IN 'I HE UNITED S'I'A'I'I;"S J)ISTRICT COURT

I oit Titr DISTRICT Or Col,t! MIJIA

I fNI'I'LD STATES OF AMFRICA

CRIMINAl. NO.

(18 U.S,C, g 2, 371, 981(a)(I)(C), 082,

1001(a), 1056(h), and 3551 ct scqd 22
1'A IJ I,.I. MANA FORT, IR. and U.S.C. JJ) 612(a), 618(a)(1), and
RI('I IARD W. (IATES III, 618(a)(2); 28 U.S.C. It 2461(c) I 31 I I.S.C.
I' ll' ,5314 utd 5322(b))
Defi. ndants.

INDICTM IINT

'I hc (trend Jury for the District of Columbia charges: Case: 1:17
cr-00201
Assigned To . Judge Jackson, Amy Berman
Introduction Assign. Date: 10/27/201 7
Description INDICTMENT (B)
At al 1 times relevant to this Indictment:

l. Dcf c ndants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., (MANAIr(>8:I) and RICHARD W. (rA'I'ES tll

((rATES) served for years as political consultants and lobbyists Bctwcc al. least 2006 and 2015,

MANAFOR'I' and (IA'f ES acted as unrcgistcred agents ot'thc Govct'lltllcnt of Ilkraine, ttte Ptuty

of Regions (a Ukrainian poJilical party whose leader Victor Yaukovych was I'resident front 201(l

to 2014), Yanuhoyych, and the Opposition Bloc (a successor to the Patty of Regions that framed

in 2014 when Yanukovych fled to Russia). MANAFORT and GATES generated tens of millions

of dollars in incotne as a result of their Ukraine work. In order to hide l.!kraine payrents fron;

United States authoritics, from approxitnatcly 2006 through at least 2016, lvIANAFOR'I' and

(lh'I ES laundered thc money through scores oi' United States and foreign corporations,

pattncrships, and hank accounts.

2. In f u r therance of the scheme, MANAFORT and GATES funneled millions of dollars in

payments into foreign nominee companies and bank accounts, opened by them and their

accomplices in nominee names and in various foreign countries, including Cyprus, Saint Vincent

& the Grenadines (Grenadines), and the Seychelles. MANAFORT and GATES hid the existence

of the foreign companies and bank accounts, falsely and repeatedly reporting to their tax preparers

and to the United States that they had no foreign bank accounts,

3, In f u r therance of the scheme, MANAFORT and GATES concealed from the United States

their work as agents of, and millions of dollars in payments from, Ukraine and its political parties

and leaders. Because MANAFORT and GATES, among other things, directed a campaign to

lobby United States officials on behalf of the Government of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine,

and Ukrainian political parties, they were required by law to report to the United States their work

and fees. MANAFORT and GATES didnotdo so, Instead, whentheDepartmentof Justice sent

inquiries to MANAFORT and GATES in 2016 about their activities, MANAFORT and GATES

responded with a series of false and misleading statements.

4, I n f ur t h erance of the scheme, MANAFORT used his hidden overseas wealth to enjoy a

lavish lifestyle in the United States, without paying taxes on that income. MANAFORT, without

reporting the income to his tax preparer or the United States, spent millions of dollars on luxury

goods andservices for himself and his extended. family through payments wired from offshore

nominee accounts to United States vendors. MA N A F ORT also used these offshore accounts to

purchase multi-million dollar properties in the United States. MANAFORT then borrowed

millions of dollars in loans using these properties as collateral, thereby obtaining cash in the United

States without reporting and paying taxes on the income. In order to increase the amount of money

he could access in the United States, MANAFORT defrauded the institutions that loaned money
on these properties so that they would lend him more money at more favorable rates than he would

otherwise be able to obtain.

5. GA T E S aided MANAFORT in obtaining money from these offshore accounts, which he

was instrumental in opening. Like MANAFORT, GATES used money from these offshore

accounts to pay for his personal expenses, including his mortgage, children's tuition, and interior

decorating of his Virginia residence.

6, In t o t al, more than $75,000,000 flowed through the offshore accounts. MANAFORT

launderedmore than $18,000,000, which was used by him to buy property,goods, and services in

the United States, income that he concealed from the United States Treasury, the Department of

Justice,
and others. GATES transferred more than $3,000,000 from the offshore accounts to other

accounts that he controlled.

Relevant Individuals And Entities

7. MANA F ORT was a United States citizen, He resided in homes in Virginia, Florida, and

Long Island, New York.

8. GA T E S was a United States citizen. He resided in Virginia.

9. In 2 0 05, MANAFORT and another partner created Davis Manafort Partners, Inc. (DMP) to

engage principally in political consulting. DMP had staff in the United States, Ukraine, and

Russia. In 2011, MANAFORT created DMP International, LLC (DMI) to engage in work for

foreign clients, in particular political consulting, lobbying,

and public relations for the Government

of Ukraine,the Party of Regions, and members of the Party of Regions. DMI was a partnership

solely owned by MANAFORT and his spouse. GATES worked for both DMP and DMI and

served as MANAFORT's right-hand man,

10. T h e Party of Regions was a pro-Russia political party in Ukraine. B e ginning in

approximately 2006, it retained ~ A FOR T , through DMP and then DMI, to advance its

interests in Ukraine, including the election of its slate of candidates, In 2010, its candidate for

President, Yanukovych, was elected President of Ukraine. In 2014, Yanukovych fled Ukraine for

Russia in the wake of popular protests of widespread governmental corruption. Yanukovych, the

Party of Regions, and the Government of Ukraine were MANAFORT, DMP, and DMI clients.

