Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
in of
The WorldBank
FOROFCIL USEONY
PROJECTCOMPLETION
REPORT
Public Disclosure Authorized
PAKISTAN
TARBELA
DAMPROJECT
September15, 1986
Public Disclosure Authorized
OperationsEvaluationDepartment
TERMS OF MEASUREMENT
Office
of D,wto.GaswaI
opsratwme EvaiuatiaA
MEM4ORANDIUM
TO THE EXECUTIVEDIRECTORSANDTHE PRESIDENT
Attachment
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance
of their officialduties Its contents may not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Dank authorization.
FOR OMCIL USE ONLY
PROJECTPERFORMANCE
AUDITREPORT
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAM PROJECT
(LOAN548-PAK,AND CREDITS581-AND 771-PAX)
TABLEOF CONTENTS
PageNo.
Preface .......................................**..*******..**....* i
Basic Data Sheet ................. . ........................... iii
Evaluation Summary .... ......................................
....... iv
PROJECTPERFORMANCE
AUDITMEMORANDUM
Formulation
and Design .... 1
................................
Implementation................ *.*.*S...***************** 3
Impact *.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.. 5
PROJECTCOMPLETION
REPORT
I* Introduction ......... , ..................................23
II. Background0000. ..........................
* 26
III. Project Formulation .................................30
IV. PrincipalProject Features ................................32
V. ProjectAdministrationand Management 33
.....................
VI. Project Implementation ....................................38
VII. Remedial/RepairProgram ........................... 42
VIII. Future Work ................. 45
4..........,
IX. OperatingPerformance ........................... 48
X. Financial Performance *.................................. 50
XI. InstitutionalPerformanceand Development................. 51
XII. EconomicRe-evaluation..... o...... ....................... 53
XIII.Bank Performance ............. ............
..............
* 57
X'V. Conclusions ..........................................59
Annexes , ....
, . ..............................
, 63
Map IBRDNo. 3891(PCR)
PAKIS'iAN
TARBELADAM PROJECT
(LOAN548-PAK, ANDCREDITS581- AND771-PAK)
PREFACE
The draft report was sent to the Borroweron April 9, 1986 for
comments. Commentsreceivedfrom WAPDA are attachedas an appendixto tile
PPAM.
AUDIT REPORT
PROJECTPERFORMANCE
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAMPROJECT
(LOAN 548-PAlt CREDITS581- AND771-PAK)/a
BASIC DATASHEET
KEY PROJECTDATA
Initial Actual or Actual as S of
Estimate Estimated Actual Initial Estimate
DISBURSEMENTS
CUMULATIVE
FY69 FY70 FY71 FY72 FY73 FY74 FY75 FY76 FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82
Initial estimate (USS in)
Actual (USS million)
Actual as X of Appraisal estimate
Dates of Final Disbursement: Ln. 548-PAK 11/16/76; Cr. 581-PAR 01/13/76; Cr. 771-PAK 09/09/81.
STAFF INPUTS /f
FY68-72 FY73 FY74 FY75 FY76 FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 FY85
MISSION DATA
OTHERPROJECT DATA
/a Bank acts as Administrator of Tarbela Development Fund which includes not only these loans and credits,
but also contributions from several bilateral contributors 'Tarbela Development Fund Agreement
(1968) and from Pakistan.
/b Does not include costs of remedial/repair program.
7; Includes costs of remedial/repair program.
7; Final completion was delayed by repair of a series of damaging events (see Chapter VII, PCR)
7T US$7.06 million equivalent disbursed. Difference due to fluctuations in values of the several
currencies.
/f Source, Planning and Budgetting Department - in staff weeks
e - engineer, n - loan officer.
7i 1 - Problem-free or Minor Problems; 2 - Moderate Problems and 3 - Major Problema.
7W I - Improving; 2 - Stationary; 3 - Deteriorating.
TI T - Technical; F - Financial.
- iv -
PROJECTPERFORMANCEAUDIT REPORT
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAM PROJECT
(LOAN548-PAK,AND CREDITS581- AND 771-PAK)
EVALUATIONSUMMARY
Introduction
Objectives
Implementation
Experience
Sustainability
Findingsand Lessons
PROJECTPERFORMANCEAUDITMEMORANDUM
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAMPROJECT
(LOAN 548-PAK,AND CREDITS581- AND 771-PAK)
I. SUMMARY
Formulationand Design
Implementation
13. When the accident occurred the GOP gave instructionsthat first
priorityshouldbe given to res zoringthe works in time for the next filling
of the reservoirand appointeda Cabinet Committeeon Tarbela to monitor
- 4 -
progress and resolve difficulties. The Bank arrangedfor one of its Vice
Presidentsto lead the work of the Bank, in its capacityas Administrator of
the Indus and TarbelaDevelopmentFunds, in the measuresnecessaryto restore
the situationfollowingthe mishaps during the first fillingof the reser-
voir. He visitedPakistanin October and December1974 and in February1975
to discuss the requiredprogram of remedialmeasures and to review action
required on potential problems. After each of these missions, Special
Reportsby the Administrator were sent to the partiesof the Indus Fund and
TarbelaDevelopmentFund Agreementsand oral reportswere made to the Execu-
tive Directors. As soon as the nature and extentof the damagewere known,a
programof repairworks was startedand the projectengineersalo0 prepareda
program of additionalworks designedto increasethe safety of the project
during the next filling. Good progresswas made with implementingthese pro-
grams, and all the work which had to be carried out before the reservoir
again began to fill in June 1975 was finishedin time. At that point, it
appearedthat some additionalremedialworks costingUS$62.2millionwere all
that remainedto be completed. Hitherto,it had been possibleto meet the
costs of repairand remedialworks from resourcesremainingin the TDF, pend-
ing the completionof final project works; these resourcesnow had to be
replacedto permitfinal completionof the project.
