Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

CJASN ePress. Published on November 9, 2016 as doi: 10.2215/CJN.

05260516
In-Depth Review

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Hemodialysis


Emergencies
Manish Saha and Michael Allon

Abstract
Given the high comorbidity in patients on hemodialysis and the complexity of the dialysis treatment, it is re-
markable how rarely a life-threatening complication occurs during dialysis. The low rate of dialysis emergencies
Division of
can be attributed to numerous safety features in modern dialysis machines; meticulous treatment and testing of the Nephrology,
dialysate solution to prevent exposure to trace elements, toxins, and pathogens; adherence to detailed treatment University of Alabama
protocols; and extensive training of dialysis staff to handle medical emergencies. Most hemodialysis emergencies at Birmingham,
can be attributed to human error. A smaller number are due to rare idiosyncratic reactions. In this review, we Birmingham, Alabama
highlight major emergencies that may occur during hemodialysis treatments, describe their pathogenesis, offer
measures to minimize them, and provide specific interventions to prevent catastrophic consequences on the rare Correspondence:
Dr. Michael Allon,
occasions when such emergencies arise. These emergencies include dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, venous air Division of
embolism, hemolysis, venous needle dislodgement, vascular access hemorrhage, major allergic reactions to the Nephrology, PB,
dialyzer or treatment medications, and disruption or contamination of the dialysis water system. Finally, we de- Room 226, 1530 Third
scribe root cause analysis after a dialysis emergency has occurred to prevent a future recurrence. Avenue South,
Birmingham, AL
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, 2016. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05260516 35294. Email:
mdallon@uab.edu

Introduction but has been the subject of some recent comprehen-


There are currently approximately 400,000 patients sive papers (36).
with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) in the
United States (1). Each one receives dialysis at least
thrice weekly (156 times per year) for a total of over Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome
62 million dialysis sessions annually. Given the high Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) is a rare
comorbidity in patients on HD and the complexity of syndrome occurring in patients with severe azotemia
the dialysis treatment, it is remarkable how rarely a undergoing their initial HD session. It is characterized
life-threatening complication occurs during dialysis. by nausea, vomiting, headache, encephalopathy, and
For example, a cardiac arrest occurs only seven times seizures (7,8). DDS is attributed to the faster decline
per 100,000 HD sessions (2). The low rate of major of urea concentration in the blood than in the brain
complications can be attributed to numerous safety during the dialysis session. This lag (reverse urea ef-
features in modern dialysis machines; meticulous fect) creates an osmotic gradient that promotes net
treatment and testing of the dialysate solution to pre- water shift from the blood into the brain, leading to
vent exposure to trace elements, toxins, and patho- cerebral edema and its associated manifestations
gens; adherence to detailed treatment protocols; and (9,10). Rosen et al. (11) studied 10 patients with AKI
extensive training of dialysis staff to handle medical (baseline BUN concentrations of 210460 mg/dl) un-
emergencies. Most HD emergencies can be attributed dergoing their initial HD session. They obtained con-
to human error. A smaller number are due to rare current plasma and cerebrospinal uid (CSF) samples
idiosyncratic reactions. Ongoing dialysis staff train- before dialysis, immediately after dialysis, and 24
ing is essential to both prevent human error as well hours after dialysis. The CSF-to-plasma BUN ratio
as ensure prompt and effective interventions when was 0.91 predialysis, 1.99 immediately after dialysis,
complications happen. and back to baseline 24 hours later.
This review highlights major emergencies that may In animal models of uremia, the alteration in brain
occur during HD treatments (Table 1), measures to urea and other electrolytes concentrations does not
minimize them, and specic interventions to prevent completely account for the increase in brain osmolal-
catastrophic consequences on the rare occasions when ity during rapid HD (12). Arieff et al. (12) suggested
such complications arise. We have provided case re- that generation of new solutes (idiogenic osmoles)
ports to illustrate these emergencies in Supplemental in brain tissue accounted for brain edema during
Appendix. Complications related to more frequent rapid HD. In contrast, Silver et al. (13) reported that
HD are not addressed in this review. Intradialytic retained urea in brain was sufcient to cause a change
hypotension, a relatively common complication dur- in brain water content in rapidly dialyzing animals.
ing dialysis, is also beyond the scope of this review Moreover, the content of brain organic osmolytes

www.cjasn.org Vol , 2016 Copyright 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology 1


2 Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Table 1. Major dialysis emergencies

Estimated Frequency, per


Type of Emergency Refs.
Million HD Sessions

Dialysis disequilibrium
Air embolism 8.533 Tennankore et al. (31), Wong et al. (32)
Hemolysis
Vascular access hemorrhage
Venous needle dislodgement 1491 Tennankore et al. (31), Wong et al. (32), VA study (65),
Pennsylvania patient safety study (64)
Allergic reaction 21170 Villarroel and Ciarkowski (71), Daugirdas et al. (72),
Simon et al. (129)
Cardiac arrest 70 Karnik et al. (2)
Errors in following the HD
prescription

HD, hemodialysis.

(myoinosotol, glutamine, and taurine, etc.) did not increase removal rate. In a dog model of uremia, Arieff et al. (12)
in rapidly dialyzing animals (9,13,14). Idiogenic osmoles compared rapid and slow HD that achieved a similar re-
may be generated in brain during acute azotemia as an duction in BUN. Rapid HD (100 minutes with a blood ow
adaptive response to increased plasma BUN to prevent of 12 ml/kg per minute and a dialysate ow rate of 500
brain cell shrinkage (15) but are probably not generated ml/min) produced an elevated CSF pressure and seizures.
during rapid HD (9). Finally, in a CKD animal model, In contrast, slower HD (200 minutes at 5 ml/kg per minute
there was a decrease in brain urea transporters and an blood ow rate and a dialysate ow rate of 500 ml/min)
increase in aquaporins (AQPs; AQP4 and AQP9), provid- elevated the CSF pressure without causing seizures (12).
ing a potential molecular mechanism for the reverse urea Thus, a short HD session (2 hours) with a low blood ow
effect (16). (200 ml/min) and a urea reduction ratio goal of 0.4 is rec-
The spectrum of DDS ranges from headache and rest- ommended as the initial prescription for patients at risk for
lessness in mild forms to nausea, vomiting, and hyperten- DDS (7,17). Continuous RRT (CRRT) may be considered in
sion in patients with moderate cases to seizures and coma patients at high risk for DDS, including those with intra-
in patients with severe cases (7,17,18). There is no set BUN cranial mass or brain injury (20). Kidney Disease Improv-
value above which patients predictably develop DDS. ing Global Outcomes recommends CRRT over intermittent
Both a high BUN level (.175 mg/dl) and its rapid decline dialysis for AKI in patients with brain injury/edema or
are risk factors for DDS (7,18,19). Additional risk factors elevated intracranial pressure (21).
include preexisting neurologic conditions, the rst session Port et al. (22) reported that a higher dialysate sodium
of HD, hyponatremia, and liver disease (7,18,20). It is un- concentration (144154 mmol/L) prevented DDS symp-
known whether the risk of DDS is similar in patients with toms. Each 1-mmol/L increase in serum sodium offset
advanced CKD and those with AKI. Computed tomogra- the osmotic effect of 12 mg/dl BUN. Thus, sodium mod-
phy or magnetic resonance may show cerebral edema in eling may be useful in preventing DDS during the initial
patients with DDS. HD sessions in patients at risk (22). Adding glucose or
Several strategies may prevent DDS in patients with very glycerol to the dialysate may also prevent DDS (23).
high serum BUN undergoing their rst HD session (Table 2) Rodrigo et al. (24) studied patients on HD at risk for DDS
(7,12,17). The most important measure is to slow the urea by adding glucose to the dialysate or administering intrave-
nous mannitol. Increasing the dialysate glucose concen-
tration to 450 mg/dl contributed 23 mosM/kg H2O,
whereas intravenous mannitol (1 g/kg) added 8.510
Table 2. Potential strategies to prevent dialysis disequilibrium mosM/kg H2O (24).
syndrome in high-risk patients