11. T h e European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (the Centre) was created in or about 2012 in

Belgium as amouthpiece
for Yanukovych and the Party of Regions, The Centre was used by

MANAFORT, GATES, and others in order to lobby and conduct a public relations campaign in

the United States and Europe on behalf of the existing Ukraine regime. The Centre effectively

ceased to operate upon the downfall of Yanukovych in 2014.

12. M A N A FORT and GATES owned or controlled the following entities, which were used in

the scheme (the MANAFORT-GATES entities);

Domestic Entities

Kritity Name . Date Created IncorporationLocation

Bade LLC (RG) January 2012 Delaware

August 2008 Virginia

Daisy Manafort, LLC (PM)
March 2011 Florida

Davis Manafort International LLC March 2007 Delaware

(PM)
March 2005 Virginia
DMP (PM)
March 2011 Florida

October 1999 Delaware

Davis Manafort, Inc. (PM)
November 1999 Virginia
Kntity Kame Date Created IncorporationLocation

June 2011 Delaware

DMI (PM)
March 2012 Florida

Global Sites LLC (PM, RG) July 2008 Delaware

Jemina LLC (RG) July 2008 Delaware

Jesand Investment Corporation (PM) April 2002 Virginia

Jesand Investments Corporation (PM) March 2011 Florida

April 2006 Virginia

John Hannah, LLC (PM)
March 2011 Florida

Jupiter Holdings Management, LLC January 2011 Delaware

(RG)
Lilred, LLC (PM) December 2011 Florida

LOAV Ltd. (PM) April 1992 Delaware

MC Brooklyn Holdings, LLC (PM) November 2012 New York

January 2012 Florida

MC Soho Holdings, LLC (PM)
April 2012 New York

Smythson LLC (also known as July 2008 Delaware

Symthson LLC) (PM, RG)

C r i o t Entities

Entity Name Date Created Incorporation Location

Actinet Trading Limited (PM, RG) May 2009 Cyprus

Black Sea View Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus

 Entity Name Bate Created Incorpo
ration Location
Bletilla Ventures Limited (PM, RG) October 2010 Cyprus

Cavenari Investments Limited (RG) December 2007 Cyprus

Global Highway Limited (PM, RG} August 2007 Cyprus

Leviathan Advisors Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus

LOAV Advisors Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus

Lucicle Consultants Limited (PM, RG) December 2008 Cyprus

Marziola Holdings Limited (PM) March 2012 Cyprus

Olivenia Trading Limited (PM, RG) March 2012 Cyprus

Peranova Holdings Limited (PM, RG) June 2007 Cyprus

Serangon Holdings Limited (PM, RG) January 2008 Cyprus

Other Forei n Entities

Entity Name Date Created Incorporation Location

Global Endeavour Inc. (also known as Unknown Grenadines

Global Endeavor Inc.) (PM)

Jeunet Ltd, (PM) August 2011 Grenadines

Pompolo Limited (RG) April 2013 Umted Kingdom

13, T h e Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was a bureau in the United States Department of the

Treasury responsible for administering the tax laws of the United States and collecting taxes owed

to the Treasury.
 The Scheme

14. B e tween in or around 2008 and 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, in the

District of Columbia and elsewhere, MANAFORT and GATES devised and intended to devise,

and executed and attempted to execute, a scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and

property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises from the United

States, banks, and other financial institutions, As part of the scheme, MANAFORT and GATES

repeatedly provided false information to financial bookkeepers, tax accountants, and legal counsel,

among others.

MANAFORT And GATES' Wirin O f M on e F r om Offshore Accounts Into The United States

15, I n o r der to use the money in the offshore nominee accounts of the MANAFORT-GATES

entities without paying taxes on it, MANAFORT and GATES caused millions of dollars in wire

transfers from these accounts to be made for goods, services, and real estate. They did not report

these transfers as income to DMP, DMI, or MANA FORT.

16. F r om 2008 to 2014, MANAFORT caused the following wires, totaling over $12,000,000,

to be sent to the vendors listed below for personal items, MANAFORT did not pay taxes on this

income, which was used to make the purchases.

Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of

Payee
Date Holder Origination Transaction
Vendor A 6/10/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $107,000
(Home 6/25/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $23,500
Improvement 7/7/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $20,000
Company in the 8/5/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $59,000
Hamptons, New 9/2/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited $272,000
York) 10/6/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $109,000
 Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of
Payee
Bate Holder Origination Transaction
10/24/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $107,800
11/20/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $77,400
12/22/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited $100,000
1/14/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $9,2SO
1/29/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $97,670
2/25/2G09 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $108,100
4/16/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $94,394
5/7/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $54,000
5/12/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $9,550
6/1/2009 Yiakora Ventures Linuted Cyprus $86,650
6/18/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $34,400
7/31/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $106,000
8/28/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $37,000
9/23/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $203,500
1G/26/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited $38,800
11/18/2009 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $130,906
3/8/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $124,000
5/11/20] 0 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $25,000
7/8/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $28,000
7/23/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $26,500
8/12/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $138,900
9/2/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $31,500
10/6/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $67,600
10/14/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $107,600
10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $31,500
12/16/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $46,160
2/7/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $36,500
3/22/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $26,800
4/4/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $195,000
5/3/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $95,000
5/16/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $6,SOO
5/31/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $70,000
6/27/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $39,900
7/27/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $95,000
10/24/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $22,000
10/25/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $9,300
11/15/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $74,000
11/23/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $22,300
 Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of
Payee
Date Holder Origination Transaction
11/29/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $6,100
12/12/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $17,800
I/17/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $29,800
1/20/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $42,600
2/9/2012 GlobalHighway Limited Cyprus $22,300
2/23/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $75,000
2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $22,300
3/28/2012 Peranova Holdings Limited Cyprus $37,500
4/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $50,000
5/15/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $79,000
6/5/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $45,000
6/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $11,860
7/9/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $10,800
7/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $88,000
8/7/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $48,800
9/27/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $100,000
11/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $298,000
12/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $55,000
1/29/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $149,000
3/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $375,000
8/29/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $200,000
11/13/2013 Global Endeavour Inc, Grenadines $75,000
11/26/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $80,000
12/6/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $130,000
12/12/2013 GlobalEndeavour Inc. Grenadines $90,000
4/22/2014 Unknown Unknown $56,293
8/18/2014 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $34,660
endor A Total $5,434,793
Vendor 8 3/22/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000
(Home 3/28/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $25,000
Automation, 4/27/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000
Lighting and 5/16/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $25,000
Home 11/15/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $17,006
Entertainment
11/23/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $11,000
Companyi n
2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $6,200
Florida)
10/31/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $290,000
12/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited $160,600
1/15/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $194,000
 Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of
Bate: Holder Origination Transaction
1/24/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $6,300
2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $51,600
2!26/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $260,000
United
7/15/2013 Pompolo Limited $175,575
Kingdom
11/5/2G13 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $73,000
Vendor 8 Total $1,319,281
Vendor C 10/7/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $15,750
{Antique Rug 3/17/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $46,200
Store in 4/16/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited C ~l u s $7,400
Alexandria, 4/27/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $65,000
Virginia) 5/7/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $210,000
7/15/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $200,000
3/31/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $140,G00
6/16/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $250,000
ndor C Total $934,350
Vendor B
{Related to 2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $100,000
Vendor C)
Ve ndor D Total $100,000
Vendor E 11/7/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $32,000
{Men's Clothing 2/5/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $22,750
Store in New 4/27/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $13,500
York) 10/26/20G9 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $32,500
3/30/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $1S,OOO
5/11/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $39,000
6/28/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $S,OOG
8/12/2G1G Leviathan Advisors Limited, Cyprus $32,500
11/17/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $11,SOO
2/7/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $24,000
3/22/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited $43,600
3/28/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000
4/27/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $3,000
6/30/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $24,50G
9/26/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000
11/2/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $26,700
12/12/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $46,000
2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $2,800
 Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of
Payee
Date Holder Origination Transaction
2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $16,O0O
3/1 4/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $8,000
4/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $48,550
5/15/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,000
6/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $21,600
8/7/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $15,500
11/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $10,900
12/20/2012 Lucicle Constdtants Limited Cyprus $7,500
1/15/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $37,000
2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,000
2/26/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $39,000
9/3/2013 GlobalEndeavour Inc, Grenadines $81,500
10/ I 5/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $53,000
11/26/2013 Global Endeavour Inc, Grenadines $13,200
4/24/2014 Global Endeavor Inc. Unknown $26,680
9/11/2014 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $58,435
endor E Total $849,215
Vendor F 4/27/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $34,000
(Landscaper in 5/12/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $45,700
the Hamptons, 6/1/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,500
New York) 6/18/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $29,000
9/21/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,800
5/11/20 1 0 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $44,O0O
6/28/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $50,000
7/23/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $19,000
9/2/20 10 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,000
10/6/20 1 0 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $57,700
10/18/20 1 0 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $26,000
12/16/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $20,000
3/22/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $50,000
5/3/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $40,000
6/1/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $44,000
7/27/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $27,000
8/16/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $13,450
9/19/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12;000
10/24/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $42,000
11/2/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $37,350
Vendor F Total $655,500
 Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of
Payee
Date HoMer Origination Transaction
Vendor G 9/2/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $165,000
(Antique Dealer 10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $165,000
in New York) 2!28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $190,600
3/14/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $75,000
2!26/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $28,310
Vendor G Total $623,910
Vendor H 6/25/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $52,000
(Clothing Store in 12/16/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $49,000
Beverly Hills, 12/22/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $10,260
California) 8/12/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $76,400
5/11/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $85,000
11/17/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $128,280
5!31/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $64,0GG
11/15/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $48,000
12/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,500
Vendor H Total $520,440
Vendor I
(Investment 9/3/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $500,000
Company)
endor I Total $500,000
Vendor J 11/15/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $8,0GO
(Contractor in 12/5/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited $11,237
Florida) 12/21/2011 Black Sea View Limited Cyprus $20,000
2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $51,000
5/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $68,0GO
6/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $60,000
7/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $32,250
9/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $112,000
11/30/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $39,700
1/9/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $25,600
2/28/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $4,7GO
endor J Total $432,487
Vendor K 12/5/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $4,115
(Landscaper in 3/1/2012 GlobalHighway Limited Cyprus $50,000
the Hamptons, 6/6/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $47,800
New York) 6/25/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $17,900
6/27/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $'1 8,900

