Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Some
may perceive a collaborative effort with the school librarian as an intrusion on the few precious
minutes they do have. Conversely, school librarians with no support staff independently manage
administrative duties, circulation, and patron requests with time for little else.
Solutions: A school librarian can utilize support staff and volunteers to visit teachers
during planning periods or attend grade level meetings to learn about upcoming units of study.
At its best, this practice allows a school librarian to open the door for possible collaborations as
teachers gain awareness of a school librarian's knowledge, skills, and services. At a minimum, it
affords the school librarian an opportunity to recommend resources and activities that enhance
existing classroom lessons. An alternative approach, likely to become popular with the faculty, is
the implementation of a weekly free beverage day. One local elementary school librarian sends
one corner of the media center, she provides large pots of coffee and bot water alongside small
baskets with packets of creamer, hot chocolate, and tea. On Wednesday, staff traffic in the media
center is heavy. With informal chats, the school librarian builds rapport with her colleagues,
suggesting resources and collaborative services when the conversations turn to future curricular
plans.
Barrier #2: Technology Troubleshooting DemandsConducted by LIBRARY MEDIA
CONNECTION, a February 2008 survey of 992 school media specialists revealed 65% consider
themselves "the secondary technology support person" in the building and 15% "the primary
technology person". The latter figure may be on the rise as many school districts, faced with
deep budget cuts, have downsized IT personnel. The result is an increased demand for school
librarians to troubleshoot staff technology concerns. Such demands sap time from collaborative
efforts.
Solutions: School librarians must create and maintain a balanced schedule. Collaboration
requires advance preparation and commitment. School librarians should keep appointments with
teachers and students for collaborative planning and lesson implementation while setting aside
specific blocks of time to address technology issues. To maximize efficiency, the school librarian
may keep a technology log of submitted troubleshooting requests, noting the date and time, the
teacher's name, and the nature of the concern. A log allows problems to be addressed in order of
receipt and documents frequently recurring issues. A school librarian may respond to common
troubleshooting guide. When one-on-one assistance visits to a classroom do occur, the school
librarian can use the opportunity to expand the teacher's technology skills while marketing the
librarian's expertise as an instructional partner, eager for collaborative efforts to expand student
knowledge.
Barrier #3: Narrow FocusThough well suited and eager to implement information
literacy standards, a school librarian may lack knowledge of content specific academic curricular
objectives. Such a gap impedes a school librarian's ability to align information literacy standards
with academic standards. Thus, no framework exists to provide classroom teachers with a
Solutions: A school librarian must become well acquainted with state academic
standards, especially those assigned to the represented grade levels at her school. To garner a
faculty member's collaborative support, a school librarian must "illustrate the obvious connection
between information literacy and content related objectives [and] indicate the mutual benefit of
integrating the two sets of objectives where the accomplishment of one set promotes the
fulfillment of the other" (Wolcott part.l9). One need not memorize the academic standards but
become familiar with what classroom instructors are teaching. For example, at the start of each
school year, teacher-librarian Debbie Belue requests copies of faculty members' long range
plans. From this broad list of units, she creates an easy to follow matrix including teachers'
names, months of the year, and planned topics of study. Using this matrix as a blueprint for
proposing collaborative projects, she proactively gathers unit-related materials and reflects upon
ways to combine information literacy activities with the classroom teachers' existing plans.
While a unit matrix may be impractical for a school librarian serving a vast population, such as a
large high school, the librarian could target specific academic departments each quarter, i.e.
planning collaborative lessons with selected science classes the first nine weeks, social studies
class the second nine weeks, and so forth as required by subject areas and teachers.
Barrier #4: Faculty PerceptionsEnglish teacher Angela Gess notes, "In some school
environments, the library media center is viewed as a place for students to 'waste' time reading
fiction books, and the library media specialist is merely a babysitter who provides teachers with
constructivist teachers to initiate collaboration efforts. Such teachers appreciate the school
underscored by genuine student interest in a topic, may be too tempting for others to resist
climbing on board in the future. With those educators, less open to partnerships, a school
librarian recognizes opportunities, no matter how small, to market her services to faculty and
students. For example, instead of displaying annoyance that a colleague waited until the last
minute to seek resources for an imminent lesson, capitalize on the opportunity to exercise the
"information specialist role to the hilt" by demonstrating eagerness and enthusiasm for the
challenge (Wolcott par. 18). The librarian's positive attitude may be just the key for approaching
this colleague in the future with collaborative intentions. Finally, a school librarian can change
attending grade level meetings, and volunteering on the school's improvement committee
Barrier #5: Restrictive ControlIn some schools, teachers may feel detached and
uninformed of the media program's resources and the librarian's good intentions if the school
librarian exhibits tight control of materials through restrictive circulation policies or if she
Solutions: In this scenario, a school librarian needs to revisit and reflect upon the media
program's mission. Resources sitting on a library shelf accomplish nothing but dust
accumulation! A true information professional worries less about managing the collection's
attrition, caring more for marketing every resource available to foster students' lifelong learning.
In addition, an effective school librarian actively solicits "assistance in evaluating and selecting
appropriate resources in the collection," especially those areas with noted deficiencies (Wolcott
par. 19). Collaboration is an ideal format as a school librarian may obtain formal or informal
feedback from the partnering teacher and students regarding the collection's strengths and
weaknesses. Furthermore, a school librarian may enlist vendors to display materials for purchase
consideration on tables in the media center and invite faculty members to stop by, browse the
options, and record preferences with sticky notes affixed to specific items. Not only will teachers
feel more invested in the school media program, they will appreciate the librarian for assigning
Barrier #6: Lack of Administrative SupportPrincipals and school officials may simply
lack awareness of collaboration benefits. Perhaps students have always been served in the media
center on a fixed schedule and the principal has never doubted this practice as sound pedagogy.
sound research underscoring the positive effect meaningful collaborations have on student
achievement. Few principals can dispute hard evidence in the form of increased test scores, as
noted in this paper's section on collaborative benefits for students. To maintain effective
collaborative practices, a school librarian must advocate for partial or full flexible scheduling
over fixed scheduling, presenting administrators with additional research findings to indicate
"group library media center visits [do] not demonstrate . . . a correlation" with increased test
scores (Lance 18). To this end, a school librarian needs to be realistic, recognizing that