Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FITRIA HANIM
157835459
P2TK 2015
1. Introduction
Communication is an essential part of life. No one can deny that it has great role
in human life. We cannot imagine how if our live without communication among the
people around us. There will be nothing. No way of talking anything to anyone, no way
to built a relationship with other, no way of share ideas and information, and so on. As
a social being, interaction between one with another by means of language is
unavoidable.
Language is a system of sounds and words to express ones personal reactions,
emotions and thoughts as well as to share information in daily social life
(Goldstein:2008). In addition, according to Sapir (1921) language is a purely human
and non-instinctive method of communicating ideas, emotions and desires by means
of voluntarily produced symbols. Language is meaningful, when the meaning is
conveyed though language, people use language to interact and establish relations, to
influence their behavior and express than expressions of the word.
Pragmatics is concerned with the study of the relationship between expression
and the use of this expression in a communicative situation, particularly the
relationship between sentences and context and situation in which they occur. In
simply, pragmatic is the study how people get the meaning from an utterance which
uttered by other people. The utterances meaning consists of two kinds; the literal
meaning and the contextual meaning. Pragmatics concerns with the contextual
meaning (implied meaning). The contextual meaning means the meaning beyond the
utterance. To get the contextual meaning, people should consider with the factors
which include in the conversation. Those are the internal factor (who speaks, to whom,
when, where, and about what) and the external factor (ages, power, status).
Levinson (1983) states that deixis concerns the way in which languages
encode or grammaticalize features of the context of utterance or speech event, and
thus also concerns ways in which the interpretation of utterances depends on the
analysis of that context of utterance.
2. Deixis
Deixis is clearly a form of referring that is tied to the speakers context, with the
most basic distinction between deictic expressions being near speaker versus
away from speaker (Yule:1996). It can be simplified into technical term for one of
the most basic things we can do with utterances. Deixis is a word or phrase which
directly relates an utterance to a person, time, place, social and discourse. For
example:
The word I, you, it, and here are deixis. I refers to the speaker, you refers to the
addressee, it refers to a cup of coffee, and here refers to a particular place that
showed by the speaker.
Deixis can also interpreted as an expression which has exact meaning but
varies with the context in which is uttered.
I will meet you an hour later there. Im still here now.
The utterance can be interpreted into exact various meanings. It depends on
the context itself; who is the speaker and to whom, where he speaks and when. For
instance:
1. If the utterance uttered by a director to his secretary by phone. The directors
position is still in his client office. Whereas, his secretary is in the office. We can
conclude that the speaker (director) needs to meet his secretary an hour later (if
he speaks at 4, it means they will meet at 5) in his office. So, I = the director, you
= the secretary, there = directors office, here = his client office
2. If the utterance uttered by a husband to his wife in face to face communication.
The context is a wife asks her husband to go to her mothers house but her
husband is still planting flower in the garden. So the exact meaning of the
utterance is the speaker (husband) will meet his wife at her mothers house an
hour later (if he speaks at 8a.m it means they will meet at 9a.m) as he still in the
garden when he utters the utterance. I = husband, you = his wife, there = wifes
mother house, here = in the garden.
3. If we found the utterance (in written form) hangs on our doors home,
consequently we cannot interpret the exact meaning. As we do not know the
exact context of the utterance.
In conclusion, first, to avoid misunderstanding and to make the
communication successful-between the speaker and the addressee-we should
create the clear context. Everything must clear. Who speaks, to whom, where and
when he/she speaks. Deixis is nothing without clear context. Second, one utterance
can be interpreted into various exact meaning by using deixis. It depends on the
context given.
The utterance above will not arise the multiple interpretations when
the speaker and addressee are in face to face communication. The
word here is belong to the spatial deixis which indicates a particular
location/place which is showed by the speaker.
However, it does not apply to the following context of an utterance
which is recorded of a telephone answering machine.
I am not here now
When the utterance is uttered by a telephone answering machine, it
will appear the multiple interpretations. Since, the speakers location is
not absolute. He/she might be outside home, on the way, at the office or
other place.