12
 Transaction Originating Account Country of AHlount of
Payee
Date Holder Origination Transaction
2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $3,300
United
7/15/2013 Pompolo Limited $13,325
Kingdom
11/26/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $9,400
ndor K Total $164,740
Vendor L 4/12/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $83,525
(Payments 5/2/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $12,525
Relating to three
Range Rovers) 6/29/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $67,655

endor L Total $163,705

Vendor M 11/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $4S,OOO
(Contractor in 12/7/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $21,000
Virginia) 12/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $21,000
1/17/2G13 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $18,750
1/29/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited $9,400
2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $10,500
ndor M Total $125,650
Vendor 5 1/29/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $10,000
(Audio, Video, 3/17/2009 Yiakoxa Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,725
and Control 4/16/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $24,650
System Home 12/2/2009 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $10,000
integration and 3/8/2G10 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $20,300
installation
4/23/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $8,500
Company in the
Hamptons, New
7/29/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $17,650
York)

Vendor N Total $112,825

Vendor 0
(Purchase of 10/5/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $62,7SO
Mercedes Benz)

ndor 0 Total $62,750

Vendor P
(Purchase of 12/30/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $47,000
Range Rover)
Vendor P Total $4'7,000
Vendor Q 9/2/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $10,000
10/6/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $10,000
 Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of
Payee
Date Holder Origination Transaction
(Property 10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $10,000
Management 2/8/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $13,500
Company in
South Carolina) 2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $2,500

ndor Q Total $46,000

Vendor R 2/9/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $17,900
(Art Gallery in
Florida) 2/14/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $14,000

Vendor R Total $31,900

Vendor S 9/26/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited $S,O0O
(Housekeeping in 9/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $S,O0O
New York)
10/9/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $10,000

V endor S Total $20,0 0 0

17. I n 2012, MANAFORT caused the following wires to be sent to the entities listed below to

purchase the real estate also listed below. MANAFORT did not report the money used to make

these purchases on his 2012 tax return.

Property Payee Date

Originating Country of
Amount
Purchased Account Origin
Howard Street DMP
Peranova Holdings
Condo minion International 2/1/2012 Cyprus $1,500,000
Limited
(New York) LLC
Attorney Actinet Trading
Union Street 11/29/2012 Cyprus $1,800,000
Account Of Limited
Brownstone,
[Real Estate Actinet Trading
(New York) 11/29/2012 Cyprus $1,200,000
Attorney] Limited
~ Arlington
Real Estate Lucicle Consultants
I House 8/31/2012 Cyprus $1,900,000
Trust Limited
(Virginia)
MANAFORT And GATES' Hidin Of Ukraine Lobb in And Public Relations Work

18. I t is illegal to act as an agent of a foreign principal engaged in certain United States influence

activities without registering the affiliation, Specifically, a person who engages in lobbying or

public relations work in the United States (hereafter collectively referred to as lobbying) for a

foreign principal such as the Government of Ukraine or the Party of Regions is required to provide

a detailed written registration statement to the United States Department of Justice. The filing,

made under oath, must disclose the name of the foreign principal, the financial payments to the

lobbyist, and the measures undertaken for the foreign principal, among other information. A

person required to make such a filing must further make in all lobbying material a "conspicuous

statement" that the materials are distributed on behalf of the foreign principal, among other things.

The filing thus permits public awareness and evaluation of the activities of a lobbyist who acts as

an agent of a foreign power or foreign political party in the United States.

19. I n f urtherance of the scheme, from 2006 until 2014, both dates being approximate and

inclusive, MANAFORT and GATES engaged in a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign in the

United States at the direction of Yanukovych, the Party of Regions, and the Government of

Ukraine. MANAFORT and GATES did so without registering and providing the disclosures

required by law,

20. A s p art of the scheme, in February 2012, MANAFORT and GATES solicited two

Washington, D.C., firms (Company A and Company B) to lobby in the United States on behalf of

Yanukovych,the Party of Regions, and the Government of Ukraine. For instance, GATES wrote

to Company A that it would be "representing the Goveiiiinent of Ukraine in [Washington,] DC."

21. M A N A FORT repeatedly communicated in person and in writing with Yanukovych, and

15
GATES passed on directions to Company A and Company B. For instance, MANAFORT wrote

Y anukovych memorandum
a dated April 8,2012,in w hich he provided Yanukovych an update on

the lobbying firms' activities "since the inception of the project a few weeks ago. It is my intention

to provide you with a weekly update moving forward." Toward the end of that first year, in

November 2012, GATES wrote to Company A and Company B that the firms needed to prepare

an assessment of their past and prospective lobbying efforts so the "President" could be briefed by

"Paul" "on what Ukraine has done well and what it can do better as we move into 2013,"

22. A t the direction of MANAFORT and GATES, Company A and Company B engaged in

extensive lobbying. Among other things, they lobbied multiple Members of Congress and their

staffs about Ukraine sanctions, the validity of U k raine elections, and the propriety of

Yanukovych's imprisoning his presidential rival, Yulia Tymoshenko (who had served as Ukraine

President prior to Yanukovych), MANAFORT and GATES also lobbied in connection with the

roH out of a report concerning the Tymoshenko trial commissioned by the Government of Ukraine.

