Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
B = 0 nI
where 0 is the permeability constant. Do your results agree with this equation? Explain. The
equation suggests that B is proportional to I. The graph in part I is consistent with this prediction.
The equation also suggests that B is proportional to n. The graph in part II is consistent with this
prediction.
9. Assuming the equation in the previous question applies for your solenoid, calculate the value
of 0 using your graph of B vs. n. 1.3 x 10^-6 T*m/A
10. Look up the value of 0, the permeability constant. 4pi x 10^-7, which is about 1.26 x 10^-6
T*m/A. Compare it to your experimental value. Our experimental value is very close, with a 3%
error.
11. Was your Slinky positioned along an east-west, north-south, or on some other axis? Along the
north axis. Will this have any effect on your readings? No, because we zero-ed the sensor before
we started.
Extensions:
1. Carefully measure the magnetic field at the end of the solenoid. How does it compare to the
value at the center of the solenoid? Its about half of what it is in the middle. (graph # 7) Try to
prove what the value at the end should be. The value at the end of the coil should be half the
value at the center.
2. Study the magnetic field strength inside and around a toroid, a circular-shaped solenoid.
According to the internet, the magnetic field B in the center of the toroid is equal to the number
of loops times the current in each loop. Which means that B2piR= 0NI, or B= 0NI/2piR. Since
R=0.2m, I=3A, and N=81, our hypothetical B is 0.1143mT. Experimenting, we get an average
magnetic field of 0.1256mT, which gives a percentage error of 4%.
3. If you have studied calculus, refer to a calculus-based physics text to see how the equation for
4. If you look up the permeability constant in a reference, you may find it listed in units
of henry/meter. Show that these units are the same as tesla-meter/ampere. Henry = 1 tesla
meter^2/ampere, so henry/meter*(tesla meter^2/ampere)/henry = tesla meter/ampere.
5. Take data on the magnetic field intensity vs. position along the length of the solenoid. Check
the field intensity at several distances along the axis of the Slinky past the end. Note any patterns
you see. Plot a graph of magnetic field (B) vs. distance from center. Use either Graphical Analysis
or graph paper. How does the value at the end of the solenoid compare to that at the center? Its
about half of what it is in the middle (see data table). How does the value change as you move
away from the end of the solenoid? It continues to decrease (see data table).
Distance from the Magnetic field B
centerofofslinky
center the slink
(m) (mT)
0.0 (the middle) 0.124
0.15 0.102
0.30 0.089
0.45 (the end) 0.061
0.60 0.034
0.75 0.022
0.90 0.010
1.05 0.003
1.20 0.001
(See graph 14)
6. Insert a steel or iron rod inside the solenoid and see what effect that has on the field intensity.
It increases dramatically at all points (at the middle, the magnetic field is .305mT and at the ends,
magnetic field is .159mT). Be careful that the rod does not short out with the coils of the Slinky.
You may need to change the range of the Magnetic Field Sensor.
7. Use the graph obtained in Part I to determine the value of 0. It is the slope of the best-fit
regression line, 0.133799 T*m/A.
Conclusion:
1. Our hypothesis correctly answers the lab questions.
2. Our hypothesis was correct! As the current increased in intervals of 0.5 Amps, the magnetic
field did in fact increase, from 0.064mT to 0.128mT to 0.200mT to 0.263mT. As we stretched out
the slinky in intervals of 0.5 meters, the magnetic field did in fact decrease, from 0.28mT to
0.13mT to 0.10mT to 0.08mT. We were also able to calculate the permeability constant by
measuring magnetic field B, number of turns n, and current I. We estimated 1.26 x 10^-6 T*m/A,
which is very close to the actual value 4pi x 10^-7 T*m/A with a 3% error. Also, as we moved the
magnetic field sensor towards the end of the slinky in intervals of 0.15m, the magnetic field
decreased until it reached the value of the middle at the ends. This is evidenced by the data
0.124mT at the middle, to 0.102mT, to 0.089mT, to 0.061mT at the end. It continued to decrease
past the ends (0.034mT to 0.022mT to 0.010 mT to 0.003mT to 0.001mT).
3. There are three possible sources of error for this lab. One is that the magnetic field sensor could
have rotated as we moved its location in slinky. This would have made our trials unreasonable to
compare, as the sensor has a different normal level as it is rotated. This could be alleviated by
moving the magnetic field sensor along a roller track over the slinky that is perfectly parallel with
the slinky. Another possible source of error is that the current reading on the current sensor
jumped around a lot, so we werent sure if the current going through the wire was really what we
recorded it as. This could have skewed the data. This issue may be alleviated by using a
battery/current sensor that doesnt jump around a lot. A final source of error could be that the
direction of the coil moved during the experiment. This would have influenced the magnetic field
sensor because the sensor has a different normal at each point on the compass. As a result, our
trials would be unreasonable to compare. This could be alleviated by fixing the coil to the table
so that it doesnt move.
4. We use the magnetic field generated from metal coils and electricity in everyday life.
In a car or truck, a solenoid is part of the starting system. The solenoid receives a large electric
current from the car battery and a small electric current from the ignition switch. When the
ignition switch is turned on by turning the key, the small electric current forces the solenoid to
close a pair of heavy contacts, thus relaying the large electric current to the motor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solenoid#Applications