(1) Limit the rst HD session to 22.5 h Air Embolism


(2) Limit the blood ow to 200250 ml/min Venous air embolism (VAE) during HD is thought to be
(3) Sodium modeling or a high-sodium dialysate rare, but because signs and symptoms of air embolism may
(4) Consider intravenous mannitol (1 g/kg) mimic other more common complications, careful vigilance
(5) Consider CRRT in patients at high risk for DDS and high suspicion are required for the diagnosis. Air
(traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage,
bubbles trapped in the systemic (pulmonary or cerebral)
intracranial mass)
microcirculation may cause local ischemia, circulatory
arrest, activation of complement and coagulation sys-
HD, hemodialysis; CRRT, continuous RRT; DDS, dialysis dis-
equilibrium syndrome. tem, localized inammation, and vascular endothelial cell
damage (2527).
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, , 2016 Hemodialysis Emergencies, Saha et al. 3

Owing to safeguards in the modern HD machine, symp- follow-up of 190 patients on home HD (approximately
tomatic air embolism is exceedingly rare during HD. Air 117,000 HD sessions) for an incidence of less than one
may enter the extracorporeal HD circuit either as a re- episode per 100,000 HD sessions. This case resulted from
sult of residual air trapped in the tubing or dialyzer due not clamping the arterial line during disconnection, thereby
to incomplete priming or because of a broken or loose luer allowing air to enter the tubing (32).
connection prepump (where the arterial pressure is Most microbubbles ,50 mm in diameter and many mi-
negative) (25,2830) (Figure 1). Air entering the extracor- crobubbles between 50 and 200 mm pass through the ve-
poreal circuit presents to the venous air trap placed distal nous bubble catcher without triggering an alarm (33). The
to the dialyzer, immediately decreasing the blood level in rate of microbubble formation is dependent on the blood
the chamber. The change in uid level in this chamber is ow rate and negative arterial pressure. The total volume
recognized by a sensor that triggers an alarm and stops the of microbubbles during an HD session is a few milliliters, a
blood pump. As a consequence of these technologic safe- volume insufcient to cause acute symptoms (34). The ve-
guards, air embolism in the modern era results from hu- nous air trap and air detector prevent infusion of larger
man error. In a retrospective cohort study of 202 patients amounts of air. If the air detector triggered an alarm for
on home HD, only six patients had suspected air embolism every microbubble, HD would be regularly interrupted
that occurred during 183,603 dialysis sessions for an over- (28). Therefore, a safe limit of air infusion (0.1 ml/kg
all incidence less than one episode per 30,000 dialysis ses- body wt for bolus infusion and 0.03 ml/kg per minute
sions. These episodes were related to inadequate priming for continuous infusion) has been suggested (25,28).
or lack of clamping of the catheter or tubing (31). Another Measures to minimize the risk of air embolism include
study reported a single case of air embolism during avoidance of extremely high dialysis blood ow, keeping

Figure 1. | Venous air embolism may arise from 4 possible areas of air entry into the dialysis circuit. Schematic diagram of a hemodialysis
circuit depicting four possible areas of air entry. (1) A broken or loose luer connection between the arterial needle and the tubing can result in air
entry, because this segment has negative intraluminal pressure. (2) A hole in the arterial tubing can suck air into the arterial line. (3) Air entry can
occur during administration of anticoagulation or saline. (4) Inadequate priming can result in air entry from the dialyzer or dialysis tubing. A
crack in the venous bloodline will not cause air entry due to the positive intraluminal pressure. Air entering the circuit presents to the venous air
trap and forms foam/bubble at the top of blood level. As soon as the blood level in the venous air trap chamber falls below the air detector level,
it immediately triggers an alarm and stops blood flow. As a consequence, venous air embolism occurs due to human error.
4 Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

the arterial luer lock tightened, adequately priming the dialysate contaminants, or hyperthermia may each enhance
dialyzer and tubing system before initiation of an HD hemolysis (Table 3) (4952). Because blood ow is higher
session, and maintenance of a high blood level in the at the center of a laminar ow than at the edges (wall) of
venous air catcher (29,35). the extracorporeal circuit, the RBC membrane is exposed
Massive VAE manifests with chest pain, dyspnea, and to a differential force on two different sides, thereby
syncope. Cerebral air embolism may cause blurry vision, causing a shear stress (51). The low degree of hemolysis
altered mental status, seizures, or ischemic stroke. Patients that typically occurs during HD is insufcient to produce a
may develop hypotension and tachycardia due to right measurable drop in hematocrit. More signicant hemolysis
ventricular overload with involvement of the pulmonary may occur in cases of dialysate contamination with trace
capillary bed (26,27,36). The degree of end organ damage metals (copper or zinc), disinfectant added to city water
depends on the rate of air entry, volume of air, the pa- (chloramine), or nitrate (49,53). The normal starting dialy-
tients position, and underlying cardiac status. In dogs, sis blood ow with a new arteriovenous (AV) stula is 250
rapid injection of 7.5 ml/kg air is lethal. In humans, a vol- ml/min with a 17-gauge needle. In comparison, a dialysis
ume of 100300 ml air is considered fatal (37,38). A high blood ow of 500 ml/min can be delivered using a
clinical suspicion is required to diagnose VAE. Precordial 14-gauge needle without inducing hemolysis (54). The
Doppler can detect 0.05 ml/kg air, whereas transesopha- positive and negative pressures (approximately 1500 and
geal echocardiogram can detect 0.02 ml/kg air (39). Com- 2500 mmHg, respectively) sustained by RBCs in the ex-
puted tomography may detect air in suspected cases of tracorporeal circuit usually do not cause any hemolysis
cerebral embolism. (51). However, attempting a high dialysis blood ow
After VAE is suspected, the patient should be provided with a small gauge needle may induce hemolysis.
with 100% oxygen (27). Aspiration of air may be attempted Overheated dialysate may cause thermal injury and
if the catheter is still in place (26). Early studies suggested hemolysis. A 1948 study by Ham et al. (55) showed changes
that the left lateral recumbent (LLR) position could pre- in RBC morphology, osmotic fragility, and hemolysis at
vent right ventricular failure by preventing outow tract temperatures .47C. In 1975, Berkes et al. (56) reported
obstruction during air embolism by moving the air more on a patient with delayed hemolysis 48 hours after expo-
superiorly in the right ventricle (4042). Geissler et al. (43) sure to overheated dialysate of 50C. Because modern
and Mehlhorn et al. (44) studied the effect of injecting HD machines trigger an alarm at dialysate temperature
2.5 ml/kg air at a rate of 5 ml/s in dogs and concluded .39.5C, hyperthermic hemolysis is rare (55,57). If the
that the LLR position did not provide hemodynamic HD machine triggers an alarm for overheated dialysate,
advantage over the supine position. Although traditional an appropriate stepwise protocol should be followed: re-
teaching has been to maintain an LLR with head down sponding to the alarm, immediate cessation of dialysis,
position for suspected VAE, the supine position has been and informing concerned authorities and supervisor to
recommended more recently (26). The supine position also nd the source of heated water (57). Jepson and Alonso
provides additional advantage of appropriate delivery of (57) reported an issue with a valve system that led to
oxygen and hemodynamic support, a critical part of the heated dialysate of 39.8C; no harm was caused to the pa-
treatment (26). An LLR position has been recommended by tient due to the attentiveness of the nurse who followed an
Muth and Shank (26) if aspiration of air is to be attempted appropriate protocol (57).
through an existing central venous catheter (CVC) for Hemolysis due to osmotic changes and dialysate impu-
VAE (26,43). rities is also rare. Several investigators have reported
Air embolism may also occur during placement of an mechanical injury to RBCs caused by kinked dialysis
HD CVC, accidental disconnection during its use, or at its tubing (52,58). Sudden bends, turns, and the entry point
removal. Vesely (45) reported 15 cases of air embolism into the dialyzer are additional vulnerable areas for kink-
occurring during placement of 11,583 tunneled and non- ing. A simultaneous decrease of .25 mmHg in both the
tunneled CVCs (0.13%). All 15 cases occurred during in- arterial (prepump) and venous (postpump) pressures
sertion of tunneled CVCs; most patients had mild to suggests a severe postpump kinked tubing that may result
moderate symptoms, except one who died. Rinsing the in hemolysis; this drop in pressure results from decrease
catheter, placing the patient in a supine position, and blood ow due to severe obstruction. Therefore, it essen-
inserting the needle during expiration may prevent air tial to use the length of tubing recommended by the man-
embolism during CVC placement (46). A break in the cath- ufacturer, monitor the arterial and venous dialysis
eter or accidental disconnection may also lead to fatal air pressures, and avoid sudden bends in the tubing (59). A
embolism (47). During CVC removal, the patient should be multistate outbreak of hemolysis during HD led to the
supine, with catheter removal performed during exhala- nding of faulty blood tubing causing hemolysis. Narrow-
tion or a Valsalva maneuver to increase intrathoracic pres- ing of the blood tubing before its entry to the dialyzer led
sure (46). An air-occlusive dressing should be in place for to exposure of RBCs to increased pressure and consequent
24 hours to prevent delayed air entry through the subcu- hemolysis (60).
taneous track (48). Patients with severe intradialytic hemolysis complain of
nausea, shortness of breath, abdominal/back pain, and
chills and initially develop acute hypertension (61). Con-
Hemolysis rmatory laboratory data include low serum haptoglobin,
Red blood cells (RBCs) undergo shear stress when they elevated lactate dehydrogenase, reduction in hematocrit,
circulate through the HD circuit, and are, therefore, at risk and pink serum. When hemolysis is suspected, the HD
for fragmentation. Additionally, blood osmotic changes, session should be stopped immediately. Blood should
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, , 2016 Hemodialysis Emergencies, Saha et al. 5

