. Branch, Mem. for Regional Studies. Ann. Assoc. Am.
no. 8, Ottawa, 1963. Geog., 48, 1958, 164. See also ZOBLER:
33. See, for example, WOLMAN,M. G.: The The Distinction between Relative and
Natural Channel of Brandywine Creek, Absolute Frequencies in Using Chi-
Pa. U.S. Geol. Sur., Prof. Paper no. Square for Regional Analysis. Ibid.,
271, Washington, G.P.O., 1955. 456-57; and MACKAYand BERRY:
34. Much of the work of C. W. Thornthwaite Comments on the Use of Chi-square.
and J. R. Mather has appeared in the Ibid., 49, 1959, 89.
Thornthwaite Assoc. Laboratory of 49. ROBINSON,ARTHURH.: On Perks and
Climatology, Publications in Climato- Pokes. Guest editorial, Econ. Geog.,
logy, Centerton, N.J. 37, 1961, 181-83.
35. See, for example, HARE,F. K.: Dynamic 50. LUCKERMANN, F.: Toward a More Ge-
and Synoptic Climatology. Ann. Assoc. ographic Economic Geography. Prof.
Am. Geog., 45, 1955, 152-62; also The Geog., 10, 1958, 2-10.
Westerlies. Geog. Rev., 50, 1960, 345- 5 I. BERRY: Further Comments Concerning
67. Geographic and Economic Econo-
36. See, for example, HOXN,L. H., and BRY- mic Geography. Prof Geog., 11, 1959,
SON,R. A.: Harmonic Analysis of the 11-12, Part I.
Annual March Precipitation over the 52. STAMP,L. DUDLEY:Geographical Agenda:
United States. Ann. Assoc. A m . Geog., A Review of some Tasks Awaiting
50, 1960, 157-71. Also SABBAGH, M. Geographical Attention. Pres. address,
E., and BRYSON,R. A.: Aspects of the Trans. and Papers, Inst. Brit. Geog.,
Precipitation Climatology of Canada 23, 1957, 1-17 (see p. 2 ) .
Investigated by the Method of Har- 53. MCCARTY,HAROLD H., and SALISBURY,
monic Analysis. Ann. Assoc. Am . NEIL E.: Visual Comparison of Iso-
Geog., 52, 1962, 426-40. pleth Maps as a Means of Determining
37. A useful summary is provided by Correlations between Spatially Distri-
TATHAM, G.: Environmentalism and buted Phenomena. Univ. of Iowa,
Possibilism. In Taylor, G. (ed): Ge- Dept. of Geog., Pub. No. 3, 1961.
ography in the Twentieth Century. 54. MAXWELL,A. E. : Analyzing Qualitative
New York, 1933, 128-62. Data. London, Methuen and Co., 1961.
38. GARRISON,William L.: Some Confusing 55. SHAEFFER,FREDK.: Exceptionalism in
Aspects of Common Measurements. Geography: A Methodological Ex-
Prof. Geog., 8, 1956, 4-5. amination. Ann. Assoc. A m . Geog.,
39. NELSON,H. J.: A Service Classification 43, 1953, 226-49.
of American Cities. Econ. Geog., 31, 56. HARTSHORNE: Perspective on the Nature
1955, 189-210. o f Geography, chap. 5 , pp. 36-47.
40. REYNOLDS, R. B.: Statistical Methods in 57. SHEAFFER,J. R.: Flood-to-Peak Interval.
Geographical Research. Geog. Rev., In White, G. F. (ed.) : Papers on Flood
46, 1956, 129-32. Problems. Univ. of Chicago, Dept. of
4I. GARRISON:Applicability of Statistical Geog., Research Paper no. 70, 1961,
Inference to Geographical Research. pp. 95-113. Also BURTON,I.: Types
Geog. Rev., 46, 1956, 427-29. of Agricultural Occupance of Flood
42. SPATE:Lord Kelvin Rides Again. Plains in the United States. Univ. of
43. BERRY,B. J. L.: The Quantitative Bogey- Chicago, Dept. of Geog., Research
Man. Guest editorial, Econ. Geog., 36, Paper no. 75, 1962, represents a similar
1960, preceding p. 283. attempt to classify flood plains on the
44. DACEY,M. F.: The Spacing of River basis of characteristics significant for
Towns. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog., 50, agricultural occupance.
1960, 59-61. 58. BRAITHWAITE, R. B.: Scientific Explana-
45. BURGHARDT, A. F.: The Location of River tion. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ.
Towns in the Central Lowland of the Press, 1955.
United States. Ann. Assoc. A m . Geog., 59. ROBINSON, ARTHUR H., LINDBERG, JAMES
49, 1959, 305-23. B., and BRINKMAN, LEONARDW.: A
46. PORTER,P. W.:Earnest and the Orepha- Correlation and Regression Analysis
162 L E GEOGHAPHE C A N A D ~ E N