Impact
A. EconomicEvaluation
27. Note in passingthat the PCR and PPAM use a least cost alternative
(economic) approach to valuing electric power, rather than a revenue
(financial)approach;both methodologieshave been used on Bank power pro-
jects. The least cost alternativeapproach is defensibleif there is an
adequate,sustainedmarket demand for the product produced,a requirement
which is amply m,htin the case of Tarbela'spower. But there are also
pragmaticreasons for using this approachexclusivelyfor Tarbela. First,
the comparisonand aggregationof power and irrigationbenefits demand
reasonablyconformablemeasuresof them, preferablyeconomicones. Second,
the TDF financed neither power generationequipmentnor irrigationcanal
works, and the various loan and credit agreements contain no specific
covenantson cost recovery;in consequence,the PCR providesno information
on Tarbela-generatedfinancialrevenuesfrom either poweror irrigation.
9/ The Region notes that some of its main concernswith the operational
usefulnessof the DOM model are outlinedin a memo from the agricultural
Divisionconcernedto Duloy,dated 12/2/82. It notes furtherthat OED
raised similar concerns in a Study Audit Memorandum,dated 6/5/85,
addressedto the Bank's ResearchAdministrator, Economicsand Research
Staff.
- 12 -
B. IrrigationWater Allocation
out the kind of study which gave rise to the DOM and like analysesdealing
with Tarbela'simpact on agriculture. Its results, notwithstanding their
controversialnature,are suggestivethat changesin water allocationpolicy
would be highlycomplementarywith furtherengineeringinvestments in irriga-
tion water supply. Devisingdesirablepolicy changes that are politically
acceptableis a notablechallenge. The inventionof such optionsdeservesat
least as much feasibilitystudy as post-Tarbelainvestmentsin development
hardware.1 !/
C. Water ResourcePlanning
11/ The Region comments that it has used various forums of high level
discussion in the past to induce GOP to address this issue, and that it
intends to continue its efforts.
- 14 -
D. CofinancingThroughDevelopmentFunds
45. The audit believesthat the Bank would have mdnaged its responsi-
bilitiesmore consistentlyhad it tried in other respectsto treat Tarbela
like any other projectwithin the Bank from the beginning,and designateda
project officerwho preparedregularinternalreportswhich were subject to
the same review as other supervisionreports. Granted that such reports
46. Note again that this "issue"arises from the unique characterof
the Bank's supervisionarrangementsup to 1980. The PCR complimentsthe
Bank'sperformance(paras.13.01-13.04), especiallyits role duringthe early
phase of remedial/repair (when many outstandingBank staff were conscript8
to work on Tarbela),and the audit has found no evidencethat would dispute
these compliments. But there is clearly a procedurallesson here for the
Bank in case it againacts as Administratorof a specialfund.
E. Prioritiesin ProjectEmergencies
47. What stands out above all else in the Tarbelasaga is the way the
responsiblepartiesextricatedthe projectfrom the threatof even more seri-
ous damagesthan it sustainedin the 1974 tunnel collapseand in subsequent
difficulties.The PCR notes that
Mr Otto Maiss
Acting Director
Operations Evaluation Department
1818 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20433
U.S.A.
General Manager
Dams and Coordination
Encls-as above
cc: Ministry of Water & Power, Government of
Pakistan, Islamabad w/enl
Attention: Mr Navaid All Nasri
Joint Secretary (W)
with reference to Telex
Message No.UA-8(257)/86
dated June 3, 1986 N
I
Nl "S
X~~~~~~
bG~~~L IT
1,,I
- 19 - ,Appendix
i. CROP YIELDS
CONFIDENTIAL
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAMPROJECT
PROJECTCOMPLETION
REPORT
April 1984
Irrigation I Division
South Asia ProjectsDepartment
( -"I ,
-3 ~~ ~ ~ fi 1
hef' >,fo /_
,vk/A
- 25 -
PAKISTAN
DAI PROJECT
TARBELA
PROJECTCOMPLETION
REPORT
CHAPTERI. INTRODUCTION
CHAPTERII. BACKGROUND
(b) Six barrages to make diversions from the main rivers; and
CHAITERIII. PROJECTFORMULATION
3.02 From the outset and to this day, Tarbelahas requireda sustained
international fundingeffort. The other Indusworks (para2.05) had consumed
the bulk of the originaland supplemental IndusBasin Funds leavingan insuf-
ficientbalanceavailablefor constructionof a dam on the Indus. The
estimatedbalanceremainingin the Indus Fund after financingManglaDam and
the barragesand link canalswas US$324M, about two-thirdsof the then
estimatedtotalfunds reqviredfor Tarbela.
