Sie sind auf Seite 1von 41

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

PROPOSED G+M WORKSHOP SHED


FOR M/S. POWER SOLUTION INDUSTRIES-LLC
PLOT NO. 5330133, SAIH SHUAIB (4)
DUBAI
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

M/S. POWER SOLUTION INDUSTRIES-LLC


GSI/0143/15/DXB

Electrical Cone Penetration Testing

Marine Geotechnical Investigation

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED G+M WORKSHOP SHED
FOR M/S. POWER SOLUTION INDUSTRIES-LLC
PLOT NO. 5330133, SAIH SHUAIB (4)
DUBAI
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

REPORT : GSI/0143/15/DXB 08th June 2016

REPORT ISSUE STATUS

<01> 08-June-16 Final Engineering Report MS NA ZM

Issue Date Description Prepared Checked Approved

M/s. POWER SOLUTION INDUSTRIES-LLC MATERIAL LAB


P.O. BOX 16800 P.O. BOX 114717
AJMAN DUBAI
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
M/s. Power Solution Industries-LLC
P.O. Box No. 16800
Ajman, U.A.E.

Ref: GSI/ 0143/15/DXB 08th June, 2016

For the Attention of Mr. Sajjad

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED G+M WORKSHOP SHED
FOR M/S. POWER SOLUTION INDUSTRIES-LLC
PLOT NO. 5330133, SAIH SHUAIB (4)
DUBAI
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

Dear Madam,

We have pleasure in enclosing herewith two hard and one soft copy of our final engineering report,
together with invoice for carrying out the work on the above project. If you should have any queries
with regard to our report, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Please note that soil samples related to this project will be retained at our storage facility for 1
calendar month, without charge, from the date of final engineering report, before disposal. In case
you wish to extend the storage period, please contact us before the intended disposal date.

We are pleased to have been of service on this occasion, and look forward to further co-operation on
future projects.

Yours faithfully,
MATERIAL LAB

________________________
Eng. Naseem Anwar
Geotechnical Manager

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED G+M WORKSHOP SHED
FOR M/S. POWER SOLUTION INDUSTRIES-LLC
PLOT NO. 5330133, SAIH SHUAIB (4)
DUBAI
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

CONTENTS PAGE

SUMMARY (i)

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1

3.0 LOCAL GEOLOGY 1

4.0 FIELD WORK 2

5.0 LABORATORY TESTING 4

6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5

7.0 ENGINEERING DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS 6

8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS 10

PLATES
PLATE 1 LOCATION PLAN
PLATE 2 SITE PLAN
PLATE 3 SPT VALUES VS DEPTH

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A FIELD RESULTS


APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX C APPENDICES TO SITE INVESTIGATION REPORTS
APPENDIX D SIESMIC ZONES IN ARABIAN PENINSULLA
Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
SUMMARY

A geotechnical investigation, comprising five (05) boreholes were drilled (i.e. 4 boreholes of 8.0m and 1
borehole of 15.0m depth) along with supplementary field testing, was performed as instructed by M/s.
Capital Engineering Consultant for the construction of proposed G+M workshop shed at Plot No. 533-
0133, Saih Shuaib (4), Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Fieldwork for the investigation was undertaken on
st th
between 1 and 5 June 2016.

A subsequent programme of laboratory testing was performed on representative soil samples recovered
from the site.

The subsurface conditions encountered are considered suitable for isolated strip/ raft foundation to be set
approximately at 1.0m-1.5m depth below existing ground level. Accordingly, allowable bearing pressures
for conventional strip/ pad or raft type of foundations have been given in section 7.1 of this report.

The corrosive potential of soil has also been considered with respect to appropriate concrete mix design
recommendations (section 7.2) and seismic design parameters has been given in (section 7.3) of this
report.

