Dear Sir/Ma’am,
Before you read any further, please understand that the following paragraphs come from a place
of intense devotion and loyalty to West Point. My experience as a cadet had a profound impact
upon who I am and upon the course of my life, and | remain forever grateful that I have the
opportunity to be a part of the Long Gray Line. I firmly believe West Point is a national treasure
and that it can and should remain a vitally important source of well trained, disciplined, highly
educated Army officers and civilian leaders. However, during my time on the West Point faculty
(2006-2009 and again from 2013-2017), I personally witnessed a series of fundamental changes
at West Point that have eroded it to the point where I question whether the institution should
even remain open. The recent coverage of 2LT Spenser Rapone—an avowed Communist and
lly highlighted t
recent tenure on the West Point faculty and my direct interactions with Rapone, his “mentors,”
swom enemy of the United States—drama disturbing trend. Given my
and with the Academy
leadership, I believe I can shed light on how someone like Rapone
could possibly graduate.
First and foremost, standards at West Point are nonexistent. They exist on paper, but nowhere
else. The senior administration at West Point i
iexplicably refuses to enforce West Point's
publicly touted high standards on cadets, and, having picked up on this, cadets refuse to enforce
standards on each other. The Superintendent refuses to enforce admissions standards or the cadet
Honor Code, the Dean refuses to enforce academic standards, and the Commandant refuses to
enforce standards of conduct and discipline. The end result is a sort of malaise that pervades the
entire institution. Nothing matters anymore. Cadets know this, and it has given rise to a level of
cadet arrogance and entitlement the likes of which West Point has never seen in its history.
Every fall, the Superintendent addresses the staff and faculty and lies. He repeatedly states that
“We are going to have winning sports teams without compromising our standards,” and everyone
in Robinson Auditorium knows he is lying because we routinely admit athletes with ACT scores
in the mid-teens across the board. I have personally taught cadets who are borderline illiterate
and cannot read simple passages from the assigned textbooks. It is disheartening when the
institution's most senior leader openly lies to his own faculty—and they all know it.The cadet honor code has become a laughingstock. Cadets know they will not be separated for
violating i
and thus they do so on a daily basis. Moreover, since they refuse to enforce standards
on each other and police their own ranks, cadets will rarely find a cadet at an honor hearing
despite overwhelming evidence that a violation has occurred. This in turn has caused the staff
and faculty to give up even reporting honor incidents. Why would a staff or faculty member
expend the massive amount of time and energy it takes to report an honor violation—including
writing multiple swom statements, giving interviews, and testifying at the honor hearing —when
they know without a doubt the cadet will not be found (or, if found, the Superintendent will not
separate the cadet)? To make matters worse, the senior leadership at West Point actively
discourages staff and faculty from reporting honor violations. I was unfortunate enough to
experience this first hand during my first tour on the faculty, when the Commandant of Cadets
called my office phone and proceeded to berate me in the most vulgar and obscene language for
over ten minutes because I had reported a cadet who lied to me and then asked if “we could just
drop it.” Of course, I was duty bound to report the cadet’s violation, and I did. During the course
of the berating I received from the Commandant, I never actually found out why he was so
angry. It seemed that he was simply irritated that the institution was having to deal with the case,
and that it was my fault it even existed. At the honor hea
ing the next day, I ended up being the
‘one on trial as my character and reputation were dragged through the mud by the cadet and her
civilian attomey while I sat on the witness stand without any assistanc
In the end, of course, the
cadet was not found (despite having at first admitted that she lied), and she eventually graduated.
