Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Flexural Strength
Strength Development 2-4:
and Compressive Strength www.cptechcenter.org
(Three and Seven Day)
Purpose Why Do This Test? Test Method
Concrete strength is critical because it reects concretes 1. Sample and cast cylinder and beam specimens in
ability to carry intended loads. Flexural and compressive accordance with standard procedures.
strength testing are currently the standard methods of 2. Cover and protect specimens from evaporation and
evaluating and assessing pay factors for pavement concrete. damage for 24 hours.
The tests are required for calibrating maturity-based
3. Remove specimens from the molds and transfer to the
monitoring systems.
curing tanks.
4. Cure the specimens in a controlled environment until
they are broken.
Principle What is the Theory?
5. Remove the specimens from the curing tanks.
A measured force is applied to concrete samples of consistent
6. Place the specimens in the hydraulic testing frame and
cross-sectional area (beams and cylinders) until the samples
apply a force until the specimen breaks.
fail. The force required to break the sample is used to calculate
the strength based on the cross-sectional area of the sample. 7. Record the maximum force applied and the dimensions
of the specimen.
continued on next page
Test Apparatus
Conditions that may prevent the strength tests from being Concrete strength has long been an acceptance criterion
representative of the actual concrete strength include the for concrete pavements. From a long-term performance
following: standpoint, characteristics other than strength have a
signicant impact on pavement durability. Adequate strength is
The load rate does not conform to standard procedures;
a good indicator of concrete quality, but it does not guarantee
faster load leads to higher strength test results.
performance. Focusing on strength alone may ignore
Beam specimens are allowed to dry before testing, important properties, such as air entrainment, permeability, and
resulting in lower strength test results. workability.
APRIL 2008
This test summary is one of a set of summaries originally published Any opinions, ndings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed
in chapter 7 of the Testing Guide for Implementing Concrete Paving in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reect
Quality Control Procedures (Fick, G., Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, the view of Federal Highway Administration or Iowa State University.
2008). The testing guide is a product of a 17-state, Federal Highway Iowa State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color,
Administration pooled-fund project, Material and Construction age, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex,
Optimization for Prevention of Premature Pavement Distress in PCC marital status, disability, or status as a U.S. veteran. Inqueries can be
Pavements, TPF-5(066). The project was managed by the National directed to the Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, Iowa State
Concrete Pavement Technology Center at Iowa State University. University, 3680 Beardshear Hall, 515-294-7612.