Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
5Why
MQCTLW100
June2009
6/15/2009 0
5 Why Analysis What is it?
1
6/15/2009
5 Why Analysis What is it?
3 Legged 5 Why?
2
6/15/2009
Why Use 3L5Y?
Specific Cause
Why was the customer complaint created?
Detection Cause
Why did our test methods not filter it out?
3
6/15/2009
Detection
4 Types:
4
6/15/2009
5 Why Analysis
5
6/15/2009
5 Why Analysis
1st level: We lost the battle last week. The horseshoe did not have enough
Why did we lose the battle? nails in it (root cause).
6
6/15/2009
5 Why Analysis
7
6/15/2009
5 Why Analysis
8
6/15/2009
Three-legged 5 Why Analysis
Specific Detection
Business Process
9
6/15/2009
The Kingdom and the Nail
10
6/15/2009
The Kingdom and the Nail
11
6/15/2009
The Kingdom and the Nail
Result
12
6/15/2009
3 Leg 5 Why Analysis Template
13
6/15/2009
Engine Ticking Noise @ 600 RPM
14
6/15/2009
Engine Ticking Noise @ 600 RPM
Result
Clearance issue on
the assemblies
was not detected
in the test lab
Current validation
test passed
Why?
without detecting
noise
Test spec of 800 RPM
Why?
is different than what
is occurring in the
field (600 rpm)
Test spec is
Why?
carry over from
prior model
years
Root Cause
15
6/15/2009
Engine Ticking Noise @ 600 RPM
Result
The 600 RPM test
specification did
not exist
Project planning changed the
Why? requirements from the
original plan due to a change
in CAF standards, but the
changes were not
communicated to engineering
lab personnel
The change
process is
Why?
manual and
inefficient
Root Cause
16
6/15/2009
3-Legged-5-Why (3L5Y)
3-Legged-5-Whys (3L5Y) Approach
Approach for for
Product
Product Development
Development Issues Issues
DV PV S0 S1
Systemic Leg
Analysis of 32 Black Belt Projects System FMEA
18
20
16
14
Occurances
12
15
10
8
Count
6
10
4
2
5 0
re
d re ed te er
e ilu rm ua th
s id Fa fo de
q O
0 n n er tA
Co ct
io t P
n R er t e No No
EA
at
io CN EA P& th No et g
FM FM O
de lD PM in
if c st
V
i nt D o o
To Te
m ec
te ne M
s Sp re
Sy ce mp
o
ilu en
vi Fa ok
De Co Br
Count 20 4 3 3 1 1 Count 16 1 1 1 1
Percent 62.5 12.5 9.4 9.4 3.1 3.1 Percent 80.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Cum % 62.5 75.0 84.4 93.8 96.9 100.0 Cum % 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 100.0
18
6/15/2009
Driving Excellence
19
6/15/2009
Thank You!
Any
Questions?
20
6/15/2009