MANAFORT and GATES used one of their offshore accounts to funnel $4 miHion to pay secretly

for the report.

23. T o minimize public disclosure of their lobbying campaign, MANAFORT and GATES

arranged for the Centre to be the nominal client of Company A and Company B, even though in

fact the Centre was under the ultimate direction of the Government of Ukraine, Yanukovych, and

the Party of Regions. For instance, MANAFORT and GATES selected Company A and Company

B, and only thereafter did the Centre sign contracts with the lobbying firms without ever ineeting

either company, Company A and Company B were paid for their services not by their nominal

client, the Centre, but solely through off-shore accounts associated with the MANAFORT-GATES

entities, namely Bletilla Ventures Limited (in Cyprus) and Jeunet Ltd, and Global Endeavour Inc.

16
(in Grenadines). In total, Company A and Company B were paid more than $2 million &om these

accounts between 2012 and 2014,

24. T o conceal the scheme, MANAFORT and GATES developed a false and misleading cover

storythatwould distance themselves and the Government of Ukraine, Yanukovych, and the Party

of Regionsfrom the Centre, Company A, and Company B, For instance,in the wake of extensive

press reports on MANAFORT and his connections with Ukraine, on August 16, 2016, GATES

communicated false talking points to Company B in writing, including:

o Q: "Can you describe your initial contact with[Company B] and the lobbying goals

he discussed with them?" A: "We provided an introduction between the [Centre]

and [Company B/Company A] in 2012. T he [Centre] was seeking to retain

representation in Washington, DC to support the mission of the NGO."

A; "Our [MANAFORT and GATES'] task was to assist the [Centre] find

representation in Washington, but at no time did our firm or members provide any

direct lobbying support."

e A: "The structure of the arrangement between the [Centre] and [Company A and

Compa
nyB] was worked out by the two parties,"
e Q: "Can you say where the funding from for [sic] the [Centre] came from? (this

amounted to well over a million dollars between 2012 and 2014)." A: "This is a

question better asked of the [Centre] who contracted with the two firms."

Q: "Can you describe the lobbying work specifically undertaken by [Company Bj

on behalf of the Party of Regions/the [Centre]?" A: "This is a question better asked

to Company B and/or the [Centre] as the agreement was between the parties. Our

firm did not play a role in the structure, nor were we registered lobbyists."

17
Company B through a principal replied to GATES the same day that "there's a lot of email traffic

that has you much more involved than this suggests [.] We will not disclose that but heaven knows

what former employees of [Company B] or [Company Aj might say."

25. In S e ptember 2016, after numerous recent press reports concerning MANAFORT, the

Department of Justice informed MAN A FORT, GATES, and DMI that it sought to determine

whether they had acted as agents of a foreign principal under the Foreign Agents Registration Act

(FARA), without registering, In November 2016 and February 2017, MANAFORT, GATES, and

DMI caused false and misleading letters to be submitted to the Department of Justice, which

mirrored the false cover story set out above. T h e l etters, both of w hich were approved by

MANAFORT and GATES before they were submitted, represented, among other things, that:

DMI's "efforts on behalf of the Party of Regions" "did not include meetings or

outreach within the U.S.";

e MANAFORT and GATES did not "recall meeting with or conducting outreach

to U.S. governm
ent officials or U.S. media outlets on behalf of the [Centre], nor
do they r ecall b eing party t o , a r ranging, or f a cilitating any s uch

communications, Rather, it is the recollection and understanding of Messrs.

Gates and Manafort that such commimications would have been facilitated and

conducted by the [Centre's] U.S. consultants, as directed by the [Centre]....";

o M A N AFORT and GATES had merely served as a means of introduction of

Company A and Company B to the Centre and provided the Centre with a list

of "potential U.S,-based consultants including [Company A] and [Company

B] for the [Centre's] reference and further consideration."

DMI "does not retain communications beyond thirty days" and as a result of

18
 this policy, a "search has returned no responsive documents," The November

2016 letter attached a one-page, undated document that purported to be a DMI

"Email Retention Policy."

26. I n f act, MANAFORT and GATES had: selected Company A and Company B; engaged in

weekly scheduled calls and frequent emails with Company A and Company B to provide them

directions as to specific lobbying steps that should be taken; sought and received detailed oral and

written reports from these fiiTns on the lobbying work they had performed; communicated with

Yanukovych to brief him on their lobbying efforts; both congratulated and reprimanded Company

A and Company B on their lobbying work; communicated directly with United States officials in

connection with this work; and paid the lobbying firms over $2 million from offshore accounts

they controlled, among other things. In addition, court-authorized searches of MANAFORT and

GATES' DMI email accounts and MANAFORT's Virginia residence in July 2017 revealed

numerous documents, including documents related to lobbying, which were more than thirty-days

old at the time of the November 2016 letter to the Department of Justice.

~A PO R T And GATES' Hidin Of Forei B a nk Accounts And False Filin s

27. U n i ted States citizens who have authority over certain foreign bank accounts whether or

not the accounts are set up in the names of nominees who act for their principals have reporting

obligations to the United States.

