Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT: With his knowledge of spatial geometry, shell theory and manufacturing processes, the structural engineer is able to further
develop light and transparent glass roofs. They are attractive from an architectural as well as climatical point of view. Having already been
the symbol of the new architecture of the Industrial Revolution during the 18th and 19th century, they experienced a revival during the second
half of this century through the work of pioneers like Walther Bauersfeld, Konrad Wachsmann, Buckminster Fuller, Max Mengeringhausen,
Frei Otto and others. In the paper the authors will describe some transparent glass roofs designed by their team with emphasis on form
finding and manufacture.
GRID SHELLS
The appeal of glass domes grows with their translucence.
Double-curved grid shells with triangular mesh offer favourable
prerequisites for optimum transparency. Only the triangular mesh
enables the membrane forces to basically flow only in the plane with
almost no bending stress in the slats, a necessity for single-layer
membrane shells.
We have obviously solved the first two problems with our grid shells
by fabricating the base grid of the structure from a quadrangular
mesh made of slats, square if laid flat on the ground. This plane mesh
can assume almost any shape by modifying the original 90° mesh
angle. The squares become rhombi.
Due to the asymmetric barrel shape of the roof for the spa in Bad
Cannstatt, the spoked wheels had to be asymmetrical as well. In the
case of the WTC in Dresden pretensioned cable trusses were applied
(Figs. 7 and 8).
Fig. 10
Fig. 9:
Fig. 11: Protective roof for the ancient Roman hot springs in
Badenweiler (Architects: Hochbauamt Freiburg)
The protective roof for the ancient Roman hot springs in Badenweiler
(Fig. 11) is also a barrel dome with individual supports at the lower
edges in 6 resp. 7 m intervals. It spans 36 resp. 40 m and is 68 m
long. A crescent-shaped cable with ascending and descending
catenaries provides the transversal stiffening.
Fig. 11
The canopy covering the ruins of the ancient Roman public bath in
Badenweiler called for lightweight structures. The front of this
In the case of the flat roof over the company restaurant in building A50
at the Audi-plant in Ingolstadt (completed in 2000) the cables were
placed on the outside. The result is a suspension-bridge type roof. Its
barrel-vault-type steel grid is back-anchored across nine spatially curved
cable systems and masts (Fig. 23).
Free shapes like this can only be glazed with triangles and made from a
triangular grid. The shell structure is not continuously supported at its
edges, but only at 16 m intervals. Due to the small longitudinal
curvature, the shell had to be additionally stiffened by spoked wheels
(Fig. 27). The entire structure is made of stainless steel. The nodes were
milled three-dimensionally.
Fig. 33: Glass roof for the Hippo House at the Berlin Zoo. (Architect: J.
Griebl, München)
_______________________________________________________
1
) J. Schlaich, Emeritus Professor University of Stuttgart and partner of
Fig. 34: Roof over the courtyard of the Bosch Areal. Grid shell as
Schlaich Bergermann und Partner, Consulting Engineers,
translational surface with plane meshes. (Architect: Prof. Ostertag,
Hohenzollernstr. 1, D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany
Stuttgart). 2
) H. Schober, partner of Schlaich Bergermann und Partner, Consulting
Engineers, Hohenzollernstr. 1, D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany
ABSTRACT: A current trend in Architecture is towards maximum transparency. This counts not only for the cladding and glazing of building but, if
possible, also for the structure. In order to obtain transparant building materials a research program [1] has been started in Delft towards the design of
a new laminated glass/polymer sandwich composite material. Optimal combination of the ductile polymer and the strengthened glass which is strong
but brittle leads to a composite that is strong and ductile.
In this research project several graduation students participate, each with a different subject of interest. One of them has investigated the possibilities
of the new composite to construct a dome. Fig 1. Load bearing elements of glass are allways combined with steel components in order to provide
stability and ductile behaviour of the structure. In this study it was tried to design a dome without any steel added to it. The double curvature of the
shell combined with the ductile behaviour of the glass/polymer sandwich should do the job.
Fig. 2 Four types of shells, with the typical stresses under vertical load. a: sphere, b: ellipsoid, c: cycloid, d: paraboloid
The radius at the bottom was kept at a constant value of 10 meter, due to 5. FORMS AND SHAPE OF THE GLASS ELEMENTS
the design of the concertroom.
The influence of the variation in radius at the top and near the bottom of
the four forms was a criterion. Possibilities for production and
construction were also observed.
6. LOADINGS
8. JOINTS
The joints were designed using the stresses due to asymmetric loading,
with the top of the shell unloaded and the lower parts of the shell loaded
with snow. The resultant stresses were applied on four elements of the
shell held together by one joint. So the stresses in the joint could be
calculated.
For the design of the joint there are several principles, Fig 7.
