Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
S. Godavarti; M. V. Karwe*
Department of Food Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, P.O. Box 231, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0231, USA
The distribution of specific mechanical energy means of transforming relatively low moisture in-
(SME) dissipated inside a co-rotating, self-wiping, gredients into intermediate or finished products.1
twin-screw extruder was estimated by conducting Ready-to-eat (RTE) breakfast cereals, pasta, snacks,
energy balances on each zone of the extruder. SME bread substitutes, and pet foods are some of the
dissipation was studied under three different steady examples of the products manufactured by extrusion.
state conditions in which the zone before the die was Energy input into the material during extrusion is
kept adiabatic or under constant cooling or under an important parameter because it relates to the
constant heating. Infrared temperature probes and physical and chemical transformations in the product.2
extended thermocouples were used to measure the In a typical extrusion operation, the two main sources
bulk temperature of the corn meal. Heat flow sensors of energy associated with enthalpy change of the
were used to measure the heat loss from the barrel extrudate are (1) convection heat transfer between the
surfaces. Total SME was calculated by measuring hot or cold barrel and the food material and (2)
torque, screw speed, and mass flow rate. Of the total viscous dissipation of the mechanical energy into heat
SME dissipated, 95 98 % was accounted for from inside the material. The rate of convected heat trans-
energy balance calculations on each zone. Estimated fer is proportional to the amount of contact area
maximum SME dissipation was found to occur in the between the barrel and the flowing material whereas
zone prior to the die for adiabatic and constant the heat generated due to viscous dissipation is
cooling situations. However, in the case of constant proportional to the volume of the material. In a
heating, energy balance measurements indicated that co-rotating twin-screw extruder, viscous dissipation of
most of the SME was dissipated in the middle zones of the mechanical energy predominates, especially at low
the extruder. The reasons for this are discussed. moisture contents, thus making the extrusion process
1997 Silsoe Research Institute highly energy efficient and cost effective.3,4 This rela-
tively high efficiency, coupled with other benefits such
as flexibility and versatility, is the reason for the rapid
growth of extrusion technology in the food industry.
1. Introduction Specific mechanical energy (SME) is the amount of
mechanical energy (work) dissipated as heat inside the
material, expressed per unit mass of the material.
Screw extrusion is generally defined as a process to
Specifically, it is the work input from the drive motor
mix, homogenize, and shape material by forcing it
into the material being extruded5 and thus provides a
through a specifically designed opening. Food extru-
good characterization of the extrusion process.
sion combines a high-temperature short-time (HTST)
SME is also an important process parameter in-
cooking process with several other unit operations,
fluencing the final product characteristics such as
such as conveying, kneading, heating, mixing, and
solubility, extrudate density, expansion index, hard-
forming, in a single unit. This versatile technology is
ness, etc.48 SME values indicate the extent of
finding increased applications in the food industry as a
molecular breakdown or degradation the material
* To whom all correspondence should be addressed. undergoes during the extrusion process. It is also one
277
0021-8634 / 97 / 080277 1 11 $25.00 / 0 / ag970172 1997 Silsoe Research Institute
278 S. GODAVARTI, M. V. KARWE
2.1 . Materials
of the important parameters used during scale-up of
extruders. Corn meal (Conolly Calhoun Conolly, Pennsauken,
SME is strongly dependent on the process condi- New Jersey, USA) was the raw material used in all
tions such as screw speed, barrel temperature, mois- experiments. The moisture content of corn meal was
ture content, feed composition, and screw configura- determined prior to each run by heating a known mass
tion. All of these affect the viscosity of the material of the sample at 1358C for 2 h in an oven.9
and the flow field inside the screw channels.4,5 Usually A K-Tron twin-screw feeder (Model T-20, K-Tron
ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ON A TWIN-SCREW EXTRUDER 279
Pressure transducer
176 mm
Zones Feed 1 2 3 4 5
878 mm
Corporation, Pitman, New Jersey, USA), was used to 3. There is a negligible effect of viscous dissipation
meter corn meal into the feed section of the extruder. at the tip of the extended thermocouple probes.