Just recently a cadet openly and obviously plagiarized his History research paper, and his civilian
professor reported it. The evidence was overwhelming—there was not the slightest question of
his guilt, yet the cadet was not found, The professor, and indeed all the faculty who knew of the
‘case, were completely demoralized. This is the new norm for the cadet honor system. In faet,
there is now an addition to the honor system (the Willful Admission Process) which essentially
‘guarantees that if a cadet admits a violation, then separation is not even a possibility. In reality,
separation is not a possibility anyway because the Superintendent refuses to impose that
sanction.Academic standards are also nonexistent. I believe this trend started approximately ten years ago,
and it has continued to get worse. West Point has stated standards for academic expectations and
performance, but they are ignored. Cadets routinely fail multiple classes and they are not
separated at the end-of-semester Academic Boards. Their professors recommend “Definitely
Separate,” but those recommendations are totally disregarded. I recently taught a cadet who
failed four classes in one semester (including mine), in addition to several she had failed in
previous semesters, and she was retained at the Academy. As a result, professors have lost hope
and faith in the entire Academic Board process. It has been made clear that cadets can fail a
multitude of classes and they will not be separated. Instead, when they fail (and they do to a
staggering extent), the Dean simply throws them back into the mix and expects the faculty to
somehow drag them through the academic program until they manage to carn a passing grade.
What a betrayal this is to the faculty! Also, since they get full grade replacement if they must re-
take a course, cadets are actually incentivized to fail. They know they can re-take the course over
the summer when they have no other competing requirements, and their new grade completely
replaces the failing one. STAP (Summer Term Academie Program) is also now an accepted
summer detail assignment, so retaking a course during the summer translates into even more
summer leave for the deficient cadet.
Even the curriculum itself has suffered. The plebe American History course has been revamped
to focus completely on race and on the narrative that America is founded solely on a history of
racial oppression. Cadets derisively call it the “I Hate America Course.” Simultaneously, the
plebe International History course now focuses on gender to the exclusion of many other
important themes. On the other hand, an entire semester of military history was recently deleted
from the curriculum (at West Point!). In all courses, the bar has been lowered to the point where
itis irrelevant. Ifa cadet fails a course, the instructor is blamed, so instructors are incentivized to
pass everyone. Additionally, instead of responding to cadet failure with an insistence that cadets
rise to the challenge and meet the standard, the bar for passing the course itself is simply
lowered. This pattern is widespread and pervades every academic department.
Conduct and disciplinary standards are in perhaps the worst shape of all. Cadets are jaded,
cynical, arrogant, and entitled, They routinely talk back to and snap at their instructors (militaryand civilian alike), challenge authority, and openly refuse to follow regulations. They are
allowed to wear civilian clothes in almost any arena outside the classroom, and they flaunt that
privilege. Some arrive to class unshaven, in need of haircuts, and with uniforms that look so
ridiculously bad that, at times, I could not believe I was even looking at a West Point cadet.
However, ifa staff or faculty member attempts to correct the cadet in question, that staff/faculty
member is sure to be reprimanded for “harassing cadets.” For example, as I made my rounds
through the barracks inspecting study conditions one evening as the Academic Officer in Charge,
J encountered a cadet in a company study room. He was wearing a pair of blue jeans and nothing
else, and was covered in tattoos. He had long hair, was unshaven, and I was honestly unsure if he
was even a cadet. He looked more like a prison convict to me. When I questioned what he was
doing there, he remained seated in his chair and sneered at me that he “was authorized” because
he was a First Class cadet. I proceeded to correct him and then reported him to the chain of
‘command the next morning. Later that day I received an email from the Brigade Tactical Officer
telling me to “stay in my lane.” I know many other officers receive the same treatment when
attempting to make corrections. It is extremely discouraging when the response is invariably one
that comes to the defense of the cadet.
‘That brings me to another point: cadets’ versions of stories are always valued more highly by
senior leaders than those of commissioned officers on the staff and faculty. It is as if West
Point's senior leaders believe their job is to “protect” cadets from the staff and faculty at all
costs. This might explain why the faculty"s recommendations are ignored at the Academic
Boards, why honor violations are ignored (and commissioned officers are verbally abused for
bringing them to light), and why cadets always “win” when it comes to conduct and disciplinary
issues.