CHAPTERIV. PRINCIPALPROJECTFEATURES
CHAPTERV. PROJECTADMINISTRATION
AND MA4AGENENT
5.08 Under the Agreementsof 1968, 1975, 1978 and 1980 1/ the Bank acts as
Administrator for the Projectand disbursesall funds contributed.In its
capacityas Administrator of TDF, the Bank receivesthe contributions from
the parties,includingthe transferfrom IBDF,holds the assetsof the Fund
in trust,and disbursesthe resourcesof the Fund to meet expenditures of the
Project. The Bank, as Administrator, is also responsiblefor the general
supervisionof the Projecton behalfof the partiesto the Agreements,and
providestechnicalassistanceas needed. The Bank providescontributorsand
other interestedpartieswith semi-annualprogressreportsand also prepares
quarterlyfinancialstatements.
5.09 As Administrator
of IBDF and TDF, the Bank representedthe interna-
tionalcommunityof lendersand donors. The need to give prudentmanagement
to thesefunds,togetherwith the large contributions by Pakistan,for a
constructionprogramof unprecedented magnitudecomplicatedby the Tarbela
remedial/repairprogramresultedin very broad and deep involvement by the
Bank; beyondfund managementinto projectmanagement,administration, techni-
cal analysisand technical decisions. The Bank was greatly assistedin this
work by Sir AlexanderGibb & Partners.
5.16 These special procedures introduced the risk of diffusing the Project
Consultant:s' responsibilities and as soon as possible procedures for techni-
cal control and decision making reverted to the former format.
5.19 During the period of initial repairs in 1974/75 the limited time
available between flood seasons to carry out repairs and additional works and
the changed nature of the work made it impractical to use existing rates
under the contract. The work had to be carried out on a cost plus basis,
since it was being both designed and constructed under an accelerated program
which left little time for advance planning. Orders for materials for
example had to be placed on the basis of certain assumptions which could only
be confirmed when the damage had been fully assessed and the remedial work
decided upon.
5.20 The return to normal procedures was progressive: the 1977/78 works
were carried out under contract at rates which were negotiated as the work
progressed; the 1979/80 works were carried out under a similar contract but
with rates negotiated in advance; and the conversion of stilling basin 4 to
twin flip-buckets was put out to international tender after full review of
design and documents, and prequalification of tenderers.
5.22 Following the incidents at Tarbela in 1974 and 1975, claims totalling
US$49.9 million equivalent were lodged against the insurers. The insurers
rejected these claims on the contention that the loss was caused by defective
design and/or non-fortuitous events. The delay in the settlemeat of the
claim faced Pakistan with severe problems particularly since it was clear
that considerable additional funds were needed immediately for repairs.
Arbitration proceedings were instituted by the owner and each party retained
counsel in London. Discussions were held and eventually the insurers offered
US$16 million in final settlement of the claims. This offer was accepted by
the owner in light of advice that litigation would be protracted and expen-
sive, and its outcome uncertain.
- 38 -
CHAPTERVI. PROJECTIMPLEMENTATION
6.01 The Tarbela Dam Project was constructed under a single major con-
tract. One nominatedsubcontractor and numerousother subcontractors were
employedfor specializedwork.
6.02 Prime Contract. The prime contractfor the constructionof the Civil
EngineeringWorks of the TarbelaDam Projectwas a unit pricecontractincor-
poratingconditionscommon to the contractsfor the variouscomponentsof the
IBP; theseconditions,in turn were based on the widely-accepted1st edition
of the FIDIC form. The prime contractcomprisedthe construction, completion
and initialmaintenanceof the whole of the works, includingthe powerhouse
building,and provisionof all labour,materialsand construction plant. The
gates, power units, switchgear,cables,etc.,were manufacturedunder
separatecontractsmanagedby WAPDA but the civil works contractorwas
requiredto collectthese items at point of manufacture,ship to site and
completeirstallation.
PROGRAM
CHAPTERVII. REMEDIAL/REPAIR
Primarylessonslearnedare:
CHAPTERVIII. FUTUREWORK
8.01 The program of construction of the Tarbela Dam Project which began
in 1968,extendedthroughcompletionof initialfacilitiesand includedthe
remedial/repair program,will be completedin 1984. Initialoperationand
maintenance(O&M) activitiesbegan in 1975.The transitionfrom construction
- 47 -
8.03 The O&M programof TarbelaDam Projectis very large. The develop-
ment of this program,with its requirementsfor skilledpersonnel,proper
equipment,adequateworkshopsand suppliesand adequateand availablefinanc-
of which
ing, has been beset by a number of problems,the most significant
are:
(d) The lower total remunerationof the civil O&M staffby comparison
with others at site and other factorshas made it difficultto
recruitand retain staff.
(g) The sheer size and complexityof the facilitiesand the unexpected
problemsthat have been encounteredmake clear that the program
of maintenancewill be largerthan previouslyenvisioned.
Safetymust remainthe key concern.
8.04 As noted in paras 8.03 (b) and 8.03 (e), fundingfor O&M has been a
problem. To providea portionof the initialinventoryof 0&14equipment,
workshops,workshopequipment,supplies,tools,trainingand technicalassis-
tance, aboutUS$35.4M in foreignexchangefor O&M purposeshas been made
availablefrom varioussources;in January1980 US$3.2M was providedfrom
insurancerecoveries,in March 1980,US$6.5M was providedfrom the EEC
SpecialAction Credit (51-PAK)and US$1.5M was availablefrom the loan from
Abu Dhabi. In addition,in April 1983,an agreementwas signedwhereby
US$10.2M was providedby the Bank under Loan Agreement2247-PAK. Also, in
June 1983, US$14.0M equivalentwas made availableby UK throughthe UK
OverseasDevelopmentAdministration.