During the period of site works groundwater was not encountered up to the termination depth of
boreholes.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
1.0 INTRODUCTION

Material Lab (MLAB) was commissioned by M/s. Power Solutions Industries LLC to perform a
geotechnical site investigation for the construction of Proposed G+M Workshop Shed for M/s. Power
Solution Industries LLC at Plot No. 5330133, Saih Shuaib (4), Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The soil
investigation has been based on MLAB quotation ref no. Q-NA/G/0174/15/rev1 on 01st December 2015
and subsequent approval by the client on 06th December 2015. The work has been performed in general
accordance with the British Standards BS 5930: 1999 Code of practice for site investigations.

A total of five (05) boreholes (i.e. 4 boreholes of 8.0m and 1 borehole of 15.0m depth) were drilled on the
site for the proposed structure. The site location is indicated on the location plan, Plate 1. Field test
locations, relative to the proposed site layout, and existing site features, are indicated on the site plan,
Plate 2 respectively. Fieldwork for the investigation was performed on between 01st and 05th June 2016.
The factual field and laboratory data, together with appropriate engineering interpretation and discussion
of results, are presented herein.

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The site is located at Plot No. 5330133, Saih Shuaib (4), Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The three sides
i.e. (eastern, western and southern) of the plot were bounded by developed/ undeveloped plots named
5330132, 5330134 and 5330136 respectively. Whereas, the northern side of the plot was borders with
36.50ft wide asphalt road. The vehicle access was guaranteed from the northern side of the plot by an
adjacent asphalt road.

Please note that the site was the site was relatively flat, undeveloped and approximately at same level,
(except the BH-1, which is 1.0m below) related to the adjacent asphalt road at the time of site
investigation.

3.0 REGIONAL AND LOCAL GEOLOGY

The geology of the United Arab Emirates, and the Arabian Gulf area, has been substantially influenced
by the deposition of marine sediments associated with numerous sea level changes during relatively
recent geological time. With the exception of mountainous regions shared with Oman in the north-east,
the country is relatively low-lying, with near surface geology dominated by Quaternary to late Pleistocene
age, mobile aeolian dune sands, and sabkha/evaporite deposits.

The geologically stable Arabian Plate is separated from the unstable Iranian Fold Belt by the Arabian
Gulf. It is believed that a tilting of the entire Arabian Plate occurred during the early Permian period,
resulting in uplift in southern Yemen, and depression to the north-east. Crustal deformations and igneous
intrusions occurred in the north- east as a result of this movement. Subsequent tectonic movements,

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 1
peripheral to the folding of the Iranian Zagros Range, during the Plio-Pleistocene epoch, probably
contributed to the formation of both the Arabian Gulf depression, and the mountainous regions shared by
the United Arab Emirates and Oman in the north- east.

The near surface geology of the Dubai region is dominated by aeolian dune sand deposits of Holocene to
Pleistocene age.These deposits typically comprise fine grained silty calcareous sand, which is commonly
dense and variably cemented beneath a shallow, loose, normally consolidated mobile layer.
Although variable, the degree of cementation generally increases with depth, such that the variably
cemented sand grades to predominantly calcareous sandstone. Very silty, gypsiferous sabkha and
evaporite layers occur occasionally within the aeolian sand deposits.

Although surficial sabkha deposits are found throughout the coastal belt of the Arabian Gulf, and far
inland in the western and southern parts of the United Arab Emirates, they are not particularly common in
the Dubai region. Sabkha is an Arabic name used to describe relatively fine grained, hypersaline, silt and
sand deposits, which are commonly saturated with brine, and salt encrusted. These deposits form in
natural evaporation pans where saline water, introduced by sea invasion or elevated saline groundwater,
is able to accumulate at or near ground surface level, assisted by capillary action.

4.0 FIELD WORK

A programme of subsurface investigation performed at the site on between 01st and 05th June 2016,
included the following:

Four (04) exploratory boreholes were drilled to the depth of 8.0m below existing road level.
One (1) exploratory borehole to 15.0m depth below existing ground level
Regular split-spoon sampling during Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) in soils
Disturbed bulk soil sample from cable percussion drill cuttings
Backfilling of boreholes with arising material
Measurement of ground water level
Laboratory Testing
Presenting the engineering report

All of the investigation works were performed by experienced geotechnical personnel under the regular
supervision of an experienced geotechnical engineer. The works were performed in general accordance
with the British Standard BS 5930:1999 +A2:2010 Code of practice for site investigations.