erythrocytes. If several patients develop hemolysis in a sin-


Table 3. Causes of hemolysis during hemodialysis gle dialysis unit, contamination of the dialysate, faulty
tubing, and altered dialysate osmolality should be suspec-
Dialysate related ted. A systematic assessment of the potential causes is
Contamination with copper, zinc, nitrate, nitrite, and imperative to avoid recurrent hemolysis during a sub-
chloramine
sequent HD session (Figure 2). A root cause analysis
Hypo-osmolar dialysate
Hyperthermia (RCA) should be performed in each case, and every as-
Extracorporeal circuit related pect of the HD session should be well examined; blood
Blood pump malocclusion tubing and the needle system should be saved for future
Singleneedle highow dialysis investigation.
Partial occlusion of HD catheter
Kinked tubing, faulty blood tubing
Patient related Venous Needle Dislodgement
Sickle cell anemia Venous needle dislodgement (VND) is a rare but life-
Hereditary spherocytosis threatening complication of HD. With a typical dialysis
Autoimmune hemolysis blood ow of 300500 ml/min, hemorrhagic shock ensues
within minutes (after loss of 30%40% of total blood vol-
HD, hemodialysis. ume) (62). The Veterans Administration National Center
for Patient Safety reported 40 major hemorrhages due to
VND or disconnection at the dialysis catheter site during
not be returned from the extracorporeal circulation to the 2.5 million dialysis sessions or approximately one episode
bloodstream due to the risk of precipitating severe hyper- per 60,000 HD sessions (63). Two large Canadian series of
kalemia by infusing potassium released from hemolyzed patients on home HD reported VND in one in 11,000 (31)

Figure 2. | Schematic diagram illustrating an approach to evaluation of a suspected case of hemolysis during hemodialysis (HD) and its root
cause analysis to prevent future episodes. LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
6 Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

and one in 20,000 HD sessions (32). Data from Pennsylva- detailed 12-step protocol, including taping techniques,
nia public safety reported 32 patients with VND during assessment of risks for VND, and its prevention, is available
2.26 million HD session, for a frequency of about one in at https://www.annanurse.org/download/reference/
70,000 HD sessions (64). journal/vndArticle.pdf (65).
The major factors leading to needle dislodgement are
related to access care (improper taping of access tubing to
the skin, loose luer lock tubing connection, bloodlines not Allergic Reaction during HD
being looped loosely, or access site not being visible) and An allergic or allergic-like reaction during HD must be
patient factors (a confused patient pulling the needle out closely investigated, because re-exposure to the allergen
of the access) (65). An acute decrease in dialysis venous may result in worse signs and symptoms and a poor
pressure should theoretically ensue rapidly after dislodge- outcome. A 19821983 survey documented 3.3 allergic re-
ment of the venous needle from the access and trigger a actions per 1000 patient-years of dialysis with a hollow
pressure alarm to alert the dialysis nurse. However, the ber dialyzer (71). Daugirdas et al. (72) reported 21 severe
venous alarm monitor on HD machines is affected by allergic reactions to dialyzers in 260,000 dialysis sessions
not only the intra-access pressure but also, the dialysis for a frequency of approximately one episode in 12,000 HD
blood ow, blood viscosity, ow resistance of the extra- sessions. These allergic reactions included four respiratory
corporeal tubing, and the height difference between the arrests and one death. A patient may get an allergic reac-
access and venous drip chamber (66). In addition, the intra- tion to the dialyzer itself or more commonly, the sterilizer
access pressure is higher for grafts than stulas (by 27/15 (kills all micro-organisms, including bacterial spores),
mmHg) (67). Ideally, to ensure early detection of blood loss, disinfectant (kills micro-organisms on the surface but not
the venous pressure alarm would be set 10 mmHg below the bacterial spores), heparin, or other medications infused
baseline dialysis venous pressure. However, the venous pres- during dialysis (antibiotics, blood, or iron) (73,74).
sure varies by 3040 mmHg during a typical dialysis session Allergic reactions are classied as type A and type B
due to patient position (reclining versus sitting) and move- (75,76). Type A allergic reactions occur within 520 min-
ment of the access extremity (66,68). To prevent triggering utes of HD initiation and present with pruritus, urticaria,
multiple false pressure alarms during each dialysis session, bronchospasm, laryngeal edema, or anaphylactic shock.
the pressure monitor is usually set below that threshold. Type B reactions occur later in the dialysis session and
As a consequence, the dialysis staff may have a false sense are associated with less intense symptoms, such as chest
of security when, in fact, a substantial blood leak may occur and back pain. Type A reactions are mediated through IgE,
before the venous pressure drops by 40 mmHg and triggers whereas type B reactions are complement mediated (77).
the pressure alarm. Earlier dialyzers were composed of cellulose (a cotton
Various sensors can detect blood leaks during VND. derivative). Owing to their organic component, they
Some were initially developed to detect moisture related to activated the alternate complement cascade and were
enuresis but later, used off label for detection of VND by considered bioincompatible (77,78). Subsequent modica-
some dialysis units (65,66). Redsense, a device developed tions that added acetate side chains to the cellulose (cellu-
for detection of blood leakage, has been Food and Drug lose acetate, diacetate, and triacetate) reduced complement
Administration cleared for in-center and home HD. It con- activation, making the dialyzers more biocompatible. At
sists of an alarm unit connected by an optical ber to a present, most United States dialysis centers use synthetic
sensor patch; the sensor patch has an absorbent patch in dialyzers, which are considered highly biocompatible, be-
the center. The patch is placed over the venous needle, cause they only minimally activate complement (78). Syn-
with the absorbent area placed directly over the needle thetic dialyzers are composed of polymethylmethacrylate,
entry point. In the event of VND or signicant blood leak- polyether sulfone, polysulfone, or polyacrylonitrile (PAN)
age, the blood comes in contact with the optical sensor that (78). Dialyzers are sterilized with chemicals (ethylene ox-
is embedded within the patch and generates a continuous ide), steam (heat), or radiation (g or b). Ethylene oxide has
alarm (69). Ahlmn et al. (70) reported that Redsense cor- fallen out of favor due to its propensity to attach to the
rectly alarmed in 92.5% of cases of blood leakage; when potting compound of the dialyzer and cause type A aller-
the patch was modied and placed closer to the venous gic reactions (7982).
puncture site, the device functioned in 97.2% of all tests Various mechanisms (Figure 3) have been proposed for
(70). Although blood sensors add substantially to the cost allergic and allergic-like reactions during HD depending
of HD (Redsense costs about $550), they can be considered on the allergen (77,8288). Ethylene oxide mediates ana-
for additional safety in high-risk patients and patients on phylaxis through IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, whereas
home HD. However, sensors should never replace an ap- dialyzer components typically activate complement or
propriate stepwise protocol to prevent VND. This includes bradykinin. Tielemans et al. (89) reported ve cases of anaphy-
proper taping of access needle, adequate tightening of lactoid reactions to acrylonitrile 69 (AN69) dialyzers occurring
luer lock at all connections, and ensuring that all blood- within minutes of HD initiation in patients on an angiotensin
lines are loosely looped to prevent accidental dislodge- converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). This reaction is
ment. The access site should always be examined mediated by bradykinin rather than IgE, histamine, or
whenever the venous pressure monitor suggests a drop complement (89). The negatively charged moiety of
in pressure, even if the blood leakage detector does not AN69 during contact phase with blood may activate Ha-
generate an alarm. The two most important measures are geman factor (factor 12), leading to bradykinin formation.
maintaining the access site visible at all times and keep- ACEi also inhibits kininase, an enzyme that inactivates
ing high-risk patients close to the nurses station (65). A bradykinin, thereby further increasing plasma bradykinin
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, , 2016 Hemodialysis Emergencies, Saha et al. 7