(b) strengthening
the piers of the ServiceSpillwayheadworks,
(c) strengtheningthe hoist towersfor the outletgates of Tunnels3,
4 and 5, and
(b) the wedge will reach the dam in about 1995 but probablynot
before that date; and
(c) the top slopeof the wedge will be about 2.5 ft/mile,and the
depth of the sedimentsat the dam will be about200 feet.
1975/76 3.33 -
1976/77 9.07 138.3
1977/78 10.00 3,367.2
1978/79 8.71 3,726.0
1979/80 9.91 4,123.0
1980/81 10.63 4,128.8
1981/82 11.33 4,200.5
1982/83 9.12 5,228.2/a
9.04 Developmentof O&M Program. The O&M programfor Tarbelahas been the
subjectof continuingdialoguebe-tween WAPDA and the Bank with the objective
of developinga fully comprehensivescheme. The firstseparatebudget for
theseactivitieswas made in 1976. The O&M organization has progressively
had an expandedrole, takingover responsibility and controlof civil, elec-
tricaland mechanicalfacilitiesupon completionby the construction contrac-
tors. Planningand implementation of the O&M programis the responsibility
of WAPDA. TAMS has developedthe necessarymonitoringorganization, com-
pleteddetaileddrawings,gatheredmanufacturersinstructions, and is cur-
rentlypreparingoperationand maintenancemanuals for WAPDA O&M staff. Gibb
has been continuouslyreviewingthe evolvingO&M program.
- 51 -
9.06 The Tarbela Dam Project Office is headed by a General Manager and
Project Director who reports to Member Water at WAPDA headquarters in Lahore.
The General Manager and Project Director is responsible for all civil
facilities including the repair/remedial program. The Tarbela Power Plant is
headed by a Chief Engineer and Project Director who reports to the General
Manager, Generation at WAPDA headquarters in Lahore. The Chief Engineer and
Project Director is responsible for the powerhouse 0&M and additions to
generation facilities. He also is responsible for 0OM of the spillway and
tunnel gates. This division between water and power interests at all levels
in WAPDAhas been a concern to the Bank since it could lead to lack of coor-
dination and duplication of resources. The matter is under consideration by
Chairman, WAPDA.
ChAPTERX. FINANCIALPERFORMANCE
10.08 The Bank has been Administrator of both funds throughthis long
periodand playedan importantrole in fund mobilization.In the management
of IBDF and TDF the Bank wqasgreatlyassistedby Sir AlexanderGibb & Part-
ners (para5.07).
CHAPTERXII. ECONOMICRE-EVALUATION
Overview
4/ Para 8.08.
- 58 -
CHAPTERXIV. CONCLUSIONS
14.03 TarbelaDam, the last and largeststructureof all was begun in 1968
and also stayedon schedule. Bringingit into operationwas delayedby one
year, from 1974 to 1975, by the unexpectedand largedamageson initial
fillingof the reservoir(para7.01). But the continuedinternational
cooperativeeffort,focusedby all partieson the changedsituation,enabled
the work of repairand completionto continuewithoutdelay and without
interruptingthe operationof the Tarbelafacilitiesto producenew water
suppliesand electricpower.
arrangements
14.08 The organizational which includedagreementson
controland Fund management(paras5.13 et seq.)workedwell
decision-making,
at Tarbela.
14.10 The Bank was greatlyassistedas Administrator of IBDF and TDF by Sir
AlexanderGibb & Partnersand employmentof a similarconsultantwith similar
roles shouldbe consideredin the futurefor large projectswhere the Bank
has major involvement.
14.13 The problemsat Tarbelacan now be seen to have been for the most
at the then existinglevelsof knowledge
part exceptionaland unforeseeable
and experience.
14.16 There should have been more planning and provision for O&M,including
funds for O&M facilities, equipment, spare parts and supplies, together with
preparation for O&M including staffing and training (para 8.06).
14.18 The key to the long-term safety of Tarbela lies in the hands of the
O&Morganization. Close attention, regular inspections, strong management,
adequate financial resources and national recognition of the unique and
critical nature of Tarbela will clearly be required to develop and carry out
the necessarily strong O&Mprogram (para 9.03).
14.19 Recently completed studies indicate the possible need for some addi-
tional future capital works in the mid to late 1980s. These include addi-
tional protection of the plunge pool of the Service Spillway, strengthening
of piers and hoist towers, means to restrain or manage the sediment delta in
the event of an earthquake and contingency plans to unclog tunnels should
they be blocked by a sediment slide (para 8.07).
14.21 Tarbela Dam Project has made all planned water deliveries since 1975
and all planned production of electric power since 1976 in spite of the great
activity and demands of the remedial/repair program (para 9.01).
14.22 The new water supplies made available by Tarbela have not yet been
fully Integrated into the nation's water system. Further, complementary
programs for increasing agricultural production have moved slowly (para
11.04).