Borehole locations are indicated on Site Layout 2.1 relative to the proposed site layout and existing
features. Field test results and observations are presented in Appendix A. The presentation of field
results is preceded by summarised explanations of borehole log symbols and classification systems, and
a summary of soil and rock strength definitions, on Plates A1.1 to A1.3, and A2 respectively.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 2
4.1 Exploratory Boreholes

A total of five (05) boreholes of 8.0m depth were drilled on the site. Drilling was performed using a trailer
mounted Pilcon Wayfarer cable percussion drilling rig. The boreholes were advanced through soil
deposits, including variably cemented sands, using cable percussive equipments and techniques.

The borehole locations were set out by our surveyor/engineer in accordance with the instructions of the
Clients Representative and is shown on the site layout presented as Plate 2.1.

Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were conducted at regular intervals within the soil layers in order to
estimate the relative densities and obtain samples for classification purposes. Test intervals were 0.5m to
a depth of 2.5m and thereafter 1.0m to the termination depth of boreholes.

SPTs were conducted in accordance with the relevant British Standard (BS 1377- Part 9); Methods of
test for soils for civil engineering purposes. The test involves driving a 50mm external diameter thick
walled split spoon sampler into the bottom of the borehole with successive blows of a 63.5kg hammer
falling freely through 760mm. The sampler is driven through 6 intervals of 75mm and the number of blows
required to penetrate each interval is recorded. The initial 150mm interval is intended to ensure seating
of the sampler such that it penetrates beyond the zone of influence of any soil disturbance at the base of
the borehole. The aggregate number of blows to drive the sampler over the final 300mm is termed the N
value, and is considered indicative of the in-situ relative soil density.

In very dense and/or cemented soil layers it is often not possible to ensure complete penetration of the
SPT sampler, due to driving refusal, or the risk of damage to sampling equipment as a result of hard
driving. The practical driving limit is of the order of 50 blows for the final 300mm penetration. Where
driving resistance exceeds this limit, SPTs are usually terminated with incomplete penetration. In such
cases the total 50 blows for cemented soil and 100 blows for very weak to weak sandstone driven against
the actual penetration depth is recorded on the borehole logs. A plot of SPT versus Depths is presented in
Plate 3.

Disturbed SPT and bulk soil samples collected during drilling were retained in sealed, labelled plastic
jars.

All samples were transported to the Material Lab sample processing and storage facility for detailed
logging and sample processing. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing to assist
with sample descriptions and determination of engineering material properties. Individual borehole logs
are presented in Appendix A, Plates A3.1.1 to A3.5.1.

During the period of site works groundwater was not encountered up to the termination depth of
boreholes.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 3
4.2 Backfilling of Boreholes

Each borehole was backfilled on completion with arising material from bottom to top of the borehole, in
order to avoid any future pollution of an aquifer. The site area was cleaned and cleared from any waste
during investigation work.

4.3 Setting out of Boreholes

Total five (05) boreholes were drilled on the site. Coordinates & drilled depth of all test locations are
summarised in Table 1. Please note that boreholes were marked on the site with the help of hand held GPS
as boreholes location given in the site plan by the client. Coordinates are based on the WGS84 system.