It is equipped with a hopper and a rotary agitator to 4. There is a negligible axial temperature gradient
prevent bridging of corn meal. The feeder was cali- in the barrel of a zone, for a given set tempera-
brated prior to extrusion runs to determine the set ture. The barrels are made up of carbon steel.
points for required mass flow rates of corn meal. There is a finite but unknown contact resistance
Water was injected into the feeding section immedi- between the adjacent barrel zones.
ately after the feed port using a triple action piston 5. The temperature of corn meal varies piecewise
pump with adjustable frequency and stroke (U.S. linearly along the extruder axis.
Electric Co., Milford, Connecticut, USA). Air in the
water line from the pump was purged and the water Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of a zone of the
pump calibrated before each run. Set points for feeder extruder and the various energy flow rates. Each zone
and water pump were obtained from the calibration of the extruder has electric heaters clamped on the
curves, for a given moisture content of corn meal, for barrel surface. The barrel has channels to circulate
desired process moisture content (M ) and total mass cold water. The exact path of the channels is not
flow rate (mf ). known, however it is not needed to perform an energy
balance. An energy balance carried out for unit time
on the zone gives:
2.2. Methodology for energy balance on a zone
Qh 5 Qb 1 Qa (1)
In order to estimate SME in each zone of the
extruder, an energy balance was conducted across Qb 5 Qf 1 Qw 1 Qcond (2)
each of the five zones. The following assumptions
Qf 5 Qh 2 Qw 2 Qcond 2 Qa (3)
were made in developing the energy balance
equations. Tz 2 T(z11) Tz 2 T(z 21)
Qcond 5 kb A 1 kb A (4)
1. Steady state conditions exist in the control Dz1 Dz2
volume.
2. There is negligible heat transfer to screw shafts. Qw 5 mw Cpw (Tow 2 Tiw ) (5)
280 S. GODAVARTI, M. V. KARWE
Qa
Heater Qh
Qcond Qcond
Qb
E Qf
mf , To f
mf , Ti f
Barrel
Cooling water
channels
Heater
Qw
Fig. 2 . Schematic diagram showing side y iew of a zone of an extruder and y arious energy flows
Here, Qh is the rate of heat generation by the electric From Eqns (3) and (6), Ez the rate of mechanical
heaters. A in Eqn (4) refers to the cross-sectional area energy dissipation in the zone can be calculated. SME
of the barrel through which conduction of heat to the can then be calculated, knowing the mass flow rate as
next barrel zone occurs. The value for the thermal
conductivity of the barrel material (carbon steel) was Ez
SMEz 5 (7)
provided by the manufacturer of the extruder as mf
40 W / mK. Tiw and Tow in Eqn (5) refer to the inlet and
outlet temperatures of the circulating cooling water Tif and Tof are the inlet and outlet temperatures of the
for a given zone. food material for a zone. These were obtained by
An energy balance for the food in a zone of the measuring temperatures of corn meal flowing in the
extruder results in the following equation: screw channels at five axial locations in the middle of
the zones. Temperatures of corn meal entering and
mf CpifTif 1 Qf 1 Ez 5 mf CpofTof 1 Qr1 Ql (6) leaving the zone were obtained by interpolation at the
interfaces between the zones assuming piecewise li-
Here, mf is the mass flow rate of the material, Ez
near temperature variation.
refers to the rate of viscous dissipation of the mechan-
The heat-capacity of corn meal was calculated using
ical energy in the zone, Qr refers to the rate of
the following equation10
enthalpy change for the chemical reactions and Ql
refers to the rate of evaporative losses. Both Qr and
Cp 5 1056 1 5?8(T ) 1 37?1(M ) 2 0?2234(M )2 1 6?2(P )
Ql were assumed to be negligible in this study. Ql can
be neglected when temperature of the flowing mate- (8)
rial is below the boiling point of water. Ql can also be
neglected when the pressure in the screw channels is where, Cp is the heat capacity in J / kgK, M is the %
high enough to prevent evaporation of water. In a moisture content (w.b.), T is the temperature in 8C
simplistic way, Ql can be calculated if the local and P is the % protein content by weight which was
pressure gradient and permeability of the material to assumed to be 9% for corn meal.3
water vapour at the local conditions are known. The SME dissipated was studied under three
However, this information was not available. different steady state conditions as described below.
ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ON A TWIN-SCREW EXTRUDER 281
Expanded probe
Spacer
Screw
root
Food
Barrel
thermocouple
calibration curve. The variation in heat flux values as a 2.3 .3 . Heat remoy ed by cooling water (Qw)
function of surface temperature as measured by the Thermocouples (type J) were installed in the cool-
three heat flow sensors mounted on the barrel of the ing water lines (Fig. 3 ) to measure the inlet and outlet
extruder was reported recently11 and is reproduced in temperatures of the zone. By measuring the mass flow
Fig. 4 . Correlations for the heat flux from the three rate (mw) of cooling water and temperature rise (DT )
sides were given11 as follows between the inlet and outlet, Qw was calculated using
Eqn (5). The flow rate of water was adjusted such that
Top surface:
(DT ) was at least 38C.
q 5 4?94(Ts 2 Ta )1?25 r 2 5 0?9957 (9)
Side surface: 2.3 .4. Heat loss to adjacent zones by conduction
q 5 3?77(Ts 2 Ta )) 1?26
r 5 0?9919
2
(10) (Qcond)
The temperature of each barrel zone was measured
Bottom surface: by the thermocouples located inside the extruder
q 5 4?22(Ts 2 Ta ))1?33 r 2 5 0?9987 (11) barrel as shown in Figs 1 and 3 . Assuming linear
temperature variation between the barrels, the con-
The correlations given by Eqns (9) (11) are in good duction heat loss was calculated using Eqn (4).
agreement with results reported in the literature for
natural convection heat transfer from external flat
surfaces12 where it has been shown that the surface 2.3 .5. Bulk temperature of the corn meal
heat flux q is proportional to (Ts 2 Ta )1?25. Once the An infrared temperature probe (Vanzetti Systems,
heat flux was known, the heat loss from all surfaces of Stoughton, Massachusetts, USA), and extended
a barrel zone was calculated, by multiplying the heat probes (SERP-(J)-2, Omega Engineering, Stanford,
flux value by the surface area. Connecticut, USA), were used to measure the bulk
ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ON A TWIN-SCREW EXTRUDER 283
4000
2
Food
Surface heat flux q(W/m2)
3000
3
2000
1000
0
0 50 100 150 200
Ts Ta (C)
Fig. 4 . Surface heat loss (flux) from barrel surfaces. d Top (1); h Bottom (3); n Side (2); Cury e fit
temperature of corn meal for more accurate measure- screw elements with no flights. Figure 3 shows the
ment of the extrudate temperature,11 as compared cross-section of a zone of ZSK - 30 extruder barrel
with standard flush thermocouple probes. An infrared where a spacer element is inserted and Fig. 5 shows
probe was used at the die while extended probes were the location of the spacer elements in the modified
placed at various locations along the length of the screw configuration. It was found that when the
screw by modifying the screw configuration to accom- infrared probe and the extended probe were used to
modate spacer elements. Spacer elements are special measure the bulk temperature of corn meal at the
Die
Spacer
Spacer
Mild mixing
Kneading
Kneading
Conveying
Conveying
Conveying
Conveying
Conveying
Conveying
Flush probe
Mild mixing
110 110
100 100
90 90
80 80
SME (kJ/kg)
SME (kJ/kg)
70 70
60 60
50 94 50
40 40 75
30 30 71
20 20 42
10 18 10 24 27
14 15 12
0 0
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
Fig. 8. SME distribution under adiabatic condition. Actual Fig. 10. SME distribution under constant heating condition.