Figure 3. | Flow chart of possible causes of allergic or allergic-like reactions during hemodialysis. Similar symptoms could also be caused by
other etiologies, like endotoxin back filtration causing pyrogenic reaction, hemolysis, and rarely, air embolism. Heparin can cause anaphylaxis
or anaphylactoid associated with positive heparininduced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. Blood products, antibiotics, and other
medications used with dialysis may also cause allergic reaction. Intravenous iron may cause a reaction due to IgE-mediated or complement
activationrelated pseudoallergy (CARPA); at-risk patients have history of atopy, faster infusion, and possible iron dextran exposure than iron
sucrose. Ethylene oxide may bind to HSA and act as a hapten to induce an allergic reaction. Although an allergic reaction to synthetic bio-
compatible dialyzers is rare, it has been reported. A dialyzer with different housing compound or modified cellulose dialyzer may be con-
sidered if other causes are ruled out. Occasionally, measuring tryptase and IgE levels may be helpful; additional immunoassays and prick testing
may be undertaken after consultation with an allergist. ACEi, angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor; AN69, acrylonitrile; HSA, human
serum albumin; IV, intravenous; PAN, polyacrylonitrile.

levels and producing hypotension and angioedema in the of anaphylaxis to heparin was caused by oversulfated chon-
absence of urticaria (90,91). PAN membranes pretreated droitin sulfate contaminants introduced during the
with positively charged polyethyleneimine, are associated manufacturing process (83).
with markedly reduced bradykinin activation (92). Patients Several measures can minimize the risk or severity of an
on ACEi can be safely dialyzed with AN69 dialyzers that allergic reaction during a dialysis session (Table 4). First,
are surface treated with polyethyleneimine (93). the dialyzer should be primed with sufcient saline to
Disinfectants, such as hypochlorite (bleach) and formal- wash out the sterilant. Second, switching from ethylene oxide
dehyde, which are frequently used to reprocess dialyzers, sterilization to g-radiation or steam sterilization is helpful
may also cause an allergic reaction if they are not ade- (81,86). Third, if a suspected allergic reaction occurs, it is critical
quately rinsed out before the dialysis session (76). to not return the blood into the extracorporeal circuit so as
Heparin may result in heparin-induced thrombocytope- to avoid aggravating the hypersensitivity reaction (86).
nia (HIT) (94). Five percent of patients with HIT develop When a suspected allergic reaction occurs, one should
allergic-like reactions characterized by nausea, cough, also rule out other complications that can mimic this con-
fever, and chills (83). Additional clinical features include dition, such as air embolism, hemolysis, or a pyrogenic
hypertension initially, transient global amnesia, and pro- reaction. Severe hypersensitivity reactions are treated
fuse diarrhea. HITassociated allergiclike reaction is me- with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine
diated by IgG rather than IgE. In 20072008, an epidemic (77,86).
8 Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Table 4. Measures to minimize an allergic reaction to a dialyzer

(1) Prime the dialyzer well


(2) Switch from ethylene oxide sterilization to g- or steam-sterilized dialyzer
(3) In the event of a hypersensitivity reaction, do not return the blood, because this may aggravate the allergic reaction
(4) Treat with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine for a hypersensitivity reaction
(5) Rule out other conditions that may simulate an allergic reaction (air embolism, hemolysis, pyrogenic reaction)

Adverse Reactions with Intravenous Iron In case of more widespread loss of water, stepwise pro-
Intravenous iron, which is more efcacious than oral iron tocol should be followed, including saving water, alerting
in raising hemoglobin in the HD population, is adminis- higher authorities, and communication with the city water
tered to approximately 70% of patients on HD each month body. Patients needing acute dialysis may be switched to
(95). Adverse drug events to intravenous iron were esti- alternative RRT, like CRRT, or transferred to a different
mated at 94 per million intravenous doses in 19982000 medical facility (107).
and decreased to 38 per million by 20012003 after a Patients on in-center HD are exposed to close to 200 L
switch to safer formulations (96,97). The rate of fatal ad- water during an average dialysis session. With the dialysis
verse drug events was highest for higher molecular weight membrane being the only barrier between the dialysate and
dextran (11.3 per million), intermediate for lower molecu- blood, it is critical that municipal water undergo rigorous
lar weight dextran (3.3 per million), and lowest for sodium purication before its use during dialysis. Each dialysis
ferric gluconate (0.9 per million) and iron sucrose (0.6 per unit has its own water system for purication of municipal
million). Wysowski et al. (98) reported that the mortality water, protocol for sampling and monitoring, and man-
rate between 2002 and 2006 was exceedingly low (0.060.32 agement to adhere to the guidelines for water quality set by
deaths per million doses of iron purchased). the American National Standards Institute/Association for
Minor adverse reactions can occur with any intravenous the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (104).
iron preparation, but severe lifethreatening reactions are Pyrogenic reaction during a dialysis session may be due
rare. Minor symptoms, such as pruritus, ushing, mild to multiple causes, including infection from various sources;
chest discomfort, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea, usually water/dialysate bacterial contamination should be consid-
abate with cessation of the infusion; it can be restarted at a ered if there is cluster of similar events. Chloramine/
lower rate after symptoms resolve (73,87). If patients de- chlorine is added to city water for decontamination; this level
velop urticaria, then infusion should be stopped, and the of protection is abolished downstream of carbon tanks in
patient should be observed. Restarting the infusion after dialysis water systems, and thus, the reverse osmosis sys-
treatment with steroids may be considered after symptoms tem, storage tank, and pipes are subjected to contamination
resolve (99). A more severe reaction may present with se- (105,108,109). Dialysis units follow strict protocols to deliver
vere chest pain, persistent hypotension, and cough, and it
may warrant stopping the infusion and treating with ste-
roids and epinephrine. Premedication with steroids should
be considered in patients at high risk of developing a re-
action: history of inammatory arthritis, multiple drug al-
lergies, or severe asthma (100,101). Diphenhydramine
should be avoided as a premedication, because it may
cause symptoms similar to minor reactions and be falsely
interpreted as an adverse effect (102,103). A life-threatening
reaction (stridor, wheezing, periorbital edema, or symptom-
atic hypotension) to intravenous iron infusion precludes fu-
ture iron infusion (99). Intravenous iron is contraindicated in
the rst trimester of pregnancy and should be used with
caution during the second and third trimesters (87).