Table 1: Coordinates and Depth of Borehole Locations


Borehole WGS 84 Coordinates, Drilling Date Drilled Depth
No Zone 40 (m) *begl
Easting (m) Northing (m) Started Finished
BH-01 475219 2747741 01-06-16 01-06-16 8.0
BH-02 475261 2747700 02-06-16 02-06-16 8.0
BH-03 475320 2747679 04-06-16 04-06-16 15.0
BH-04 475324 2747608 05-06-16 05-06-16 8.0
BH-05 475373 2747645 05-06-16 05-06-16 8.0
*begl= Below Existing Ground Level

5.0 LABORATORY TESTING

A programme of laboratory testing was performed on selected samples of soil obtained during the
fieldwork. Test results have been used to assist with classifications, and determinations of relevant
physical and mechanical properties of soil and rock samples. Chemical testresults have been used to
determine the corrosivity of soil and groundwater. In general, laboratory testing has been performed in
accordance with ASTM and British Standard procedures. In general, laboratory testing has been
performed in accordance with following standards:

Table 2: Laboratory test Standards

S. NO. Laboratory Test Type Test Standard Test


Quantity
Particle Size Distribution (Wet BS-1377:Part 2: 1990: Amd. 9027: 1996: Cl:
1 4
Sieving Method) 9.2
BS 1377: Part 3: 1990: Cl 5.2 & 5.5: Amd
2 Determination of Sulphate for soil 2
9028:96

3 Determination of Chloride for soil BS 1377: Part 3: 1990: Cl7.3: Amd 9028:96 2

BS 1377: Part 3: 1990: Cl9:1990:Amd


4 Determination of p H value of soil 2
9028:96

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 4
Laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B.

5.1 Particle Size Distribution

The particle size distribution was determined for four (04) soil samples in accordance with the wet
sieving method described in BS 1377:Part 2. Compliance with the Standard, with respect to minimum
sample quantity is dependent on the maximum significant grain size and the method of sampling.

In particular, for SPT samples, the quantity of soil available for testing is typically about 100g. This
sample quantity is considered representative where grain sizes range up to 2mm (i.e. to coarse sand
size). Where significant quantities of coarser particles are present, the particle size distribution obtained
from SPT samples should be regarded as indicative only. It is particularly important to recognize the
limitations of SPT samples where medium to coarse grained gravels and/or cobbles are present.

The test results are presented as particle size distribution curves on Plates B1.1 to B1.2

5.2 Chemical Analyses.

Chemical analysis was performed on two (02) soil samples to determine sulphate content, chloride
content, and pH levels. These analyses were performed in accordance with the BS 1377: Part 3 methods
for testing acid soluble sulphate (expressed as percentage of sulfur trioxide) and chloride contents.

The chemical test results are summarised on Plate B2.1

6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The subsurface strata encountered during drilling are given on the Borehole Logs in Appendix A, Plates
A3.1.1 to A3.5.1. The borehole observations and test results indicate relatively consistent subsurface
conditions over the site.

The borehole revealed light brown, slightly silty, fine SAND with some cemented sand pieces and occasional
rootlets up to 0.50m depth followed by loose to lower bound of medium dense, brown, slightly silty to silty,
fine to medium SAND up to 1.0m depth below existing road level. (In BH-1, medium dense, sand was
present up to 1.0m depth below existing excavated level).

Below this medium dense, yellowish brown, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND up to 3.50m depth followed by
dense, brown, slightly silty to silty, slightly gypsiferous, fine to medium SAND with occasional cemented sand
pieces up to 6.50m depth below existing road level.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 5
Underlain by very dense, light brown, slightly silty to silty, slightly gypsiferous, fine to medium grained, slightly
to moderately cemented SAND up to the termination depth of 8.0m deep boreholes below existing road
level.

The design subsurface profile summarised below in Table 3 is recommended for foundation design
purposes. For more detailed, location specific descriptions, reference should be made to the borehole
logs presented in Appendix A.

Table 3 :- Recommended Design Subsurface Profile

Range
m (*begl) Material Description
Light brown, slightly silty, fine SAND with some cemented sand pieces and
GL to 0.50m
occasional rootlets
Loose to lower bound of medium dense, brown, slightly silty to silty, fine to medium
SAND
0.50m to 1.00m
In BH-1, medium dense, sand was present up to 1.0m depth below existing
excavated level).