1. Line joint
2. Point joint
3. Fully fixed
Fig. 5b, stresses self weight, small (1m) elements 4. Hinged
9. SUPPORTS
The supports of the shell structure were designed using a maximum vertical
displacement of 1 mm. This dictated the stiffness of the edge beam and the
number of supports for it.
The value of 1 mm was derived from calculations in which the displacements
of the shell were coMPared with the acceptable stresses.
The design of the opera house led to a column distance of 3.5 meter for the
Fig. 8 Three forms of joints, ring, square, cross edge beam. For the edge beam an ordinary HE beam was chosen: HE1000A.
If the form of the edge beam should be designed other than an I shape the
The ring and square type of joints transfer the forces from one element bending stiffness of that beam should be the same.
to the adjacent element, wereas the cross type of joint transfers the To support the circular shaped hollow section of the shell an arch was
forces to all three other elements. designed in the shape of a sickle with a tension rod. The supports are shown
So the choice fell to the cross type joint, Fig 9. in Fig 11.
The dimensions of the joint were determined by the strength, the case of
on site of assembly of the connection, and the filling of the joints
between two elements.
The contact surface between the connection and the glass was
determined by the forces that should be transferred and the strength of
the adhesive. The width of the joint was set to 25 mm, taking into
account the tolerances caused by the the bending and cutting proces of
the glass elements and by the construction. For the glue an epoxy resin
was chosen, because the ability of filling the gap between the flat
surface of the connection foot and the curved surface of the glass
element.
Also the good performance under maritimal conditions and the cold
conditions in Oslo of epoxy resin, made it a good choice.
10. CONCLUSIONS
- A full glass dome with a span of 23 meter could be realised. The
dimensions of the shell elements and of the steelconnections between
them are realistic. The stresses and strains are acceptable for the
materials used.
- In the course of the graduating process a choice for epoxy resin as adhesive
to be used for laminating the glass elements and for the connection between
them. Further investigation towards a better material is necessary.
- The building of a prototype could not be performed due to lack of time
but should be carried out by an other graduate student. This will give
more insight in the behaviour of the shell as a whole and of its
Fig 9 the cross shaped connection components.
- The problem of progressive collapse should be examined in more detail,
also using scale models.
11. LITERATURE
[1] F.A. Veer, M.A.C. van Liebergen, S.M. Benedictus-De Vries:
Designing and engineering transparent building components with high
residual strength. 5th glass processing days, Finland 1997
[2] C.B.Wilby: Concrete Dome Roofs, Longman Scientific & Technical, 1993
[3] G.J. Hobbelman, G.P.A.G. van Zijl, C.N. Ting: A new structural
material by architectural demand, Structural Engineering, Mechanics
and Computation, ed. A. Zingoni, Elsevier, 455-462.
[4] C.J.J. Vreedenburgh, J.G. Bouwkamp: Axiaalsymmetrische Schalen
[5] T.H.Hsu, Volume 4: Shells, Gulf publishing Company, 1991.
[6] P.Csonka, Theory and Practice of Membrane Shells, VDI Verlag, 1987.
1) G.J. Hobbelman, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture,
ABSTRACT: Contemporary architects seem to strive constantly for more transparency in their designs. Even the primary load-bearing
building structure can be made of glass. Because of the slenderness of their cross-section, glass beams tend to collapse due to lateral torsional
buckling. The critical buckling load is far below the theoretical critical load under simple in-plane bending. We examined the effectiveness
of horizontal supports of the upper “flange” in order to avoid the negative effects of torsion in the beam. The dependency of the load-bearing
capacity on the lateral restraint of the supported upper “flange” is examined numerically. Both continuous and point-like, elastic lateral
supports along the upper fibres are examined. It is shown that the load-bearing capacity can be considerably increased by preventing the
upper fibres of the beam from moving out of the beam’s plane. Conclusions are drawn on the efficiency of the different flange supporting
concepts and on the strength requirements needed for realising efficient connections, able to prevent torsion. The results of this study provide
useful data for a conceptual optimisation of the load-bearing capacity of glass beams and for the design of “flange” supporting connections.
Key words: glass, beams, transparency, lateral torsional buckling, experiment, analysis
load factor O
is the factor by which the basic loads (as determined in the previous
paragraph) must be multiplied to determine the total load on the beam. 0.6
The loads are supposed to stay vertical during the deformation of the
beam.
0.4
5.3. Uniformly distributed load p=60N/mm
Three main cases with different boundary conditions are used, as
illustrate by Fig 3.
0.2
The first case represents the beam, supported by a fork bearing at each
end and by lateral springs at the compressed rim. It represents for
example a simply supported glass beam which has its compressed upper
rim silicon glued to a glass roof plate. The roof structure itself is 0.0
supposed to be very stiff in its plane and flexible in the direction 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
spring stiffness k (kN/cm)
perpendicular to its plane.
U nifo rmly distributed lo ad - case 1
Y C o ncentrated lo ad - case 2
X Case 2,5
Lo ading type 4 - case 2