PAISTAN
TARBELA
DANPROJECTCOMPLETION
REPORT
Main Embankment Dam and Blanket. The main embankment dam has a
maximumheightof 143 m (470 ft) and a crest lengthof 2,740m (9,000ft).
The dam has a slopingimperviouscore supportedby well gradedgranular
shells. The core is a blend of angularcobblegraveland silt. Integral
with the dam, as an extensionof the imperviouscore, is an upstreamblanket
covering nearly 500 ha (1,235 ac) of the reservoirfloor. The blanket
providesunder-seepage controlfor the foundationof the dam which is com-
posed of deep alluvialdepositsof cobble graveland sand up to 210 a
(700 ft) deep. The upstream shells are of granular material and
free-draining for stabilization of the upstreamslope on reservoirdrawdown.
The upstreamslope is protectedagainstwave actionby riprap. Downstream
zones interceptdrainageand seepageand supportthe core. The downstream
slope is protectedagainstrain water erosionby a layerof stableand
free-draining material.
Auxiliary Dam No. 2. This relatively small dam closes a low saddle
between the Auxiliary and Service Spillways. Its cross-section is similar
to the main dam exceptit has a steepercore in contactwith the rock founda-
tion, with no upstreamblanket.
PAKISTAN
PROJECT STATISTICS
Construction Period
Beginning of Construction November 1968
Stage I, River in Natural bed 2-1/2 years
Stage II, River in Excavated Channel 3 years
Stage III, River Diverted through
Tunnels 1 year
Complete Initial Power Installation 1-1/2 years
Total 8 years
Reservoir
Retention Level (Maximum Storage) 472.44 m 1,550 feet SPD 1/
Drawdown Level
Design (Dead Storage Level) 396.24 m 1,300 feet SPD
Assumed for Turbine Operation
(Minimum Power Level) 405.99 m 1,332 feet SPD
Storage Volume:
At Elevation 1,550 feet (472.42 m) 13.7 BCM 11.1 MAF
At Elevation 1,332 feet (405.97 m) 3.1 BCM 2.5 MAF
At Elevation 1,300 feet (396.22 m) 2.2 BCM 1.8 MAF
leAngthof Reservoir 80.0 km 50 miles
Maximum Width of Reservoir
(Excluding Siran Arm) 4.8 km 3 miles
Maximum Depth 137.0 + m 450 + feet
Main Dan
Type - Earth and rockfill with
impervious cores; foundation
seepage control by upstream
impervious blanket and downstream
relief wells.
AuxiliaryDam No. 1
Type - Earth and rockfill founded
on alluviumwith slopingimpervious
core and blanketextendingto
bedrock.
Crest Elevation 477.01m 1,565feet SPD
CrestLength 713 m 2,340 feet
MaximumHeight 105 m 345 feet
Side Slopes
Upstream 1 in 2.65 -
Downstream 1 in 2.0 -
Volume 15 mcm 20 millioncu yds
AuxiliaryDam No. 2
Type - Earth and rockfill founded
on rock with imperviouscore to
bedrock.
Crest Elevation 477.01m 1,565feet SPD
Crest Length 262 m 860 feet
MaximumHeight 68.58m 225 feet
Volume 1.5 mcm 2 millioncu yds
Spillways (Two)
Type - Gated channels forming
Serviceand Auxiliaryspillways
excavatedin the rock on the
left bank,concrete-lined from
their crests to flip-buckets,
lined plungepools with outfall
channelto the river.
Crest level 454.76m 1,492feet SPD
Gates
Service Spillway (7) 15.24 x 17.68 m 50 x 58 ft
AuxiliarySpillay(9) 15.24x 17.68 m 50 x 58 ft
DischargeCapacityat Elevation
1550feet (472.42m)
ServiceSpillway 18,400cumecs 650,000cusecs
AuxiliarySpillway 23,800cumecs 840,000cusecs
- 69 - ANNEX2
Page 3
DesignFlood
MaximumInflow 60,237 cumecs 2,127,000 cusecs
MaximumOutflow
At Elevation1,500feet (472.42 m) 42,200 cumecs 1,490,000 cusec8
At Elevation1*556*8 feet (474.49 m) 47,295 cumecs 1,670,000 cusecs
MaximumFloodsof Recordat Attock
August 27-30, 1929 (Gauged) 24,780 cumecs 875,000cusecs
1841- GreatestKnown (Estimated) 56,640cumecs 2,000,000 cusecs
OutletWork
Four concrete-lined
tunnels,each 45
feet (13.7 m) diameter up to gate
2,400 to 2,700 feet (730
structures,
to 820 m) long. Service gates - two
13.5 feet x 45 feet (4.1 x 13.7 m)
fixed-wheelgates in each tunnelplus
two bulkheadgates of same size
upstreamof servicegates. Tunnels1,
2 and 3 steel-lineddownstreamof gate
structure,43.5 feet (13*3 m) diameter.
Tunnel 4, steel-lineddownstreamof gate
structure,36 feet (11 m) diameter.
Tunnel4 controlledfor irrigation
releasesby two 16 feet wide x 24 feet
(4.9x 7.3 m) high radial gates at
downstreamend. Tunnel 3 similarly
controlled.