Emergencies Related to Dialysis Water System


This is a very brief review of the HD emergencies that can
arise due to water system issues. Several excellent review
articles provide greater detail (104106). Acute loss of wa-
ter in a dialysis unit is an emergency. It may be localized
due to breakage in water pipes in the dialysis unit only or
represent a hospital-wide problem. If it is localized to
dialysis units, immediate notication to concerned author-
ities, nursing supervisor, and medical director should
be made. If water from other areas of the hospital can be Figure 4. | An arteriovenous graft with evidence of thin shiny surface
used, then a portable reverse osmosis system can be used. (arrow) and superficial ulceration (arrow head) over a pseudoaneurysm.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, , 2016 Hemodialysis Emergencies, Saha et al. 9

puried water for dialysis, including running water sys- An outbreak of uoride toxicity leading to severe
tem, maintenance, disinfection process, and periodic pruritus, headache, and cardiac arrest has been reported
checks and evaluating with water cultures and endotoxin (118). It was found that an exhausted resin of deionizer
assays. Nonadherence to the protocol may result in water was releasing uoride into the water. Fluoride (an anion)
contamination. binds to calcium and magnesium and lowers their serum
Chloramine and chlorine are removed by primary and level. Additionally, it may cause hyperkalemia by its ac-
secondary carbon tanks of the dialysis water system. Chlo- tion on the sodium-potassium ATPase pump and indi-
ramine may cause hemolysis and methemoglobinemia in rectly cause efux of potassium from cells (119).
patients on dialysis due to exhaustion of carbon tanks or To prevent such complications, appropriate protocol
excess load of chloramine in city water exceeding the should always be followed. A periodic communication with
capacity of carbon tanks (49,108111). Thus, total chlorine, the city water body and hospital maintenance may prevent
which is the sum of free chlorine and bound chlorine (chlo- additional complications. A cluster of adverse symptoms or
ramine), is measured from both carbon tanks every 4 events should prompt a thorough investigation.
hours. The total chlorine level should be ,0.1 parts per
million (1 part per million 51 mg/L) (104,112).
Methemoglobinemia usually manifests as cyanosis with Vascular Access Hemorrhage
chocolate brown color blood in the tubing and saturation Hemorrhage from an AV access is an uncommon but
gap (113). In such cases, the oxygen saturation calculated potentially fatal complication if it is not recognized
from arterial blood gas (PaO2$70 mmHg) is higher than promptly and acted on with an appropriate intervention.
that measured by pulse oximetry (SaO2#90%) (114,115). Most fatal vascular access hemorrhages occur outside of the
The diagnosis is conrmed by direct methemoglobin dialysis facility, but occasionally, they rupture at the
measurement. dialysis unit (120). Patients and their families should be
Hydrogen peroxide is commonly used for disinfection of educated about the recognition and emergent manage-
water storage tanks in hospitals. It is usually removed by ment of a bleeding AV access. Pseudoaneurysm (PSA)
carbon lters but not by reverse osmosis. There have been is a false aneurysm, because it does not have all of the
reports of hemolysis and methemoglobinemia from expo- layers of a vein, but it is rather composed of hematoma
sure of patients blood to hydrogen peroxide. This may and brous tissue. It results from trauma and repeated
happen if the potable water system does not have a carbon cannulation during HD. Aneurysms usually form at the
lter or if the carbon tanks gets exhausted when larger outow vein/graft of an AV access and result from in-
quantities of chlorine/chloramine and hydrogen peroxide creasing dilation due to high blood ow and vascular
have to be processed (113,116,117). damage (121,122). Physical examination of an aneurysm

Figure 5. | A basic scheme for root cause analysis (RCA) after an adverse event related to hemodialysis (HD).
10 Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

is the most important tool to determine the need for an be informed of the complication. An RCA should be
intervention (Figure 4). Any rapidly enlarging PSA, evi- exhaustive and condential. After a cause is found,
dence of outow stenosis (arm elevation testfailure to appropriate measures should be implemented to prevent
collapse, high-pitch bruit), thinning or ulceration of skin a similar occurrence. These measures may include a change
over the PSA, pulsatility, or evidence of infection should in policy or protocol, provider education, communication
prompt urgent intervention (121,123). Proper cannulation among different staff members and hospital personnel,
techniques may prevent PSA formation. Rope ladder tech- multidisciplinary approach, and periodic mock drills and
nique prevents aneurysm formation, whereas repeated skills testing.
cannulation of the same area may promote aneurysm
formation (123). Acknowledgments
If the aneurysm is stable without evidence of imminent This work was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health
rupture (ulceration, thinning or shiny skin, or infection), grant T32DK007545 (to M.S.).
then referral should be made for a stulogram to evaluate
for potential underlying outow stenosis. Angioplasty to Disclosures
decrease the intra-access pressure may prevent aneurysm None.
formation or slow its growth.
In the event of bleeding from vascular access site, direct
References
continuous pressure with a nger for 1520 minutes is
1. USRDS: US Renal Data System USRDS 2013 Annual Data
the most effective method of controlling the bleeding. In Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal
the event of rupture of a PSA or aneurysm away from Disease in the United States, Vol. 2, Bethesda, MD, National
dialysis unit or hospital, direct pressure with a nger at Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive
the site of bleeding is the best method of controlling and Kidney Diseases, 2013
bleeding. Patients should be advised to continue holding 2. Karnik JA, Young BS, Lew NL, Herget M, Dubinsky C, Lazarus
JM, Chertow GM: Cardiac arrest and sudden death in dialysis
direct pressure until emergency medical help arrives and units. Kidney Int 60: 350357, 2001
avoid applying a tourniquet, towel, or BP cuff to the 3. Agarwal R: How can we prevent intradialytic hypotension?
extremity (124). Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 21: 593599, 2012
4. Dheenan S, Henrich WL: Preventing dialysis hypotension: A
comparison of usual protective maneuvers. Kidney Int 59:
11751181, 2001
RCA 5. Perazella MA: Pharmacologic options available to treat symp-
Any adverse event, whether it has occurred, has the tomatic intradialytic hypotension. Am J Kidney Dis 38[Suppl 4]:
potential to occur, or was averted by appropriate in- S26S36, 2001
tervention, requires a thorough investigation to identify 6. Reilly RF: Attending rounds: A patient with intradialytic hypo-
its root cause (125). All dialysis units must have proto- tension. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 798803, 2014
7. Patel N, Dalal P, Panesar M: Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome:
cols for reporting such events and taking appropriate A narrative review. Semin Dial 21: 493498, 2008
measures toward RCA. The culture of safety in the 8. Arieff AI: Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome: Current concepts
health care eld comes from education, following proto- on pathogenesis and prevention. Kidney Int 45: 629635, 1994
cols, and a balance between stafng and work burden 9. Silver SM, Sterns RH, Halperin ML: Brain swelling after dialysis:
(126,127). There is often one main root cause leading to Old urea or new osmoles? Am J Kidney Dis 28: 113, 1996
10. Kennedy AC, Linton AL, Eaton JC: Urea levels in cerebrospinal
an adverse event and multiple other related factors; all of fluid after haemodialysis. Lancet 1: 410411, 1962
these factors should be evaluated. There are various 11. Rosen SM, OConnor K, Shaldon S: Haemodialysis disequilib-
guidelines regarding performing an RCA, including rium. BMJ 2: 672675, 1964
one by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 12. Arieff AI, Massry SG, Barrientos A, Kleeman CR: Brain water
(128). and electrolyte metabolism in uremia: Effects of slow and rapid
hemodialysis. Kidney Int 4: 177187, 1973
During an adverse event, patient safety and management 13. Silver SM, DeSimone JA Jr., Smith DA, Sterns RH: Dialysis
of the adverse event are paramount. The nursing staff and disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) in the rat: Role of the reverse
other care providers should work as a team to achieve that urea effect. Kidney Int 42: 161166, 1992
goal rather than blaming each other or attempting to nd a 14. Silver SM: Cerebral edema after rapid dialysis is not caused by
cause. After the patient has been stabilized, additional an increase in brain organic osmolytes. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:
16001606, 1995
stepwise measures should be undertaken toward an RCA. 15. Trachtman H, Futterweit S, Tonidandel W, Gullans SR: The role
This may start with an incident report completed by of organic osmolytes in the cerebral cell volume regulatory
nursing staff. The nurses are encouraged to elaborate the response to acute and chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 3:
sequence of events, including those related to the patient, 19131919, 1993
surrounding environment, and the dialysis machine. The 16. Trinh-Trang-Tan MM, Cartron JP, Bankir L: Molecular basis
for the dialysis disequilibrium syndrome: Altered aquaporin
dialysis log, including patient and machine vital measure-
and urea transporter expression in the brain. Nephrol Dial
ments, should be completed. The HD machine, dialyzer, Transplant 20: 19841988, 2005
and tubing should be sequestered pending completion of 17. Zepeda-Orozco D, Quigley R: Dialysis disequilibrium syn-
the investigation. In an isolated event, like hemolysis drome. Pediatr Nephrol 27: 22052211, 2012
during HD, a stepwise protocol toward that event may 18. Bagshaw SM, Peets AD, Hameed M, Boiteau PJ, Laupland KB,
be considered (Figure 2). In other cases, a broader view Doig CJ: Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome: Brain death fol-
lowing hemodialysis for metabolic acidosis and acute renal
may be more appropriate (Figure 5). failurea case report. BMC Nephrol 5: 9, 2004
The appropriate authorities, including the dialysis su- 19. Lopez-Almaraz E, Correa-Rotter R: Dialysis disequilibrium
pervisor, legal system, and hospital authorities, should syndrome and other treatment complications of extreme
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, , 2016 Hemodialysis Emergencies, Saha et al. 11

