Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

All India Senior Secondary School Certificate

Examination [AISSCE-2013-14]

Physics Project Report : Investigatory

Project title : Photoelectric Effect

Project Report on Photoelectric Effect

Introduction to the Project Report :

Comparing the mass of the electron with the mass of ionised hydrogen atom
(proton) we see that it is lighter by a factor of 1836. This indicates that
electrons are easier to accelarate than ions.

Availability of loosely bound electrons (are actually unbound) in atoms of


metals is responsible for their high electrical conductivity. Within a solid piece
of substance like lithium, atoms are closely packed and, therefore, the loosely
bound electrons of each atom are easily moved from the influence of their
nucleus to that of their neighbour. Such loosely bound electrons are called
free electrons. Free electrons are held inside the metals by attractive forces at
their surface and require a minimum amount of energy, called the work
function of the metal, for their escape. This minimum energy can be supplied
to the free electrons in the metal for their release from the metal surface by
anyone of the following physical processes :

(a) Thermo ionic emission : by heating the metal sufficient thermal energy
can be given to free electrons to overcome the attractive pull of the metal
surface.

(b) Field emission : electrons can be extracted from metals by applying an


electric field.

(c) Photoelectric emission : by shining light of high frequency (ultraviolet) on


clean metal surfaces electrons from inside the metal can be released.

We shall next study the photoelectric effect. Einstein explained it on the basis
of Max Plancks Quantam idea. This laid the foundation of the Quantam
theory. Therefore, the photoelectric effect is of special interest.

Photoelectric Effect
Hallwach discovered that an insulated zinc plate connected to a gold leaf
electroscope and charged negatively losts its charge, when a beam of
ultraviolet light was directed on the plate. Hallwach suggested that the metal
surface loses negative charge due to ejection of electrons from its surface by
the ultraviolet light. The effect was termed as Photoelectric effect. The
electrons so emitted were called Photoelectrons. J.J.Thomson showed that
the Photoelectrons were not different from the ordinary electrons.

Thus, the phenomenon of ejection of electrons from a metal surface, when


light of sufficiently high frequency falls upon it is known as the photoelectric
effect.

Experimental Study
The phenomenon of photoelectric effect is studied by using an experimental
arrangement shown in figure 1.

Monochromatic light of known frequency is focussed on the anode of an


evacuated quartz tube. The anode is made out of the metal whose behaviour
under exposure to light is being investigated. Flow of current in the external
circuit indicates the flow of electrons emitted from the anode surface inside
the tube. This is possible if the electrons are emitted with energy large enough
to overcome the retarding potential between the anode and the cathode.

Explanation 1 : Free electrons in the metallic anode can absorb energy from
the electromagnetic waves impinging on them. After sufficient energy has
been absorbed free electrons inside the metal should be able to overcome the
combined potential barrier offered by the metal surface and the retarding
potential across the phototube.

Now, when the photocurrent is measured by varying (a) the intensity of light,
(b) its frequency and (c) the retarding potential between the anode and the
cathode, effects are observed which cannot be reconciled with the classical
wave properties of light and its absorption by electrons.

Hence explanation 1 is not accepted.

The maximum kinetic energy with which the electrons leave the anode can be
measured by adjusting the retarding potential till the photocurrent in the
external circuit is reduced to zero. Then electrons are not able to reach the
anode. If V is the cut-off voltage, the maximum kinetic energy of electrons in
the phototube is eV.
When a careful study is made of photoemission by varying the above
mentioned parameters in the experiment, the following important conclusions
are reached :

(i) The energy distribution of the emitted electrons is independent of the


intensity of the light. That is, more photoelectrons are emitted if the intensity of
the light is increased but the maximum kinetic energy with which the electrons
leave the metal remains unchanged. Infact, even with light of very low
intensity some electrons with the same kinetic energy are emitted.

(ii) With in the limit of experimental accuracy it is observed that there is no


time lag between the arrival of light at the metal and the emission of
photoelectrons. The delay has been experimentally measured. The delay time
has been found less than 10-9s.

(iii) For a given metal, photoelectrons are not emitted if the incident light is of
frequency less than a critical value, called the threshold frequency, no matter
how high its intensity.

(iv) The maximum kinetic energy with which photoelectrons are emitted from a
particular metal and the frequency of the incident light are related linearly. The
relation can be expressed as :

KEmax = h (-o) ---------- (1)

As the kinetic energy of electrons cannot be negative, photoemission does not


takes place when the frequency of the incident light is less than o. Although
the threshold frequency o changes from metal to metal, the slope of the
straight line.
eV = h (-o), ------------ (2)

Where is the magnitude of the cut-off voltage, is the same.