IntakeSill Levels
Tunnels1 and 2 373.38 m 1,225 feet SPD
Tunnels3 and 4 353.57 m 1,160feet SPD
EstimatedDischargeCapacityof
Tunnel4
At Elevation1,300 feet 1,770 cumecs 62,500 cusecs
At Elevation1,332 feet 1,883 cumecs 66,500 cusecs
EstimatedDischargeCapacityof each
of Three PowerTunnels (Controlled
by Four Turbine-bypass Valve Units)
At Elevation1,300feet 493 cumecs 17,400cusecs
At Elevation1,332 feet 538 cumecs 19,000cusecs
ReleaseCapabilityPresentDevelopment,
one IrrigationTunnel plus 10 Turbine-
bypassValve Units
At Elevation1,300 feet 3,002 cumecs 106,000cusecs
At Elevation1,332 feet 3,285 cumecs 116,000 cusecs
At Elevation1,492 feet 4,361 cumecs 154,000 cusecs
- 70 - ANNEX2
Page 4
Power Plant
PresentInstallation- 8 turbine
generatorunits, 4 each on tunnels
1 and 2. Two additionalunits on
Tunnel 2 to be completedin 1985.
Turbines- Francistype, 239,000HP
at 136.4 rev/minat 378 feet (115m)
net designhead.
Generators- Rated 175 MW but capable
of 15 percentcontinuousover load
MaximumNormalTailwaterElevation 339.83m 1,115feet SPD
MinimumTailwaterElevation(1 Unit) 335.26m 1,110feet SPD
MaximumNet Head 133.19m 437 feet
MinimumNet Head 55.77m 183 feet
INTERNATIONAL
COMPARISONS
1/
1/ As of 1980.
- 71 - ANNEX 2
Page 5
Tarbela
ServiceSpillwayat 294,000cusecs,11 millionH1 1/
AuxiliarySpillwayat 240,000cusecs,9 millionHP 1/
cf. Kariba (Rhodesia)at 213,000cusecs,7.2 millionHP.
Tarbela
4 Tunnels 13.7m (45 ft) diameteru/s, 730 and 820 m
(2,400and 2,700ft) long. (17.4m (57 ft)
excavatedbore)
Excavation 820,000m 3 (1,090,000cu yds)
Concrete 390,000m (520,000cu yds)
SteelRibs and Lining 20,000tons
cf. Mangla:
5 Tunnels 9, 9.4 and 7.9 m (30, 31 and 26 ft) diam.
475 m (1,560 ft) long
(a) Tarbela (470 ft) (low level outlets,T3 and T4) (1976)
95,000cusecs(Q max) 791 cusecs/ft(q) 120 ft wide.
PAKISTAN
REPORT
DAMPROJECTCOMPLETION
TARBELA
Becauseof the size and complexity of the project and the problems
that arose followingthe 1974 damages,the Tarbelainsuranceexperience
induceda criticalreviewof the adequacyof the traditional insuranceregime
for major civil works. In this connection,FIDICsponsoreda specialseminar
on insurancefo- major civilworks in June 1978, in which representatives of
the insurance,consultingand contractingindustriesas well as of ownersand
international agenciesparticipated.The main areas of concernon the
generalsubjectof insuringdam riskscan be summarizedas follows:
It should be noted that the Bank itselfdoes not insiston its bor-
rowersobtainingCAR or any otherspecifictype of insurance. However,FIDIC
StandardConditionsof Contract(International) for Works of Civil Engineer-
ing Construction,includingthe latestedition(March1977) (whichis fre-
quentlyused by Bank borrowers),does requirethat the contractorplace such
insurance.
Quote:
2. To ensure betterappreciation
of and provisionfor the risks
associatedwith the construction
of major (and/orcomplex)civil
engiaeeringprojects,the Committeerecommends:
End of Quote.
ANNEX 4
- 76 - Page 1
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAMPROJECTCOMPLETION
REPORT
US$ Millions
Australia 0.362
Germany 1.720
IDA 2.308
Italy 2.077
Pakistan 2.673
UnitedStates 2.883
UnitedKingdom 1.427
TotalAdjustedInsuranceRecovery 13.450
Second Insurance
Supplemental Recovery & EEC
& EEC Special Action Credit
Australia 363,008
Canada 8,783,707
EEC 6,825,492
EEC SpecialAction Credit 7,059,617
GermanyThroughPakistan 10,207,153*
IDA Credit 37,688,012*
Italy 9,420,375*
Pakistan(Incl.InsuranceRecovery) 3,000,000 2,673,000
TDF InsuranceRecovery - 2,960,304*
UK 21,697,008 -
97,984,755 12,692,931
Equivalent
US$ Million
Balanoe remaining on closure of the Indus Basin Development Fund on December 31, 1977.
Excludes.US$ 8 million, being payments up to May 2, 1969 for Tarbela preliminary
Works which were met from the Indus Basin Development Fund.
Includes insurance recoveries attributable to Germany, IDA, Italy and UK, which
Were allocated to the TDF as an additional contribution under the TDF (Second
Supplemental) Agreement, 1978. Also includes US$ 3 million contribution fro0
Government of Pakistan.
includes Pakistan's share of insurance recoveries and portion allocated for
direct return to TDF.
Foreign currency contributions from Kuwait. Saudi and Abu Dhabi Funds. Local
currency contributions are the rup"e payments made direct by WAPDAand not
thDough the TDF.
