Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Tier II Engineering: The relevant Under Graduate program should have scored
minimum 700 marks out of 1000 marks.
2. Tier I Engineering: The relevant Under Graduate program should have scored
minimum five Compliances(Y).
3. The above conditions will not be applicable to the Post Graduate Program, that do not
have corresponding Under Graduate Program.
4. The program should have minimum 40% GATE qualified students based on the
sanctioned intake, excluding sponsored category of students; as an average of
previous three years including the current academic year. If specialization not covered
under GATE then those cases will be considered on case to case basis.
5. Program shall have at least two faculty with Ph. D qualification during the previous
two year including the current academic year.
6. Program shall have at least one professor with Ph.D. qualification and one associate
professor with Ph.D. qualification having expertise in the domain of the Post Graduate
Program during the previous two years including the current academic year.
7. Department shall have 1:20 Faculty Student Ratio during the previous three years
including the current academic year.
SAR Contents
Criteria Summary
2 Program Outcomes
3 Students Performance
4 Faculty Contributions
6 Continuous Improvement
University
Deemed University
Autonomous
Affiliated Institution
Note:
In case of Autonomous and Deemed University, mention the year of grant of status by the authority
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government
State Government
Government Aided
Self-financing
Trust
Society
Section 25 Company
Provide Details:
Year Increase
Program Year of AICTE Accreditation
S. No. of Intake in intake,
Name increase Approval Status*
Start if any
Table: A.8.1
* Write applicable one:
Applying first time
Granted provisional accreditation for two years for the period (specify period)
Granted accreditation for 5 years for the period (specify period)
Not accredited (specify visit dates, year)
Withdrawn (specify visit dates, year)
Not eligible for accreditation
Eligible but not applied
Note: 1. Add rows as needed. 2. Separate tables for UG and PG Programs to be prepared.
N.
Table: A.9.1
10. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
i. Name:
Designation:
Mobile No:
Email id:
2. Justification of consistency of the Department Vision and Mission with the Institute Vision
and Mission
2 VLSI Electronics
N.
Table: B.3.1
4. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) for the PG program(s) under
consideration for accreditation.
Criteria Summary
2. Program Outcomes 75
3. Students Performance 75
4. Faculty Contributions 75
6. Continuous Improvement 75
Total 500
CRITERION 1 Program Curriculum and Teaching Learning Processes 125
1.1.1. State the process for designing the program curriculum (10)
(Describe the process that periodically documents and demonstrates how the program
curriculum is evolved or give the process of gap analysis, whichever is applicable,
considering POs)
Total
Table: 1.1.2
# Seminars, project works may be considered as practical
Curriculum Content
(% of total number Total number of Total number of
Course Component
of credits of the contact hours credits
program)
Program Core
Program Electives
Open Electives
Mini Projects
Internships/Seminars
Major Project
1.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University
curriculum for attaining the Program Outcomes (10)
2.1. Establish the connect between the courses and POs (15)
POs Courses*
PO1
PO2
PO3
POn
Table: 2.1.1
*Mention the courses relevant to the PO
2.2.1. Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon which
the evaluation of Program Outcome is based (20)
POs Attainment
C101
C102
C201
Attainment levels
Table: 2.2.2
Observations on attainment levels for each of the POs.
CRITERION 3 Students Performance 75
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2 (LYG)
CAYm3 (LYGm1)
CAYm4 (LYGm2)
Table: 3.2
3.1. Enrolment Ratio (20)
Enrolment Ratio= N1 /N; N is sanctioned intake; N1 is number of students admitted through GATE.
Item Marks
(Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the last three
years staring from Current Academic Year)
>=80% students enrolled 20
>=60% students enrolled 16
<40% 0
Table: 3.1.1
Assessment Points = 20 average placement; N is the total no. of students admitted in first year
Table: 3.3.1
(List the publications along with the names of the authors and publishers, etc.)
CRITERION 4 Faculty Contributions 75
Academic Research
Qualification
Development
Degree (highest degree)
Department
Designation
Research)
Ph.D. Guidance
Year of Graduation
University
Note: Please provide details for the faculty of the department, cumulative information for all the shifts
for all academic years starting from current year in above format in Annexure - II.
S=Number of Students in the Department = UG1 + UG2 +.. +UGn + PG1 + PGm
F = Total Number of Regular Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
Note: 75% should be Regular/Full Time faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual
Faculty/Adjunct Faculty/Resource Person from industry as per AICTE norms and
standards.
The contractual Faculty will be considered for assessment only if a faculty is drawing
a salary as prescribed by the concerned State Government for the contractual faculty
in the respective cadre and who have taught over consecutive 4 semesters.
4.2.1. Faculty name and specialization for the program under consideration (10)
Name of the faculty Relevant Area of Specialization
CAY CAYm1
Table 4.2.1.1
4.2.2. Faculty Research Publication (10)
Name of the faculty Academic Research
Number of quality Ph.D. guided /Ph.D.
publications in
awarded during the
refereed/SCI Journals,
citations, Books/Book assessment period while
Chapters etc.
working in the institute
CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3
Table 4.2.2.1
4.2.3. Faculty Development work (10)
(Mention details such as program title, description, duration, resource person, type of training,
training methodology, participants, etc.). Mention details separately for the programs organized
and the programs participated outside the institution)
Funded research from outside; considering faculty members contributing to the program:
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding Amount (Cumulative of three assessment years):
Amount >50 Lacs 15 Marks,
Amount >40 and <50 Lacs 10 Marks,
Amount >30 and <40 Lacs 5 Marks,
Amount >15 and <30 Lacs 2 Marks,
Amount <15 Lacs 0 Mark
5.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories in area of Program specialization (30)
1.
N.
Table 5.1.1
1.
N.
Table 5.2.1
5.3. Access to laboratory facilities, training in the use of equipment (15)
CRITERION 6 Continuous Improvement 75
6.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs (25)
Identify the areas of weaknesses in the program based on the analysis of evaluation of POs
attainment levels. Measures identified and implemented to improve POs attainment levels for the
assessment years including curriculum intervention, pedagogical initiatives, support system
improvements, etc.
Entrepreneurs
Highest Score
Minimum Score
Table 6.4.1
6.5. Improvement in quality of paper publication (10)
Program Outcomes
PO1: An ability to independently carry out research /investigation and development work to
solve practical problems
PO3: Students should be able to demonstrate a degree of mastery over the area as per the
specialization of the program. The mastery should be at a level higher than the
requirements in the appropriate bachelor program
The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the format given below:
I undertake that, the institution is well aware about the provisions in the NBAs accreditation
manual concerned for this application, rules, regulations, notifications and NBA expert visit
guidelines in force as on date and the institute shall fully abide by them.