Thermalfluid Lab MEC 554 / LSRC / SCA Rev.

01-2017

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Program : Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Mechanical

Course : Thermalfluids Lab
Course Code : MEC 554
Lecturer/Tutor Name :SYAFIQAHDAHIYAH BINTI RAMLAN
Group : EMD5M9A (3)

Lab Report

Experiments Tittle

FLAT PLATE BOUNDARY LAYER

Bil Student Name Student ID Signature

MOHAMAD FAIZ BIN MOHAMAD
1. 2016229872
ROHJONI
IZZUL HANIF BIN ABD AZIZ
2. 2016229994
MOHAMAD ADIB AZIZI BIN
3. BAHARUDDIN 2016229666

MASMIRA BINTI NASIR

4. 2016238564
MOHAMMAD FARHAN BIN KAMAL
5. ARIFFIN 2016230028

Lab Session : 2/10/2017 Approved by:

(Date)

Submission of Report : 23/10/2017 Received by:

(Date)
Assessment Rubric: Technical Content. 60 marks
Scale 1 2
Criteria Poor
1. Introduction Unable to generate a
(10 marks) complete theoretical formula
i.e. only writing the final
formula.
Make many errors in
applications of engineering
principles and concepts.
2. Experimental Unable to produce and
Procedure appropriate procedure to run
(10 marks) the experiment.
Having no objective(s).
Would not allow experiment
to achieve any goals.
3. Data / result and Unable to present
Sample Calculation experimental result using
(20 marks) appropriate tables, charts,
graphs or other presentation
formats.
4. Discussion and Unable to relate theoretical
Conclusion analysis with experimental
(20 marks) result and their practical
implication.
3 4
Acceptable
Adequately generate
theoretical formula with small
errors.
Make some but tolerable
errors in applications of
engineering principles and
concepts.
Adequately produce an
appropriate procedure to run
the experiment i.e. missing
steps in procedure.
Having objective(s). Would
allow experiment to achieve
most goals.
Adequately present
experimental result using
appropriate tables, charts,
graphs or other presentation
formats.
Adequately relate theoretical
analysis with experimental
result and their practical
implication.
5
Excellent
Student capable to generate a
complete theoretical formula
from the beginning.
All relevant engineering
principles and concepts are
accurately and comprehensively
demonstrated and applied.
Student capable to produce a
detailed procedure to run the
experiment.
Objective clearly defined.
Would allow experiments to
achieve goals.
Students capable to articulate
experimental result using
appropriate tables, charts,
graphs or other presentation
formats.
Students capable to relate
theoretical analysis with
experimental result and their
practical implication.
 Unable to come out a clear Conclusion is not clear, but Student capable to express a
and understandable yet, understandable in such clear and concise conclusion.
conclusion. manner.

Assessment Rubric: Writing Performance Level. 20 marks

Scale 1 2 3 4 5
Criteria Poor Acceptable Excellent
1. Structure Paragraphs are poorly Paragraphs are usually well All paragraphs are well
(5marks) organized; use of sections is organized; use of sections is organized; use of sections is
illogical and hinders logical and generally allows logical and allows easy
document navigation. easy document navigation. navigation through the
document.

2. Graphics, figures, Figures, tables and equations Some figures, tables and All figures, tables and equations
tables and equations. are not clearly or logically equations are logically are clearly and logically
(5marks) identified and fail to support identified and adequately identified and strongly support
the text. support the text. the text.
3. Mechanics Sentences are poorly written;
(5marks) numerous incorrect word
choices and errors in
grammar, punctuation and
spelling.
4. Formatting and Report is formatted poorly
references and lacks a quality cover
(5marks) page and index.
Fails to correctly report any
sources or to utilize
appropriate citation forms.
Sentences are generally well
written; a few incorrect word
choices and errors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Formatting of the report is
genarally consistent and
adequate,includes a quality
cover page and index.
Most sources are correctly
reported; appropriate citation
forms are genarally utilized.
Sentences are well written; there
are no incorrect word choices
and the text is free of errors in
grammar, punctuation and
spelling.
Formatting of the report is
professional and includes a
professional cover page and
index.
All sources are correctly
reported; appropriate citation
forms are utilized thoughout.
 FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
40450 SHAH ALAM
SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN
Tel: 03-55435190 Fax: 03-55435160
____________________________________________________________________________
________

REPORT ASSESSMENT FORM

Experiments Title:

____________________________________FLAT PLATE BOUNDARY LAYER___________________________________

Prepared by:

Bil Name Matrix No Signature

MOHAMAD FAIZ BIN MOHAMAD ROHJONI 2016229872
IZZUL HANIF BIN ABD AZIZ 2016229994
MOHAMAD ADIB AZIZI BIN BAHARUDDIN 2016229666
MASMIRA BINTI NASIR 2016238564
MOHAMMAD FARHAN BIN KAMAL ARIFFIN 2016230028

Course Outcome Assessment

No Technical Report
Full Mark Given Mark
1 Introduction CO2 10
Experimental
2 C02 10
Procedures
Data/result/sample of
3 CO2 20
calculation
Discussion and
4 CO2 20
Conclusion
TOTAL 60 /60
Course Outcome Assessment
No Writing Performance
Full Mark Given Mark
1 Structure CO3 5
2 Graphics/Figures/Tables C03 5
3 Mechanics CO3 5
Formatting and
4 CO3 5
references
TOTAL 20 /20
TOTAL MARKS 80 /80