1.00m to 3.50m Medium dense, yellowish brown, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND

Dense, brown, slightly silty to silty, slightly gypsiferous, fine to medium SAND with
3.50m to 6.50m
occasional cemented sand pieces

Very dense, light brown, slightly silty to silty, slightly gypsiferous, fine to medium
6.50m to 8.00m
grained, slightly to moderately cemented SAND
*begl= Below Existing Ground Level

During the period of site works groundwater was not encountered up to the termination depth of
boreholes.

7.0 ENGINEERING DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the subsurface conditions with respect to the design of
foundations for the proposed development. It is understood from the information provided by the client
that it is proposed to construct a Proposed G+M workshop shed and water tank on this site. However, at
the time of writing this report detailed information regarding foundation layout or loadings had not been
made available so that only a general discussion can be undertaken.

The observed subsurface conditions are such that moderate load bearing soils are present below
formation level.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 6
7.1 Shallow Isolated Footings and Raft Foundations

Allowable bearing pressures are dependent on the shear strength of the soil and the tolerance of the
proposed structure to settlement. In granular soils, the latter factor is normally more critical. Settlements
in such deposits normally take place during construction and initial loading but, where more silty or
cohesive materials exist; there could be a degree of time dependent consolidation.

Based on the field data and results of the Standard Penetration Tests (SPT), performed in this plot area,
the following allowable bearing pressure given in table 4 can be used safely for the isolated strip or pad
footings.

Table 4:- Recommended Allowable Bearing pressure for Isolated/Strip foundation (Meyerhof Method)

Structure Foundation Foundation Footing Width Allowable Bearing Expected


Type Type Depth Pressure Settlements

(m *begl) (m) (KN/m2) (mm)


Isolated
G+M Work
Shop/ strip/ pad 1.0-1.5 Up to 3.0m 125 25
Building footings
*begl=Below Existing Ground Level

Table 5:- Recommended Allowable Bearing pressure for Under Ground Water Tank Raft Foundation

Structure Foundation Foundation Allowable Bearing Expected Modulus of


Type Type Depth Pressure Settlement Sub Grade
Reaction
3
(m *begl) (KN/m2) (mm) KN/m

Underground
Raft 3.0-4.0 150 25 15,000
Water Tank

*BERL=Below Existing Road Level

The above bearing pressure values for Isolated foundations are calculated by Meyerhof Equation 4-12
given in Foundation Analysis and Design by Joseph E. Bowels (fifth edition) below.
qa= N/F2[(B+F3/B)2] Kd

Where, qa = allowable bearing pressure for 25mm settlement


F2 = Factor from Table page 264 taken as 0.08
F3 = Factor from Table page 264 taken as 0.3
N= SPT average "N" Values
B = Footing width
Kd = 1+0.33D/B
Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 7
When excavating to foundation level, care should be taken not to disturb strata underlying formation level
otherwise settlements in excess of those quoted above could occur. If any disturbance does occur, or if
any soft spots or gypsiferous materials are encountered, the material should be removed and replaced by
selected granular fill, which should be properly compacted before the foundations are constructed.

In addition precautions should be taken to prevent any ingress of water into more silty horizons both
during and after construction otherwise settlement in excess of those quoted above could occur.

Prior to construction of the foundations the soil at formation level should be thoroughly compacted in
accordance with good construction practice to not less than 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) as
determined from the modified Proctor test. The compacted surface should then be protected by
immediately covering with a layer of concrete blinding. At least (01) plate load should be carried out to
verify the bearing capacity of soil underneath.

When excavating to foundation level, care should be taken not to disturb strata underlying formation level
otherwise settlement in excess of those quoted above could occur. If any disturbance does occur, or if
any soft spots or gypsiferous soils are encountered, the material should be removed and replaced by
selected granular fill, which should be properly compacted before the foundations are constructed.