uremia: A rare occurrence yet not vanished. Hemodial Int 12: 44. Mehlhorn U, Burke EJ, Butler BD, Davis KL, Katz J, Melamed E,
301306, 2008 Morris WP, Allen SJ: Body position does not affect the hemo-
20. Esnault P, Lacroix G, Cungi PJ, DAranda E, Cotte J, Goutorbe P: dynamic response to venous air embolism in dogs. Anesth
Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome in neurointensive care unit: Analg 79: 734739, 1994
The benefit of intracranial pressure monitoring. Crit Care 16: 45. Vesely TM: Air embolism during insertion of central venous
472, 2012 catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12: 12911295, 2001
21. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome: Clinical Practice 46. Feil M: Preventing central line air embolism. Am J Nurs 115:
Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury, 2012. Available at: http:// 6469, 2015
www.kdigo.org/clinical_practice_guidelines/pdf/KDIGO% 47. Halliday P, Anderson DN, Davidson AI, Page JG: Management
20AKI%20Guideline.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2016 of cerebral air embolism secondary to a disconnected central
22. Port FK, Johnson WJ, Klass DW: Prevention of dialysis disequi- venous catheter. Br J Surg 81: 71, 1994
librium syndrome by use of high sodium concentration in the 48. Turnage WS, Harper JV: Venous air embolism occurring after
dialysate. Kidney Int 3: 327333, 1973 removal of a central venous catheter. Anesth Analg 72:
23. Arieff AI, Lazarowitz VC, Guisado R: Experimental dialysis 559560, 1991
disequilibrium syndrome: Prevention with glycerol. Kidney Int 49. Junglee NA, Rahman SU, Wild M, Wilms A, Hirst S, Jibani M,
14: 270278, 1978 Seale JR: When pure is not so pure: Chloramine-related
24. Rodrigo F, Shideman J, McHugh R, Buselmeier T, Kjellstrand C: hemolytic anemia in home hemodialysis patients. Hemodial
Osmolality changes during hemodialysis. Natural history, Int 14: 327332, 2010
clinical correlations, and influence of dialysate glucose and 50. Yoon J, Thapa S, Chow RD, Jaar BG: Hemolysis as a rare but
intravenous mannitol. Ann Intern Med 86: 554561, 1977 potentially life-threatening complication of hemodialysis: A
25. Barak M, Nakhoul F, Katz Y: Pathophysiology and clinical im- case report. BMC Res Notes 7: 475, 2014
plications of microbubbles during hemodialysis. Semin Dial 21: 51. Polaschegg HD: Red blood cell damage from extracorporeal
232238, 2008 circulation in hemodialysis. Semin Dial 22: 524531, 2009
26. Muth CM, Shank ES: Gas embolism. N Engl J Med 342: 476 52. Sweet SJ, McCarthy S, Steingart R, Callahan T: Hemolytic
482, 2000 reactions mechanically induced by kinked hemodialysis lines.
27. van Hulst RA, Klein J, Lachmann B: Gas embolism: Pathophysiology Am J Kidney Dis 27: 262266, 1996
and treatment. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 23: 237246, 2003 53. Manzler AD, Schreiner AW: Copper-induced acute hemolytic
28. Polaschegg HD: Hemodialysis machine air detectors need not anemia. A new complication of hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med
detect microbubbles. Artif Organs 31: 911912, 2007 73: 409412, 1970
29. Forsberg U, Jonsson P, Stegmayr C, Jonsson F, Nilsson B, 54. Techert F, Techert S, Woo L, Beck W, Lebsanft H, Wizemann V:
Nilsson Ekdahl K, Stegmayr B: A high blood level in the venous High blood flow rates with adjustment of needle diameter do
chamber and a wet-stored dialyzer help to reduce exposure for not increase hemolysis during hemodialysis treatment. J Vasc
Access 8: 252257, 2007
microemboli during hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 17: 612617,
55. Ham TH, Shen SC, Fleming EM, Castle WB: Studies on the
2013
destruction of red blood cells; thermal injury; action of heat in
30. Riddick L, Brogdon BG: Fatal air embolism during renal dialysis.
causing increased spheroidicity, osmotic and mechanical fra-
Am J Forensic Med Pathol 33: 110112, 2012
gilities and hemolysis of erythrocytes; observations on the
31. Tennankore KK, dGama C, Faratro R, Fung S, Wong E, Chan CT:
mechanisms of destruction of such erythrocytes in dogs and in a
Adverse technical events in home hemodialysis. Am J Kidney
patient with a fatal thermal burn. Blood 3: 373403, 1948
Dis 65: 116121, 2015
56. Berkes SL, Kahn SI, Chazan JA, Garella S: Prolonged
32. Wong B, Zimmerman D, Reintjes F, Courtney M, Klarenbach S,
hemolysis from overheated dialysate. Ann Intern Med 83: 363
Dowling G, Pauly RP: Procedure-related serious adverse events
364, 1975
among home hemodialysis patients: A quality assurance per- 57. Jepson R, Alonso E: Overheated dialysate: A case study and
spective. Am J Kidney Dis 63: 251258, 2014 review. Nephrol Nurs J 36: 551553, 2009
33. Keshavarzi G, Barber TJ, Yeoh G, Simmons A, Reizes JA: 58. Gault MH, Duffett S, Purchase L, Murphy J: Hemodialysis in-
Two-dimensional computational analysis of microbubbles in travascular hemolysis and kinked blood lines. Nephron 62:
hemodialysis. Artif Organs 37: E139E144, 2013 267271, 1992
34. Stegmayr B, Forsberg U, Jonsson P, Stegmayr C: The sensor in the 59. Malinauskas RA: Decreased hemodialysis circuit pressures
venous chamber does not prevent passage of air bubbles during indicating postpump tubing kinks: A retrospective investiga-
hemodialysis. Artif Organs 31: 162166, 2007 tion of hemolysis in five patients. Hemodial Int 12: 383393,
35. Wagner S, Rode C, Wojke R, Canaud B: Observation of mi- 2008
crobubbles during standard dialysis treatments. Clin Kidney J 8: 60. Duffy R, Tomashek K, Spangenberg M, Spry L, Dwyer D,
400404, 2015 Safranek TJ, Ying C, Portesi D, Divan H, Kobrenski J, Arduino M,
36. King MB, Harmon KR: Unusual forms of pulmonary embolism. Tokars J, Jarvis W: Multistate outbreak of hemolysis in hemo-
Clin Chest Med 15: 561580, 1994 dialysis patients traced to faulty blood tubing sets. Kidney Int 57:
37. Palmon SC, Moore LE, Lundberg J, Toung T: Venous air embo- 16681674, 2000
lism: A review. J Clin Anesth 9: 251257, 1997 61. Murcutt G: Guarding against hidden haemolysis during di-
38. Toung TJ, Rossberg MI, Hutchins GM: Volume of air in a lethal alysis: An overview. Summary of the EDTNA/ERCA Journal Club
venous air embolism. Anesthesiology 94: 360361, 2001 discussion Spring 2007. J Ren Care 33: 191195, 2007
39. Rossi UG, Torcia P, Rigamonti P, Colombo F, Giordano A, 62. Cherkas D: Traumatic hemorrhagic shock: Advances in fluid
Gallieni M, Cariati M: Tunneled central venous catheter ex- management. Emerg Med Pract 13: 119, 2011
change: Techniques to improve prevention of air embolism. 63. Bleeding Episodes during dialysis. Veterans Health Adminis-
J Vasc Access 17: 200203, 2016 tration Warning System. Available at: http://www.patientsafety.
40. Durant TM, Long J, Oppenheimer MJ: Pulmonary (venous) air va.gov/docs/alerts/BleedingEpisodesDuringDialysisAD09-02.
embolism. Am Heart J 33: 269281, 1947 pdf. Published 2008. Accessed July 1, 2016
41. Oppenheimer MJ, Durant TM, Lynch P: Body position in 64. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority: Hemodialysis Adminis-
relation to venous air embolism and the associated car- tration: Strategies to Ensure Safe Patient Care, 2010. Available
diovascular-respiratory changes. Am J Med Sci 225: 362373, at: http://patientsafetyauthority.org/ADVISORIES/AdvisoryLibrary/
1953 2010/Sep7(3)/Pages/87.aspx. Accessed March 16, 2016
42. Durant TM, Oppenheimer MJ, Lynch PR, Ascanio G, Webber D: 65. Axley B, Speranza-Reid J, Williams H: Venous needle dis-
Body position in relation to venous air embolism: A roentgen- lodgement in patients on hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J 39: 435
ologic study. Am J Med Sci 227: 509520, 1954 445, 2012
43. Geissler HJ, Allen SJ, Mehlhorn U, Davis KL, Morris WP, Butler 66. Polaschegg HD: Venous needle dislodgement: The pitfalls of
BD: Effect of body repositioning after venous air embolism. An venous pressure measurement and possible alternatives, a re-
echocardiographic study. Anesthesiology 86: 710717, 1997 view. J Ren Care 36: 4148, 2010
12 Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

67. Besarab A, Frinak S: The prevention of access failure: Pressure in anaphylactic reaction. J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 15631569,
monitoring. ASAIO J 44: 3537, 1998 1993
68. Ribitsch W, Schilcher G, Hafner-Giessauf H, Krisper P, Horina 92. Thomas M, Valette P, Mausset AL, Dejardin P: High molecular
JH, Rosenkranz AR, Schneditz D: Prevalence of detectable weight kininogen adsorption on hemodialysis membranes: In-
venous pressure drops expected with venous needle dislodge- fluence of pH and relationship with contact phase activation of
ment. Semin Dial 27: 507511, 2014 blood plasma. Influence of pre-treatment with poly(ethyl-
69. Redsense Medical: How it works. Available at: http://www. eneimine). Int J Artif Organs 23: 2026, 2000
redsensemedical.com/index.php/product/how-it-works. 93. Maheut H, Lacour F: Using AN69 ST membrane: A dialysis
Accessed September 1, 2016 centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16: 15191520,
70. Ahlmen J, Gydell KH, Hadimeri H, Hernandez I, Rogland B, 2001
Strombom U: A new safety device for hemodialysis. Hemodial 94. Greinacher A: CLINICAL PRACTICE. Heparin-induced throm-
Int 12: 264267, 2008 bocytopenia. N Engl J Med 373: 252261, 2015
71. Villarroel F, Ciarkowski AA: A survey on hypersensitivity reac- 95. TDOaPP Study: DOPPS Practice Monitor: Most Recent Trends
tions in hemodialysis. Artif Organs 9: 231238, 1985 in US Hemodialysis Practice. Available at: http://www.dopps.
72. Daugirdas JT, Ing TS, Roxe DM, Ivanovich PT, Krumlovsky F, org/dpm/DPMSlideBrowser.aspx. Accessed July 31, 2016
Popli S, McLaughlin MM: Severe anaphylactoid reactions to 96. Chertow GM, Mason PD, Vaage-Nilsen O, Ahlmen J: On the
cuprammonium cellulose hemodialyzers. Arch Intern Med relative safety of parenteral iron formulations. Nephrol Dial
145: 489494, 1985 Transplant 19: 15711575, 2004
73. Fishbane S: Safety in iron management. Am J Kidney Dis 41 97. Chertow GM, Mason PD, Vaage-Nilsen O, Ahlmen J: Update on
[Suppl]: 1826, 2003 adverse drug events associated with parenteral iron. Nephrol
74. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guideline for Dial Transplant 21: 378382, 2006
Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. 98. Wysowski DK, Swartz L, Borders-Hemphill BV, Goulding MR,
Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/Disinfection_Sterilization/ Dormitzer C: Use of parenteral iron products and serious
19_00glossary.html. Accessed May 1, 2016 anaphylactic-type reactions. Am J Hematol 85: 650654, 2010
75. Daugirdas JT, Ing TS: First-use reactions during hemodial- 99. Macdougall IC, Bircher AJ, Eckardt KU, Obrador GT, Pollock
ysis: A definition of subtypes. Kidney Int Suppl 24: S37S43, CA, Stenvinkel P, Swinkels DW, Wanner C, Weiss G, Chertow
1988 GM; Conference Participants: Iron management in chronic
76. Salem M, Ivanovich PT, Ing TS, Daugirdas JT: Adverse effects of kidney disease: Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improv-
dialyzers manifesting during the dialysis session. Nephrol Dial ing Global Outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference.
Transplant 9[Suppl 2]: 127137, 1994 Kidney Int 89: 2839, 2016
77. Sayeed K, Murdakes C, Spec A, Gashti C: Anaphylactic shock at 100. Auerbach M, Chaudhry M, Goldman H, Ballard H: Value of
the beginning of hemodialysis. Semin Dial 29: 8184, 2016 methylprednisolone in prevention of the arthralgia-myalgia
78. Boure T, Vanholder R: Which dialyser membrane to choose?
syndrome associated with the total dose infusion of iron
Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 293296, 2004
dextran: A double blind randomized trial. J Lab Clin Med 131:
79. Heegard KD, Tilley MA, Stewart IJ, Edgecombe HP, Lundy JB,
257260, 1998
Renz EM, Chung KK: Anaphylactoid reaction during first he-
101. Cancado RD, Mu~ noz M: Intravenous iron therapy: How far have
mofiltration with a PUREMA polysulfone membrane. Int J Artif
we come? Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 33: 461469, 2011
Organs 36: 363366, 2013
102. Auerbach M, Macdougall IC: Safety of intravenous iron for-
80. Ansorge W, Pelger M, Dietrich W, Baurmeister U: Ethylene
mulations: Facts and folklore. Blood Transfus 12: 296300,
oxide in dialyzer rinsing fluid: Effect of rinsing technique, di-
2014
alyzer storage time, and potting compound. Artif Organs 11:
103. Barton JC, Barton EH, Bertoli LF, Gothard CH, Sherrer JS: In-
118122, 1987
81. Muller TF, Seitz M, Eckle I, Lange H, Kolb G: Biocompatibility travenous iron dextran therapy in patients with iron deficiency
differences with respect to the dialyzer sterilization method. and normal renal function who failed to respond to or did not
Nephron 78: 139142, 1998 tolerate oral iron supplementation. Am J Med 109: 2732, 2000
82. Dolovich J, Bell B: Allergy to a product(s) of ethylene oxide gas: 104. Kasparek T, Rodriguez OE: What medical directors need to
Demonstration of IgE and IgG antibodies and hapten specificity. know about dialysis facility water management. Clin J Am Soc
J Allergy Clin Immunol 62: 3032, 1978 Nephrol 10: 10611071, 2015
83. Warkentin TE, Greinacher A: Heparin-induced anaphylactic 105. Ward RA: Water processing for hemodialysis. Part I: A historical
and anaphylactoid reactions: Two distinct but overlapping perspective. Semin Dial 10: 2631, 1997
syndromes. Expert Opin Drug Saf 8: 129144, 2009 106. Layman-Amato R, Curtis J, Payne GM: Water treatment for he-
84. Shu KH, Kao TW, Chiang WC, Wu VC: A case of anaphylactic modialysis: An update. Nephrol Nurs J 40: 383404, 2013
shock induced by FX60 polysulfone hemodialyzer but not F6- 107. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Emergency pre-
HPS polysulfone hemodialyzer. Hemodial Int 18: 841845, paredness for dialysis facilities. Available at: https://www.cms.
2014 gov/Medicare/End-Stage-Renal-Disease/ESRDNetworkOrgani-
85. Santosa A, Tan SH, Cheng YK: Recurrent intradialytic heparin zations/downloads/emergencypreparednessforfacilities2.pdf.
induced anaphylaxis: Workup and management. Asia Pac Al- Accessed July 31, 2016
lergy 3: 285288, 2013 108. Fluck S, McKane W, Cairns T, Fairchild V, Lawrence A, Lee J,
86. Ebo DG, Bosmans JL, Couttenye MM, Stevens WJ: Haemo- Murray D, Polpitiye M, Palmer A, Taube D: Chloramine-induced
dialysis-associated anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions. haemolysis presenting as erythropoietin resistance. Nephrol
Allergy 61: 211220, 2006 Dial Transplant 14: 16871691, 1999
87. Rampton D, Folkersen J, Fishbane S, Hedenus M, Howaldt S, 109. Eaton JW, Kolpin CF, Swofford HS, Kjellstrand CM, Jacob HS:
Locatelli F, Patni S, Szebeni J, Weiss G: Hypersensitivity reac- Chlorinated urban water: A cause of dialysis-induced hemolytic
tions to intravenous iron: Guidance for risk minimization and anemia. Science 181: 463464, 1973
management. Haematologica 99: 16711676, 2014 110. Davidovits M, Barak A, Cleper R, Krause I, Gamzo Z, Eisenstein
88. Ward RA: Ultrapure dialysate. Semin Dial 17: 489497, 2004 B: Methaemoglobinaemia and haemolysis associated with hy-
89. Tielemans C, Madhoun P, Lenaers M, Schandene L, Goldman drogen peroxide in a paediatric haemodialysis centre: A
M, Vanherweghem JL: Anaphylactoid reactions during hemo- warning note. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18: 23542358, 2003
dialysis on AN69 membranes in patients receiving ACE inhib- 111. de Torres JP, Strom JA, Jaber BL, Hendra KP: Hemodialysis-
itors. Kidney Int 38: 982984, 1990 associated methemoglobinemia in acute renal failure. Am J
90. Verresen L, Fink E, Lemke HD, Vanrenterghem Y: Bradykinin is a Kidney Dis 39: 13071309, 2002
mediator of anaphylactoid reactions during hemodialysis with 112. de Oliveira RM, de los Santos CA, Antonello I, dAvila D:
AN69 membranes. Kidney Int 45: 14971503, 1994 Warning: An anemia outbreak due to chloramine exposure in a
91. Schulman G, Hakim R, Arias R, Silverberg M, Kaplan AP, Arbeit clean hemodialysis unitan issue to be revisited. Ren Fail 31:
L: Bradykinin generation by dialysis membranes: Possible role 8183, 2009
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol : cccccc, , 2016 Hemodialysis Emergencies, Saha et al. 13

113. Newbigging N, Peel W, Bell E, Isles C: Unexpected cyanosis in a 123. Saeed F, Kousar N, Sinnakirouchenan R, Ramalingam VS,
haemodialysis patient-did someone add hydrogen peroxide to Johnson PB, Holley JL: Blood loss through AV fistula: A case
the dialysis water? NDT Plus 2: 158160, 2009 report and literature review. Int J Nephrol 2011: 350870, 2011
114. Barker SJ, Tremper KK, Hyatt J: Effects of methemoglobinemia 124. Ball LK: Fatal vascular access hemorrhage: Reducing the odds.
on pulse oximetry and mixed venous oximetry. Anesthesiology Nephrol Nurs J 40: 297303, 2013
70: 112117, 1989 125. Kliger AS: Patient safety in the dialysis facility. Blood Purif 24:
115. Guay J: Methemoglobinemia related to local anesthetics: A 1921, 2006
summary of 242 episodes. Anesth Analg 108: 837845, 2009 126. Thomas-Hawkins C, Flynn L, Clarke SP: Relationships between
116. Hoenich NA: Disinfection of the hospital water supply: A hid- registered nurse staffing, processes of nursing care, and nurse-
den risk to dialysis patients. Crit Care 13: 1007, 2009 reported patient outcomes in chronic hemodialysis units.
117. Bek MJ, Laule S, Reichert-Junger C, Holtkamp R, Wiesner M, Nephrol Nurs J 35: 123130, 2008
Keyl C: Methemoglobinemia in critically ill patients during 127. Davis KK, Harris KG, Mahishi V, Bartholomew EG, Kenward K:
extended hemodialysis and simultaneous disinfection of the Perceptions of culture of safety in hemodialysis centers.
hospital water supply. Crit Care 13: R162, 2009 Nephrol Nurs J 43: 119126, 2016
118. Arnow PM, Bland LA, Garcia-Houchins S, Fridkin S, Fellner SK: 128. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Guidance for
An outbreak of fatal fluoride intoxication in a long-term he- Performing Root Cause Analysis with Performance Improve-
modialysis unit. Ann Intern Med 121: 339344, 1994 ment projects, 2010. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/
119. Mohapatra M, Anand S, Mishra BK, Giles DE, Singh P: Review medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/qapi/
of fluoride removal from drinking water. J Environ Manage 91: downloads/guidanceforrca.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2016
6777, 2009 129. Simon P, Potier J, Thebaud HE: Risk factors for acute hyper-
120. Gill JR, Storck K, Kelly S: Fatal exsanguination from hemodialysis sensitivity reactions in hemodialysis. Nephrologie 17:
vascular access sites. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8: 259262, 2012 163170, 1996
121. Georgiadis GS, Lazarides MK, Panagoutsos SA, Kantartzi KM,
Lambidis CD, Staramos DN, Vargemezis VA: Surgical revision
Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.
of complicated false and true vascular access-related aneu-
rysms. J Vasc Surg 47: 12841291, 2008 cjasn.org.
122. Pasklinsky G, Meisner RJ, Labropoulos N, Leon L, Gasparis AP,
Landau D, Tassiopoulos AK, Pappas PJ: Management of true This article contains supplemental material online at http://cjasn.
aneurysms of hemodialysis access fistulas. J Vasc Surg 53: asnjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2215/CJN.05260516/-/
12911297, 2011 DCSupplemental.