Nama :

NPM :
TUGAS 2 & 3
STATISTIKA INFERENSI

Soal 13-25
In The Effect of Nozzle Design on the Stability and Performance Of Turbulent Water Jets,
C. Theobald describes an experiment in which a shape measurement was determined for
several different nozzle types at different level of jet efflux velocity. Interest in this experiment
focuses primarily on nozzle type, and velocity is a nuisance factor.
a. Does nozzle type affect shape measurement? Compare the nozzles with the box
plot and analysis of variance.
b. Use the Fishers LSD method to determine specific differences between the
nozzles.
Jawaban 13-25 :
a. Diketahui,
Jet Efflux Velocity (m/s)
Nozzle Type
11.73 14.37 16.59 20.43 23.46 28.74
1 0.78 0.8 0.81 0.75 0.77 0.78
2 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.81 0.83
3 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.83
4 1.14 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.86 0.83
5 0.97 0.86 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.75
Faktor/treatment: Nozzle Type (jumlah level (a) = 5)
Block: Jet efflux velocity (jumlah level (b) = 6)
Response: Shape measurement
a) Hitung total dan rata-rata untuk treatments dan blocks
Jet Efflux Velocity (m/s) Treatment Totals Treatment Averages
Nozzle Type
11.73 14.37 16.59 20.43 23.46 28.74 yi yi
1 0.78 0.8 0.81 0.75 0.77 0.78 4.69 0.78167
2 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.81 0.83 5.12 0.85333
3 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.83 5.41 0.90167
4 1.14 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.86 0.83 5.66 0.94333
5 0.97 0.86 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.75 4.88 0.81333
Block Totals 4.67 4.4 4.44 4.14 4.09 4.02 25.76
Block Averages 0.934 0.88 0.888 0.828 0.818 0.804

b) Lakukan uji hipotesis.

1. Variable of interest : nozzle type mempengaruhi shape measurement
2. 0 = Nozzle type tidak mempengaruhi shape measurement

1
 Nama :
NPM :
3. 1 = Nozzle type mempengaruhi shape measurement
4. = 0.05
5. Test of statistic : Randomized Completed Block Design
6. Reject 0 jika 0 ,1,(1)(1) = 0 2.87
7. Computations:
Sum of Degree of
Source of variation Mean Square fo
Squares Freedom
Nozzle Type (Treatments) 0.10218 4 0.025545 8.91623
Jet efflux velocity (blocks) 0.062867 5 0.012573
Error 0.0573 20 0.002865
Total 0.222347 29

8. Kesimpulan :
Nilai 0 0.05,4,29 = 8.91. Ini menunjukkan bahwa 0 ditolak sehingga Nozzle type
mempengaruhi shape measurement.

b. Melakukan uji Fishers LSD.

20.002865
LSD = 0.05,20 6
= 0.053308

Treatment averages Score

y1 0.781667
y2 0.853333
y3 0.901667
y4 0.943333
y5 0.813333

Kombinasi Selisih LSD

5 vs 1 0.031667 0.053308
5 vs 2 -0.04 0.053308
5 vs 3 -0.08833 0.053308
5 vs 4 -0.13 0.053308
4 vs 1 0.161667 0.053308

2
 Nama :
NPM :
4 vs 2 0.09 0.053308
Kombinasi Selisih LSD
4 vs 3 -1.845 0.053308
3 vs 2 0.048333 0.053308
3 vs 1 0.12 0.053308
2 vs 1 0.071667 0.053308

Dari hasil uji Fishers LSD yang telah dilakukan, terdapat perbedaan di antara nozzles types
1&4, 2&4, 1&3, serta 1&2.

Soal 15-37
Montgomery presented the results of an experiment to compare four different mixing
techniques on the tensile strength of Portland cement. Is there any indication that mixing
techniques affects the strength? Use alpha = 0.05
Jawaban 15-37 :
Mixing
Tensile Strength Total
Technique
1 3129 3000 2865 2890
rank 14 11.5 6 7 38.5
2 3200 3000 2975 3150
rank 16 11.5 9 15 51.5
3 2800 2900 2985 3050
rank 5 8 10 13 36
4 2600 2700 2600 2765
rank 2 3 2 4 11

Uji Hipotesis:
1. Variable of interest : mixing techniques mempengaruhi tensile strength
2. 0 = mixing techniques tidak mempengaruhi tensile strength
3. 1 = mixing techniques mempengaruhi tensile strength
4. = 0.05
5. Test of statistic : Kruskal Wallis test
2
6. Reject 0 jika h ,1 = h 7.81
7. Computations:
1 (+1)2
2 = 1
[=1 =1 2 4
] = 22.8333
1 2 (+1)2

= 2 [=1
4
] = 192.5036

8. Kesimpulan :
2
Nilai h ,1 = 192.5036.

3
 Nama :
NPM :
Kesimpulan : 0 ditolak ; mixing techniques mempengaruhi tensile strength.