7.2 Concrete Design For Foundation Purposes

One (01) soil sample was tested for chemical analysis. The sulphate contents of the soil sample tested was
0.26% .The chloride content for the soil tested was 0.03%. The pH value of the samples tested was 8.3.

For guidance for a suitable concrete design it is recommended that reference should be made to CIRIA
Special Publication 31 (The CIRIA Guide to Concrete Construction in the Gulf Region published by the
Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London 1984). This publication considers
both sulphate and chloride contamination of soils and groundwater in various exposure conditions and is
not restricted just to sub-surface concrete.

Figure 6 and Table 13 from this publication is presented in Appendix C of this report and with reference to
this Figure it is considered that this site would be classed as significant sulphate and chloride
contamination. On the base of this consideration Exposure Condition d(ii) as per table 13 in appendix C
should be apply, and however it is recommended that an Sulphate Resisting Cement (SRC)or an ASTM
type II cement be used in a mix meeting the following criteria :-

Minimum cement content for 20mm aggregates 320 to 380 kg/m3


Maximum water : cement ratio 0.50 to 0.42
Minimum cover for reinforcement 40mm to 50mm

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 8
In addition it is recommended that the surface of all concrete in contact with the soil should be covered
with a suitable waterproof membrane or coating. However, prior to finalising and adopting a mix design,
appropriate consultation with the structural engineer is advised.

7.3 Seismic Design Parameters and Soil Profile Type

As no geophysical testing (i.e. cross-hole or down-hole seismic testing) was performed at the site, so no
analysis was made in the report. It should be noted that the below reported values are considered to be
tentative and based on the results of the drilled boreholes as well as the classification mentioned in the UBC
and that only geophysical logging of boreholes can give exact value of the shear wave velocity.

The current practices in UAE are to follow the provision of UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1994 for seismic
design parameters. However, the latest version of code (i.e. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1997) may also to
be adopted. Based on the provisions of (UNIFORM BUILDING CODE) and existing subsoil conditions in the
site, the following design parameters may be adopted:

According to Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1997 for seismic design parameters and based on seismic
activity, Dubai, United Arab Emirates has been grouped under Seismic Zone 2A with Seismic Zone Factor
(Z) 0.15.

The seismic design parameters for soil strata encountered at this site representing Soil Profile type SD (Stiff
Soil Profile ) may be adopted for the design with a shear wave velocity within the range up to 180 to 360
m/sec. as per UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1997. In addition, following Seismic Coefficients Cv and Ca can
be considered depending on the Seismic Zone Factor Z:

The seismic coefficient Ca = 0.18


The seismic coefficient Cv = 0.25

Based on the Uniform Building Code, UBC 1997, and subsoil conditions existing in the site, the average soil
strata seismic profile for this site is given below.

However, the available data about the earthquake and seismic zone for Arabian Peninsula is also attached in
Appendix D, Fig 1 to Fig 3.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 9
7.4 Construction Supervision

An experienced engineer or supervisor should be present on the site to oversee all earthworks and
foundation construction activities. In particular, it is recommended that all foundation excavations are
inspected by a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer, prior to foundation construction, to ensure that the
contact surface is properly prepared, and that exposed sub-surface conditions are consistent with design
assumptions.

In addition to above, at the time of foundation construction, this laboratory shall be contacted to carry out in-
situ field density, compaction, plate load, pile integrity tests (in case of piles recommendation) or other tests
recommended in this report at random locations selected by our engineer. Without which a letter of
confirmation cant be issued for the safe bearing pressure and foundation levels.

8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS

As mentioned in the report the boreholes made were of 150mm in diameter. The information received from
the limited number and the diameter of boreholes may not represent the entire site and may not reveal all the
weak layers or conditions especially when they are localized. Hence no responsibility can be borne for
conditions not revealed by boreholes made on the site. In case of any such findings we shall be contacted
immediately to arrange a site visit by a geotechnical engineer to make an onsite study of such conditions
after which recommendations if it is deemed necessary will be revised.