28. F i r st, the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations require United States citizens

to repoit to the United States Treasury any financial interest in, or signatory authority over, any

bank account or other financial account held in foreign countries, for every calendar year in which

the aggregate balance of all such foreign accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point during the year,

19
This is commonly known as a foreign bank account report or "FBAR." The Bank Secrecy Act

requires these repoits because they have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory

investigations or proceedings. The United States Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement

Network (FinCEN) is the custodian for FBAR filings, and FinCEN provides access to its FBAR

database to law enforcement entities, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The reports

filed by individuals and businesses are used by Iaw enforcement to identify, detect, and deter

money laundering that furthers criminal enterprise activity, tax evasion, and other unlawful

activities.

29. S e c o nd, United States citizens also are obligated to report information to the IRS regarding

foreign bank accounts. For instance, in 2010 Form 1040, Schedule B had a "Yes" or "No" box to

record an answer to the question: "At any time during [the calendar year], did you have an interest

in or a signature or other authority over a financial account in a foreign country, such as a bank

account, securities account, or other financial account?" If the answer was "Yes," then the form

required the taxpayer to enter the name of the foreign country in which the financial account was

located.

30. F o r e ach year in or about and between 2008 tlirough at least 2014, MANAFORT had

authority over foreign accounts that required an FBAR report. Specifically, MANAFORT was

required to report to the United States Treasury each foreign bank account held by the foreign

MANAFORT-GATES entities noted above in paragraph 12 that bear the initials PM. No FBAR

reports were made by MANAFORT for these accounts.

31. F o r each year in or about and between 2008 through at least 2013, GATES had authority

over foreign accounts that required an FBAR report. Specifically, GATES was required to report

to the United States Treasury each foreign bank account held by the foreign MANAFORT-GATES

20
entities noted above in paragraph 12 that bear the initials RG, as well as three other accounts in

the United Kingdom. No FBAR reports were made by GATES for these accounts,

32. F i u thermore, in each of MANAFORT's tax filings for 2008 through 2014, MANAFORT

represented falsely that he did not have authority over any foreign bank accounts. MANAFORT

and GATES had repeatedly and falsely represented in writing to MANAFORT's tax preparer that

MANAFORT had n o a uthority over f oreign bank accounts, knowing that such false

representations would result in false MANAFORT tax filings. For instance, on October 4, 2011,

MANAFORT's tax preparer asked MANAFORT in writing: "At any time during 2010, did you

[or your wife or childrenj have an interest in or a signature or other authority over a financial

account in a f o r eign country, such as a bank account, securities account or other financial

account?" On the same day, MANAFORT falsely responded "NO." MANAFORT responded the

same way as recently as October 3, 2016, when MANAFORT's tax preparer again emailed the

question in connection with the preparation of MANAFORT's tax returns: "Foreign bank accounts

etc.?" MANAFORT responded on or about the same day: "NONE."

MANAFORT And GATES' Fraud To Increase Access To Offshore Mone

33. A f t er MANAFORT used his offshore accounts to purchase real estate in the United States,

he took out inortgages on the properties thereby allowing MANA FORT to have the benefits of

liquid income without paying taxes on it. Further, MANAFORT defrauded the banks that loaned

him the money so that he could withdraw more money at a cheaper rate than he otherwise would

have been perinitted.

34. I n 2 0 12, MANAFORT, through a corporate vehicle called "MC Soho Holdings, LLC"

owned by him and his family, bought a condominium on Howard Street in the Soho neighborhood

21
in Manhattan, New York. He paid approximately $2,850,000. All the money used to purchase

the condominium carne f'rom MANAFORT entities in Cyprus. MANAFORT used the property

from at least January 2015 through 2016 as an income-generating rental property, charging

thousands of dollars a week on Airbnb, among other places, In his tax returns, MANAFORT took

advantage of the beneficial tax consequences of owning this rental property,

35. I n late 2015 through early 2016, MANAFORT applied for a mortgage on the condominium.

Because the bank would permit a greater loan amount if the property were owner-occupied,

MANAFORT falsely represented to the bank and its agents that it was a secondary home used as

such by his daughter and son-in-law and was not a property held as a rental property. For instance,

on January 26, 2016, MANAFORT wrote to his son-in-law to advise him that when the bank

appraiser came to assess the condominium his son-in-law should "[r]emember, he believes that

you and [~ A FOR T ' s daughter] are living there." Based on a request &om MANAFORT,

GATES caused a document to be created which listed the Howard Street property as the second

home of MANAFORT's daughter and son-in-law, when GATES knew this fact to be false. As a

result of his false representations, in March 2016 the bank provided MANAFORT a loan for

approximately $3,185,000.

36. A l s o in 2012, MANAFORT -- through a corporate vehicle called "MC Brooklyn Holdings,

LLC" similarly owned by him and his family bought a brownstone on Union Street in the Carroll

G ardens sectionof Brooklyn, New York. He paid approximately $3,000,000 in cash for the

property, All of that money came from a ~ A PO R T entity in Cyprus, After purchase of the

property, MANAFORT began renovations to transform it &om a multi-family dwelling into a

single family home. In late 2015 through early 2016, MANAFORT sought to borrow cash against

the property. The institution MANAFORT went to for the loan provided greater loan amounts for

22
"construction loans" that is, loans that required the loan amounts to be used to pay solely for

construction of the property and thus increase the value of the property serving as the loan's

collateral. The institution would thus loan money against the expected completed value of the

property, which in the case of the Union Street property was estimated to be $8,000,000. In early

2016, MANAFORT was able to obtain a loan of approximately $S,000,000, after promising the

bank that approximately $1,400,000 of the loan would be used solely for construction of the Union

Street property. H o wever, MANAFORT never intended to limit use of the proceeds to

construction as required by the loan contracts. In December 2015, before the loan was made,

MANAFORT wrote his tax preparer, among others, that the construction loan "will allow me to

pay back the [another Manafott apartment] mortgage in full.... " Further, when the construction

loan closed, MANAFORT used hundreds of thousands of dollars from the construction loan to

make a down payment on another property in California,

Statuto A l l e a t ions

COUNT ONE
(Conspiracy Against The United States)

37. Paragraphs 1through 30 and 32 through 36 are incorporated here.

38. F r om in or about and between 2006 and 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive,

in the District of Cojumbia and elsewhere, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and

RICHARD W. GATES III, together with others, knowingly and intentionally conspired to defraud

the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful governmental

functions of a government agency, namely the Department of Justice and the Department of the

Treasury, and to commit offenses against the United States, to wit, the violations of law charged
in Counts Three through Six and Ten through Twelve.

39. I n f urtherance of the conspiracy and to effect its illegal object, MANAFORT and GATES

committed the overt acts noted in Count Eleven and the overt acts, among others, in the District of

Columbia andelsewhere as set forth in paragraphs 9, 16, 17, 20-25, 32, and 34-36, which are

incorporated herein.

(18 U.S.C. ) 371)

COUNT T%0
(Conspiracy To Launder Money)

40. P a ragraphs 1 through 30 and 32 through 36 are incorporated here,

41. I n o r around and between 2006 and 2016, both dates being approximate and inclusive,

within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendants PAUI. 3, MANAFORT, JR., and

MCHARD W. GATES III, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to:

(a) transport, transmit, and transfer monetary instnunents and funds from places outside

the United States to and through places in the United States and from places in the United

States to and through places outside the United States, with the intent to promote the

carrying on of specified unlawful activity, to wit: a felony violation of the FARA, in

violation of Title 22, United States Code, Sections 612 and 618(the "Specified Unlawful

Activity" ), contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(2)(A); and

(b) conduct financial transactions, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, knowing that

the property involved in the financial transactions would represent the proceeds of some

form of unlawful activity, and the transactions in fact would involve the proceeds of

Specified UnlawfLd Activity, knowing that such financial transactions were designed in

whole and in part (i) to engage in conduct constituting a violation of sections 7201 and
 7206 ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and (ii) to conceal and disguise the nature,

location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of the Specified Unlawful

Activity, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956 (a)(1)(A)(ii) and

1956(a)(1)(B)(i),

(18 U.S.C. g 1956(h))

COUNTS THREE THRO U G H SIX

(Failure To File Reports Of Foreign Bank And Financial
Accounts For Calendar Years 2011-2014)

42. P a ragraphs 1 through 30 and 32 through 36 are incog>orated here.

43. O n t h e filing due dates listed below, in the District of Coliunbia and elsewhere, the

defendant PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly did fail to file with

the Department of the Treasury an FBAR disclosing that he has a financial interest in, and signature

and other authority over, a bank, securities, and other financial account in a foreign country, which

had an aggregate value of more than $10,000, while violating another law of the United States and

as part o f pattern of illegal activity involving more than $100,000 in a 12-month period, during the

years listed below:

COUNT DUK DATE TO FILE FBAR

2011 June 29, 2012

2012 June 30, 2013

2013 June 30, 2014

2014 June 30, 2015

(31 U,S,C, ($ 5314 and 5322(b); 18 V,S,C. $ 2)

 COUNTS SEVEN THROU GH NINE
(Failure To File Reports Of Foreign Bank And Financial
Accounts For Calendar Years 2011-2013)

44. P a ragraphs 1 through 29 and 31 through 36 are incorporated here.

45. O n t h e filing due dates listed below, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the

defendant RICHARD W. GATES III unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly did fail to file with the

Department of the Treasury an FBAR disclosing that he has a financial interest in, and signature

and other authority over, a bank, securities, and other financial account in a foreign country, which

had an aggregate value of more than $10,000, while violating another law of the United States and

as part of pattern of illegal activity involving more than $100,000 in a 12-month period, during the

years listed below:

COUNT DUK DATE TO FILE FBAR

2011 June 29, 2012

2012 June 30, 2013

2013 June 30, 2014

(31 U.S.C. $$ 5314 and 5322(b); 18 U.S.C. $ 2)

COUNT TKN
(Unregistered Agent Of A Foreign Principal)

46. P a ragraphs 1 through 36 are incorporated here.

47. F r o m in or about and between 2008 and 2014, both dates being approximate and inclusive,

within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and

RICHARD W. GATES III knowingly and willfully, without registering with the Attorney General

as required by law, acted as agents of a foreign principal, to wit, the Government of Ukraine, the

26
Party of Regions, and Yanukovych,

(22 U.S.C. g$ 612 and 618(a)(1); 18 U.S.C. ( 2)

COURT KLKVKN
(False and Misleading FARA Statements)

48. P a ragraphs 1 through 36 are incorporated here.

49. O n or about November 23, 2016 and February 10, 2017, within the District of Columbia

and elsewhere, the defendants PAUL J, MANAFORT, JR,, and RICHARD W. GATES III

knowingly and willfully caused to be made a false statement of a material fact, and omitted a

material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, in a document filed with

and furnished to the Attorney General under the provisions of PARA, to wi t the underlined

statements:

"[DMI 's efforts on behalf of the Part of Re ions and Opposition Bloc did not

include meetin s or outreach within the U.S,"

o " either DM I n o r M e ssrs. Manafort or Gates had an a r e ement with the

Centre to rovide services."