It seems that the Academy's senior leaders are intimidated by cadets. During my first tour on the
faculty (1 was a CPT at the time), I noticed that 4" class cadets were going on leave in civilian
clothes when the regulation clearly stated they were supposed to be wearing a uniform. During a
discussion about cadet standards between the BTO and the Dept. of History faculty, I asked why
plebes were going on leave in civilian clothes. His answer astonished me: “That rule is too hard
to enforce.” Yet West Point had no problem enforcing that rule on me in the mid-1990s. I foundit impossible to believe that the several hundred field grade officers stationed at West Point could
not make teenagers wear the uniform. This anecdote highlights the fact that West Point's senior
leaders lack not the ability but the motivation to enforce their will upon the Corps of Cadets.
This brings me to the case of now-2LT Spenser Rapone. It is not at all surprising that the
Academy turned a blind eye to his behavior and to his very public hatred of West Point, the
Army, and this nation. I knew at the time I wrote that sworn statement in 2015 that he would go
on to graduate. It is not so much that West Point’s leadership defends his views (Prof. Hosein
did, however); it is that West Point’s senior leaders are infected with apathy: they simply do not
want to deal with any problem, regardless of how grievous a violation of standards and/or
discipline it may be. They are so reticent to separate problematic cadets (undoubtedly due to the
“developmental model” that now exists at USMA) that someone like Rapone can easily slip
through the cracks. In other words, West Point’s leaders choose the easier wrong over the harder
right.
I could go on, but I fear that this letter would simply devolve into a screed, which is not my
intention. I will sum up by saying this: a culture of extreme permissiveness has invaded the
Mili
ary Academy, and there seems to be no end to it. Moreover, this is not unintentional; itis a
deliberate action that is being taken by the Academy’s senior leadership, though they refuse to
acknowledge or explain it. Conduet and behavior that would never be tolerated at a civilian
university is common among cadets, and it is supported and defended by the Academy's senior
Jeaders in an apparent and misguided effort to attract more applicants and cater to what they see
as the unique needs of this generation of cadets.
Our beloved Military Academy has lost its way. It is a shadow of what it once was. It used to be
a place where standards and discipline mattered, and where concepts like duty, honor, and
country were real and they meant something. Those ideas have been replaced by extreme
permissiveness, rampant dishonesty, and an inexplicable pursuit of mediocrity. Instead of
scrambling to restore West Point to what it once was, the Academy's senior leaders give cadets
more and more privileges in a seeming effort to turn the institution into a third-rate civilian
liberal arts college. Unfortunately, they have largely succeeded. The few remaining members ofthe staff and faculty who are still trying to hold the line are routinely berated, ignored, and
ultimately silenced for their unwillingness to “go along with the program.” The Academy
senior leaders simply do not want to hear their voices or their concerns. Dissent is crushed—I
was repeatedly told to keep quiet at faculty meetings, even as a LTC, because my dissent was
neither needed nor appreciated.
It breaks my heart to write this. It breaks my heart to know first-hand what West Point was
versus what it has become. This is not a “Corps has” story; it is meant to highlight a deliberate
and radical series of changes being undertaken at the highest levels of USMA’s leadership that
are detrimental to the institution, Criticizing these changes is not popular. I have already been
labeled a “traitor” by some at the Academy due to my sworn statement’s appearance in the media
circus surrounding Spenser Rapone. However, whenever I hear this, I am reminded of the Cadet
Prayer:
suffer not our hatred of hypocrisy and pretense ever to diminish.
Make us to choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong,
and never to be content with a half-truth when the whole can be won.
---that scorns to compromise with vice and injustice, and knows no
fear when truth and right are in jeopardy.”
‘West Point was once special, and it can be again, Spenser Rapone never should have been
admitted, much less graduate, but he was—and that mistake is directly attributable to the culture
of permissiveness and apathy that now exists there.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Gur
Robert M. Heffingto'
LTC, U.S. Army (Retired)
West Point Class of 1997