The Vatican created a world trust using the birth certificate to capture the value of each

individuals future productive energy. Each state, province and country in the fiat monetary
system, contributes their peoples value to this world trust identified by the SS, SIN or EIN
numbers (for example) maintained in the Vatican registry. Corporations worldwide (individuals
became corporate fictions through their birth certificate) are connected to the Vatican through
law (Vatican to Crown to BAR to laws to judge to people) and through money (Vatican birth
accounts value to IMF to Treasury (Federal Reserve) to banks to people (loans) to judges
(administration) and sheriffs (confiscation).

Judges administer the birth trust account in court matters favoring the court and the banks, acting
as the presumed beneficiary since they have not properly advised the true beneficiary of
their own trust. Judges, attorneys, bankers, lawmakers, law enforcement and all public officials
(servants) are now held personally liable for their confiscation of true beneficiarys homes, cars,
money and assets; false imprisonment, deception, harassment, and conversion of the true
beneficiarys trust funds.

In the case of the Motu Propria issued by Pope Francis on July 11th 2013, it is an instrument of
several functions and layers.

In the first instance, it may be legally construed to apply to the local matters of the administration
of the Holy See.

In the second instance, the document relates to the fact that the Holy See is the underpinning to
the whole global system of law, therefore anyone holding an office anywhere in the world is also
subject to these limits and that immunity no longer applies.

Thirdly, we see the Holy See and the Universal Church clearly separating itself from the nihilist
world of the professional elite who continue, to be proven time and time again, to be criminally
insane, bark raving mad and with no desire to do anything honorable until they are torn from
power by anyone, anybody who cares for the law.

Occupant of the office of the executor of the THOMAS WILLIAM HEALAN JR., Estate
accepted all Agents involved in CASE NO 2016D-00833-1 STATE OF GEORGIA VS
THOMAS WILLIAM HEALAN JR. Oaths of office thus creating a BINDING CONTRACT.

Confession of judgment, thats where anyone signs an oath of office theyre confessing
judgmentone of the reasons why THEY HAVE TO BE BONDED. They already pled guilty.

Unregistered foreign agents of Interpol dont have jurisdiction to do anything.

Their "Law" is built on trust law and so must take notice of these offices but nothing else. Trust
law is the highest form of law and Estate law is the highest form of trust law. All law is founded
in trust, it is the basis of what they do, so much so that 90% of the lawyers and solicitors that are
fined, barred jailed etc are for infringing trust law
Once you claim the office of Executor their claim to administrate on your behalf is finished, that
presumption is permanently rebutted.

UNJUST ENRICHMENT = Agents,CLERKS, JUDGES, PROSECUTORS probating estates

under a constructive trust and making the plaintiff the PROSECUTOR the beneficiary.

PUBLIC SERVANTS have an oath of officethey are bound to uphold under the Constitution,
Article 3, Section 2, sua sponte. All courts have toand they have do this sua sponteit means
on their own motion. They have tobecause standing is a Constitutional threshold issue. When
you raise the issue they have to do that. THEYRE MANDATED BY THE CONSTITUTION
TO DO THAT. Go read Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. An executor is the only
person that can bring a claim under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They got
executor, guardian, conservator and trustee, without enjoining the other parties. What does that
tell you?

Theres no ratification of commencement because you dont have a plaintiff and a defendant
before the court. The court does not have subject matter jurisdiction. Does the word FRAUD
come to mind?

A constructive trust is an equitable remedy resembling a trust imposed by a court to benefit a

party that has been wrongfully deprived of its rights due to either a person obtaining or holding
legal right to property which they should not possess due to unjust enrichment or interference

A trust made based on the law preventing injustice. It stops one party from getting an unfair
advantage by lying.

ESTATES OR STATES HAVE THE SAME MEANING WHEN USED IN MAGNA

CHARTA-DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE-CONSTITUTIONS OF WHICH ALL
DOCUMENTS ARE TRUSTS AND THE PEOPLE BENEFICIARIES

MOTU PROPRIA BY POPE FRANCIS

SSA TRUST
TITLE TO TRUST
FIDUCIARY DUTY
FORM 8281
IMPLIED CONTRACT
1099 OID
CONSTUCTIVE FRAUD
TRUST INDENTURE
FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT
BOND FLOATING BY CORPORATIONS
TRUST INDENTURE ACT
EXPRESS CONTRACT
RESTITUTION FROM RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW
CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS
RESTITUTION
QUANTUM MERUIT
UNJUST ENRICHMENT
QUASI CONTRACTS
JURISDICTION OF EQUITY
COERCION
ALTERNATIVE REMEDY
AGGRIEVED PARTY
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION OR CONCEALMENT
BENEFITS CONFERRED BY THIRD PERSON
RESTITUTION AND THE PRODUCTION OF LEGAL DOCTRINE
UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND THE REMEDIES OF CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND
QUANTUM MERUIT
BREACH OF DUTY IN DIRECT DEALING WITH BENEFICIARY
STATUTE OF FRAUDS
PRODUCT OF THEFT
BREACH OF UNENFORCEABLE CONTRACT TO CONVEY
BREACH OF EXPRESS TRUST BY DISLOYALTY
UCC- 3-502.
UCC-3-501
Title 28 USC 1602-1611