TARDStA DANl PiOJU?
SUMUUW OF REVISED CAPITAL COST ESSIME - JUNE 30. 1983
Section of Works Construction CD L ST Works Engineering Total Cstructlon Engiering Total Routded Total
Works inc. inc. LC PC Total
CD&ST monc. FC
Original Works 1260 1533 2793 254 3047 463.7 58.4 522.1 522
O&M 3 3 7.8 1.4 9.2 9
($640.5) 531.3 531 1,171.8
Repairs 52 - 52 14 66 19.5 2.5 22.0 22
($ 13.9) 35.9
Additional Work 55 - 55 20 75 28.1 5.6 33.7 34
($ 15.7) 49.4
Sub Total Original 1367 1533 2900 291 3191 519.1 67.9 587.0 587
Works a O&M ($670.1) 1,257.1
Spillway Remedial 1303 367 1670 60 1730 130.0 8.3 138.3 138
Works ($174.8)
S4 Outlet Works 329 131 460 25 485 39.0 8.5 47.5 48
(5 49.0)
Geotechnical Works etc. 64 16 80 38 118 7.0 9.4 16.4 16
(5 11.9)
Dzilling & Grouting 36 31 67 - 67 7.3 - 7.3 8
Works
(5 5.8)
Further Works and Geo-
technical Equipment - - - 4.2 - 4.2 4
(for direct disburse-
ment by WAPDA (IC) anet
Abu Dhabi Fund (PC))
Sub Total New Works 1732 545 2277 123 2400 187.5 26.2 213.7 214 455.2
($241.5)
Total All Works 3099 2078 S177 414 5591 706.6 94.1 800.7 801
($911.6) 1,712.3
Intereut on Sp.Plant
-6.7 -6.7 -7 -6.7
Bank Exchange Differ-
ence
1.0 1.011.
700.9 94.1 795.0 795
Exchange Rate
Losses (S4215.0) 5.0 - 5.0 5 -210.0 ; X
December June
1977 1983
-----(US$ Million)----
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAMPROJECT COMPLET.ION
REPORT
"Section 5.01(b). The Borrower shall cause the dam and other
facilities included in the project and the electrical power gener-
ating equipment associated therewith operated and maintained in
accordance with sound irrigation and elec ric utility practices." 1/
This covenant is being complied with although the resources of the Contractor
still provide significant back-up for WAPDA's O&M activities. The Bank has
pointed out (see ANNEX 4) that WAPDA's difficulty and delay in filling sanc-
tioned positions in the 0&M organization could affect WAPDA's ability to meet
this covenant. As WAPDA O&M forces assume the full work load in 1984 and as
increased local currency and foreign currency are made available, compliance
should be strengthened.
PAKISTAN
Agiculture
Fertilizer 6/
Power
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAMPROJECT COMPLETIONREPORT
Outputs
Inputs
Fertilizer 5/
N kg 55 60 65 30 100
P kg 15 18 21 30 40
Table 3
PAKIStA
TARSUA DAN PWt COWPLON tEPOtS
1970-71/ 1981-82
1974-75 thr
Vot Avsra 1/ 1975-76 1976-77 1977-8 1978-79 179-0 1980-81 1996-97 198-9 2008-09 2016-17
Oct/Nov Reissma at Canal Nled 3/ NA 3.097 3.379 4.920 6.502 5.658 5.646 5.6 6 5.678 5.454 4.334 3.438
tecapef 41 NAP 0 387 0.225 0."I 0 373 3.311 0 102 0.3 2 0.*83 0 4" O. 3t 0.292
Not AVSiLilttles 1t- VW- KW12 6.1' M V5 M r.
3s f0 TO T.T
Incremental Net Avallabilities MA 0.244 1.019 3.217 1.437 2.634 2.44 2.285 2.080 1.056 0.236
ir -t Area withitn
Total abt trbala
CanalCo_mmndSpate.8/ e000
SC 4,653.1 5,20t.1 5,357.6 5,559.4 5,935.2 6,164.2 - - - - -
1Wy i99 16 1im0 1n 197 1973 1974 1M 176 197 98 1m 1990 181 12 313 1994 9 3 15 1B 1 13990 g1
NMI .2/
LnwL rm - - - - - - - - m 93 1152 133M 267 23 24 22 254 2 27m 2717 27VS 2796 2797 2M
1I1E CWh.LC S 1 - - - 262 - - - 2192 m2 49 - m 76 259
- 2521 592 206 667 PO 154
m m OI1 4/ - - - - - - - - 104 104 104 t4 104 104 22? 2D 227 227 25 259 9 259 29 259
IEIM IL 8A91UNSAt - 57 set 1 190'4 24 290 4774 6135 6135 61 AM52 7247 7446 7m 9066
R UITOT - - - - - - 2192 229 20 163 17 334 5 7521 44 6 7125 761 75 72 Oe
914 G
TOTAL - - - - - - 655 2192 2501 305e 2935 3212 02 913 10010 962n 9115 9956 104 040 10725 1OM 11229
cx
i69C1lia .COSI / -- -- - - - 96 535 469 50 3024 9U5 93 943 990 103910P 109
@3 1123 116 119 1243
IllESTENT
COSTS
4J
ITOtA - - - - - - - - 1 7
n 103 244 In 336 13 22 294 314 3 37 374 374 4 374
T1lEtA913aT 64 2970 4936 51 5324 3355 03U4 t13 2531 156 1220 1402 1921- 176 198311 273 1791 1011 400 30 413 413 413
MAL 654 2970 4936 59 5m1 3155 3034 3013 2 220 169 102 2M5 27 297 275 37 2919 2073 1494 IS3 1576b 11 167
IW
ET IKi *I1N -654 -2670 -4036 -41 -5324 -3355 -2379 -931 -46 841 It" 1309 3182 562 79 6613 53 7 9376 6 7 9148 9? X
*10
'53513
UIU. DAN PRWOE cUWLitO am
A3 M2 92 1941917 1199 20 6 22 W f24 206 60 27 29 N20 31l 213 211 21 213 2914 15 2S 17
amm~~~~~ .