Millikan also has the credit of making the first accurate measurement of cut-off
voltages for sodium metal by using monochromatic light of known frequencies.
He published the graph of photocurrent versus voltage and the graph of cut-
off voltage versus frequency of light. We can estimate the slope of the straight

line. It is

By multiplying it with the charge of an electron, which is the fundamental


charge (of an electron), e=1.602 x 10-19 C;

We get,

h = 4.124 x 1.602 x 10-15 x 10-19

= 6.6 x 10-34 Js.

The Photon :

Einstein took Plancks idea of the quantam of energy seriously and proposed
that a monochromatic electromagnetic wave of frequency consists of discrete
quanta each having energy

E = h ---- (3)

Where h is the Planck constant. The quanta of light were appropriately called
photons. Each photon travels with the velocity of light. According to Einsteins
special theory of relativity energy, E and momentum, p of particles moving
with the speed of light are related

E = pc ---- (4).

Where c is the speed of light.

Comparing eqs (3) and (4), the momentum of the photon is seen to be related
to the wavelength of light as

----- (5)

Where is the wavelength of the light.

Quantum Interpretation :

Explanation 2 : Einstein suggested that absorption of energy from a photon by


a free electron inside the metal is a single event and involves transfer of
energy in one lump instead of continuous absorption of energy as in the wave
model of light. Energy is conserved in the process. It can be expressed by the
relation.

Energy of the incident photon = maximum.

Kinetic energy of the electron + work

Function of the metal. ------ (6).

The kinetic energy of the emitted electron will be maximum if the free electron,
which is released from the atom belongs to the group which has the maximum
energy inside the metal. By using the Einstein relation for the energy of
photons of frequency , we can write the photoelectric emission equation, eq
(6) as

-------- (7)

Let the work function be expressed in units of frequency such that

Work function = o -------- (8)

Then the Einstein photoelectric equation, eq (7), can be re-expressed as

KEmax = h (-o) -------- (9)

This equation is identical to the experimentally observed relationship given by


eq. (1).

Hence, explanation 2 is accepted and Einstein received the Nobel Prize in


physics in the year 1921 for the quantam theory of the photoelectric effect.
This lead to the particle behaviour of light.

Particle Nature of Light :

Arthur Holly Compton investigated the scattering of monochromatic X-rays


from electrons. He observed that the scattered X-rays had longer wavelength.
The change in wavelength was found to be independent of the matter used for
scattering but varies with the angle between the incident and the scattered
rays. Compton could explained the effect observed by him by assigning
momentum of magnitude h/c to photons of energy h. The elastic scattering
of a photon from an electron at rest can be worked out by involving the
principles of conservation of energy and conservation of momentum. The
formula giving the change of wavelength of the X-ray photon is

Where is the angle of scattering of the X-rays photon and m is the mass of
electron.

The elastic process is shown diagrammatically. The recoil electrons were


observed in Wilsons cloud chamber. Wilson shared the 1927 Nobel prize in
physics with Compton.

Photocell - A Technological Application :

The design of a photocell makes use of photo-emission from a metal surface


for measuring the intensity of light. The photoelectrons emitted from the
cathode of the photocell are drawn to the collector by an electric field. The
resultant electric current is measured by a sensitive meter in the external
circuit. The current obtainable from a typical photocell is of the order of a
microampere.

The fundamental use of a photocell is to convert a change in the intensity of


illumination into a change in electric current. This change in electric current
may be used to operate controls and in light measuring devices. For example,
a person approaching a door way may interrupt a light beam which is incident
upon a photo cell. The abrupt change in photocurrent may be used to start a
motor which opens the door or rings an alarm. Light meters in cameras work
on this principle.
Conclusion

As we appreciated the simplicity and elegance of Einsteins explanation of


photoelectric effect we came to know about the particle behaviour of light. He
introduced revolutionary ideas which were contrary to the scientific opinion of
the time. The photon hypothesis disturbed the scientific community much
more than the seventeenth century Newton - Huygens heated debate on the
corpuscular and the wave nature of light. But the new theory gave a better
description of the physical nature than the comfortable old classical ideas.

Hence, the world came to know about the dual nature of light. That is, a
monochromatic beam of light of frequency , hence possessing wave
attributes, manifests in some experiments as though it is a stream of quanta
called photons.

Bibliography

www.google.com
www.wiki.com
www.yahoo.com

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen