Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 POPULATION
The earliest Pandavas founded capital city of Indraparastha in 1450 BC. The Delhi has
derived its name from Dillu’s Dilli (100 BC), which was sited east of Lalkot, or from
Dhilba founded by Tomar Kings in 736 AD. Some say it came from the mediueval town
of Dhillika located near Mehrauli. The other cities recorded are Surajpal’s Surajkund
(1024 AD), Anangpal’s Qila Lal Kot (1302 AD) Prithviraj Chauhan Qila Rai Pithora
(1170AD), Ala-ud-din Khiljii Sri Fort (1302 AD), Ghiya-ud-din Tughlaq, Tughlakabad
(1320 AD). Mughal Emperor Shahajahan founded the present Delhi in 17th Century with
about one lakh population (1642 AD). This area now knows as old Delhi. Finally British
built New Delhi south of Shahjahanabad and shifted their capital from Calcutta to Delhi
in 1931. The growth of Delhi up to the end of 19th century was nominal and started
gaining momentum during the 20th century. Subsequently, he size, structure and
character of Delhi have been continuously changing with rapid urbanisation. The
migration in 1947, industries, entrepreneurs and search for livelihood and success are
the factor for continuous urbanisation. However, the traffic and transportation systems in
Delhi have not developed to the desired level despite continuous effort towards it.
Delhi had a population of 9.40 million in 1991 and 12.79 million in 2001. It is expected
that the population will grow to 19.0 million by 2011 and 23 million in 2021. The total
area of Delhi is 1486 sq. km. with an urban are of about 500 sq. km. The population of
Delhi Urban Area (DUA) between 1941 and 1991 is given in Table 1.1. It is clear from
this table that Delhi’s population has increased by eighteen times in a span of last six
decades.
The average population growth rate is estimated as 4.80% per year during last six
decades. This also includes the migration in Delhi which is about 0.16 million person per
year. The Delhi Master Plan (DMP) has projected population between 12.5-13.0 million
in 2001. Out of this population, 0.64 million will be outside the urban area. However, it
was also recommended to restrict this population to 11.2 million in 2001 (Ref.
Annexure1). The Projected population in DMP is summarised in Table 1.2.
TABLE-1.1
POPULATION OF DELHI URBAN AREA (1941-91)
TABLE-1.2
POPULATION OF DELHI IN 2001 (MILLION)
It is also reported that 35% of Urban Delhi and 33% in the area of Delhi outside the
urbanisable limit of UTD will be employed. This would generate a work force of 4.91
million including floating workers population. The trade-wise distribution is as follows:
- Agriculture : 1.5%
- Establishment : 22.6%
- Construction : 4.7%
- Trade and Commerce : 19.9%
- Transport : 10.2%
- Other Services : 32.4%
- Floating Work Force : 8.7%
Delhi Master Plan 2021 is over due for publication hopefully will be available for users
soon.
1.2 VEHICLES
Vehicle population in Delhi is highest among all metropolitan cities (Bombay, Calcutta,
Delhi and Madras). During 1985 to 2001 the total number has multiplied four times. It is
observed that the rate of growth of personalised vehicles is more than other types. The
average annual growth rate of vehicles is about 19.7. On an average about 500 new
vehicles area added in Delhi every day.
The main sources of air pollution in Delhi are buses, cars, auto rickshaws, trucks and
scooter/ motor cycles. In the year 1993 there were about 47,800 cars/ jeeps; 1,403,000
scooters/ motorcycles; 11,400 taxis; 70,500 three wheelers; 23,200 buses and 111, 300
trucks. These put together indicate that about 2.1 and 3.6 million vehicles were plying in
Delhi during years 1993 and 2001. The details of these vehicles are given in Table 1.3.
This data has been utilised to predict fuel consumption and ambient air quality as
reported in Chapter-4.
TABLE-1.3
DETAILS OF VEHICLES IN DELHI
The first ever traffic study of Delhi was carried out by the Central Road Research
Institute (CRRI) in 1957 titled ‘Origin –Destination Survey of Traffic of Greater Delhi’.
This study indicated average trip length for vehicles and suggested the ring railway
system. The output of this study in 1962 were utilised in the preparation of “Master Plan
for City of Delhi” having 1981 as the horizon year. In 1984, Delhi Development Authority
(DDA) revised this document for the year 2001. In all about 35 studies have been carried
out in Delhi.
From the above studies, it is clear that the Mass Rapid Transport System (MRTS) for
Delhi has been under active consideration for more than three decades. The Indian
Railways Study Group in 1986 suggested a specific alignment for the East-West
Corridor and Task Force of Ministry of Urban Development in 1987 recommended a
system for the East-West Corridor. Based on RITES study the construction of Delhi
Metro Phase-I is progress. This phase of the network comprises of about 65 km of route
length with about 13 km underground called Metro Corridor and 52 km surface/ elevated
rail corridor. The Rail corridor form Shahdara to Rohini/ Rithala and Metro corridor form
Vishwa Vidyalayala to ISBT have been completed, commissioned and in operation. The
Barakhamba-Dwarka corridor is under construction. The Government in principle has
agreed for implementation of six more lines totalling to 53.02 km and construction of
depot at Yamuna Bank in second phase of construction. These lines are:
The Mass Transport needs of Delhi are currently met mainly by buses which are over
crowded and unreliable with long waiting periods at bus stops. Consequently the use of
personalised vehicles is growing, leading to increased road congestion, fuel wastage
and environmental pollution. (Refer Chapter-3). It is in this context that a detailed
feasibility for MRTS Phase-II along with Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study
has been assigned to RITES by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). This report is on
EIA of Phase-II.
The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the present study were drawn up in accordance with
the guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies issued by Ministry of
Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India (GOI) for Transport Projects.
Schedules I list the projects need environmental clearance from MoEF. However Rail
projects are exempted from this list and hence environmental clearance. The study has
been conducted by RITES as per TOR and the requirements of the Environmental
Appraisal Committee (EAC) constituted by MoEF for transport projects.
RITES were in-charge for the preparation of the feasibility study (FS) as well as the EIA
study. RITES was, therefore, in a position to integrate environmental concepts in the
project preparation process. Such integration was advantageous both for FS and EIA.
To prepare this report, literature review, consultation with various departments, ground
truth and sampling mission were undertaken and laboratory analysis was carried out.
The consultant has collected baseline information on land use and demography, flora
and fauna, air pollution and noise, soils, ground water regime, historical monuments and
property.
In Chapter-2 a concise documentation is given of current and planned activities and the
expected main beneficiaries. Chapter-3 summarises environmental baseline conditions
including physical, biological and socio-economic parameters and pre-project
environmental constraint such as air pollution, problems related to public health and
traffic congestion. Potential negative and positive impacts are presented in Chapters-4
and 5 respectively. Expected negative impacts are listed under the following headings:
These include issues such as loss of land, rehabilitation and resettlement, disposal of
soil, loss of trees, noise and vibration, disruption of utilities/ facilities, socio-economic
and other problems due to the development of proposed Mass Rapid Transport System
Phase-II in Delhi.
Based on the anticipated negative impacts, the project may bring about an
environmental management strategy, which has been outlined in Chapter-6. This as
indicated in Chaptre-4. Chapter-7 includes post project environmental monitoring
programmes. This programme aims at signalling any potential environmental problem
during construction and operation of the project and it should allow for timely
implementation of corrective measures. Finally, a summary of the costs of the
environmental management and monitoring programmes falling under the responsibility
of the project is presented in Chapter-8. This also includes the cost of disaster
management plans and emergency information systems. The literature, books, reports
referred, is detailed in References. Where applicable, more detailed information on
methods used is included in concerning paragraphs.