FM 3I11L . 1 Gm 9 m US 963 1A6 111091972 81 Om 9 1157 11102 "A 1a %6 9651 915 o6 Om g1 1n 888
JOI. t116 115 I2 13 11 16 1454 131131201 114341121 11915178 133 11275 075 110 1095 1026
M 93 99 94 t9 9
alllltiUl- - - - - - - - - ' ' ' ' - ' ' ' - - ' ' - ' -
FE 11tMl6JS t Z- i - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . - - _ _ _ _-
.IUEb.S _ _, , ,___ _,, _,_
IRMIIISSIU0
LIE - - - - - - -_ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
8O1BURM, 39 3 39 3 n n J9
9 D9 3J n 3 J9 3 t9l3 3 9 3 3 39 39 39 3 n
mi a mi
611139 23 75 23 23 23 23 23
23 KKItLENM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
23 23 23 25 23 23 2 2 23
5t 23 2 23 25t3 259
f
3 2
NER IIS/ ' 311 111 11IU IFMinimLAIM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1
115 l as 115115 IU 11315 3IU 1 It3
15 5 11
tU tU5 15 115 IUI 135 tt5 115 115 1t5 -
sSUhoIN. n4 374 37 374 374 pA 374 374 3t4 3t4 37 374 37 D4 3t4 D74 D74 3 3t4 3t4 374 374 374 37
~~~~~~
tMiaA 50310l6. 4Ul 413 413 413 41 413 4U3 *13 43 413 4333 1 413 413 413 413 413 413 413 413 413 413 413 41
tON 1694 tm3 177 3681 1712 1696 1675 117 1533 145 1337 33 126 129 113t 1074 3010 94 88 2 71 69 627 563
m i- 61111 9791 102 107 108 109 1096 1243 120 1651 998 919 301 1231 126 *101 67 101 96 34 92 05 86 01 7
95 -
~ ANNEX 6
Table 4
Page 3
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAM PROJECTCOMPLETI0N
REPORT
lines.
7/ IncludesO&M costs of incrementaltransmission
ANNEX 6
- 96 - Table 5
PAKISTAN
TARBELA
DAMPROJECTCOMPLETION
REPOR.
II. Costs
2. Recurrent Costs
a. Water Wing 2.7 1,141.9
b. Power Wing 1.2 2,649.9
PAKISTAN
TARBELADAM PROJECTCOMPLETIONREPOR`
List of References
15. Final Report by the Administrator to the Parties to the Indus 1977
Basin Development Fund Agreements of 1960 and 1964.
World Bank.
17. Tarbela Plan, Problems and Success. Water Power and Dam 1978
Construction,July 1978, pp. 29-34. Binger, W. V.
19. Draft Revised Action Program for Irrigated Agriculture in Pakistan 1979
(4 Volumes). WAPDA.
20. Fourth Nabor Carillo Lecture - Foundation Design of the Tarbela Dam. 1979
Lowe III, J.
23. The Tarbela Experience. Sir Alexander Gibb & Partners. 1980
I I
.~~~~~~~~
GOVERNMENT OF PAKIlSTAN -TRt DfEVtttDttUtT fD _
, , . ~~~ OtOIbIBANKt
SIR^INDER C>OPERSa
GIN IIPARN LYPm
WATERANDPOWER
I l ~~~~OEaVELOPMFENT
A_TMORITYf
AGENCIES
biOrAHATEDSO
;-CoNTRACToIR OT;tER
TUllbEL LtfRERSII PtNS?OCP.
CHICAGOBRIDGE G IRON CO SUB-CONTRACTORS
INDIA IRRIGATION
onfte Ieal statusof anytemntory
1 INTAKES
or anyendorsent or acceptance
of suchboundanes
.24' Afabion
Sea *.~)24- GANDAPTUNNEL
_._______________________________________________________________________ 644 72' 76 IRRIGATION
TUNNELS
STAGEI STAGEII ._- -
POWERTUNNELS
OUTLETCHANNEL
IBRD3891 (PCR)
PROJECT
PLAN I -------- MAY
1983
IMPE U lIMPERVIOUS BLANKETEXTENSION
-J/ A 2/0
SWTHYR : //g/ /, a
MPERIOUSBLAN
EFT $ANK
,,,yrii ~~~~~~~~~~ ~TUNNEL
BUTTRES$DAM
-1/1/
R OUTLETS M DAM
a t ----POW R OU E - /< N
r J~~~
gj2
13000
/ 2 0 00 3000