Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
291
292 THERMODYNAMIC S T A B I L I T Y OF THIN F E R R O E L E C T R I C FILMS Vol. l l , No. 1
Ef = 47: ( T - To )P + ~ P ~ . (2)
C
F o r a c r y s t a l of infinite t h i c k n e s s the p o l a r i z -
a t i o n c h a r g e s are fully c o m p e n s a t e d and E r = 0.
The s p o n t a n e o u s p o l a r i z a t i o n is then given by
T- 2GI
~ ~/2 (12)
t o w a r d s the bulk value of 3.6/.tc/cm2 a s I i n c r e a s e s
The d e p o l a r i z a t i o n field, El, shows an i n t e r e s t i n g
d e p e n d e n c e on I. It goes to zero at I = Ic and a l s o
at l - , o ~ but has a maximum at I = l~ = 31c/2
E/ ~--P4vr]t'/2 [T -U]2XC]'/z(2}~)~'-I " (13) which is about 0.6/zm in this c a s e . T h i s b e h a v i o r
c a n be u n d e r s t o o d from e q u a t i o n (13) which s a y s
In F i g . 2 we have p l o t t e d ATo, Ps , and the that Ef ~- Ps ~ T 0 . In other words the E / c u r v e is
magnitude of E r a s a function of film t h i c k n e s s . e s s e n t i a l l y the product of the c u r v e s for Ps and
294 THERMODYNAMIC STABILITY OF THIN FERROELECTRIC FILMS Vot. 11, No. 1
ATo. Since one is increasing and the other is In conclusion it is emphasized that the
decreasing with l, one would expect a maximum
electrical conditions are significant in determining
in the product. The fact that the maximum occurs
the thermodynamic properties of thin ferroelectric
at a small value of I is due to a rapid decrease
films. Shorted electrodes do not provide exact
in P~ in this range.
charge cancellation of the depolarization field
and hence the transition temperature and polari-
The case of metallic electrodes can be
zation should be shifted to lower values than
treated with the use of F e r m i - D i r a c s t a t i s t i c s .
observed in the bulk. The effect predicted here
At the higher carrier concentration the screening
is similar to the one discussed by Ginzburg and
length is smaller and hence depolarization effects
P i t a e v s k i i 7 in connection with the A-point
are less severe. For screening lengths of approxi-
transition in superfluidity.
mately 1 A, the critical thickness will then be
only 1 per cent of the length just calculated for
the semiconducting electrode.
REFERENCES
1. DROUGARD M.E. and LANDAUER R., J. appl. Phys. 30, 1663 (1959); JANOVEC V., CZECHOSLOV.
J. Phys. 9, 468 (1959); TRIEBWASSER S., Phys. Rev. | ]8, 100 (1960); and CALLABY D.R., J. appl.
Phys. 36, 2751 (1965).
2. SHARMA B.S., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 103 (1972); MEHTA R.R., SILVERMAN B.D. and JACOBS
J.T., ibid.
3. BATRA I.P. and SILVERMAN B . D , Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 103 (1972).
4. IVANCHIK I.I., Fizika tverd. Tela. 3, 3731 (1961), [Soviet Phys. Solid St. 3, 2705 (1962)].
5. KHOLODENKO L.P., Fizika tverd. Tela. 5, 897 (1963), [Soviet Phys. Solid St. 5, 660 (1963)];
GURO G.M., IVANCHIK I.I. and KOVTONYUK ibid. 10, 135 (1968) and 11, 1956 (1969)[ibid. 10,
100 (1968) and ] |, 1574 (1970)]; VUL B.M., GURO G.M. and IVANCHIK I.I., Fizika tekh. Poluprov.
4, 162 (1970) [Soviet Phys. Semicond. 4, 128 (1970)]; and CHENSKI E.V., Fizika tverd. Tela. 12,
586 (1970) [Soviet Phys. Solid St. 12, 446 (1970)].
6. TRIEBWASSER S., IBM J. Res. & Dev. 2, 212 (1958); JONA F. and SHIRANE G., Ferroelectric
Crystals, p.34, Pergamon P r e s s (1962).
7. GINZBURG V.L. and PITAEVSKII L.P., Zh. eksp. tcor. Fiz., 34, 1240 (1958) [Soviet Phys. JETP
7, 858 (1958)].