The borehole logs and related information represent subsurface conditions only at the specific locations and
times where sampling was conducted. Any lines designating the changes between soil and/ or rock layers
represent approximate boundaries. The transition between deposits / strata may be gradual, or may occur
between recovered samples.

The recommendations and discussions given in this report are based on the subsurface conditions
encountered during the site investigation work and on the results of the field and laboratory testing on
samples obtained from the limited number of boreholes. There may be, however, conditions pertaining to
the site which has not been in to account due to the limited number of boreholes.

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai) Page 10
PLATES

LOCATION PLAN PLATE 1


SITE PLAN PLATE 2
SPT VALUES VS DEPTH PLATE 3

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
SITE LOCATION
SAIH SHUAIB
4TH

SITE: Proposed G+M Workshop Shed TITLE: Location Plan


Plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4th,
Dubai,
JOB REF : GSI/0143/15/DXB United Arab Emirates

DATE: 09-Jun-16 CLIENT: M/s. Power Solution Industries LLC PLATE No: 1
BH1
BH2
BH3

BH5

BH4

SITE: Workshop Shed TITLE: Site Plan


Plot no. 5330133 BH No. Northing Easting
Saih Shuaib 4th 1 2747741 475219
Dubai, United Arab Emirates 2 2747700 475261
3 2747679 475320
4 2747608 475324
5 2747645 475373
JOB REF : GSI/0143/15/DXB
CLIENT: Power Solutions Industries LLC PLATE No: 1
DATE: 11-Jun-16
'N' VALUES
1 10 100
0
Very Loose Loose M.Dense Dense V.Dense

Design Profile
3
DEPTH (m)

4
D

BH 1-SPT BH2-SPT BH3-SPT Design Profile

SITE: Proposed Workshop Shed TITLE: Summary of SPT


Plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4th, Values vs Depth
Dubai,
JOB REF : GSI/0143/15/DXB United Arab Emirates

DATE: 09-Jun-16 CLIENT: M/s. Power Solution Industries-LLC PLATE No: 3


APPENDIX A
FIELD RESULTS

BOREHOLE LOG LEGEND & CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS PLATES A1.1 TO A1.3


SOIL/ROCK STRENGTH DEFINITIONS PLATE A2
BOREHOLE LOGS PLATES A3.1.1 TO A3.5.1

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
SYMBOL LEGEND FOR GEOTECHNICAL LOGS

Appendix A: Plate A1.1


SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (Based on BS 5930)

Appendix A: Plate A1.2


CARBONATE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (Based on Clark & Walker)

Appendix A: Plate A1.3


SOIL AND ROCK STRENGTH DEFINITIONS

Appendix A: Plate A2
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTS PLATE B1.1


CHEMICAL TEST RESULTS PLATE B2.1

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
REPORT ON PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Client M/s Power Solutions Industries LLC Report No GSI/0143/15/DXB


Project Workshop Shed Location Plot no. 5330133 Saih Shuaib 4th Dubai, UAE

100

90

80
Percentage Passing

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0.006

0.02

0.2

0.6

60.0
0.001

0.002

0.01

2.0

6.0

20.0
60.
0.06
0.0

0.0

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE
CLAY Cobble
SILT SAND GRAVEL

Lab. Ref. No. 4710/BH01/1


Borehole No. Sample No Depth (m) Description Clay (%) Silt(%) Sand(%) Gravels%)
BH01 S2 0.50-0.95 Slightly silty SAND 0 3 97 0

100
90
80
Percentage Passing

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.06

0.2

0.6

2.0

6.0

60.0
20.0

60.0
0.0

0.0

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE
CLAY Cobble
SILT SAND GRAVEL

Lab. Ref. No. 4710/BH01/2


Borehole No. Sample No Depth (m) Description Clay (%) Silt(%) Sand(%) Gravel(%)
BH01 S3 1.00-1.45 Slightly silty SAND 0 3 97 0

Tested By RPS Checked By MMR

Test Method:-BS 1377: Part 2: 1990: Amd. 9027: 1996: Cl: 9.2 (Wet Sieving).
Sample Preparation Method: BS 1377:Part 2:Cl.9.2.3 Amd. 9027:1996.

