Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Within various fields experts who have the same information, many disagree on a
topic, this can be seen within art and ethics. An expert is an individual with a set
knowledge in a specific area, an art would expert be an art critic while in ethics it would
disagree about the foundations of a common area due to their personal interpretations
and knowledge? Within the areas of knowledge from art and ethics, to a great extent
expert in a field can disagree about the foundations of a common area due to their
personal interpretation and knowledge. Within ethics there is a debate about what is
ethically right or wrong, ethics has to do with moral principles that govern a persons
behaviors of activities. Also, art critics are having a debate about what kind of pieces
can be called art as various standards and interpretations are involved. Art uses
creativity to produce aesthetic objects that are appreciated from their beauty and
emotional power. Although art critics and ethical philosophers may be evaluating a
certain topic, they may disagree if the topic can be seen as art or ethically right.
In the art community, critics have disagreements about what piece of work may
be considered as art since each critic may have different perspectives and values for a
specific art piece. Theodor Adorno, a German philosopher and sociologist (1903-1969),
stated in his book Aesthetic Theory that It is self-evident that nothing concerning art is
self-evident any more, not its inner life, not its relation to the world, not even its right to
exist. (Danto, 17) demonstrating that art is suppressed by regulations and standards, in
a way individuals are killing art, degrading its value. Adorno believed art should be
valued by its aesthetic beauty, individuals may be viewing the same art piece but they
can view its aesthetics differently. This connects to the aesthetic paradox which is that
2
art may have standards or that art is just beauty in the eye of the beholder. Within the
book The Paradox of Aesthetic Meaning by Lucius Garvin, it is explained that finding
meaning in a piece of art various from the evaluator. During the 1980s, graffiti grew and
was seen in art showcases, but art critics are still having the debate of whether graffiti
should be considered as art. A graffiti artist whos broken the restraints of art critics
definition of what is considered as art is Banksy, Banksys fame has grown throughout
the years and is now recognized as a world famous artist although his work consists of
graffiti pieces. George C. Stowers in Graffiti Art: An Essay Concerning the Recognition
of Some Forms of Graffiti as Art wrote that graffiti are a form of self expression which
involves imagination, planning, and effort which makes others feel emotions. Art in
general seems similar to the purpose of graffiti, which determines graffiti as art although
critics see it as something criminalizing. Stowers also stated that a lot of the opposition
of graffiti as an art form is because of its unexpected location and bold presentation, he
argues that an illegal location or its presentation should not be the reason why graffiti
will not be labeled as art. This demonstrates the disagreements with graffiti having a
place in the art field, as some view it as illegal and not as a way of self expression.
But, to an extent the art community should have some type of standards to
determine what is classified as art. Art critics argue that graffiti should not be considered
as art, since it is illegal in certain areas due to the vandalism that is occurring by the
graffiti. In a Vice article, it explained that graffiti are illegal as environmental laws state
that graffiti are illegal under the Criminal Damage Act of 1971, and an individual found
guilty are punished with a fine of $8,000. An example of this is the graffiti artist El Sexto,
also known as Danilo Maldonado Machado, who has been arrested multiple times for
3
vandalism by the Cuban regime. El Sextos work displays the truth of the Cuban
artist. Experts may disagree about their art standards and what can be classified as art
due to their personal beliefs or culture. But, Banksy throughout the years has gained a
name recognition for his graffiti works, capitalism has now been involved with his works
as individuals are willing to pay millions to get a piece by him or to extract the piece.
This demonstrates that once an individual makes a name for themselves, it seems
possible for them to defy the standards of art placed by critics, When street artists do it,
it's vandalism. When Banksy does it, it's art. (Vice) Art in some way does have
regulations about its consideration in the media, but if the individual has a big name
recognition, like Banksy, the art standards in place will not stop their work being
considered as art.
Also within ethics there is a debate about what can be considered ethically right
or wrong, as there are many things which impact an individual's thought of whats
ethically right. Bertrand Russell, a philosopher from the United Kingdom 1872-1970,
wrote a book called The Elements of Ethics; Right or Wrong which explains that what an
individual sees as ethically right has to do with their own morality. There is a debate
about what ethics is, but it all goes back down to morality. Russell explained that
determining if something is ethically good or wrong has two methods, the first method
used by utilitarians judging the rightness of an act by relating the good or bad
consequence that comes from it. The other methods used mostly by intuitionists is
judging the approval or disapproval of the morality. Russell believes that one should use
both methods to fully establish ones right or wrongs. Abortion is a topic where there is
4
the debate if it is ethically right as some people believe it is not morally right to abort an
unborn child. BBC explained that abortion is still a constant debate within ethics due to
legal and religious positions, in some countries it may be viewed as illegal due to a
heavy religious influence while another country may hold a more libertarian view
believing abortion is up to an individual. This demonstrates that within ethics, the reason
there are disagreements is mostly due to an individual's morality which impacts their
Yet, there are guidelines about what is ethically right due to ones moral
principles. Moral principles are developed within an individual over time, then impacting
their ethically viewpoint. Humans develop virtues, which are character traits that help us
develop into an ethically right human. Virtues are developed through learning and
practice, individuals from a different culture will develop different virtues. Due to people
having different virtues, this also causes debates about what is right or wrong, ones
environment will affect this. An example of something which has ethical debates is
euthanasia, which is the termination of someone's life only when guidelines are meet.
allowed to die if their illness is extreme, people should have the right to chose whether
they wish to die. But some people view euthanasia as ethically wrong due to religious
opposition as some believe that God should decide when someone should die, also
some individuals fear that laws regulating euthanasia would be abused. Individuals
would use their personal knowledge, like an experience of being in extreme sickness
pain, religion, or alternative medical remedies, to influence their personal belief of what
is ethically right.
5
Within ethics and art, there are significances to their implications because it's
important to know there is still a constant debate about what art or or what is ethically
right in the world. As of now, there are no set rules to follow within art and ethic due to
perspective, an older person may view graffiti to be vandalism as it was not glorified
during their time period. Also, an older individual may view abortion as ethically wrong
because they could have been raised with an extremely religious background and it was
not permitted during the time period they were raised, for example the catholic church
views abortion as bad. But a younger individual may view graffiti as a way of self
expression due to the change of media perspective as Banksy is now an individual who
has their art glorified in the media. Also, a younger person has now seen that abortion
or euthanasia is permitted in some countries which is why their morals may change and
Overall, within ethics and art there are many debates about what is ethically right
or wrong due to how sensitive the subjects are. Some subjects may be sensitive due to
it being based off of an individual's moral beliefs which are established as they grow.
Every individual will side with what is right or wrong due to what they feel the closest to.
What an individual feels close to will be affected by their age, religion, gender, or
environment. Due to these factors, this why that although an expert in a disciple has
access to the same facts, they may disagree with something, which was seen in art and
ethics.
Works Cited
Danto, Arthur Coleman. The abuse of beauty: aesthetics and the concept of art. Chicago, Ill:
Ellsworth-Jones, Will. The Story Behind Banksy. Smithsonian Magazine, Feb. 2013,
www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-story-behind-banksy-
Horne, Alex. Why Is Banksy the Only Person Allowed to Vandalize Britains Walls? Vice, 3
Feb. 2017.
Martinez, Alexandra. Cuban Artist and Activist El Sexto Abducted and Detained in Cuba
www.miaminewtimes.com/arts/cuban-artist-and-activist-el-sexto-abducted-and-detained-
Stowers, George C. An Essay Concerning the Recognition of Some Forms of Graffiti As Art.