Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
May Chaw Su Kyi, Department of Civil Engineering, Mandalay Figure 1. Proposed transmission tower
Technological University, (e-mail: maychawsukyi@gamil.com). Mandalay,
Myanmar, +95 9 428002694, Kyaw Lin Htat, Department of Civil
Engineering, Mandalay Technological University, Mandalay, Myanmar,
+95 9 43161370, (e-mail: kyawlinhtat@gmail.com).
1
All Rights Reserved 2012 IJSETR
International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR)
Volume 1, Issue 1, July 2012
Input data
(1) Overall height of tower 30 m D.Loading Consideration
(2) Width at base of tower 4.5 m Tower loading is most important part of tower design.
(3) Width of cross arm 6.3 m The transmission line tower is a pin jointed light structure
(4) Projection of cross arm 2.4 m for which the maximum wind pressure is the chief criterion
(5) Top clearance 3.8 m for design.
(6) Vertical clearance 4.0 m
The loadings which are considered during the project are
(7) Bottom clearance 18.5 m
as follows:
Basic data (1) Dead Load
(1) Angle of line deviation 0 to 2 degree (2) Wind load
(2) Terrain type Plain (3) Earthquake load
(3) Design wind span 400 m
(4) Design weight span 600 m (1) Dead Load
(5) Wind speed 80 mph, 100 mph Dead loads acting on the tower are vertical loads such as
(6) Exposure category C self weight of tower members, ground wire, conductor,
(7) Seismic zone 4 insulator, line man, equipments used during construction
(8) Soil profile type SD and maintenance.
Conductor Dead load of conductor acting on tower cross arm Wc,
(1) Type ACSR ZEBRA
(2) Diameter 0.02862 m Wc Lwe .c
(3) Area 4.845 cm2 (1)
(4) Unit weight 1.621 kg/m where,
(5) Ultimate tensile strength 13289 kg
c = Weight of conductor per meter length
(6) Coefficient of linear 1.93x10-5 / deg C
expansion Lwe = Designed weight span
(7) Modulus of elasticity 7.04x105 kg/cm2 Dead load of earth wire acting on top of tower peak We,
2
All Rights Reserved 2012 IJSETR
International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR)
Volume 1, Issue 1, July 2012
and ground wire) may be determined from the following E. Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Equation
equations. Load and resistance factor design describes one way of
Gw 0.7 1.9 E Bw assessing behavior at various limit states. The following of
LRFD design equation is recommended for the design of
(4) components in a transmission line.
E 4.9 (33 / zo )1 /
(5) (i)Reliability condition
1 QD = effect of (DL and Q50) or
Bw QD = effect of (DL and QRP)
1 0.8 L / Ls (ii)Security condition
(6) QD = effect of (DL and SL)
where, (iii)Safety condition (construction and maintenance)
zo = effective height (ft) QD = effect of {CM (DL and C&M)}
L = design wind span of the wires (ft) where,
h = total structure height (ft) DL = dead loads
, , Ls= wind parameters = load factor applied to the load effect Q50under
The structure gust response factor (G t) is used for consideration
computing the wind load acting on transmission structures. Q50 = loads that have a 50-year return period
The structure gust response factor (G t) may be determined QRP = loads that have a RP-year return period
from the following equations. SL = security loads
Gt 0.7 1.9 E Bt CM = load factor applied to all the loads
(7)
F. Nature of Loads
E 4.9 (33 / zo )1 /
Nature of Loads as given by Transmission Line Manual
(8) is as follows:
1 (i)Transverse loads:
Bt
1 0.375h / Ls This type of load covers
(9) Wind load on tower structure, conductor, ground
where, wire
zo = effective height (ft) and insulator strings.
L = design wind span of the wires (ft) Component of mechanical tension of conductor
h = total structure height (ft) and
, , Ls= wind parameters ground wire.
(iii)Longitudinal loads:
(3)Earthquake Load This type of load covers
An earthquake consists of horizontal and vertical ground Unbalanced horizontal loads in longitudinal
motions, with vertical motion usually having much the direction
smaller in magnitude. The horizontal motions of the ground due to mechanical tension of conductor and/or
cause the most significant effect. It is that effect which is ground
usually thought of as earthquake load. When the ground wire during broken wire condition.
under structure having certain mass suddenly moves; the
inertia of the mass tends to resist the movement. A shear
force is developed between the ground and the mass. G.Loading Combination
Earthquake load data are as follow; Loading Combinations given by the IS 802: Part 1: Sec:
Seismic zone IV 1:1995 are as follows:
Zone factor, Z 0.4 (i) Reliability Condition (Normal Condition):
Soil type 4 Transverse loads
Importance factor, I 1.25 Vertical loads
Near source factor, Na 1.0 Longitudinal loads
3
All Rights Reserved 2012 IJSETR
International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR)
Volume 1, Issue 1, July 2012
Vertical loads different wind loads. In general, maximum axial forces and
Longitudinal loads angle sections are increased in main members.
Broken Wire Condition:
TABLE II
Transverse loads
COMPARISON OF DESIGN SECTION RESULTS
Vertical loads
Longitudinal loads Sr. Design sections
Panel Member
no 80 mph 100 mph
(iii) Safety Condition (Construction and Maintenance):
Normal Condition: 1. Panel 1 Main member L30308 L35358
Transverse loads Bracing L30306 L35354
Vertical loads Redundant L25253 L25254
Longitudinal loads 2. Panel 2 Main member L30308 L35358
Broken Wire Condition: Bracing L30304 L35354
Transverse loads Redundant L25253 L25254
Vertical loads 3. Panel 3 Main member L30308 L30308
Longitudinal loads Bracing L25254 L25254
Redundant L20202 L20202
III. MODELING APPROACH 4. Panel 4 Main member L20202 L20202
Figure 2. 3D view of proposed transmission tower Figure 3. Comparison of maximum axial forces results
IV. MAXIMUM FORCE AND DESIGN SECTION RESULTS V. BOLT AND NUT CONNECTIONS
Transmission towers typically use bearing type bolted
Members for main legs, bracings and redundant should connections. In nominal thread diameters of 5/8", 3/4", and
be selected for meeting the required ultimate stress for both 7/8" for use in the construction of transmission towers.
compression and tension. The tower is analyzed different Load carrying capacity of the bolted connections depends
wind loads in STAAD.Pro software and the following on shear strength of the bolt and bearing strength of the
design sections and maximum force results are obtained. connected plate. The bolts for proposed transmission tower
Table II & III show that the steel angle sections and are A 394, Type 0 bolt with an allowable shear stress of 55.2
maximum axial forces for each panel with different ksi across the threaded part. Table IV, V and VI are no. of
members (main members, bracings and redundant) in bolts, shear capacity and bearing capacity of wind speed 80
mph and 100 mph.
4
All Rights Reserved 2012 IJSETR
International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR)
Volume 1, Issue 1, July 2012
TABLE V
COMPARISON OF SHEAR CAPACITY RESULTS
Figure 5. Comparison of bearing capacity results
Sr. Shear capacity (kip)
Panel Member
no 80 mph 100 mph
1. Panel 1 Main member 99.9 133.2 VI. CONCLUSIONS
Bracing 33.3 33.3
In this paper, double circuit suspension type
Redundant 33.3 33.3 transmission tower is evaluated with different wind loads.
2. Panel 2 Main member 99.9 133.2 Tower is analyzed and designed by using STAAD.Pro
Bracing 33.3 66.6 software. The design of tower is considered wind speed 80
Redundant 33.3 33.3 mph and 100 mph. Connection designs are used 3/4 "
3. Panel 3 Main member 66.6 66.6 diameter, A 394 Type 0 bolts and A 36 steel. Due to 21
loading conditions; each member subjected to maximum
Bracing 33.3 33.3
stress under any of these loading conditions is assigned an
Redundant 33.3 33.3 angle size related to quality. The vertical loads of safety
4. Panel 4 Main member 33.3 33.3 condition are more than that of security condition because
safety condition is considered load factor and worker load.
But transverse loads of both conditions are the same. The
highest value of maximum axial force is 73.6 kips which
occur in main member (panel 1). The axial forces are
increased by 47.2% in 100 mph wind speed as compared
with 80 mph wind speed. In this study, bolted connections
are mainly used for joint design. Shear capacity and bearing
capacity are greater than maximum axial forces in each
panel. In addition, shear capacity and bearing capacity of
bolts are the same, 33.3% resulted when using 100 mph
wind speed as compared to 80 mph wind speed. Generally,
design section, maximum axial forces, no. of bolts and nuts,
shear capacity and bearing capacity results are the same in
panel 3 & 4 sections.
5
All Rights Reserved 2012 IJSETR
International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR)
Volume 1, Issue 1, July 2012
6
All Rights Reserved 2012 IJSETR