Note : This Test is Accredited by Dubai Accreditation Department. Plate :B 1.1

Result relates only to the item tested.


This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
REPORT ON PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Client M/s Power Solutions Industries LLC Report No GSI/0143/15/DXB


Project Workshop Shed Location Plot no. 5330133 Saih Shuaib 4th Dubai, UAE

100

90

80
Percentage Passing

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0.006

0.02

0.2

0.6

60.0
0.001

0.002

0.01

2.0

6.0

20.0
60.
0.06
0.0

0.0

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE
CLAY Cobble
SILT SAND GRAVEL

Lab. Ref. No. 4710/BH02/1


Borehole No. Sample No Depth (m) Description Clay (%) Silt(%) Sand(%) Gravels%)
BH02 S5 2.00-2.45 Slightly silty, slightly gravelly SAND 0 4 92 4

100
90
80
Percentage Passing

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.06

0.2

0.6

2.0

6.0

60.0
20.0

60.0
0.0

0.0

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE
CLAY Cobble
SILT SAND GRAVEL

Lab. Ref. No. 4710/BH05/1


Borehole No. Sample No Depth (m) Description Clay (%) Silt(%) Sand(%) Gravel(%)
BH05 S4 1.50-1.95 Slightly gravelly, slightly silty SAND 0 3 95 2

Tested By RPS Checked By MMR

Test Method:-BS 1377: Part 2: 1990: Amd. 9027: 1996: Cl: 9.2 (Wet Sieving).
Sample Preparation Method: BS 1377:Part 2:Cl.9.2.3 Amd. 9027:1996.

Note : This Test is Accredited by Dubai Accreditation Department. Plate :B 1.2

Result relates only to the item tested.


This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
APPENDIX C

APPENDICES TO SITE INVESTIGATION REPORTS

APPENDIX TO SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT PLATE C1


FIGURE 6 AND TABLE 13 FROM CIRIA SPECIAL PUBLICATION 31 PLATE C2

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)
APPENDIX TO SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT

C- 1.1 GROUNDWATER

The water level recorded in a borehole during boring and / or drilling does not indicate the actual
level of the water table. The drilling process and dewatering in the vicinity, can affect the level of
groundwater, particularly when rotary drilling is in process, the water is normally used as the drilling
fluid.

To obtain a true indication and for long term observations of the stable groundwater level perforated
standpipe/ piezometer should be installed in a borehole.

C- 1.2 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION

Factual evidence has been obtained from the results of the boreholes and other field tests. These
evidences only provide information about a relatively small column of the soil and rock and the
possibility of actual conditions differing must be recognised.

The comments and recommendations given in this report are subjected to the limitations imposed
by the inherent nature of the site investigation. Hence no responsibilities can be born for conditions
not revealed by boreholes or trial pits made on the site. In case of any such findings, we shall be
contacted immediately to arrange a site visit by our geotechnical engineer to make an onsite study
of such conditions after which recommendations if it is deemed necessary will be revised.

The interpretation and conclusions given in this report assume that the ground conditions do not
vary beyond the range revealed by the investigation. It is possible that different conditions may be
present on, or adjacent to the site which have not been investigated and therefore, have not been
considered.

The recommendations given in this report apply only to the proposed developments and should not
be used for any other project on the site or adjacent sites, without consulting this laboratory.

Appendix C: Plate C1.1


Appendix C: Plate C2.1
Appendix C: Plate C2.2
APPENDIX D

APPENDICES TO SEISMIC ZONES

SEISMIC ZONES IN ARABIAN PENINSULLA PLATE D

Report: GSI/0143/15/DXB (Geotechnical investigation for proposed (G+M) Workshop Shed at plot no. 5330133, Saih Shuaib 4, Dubai)

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen