Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Meaghan Morrell
Dr. Wallilus
13 June 2017
Double Victory
The concept of a double victory dates back to the beginning of World War II and the
role of minority groups in the war. At the time, Germany and Japan were at war with the
rest of the world and the US became involved due to the bombing at Pearl Harbor in
Hawaii. This war was vital because it was perceived as a war against racism in Germany
because of the racial superiority that Hitler was trying to enforce in creating the supreme
camps. Due to the bombing at Pearl Harbor in the United States, a sense of fear was
fear that these groups were working in part secretly with Japanese and German forces to
win the war. This eventually led to the displacement of Japanese Americans into
internment camps from Hawaii and the rest coast, along with many Japanese who lived in
Hawaii having to rebuild Pearl Harbor and some even being drafted to fight against the
Germans (not the Japanese because they did not want them joining forces and betraying
the US in the process because of the way in which they were being treated on the home
front). According to Takaki, the concept of the double victory during this time period was
that of the US fight against Japan and winning, along with the notion of the Japanese getting
involved in the war effort to help show Americans they were good fighters and
contributors to the war effort. It was evident the war on racism had not yet been won -
Morrell 2
Captian Daniel Inouye a Japanese American soldier returned home from fighting in the war
effort in 1945 and went to get his haircut in San Francisco and was told he couldnt be
served because he was Japanese (Takaki, 350). Also, at the beginning of the war, the notion
becoming involved in the war effort to bring light to the issue of segregation in a segregated
society. Upon arrival home from the war, the early beginning of a civil rights movement
was sparked.
The idea of a double victory today according to Wallilus stems from the idea of
students and make it through completing a higher education after their Bachelors,
especially being involved in the process of societal distortions. A double victory opens up
the possibilities for graduate victories that are personally and racially significant
(Wallilus, 90).
The transferability of the notion of a double victory easily transfers to the modern
day because minority groups still battle for fair treatment in society. For example, minority
groups that live in poor areas are less likely to receive the same quality public education as
their white peers who live in more affluent areas where schools receive better funding, but
yet the US is striving to surpass other world countries to have a stronger public educational
system and turn out more intelligent people overall. However, this is impossible to achieve
unless all schools receive the quality funding they need in order to invest in our students
and our future regardless of their location. When minority and low-income students prove
this system wrong in the sense they make it to college coming from predominantly poorer
areas, they prove the concept of a double victory in progress. However, when schools
Morrell 3
take the time to invest in poorer schools and the turnout rates for students from minority
backgrounds go off to receive a higher education increase and our rankings increase among