barrel temperatures: zone 1 to 5: 22 , 28 , 31 , 38 , 49 (8C); Total Actual barrel temperatures: zone 1 to 5: 21 , 93 , 104 , 110 , 154
SME from local measurement: 153 kJ / kg; Total SME from (8C); Total SME from local measurement: 239 kJ / kg; Total
power measurements: 156 kJ / kg SME from power measurements: 244 kJ / kg
bars. The barrel and corn meal temperatures in each 3.2 . Constant cooling condition
zone for the three conditions are shown in Table 1
along with the SME values. Figure 9 shows the SME distribution under constant
cooling condition. The SME distribution is similar to
that of the adiabatic condition, i.e., maximum SME
3.1. Adiabatic condition dissipation occurs in zone 5. However, the total SME
dissipated, calculated from torque measurements, is
Figure 8 shows the SME distribution under adiaba- higher compared with the adiabatic condition. This is
tic condition. Here, the SME dissipated in zone 5 was expected since the corn meal is at a lower temperature
the highest. This is expected because of the restriction (see Table 1) and has more resistance to flow. Under
provided by the die to the flow of material, which this condition 95% of the total SME dissipated was
causes the screw channels to fill completely (i.e., accounted from the local energy balance calculations.
degree of fill is 1). Hence the contact area between the
material and the barrel surface, where shear drag is
exerted, is maximum. Of the total mechanical energy
dissipated, as calculated from torque measurements, 3.3 . Constant heating condition
98% was accounted for from the local energy balance
measurements. Figure 10 shows the distribution of SME under
It must be pointed out that the shear viscosity of constant heating condition. Calculated SME
corn meal containing 30% (w.b.) water, at the low distribution indicated that SME dissipation was high-
temperatures (less that 1008C) is not known. This is est in zones 2 and 3 and not in zone 5 as expected.
perhaps due the fact that corn meal does not behave This unexpected distribution of SME may be the
like fluid at low temperatures but rather behaves as a result of the energy balance procedure which is solely
compacted powdery mass. based on the temperature rise of corn meal in the
individual zones. It is speculated that because the
temperature of corn meal in zone 5 is high (close to
1508C) in comparison with all the other zones (see
110
100 Table 1), the increase in food temperature in zones 2
90 and 3 may not be owing to SME dissipation but owing
80
to water vapour migration and condensation effects.
SME (kJ/kg)
70
60 Since the pressure increases towards the die end,
50 93
40 water vapour generated in zone 5 has a tendency to
30 flow back and escape in the direction of lower
20
10 15
24
13 14 pressure and condense in earlier zones where the
0 temperature is lower than that in zone 5 and below
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
1008C. Most of the water vapour generated would
Fig. 9. SME distribution under constant cooling condition.
Actual barrel temperatures: zone 1 to 5: 23 , 30 , 34 , 40 , 32 condense in zone 2 due to the presence of mild mixing
(8C); Total SME from local measurement: 159 kJ / kg; Total elements in this zone (see Fig. 5 ). These mixing
SME from power measurements: 166 kJ / kg elements have no conveying action and become com-
286 S. GODAVARTI, M. V. KARWE
Table 1
Barrel temperature, corn meal temperature and SME values in five zones under three
steady state conditions
Adiabatic
Barrel temperature (8C) 22 28 31 38 49
Corn meal temperature (8C) 23 28 34 36 44
SME (kJ / kg) 14 18 15 12 94
Constant cooling
Barrel temperature (8C) 23 30 33 39 33
Corn meal temperature (8C) 25 30 37 38 36
SME (kJ / kg) 15 24 13 14 93
Constant heating
Barrel temperature (8C) 21 93 104 110 154
Corn meal temperature (8C) 28 83 107 110 122
SME (kJ / kg) 24 75 71 27 42
pletely filled with corn meal. The migrating water of zone 5, water vapour generated in this zone
vapour encounters this low temperature barrier of migrated and condensed in other zones increasing the
uniformly mixed corn meal and condenses, thus re- barrel and food temperatures of those zones. The high
leasing the latent heat and increasing the barrel food temperature in these earlier zones may not be
temperature. If the amount of water vapour migrating due to SME dissipation but due to water vapour
from zone 5 can be quantified, a more accurate condensation effects.
reflection of SME dissipation values can be obtained.
However, it needs knowledge of porosity distribution Acknowledgements
and permeability of corn meal to water vapour flow
which are not known. Further research on porosity This is publication no. D10544-3-96 of the New Jersey
measurements as related to extrusion processes and Agricultural Experimental Station supported by state funds
and the Center for Advanced Food Technology, (CAFT).
migration of water vapour needs to be carried out. The Center for Advanced Food Technology is a New Jersey
The total mechanical energy dissipated as obtained Commission on science and Technology Center. The authors
from torque measurements was within 98% of the sum would like to thank Professors Y. Jaluria and V. Sernas for
total obtained from energy balance conducted on their comments and suggestions.
individual zones.
References
4. Conclusions
1
Kokini J L The effect of processing history on chemical
The amount of SME dissipated in the five zones of a changes in single-screw and twin-screw extruders.
Trends in Food Science and Technology 1993, 4(10),
twin-screw extruder was determined using localized 324 329
energy measurements. An overall energy balance, 2
Tayeb J; Della Valle G Simulation of transport phenom-
involving an independent measurement of the power ena in twin-screw extruders. Food Extrusion Science
required by the extruder showed that 95 98% of the and Technology, Kokini. J., Ho. C. T., and Karwe. M.
total SME dissipated could be accounted for. Under V. (Eds), New York: Marcel Dekker, 1992
3
Frame N D The Technology of Extrusion Cooking.
adiabatic and constant cooling conditions in all zones, Glasgow: Blackie Academic & Professional, 1994
the major portion of the total SME dissipated was 4
Mercier C; Linko P; Harper J M (Eds), Extrusion
seen to occur in zone 5. However, in the case of Cooking. Minnesota: American Association of Cereal
constant heating in zone 5 which was the zone Chemists, 1989
5
immediately before the die, the energy balance Harper J M Extrusion of Foods. Vols. I and II. Boca
Raton: CRC Press, 1981
measurements indicated that maximum SME dissipa- 6
Van Lengrich B; Meuser F Determination of the viscosity
tion occurred in zones 2 and 3 of the extruder. It is of starch during its extrusion cooking with a co-rotating
speculated that owing to the high barrel temperature twin-screw extruder. Ang How Ghee, (Ed.) Trends in
ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ON A TWIN-SCREW EXTRUDER 287
Food Processing. Singapore: Singapore Institute of (AACC) Approved Methods, Volume II. Minneapolis,
Food Science and Technology, 1989 Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists,
7
Meuser F; Gimmler N A systems analytical approach to 1986
10
extrusion. Kokini J; Ho C T; Karwe M V (Eds), Food Research Accomplishment Report Center for Advanced
Extrusion Science and Technology. New York: Marcel Technology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New
Dekker, 1992 Jersey, June 1995
8 11
Meuser F; Pfaller W; Van Lengrich B Technological Karwe M V; Godavarti S Accurate measurement of
aspects regarding specific changes to the characteristic extrudate temperature and heat loss on a twin-screw
properties of extrudates by HTST extrusion cooking. extruder. Journal of Food Science, 62(2), 367 372,
C. OConnor (Ed) Extrusion Technology for the Food 1997
12
Industry. London: Elsevier, 1987 Jaluria Y Natural Convection Heat and Mass Transfer.
9
Method 44 19 American Association of Cereal Chemists New York: Pergamon, 1980