" DMI did r ovide the Centre, attherequestofmembers ofthe Party of Regions,

with a list of o t ential U.S.-based consultants

including [Company A and

Company B] for the Centre 's reference and further consideration, The Centre

then contracted directl with Com an A and Com an B t o r o v ide services

within the United States for which these entities registered under the Lobbying

Disclosure Act."

"To Gates' recollection these effoits included rovidin olic b r i efin s to the

Centre and its consultants on ke i n i tiatives and o l itical develo ments in

27
 Ukraine includin a r tici ation in and/or coordination of related conference calls

and meetin s, Althou h Gates recalls interactin with the Centre 's consultants

re ardin efforts in the Ukraine and Euro e neither Gates nor Mr. Manafort recall

meetin w i t h or conductin o u t reach to U,S, o v ernment officials or U.S. media

o utlets on behalf of the the Centre nor do the recall bein a r t t o arran in o r

f acilitatin an suc h co n u n unications. Rather i t i s the r e c o llection a n d

understandin o f M essrs. Gates and Manafort that such commumcations would

have been facilitated and conducted b the Centre 's U.S. consultants as directed

b th e Centre u r s u ant to the a reement reached between those arties to which

e "[A se arch has been conducted for corres ondence containin additional

information related to t h e m a tters described i n t h e g o v ernment's L e t t ers.

However as a result of DM I' s E mail Retention Polic w h ich does not retain

communications be ond thirt d a s t h e search has returned no res onsive

communications,"

(22 U,S.C, $ $ 612, 618(a)(2); 18 U,S.C, $ 2)

COUNT TWELVK
(False Statements)

50. P a ragraphs 1 through 36 and paragraph 49 are incorporated here.

51. O n or about November 23, 2016 and February 10, 2017, within the District of Columbia

and elsewhere, in a matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government of

the United States, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and RICHARD W. GATES III
knowingly and willfully did cause another: to falsify, conceal, and cover up by a scheme and device

a material fact; to make a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and representation;

and to make and use a false writing and document knowing the same to contain a materially false,

fictitious, and fraudulent statement, to wit, the statements in the November 23, 2016 and February

10, 2017 submissions to the Department of Justice quoted in paragraph 49.

(18 U.S.C. )) 2, 1001(a))

FORFKITURK ALLEGATION

52, P u r s uant to Fed. R, Crim, P, 32.2, notice is hereby given to the defendants that the United

States will seek forfeiture as part of any sentence in accordance with Title 18, United States Code,

Sections 981(a)(1)(C) and 982(a)(1) and (a)(2), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c),

in the event of the defendants' convictions under Count Two of this Indictment. Upon conviction

of the offense charged in Count Two, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and RICHARD

W. GATES III shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, involved in such

offense, and any property traceable to such property, Upon conviction of the offenses charged in

Counts Ten and Eleven, the defendants PAUL J, MANAFORT, JR,, and RICHARD W. GATES

III shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived

from proceeds traceable to the offense(s) of conviction. Notice is further given that, upon

conviction, the United States intends to seek a judgment against each defendant for a sum of money

representing the property described in this paragraph, as applicable to each defendant (to be offset

by the forfeiture of any specific property),

53. T h e grand jury finds probable cause to believe that the property subject to forfeiture by

PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., includes, but is not limited to, the following listed assets:

29
 a. The r eal property and premises commonly known as 377 Union Street, Brooklyn,

New York, 11231 (Block 429, Lot 65), including all appurtenances, improvements, and

attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto,

b. The r eal property and premises commonly known as 29 Howard Street, 44D, New

York, New Y o rk, 1 0013 (Block 209, Lo t 1 104), including all a ppurtenances,

improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto;

The real property and premises comm

only known as 1046 N. Edgewood Street,

Arlington, Virginia, 22201, including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments

thereon, and any property traceable thereto;

d. The r eal property and premises commonly known as 174 Jobs Lane, Water Mill,

New York 11976, including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon,

and any property traceable thereto; and

e. Nort h western Mutual Universal Life Insurance Policy 18268327.

Substitute Assets

54, I f any of the property described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or

omission of any defendant-

a. cannot. be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

b, has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

d, has been substantially diminished in value; or

e. has been commingled with other property that cannot be subdivided without

difficulty;

30
it is thc intent of the United States of America, pursuant to I'itic 18. United States Code, Section

982(h) and 1'itIe 28, United States Code, Section 246I (c), incorporating 'I itle 2 I, United States

Code, Section 853, h> seek R>rl'eiture r>I'uny other prope>ty of said dcfcndanl.

(18 U.S.C. )sS981(a)(l)(C) ru>d 982; 28 U.S.C. $ 2461(c))

Robe>t S. Mueller, I I I
Special Counsel
Department ol.lustice

A T'RUE BILL.

o>' per>s(>n

Datet October 27, 2017

31