Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
phase angle,
= (2 ) scattering angle,
(solar) elongation
Sun
Albedo & Phase Function (2)
4 r2
l ( ) W ( ) lS ( ) 1 W ( ) lL ( ); l 1, 2
Simpler, more symmetric, but
slightly less accurate expression
W ( ) exp 90.56 tan 2
2
Bl
Cl sin l ( ) exp Al tan ; l 1, 2
lS ( ) 1 2
0.119 1.341 sin 0.754 sin2
A1 3.33, A2 1.87,
Bl
lL ( ) exp Al tan B1 0.63, B2 1.22
2
A1 3.332, A2 1.862,
B1 0.631, B2 1.218,
C1 0.986, C2 0.238
Obtaining H & G (1)
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
I i 10 0.4Vi ( i ) ; i 1,, n
Buktikan
j ( i ) k ( i )
h jk ; i 1,, n; j , k 1, 2
i2
j ( i ) Ii
gj ; i 1,, n; j 1, 2
i2
a1 (h22 g1 h12 g 2 ) / D
D h11h22 h12
2
a2 (h11g 2 h12 g1 ) / D
Obtaining H & G (2)
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
Thus, H 2.5 log a a
1 2 0.15 for low albedo
G 0.25 for moderate albedo
a2 0.40 for high albedo
G
a1 a2
Phase integral q = 0.290 + 0.684 G
H & G Error Analysis
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
Magnitude residuals ri Vi ( i ) H m( i )
m( i ) 2.5 log (1 G )1( i ) G 2 ( i )
m(i) is the calculated magnitude drop from zero phase angle
Then,
/
i
; i
2
2
1
1/ ;
1/ i
0 2 H ( 0 ) 2
i
2
1 2
1
2
; s r / i ;
/ i2 0 1/ i n2
2 2 2 i
i
H ( 0 ) s H ( ) ; s ;
0
G ;
0.0673 0.1132 G 0.0615 G 2
H ( ) V (1, ) H 2 ( 0 ) 2 ( 0 )2
Drawbacks
The H,G-magnitude system fails to fit the
narrow opposition effects of E-class asteroids
(Harris et al. 1986)
It shows poor fits to the phase curves of certain
dark asteroids (e.g., Piiroen et al. 1994,
Shevchenko et al. 1996)
Hapkes photometric model (5 parameters) has
photometric fits as good as the H,G-magnitude
system (Verbiscer & Veverka 1995)
Lightcurve Amplitude Phase Angle Relation
0.030 deg-1 for S - type
A( )
Zappala et al. (1990) A(0 )
0.015 deg-1 for C - type
1 0.013 deg-1 for M - type
a
b
a
log10 0.4 A(0 )
b
Examples
Asteroid Cometary Asteroid
Asteroid (832) Karin C/2002 CE10
11.2 12
11.6 12.92
13
11.8
13.5
12.0
14
12.2
14.5
12.4
12.6 15
0 5 10 15 20 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
Phase Angle (deg) Phase Angle ( )