Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
4. Oil Price Shocks and the Stock Market: Evidence from Japan
Abhyankar, Abhay; Xu, Bing; Wang, Jiayue. The Energy Journal;
Cleveland34.2 (2013): 199-222.
Abstract We study, using a structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) model, the
relationship between oil price shocks and the Japanese stock market. We find that
oil price shocks that arise from changes in aggregate global demand are positively
correlated to returns on the Japanese stock market. Thus, in contrast to the
conventional wisdom, a rise in oil price is not always bad news for the Japanese
stock market. On the other hand, the Japanese stock market reacts negatively to
oil price increases related to oil-market specific demand shocks. Finally, different
from prior research using U.S. stock market data, we find that supply and demand
shocks in the global crude oil market affect returns to the Japanese stock market
index through changes to expected real cash flows rather than to changes to
expected returns
This paper pays attention to the issuance of corporate bonds to explore the effect
of corporate bonds of listed companies on the financing and corporate
governance. We find that the costs of issuance of corporate debt financing are
still higher than the cost of equity financing. Corporate bonds of listed companies
in China still can not change the "preferences for equity financing" in a short time.
But the bond financing for the improvement of corporate governance will help
improve corporate performance.
Abstract Using a hand collected data set of 138 buy-outs, this paper presents the
first analysis of the impact effects of public to private transactions (PTP) in the UK
during a period (1998-2004) in which PTPs became a significant part of the market
for corporate control. We find that for all PTPs there is a significant improvement
in financial health in the post deal years relative to the year before going private.
We also find that there is a significant improvement in the financial health of PTPs
relative to firms remaining public. The analysis of the individual elements of the z-
score shows that there are significant improvements in working capital and
liquidity post deal. Profitability, however, shows significant declines in a number
of the post deal years. We also find that both private equity (PE) and non PE-
backed deals produce improvements in financial health but that there is no
difference between the two types of deal. These outcomes provide some support
for the Jensen (Am Econ Rev 76:323-329, 1986 , Harv Bus Rev 67:61-74, 1989 )
arguments that going private creates an organizational structure that reduces
agency costs. However, they do suggest that the claims that the financial and
governance mechanisms imposed by PE providers will produce better outcomes
are strictly limited in the second wave of PTPs
15. Private equity, investment and financial constraints: firm-level
evidence for France and the United Kingdom
Abstract This paper analyses the effects of private equity firms on the
investments and financial constraints of their portfolio firms. We use dynamic
panel data techniques to account for unobserved firm heterogeneity and
endogeneity of private equity backed buyouts and expansion financing, and apply
our framework to a large panel data set of firms in the UK and France. In both
countries, we find that portfolio firms are characterized by higher investment
levels and fewer financial constraints after expansion financing. In the UK, private
equity backed buyouts outperform non-private equity backed firms in terms of
both indicators
Abstract This paper compares companies that went from publicly owned to
privately held status before and after the recession of 2008. Previous research
suggests that certain internal and external financial conditions favor migration to
private ownership. The majority of these studies focused on two time periods,
when there was a flurry of transactions taking companies private. With the
economic downturn starting in late 2007, the number of public-to-private (PTP)
transactions decreased substantially with the tightening of credit markets.
Nevertheless, over 100 PTP filings were made in the U.S. between 2008 and 2011,
suggesting that some companies continued to perceive the benefits of private
ownership. This study hypothesized that the corporate governance structure of
firms going private between 2008 and 2011 would be different than that of firms
going private before 2008, and in particular, that certain governance antecedents
in place for the later group would encourage the decision to go private despite
the decreased availability of debt financing. Board composition and institutional
ownership were found to be relevant in the decision to go private in the later
period. The findings suggest that corporate governance dynamics do matter and
shape the organizational variables that affect corporate restructuring under
different external conditions.
Abstract Over the last few years, India has become one of the heading
destinations for venture capital and private equity investments. The rapid growth
of GDP and liberalisation of the economy helped a lot for the development of
venture capital industry in India. In recent years, venture capital and private
equity investments have grown at a rapid pace. According to venture economic
data, during the period 1990 -99, Indias ranking was 25 out of 64 countries of the
world and various venture capital and private equity funds raised US $ 945.9
million for investments in India. This picture was brighter during the next decade
with Indias ranking score to 13 out of 90 countries and the funds raised $
16,685.5 million for investments in India. By the end of year 2009, Indias ranking
was 10 out of 77 countries of the world, and it rose to number three slot
worldwide in quantum of investments. A lot of variation is noticed in investment
trend during the last one decade. This paper makes an attempt to analyse the
investment trend of venture capital and private equity investments in India during
the last one decade.
18. Equity Market Liberalization, Credit Constraints and Income
Inequality